Air Canada versus Air France?
by Af388yul
This discussion is in French, the community’s main language.
Original post
Bon il se peut que j'aille à Paris bientôt pour un échange de résidence et il se peut que je le fasse avec Air Canada ou Air France. Mais j'aimerais savoir quelle est la meilleur compagnie aérienne entre Air Canada et Air France je sais qu'Air France est quoté 4 étoiles tandis qu'Air Canada est quoté 3 étoiles de plus il y a une vidéo de comparaison de AF avec AC qui se trouve au http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlF6ecXt7BA et je l'ai même commenté cette vidéo et mon nom d'utilisateur est Ahuntsicspotter sur youtube.
Pour moi, sans hésiter, Air Canada pour deux raisons :
- Le programme de fidélité plus intéressant que celui d'AF (en voyageant en PV ou en Eco) - La configuration plus agréable du B767, et même du A330 par rapport aux 777, 380, et pouvoir sortir assez vite a YYZ/YUL ou CDG (même si je ne me rappelle plus d'avoir un IFE individuel sur 767, qui est n'est pour moi quelque chose d'indispensable sur un vol de huit heures)
- Je ne parle pas de l'équipage, car il y a du bon comme du moins chez AF et AC, comme a la loterie et tout dépendra du CCP qui motivera ses troupes sur les deux rotations.
De toute facon, les deux compagnies se valent en classe Eco, a moins de voyager en Affaires
- Le programme de fidélité plus intéressant que celui d'AF (en voyageant en PV ou en Eco) - La configuration plus agréable du B767, et même du A330 par rapport aux 777, 380, et pouvoir sortir assez vite a YYZ/YUL ou CDG (même si je ne me rappelle plus d'avoir un IFE individuel sur 767, qui est n'est pour moi quelque chose d'indispensable sur un vol de huit heures)
- Je ne parle pas de l'équipage, car il y a du bon comme du moins chez AF et AC, comme a la loterie et tout dépendra du CCP qui motivera ses troupes sur les deux rotations.
De toute facon, les deux compagnies se valent en classe Eco, a moins de voyager en Affaires
Prochains vols :
Je pars dans 2 semaines pour quelques jours à Montréal avec AF ( pour prendre l'A380 ce que je n'ai toujours pas fait ) donc là, pas de choix, AC n'en a pas. De plus je vais voyager en PV, classe dont ne dispose pas AC.
Mais, l'été dernier je suis allé à Vancouver avec AC et les deux précédents voyages au Canada étaient, l'un sur AC, l'autre sur AF.
Pour moi, en dehors de l'intérêt ou non de cumuler des miles FB, les deux compagnies se valent, à ceci près :
- les 747 d'AF ne sont pas super confortables ( mais à priori en cours de rénovation ) - en revanche AF propose des vols en A380 ce que ne propose pas AC - idem, AF propose une classe PV qui n'existe pas sur AC - perso, la Classe "Super Affaires" d'AC est à mon sens plus confortable que l'Affaire d'AF si vous voyager en J : vrai lit plat, restauration de qualité identique, mais globalement je préfère le siège AC même s'il commence à dater ... - en éco, j'ai de meilleurs souvenir d'AC mais parce que mon point de comparaison est sur cette ligne le 747 d'AF ( même sur le pont supérieur ) cf plus haut. - pour l'équipage, c'est aléatoire, dans les 2 compagnies il y a du bon, voire du très bon, et du moins bon .... - pour le catering c'est comparable
Reste les prix, mais concurrence oblige, ils sont souvent très proches 😛
Ah, un détail, voyager avec Air Canada, c'est être un peu au Canada, surtout si on a la chance d'avoir un membre d'équipage francophone.
Pour moi, en dehors de l'intérêt ou non de cumuler des miles FB, les deux compagnies se valent, à ceci près :
- les 747 d'AF ne sont pas super confortables ( mais à priori en cours de rénovation ) - en revanche AF propose des vols en A380 ce que ne propose pas AC - idem, AF propose une classe PV qui n'existe pas sur AC - perso, la Classe "Super Affaires" d'AC est à mon sens plus confortable que l'Affaire d'AF si vous voyager en J : vrai lit plat, restauration de qualité identique, mais globalement je préfère le siège AC même s'il commence à dater ... - en éco, j'ai de meilleurs souvenir d'AC mais parce que mon point de comparaison est sur cette ligne le 747 d'AF ( même sur le pont supérieur ) cf plus haut. - pour l'équipage, c'est aléatoire, dans les 2 compagnies il y a du bon, voire du très bon, et du moins bon .... - pour le catering c'est comparable
Reste les prix, mais concurrence oblige, ils sont souvent très proches 😛
Ah, un détail, voyager avec Air Canada, c'est être un peu au Canada, surtout si on a la chance d'avoir un membre d'équipage francophone.
La majorité des 767 d'AC sont équipés de ptvs sur chaque siege et j'ai vu qu'AC a des cloisons en classe Affaires ce qui n'est pas le cas chez AF. En plus AF et AC ont maitenant des Boeings 787 Dreamliners en commande et j'ai très hâte de voir l'intérieur du Boeing 787 Dreamliner d'AC et d'AF. Je pense que AC aura un meilleur intérieur du Boeing 787 Dreamliner qu'AC.
Moi je dirrai que le système de diverstissement sur AC est plus petit que sur AF en raison de l'absence des jeux a jouer mais j'espère que tout celà sera amélioré le jour ou AC recevera son premier Boeing 787 Dreamliner en 2014. De plus AF propose des vols sur YUL en Airbus a 380 ça c'est vrai mais AC sur la même ligne ils le font en 77W et les 77W d'AC sont configurés 3x3x3 contre 3x4x3 pour AF. C'est vrai qu'à compter du 21 mai prochain on verra AC et AF utiliser des 77W sur YUL depuis CDG. Pensez vous de voir un Boeing 787 Dreamliner d'AC en France je pense qu'AC ira en France en Dreamliner et ça sera depuis YYZ et pas YUL ou ça pourrait être les deux. Pour ce qui est des prix il peut avoir des journées où AC est moins chèr qu'AF et d'autres le contraire mais plus souvent qu'autrement AC et AF sont plus chèrs que TS entre le Québec et la France. De plus avez vous vu la vidéo que j'ai mis sur ce forum? Si non voyez la et n'oubliez pas de laissez un commentaire.
@Grosnavion
surtout si on a la chance d'avoir un membre d'équipage francophone
Air Canada a l'obligation d'avoir un équipage francophone sur tous ses vols et le client peut exiger d'etre servi en français. La compagnie a été condamnée l'an passé à 12.000$CA d'amende pour avoir failli à cette mission auprès de deux passagers quebecois sur un vol, malgré le fait que les deux plaignants parlaient parfaitement anglais (du moins sur les chaines de télévision anglophones)
@Trigroudemvd Tous les vols vers Paris cet été sont opérés en Boeing 777-300ER équipés de PTV. Les quelques 767 qui n'en sont pas équipés sont en ligne sur des destinations loisirs, jamais sur la France. De plus, les 77W d'Air Canada ont une configuration plus agréable en 3-3-3
@Af388yul
Pensez vous de voir un Boeing 787 Dreamliner d'AC en France je pense qu'AC ira en France en Dreamliner et ça sera depuis YYZ et pas YUL ou ça pourrait être les deux.
Bonne question... J'espere également que oui, le Dreamliner vers Toronto serait une augmentation de la capacité par rapport au 767, vers Montreal serait de résorber la surcapacité à certaines périodes creuses. Réequilibrer les capactiés avec des Dreamliners permettrait de rerouter plus facilement les passagers en correspondance Canada-USA vers Toronto qui propose un meilleur hub. A voir également sur Montreal - Londres, Francfort la capacité mise en place. Peut etre les Dreamliners en basse saison permettront d'uniformiser la flotte de la compagnie à Montreal Je n'ai pas vu de rumeurs officielles... Mais le Dreamliner ne remplacera t il pas les 767 un peu anciens?
surtout si on a la chance d'avoir un membre d'équipage francophone
Air Canada a l'obligation d'avoir un équipage francophone sur tous ses vols et le client peut exiger d'etre servi en français. La compagnie a été condamnée l'an passé à 12.000$CA d'amende pour avoir failli à cette mission auprès de deux passagers quebecois sur un vol, malgré le fait que les deux plaignants parlaient parfaitement anglais (du moins sur les chaines de télévision anglophones)
@Trigroudemvd Tous les vols vers Paris cet été sont opérés en Boeing 777-300ER équipés de PTV. Les quelques 767 qui n'en sont pas équipés sont en ligne sur des destinations loisirs, jamais sur la France. De plus, les 77W d'Air Canada ont une configuration plus agréable en 3-3-3
@Af388yul
Pensez vous de voir un Boeing 787 Dreamliner d'AC en France je pense qu'AC ira en France en Dreamliner et ça sera depuis YYZ et pas YUL ou ça pourrait être les deux.
Bonne question... J'espere également que oui, le Dreamliner vers Toronto serait une augmentation de la capacité par rapport au 767, vers Montreal serait de résorber la surcapacité à certaines périodes creuses. Réequilibrer les capactiés avec des Dreamliners permettrait de rerouter plus facilement les passagers en correspondance Canada-USA vers Toronto qui propose un meilleur hub. A voir également sur Montreal - Londres, Francfort la capacité mise en place. Peut etre les Dreamliners en basse saison permettront d'uniformiser la flotte de la compagnie à Montreal Je n'ai pas vu de rumeurs officielles... Mais le Dreamliner ne remplacera t il pas les 767 un peu anciens?
Vous confirmerez sans doute, mais il me semble que le 767 revienne depuis YYZ sur CDG pour cet hiver 2012-2013, a moins d'un nouveau changement ?
Prochains vols :
Normalement oui...
Cette année le 77W semble etre engagé sur tout le service S12 alors que l'an passé la période était réduite, à voir si cela tiendra jusqu'à la fin du S12 (l'an passé un 333 avait été engagé quelques semaines)
Par contre YUL qui devait etre renforcé en biquotidien 77W+763 (contre 2x763 au S11) ne sera opéré qu'en quotidien 77W cet été (d'autres destinations européennes ont aussi eu des capacités réduites par rapport au S11)
Air Canada a l'obligation d'avoir un personnel francophone voir même bilingue malgré que certains de ses agents de bord sont unilingues anglophone. Même quand vous voyagez avec BA entre le Canada anglais et la Grande Bretagne ou vice versa, les information sur votre vol sont affiché en anglais et en français. Si AC refuse de servir en français ils sont hors la loi de plus si BA refuse de servir en français là ils en ont le droit. L'été dernier AC a effectué une liaison biquotidienne en Boeing 767 entre YUL et CDG et ils ont utilisé un 77W entre YYZ et CDG mais pour cet été AC utilisera seulement un 77W entre YUL et CDG mais pour l'été 2012 entre YYZ et CDG je ne sais pas. Mais la seule chose que je sais que pour l'été 2012 entre YYZ et CDG, AF passe en 772 que je ne sais pas s'il aura une première classe ou non. Pour le Dreamliner AC devra le mettre nonstop entre YYZ et ICN pour contrer KE qui vole nonstop entre YYZ et ICN mais AC fait avec le même avion YYZ-YVR-ICN en Boeing 767 et avec le Dreamliner AC devra envoyer un Dreamliner sur cette ligne des qu'ils le receveront et je pense qu'AC aurait reçu cette suggestion de sa partenaire OZ. Je peu donc dire que le Dreamliner est une augmentation de capacité mais AC attend un Boeing 787 Dreamliner model 8 avec 37 exemplaires livrables en 2014 pour l'instant don't je ne connais pas le mois et ni même mon ami de youtube qui travaille chez Boeing comme ouvrier ne le sais pas non plus et il cherche a obtenir le calendrier de livraison et si il l'obtient il pourra vous la donner je vais te le donner son adresse de courrier électronique qui est pearsonba5.7@comcast.net ou sa chaine youtube qui est www.youtube.com/pearsonba350 qui sont les 2 façons d'entrer en contact avec lui. Moi aussi j'ai une chaine youtube qui est le www.youtube.com/Ahuntsicspotter aller le voir il y a des très belles vidéos et n'oubliez pas de les commenter. C'est possible que les Boeings 787 Dreamliners uniformisent la flotte d'AC à YUL. C'est difficile a dire si AC fera YUL-CDG en Dreamliner mais AF pourra aller à YUL en Dreamliner et peut-être même AF enverra à YUL un Airbus a 380 et un Boeing 787 Dreamliner en même temps qu'un Airbus a 380. AF attends 25 Boeings 787 Dreamliners de model 9 et pas 8 comme AC.
Depuis le début du S12, CDG YYZ est opéré en 77W. Il semble que l'avion fasse YUL CDG YYZ / YYZ CDG YUL (peut etre pas systematique non plus!)
C'est vrai que Seoul est la seule destination asiatique non doublée de YYZ et YVR.
Je ne connais pas trop les Dreamliners... Mais les 767 commencent être un peu anciens, un remplacement est envisageable, sinon c'est une sacré hausse de capacité!
C'est vrai que Seoul est la seule destination asiatique non doublée de YYZ et YVR.
Je ne connais pas trop les Dreamliners... Mais les 767 commencent être un peu anciens, un remplacement est envisageable, sinon c'est une sacré hausse de capacité!
Merci pour cette information mais AF ira aussi en 772 à YUL à compter du 5 juin prochain sur le vol AF 348/349 qui se terminera au début du mois d'octobre au lieu de la fin. Mais aussi l'Airbus a 380 fera YUL 4 fois par semaine et pour le reste il y aura un 77W 9 fois par semaine excluant le dimanche avec une liaison quotidienne en 772. Je pense que sur YUL AF va pas bien avec la supréssion du vol 348/349 au début octobre au lieu de le faire à la fin. Aussi l'année dernière à pareil dâte sur YUL AF utilisait un 77W et un 744 et là AF vole sur YUL en 388 et 343 mais initialement AF a prévu de commencer l'horraire d'été sur YUL en 77W tous les jours sauf le mercerdi et en 388 tous jours et tous celà à compter du 25 mars 2012 mais il y a eu des changements AF a rapporté le 77W jusqu'au 21 mai et ils ont mi un 343 sur une base quotidienne pour une période allant du 25 mars au 20 mai avec un 388 tous les jours. Après le 21 mai, AF passe en 77W et 388 tous les jours jusqu'au 4 juin par la suite on réduit à 4 fois par semaine en 388, 9 fois par semaine en 77W et tous les jours en 772. Pour AC il y a eu une planification pour une liaison quotidienne en 77W et 767 entre YUL et CDG mais tout ça a été changé pour une seule liaison quotidienne en 77W. Aussi la ligne YUL-CDG aura TS plus souvent TS bouffe t'il des passagers à AC et AF? Je pense que oui puisque TS est souvent moins chèr qu'AC mais la flotte de TS est aussi vieille que celle d'AC et d'AF. Pour moi j'aimerais bein prendre un 388 pour aller à Paris. Je que j'en ai pas eu l'occasion au mois de septembre dernier et j'ai eu un 744 à place qui a prit la place du 388 d'AF le 5 septembre au 2 lieu du 3 octobre comme prévu initiallement. J'éspère qu'AF ne retournera pas à YUL en 744 cette année.
@Grosnavion
surtout si on a la chance d'avoir un membre d'équipage francophone
Air Canada a l'obligation d'avoir un équipage francophone sur tous ses vols et le client peut exiger d'etre servi en français. La compagnie a été condamnée l'an passé à 12.000$CA d'amende pour avoir failli à cette mission auprès de deux passagers quebecois sur un vol, malgré le fait que les deux plaignants parlaient parfaitement anglais (du moins sur les chaines de télévision anglophones)
Je sais qu'AC doit avoir des personnels francophones mais y a quand meme des gens qui n ont rien a faire ou qui sont prets a tout ( et n importe quoi ) pour se rendre interessant et gratter de l argent !
surtout si on a la chance d'avoir un membre d'équipage francophone
Air Canada a l'obligation d'avoir un équipage francophone sur tous ses vols et le client peut exiger d'etre servi en français. La compagnie a été condamnée l'an passé à 12.000$CA d'amende pour avoir failli à cette mission auprès de deux passagers quebecois sur un vol, malgré le fait que les deux plaignants parlaient parfaitement anglais (du moins sur les chaines de télévision anglophones)
Je sais qu'AC doit avoir des personnels francophones mais y a quand meme des gens qui n ont rien a faire ou qui sont prets a tout ( et n importe quoi ) pour se rendre interessant et gratter de l argent !
Non je ne me base pas sur la vidéo.
Je viens faire partager mon expérience AC récente ( je suis rentré le 20 avril de LAX)
Donc trajet : CDG-LAX via YYZ. Le vol s'effectue dans le premier tronçon en 777-300ER et dans le 2e tronçon je l'ai fait en A320, au retour j'ai fait LAX-YYZ en 767-300 et repris un 777 pour venir jusqu'à paris. Prix : 599 euros (réservation fin décembre 2011).
Ponctualité : entre CDG et YYZ nous avions 1h de retard, la compagnie n'y étant pour rien, cela était du au fait qu'un passager s'était sévèrement blessé à la tête en ouvrant les soutes à bagages au dessus des sièges. Le temps que les secours viennent le soigner, nous rations l'heure de notre décollage. Heureusement, la personne n'avait rien de grave même si bcp de sang coulait ... 1h de retard au décollage de YYZ direction LAX : là, aucune explication. ponctualité pour le vol LAX-YYZ, retard au décollage de 30 minutes pour le vol YYZ-CDG mais arrivé pile à l'heure. en conclusion, sur les 4 segments de vol on ne peut pas dire que j'ai été marqué par la ponctualité d'air canada, à la différence d'United qui en septembre m'avait agréablement surpris !
confort à bord : les sièges d'air canada sont, je trouve, spacieux en terme de largeur, ils disposent de pas mal de place pour les jambes (en tout cas pour mon mètre 76), même si leur aspect (espèce de cuir vieux) ne fait pas moderne. Tous les vols pris disposaient d'un IFE que je trouve performant même si l'écran tactile est lent. Le choix des films proposés, modernes (La dame de fer, the grenne lantern, la couleur des sentiments, Transformers 3, Les neiges du kilimandjaro ... ), est très satisfaisant, et normal pour une compagnie billingue, les choix en français sont les mêmes que ceux anglais (pour les films en tout cas).
Repas : comme sur bcp de compagnies en classe éco (hormis sans doute les asiatiques) le repas ne vous marquera pas, en tout cas rien de typiquement canadien. ce qui est dommage c'est que comme les compagnies US, il faille payer ses repas ou son grignotage sur les vols CANADA-USA ou intérieurs, qui peuvent parfois durer plus de 5h (notamment le YYZ-LAX). 9 CAD pour un sandwich et un mini paquet de chips, c'est limite du vol mais bon ...
Les Pilotes/PNC : Un seul pilotes parlait français (très bien d'ailleurs) sur les 4 segments de vol pris. Les autres étaient systématiquement traduits par un PNC. Concernant les PNC, la grande majorité parlent anglais, et ceux parlant français ne sont pas légion. Mais il y en a tjrs à bord. sur le Vol LAX-YYZ pour avoir des explications sur mon changement à YYZ, une hôtesse officiant en classe affaire à du se déplacer pour m'expliquer en français. En même temps je me l'explique sans doute par le fait que tous mes vols partaient de YYZ, une ville dans une province anglophone ...L'essentiel étant qu'ils aient du personnel francophone, ce qui me semble quand même normal pour un pays qui revendique 2 langues officielles.
Sentiment de sécurité : aucun problème la dessus, on se sent parfaitement en sécurité dans les avions d'Air Canada, que ça soit dans leur 777 très récents ou dans leur 767 qui le sont moins.
Conclusion : le seul problème quand on va aux USA avec Air Canada ce sont les contraintes administratives dans les 2 sens ce qui n'est pas le cas des compagnies US quand on fait une escale aux USA (pas au retour aux USA). Je m'explique : à l'aller, à Toronto : je descends de l'avion, je récupère mes bagages (aux USA généralement on récupère ses bagages après l'immigration), je passe l'immigration US, je passe les douanes US (à qui je remets ma déclaration), je dépose mon bagage sur les tapis connecting flight, je passe les contrôles de sécurité et je prends moin vol. Au retour, même schéma mais pour rentrer sur le territoire canadien (même si on est en transit) : je desends avion, immigration canadienne, douane canadienne, contrôle sécurité puis vol (les bagages, heureusement, suivent eux directement au retour). Mis à part cela ( mais qui du coup nécessite de calculer le juste temps de transit à l'aller comme au retour ) mon expérience Air Canada fut très agréable, c'est une compagnie que je reprendrais sans nul doute si je dois retourner en Amérique du Nord.
Ponctualité : entre CDG et YYZ nous avions 1h de retard, la compagnie n'y étant pour rien, cela était du au fait qu'un passager s'était sévèrement blessé à la tête en ouvrant les soutes à bagages au dessus des sièges. Le temps que les secours viennent le soigner, nous rations l'heure de notre décollage. Heureusement, la personne n'avait rien de grave même si bcp de sang coulait ... 1h de retard au décollage de YYZ direction LAX : là, aucune explication. ponctualité pour le vol LAX-YYZ, retard au décollage de 30 minutes pour le vol YYZ-CDG mais arrivé pile à l'heure. en conclusion, sur les 4 segments de vol on ne peut pas dire que j'ai été marqué par la ponctualité d'air canada, à la différence d'United qui en septembre m'avait agréablement surpris !
confort à bord : les sièges d'air canada sont, je trouve, spacieux en terme de largeur, ils disposent de pas mal de place pour les jambes (en tout cas pour mon mètre 76), même si leur aspect (espèce de cuir vieux) ne fait pas moderne. Tous les vols pris disposaient d'un IFE que je trouve performant même si l'écran tactile est lent. Le choix des films proposés, modernes (La dame de fer, the grenne lantern, la couleur des sentiments, Transformers 3, Les neiges du kilimandjaro ... ), est très satisfaisant, et normal pour une compagnie billingue, les choix en français sont les mêmes que ceux anglais (pour les films en tout cas).
Repas : comme sur bcp de compagnies en classe éco (hormis sans doute les asiatiques) le repas ne vous marquera pas, en tout cas rien de typiquement canadien. ce qui est dommage c'est que comme les compagnies US, il faille payer ses repas ou son grignotage sur les vols CANADA-USA ou intérieurs, qui peuvent parfois durer plus de 5h (notamment le YYZ-LAX). 9 CAD pour un sandwich et un mini paquet de chips, c'est limite du vol mais bon ...
Les Pilotes/PNC : Un seul pilotes parlait français (très bien d'ailleurs) sur les 4 segments de vol pris. Les autres étaient systématiquement traduits par un PNC. Concernant les PNC, la grande majorité parlent anglais, et ceux parlant français ne sont pas légion. Mais il y en a tjrs à bord. sur le Vol LAX-YYZ pour avoir des explications sur mon changement à YYZ, une hôtesse officiant en classe affaire à du se déplacer pour m'expliquer en français. En même temps je me l'explique sans doute par le fait que tous mes vols partaient de YYZ, une ville dans une province anglophone ...L'essentiel étant qu'ils aient du personnel francophone, ce qui me semble quand même normal pour un pays qui revendique 2 langues officielles.
Sentiment de sécurité : aucun problème la dessus, on se sent parfaitement en sécurité dans les avions d'Air Canada, que ça soit dans leur 777 très récents ou dans leur 767 qui le sont moins.
Conclusion : le seul problème quand on va aux USA avec Air Canada ce sont les contraintes administratives dans les 2 sens ce qui n'est pas le cas des compagnies US quand on fait une escale aux USA (pas au retour aux USA). Je m'explique : à l'aller, à Toronto : je descends de l'avion, je récupère mes bagages (aux USA généralement on récupère ses bagages après l'immigration), je passe l'immigration US, je passe les douanes US (à qui je remets ma déclaration), je dépose mon bagage sur les tapis connecting flight, je passe les contrôles de sécurité et je prends moin vol. Au retour, même schéma mais pour rentrer sur le territoire canadien (même si on est en transit) : je desends avion, immigration canadienne, douane canadienne, contrôle sécurité puis vol (les bagages, heureusement, suivent eux directement au retour). Mis à part cela ( mais qui du coup nécessite de calculer le juste temps de transit à l'aller comme au retour ) mon expérience Air Canada fut très agréable, c'est une compagnie que je reprendrais sans nul doute si je dois retourner en Amérique du Nord.
AC est un bon choix surtout les 777 d'AC ont une configuration de 3x3x3 en classe économique contre 3x4x3 pour les 777 d'AF qui volent nonstop entre CDG et LAX. Mais vous avez prit AC en raison du prix je sais que ça serait mieux de prendre AF mais c'était trop chèr.
Ça se peut surtout la configuration des Boeings 777 des 2 compagnies qui est très differentes comme par exemple un Boeing 777 d'Air France est configuré 3x4x3 et un Boeing 777 d'Air Canada est configuré 3x3x3.
effectivement mon critère premier était le prix ... le vol direct CDG-LAX m'était proposé 860 euros ce qui représente 260 euros de plus pour arriver (certes plus rapidement et confortablement, car sans escale) au même endroit. j'ai préféré les mettre dans la location de la voiture :-) tout est question de choix ^^
a prendre en compte:
1- classement des Cies les plus sures source JACDEC (Jet Airliner Crash Data Evaluation Centre) 2010:
- AC: 26eme
- AF: 41eme juste devant Air China !!!
2- a tout moment et pour n importe quel motif AF peut se mettre en grève, c est meme une "culture" dans l entreprise et ce malgre un salaire moyen (pilotes) pres des 15 000€ mensuels pour 560h de vols annuels (je vous laisse faire la division)
1- classement des Cies les plus sures source JACDEC (Jet Airliner Crash Data Evaluation Centre) 2010:
- AC: 26eme
- AF: 41eme juste devant Air China !!!
2- a tout moment et pour n importe quel motif AF peut se mettre en grève, c est meme une "culture" dans l entreprise et ce malgre un salaire moyen (pilotes) pres des 15 000€ mensuels pour 560h de vols annuels (je vous laisse faire la division)
Je connais un monsieur qui voyage entre YUL et CDG et il prend AC à la place d'AF par crainte de grève et sa mère qui vit à Paris fait la même chose pour les même raisons sans doute. De plus AC et AF attendent des Boeings 787 Dreamliners 2 models differents qui sont 37 models 8 pour AC et 25 models 9 pour AF.
Log in first, then come back to this page.
You might also like
Densha Otaku - Lesser-Known Regions
Two weeks under the Puglia sun
Return to Swedish Lapland: Trek on the Kungsleden and Crossing the Sarek
Off on a winter adventure in the American West!
3 weeks in Laos, at a relaxed pace
Draw Me Your Japan...
South Africa in safari mode: February/March 2026
Back in Tunisia (live account)
More discussions
Hello,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi there,
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
Hi,
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
Hi there,
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
Hi,
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
Hi,
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
Hello,
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
Hello,
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Hi everyone,
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
Hi there!
Has anyone taken the direct flight from CDG to Las Vegas with Air France?
Looking forward to your feedback!
Hey everyone,
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
Hi there,
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric
Hi there,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
Hi there,
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry
Hi there,
I have a question...
Has anyone managed to get a refund from Oman Air?
After a delayed flight, we missed our connecting flight to get home!! At midnight, the flight attendant booked us on a flight to Nice via Munich, even though we were in Munich and wanted to get back to Nice... Too tired from the trip, we didn’t notice the mistake!! The next day, of course, the booking wasn’t valid!! We had to pay again for the flight back to Nice... I’m really struggling!! I think they’re giving me the runaround!! I’ve sent several emails, tried Messenger and WhatsApp, but the only responses I get are: "We need to investigate!! We’ll get back to you in 15 days!!" It’s been over a month!!
I just sent a registered letter (LRAR) to their office at Paris Charles de Gaulle, which is still open!!
Do you have any other suggestions for me?
Thanks in advance for your help! Virginie
After a delayed flight, we missed our connecting flight to get home!! At midnight, the flight attendant booked us on a flight to Nice via Munich, even though we were in Munich and wanted to get back to Nice... Too tired from the trip, we didn’t notice the mistake!! The next day, of course, the booking wasn’t valid!! We had to pay again for the flight back to Nice... I’m really struggling!! I think they’re giving me the runaround!! I’ve sent several emails, tried Messenger and WhatsApp, but the only responses I get are: "We need to investigate!! We’ll get back to you in 15 days!!" It’s been over a month!!
I just sent a registered letter (LRAR) to their office at Paris Charles de Gaulle, which is still open!!
Do you have any other suggestions for me?
Thanks in advance for your help! Virginie
Hi!
Sri Lanka has announced it could run out of fuel in the coming weeks if the Strait of Hormuz remains blocked. The government has implemented a mandatory four-day workweek to save oil, and there are long lines at gas stations due to fears of an early shortage.
In Vietnam, the government has warned all airlines that flights will need to be reduced due to a lack of kerosene. The country imports two-thirds of its jet fuel from China and Thailand, but both countries have now banned exports out of fear of domestic shortages.
The state is asking airlines to plan ahead and park aircraft to drastically reduce operations, starting with domestic flights and then international ones. International carriers will also need to cut back on their rotations.
This will begin in the coming days. 🙁
Hi there,
I’ve got a long layover (about 10 hours) in Seoul on an upcoming trip.
I arrive from Phnom Penh at 7:20 AM and depart for Montreal at 6:00 PM.
First question: Will my checked baggage be transferred automatically? I have a single ticket from KTI to YUL (Air Canada ticket—KTI-ICN operated by Asiana (codeshare) and ICN-YUL by Air Canada).
Second question: I saw it’s possible to join free guided tours (Airport Transit Tour). What do you think of this kind of service? And is my "actual" layover time (accounting for security checks, check-in, etc.) enough to do one of these tours?
Thanks in advance to everyone who chimes in on this!
First question: Will my checked baggage be transferred automatically? I have a single ticket from KTI to YUL (Air Canada ticket—KTI-ICN operated by Asiana (codeshare) and ICN-YUL by Air Canada).
Second question: I saw it’s possible to join free guided tours (Airport Transit Tour). What do you think of this kind of service? And is my "actual" layover time (accounting for security checks, check-in, etc.) enough to do one of these tours?
Thanks in advance to everyone who chimes in on this!
Hi everyone,
I'm heading to Namibia next May. I'm planning to take a first flight from Paris to Johannesburg with Air France, departing at 11:20 PM and arriving at 11:05 AM in Johannesburg. Then a second flight from Johannesburg to Windhoek at 3:25 PM with South African Airways.
Four hours between the two flights seems enough to catch my connection, but a friend told me I should maybe take the 5:30 PM flight instead because I need to go through immigration, collect my luggage, and check in again. Apparently, I have to do this because I bought the two tickets separately (it's actually much cheaper).
What do you think?
Also, in terms of South African airlines, which one do you think is the most reliable between South African Airways and Airlink?
Thanks for your advice!!
So, even before starting my explanation, I’d like to introduce myself since this is my first post on the forum :) I’m Jérôme, a huge Asia enthusiast, and I’m currently in the process of moving to Japan with my family in 2028.
Now, onto the topic :)
We’re a family of four traveling together to Seoul, with two separate bookings.
Our original itinerary was: Madrid → Doha → Seoul (March 23–24)
The issue is that our entire outbound flight was canceled, and the airline simply rescheduled the Madrid → Doha leg. Now we’re left with an incomplete journey, with no solution to reach our final destination (Seoul).
Since then:
- Can’t modify flights online (technical error every time) - Can’t get help via chat or WhatsApp - Phone support is unreachable, and the usual French number isn’t working right now
We don’t want a refund. We just want to be rerouted to Seoul, as our original ticket promised.
We’re flexible:
- On dates (we can leave on March 21 or 22 instead of the 23rd) - On the itinerary (different layovers if needed)
Have any of you dealt with this before? Do you know how to unlock a booking in this case or get a rerouting? We’re considering going straight to the airport to resolve it at the Qatar Airways counter....
Thanks so much for your help! 😊
Now, onto the topic :)
We’re a family of four traveling together to Seoul, with two separate bookings.
Our original itinerary was: Madrid → Doha → Seoul (March 23–24)
The issue is that our entire outbound flight was canceled, and the airline simply rescheduled the Madrid → Doha leg. Now we’re left with an incomplete journey, with no solution to reach our final destination (Seoul).
Since then:
- Can’t modify flights online (technical error every time) - Can’t get help via chat or WhatsApp - Phone support is unreachable, and the usual French number isn’t working right now
We don’t want a refund. We just want to be rerouted to Seoul, as our original ticket promised.
We’re flexible:
- On dates (we can leave on March 21 or 22 instead of the 23rd) - On the itinerary (different layovers if needed)
Have any of you dealt with this before? Do you know how to unlock a booking in this case or get a rerouting? We’re considering going straight to the airport to resolve it at the Qatar Airways counter....
Thanks so much for your help! 😊
Hi,
We just received an email from Volotea saying our flight time has changed (by more than 2 hours).
The email states "you can request a free date change."
If I change the date, will the flight price stay the same as the original price, or will I have to pay the difference?
Specifically: Our flight on the 7th is 46.25 €, and the one on the 8th is 92.51 €. If we switch to the 8th, how much will we pay?
When I request the date change to the 8th, it says "No additional fees."
Thanks and have a great day! 🙂
Hi everyone,
We’re going on a Nile cruise.
My question:
We’re taking off from Brussels Airport to land in Cairo.
Then we have to catch a second flight to Luxor.
How does that work—do we pick up our luggage, do we have to exit and then re-enter the airport?
Thanks for your help, tips, and advice, etc.…