The King of Thailand has died
FR

Translated into English.

32 321 Veteran ·
Monarchies on the brink - Thailand’s Rama X: the throne cracks
SA Sawadeebaht Regular ·
Hello,

I’d almost be mischievously tempted to ask if you’ve traveled to Thailand in the meantime.

Whether as a tourist or an expat, it’s clear that the topic of royalty isn’t a priority for Westerners—or for non-Thais in general, in my opinion. As for Thais themselves, and COVID certainly didn’t help, many are busy every day just trying to make ends meet and pay off loans, especially for their vehicles. Politics isn’t the first thing brought up in conversations, and even then, you’d need an advanced grasp of the language to discuss it.

A few scattered thoughts that come to mind: - In medieval Europe, royalty was considered divine right—meaning only God stood above the king, and the king ruled because it was God’s will. In Thailand, the royal status is at least on that level. - Thai law clearly defines lèse-majesté as a crime. Not only is it illegal to criticize the king, but also his family, and this can even extend to his pets. Ten years ago, a Swiss man—heavily intoxicated at the time—got the idea to vandalize posters of the king and his wife. He was sentenced to 10 years in prison. The sentence was halved only because he admitted guilt. The king did pardon him later, but spending time in a Thai prison, followed by deportation when you’re married to a Thai woman and have lived in the country for a decade… - It’s common for people who stay in Thailand for a while to develop a real fondness for its people. They have a spontaneity, kindness, and humor that’s rare in many other countries. It’s no surprise that many of us defend their faith, traditions, and the system they’ve built. Sure, some comments make it seem like certain people are *more royalist than the king himself*. Sometimes it’s a bit of naivety or sentimentality, other times it’s because they’ve adopted the country as their own. And what lessons can we really offer when we see how things are evolving back home? - This debate reminds me of discussions about boycotting airlines because they belong to nations that are supposedly plotting against us. In those debates, everyone’s right, and no one is. The only argument that seems hard to dispute is that those who choose to spend a large part of their lives in a country can’t—and shouldn’t—behave like its citizens. As many expats say, they’re just guests and shouldn’t meddle in political or even economic matters. In a way, it’s a sign of respect. - If you look into recent history, you’ll see that this king was behind many initiatives that benefited the population. I’m thinking of dams, local craft zones (OTOP—One Tambon, One Product), national parks, and generally helping Thailand enter the 20th century. He was also a calm, discreet man who made sure to be present, traveling the country and supporting victims of natural disasters. Several generations knew only this one king, and losing him felt like losing the father of the nation for all these reasons.

This topic once again highlights the culture clash. Sometimes, I think it’s best to keep these thoughts to yourself.

Similar discussions

You might also like