Discussion: Bridges of the World July 2026
FR

Translated into English.

XR Xrctn Veteran ·
Okay with the realignment and lighting, but I think the change in orientation is a bit too radical, even if the aesthetics are improved.
https://voyageforum.com/v.f?post=6884794;a=6884794
RO Rouquine38 Globetrotter ·
Okay with the straightening and lighting, but I find the change in orientation a bit too radical, even if the aesthetics are improved.

Yes, totally agree—I made the orientation change to show how the feel can be really different. Of course, I wouldn’t do it for real since we’ve got to prioritize reality over aesthetics 😄
"Voyager est un triple plaisir : l'attente, l'éblouissement et le souvenir." Ilka Chase
TY Tylassin Veteran ·
Hi there,

Thanks for your tips, and you're right—your edited photo has a lot more energy!

Personally, I don’t like retouching my photos. I prefer keeping things as I saw them, even if sometimes (rarely) I let my phone app crop them a bit.

Actually, my photos are mostly for sharing on FB with friends.



This photo has potential—it could use some improvements, in my opinion. I’ll go ahead and make a suggestion: - Photos are read from left to right, and while that doesn’t reflect reality, I’d flip it horizontally. - I’d straighten the perspectives a bit. Though there’s not quite enough detail to do it perfectly. -I’d work on the sky, which is really interesting, by boosting the whites and blacks for more contrast. -I’d highlight the castle by darkening the rest of the photo.

Here’s my take:

GA Gaura Veteran ·
You're going all out, Isabelle—flipping a castle is bold! I’d just straighten it, enhance the sky like you did, and maybe crop the bottom. The reflections aren’t as interesting as the castle, and they throw off the balance—the castle’s almost hitting the top of the frame.
gaura
GA Gaura Veteran ·
Hi Michel, We all take photos to show our friends, not for exhibitions or books. And your camera, like all others, doesn’t photograph "what you see" as you say—it captures what its software interprets from what you’ve framed. Straightening an image takes a few seconds, tweaking a sky or brightening shadows only takes a few minutes at most. You often share interesting photos; they’re almost there to be really great. Your friends wouldn’t mind if you gave them a little boost, and I think you’d be happy with the result too. Don’t underestimate yourself😉. Take these constructive suggestions as encouragement, not criticism😉
gaura
TY Tylassin Veteran ·
Don’t worry, I didn’t take it the wrong way at all! 😄

I take a lot of photos, and I must be a little lazy not to do it 😄
RO Rouquine38 Globetrotter ·
You're going all out, Isabelle—flipping a castle is bold! I’d settle for straightening it, enhancing the sky like you did, and maybe cropping the bottom. The reflections aren’t as interesting as the castle, and they throw off the balance—the castle almost bumps into the top of the frame.

Yeah, I went for it 😄 😄 True, if you remove the bottom, the reflection loses its purpose, but I think here it works because it fills the water in the foreground. The photo could’ve used a wider angle to get more sky 😊
"Voyager est un triple plaisir : l'attente, l'éblouissement et le souvenir." Ilka Chase
RO Rouquine38 Globetrotter ·
Don’t worry, I didn’t take it the wrong way at all 😄

I take a lot of photos, and I must be a bit lazy not to do it 😄

I really like this photo—that’s why I allowed myself to share my take on it 😊. We don’t take photos to please everyone; the main thing is to enjoy yourself 😉
"Voyager est un triple plaisir : l'attente, l'éblouissement et le souvenir." Ilka Chase
KA Kate Globetrotter ·
I’d adjust all the perspectives a bit. There’s still not enough material to do it properly.

In Photoshop, you can recover the material that gets cropped out. It doesn’t always work, but it gives good results.

Overall, I agree with you, with just a few minor details. The discussion remains open, and this is just my point of view 😉 This new composition is solid, the sky is gorgeous and adds a cinematic feel to the scene, but does such a spectacular sky steal the spotlight from the castle? Isn’t the castle supposed to be the main focus? (Unless it’s a contest about bridges, of course.) Also, during editing, the castle lost a bit of its ochre color, and I find the overall image a tad too dark. I imagine if you had worked with a raw file, you’d have gotten finer nuances.
Mes photos sur Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/153304262@N05/albums "Le Temps nous égare. Le Temps nous étreint. Le Temps nous est gare. Le Temps nous est train".
MU Muriel18 Globetrotter ·
I’ve been following all your exchanges with interest... even if I feel like I’m on another planet I (almost) never edit my photos (except for horizons that aren’t horizontal, which drive me crazy). I did try to get into it (with Lightroom) a few years ago, but honestly, it just doesn’t interest me. I just try to pay attention when taking the shot (framing, settings)... maybe the result of many years with film That said, I still find your comments about Tylassin’s photo really interesting 😉.
Si tu diffères de moi, mon frère, loin de me léser, tu m'enrichis (Saint Exupéry)
RO Rouquine38 Globetrotter ·
I’d adjust all the perspectives a bit. There’s still some material missing to do it properly.

In Photoshop, you can recover the material that gets cropped out. It doesn’t always work, but it gives good results.

Overall, I agree with you, with just a few minor details. The discussion is still open, and this is just my point of view 😉 This new composition is solid—the sky is gorgeous and gives the scene a cinematic feel—but doesn’t that spectacular sky steal the spotlight from the castle? Isn’t the castle supposed to be the main focus? (Unless it’s a bridge competition, of course.) Also, during editing, the castle lost a bit of its ochre color, and I find the whole thing a tad too dark. I imagine if you’d worked with a raw file, you’d have gotten finer nuances...

Thanks, Kate, for sharing your thoughts! 😊 I really love this exercise and these exchanges—they give a different perspective and help us improve. Yes, with Photoshop, anything’s possible now 😄—personally, I rarely use it. Lightroom has come a long way in recent years, and usually, it’s enough for me. Yes, the sky is stunning—I love skies like this and always tend to highlight them 😊. I think you’ve probably noticed—I love photos that are a little dark, and yeah… sometimes a bit too much 🙈 Absolutely, the file we get from VF has very little resolution… we can’t work miracles.
"Voyager est un triple plaisir : l'attente, l'éblouissement et le souvenir." Ilka Chase
RO Rouquine38 Globetrotter ·
I’ve been following your exchanges with interest... even if I feel like I’m on another planet I (almost) never edit my photos (except for horizons that aren’t horizontal, which drive me crazy). I did try to get into it (with Lightroom) a few years ago, but honestly, it doesn’t interest me. I just try to pay attention when taking the shot (framing, settings)... maybe the result of many years shooting film That said, I still find your comments about Tylassin’s photo really interesting 😉.

Yes, Muriel, you’re absolutely right. Almost all pro photographers say the same thing: "90% of the photo happens in the field." You have to use all the camera’s capabilities to get the desired result right when you take the shot. The RAW file is what the negative was in film—you need to develop it to get a photo. If you shoot in JPEG, the camera automatically processes it, but you no longer have the native file.
"Voyager est un triple plaisir : l'attente, l'éblouissement et le souvenir." Ilka Chase
MA Marien33 Veteran ·
Hi Isabelle,

Absolutely, the file we get from VF has very low resolution... we can't work miracles.

I was actually wondering how you managed to rework this photo, especially after Kate’s first comment. I was thinking, how did she get the file? A screenshot? I’ve done that myself with other photos, but I found that the result wasn’t what I wanted with a photo captured that way, and I didn’t say anything because I thought the photo’s author wouldn’t be happy that I’d taken the liberty of "working" on their photo. I did it once, and the woman who took the photo was really shocked—or hurt—that I’d touched her photo and "made a big deal out of it."

I use Photoshop Elements, which is more than enough for me for small corrections, because I prefer to stay as close as possible to the original photo without distorting my initial work too much when taking the shot. I gave up on Photoshop—it’s too expensive and too complicated for my degenerating brain—and along the way, I also stopped shooting in Raw (for the same reasons). I think I’m at least 20 years older than all of you, and my various health issues have really compromised my attention, concentration, and cognition in general, so I don’t want (or can’t) bother with too many edits anymore. Unfortunately, "in the field," I realize I’m making more and more setting and calculation mistakes, not to mention the times I forget to disable a previous setting—you can imagine the disaster! My eyesight isn’t what it used to be either. Etc. So I try to fix things in post-processing with Photoshop Elements, which is more than enough to adjust levels, contrast, depth of field, brightness, etc., as long as the end result is a photo I like. Like you, Isabelle, I’ve already told you—I much prefer dark photos, though not everyone agrees. But I find that you can express so much more in a dark photo, and it’s so much more aesthetic (artistic?). But that’s just my personal opinion and taste.

I’ve also noticed that my photos from recent years are often much less successful (beautiful?) than the ones I took 10, 15, or 20 years ago. Is it the equipment or the brain—or both—that’s changed?
Je rencontrai sur mon chemin tant de difficultés Qu’elles furent toutes surmontées MIRZA GHALIB poète urdu (1796 -1869) https://www.telling-india-pictures.com https://youpic.com/marien
AT Attila Globetrotter ·
From a computer, you just need to download the photo. Usually, I click on it, choose to open it in a new page, and then by clicking again, the download option appears.

On a smartphone, it’s not possible. At least not on mine.

The problem when you get older isn’t necessarily the photo or the device, but our eyes.

Between severe myopia, presbyopia, cataracts, and other delightful issues, we don’t see like we used to.

My brother just had cataract surgery at 61. He tells me he can see again!

Others have said the same thing after the operation.
La rue comme gagne-pain : concours de photos amical de septembre 2026 Rubrique Jeux Voyages C'est le moment de poster vos meilleurs clichés !
MA Marien33 Veteran ·
From a computer, you just need to download the photo.\nUsually, I click on it, choose to open it in a new page, then click again, and the download option appears.\n\nI don’t have that option. When I click on the photo, all I get is the photo’s URL, which doesn’t help with downloading it. I’ve already tried...\nAnother thing about getting older is that tech keeps evolving all the time—it just feels more and more complicated. You’ve got to keep up constantly, and there comes a point where you just can’t keep up anymore... Eyesight can be fixed. Lost brain cells? Not so much. 🧓
Je rencontrai sur mon chemin tant de difficultés Qu’elles furent toutes surmontées MIRZA GHALIB poète urdu (1796 -1869) https://www.telling-india-pictures.com https://youpic.com/marien
RO Rouquine38 Globetrotter ·
Hi Jean Marie, To save an image, I right-click on it and choose "save image as"; the file doesn’t have much resolution and is only 200–300 KB. In Lightroom, I use super-resolution to increase the pixel count. Yes, unfortunately, nothing gets easier as we get older—the main thing is to still enjoy ourselves and go at our own pace.
"Voyager est un triple plaisir : l'attente, l'éblouissement et le souvenir." Ilka Chase
MA Marien33 Veteran ·
Anyway, thanks for your help!
Je rencontrai sur mon chemin tant de difficultés Qu’elles furent toutes surmontées MIRZA GHALIB poète urdu (1796 -1869) https://www.telling-india-pictures.com https://youpic.com/marien
MA Marien33 Veteran ·
Hi Jean Marie, To save an image, I right-click on it and choose "save image as"; the file doesn’t have much resolution and is only 200-300 KB. In Lightroom, I use super-resolution to increase the number of pixels. Yes, unfortunately, as we get older, nothing improves—what matters is still enjoying ourselves and going at our own pace.

Thanks for your explanation. I tried it with one of Noelle’s photos. This time, it worked even better than your method. Save as, and then when I click to open it, the photo automatically opens in Photoshop at 1400 x 787 resolution. Full-screen display. Perfect image. And I can work on it perfectly. Thanks for your tips. Now I’ll be able to "borrow" your photos and others... 😈🤹‍♂️🤹‍♂️
Je rencontrai sur mon chemin tant de difficultés Qu’elles furent toutes surmontées MIRZA GHALIB poète urdu (1796 -1869) https://www.telling-india-pictures.com https://youpic.com/marien
MA Marien33 Veteran ·
Hi Noëlle, I had a lot of fun playing with your two photos of the Ponte Vecchio, front and back. Especially by darkening them a bit, just the way I like it. Just to see what I would’ve done if I’d taken those photos myself.

I get why, a year or two ago, I found one of my photos online with someone claiming it was theirs...

Your photos are really beautiful. It was just for fun, to see what you can do by "borrowing" a photo like that. Now I understand why some people here in travel journals slap a huge signature watermark on their photos to protect them... a little, at least. But it ruins the photo, and on top of that, you can remove that signature in all sorts of ways...
Je rencontrai sur mon chemin tant de difficultés Qu’elles furent toutes surmontées MIRZA GHALIB poète urdu (1796 -1869) https://www.telling-india-pictures.com https://youpic.com/marien
MA Marien33 Veteran ·
Tancarville Bridge

Je rencontrai sur mon chemin tant de difficultés Qu’elles furent toutes surmontées MIRZA GHALIB poète urdu (1796 -1869) https://www.telling-india-pictures.com https://youpic.com/marien
XR Xrctn Veteran ·
On the other hand, no dancing on Pemberton Bridge! (see photo 3 in the contest)

https://voyageforum.com/v.f?post=6884794;a=6884794
MA Marien33 Veteran ·
A bridge can also connect two wings of a building (the Viceroy’s Palace in India under the British Raj, in Shimla)

Je rencontrai sur mon chemin tant de difficultés Qu’elles furent toutes surmontées MIRZA GHALIB poète urdu (1796 -1869) https://www.telling-india-pictures.com https://youpic.com/marien
TY Tylassin Veteran ·
I’d kind of forgotten about this bridge, but Facebook just reminded me—it’s the anniversary! Exactly one year ago in Saxon Switzerland, north of Dresden. 😊

RA Ragamuffin Globetrotter ·
Good evening,

la Suisse Saxonne au nord de Dresde

I’d say it’s actually southeast of Dresden, following the Elbe River upstream (see the link to Google Maps below).

https://www.google.com/maps/@50.978766,13.956555,10.53z?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDcxNS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D

I regret not visiting during my trip to Dresden in June 2017, as I chose to go all the way to the Polish border in Görlitz instead—a city that inspired Wes Anderson for his film *The Grand Budapest Hotel*. I think Saxon Switzerland might have also been part of his inspiration, right? Anyway, thanks for the photo—it took me back to my travel memories! 😉
"Nous ne sommes plus une communauté d'être humains qui se parlent mais un conglomérat de grappes de consommateurs en niches, séparés les uns des autres par des obsessions diverses et innombrables. Nous sommes de l'ère de la désintégration." Marc Moulin (1942-2008) in Humoeurs
TY Tylassin Veteran ·
Yeah, you're right about the geography. Sorry 😅

It *is* a really pretty place, but packed with tourists in July.

Several films have been shot in Görlitz. I stopped there for lunch just before crossing into Poland.
TY Tylassin Veteran ·
Last day in Germany before heading to Denmark—visited an inhabited bridge (not a mill) today in Wismar.

RO Rouquine38 Globetrotter ·
A big thank you for your wonderful bridge suggestions! 😊 For those who are running late, there are still a few days left! 😉
"Voyager est un triple plaisir : l'attente, l'éblouissement et le souvenir." Ilka Chase
RO Rouquine38 Globetrotter ·
The three Queensferry bridges north of Edinburgh



"Voyager est un triple plaisir : l'attente, l'éblouissement et le souvenir." Ilka Chase
RO Rouquine38 Globetrotter ·
A bridge can also connect two wings of a building (the Viceroy's Palace in India under the British Raj, in Shimla)



Hi Jean Marie,

That’s a gorgeous photo, but it doesn’t look like a bridge—more like the interior of a beautiful wooden residence 😊 I really love the two light spots in the photo: the one below that highlights the painting and the one above that really brings out the bridge. To nitpick a little, I would’ve liked to see the person climbing the stairs instead of standing still in the lower part of the image.

I don’t know if you’re familiar with Ansel Adams’ 11-zone system, but you must be getting pretty close to mastering it 👍 Well done! I get what you mean about loving dark photos—I do too, just not as much 😄
"Voyager est un triple plaisir : l'attente, l'éblouissement et le souvenir." Ilka Chase
MA Marien33 Veteran ·
Hi Isabelle,

but it doesn’t look like a bridge—more like the interior of a beautiful wooden residence

Well, the photo is dark, so it’s hard to see, but click on it to enlarge it and look closely at the upper left part. You can clearly see the other part of the wall, which shows that this gallery is surrounded by empty space on both the right and left, and it connects two independent parts of the château. So, in my view, it *is* a bridge between those two sections since its role is to link them.

To nitpick a little, I would’ve liked to see the character climbing the stairs instead of being in a static position at the bottom of the image.

You know, you can’t ask too much of museum (or château) guards. They usually just wait for the day to pass as best they can...

I don’t know if you’re familiar with Ansel Adams’ 11 zones, but you must be getting pretty close! 👍 Bravo!

You know, I’ve told you before—I have no formal photography training. I’m completely self-taught. I regret it, but I’m not ashamed of it. I rely solely on my eye, my intuition, and my personal taste.

I get it when you say you like dark photos—I do too, just not as much 😊

I *could* have made this photo less dark, but I wanted it this way to better capture the eerie atmosphere of the château, the austere people who lived or stayed there, and that "tomb-like" vibe I imagined. Otherwise, there’s a trend I’ve noticed on Youpic among photographers specializing in monochrome—they *all* make their photos *very* dark, much darker than mine (😵), and I don’t particularly like it, but they’re among the most "awarded" by the curators (pro photographers on the site). One day, I asked one of them if the extreme darkness was intentional. (Big mistake! Felt like I was telling him he didn’t know how to handle light.) He gave me a curt reply, very politely pointing out that I knew nothing about black-and-white photography... 😵
Je rencontrai sur mon chemin tant de difficultés Qu’elles furent toutes surmontées MIRZA GHALIB poète urdu (1796 -1869) https://www.telling-india-pictures.com https://youpic.com/marien
VO Voyajou Globetrotter ·
In some parts of the world, bridges are also targets. A bridge destroyed by an American strike in Bandar-e Abbas, southern Iran, on July 17th.



Photo published by Le Monde, on July 21st (and not retouched )
TY Tylassin Veteran ·
We had to wait three days before finding a bridge worth a quick photo. In Silkeborg, just a small wooden bridge at the junction of two lakes a few hours ago. The bare minimum 😅
LU LuluMae Veteran ·
Hi there,

So happy to be back here and see so many familiar names! After a few years away, and some odd behavior when I try to preview my messages, I’ll start with a test by posting a photo here before I dare enter the contest.

Let’s see if this post ends up like that Icelandic bridge, swept away during the Eyjafjallajökull eruption.

RO Rouquine38 Globetrotter ·
Hello,

So happy to be back here and see so many familiar names! After a few years away, and some odd behavior when I try to preview my messages, I’ll start with a test by posting a photo here before I dare enter the contest.

Let’s see if this message washes up like that Icelandic bridge, swept away during the Eyjafjallajökull eruption.



Welcome back to the forum, Sophie—everything’s working 👍 You’ve still got two days to post your photos for the contest 😊
"Voyager est un triple plaisir : l'attente, l'éblouissement et le souvenir." Ilka Chase
TY Tylassin Veteran ·
One last bridge, perhaps.

At Den Gamle By in Aarhus, Denmark, this morning.

A reconstructed village with old houses.

MU Muriel18 Globetrotter ·
Hello! That photo #3 looked familiar to me.... I’ve got (almost) the same one under the sun ;)

Si tu diffères de moi, mon frère, loin de me léser, tu m'enrichis (Saint Exupéry)
LU LuluMae Veteran ·
Fresh off the press, photo taken in the Rhodopes, in southern Bulgaria.

MA Marien33 Veteran ·
Good evening Isabelle... The bridge photos are pouring in like rain. Each one is as interesting as the next. That’s exactly what I told you from the start. It was an excellent theme choice because who isn’t tempted to take a photo of a bridge? And I suspected we’d have a plethora of beautiful bridge photos. It’s going to be really tough to choose. Like in presidential elections—so many candidates that it’s hard to see just two make it to the final round... Three for the photo contest. 🤔
Je rencontrai sur mon chemin tant de difficultés Qu’elles furent toutes surmontées MIRZA GHALIB poète urdu (1796 -1869) https://www.telling-india-pictures.com https://youpic.com/marien
DJ Djalma Globetrotter ·
Another bridge in the Rhodopes (Bulgaria)😉
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XCOyB7WStI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2eI67iCbKY
MA Marien33 Veteran ·
Another bridge in the Rhodopes (Bulgaria)😉

Gorgeous!
Je rencontrai sur mon chemin tant de difficultés Qu’elles furent toutes surmontées MIRZA GHALIB poète urdu (1796 -1869) https://www.telling-india-pictures.com https://youpic.com/marien
RO Rouquine38 Globetrotter ·
Good evening Isabelle.. The bridge photos are pouring in like rain. Each one is as interesting as the next. That’s exactly what I told you from the start. It was an excellent theme choice because who isn’t tempted to take a photo of a bridge? And I suspected we’d have a plethora of beautiful bridge photos. It’s going to be really tough to choose. Like in presidential elections—so many candidates that it’s hard to see just two make it to the final round... Three for the photo contest. 🤔

Yes, some truly stunning photos in the contest and the discussion 😊 Only a few hours left to post your photos—after that, voting begins! 😮
"Voyager est un triple plaisir : l'attente, l'éblouissement et le souvenir." Ilka Chase
TY Tylassin Veteran ·
One last little one for today—this afternoon, the Rosenholm Castle bridge, still in Denmark 😊. Maybe it’ll switch sides soon 😄.

RO Rouquine38 Globetrotter ·
You’ve got a few days left to vote for the top 3 bridge photos! 😊
"Voyager est un triple plaisir : l'attente, l'éblouissement et le souvenir." Ilka Chase
PA Pagaljavab Globetrotter ·
As a nature lover, I eliminate anything that leans toward gigantism and is just concrete and steel. I favor traditional structures and local materials like stone and wood that blend into the landscape. I also eliminate photos where you can barely make out the bridge or only see a small part of it. With what’s left, the choice is still tough—I lean more toward stone structures than simple wooden or vine bridges, which require less work and ingenuity to build and are sometimes just there to entertain tourists.

Hello Djalma,

We all have our own personal criteria for judging a photo, and they’re all valid. So this is just my take.

I think that’s a pretty narrow view, especially since in a photo contest, the focus is more on the photographer’s ability to capture an aesthetic moment that tells a story. Why would stone, wood, or vine bridges—only in a natural setting (and photographed in their entirety!)—be the only ones aesthetically acceptable or capable of telling a story? Plus, with such rigid criteria, there’d be little variety in the submissions—all the photos would end up looking the same.

I appreciate the aesthetic you’re talking about, but a metal structure in an industrial landscape, captured beautifully (even partially) and telling a story about its human, social, or cultural role, totally fits the theme as long as the bridge is the main element.

I’d definitely vote for a stunning photo of a modern bridge over a poorly shot vine bridge in the jungle, and vice versa—because this is a photo contest, not an ideological one.

Anyway, I’m not trying to convince you, and I respect your perspective. But it’s a shame to limit your vision so much in an artistic field.

Have a great day!
MA Marien33 Veteran ·
I was about to chime in just to say that this is a photo contest, not a bridge contest. Like Attila mentioned, the theme is the bridge, but no matter which bridge it is, what counts is the aesthetic and technical quality of the photo.
Je rencontrai sur mon chemin tant de difficultés Qu’elles furent toutes surmontées MIRZA GHALIB poète urdu (1796 -1869) https://www.telling-india-pictures.com https://youpic.com/marien
DJ Djalma Globetrotter ·
Hi

We all have our own personal criteria for judging a photo, and they’re all valid

So, in principle, mine are valid too? I fully accept that mine are outside the norm—or let’s say atypical—but that’s just how it is. It’s not about ideology but an instinctive reaction that doesn’t go through "the intellect." Whether it’s skyscrapers, high-voltage power lines, wind turbines, or bridges made of steel and concrete, they deeply offend my sensibility and my particular sense of aesthetics. Even though photos of these "structures," products of advanced technology, might tell a story and fit perfectly within the theme—as you say—I’ll never be able to appreciate the photo representing them at its true value. If my judgment and my vote cause a problem, I can remove the latter, or you can—it won’t bother me. Besides, until now, I haven’t taken part in this kind of contest, and I think this will be my last participation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XCOyB7WStI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2eI67iCbKY
RO Rouquine38 Globetrotter ·
Hi everyone, I’m bouncing off the latest messages and not replying to anyone in particular. Voting is always subjective because it’s inevitably based on personal feelings. Everyone has their own criteria and votes accordingly—I think it’s great to share why we made our choices. Sometimes, it’s just a matter of the heart... I love all this diversity we have on this forum, which isn’t necessarily due to photographic skill but rather the emotion and story behind each photo. The discussions are always interesting—it’s how we broaden our perspectives. Happy voting to all!
"Voyager est un triple plaisir : l'attente, l'éblouissement et le souvenir." Ilka Chase
PA Pagaljavab Globetrotter ·
No, your criteria don’t bother me, and I don’t want any comments deleted. I won’t repeat everything I’ve already written—basically, that all choices are valid and I accept yours. But since this is a discussion and your message struck me, I was just reacting on a purely personal level to say that I felt all the criteria you listed for what makes a bridge photo "valid" in your eyes necessarily led to a very narrow view of the theme. Though I don’t know where you got the idea that I was asking for censorship or anything like that.

Still, my reaction ended up giving you a chance to explain your choice more clearly, which is great and really adds to the discussion!
KA Kate Globetrotter ·
You're being pretty touchy, Jean-Michel! 😉 You're not gonna pull that on us too, are you... no, never mind...
Mes photos sur Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/153304262@N05/albums "Le Temps nous égare. Le Temps nous étreint. Le Temps nous est gare. Le Temps nous est train".
MA Marien33 Veteran ·
You’re being pretty touchy, Jean-Michel! 😉 You’re not gonna pull that on us too, are you... no, never mind...

I was dying laughing too, and I immediately thought of you and your... no, never mind... 🤭😂
Je rencontrai sur mon chemin tant de difficultés Qu’elles furent toutes surmontées MIRZA GHALIB poète urdu (1796 -1869) https://www.telling-india-pictures.com https://youpic.com/marien

Similar discussions

You might also like