Practical aspects spring 2026: border to Murmansk, to Pskov, SIM cards, internet.
FR

Translated into English.

TA Tatra Globetrotter ·
We know, thanks. You’ve been hammering this home since Russia launched its attack on Ukraine, and so far, we’ve still been very well received in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and even Tajikistan.

For now. And it’s not just about being well received or not—it’s about proximity to a system. The idea that these three states, at this critical moment, would side with the US/Europe when their cultural, political, and economic ties to Russia and China are so obvious—just walking down the streets makes that clear—seems highly unlikely to me. Do you follow the news and current events in these countries? Are you interested in their economies?

Michel
CH Chalembert Regular ·
So then: - Is it possible in Russia to openly criticize the regime, the government, the president—on TV, radio, in newspapers, on the internet, or even in a café with strangers—without risking anything, like you do openly about the EU, Schengen, or NATO? - Is it possible in Russia to freely create a political party that openly opposes presidential policies without any risks? - If Schengen is a prison and Russia is the embodiment of freedom, what’s stopping you from living there?
TA Tatra Globetrotter ·
We don’t realize how lucky we are to live outside the iron grip of the Russian empire or theocracies like Iran.

Yes, but that’s just a figure of speech, and it’s super biased. Russia is huge—there are dozens of official and recognized languages (yes, really!). Not folklore, but real everyday languages that shape human experience and identity, whether people live in communities or not, far from some abstract universalism or Rousseau-esque ideal. There’s also a lot of religious diversity in Russia, practiced very openly and explicitly, from Tatarstan to Birobidzhan. Most Russians feel Russian or something else, and honestly, they don’t care much about not being able to criticize Moscow’s power at the café. They don’t give political squabbles the same weight we do by making them central to citizenship. Attila, she reads the subsidized French press and struggles—it’s a shame—to put things in perspective. For most people, the central government is what it is, but it’s distant, not intrusive in private or intimate life, and in that sense, it’s not seen as oppressive. It’s a bias—you’re projecting a state’s ideology onto the diversity of a federation of nations.

I also wonder why people who feel trapped in democracies stay there? Stockholm syndrome, or do they deep down know their lives would be a living hell in the dictatorships they defend? Enough complaining over nothing...

You’re funny. 🤪 Imagine you don’t share the values of the Republic in France. What are you? You didn’t choose anything, didn’t ask for anything—you just happened to be born in France to French parents, and you’re automatically disqualified from citizenship. You can’t express yourself in public without being blamed or attacked, and you can’t run for office. They won’t throw you in prison, but for your whole life, you’ll have to be a stranger to the state’s politics. So what should you do? Leave? But this is your home, your country. The political regime is one thing—it’s temporary. That’s why Jafar Panahi went back to Iran. He’s constantly at odds with the regime, but the country, the nation—that’s not the regime. In France, we reduce the nation to the state and the state to the Republic. That doesn’t help us understand things clearly, because identity is complex and can’t be dissolved into universalism or transcendent values. I’ll grant you it’s an old way of thinking, but it’s so ingrained in many people’s minds that stepping back is often impossible.

Michel
PA Parigino Veteran ·
So Jafar Panahi returned to Iran; he constantly opposes the regime, but the country, the nation, isn't the regime.

Hundreds of thousands of Iranians have left and never returned. They didn’t make some fantastic story about "yay, I escaped prison" just to meekly go back home. That’s the difference between the mediocre and the courageous.
AT Attila Globetrotter ·
like in the 70s or 80s, when visiting Romania was a moon landing adventure.

Meh.

I drove to Romania before democracy. Nothing too difficult except understanding there were two lines at the border. One for Westerners, quick and with few hassles. The other for Easterners, slow and nitpicky.

Back then, there were also border checks between France and Spain. It just took a bit longer with that little thrill of the unknown.

The real difference came afterward. A rush toward Westerners to buy what was missing there—basically everything... And a rush to talk to them, to have free conversations away from prying ears.

There are very alarming signs in this direction in France and Europe, not necessarily about personal criticism of power, but about political, religious, or moral positions, or about existential and cultural choices.

Some of you here seem to think the grass is greener elsewhere. Yet, despite your critiques, you don’t strike me as having been handed a one-way ticket to some Western gulag.

What a difference from Russia!

I wonder if the author of this post would dare to criticize Vladimir’s system on a Russian forum. Normally, yes—since everything’s rosy there. They risk nothing...
AT Attila Globetrotter ·
In France, you have to be much more careful about what you say and write online

More than in Russia?

After that, you’re kinda right since one of my messages disappeared...
AT Attila Globetrotter ·
Most Russians feel Russian or something else, and honestly, they don’t care about not being able to criticize Moscow’s power at the café,

Not so great for Russian opposition...

Move along, nothing to see here.

And what should you do? Leave?

It seems logical to leave a place where you don’t feel good.

That’s what tons of people around the world do.

French people leave too, but usually not for political or religious reasons.

For the taste of adventure, economic reasons, or just being fed up with French complainers...

They even end up choosing dictatorships as their new home. Not because they support the regime’s ideology, but for the sunshine, to escape taxes, or a much more appealing cost of living. They come back when the wind changes or when health fails.

Still, they don’t pick overly oppressive dictatorships: North Korea doesn’t attract many, nor does Afghanistan.

On the other hand, the flow of political refugees between dictatorships and the West is significant. Reading some comments here, I wonder why?
TA Tatra Globetrotter ·
Very nice for Russian opponents... Move along, there's nothing to see.

It’s not about being nice or not; there are opponents, activists, people involved in politics, generally from a certain urban, intellectual background. But are they representative? Actually, no. Western and French media highlight those who resemble them socially and sociologically.

It seems logical to leave a place where you don’t feel good.

Yes, I know you believe that; it’s not about "not feeling good," but about being in your own country and treated like a foreigner, intellectually and civically.

On the other hand, the flow of political refugees between dictatorships and the West is significant. Reading some here, I wonder why?

To make money and return home, not to flee a dictatorship as such. I looked into emigration from Iran: it’s higher than from France, but not by huge margins—maybe 50% more—and it’s mostly educated and intellectual people. A brain drain, not an exodus.

Michel
AT Attila Globetrotter ·
not to flee a dictatorship as such.

So OFPRA is useless and all asylum applications should be rejected since they're economic?

You’re gonna be real popular with some far-right parties.

I’ll leave you to your dubious theories.
TA Tatra Globetrotter ·
So the OFPRA is useless and all asylum applications should be rejected because they're economic?

I never wrote that, but there’s a kind of narcissistic satisfaction in the French ideology of believing it’s envied and prized for its values, which borders on denial.

You’re going to make yourself very popular with some far-right political parties.

I don’t care. Is it hazy just because it’s not what the mainstream media feeds you?

Michel
AT Attila Globetrotter ·
I never wrote that

Oh really?

To make money and return home, not to flee a dictatorship as such.

You forget very quickly what you write.

It’s shady because you’re denying the suffering of millions of people who fled the country where they were born because they weren’t free there. (As a woman, as a sexual or religious minority, as an atheist, as a political opponent, as a cultural dissident, etc.)

In the case of Russia, fleeing also comes from not wanting to return home in a coffin after being forcibly enlisted in a "special operation."

I don’t know if I’ll ever travel to Russia. I missed the boat at the start of Putin’s reign. In the end, it’s worse today for an average traveler than in Soviet times. Much more uncertain.
MA Mathews Globetrotter ·
You’re funny. Let’s say you don’t share the values of the Republic in France; what are you then? You didn’t choose anything, didn’t ask for anything;

You’ll have to excuse me, but I’ve never understood what your problem is. Is it living in France? If so, you should do like the Americans who sue over anything—you could take your parents to court for not being born in Russia. That’d make you happy for sure 😉 As for democracy in France and freedom of expression, nothing’s stopping you from speaking Breton in Brittany or Basque in the Basque Country. Even better, you could publish a regional daily in the local language.
LA Lapagaille Veteran ·
Hello South, Central, or North American, or possibly Canadian? Just to clarify what you're saying! Why always relate everything to France? You’re not the center of the world. Best regards, Patrick
TA Tatra Globetrotter ·
As for democracy in France and freedom of expression, nothing prevents you from expressing yourself in Breton in Brittany or in Basque in the Basque Country. Even better, you should publish a regional daily in the local language.

I don’t fully understand your message—it’s rather confusing. I’d like to point out that all of my grandparents were forced, legally and especially socially, to stop passing on their language, their imagination, and their culture. In Russia or Iran, that would never have happened.

My problem? Right now, it seems to me that it’s more and more—and especially... yours.

Michel
TA Tatra Globetrotter ·
It’s sketchy because you’re dismissing the suffering of millions who fled the country they were born in because they weren’t free there. (As a woman, as a sexual or religious minority, as an atheist, as a political or cultural dissident, etc.)

I’m not dismissing anything, but the reason you’re citing isn’t the majority one—it’s sensationalized and feeds into a national narrative.

I don’t know if I’ll ever travel to Russia. I missed the boat at the start of Putin’s reign. In the end, it’s worse today for an average traveler than in Soviet times. Much more uncertain.

Back in Soviet times, there was already strong pressure not to go; you’ll see with Kazakhstan if you like it or not.

Michel
MA Mathews Globetrotter ·
I don’t fully understand your message—it’s rather confusing;

Uh, my message is as clear as it gets. What’s confusing about it? I clearly wrote that you can express yourself in any language you want in France—isn’t that clear enough? As long as you make yourself understood, of course. And my point applies to living in Canada, Belgium, or anywhere else.

Right now, it seems to me that it’s more and more, and especially... yours.

Now *that* I don’t get at all—what’s the meaning of your sentence? If anyone’s confused, it’s you 😉 I don’t have any problems. I love traveling and sharing that joy with other members of this forum.
TA Tatra Globetrotter ·
uh, my message is as clear as it gets. What’s confusing about it? I did write that you can speak any language you want in France—isn’t that clear enough?

It hasn’t always been this way. Even naming your children was often a problem and subject to many restrictions. I don’t think you really know what I’m talking about or what this is about. No big deal.

Michel
MA Mathews Globetrotter ·
Even naming one’s children was often a problem and subject to many prohibitions. I think you don’t really know what this is about or what I’m talking about.

Well yeah, it’s obvious because you’re talking about your personal life. And your personal life isn’t any of my business. How about sharing a nice travel journal about Russia instead of whining about your situation 😎 Show us photos of Orthodox churches, steppes landscapes... instead. I’d love to know what the Volga Delta looks like...
TA Tatra Globetrotter ·
Well yeah, it's obvious because you're bringing up your personal life. And your personal life is none of my business.

Not my personal life—it’s the lives of millions of people deprived of their culture, heritage, and imagination by an ideology. I’m not keeping a "travel journal"; tourism doesn’t interest me.

Michel
AT Attila Globetrotter ·
tourism doesn’t interest me.

Strange for the main poster on a travel forum.

But we’re well past that now.

Similar discussions

You might also like