Tout ce qui ne me tue pas, me rends plus fort Ni dieux, ni maitres
Disparition d'un avion d'Air Asia
by Lemonk68
This discussion is in French, the community’s main language.
Original post
Un Airbus A320 faisant la liaison Surabaya-Singapour a disparu des radars cette nuit avec 162 personnes a bord.
raph
Tout ce qui ne me tue pas, me rends plus fort Ni dieux, ni maitres
Tout ce qui ne me tue pas, me rends plus fort Ni dieux, ni maitres
Un appareil de la division indonésienne du groupe AirAsia ... Indonesia AirAsia (vols QZxxxx)
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
les 1eres infos sur The aviation Herald
"Indonesia Asia A320 over Java Sea on Dec 28th 2014, aircraft went missing believed to have impacted waters"
http://avherald.com/h?article=47f6abc7&opt=0
http://avherald.com/h?article=47f6abc7&opt=0
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
bien d avoir nettoyé, pas vraiment de quoi plaisanter😠
bien d avoir nettoyé, pas vraiment de quoi plaisanter😠
+1 http://www.liberation.fr/monde/2014/12/28/l-avion-d-airasia-disparu-avait-demande-a-devier-de-sa-trajectoire-a-cause-de-la-meteo_1170826
......
A bord de l’appareil se trouvaient 156 Indonésiens, trois Sud-Coréens, un Français, un Malaisien et un Singapourien, selon la même source. Il y avait 138 passagers adultes, 16 enfants et un nourrisson.
......
Une femme de 45 ans a déclaré à l’AFP avoir six membres de sa famille dans cet avion: «Ils allaient à Singapour pour passer des vacances. Ils ont toujours volé avec AirAsia sans problème. Je suis choquée par la nouvelle et très inquiète à l’idée que l’avion ait pu s’écraser», a-t-elle dit.
+1 http://www.liberation.fr/monde/2014/12/28/l-avion-d-airasia-disparu-avait-demande-a-devier-de-sa-trajectoire-a-cause-de-la-meteo_1170826
......
A bord de l’appareil se trouvaient 156 Indonésiens, trois Sud-Coréens, un Français, un Malaisien et un Singapourien, selon la même source. Il y avait 138 passagers adultes, 16 enfants et un nourrisson.
......
Une femme de 45 ans a déclaré à l’AFP avoir six membres de sa famille dans cet avion: «Ils allaient à Singapour pour passer des vacances. Ils ont toujours volé avec AirAsia sans problème. Je suis choquée par la nouvelle et très inquiète à l’idée que l’avion ait pu s’écraser», a-t-elle dit.
Sawasdee Krap,
Résumé
http://www.ibtimes.com/airasia-flight-qz8501-goes-missing-trip-singapore-1768138
http://www.air-cosmos.com/2014/12/28/27608-l-accident-d-airasia-relance-le-suivi-des-vols-au-dessus-des-etendues-d-eau
http://www.inquisitr.com/1709372/airasia-qz8501-fuel-has-run-out-passenger-list-demographics-released/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N463DqLi_qI
http://www.inquisitr.com/1709372/airasia-qz8501-fuel-has-run-out-passenger-list-demographics-released/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N463DqLi_qI
oui , ya toujours des gros blaireaux pour plaisanter sur ces choses là.
bien d avoir nettoyé, pas vraiment de quoi plaisanter😠
Pourquoi me répondre Et en quoi mes propos étaient ils sur le registre de la plaisanterie !
Pourquoi me répondre Et en quoi mes propos étaient ils sur le registre de la plaisanterie !
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
je ne crois pas que ce soit toi qui était concerné , il s'agit un autre guignole qui a mis une remarque débile en nommant la compagnie Airasia "coulapic airways" tu vois le genre d'abruti .
Pour avoir écrit une aussi profonde débilité, le "guignol" en question doit...
- Soit avoir eu la malchance le pauvre bougre, d'avoir été trépané d'une assez importante partie de sa cervelle ! - Soit celle d'avoir eu dès la naissance un cerveau si infiniment petit, que le plus puissant des microscopes électroniques que le monde ait connu, soit malheureusement totalement incapable de pouvoir le détecter ?! 🤪
Quoi qu'il en soit... c'est bien Albert Einstein qui avait raison, en écrivant cela :
"Il n'existe que deux choses infinies, l'univers et la bêtise humaine... mais pour l'univers, je n'ai pas de certitude absolue"
Si l'affreux guignol repasse par là... faudrait qu'il puisse largement méditer cette pensée ! 😉 Si toutefois il en est encore capable ?! 😇 🤪
- Soit avoir eu la malchance le pauvre bougre, d'avoir été trépané d'une assez importante partie de sa cervelle ! - Soit celle d'avoir eu dès la naissance un cerveau si infiniment petit, que le plus puissant des microscopes électroniques que le monde ait connu, soit malheureusement totalement incapable de pouvoir le détecter ?! 🤪
Quoi qu'il en soit... c'est bien Albert Einstein qui avait raison, en écrivant cela :
"Il n'existe que deux choses infinies, l'univers et la bêtise humaine... mais pour l'univers, je n'ai pas de certitude absolue"
Si l'affreux guignol repasse par là... faudrait qu'il puisse largement méditer cette pensée ! 😉 Si toutefois il en est encore capable ?! 😇 🤪
ou soit , il n'a pas de cervelle du tout 🤪, mais là , on ne peut plus rien pour lui.
Les objets détectés en mer ne proviennent pas de l'avion d'AirAsia
http://www.rtl.be/info/monde/international/indonesie-les-debris-detectes-en-mer-sont-ceux-de-l-avion-d-air-asia--687793.aspx
les débris repérés dans la zone de recherche sont bien ceux de l'avion d'Air Asia disparu en mer de Java. Des objets de grandes tailles, comme une porte d'avion, un toboggan d'urgence, ou encore une grande boite de forme carrée qui pourraient être un des réservoirs de carburants. Une "ombre" qui serait celle de l'avion d'AirAsia a aussi été repérée au fond de la mer.
Jusqu'à 40 corps ont été repêchés.
les débris repérés dans la zone de recherche sont bien ceux de l'avion d'Air Asia disparu en mer de Java. Des objets de grandes tailles, comme une porte d'avion, un toboggan d'urgence, ou encore une grande boite de forme carrée qui pourraient être un des réservoirs de carburants. Une "ombre" qui serait celle de l'avion d'AirAsia a aussi été repérée au fond de la mer.
Jusqu'à 40 corps ont été repêchés.
fin septembre 2014, trajet Bali/Singapour après 3 semaines de découvertes de Bali avec la compagnie KLM.
Toute la durée du vol a été très éprouvante et même à certains moments effrayantes.
Pris dans des orages d'altitude, à plusieurs reprises l'avion à "décrocher", cela na duré que quelques secondes: hôtesses de l'air et passagers qui été debout ont été plaqués au sol, cris des passagers, tremblements de l'avion, par les hublots nous pouvions apercevoir les éclairs. Nous nous regardions avec ma femme sans un môt, agrippés au siège de devant.
Sans aucune annonce faite au préalable par le commandant de bord!
Attérissage également assez hard (aquaplanning, cris) sous des trombes d'eau et éclairs, l'avion c'est immobilisé immédiatement après attérissage environ 30 minutes sur la piste.
Tout le reste du trajet via Paris a été très angoissant de crainte de revivre cette expérience
Vous avouez que je suis un peu refroidi à reprendre l'avion moi qui pourtant n'avait jusque là aucune appréhension.
C'est la météo de région qui génère ce type de situation plus que la Cie ou d'avion ! et les zone orageuses sont très fréquentes surtout en fin d'aprem et soirée /nuit
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
ou se situes ces zones orageuses?Je pensait que c'était la saison sèche actuellement
ou se situes ces zones orageuses?Je pensait que c'était la saison sèche actuellement
Euhhhhhh pas si sèche que ça il y a des orages (ponctuels) et parfois très forts quasiment a longueur d'année, je n'ai pas souvenir d'avoir fait un voyage dans ces régions de gros orages et je ne choisi pas la saison dite "des pluies"
... les cartes météos sont en lien dans les 1ers post
Euhhhhhh pas si sèche que ça il y a des orages (ponctuels) et parfois très forts quasiment a longueur d'année, je n'ai pas souvenir d'avoir fait un voyage dans ces régions de gros orages et je ne choisi pas la saison dite "des pluies"
... les cartes météos sont en lien dans les 1ers post
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Cher Badoomba,
Ceci s'appele en anglais ITCZ, ou ZCIT en français.
C'est ce qu'on appelle la zone de convergence intertropicale, une zone de nuages qui se forme près de l'équateur (ainsi qu'au sud ou au nord de l'equateur). Selon des saison (et la position du soleil) il y a des variations et/ou des changements de la ZCIT. Mais en principe il y a presque toujours ces nuages de forte activité dans la region autour de l'équateur.
On peut tout trouver sur internet si on fait une recherche sur ITCZ ou ZCIT. Chris
Ceci s'appele en anglais ITCZ, ou ZCIT en français.
C'est ce qu'on appelle la zone de convergence intertropicale, une zone de nuages qui se forme près de l'équateur (ainsi qu'au sud ou au nord de l'equateur). Selon des saison (et la position du soleil) il y a des variations et/ou des changements de la ZCIT. Mais en principe il y a presque toujours ces nuages de forte activité dans la region autour de l'équateur.
On peut tout trouver sur internet si on fait une recherche sur ITCZ ou ZCIT. Chris
Un Airbus A320 faisant la liaison Surabaya-Singapour a disparu des radars cette nuit avec 162 personnes a bord.
Salut Raph!
« le pilote a réussi à atterrir sur la surface de l'eau ».
C'est ce qu'a déclaré à l'AFP Dudi Sudibyo, rédacteur en chef du magazine d'aviation Angkasa.
Selon lui...
« Le transmetteur de localisation d'urgence devrait fonctionner lors d'un d'impact, que ce soit sur terre, en mer ou sur un versant de montagne, et mon analyse est que cela n'a pas fonctionné car il n'y a pas eu d'impact majeur lors de l'atterrissage », a déclaré à l'AFP Dudi Sudibyo, rédacteur en chef du magazine d'aviation Angkasa. Selon lui, « le pilote a réussi à atterrir sur la surface de l'eau ».
Maintenant ça me rappel le MH370, ,, et pour cause ! deux traces de vidange du carburant avaient été décelé en mer tout près du Vietnam...j'imagine que cette nouvelle catastrophe pourrais permettre une relance sur le mystère MH370...
incluant possiblement que le pilote avait réussi à amerrir sur la surface de l'eau!?
On verra...
Salut Raph!
« le pilote a réussi à atterrir sur la surface de l'eau ».
C'est ce qu'a déclaré à l'AFP Dudi Sudibyo, rédacteur en chef du magazine d'aviation Angkasa.
Selon lui...
« Le transmetteur de localisation d'urgence devrait fonctionner lors d'un d'impact, que ce soit sur terre, en mer ou sur un versant de montagne, et mon analyse est que cela n'a pas fonctionné car il n'y a pas eu d'impact majeur lors de l'atterrissage », a déclaré à l'AFP Dudi Sudibyo, rédacteur en chef du magazine d'aviation Angkasa. Selon lui, « le pilote a réussi à atterrir sur la surface de l'eau ».
Maintenant ça me rappel le MH370, ,, et pour cause ! deux traces de vidange du carburant avaient été décelé en mer tout près du Vietnam...j'imagine que cette nouvelle catastrophe pourrais permettre une relance sur le mystère MH370...
incluant possiblement que le pilote avait réussi à amerrir sur la surface de l'eau!?
On verra...
...l'important n'est pas la destination mais l'expérience de ce que le voyage nous apporte...
Maintenant ça me rappel le MH370, , , et pour cause ! deux traces de vidange du carburant avaient été décelé en mer tout près du Vietnam...j'imagine que cette nouvelle catastrophe pourrais permettre une relance sur le mystère MH370...
incluant possiblement que le pilote avait réussi à amerrir sur la surface de l'eau
Salut , bonne année!
J'avoue ne pas comprendre tes deductions .....😕
incluant possiblement que le pilote avait réussi à amerrir sur la surface de l'eau
Salut , bonne année!
J'avoue ne pas comprendre tes deductions .....😕
Air Asia n'avait pas d'autorisation de vol ce jour-la! La compagnie risque d'etre interdit de vol dans toute l'Indonesie desormais...
raph
Tout ce qui ne me tue pas, me rends plus fort Ni dieux, ni maitres
Tout ce qui ne me tue pas, me rends plus fort Ni dieux, ni maitres
Air Asia n'avait pas d'autorisation de vol ce jour-la! La compagnie risque d'etre interdit de vol dans toute l'Indonesie desormais...
Sources ?
Sources ?
Vichy St-Yorre!😉 Le Net , pardi!
raph
Tout ce qui ne me tue pas, me rends plus fort Ni dieux, ni maitres
Tout ce qui ne me tue pas, me rends plus fort Ni dieux, ni maitres
Vichy St-Yorre!😉 Le Net , pardi!
Et ? Encore une fois, sources ? C'est à dire des liens. Simplement dire "le net" ne constitue pas une source valide.
Et ? Encore une fois, sources ? C'est à dire des liens. Simplement dire "le net" ne constitue pas une source valide.
Va sur le site du Figaro!😇
raph
Tout ce qui ne me tue pas, me rends plus fort Ni dieux, ni maitres
Tout ce qui ne me tue pas, me rends plus fort Ni dieux, ni maitres
http://www.franceinfo.fr/actu/monde/article/airasia-deux-parties-de-l-avion-reperees-en-mer-de-java-626227
L’annonce de la découverte des deux parties de l’avion a été faite peu après une révélation sur le trajet de l’appareil. Selon le ministère indonésien des Transports, le vol QZ8501 entre Surabaya et Singapour a emprunté le dimanche 28 décembre, un couloir de vol dans un créneau horaire, sans autorisation. Comment la compagnie aérienne a -t-elle pu effectuer ce vol sans l'aval de l'administration aérienner ? Aucune explication n'est avancée pour le moment, mais l'Indonésie annonce qu'elle va enquêter dès lundi sur tous les horaires de vols d'AirAsia.
L’annonce de la découverte des deux parties de l’avion a été faite peu après une révélation sur le trajet de l’appareil. Selon le ministère indonésien des Transports, le vol QZ8501 entre Surabaya et Singapour a emprunté le dimanche 28 décembre, un couloir de vol dans un créneau horaire, sans autorisation. Comment la compagnie aérienne a -t-elle pu effectuer ce vol sans l'aval de l'administration aérienner ? Aucune explication n'est avancée pour le moment, mais l'Indonésie annonce qu'elle va enquêter dès lundi sur tous les horaires de vols d'AirAsia.
Merci Tokara. C'est ce que j'appelle fournir une source valide.
En effet, si cela se confirme, cela n'augure rien de bon pour Air Asia.
Cher Olvier,
Je pense qu'il se réfère à cette information:
AirAsia used to have permission to fly the route daily, but the number of slots was cut for the period Oct. 26 to March 28 because the country was nearing its quota for flying people to Singapore, said Indonesia’s acting director general of aviation Djoko Murjatmodjo. He didn’t say if other airlines also had their slots reduced.
Mais je pense que ceci est juste une parfaite illustration dans quelle "pagaille" l'aviation en Indonésie se trouve en ce moment, mais en soi il n'y ait certainement pas de lien direct avec les causes de la perte de l'avion d'Air Asia.
Tout indique que pas mal de fonctionnaires essaient "se sauver" et ainsi se distancer de la responsabilité du crash.... Mais il faudra quand-même se poser la question de la surveillance (surveillance directe) de l'aviation en Indonésie par le régulateur de l'Etat?
D'accord qu'Air Asia avait (apparemment) pas l'autorisation de voler ce trajet - mais tous ces vols se sont fait dans la lumière du jour et bien visible à tout le monde..............où étaient ces fonctionnaires et aussi l'Etat de l'Indonésie? Probablement les mêmes fonctionnaires qui devaient contrôler la sécurité de l'avion et/ou les competences des pilotes.....? Je comprends très bien pourquoi ce pays figure sur la liste noire en Europe (sauf exceptions)....
A plus Chris
Je pense qu'il se réfère à cette information:
AirAsia used to have permission to fly the route daily, but the number of slots was cut for the period Oct. 26 to March 28 because the country was nearing its quota for flying people to Singapore, said Indonesia’s acting director general of aviation Djoko Murjatmodjo. He didn’t say if other airlines also had their slots reduced.
Mais je pense que ceci est juste une parfaite illustration dans quelle "pagaille" l'aviation en Indonésie se trouve en ce moment, mais en soi il n'y ait certainement pas de lien direct avec les causes de la perte de l'avion d'Air Asia.
Tout indique que pas mal de fonctionnaires essaient "se sauver" et ainsi se distancer de la responsabilité du crash.... Mais il faudra quand-même se poser la question de la surveillance (surveillance directe) de l'aviation en Indonésie par le régulateur de l'Etat?
D'accord qu'Air Asia avait (apparemment) pas l'autorisation de voler ce trajet - mais tous ces vols se sont fait dans la lumière du jour et bien visible à tout le monde..............où étaient ces fonctionnaires et aussi l'Etat de l'Indonésie? Probablement les mêmes fonctionnaires qui devaient contrôler la sécurité de l'avion et/ou les competences des pilotes.....? Je comprends très bien pourquoi ce pays figure sur la liste noire en Europe (sauf exceptions)....
A plus Chris
Bonjour Chris.
Le problème est… l'opinion publique. Le quidam moyen.
Même si le vol a été fait par erreur, même si la faute n'en incombe pas totalement à AirAsia, et même s'il n'y a aucune correlation entre le plan de vol et l'accident, pour le quidam moyen l'amalgame est vite fait.
Cher Olivier,
Tout à fait d'accord avec toi/vous! Je suis avec vous et je partage votre point vue!
Mais où il y a accident grave (avec une grande perte humaine) toutes ces choses arrivent.
A voir la perte du vol Air France entre Rio et Paris en 2009 et à voir la tragique perte du vol Air Algérie au Mali. L'opinion publique fait pression et est à la recherché "des coupables". Vite fait - bien fait. Et donc tout le monde (parmi les responsables) essaie se mettre à l'abri.
Mais fait est (bien souvent) que ces accidents sont de plus en plus des situations très complexes avec des problèmes et des défaillances à tous les niveaux (petits problèmes cumulés dans une chaine d'évènements). Chaine souvent bien complexe et avec bien des choses à régler partout, sur toute la chaine de sécurité. Donc attention à la simplification et à des conclusions hâtives......
Merci Chris
Tout à fait d'accord avec toi/vous! Je suis avec vous et je partage votre point vue!
Mais où il y a accident grave (avec une grande perte humaine) toutes ces choses arrivent.
A voir la perte du vol Air France entre Rio et Paris en 2009 et à voir la tragique perte du vol Air Algérie au Mali. L'opinion publique fait pression et est à la recherché "des coupables". Vite fait - bien fait. Et donc tout le monde (parmi les responsables) essaie se mettre à l'abri.
Mais fait est (bien souvent) que ces accidents sont de plus en plus des situations très complexes avec des problèmes et des défaillances à tous les niveaux (petits problèmes cumulés dans une chaine d'évènements). Chaine souvent bien complexe et avec bien des choses à régler partout, sur toute la chaine de sécurité. Donc attention à la simplification et à des conclusions hâtives......
Merci Chris
Tout à fait.
Il semble que les medias généralistes mélangent tout comme dab !
le vol Indonesia AirAsia SUB/SIN ne pouvait pas a voir décollé de SUB sans un plan de vol accepté (inclus par l'administration de l'aviation civile singapourienne) et introduit dans le système avec une route, des niveaux +++ ça n'a aucun sens !
Par contre ressort que la Cie ne semblait pas avoir les droits de trafic pour ce vol pour le jour de l'accident, droits accordés pour les Ma/Ja/Sa et accident un dimanche !
Une sombre affaire de $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ qui va surement permetre a l' Etat indonesien de se dire "non concerné" administrativement !
le vol Indonesia AirAsia SUB/SIN ne pouvait pas a voir décollé de SUB sans un plan de vol accepté (inclus par l'administration de l'aviation civile singapourienne) et introduit dans le système avec une route, des niveaux +++ ça n'a aucun sens !
Par contre ressort que la Cie ne semblait pas avoir les droits de trafic pour ce vol pour le jour de l'accident, droits accordés pour les Ma/Ja/Sa et accident un dimanche !
Une sombre affaire de $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ qui va surement permetre a l' Etat indonesien de se dire "non concerné" administrativement !
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Ok, il semble que l'autorisation de vol est été accordée en fait, mais par les autorités singapouriennes.
http://www.air-journal.fr/2015-01-03-crash-qz8501-les-autorites-singapouriennes-avaient-donnent-leur-aval-5132454.html
Suite aux révélations des autorités indonésiennes révélant que le vol QZ8501 d’AirAsia n’avait pas les autorisations nécessaires pour emprunter le couloir aérien entre Surabaya et Singapour, l’Autorité de l’aviation civile de Singapour (CAAS) a fait savoir aujourd’hui sur son site Internet qu’elle avait donné, de son côté, son approbation en vertu d’accord entre les deux pays.
Suite aux révélations des autorités indonésiennes révélant que le vol QZ8501 d’AirAsia n’avait pas les autorisations nécessaires pour emprunter le couloir aérien entre Surabaya et Singapour, l’Autorité de l’aviation civile de Singapour (CAAS) a fait savoir aujourd’hui sur son site Internet qu’elle avait donné, de son côté, son approbation en vertu d’accord entre les deux pays.
Log in first, then come back to this page.
You might also like
More discussions
Hello,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi there,
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
Hi,
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
Hi there,
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
Hi,
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
Hi,
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
Hello,
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
Hello,
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Hi everyone,
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
Hi there!
Has anyone taken the direct flight from CDG to Las Vegas with Air France?
Looking forward to your feedback!
Hey everyone,
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
Hi there,
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric
Hi there,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
Hi there,
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry
Hi there,
I have a question...
Has anyone managed to get a refund from Oman Air?
After a delayed flight, we missed our connecting flight to get home!! At midnight, the flight attendant booked us on a flight to Nice via Munich, even though we were in Munich and wanted to get back to Nice... Too tired from the trip, we didn’t notice the mistake!! The next day, of course, the booking wasn’t valid!! We had to pay again for the flight back to Nice... I’m really struggling!! I think they’re giving me the runaround!! I’ve sent several emails, tried Messenger and WhatsApp, but the only responses I get are: "We need to investigate!! We’ll get back to you in 15 days!!" It’s been over a month!!
I just sent a registered letter (LRAR) to their office at Paris Charles de Gaulle, which is still open!!
Do you have any other suggestions for me?
Thanks in advance for your help! Virginie
After a delayed flight, we missed our connecting flight to get home!! At midnight, the flight attendant booked us on a flight to Nice via Munich, even though we were in Munich and wanted to get back to Nice... Too tired from the trip, we didn’t notice the mistake!! The next day, of course, the booking wasn’t valid!! We had to pay again for the flight back to Nice... I’m really struggling!! I think they’re giving me the runaround!! I’ve sent several emails, tried Messenger and WhatsApp, but the only responses I get are: "We need to investigate!! We’ll get back to you in 15 days!!" It’s been over a month!!
I just sent a registered letter (LRAR) to their office at Paris Charles de Gaulle, which is still open!!
Do you have any other suggestions for me?
Thanks in advance for your help! Virginie
Hi!
Sri Lanka has announced it could run out of fuel in the coming weeks if the Strait of Hormuz remains blocked. The government has implemented a mandatory four-day workweek to save oil, and there are long lines at gas stations due to fears of an early shortage.
In Vietnam, the government has warned all airlines that flights will need to be reduced due to a lack of kerosene. The country imports two-thirds of its jet fuel from China and Thailand, but both countries have now banned exports out of fear of domestic shortages.
The state is asking airlines to plan ahead and park aircraft to drastically reduce operations, starting with domestic flights and then international ones. International carriers will also need to cut back on their rotations.
This will begin in the coming days. 🙁
Hi there,
I’ve got a long layover (about 10 hours) in Seoul on an upcoming trip.
I arrive from Phnom Penh at 7:20 AM and depart for Montreal at 6:00 PM.
First question: Will my checked baggage be transferred automatically? I have a single ticket from KTI to YUL (Air Canada ticket—KTI-ICN operated by Asiana (codeshare) and ICN-YUL by Air Canada).
Second question: I saw it’s possible to join free guided tours (Airport Transit Tour). What do you think of this kind of service? And is my "actual" layover time (accounting for security checks, check-in, etc.) enough to do one of these tours?
Thanks in advance to everyone who chimes in on this!
First question: Will my checked baggage be transferred automatically? I have a single ticket from KTI to YUL (Air Canada ticket—KTI-ICN operated by Asiana (codeshare) and ICN-YUL by Air Canada).
Second question: I saw it’s possible to join free guided tours (Airport Transit Tour). What do you think of this kind of service? And is my "actual" layover time (accounting for security checks, check-in, etc.) enough to do one of these tours?
Thanks in advance to everyone who chimes in on this!
Hi everyone,
I'm heading to Namibia next May. I'm planning to take a first flight from Paris to Johannesburg with Air France, departing at 11:20 PM and arriving at 11:05 AM in Johannesburg. Then a second flight from Johannesburg to Windhoek at 3:25 PM with South African Airways.
Four hours between the two flights seems enough to catch my connection, but a friend told me I should maybe take the 5:30 PM flight instead because I need to go through immigration, collect my luggage, and check in again. Apparently, I have to do this because I bought the two tickets separately (it's actually much cheaper).
What do you think?
Also, in terms of South African airlines, which one do you think is the most reliable between South African Airways and Airlink?
Thanks for your advice!!
So, even before starting my explanation, I’d like to introduce myself since this is my first post on the forum :) I’m Jérôme, a huge Asia enthusiast, and I’m currently in the process of moving to Japan with my family in 2028.
Now, onto the topic :)
We’re a family of four traveling together to Seoul, with two separate bookings.
Our original itinerary was: Madrid → Doha → Seoul (March 23–24)
The issue is that our entire outbound flight was canceled, and the airline simply rescheduled the Madrid → Doha leg. Now we’re left with an incomplete journey, with no solution to reach our final destination (Seoul).
Since then:
- Can’t modify flights online (technical error every time) - Can’t get help via chat or WhatsApp - Phone support is unreachable, and the usual French number isn’t working right now
We don’t want a refund. We just want to be rerouted to Seoul, as our original ticket promised.
We’re flexible:
- On dates (we can leave on March 21 or 22 instead of the 23rd) - On the itinerary (different layovers if needed)
Have any of you dealt with this before? Do you know how to unlock a booking in this case or get a rerouting? We’re considering going straight to the airport to resolve it at the Qatar Airways counter....
Thanks so much for your help! 😊
Now, onto the topic :)
We’re a family of four traveling together to Seoul, with two separate bookings.
Our original itinerary was: Madrid → Doha → Seoul (March 23–24)
The issue is that our entire outbound flight was canceled, and the airline simply rescheduled the Madrid → Doha leg. Now we’re left with an incomplete journey, with no solution to reach our final destination (Seoul).
Since then:
- Can’t modify flights online (technical error every time) - Can’t get help via chat or WhatsApp - Phone support is unreachable, and the usual French number isn’t working right now
We don’t want a refund. We just want to be rerouted to Seoul, as our original ticket promised.
We’re flexible:
- On dates (we can leave on March 21 or 22 instead of the 23rd) - On the itinerary (different layovers if needed)
Have any of you dealt with this before? Do you know how to unlock a booking in this case or get a rerouting? We’re considering going straight to the airport to resolve it at the Qatar Airways counter....
Thanks so much for your help! 😊
Hi,
We just received an email from Volotea saying our flight time has changed (by more than 2 hours).
The email states "you can request a free date change."
If I change the date, will the flight price stay the same as the original price, or will I have to pay the difference?
Specifically: Our flight on the 7th is 46.25 €, and the one on the 8th is 92.51 €. If we switch to the 8th, how much will we pay?
When I request the date change to the 8th, it says "No additional fees."
Thanks and have a great day! 🙂
Hi everyone,
We’re going on a Nile cruise.
My question:
We’re taking off from Brussels Airport to land in Cairo.
Then we have to catch a second flight to Luxor.
How does that work—do we pick up our luggage, do we have to exit and then re-enter the airport?
Thanks for your help, tips, and advice, etc.…






