Air France: moins d’A380 vers Montréal cet été
by Iban323
This discussion is in French, the community’s main language.
Je ne pense que cela soit une question de remplissage pour ces deux jours.
Sachant qu'il est plus simple d'annuler le vol de 10H30 pour en faire un seul à 13H30.
Sachant qu'il est plus simple d'annuler le vol de 10H30 pour en faire un seul à 13H30.
En attendant cet ete deja. Le CDG-YUL du 2 mai sera en B777 au lieu de l A380 prevu.
Je suis deçu. 🙁
Merci pour l'info !
Sait on pourquoi il y a ces changements ?
Sait on pourquoi il y a ces changements ?
Du 24/04 au 02/05, un ajustement du programme de vols entraîne des changements de type d'appareil (comprendre plus d'A380) sur IAD et YUL.
Du 17/05 au 29/05, même chose sur JFK, JNB et IAD.
Merci pour l info. Puisque voys semblez bien informe 😉 savez vous si j ai des chances de bien monter dans un A380 le 7 mai entre yul et cdg ? 🙂 Merci
Merci pour l info. Puisque voys semblez bien informe 😉 savez vous si j ai des chances de bien monter dans un A380 le 7 mai entre yul et cdg ? 🙂 Merci
En attendant cet ete deja. Le CDG-YUL du 2 mai sera en B777 au lieu de l A380 prevu.
Je suis deçu. 🙁
Et dire qu'on m'a chicané ici parce que je n'étais pas content de AF!
Pfft!
"😉😉"
ps: désolé pour vous
Et dire qu'on m'a chicané ici parce que je n'étais pas content de AF!
Pfft!
"😉😉"
ps: désolé pour vous
"Plus il y a de fous, moins il y a de riz"
Paris, Bordeaux, Bourgogne, Rhône, Alpes, Provence, Languedoc-Roussillon, Barcelona, Figueres, Belém, Sao Paulo, Manaus, Marajò, Soure, Joanes, Ilha de Mosqueiro, Cambu, Iccoraci, Costa Rica, Corse, México, Cuba, Thaïlande, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodge, Chine...
Je suis déçu ... pas encore mécontent 😛
Si j'arrive à bon port, à bonne heure, j'en resterai à la déception de ne pas avoir voyagé sur AF ! Ces billets en voyageur ont du me couter moins de 300 euros pour l'aller / personne. Il ne faut pas en demander de trop pour le prix. Le voyage en avion c'est beaucoup démocratisé ces dernières décennies ( même si ce n'est plus le cas ces dernières années avec la flambée du prix du baril ) ... on ne peut pas tout avoir quand même.
Mais bon, je reste prudent sur ce voyage, tant que je ne suis pas arrivé à bon port ..... on ne sait jamais 😉
Aujourd'hui le A380 est de retour sur la ligne AF344.
Attention, sur ces dates cela ne veut pas dire que tous les vols prévus en A380 pour ces destinations sont remplacés, mais certains d'entre eux seulement.
Il s'agit essentiellement d'une tension flotte suite aux retards de livraison d'Airbus.
Il s'agit essentiellement d'une tension flotte suite aux retards de livraison d'Airbus.
Tout ce qui ne vous tue pas peut faire l'objet d'un ACARS
Ces changements sont donc bien dus au retard de livraison des 2 A380 qui devaient rejoindre la flotte Air France en avril ?
Je suis déçu ... pas encore mécontent 😛
Si j'arrive à bon port, à bonne heure, j'en resterai à la déception de ne pas avoir voyagé sur AF ! Ces billets en voyageur ont du me couter moins de 300 euros pour l'aller / personne. Il ne faut pas en demander de trop pour le prix. Le voyage en avion c'est beaucoup démocratisé ces dernières décennies ( même si ce n'est plus le cas ces dernières années avec la flambée du prix du baril ) ... on ne peut pas tout avoir quand même.
Mais bon, je reste prudent sur ce voyage, tant que je ne suis pas arrivé à bon port ..... on ne sait jamais 😉
Fin mai, je vous parlerai de mes expériences avec DELTA, TAM et GOL prochainement...
Mais tarde!
"😎😎"
Fin mai, je vous parlerai de mes expériences avec DELTA, TAM et GOL prochainement...
Mais tarde!
"😎😎"
"Plus il y a de fous, moins il y a de riz"
Paris, Bordeaux, Bourgogne, Rhône, Alpes, Provence, Languedoc-Roussillon, Barcelona, Figueres, Belém, Sao Paulo, Manaus, Marajò, Soure, Joanes, Ilha de Mosqueiro, Cambu, Iccoraci, Costa Rica, Corse, México, Cuba, Thaïlande, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodge, Chine...
Pour l'instant au programme :
- Du 24 au 25 avril : AF344 / 347 en B777-300
- Du 26 avril au 01 mai inclus : AF344 / 347 en A380
- Le 02 mai : AF344 / 347 en B777-300
- Du 03 mai au 04 juin inclus : AF344 / 347 en A380
Au final le A380 n'aura été absent que le 24 et 25 avril puis le 02 mai.
- Du 24 au 25 avril : AF344 / 347 en B777-300
- Du 26 avril au 01 mai inclus : AF344 / 347 en A380
- Le 02 mai : AF344 / 347 en B777-300
- Du 03 mai au 04 juin inclus : AF344 / 347 en A380
Au final le A380 n'aura été absent que le 24 et 25 avril puis le 02 mai.
Oui mais on aurait pu avoir un Boeing 777-300ER sur le vol AF 346/347 du 5 septembre au 11 décembre 2011 au lieu d'un calis de 747-400.
Pour l'instant au programme :
- Du 03 mai au 04 juin inclus : AF344 / 347 en A380
Au final le A380 n'aura été absent que le 24 et 25 avril puis le 02 mai.
Bon, j ai pas de chance. J rate le A380 sur le cdg yul le 2 mai, j espere que je l aurai le 7 en rentrant.
- Du 03 mai au 04 juin inclus : AF344 / 347 en A380
Au final le A380 n'aura été absent que le 24 et 25 avril puis le 02 mai.
Bon, j ai pas de chance. J rate le A380 sur le cdg yul le 2 mai, j espere que je l aurai le 7 en rentrant.
Moi j'aimerais savoir pourquoi l'Airbus a 380 sera absent de YUL le 2 mai prochain?
Il a déjà était dit que c'était du à un problème de retard de livraison chez airbus qui entraîne un manque d'appareils disponibles.
Si ça continue comme ça, AF pourra avoir un Airbus a 380 sur YUL tous les jours sauf le mercredi. De plus la livraison du 7e et 8e Airbus a 380 à AF est prévu pour le 2e trimestre de 2012 source:http://plane.spottingworld.com/A380_production_list.
Si Air France ne va à YUL que 4 fois par semaines à partir de juin ce n'est pas par manque de flotte mais seulement une question de remplissage et de rentabilité.
Avec 8 A380 d'ici le mois de juin et 7 destinations prévues cet été, Air France peut très bien utilisé l'A380 sur YUL tous les jours mais ne le fais pas donc c'est clair.
Avec 8 A380 d'ici le mois de juin et 7 destinations prévues cet été, Air France peut très bien utilisé l'A380 sur YUL tous les jours mais ne le fais pas donc c'est clair.
C'est possible mais le manque de remplissage est du pour plusieurs facteurs la crise, la concurrence d'Air Transat, Corsair fly, Qatar Airways et autres. De plus les passagers qui utilisent AF depuis YUL sont majoritairement en correspondance et pas celui ou celle qui terminent à Paris. Air Transat draine des passagers à Air France sur le tronçon YUL-CDG-YUL et la raison pour la quelle Air Transat draine des passagers sur le tronçon YUL-CDG-YUL c'est à cause des prix très bas. Mais les agences qui organisent des circuits en France doivent délaisser Air Transat au profit d'Air France pour rentabiliser l'Airbus a 380 sur YUL. Peut-être qu'avec la fallite d'Air Transat, Air France pourra effectuer une liaison biquotidienne en Airbus a 380 sur YUL. De plus j'ai très hâte de voir le prochain horraire d'hiver puisque j'aimerais aussi savoir la fréquence de l'Airbus a 380 d'Air France entre Montréal et Paris lors du prochain horraire d'hiver.
... la raison pour la quelle Air Transat draine des passagers sur le tronçon YUL-CDG-YUL c'est à cause des prix très bas. Mais les agences qui organisent des circuits en France doivent délaisser Air Transat au profit d'Air France pour rentabiliser l'Airbus a 380 sur YUL. Peut-être qu'avec la fallite d'Air Transat....
Arrte la c'est du n'importe quoi de haut niveau, le A380 a Montreal commence a te monter a la tête ! ... drole que pour un quebecois tu ne saches pas que Air Transat est filiale d'un des + grands voyagistes canadiens alors il ne remplaceront pas la filliale transport Air Transat par Air France ! ... Transat A.T. inc. la maison mère de Air Transat n'est pas en mauvaise santé financiere, parier sur une faillite pour voir du A380 AF est completement stupide et mm insultant pour les personnels de la Cie . ... un des pbl du A380 de AF sur Montreal , surtout en saison estivale, est sa configuration, trop de sieges "classes avants ( F & C) pour la demande sur cette ligne, ça a déjà été dit mais visiblement tu ne lis pas les post du sujet !
L'equation est claire si il y a €€€/ $$$ donc des pax sur la ligne bien sur que AF positionnera un A.380 sinon ce sera vite du B777 ou autre machine et les A380 sur des lignes plus rentables
Arrte la c'est du n'importe quoi de haut niveau, le A380 a Montreal commence a te monter a la tête ! ... drole que pour un quebecois tu ne saches pas que Air Transat est filiale d'un des + grands voyagistes canadiens alors il ne remplaceront pas la filliale transport Air Transat par Air France ! ... Transat A.T. inc. la maison mère de Air Transat n'est pas en mauvaise santé financiere, parier sur une faillite pour voir du A380 AF est completement stupide et mm insultant pour les personnels de la Cie . ... un des pbl du A380 de AF sur Montreal , surtout en saison estivale, est sa configuration, trop de sieges "classes avants ( F & C) pour la demande sur cette ligne, ça a déjà été dit mais visiblement tu ne lis pas les post du sujet !
L'equation est claire si il y a €€€/ $$$ donc des pax sur la ligne bien sur que AF positionnera un A.380 sinon ce sera vite du B777 ou autre machine et les A380 sur des lignes plus rentables
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Moi je ne veux pas voir l'Airbus a 380 abandonner Montréal pour de bon moi je veux qu'il continue a desservir Montréal et je souhaite que Qatar Airways envoye un Airbus a 380 à Montréal don't ils attendent pour le 4e trimestre de 2013.
Moi je ne veux pas voir l'Airbus a 380 abandonner Montréal pour de bon moi je veux qu'il continue a desservir Montréal et je souhaite que Qatar Airways envoye un Airbus a 380 à Montréal don't ils attendent pour le 4e trimestre de 2013.
oh la ça commence a devenir grave 🙂 bon pour ma part j'arrete sur le sujet ! ... tu as oulié Singapore, Qantas, China Eastern, Emirates, lufthansa ... dans ton délire 🙂
oh la ça commence a devenir grave 🙂 bon pour ma part j'arrete sur le sujet ! ... tu as oulié Singapore, Qantas, China Eastern, Emirates, lufthansa ... dans ton délire 🙂
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
China Eastern Airlines na pas d'Airbus a 380 en commande mais China Southern Airlines en a déjà 3 et en attend 2 autres. De plus Lufthansa pourrait aller à Montréal en Airbus a 380 si la demande est assez forte. Aussi je tiens a dire que Qantas ne dessert pas Montréal. Mais Qatar Airways oui et Qatar Airways a des Airbus a 380 en commande. De plus British Airways qui dessert Montréal, attend 12 Airbus a 380 avec la première livraison au 2e trimèstre de l'année prochaine mais je ne pense pas que British Airways ira à Montréal en Airbus a 380. Si British Airways va au Canada en Airbus a 380, ça serait à Toronto, Vancouver ou voir même les 2.
Non mais il faut arrêter de croire que toutes les compagnies vont mettre des Airbus A380 sur YUL ! C'est clairement pas un marché porteur. J'aime bien Montréal (j'y ai vécu une couple d'années), mais ça reste une destination "secondaire" par rapport à des gros hubs comme CDG/JFK et bien d'autres.
Si AF a mis un A380, c'était essentiellement pour abandonner une rotation par jour et lisser ainsi ses coûts fixes. Mais bon au final, si cela passe sur la saison été, malgré la concurrence assez forte (Corsair et Air Transat notamment en clientèle Loisirs) c'est déjà plus dur en saison hiver.
Si AF a mis un A380, c'était essentiellement pour abandonner une rotation par jour et lisser ainsi ses coûts fixes. Mais bon au final, si cela passe sur la saison été, malgré la concurrence assez forte (Corsair et Air Transat notamment en clientèle Loisirs) c'est déjà plus dur en saison hiver.
Tout ce qui ne vous tue pas peut faire l'objet d'un ACARS
LOL, bon je pensais quand même que les Français aiment le Canada même si nous sommes d'accord, Montréal ne génère pas le même attrait ( et donc trafic ) que JFK
Moi ca ne me gène pas d'aller à YUL en 777 je pars mercredi pour la 4ème fois et ce ne sera encore pas cette fois en A380 😛.
Bon j'espère quand même que le 7 le 19h55 au départ de YUL sera quand même en A380 sinon j'arriverai jamais à monter dedans 😕
A 1 semaine du départ je vous confirme que c'est bien le A380 qui sera sur le vol AF347 le 07 mai à 19H55 ....
Après on n'est jamais sur , un problème technique est vite arrivé ... Mais je ne pense pas et j'espère pour vous
Après on n'est jamais sur , un problème technique est vite arrivé ... Mais je ne pense pas et j'espère pour vous
Non mais il faut arrêter de croire que toutes les compagnies vont mettre des Airbus A380 sur YUL ! C'est clairement pas un marché porteur. J'aime bien Montréal (j'y ai vécu une couple d'années), mais ça reste une destination "secondaire" par rapport à des gros hubs comme CDG/JFK et bien d'autres.
Si AF a mis un A380, c'était essentiellement pour abandonner une rotation par jour ... .
Notre amis Af388yul ne semble pas avoir compris malgré un bon paquet de posts de differents intervenants lui disant la mm chose Apres AF devra aussi gérer avec une seule rotation sur YUL le pbl du connecting au hub de CDG, si les "arrivants" d'Europe ou du MO ou ... ont trop a attendre ça reviendra peut etre vite a 2 rotations pour gerer ce trafic qui est different du point a point Peut etre que l'on comprend mieux pourquoi les Cies US preferent multiplier les vols en petits modules genre B757 que passez a une rotation unique avec de plus gros modules et visiblement ça n'est pas dans l'air d'arreter cette pratique elles cherchent un sucesseur au B757 peut etre un A321 NEO ou autre Boeing de le mm gamme !
Notre amis Af388yul ne semble pas avoir compris malgré un bon paquet de posts de differents intervenants lui disant la mm chose Apres AF devra aussi gérer avec une seule rotation sur YUL le pbl du connecting au hub de CDG, si les "arrivants" d'Europe ou du MO ou ... ont trop a attendre ça reviendra peut etre vite a 2 rotations pour gerer ce trafic qui est different du point a point Peut etre que l'on comprend mieux pourquoi les Cies US preferent multiplier les vols en petits modules genre B757 que passez a une rotation unique avec de plus gros modules et visiblement ça n'est pas dans l'air d'arreter cette pratique elles cherchent un sucesseur au B757 peut etre un A321 NEO ou autre Boeing de le mm gamme !
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
A 1 semaine du départ je vous confirme que c'est bien le A380 qui sera sur le vol AF347 le 07 mai à 19H55 ....
Après on n'est jamais sur , un problème technique est vite arrivé ... Mais je ne pense pas et j'espère pour vous
Je croise les doigts 🙂
Je croise les doigts 🙂
C'est très difficile a dire si AF enverra un Airbus a 380 à YUL lors de l'horraire d'hiver qui s'envient. Mais moi je pense que ouil.
Petit changement aujourd'hui sur le vol AF344 / 347 ou c'est finalement un B777-300 qui va a YUL au lieu de l'A380.
Pas d'autres changements pour le moment
- Du 24 au 25 avril : AF344 / 347 en B777-300
- Du 26 avril au 29 avril inclus : AF344 / 347 en A380
- Le 30 avril : AF344 / 347 en B777-300
- Le 01 mai : AF344 / 347 en A380
- Le 02 mai : AF344 / 347 en B777-300
- Du 03 mai au 04 juin inclus : AF344 / 347 en A380
Pas d'autres changements pour le moment
- Du 24 au 25 avril : AF344 / 347 en B777-300
- Du 26 avril au 29 avril inclus : AF344 / 347 en A380
- Le 30 avril : AF344 / 347 en B777-300
- Le 01 mai : AF344 / 347 en A380
- Le 02 mai : AF344 / 347 en B777-300
- Du 03 mai au 04 juin inclus : AF344 / 347 en A380
J'ai regardé les horraires des vols sur www.airfrance.ca et j'ai eu un 77W 2 fois pour demain et après demain.
Il est marqué tous les jours le 77W.
C'est toujours comme ça sur le site Air France , avant c'était que 388 même les jours ou il n'était pas là
C'est toujours comme ça sur le site Air France , avant c'était que 388 même les jours ou il n'était pas là
Gros retard aujourd'hui pour le retour de l'A380 sur la ligne après 1 jour d'absence !
Le départ du vol AF344 est prévu à 15H au lieu de 13H30 !
Les raisons d'après le site Air France :
En raison d'une adaptation nécessaire au déroulement du programme de nos vols, l'horaire du vol AF344 a été modifié.
Le départ du vol AF344 est prévu à 15H au lieu de 13H30 !
Les raisons d'après le site Air France :
En raison d'une adaptation nécessaire au déroulement du programme de nos vols, l'horaire du vol AF344 a été modifié.
Moi je ne veux pas voir l'Airbus a 380 abandonner Montréal pour de bon moi je veux qu'il continue a desservir Montréal et je souhaite que Qatar Airways envoye un Airbus a 380 à Montréal don't ils attendent pour le 4e trimestre de 2013.
Non mais af388yul, vous dites vraiment n'importe quoi! Premièrement de parler de faillite chez Air Transat et ensuite avec la citation ci-haut... On dirait un enfant! Moi je veux ça bon!!!
Non mais af388yul, vous dites vraiment n'importe quoi! Premièrement de parler de faillite chez Air Transat et ensuite avec la citation ci-haut... On dirait un enfant! Moi je veux ça bon!!!
Correct ça je ne veux pas perdre l'Airbus a 380 à Montréal. Je veux que l'Airbus a 380 déssert Montréal toute l'année.
Air France ayant reçu cette semaine son 7 ème A380, il n'y aura normalement plus de changements d'avions sur le vol AF344 / 347 à prévoir !
Un 8 ème A380 rejoindra la flotte ce mois ci !
Un 8 ème A380 rejoindra la flotte ce mois ci !
Le 7e Airbus a 380 d'Air France qui est immatriculé F-HPJG fera son premier vol sur LAX le 28 mai prochain.
Attention le 02 mai c'est le numéro :
F-HPJH qui a été livré à Air France !
Le numéro :
F-HPJG n'a pas été encore livré !
Donc à ce jour aucune information nous permet de dire lequel des deux ira à Los Angeles.
F-HPJH qui a été livré à Air France !
Le numéro :
F-HPJG n'a pas été encore livré !
Donc à ce jour aucune information nous permet de dire lequel des deux ira à Los Angeles.
Il y a des très bonnes chances que le F-HPJH aille à Los Angeles le 28 mai prochain moi j'aime les Airbus a 380 surtout ceux de Singapore Airlines j'ai très hâte de voir l'intérieur de l'Airbus a 380 de Malaysia Airlines immatricullation 9M-MNA.
C'est à partir d'aujourd'hui que le A380 de Air France ne vole plus que 4 jours par semaine vers Montréal YUL.
Aujourd'hui place au Boeing 777-300ER
Petit rappel :
Lundi / mercredi / samedi / dimanche : AF344 (aller) et AF347 (retour) : A380 Mardi / jeudi / vendredi : AF344 et AF347 : B777-300ER
Petite info supplémentaire :
Air France devrait recevoir demain son 8 ème A380 ! Et il n'y en aura plus d'autres en livraison avant l'année prochaine.
Aujourd'hui place au Boeing 777-300ER
Petit rappel :
Lundi / mercredi / samedi / dimanche : AF344 (aller) et AF347 (retour) : A380 Mardi / jeudi / vendredi : AF344 et AF347 : B777-300ER
Petite info supplémentaire :
Air France devrait recevoir demain son 8 ème A380 ! Et il n'y en aura plus d'autres en livraison avant l'année prochaine.
Justement mais aussi AF ajoute un autre vol quotidien à un et 6 hébdomadaires déjà présents en Boeing 777-200 avec un Boeing 777-300ER 9 fois par semaine et un Airbus a 380 4 fois par semaine.
AFP: Airbus A380 : la réparation des fissures requiert des semaines d'immobilisation
La réparation des fissures dans les ailes des super jumbo A380 d'Airbus demandera huit semaines d'immobilisation si elle est réalisée en une fois, rapporte dimanche la revue spécialisée FlightGlobal. Un porte-parole d'Airbus a déclaré à l'AFP que cette solution, retenue par la compagnie Emirates, prendrait "plusieurs semaines", sans confirmer le chiffre de huit semaines ou 30.000 heures de travail avancé par FlightGlobal. Ces microfissures, découvertes au début de l'année, ne présentent aucun danger pour les vols pour le plus gros avion de ligne au monde, insistent Airbus et l'Agence européenne de sécurité aérienne (AESA). La réparation des pièces métalliques sujettes à fissures dans la structure des ailes peut aussi être entreprise à l'occasion des "grandes visites", les entretiens des avions qui sont effectuées après deux, quatre et six ans de vol, ce qui perturbe moins les opérations, a souligné le porte-parole. "C'est aux clients de décider s'ils veulent mener les réparations en une fois ou en plusieurs étapes, a-t-il ajouté. Ils choisissent ce qui convient le mieux à leur opérations et répond le mieux à leurs besoins". L'avionneur s'est déjà engagé à supporter les coût des réparations mais refuse jusqu'à présent de payer des compensations pour immobilisation que demandent certains clients. Le porte-parole a confirmé qu'Emirates, le premier opérateur d'A380, avait choisi la réparation en une fois. La compagnie de Dubai a actuellement 21 A380 en service et en a commandé 90 au total. Les autres clients sont en train d'évaluer leurs options, a-t-il ajouté. Airbus est en train de produire les "pieds de nervure", des pièces métalliques en équerre dans les ailes, qui remplaceront les pièces défectueuses, pour les tester et les faire certifier. L'avionneur, numéro un mondial devant Boeing, prévoit de commencer les réparations chez les clients au début de l'année prochaine. Airbus commencera en 2013 à construire les ailes des prochains A380 avec un type d'aluminium qui évitera les fissures, "ce qui veut dire que les appareils livrés à partir de 2014" n'auront plus ce défaut, a expliqué le mois dernier le directeur des programmes Tom Williams. C'est à la livraison du 120e appareil que le problème aura été éliminé, selon lui. Airbus avait livré 75 A380 à la fin mai. Cet appareil à double pont, capable de transporter 500 passagers, a recueilli jusqu'à présent 253 commandes fermes. EADS a inscrit au premier trimestre de cette année une charge supplémentaire de 158 millions d'euros au titre des réparations des 71 appareils livrés à la fin mars. Il supportera des charges supplémentaires au fil des livraisons.
La réparation des fissures dans les ailes des super jumbo A380 d'Airbus demandera huit semaines d'immobilisation si elle est réalisée en une fois, rapporte dimanche la revue spécialisée FlightGlobal. Un porte-parole d'Airbus a déclaré à l'AFP que cette solution, retenue par la compagnie Emirates, prendrait "plusieurs semaines", sans confirmer le chiffre de huit semaines ou 30.000 heures de travail avancé par FlightGlobal. Ces microfissures, découvertes au début de l'année, ne présentent aucun danger pour les vols pour le plus gros avion de ligne au monde, insistent Airbus et l'Agence européenne de sécurité aérienne (AESA). La réparation des pièces métalliques sujettes à fissures dans la structure des ailes peut aussi être entreprise à l'occasion des "grandes visites", les entretiens des avions qui sont effectuées après deux, quatre et six ans de vol, ce qui perturbe moins les opérations, a souligné le porte-parole. "C'est aux clients de décider s'ils veulent mener les réparations en une fois ou en plusieurs étapes, a-t-il ajouté. Ils choisissent ce qui convient le mieux à leur opérations et répond le mieux à leurs besoins". L'avionneur s'est déjà engagé à supporter les coût des réparations mais refuse jusqu'à présent de payer des compensations pour immobilisation que demandent certains clients. Le porte-parole a confirmé qu'Emirates, le premier opérateur d'A380, avait choisi la réparation en une fois. La compagnie de Dubai a actuellement 21 A380 en service et en a commandé 90 au total. Les autres clients sont en train d'évaluer leurs options, a-t-il ajouté. Airbus est en train de produire les "pieds de nervure", des pièces métalliques en équerre dans les ailes, qui remplaceront les pièces défectueuses, pour les tester et les faire certifier. L'avionneur, numéro un mondial devant Boeing, prévoit de commencer les réparations chez les clients au début de l'année prochaine. Airbus commencera en 2013 à construire les ailes des prochains A380 avec un type d'aluminium qui évitera les fissures, "ce qui veut dire que les appareils livrés à partir de 2014" n'auront plus ce défaut, a expliqué le mois dernier le directeur des programmes Tom Williams. C'est à la livraison du 120e appareil que le problème aura été éliminé, selon lui. Airbus avait livré 75 A380 à la fin mai. Cet appareil à double pont, capable de transporter 500 passagers, a recueilli jusqu'à présent 253 commandes fermes. EADS a inscrit au premier trimestre de cette année une charge supplémentaire de 158 millions d'euros au titre des réparations des 71 appareils livrés à la fin mars. Il supportera des charges supplémentaires au fil des livraisons.
Merci pour ces informations mais d'où tenez vous tout ça?
Bonjour,
Dernière nouvelle: Air France abandonne le Airbus 380 sur Montréal à partir de cet automne:
http://www.radio-canada.ca/nouvelles/Economie/2012/06/11/010-airbus-fin-liaison-paris-montreal.shtml
Il reste cet été!
Dernière nouvelle: Air France abandonne le Airbus 380 sur Montréal à partir de cet automne:
http://www.radio-canada.ca/nouvelles/Economie/2012/06/11/010-airbus-fin-liaison-paris-montreal.shtml
Il reste cet été!
Pas étonnant !
Pas de problème en classe économie ou le taux de remplissage est élevé mais c'est au niveau de la classe affaire et de la première ou il y a pas assez de demande.
Logique donc !
heureusement que je pars cet été ...
Pas de problème en classe économie ou le taux de remplissage est élevé mais c'est au niveau de la classe affaire et de la première ou il y a pas assez de demande.
Logique donc !
heureusement que je pars cet été ...
Pas de problème en classe économie ou le taux de remplissage est élevé mais c'est au niveau de la classe affaire et de la première ou il y a pas assez de demande.
Logique donc !
heureusement que je pars cet été ...
Euhhhhhhh attends d'y etre pour etre certain ! ... j'avais evoqué cette situation, connue, de la faible demande des classes First et Biz sur Montreal et lorsque tu vois le peu de difference de pax offerts en Eco entre le A380 et le B777 COI il y a matiere a reflechier chez AF! c'est déjà fait pour l'automne et a mon avis ete 2013 risque de voir encore moins de A380 si la situation se confirme sur la saison !
Euhhhhhhh attends d'y etre pour etre certain ! ... j'avais evoqué cette situation, connue, de la faible demande des classes First et Biz sur Montreal et lorsque tu vois le peu de difference de pax offerts en Eco entre le A380 et le B777 COI il y a matiere a reflechier chez AF! c'est déjà fait pour l'automne et a mon avis ete 2013 risque de voir encore moins de A380 si la situation se confirme sur la saison !
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
L'Airbus a 380 d'Air France abandonne Montréal mais on ne sais pas encore si l'Airbus a 380 d'Air France viendra à Montréal l'été prochain en 2013. Aussi Air France en Airbus a 340-300 on a déjà eu ça avec un Boeing 777-300ER entre octobre et fevrier et rendu là Air France passait en Boeing 747-400. Vu que les 747 d'Air France sont prolongé jusqu'en 2016, il n'est pas impossible qu'Air France raméne un 747 à Montréal.
Je l'ai pris l'été passé et c'était une belle expérience.... Heureusement, parce que je ne pense pas que ce soit de nouveau possible avant longtemps. Trop de sièges au niveau des classes premières et affaires par rapport à la classe économique.
C'est une décision d'affaire qui était assez prévisible. Par contre, j'ai beaucoup aimé le B777 d'Air Canada. Je ne sais pas si la configuration est différente, mais il est plus agréable que le B777 d'Air France.
Log in first, then come back to this page.
You might also like
Trois semaines entre Montréal, Ottawa, New York et la Nouvelle AngleterreFR
Du Mont Royal au Vieux Montréal et Sainte-Anne de BellevueFR
De New York à Montréal par la côte!FR
Visite de Montréal, la ville souterraineFR
Le Canada en train, de Vancouver à Montréal avec le TranscanadienFR
Un séjour camping-car de Montréal à la GaspésieFR
More discussions
Great news for those heading to Bahia / Salvador toward the end of the year.
Air France plans to increase flights from 3 to 5 during the December 2026 / February 2027 period.
Original source: Salvador terá mais voos diretos para Paris durante o verão; veja o que muda | Jornal Correio 1
Tropical greetings from Salvador,
@IvanBahiaGuide
(local specialist, active on the French-speaking Brazil Forums for over 16 years now)
Hello,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi there,
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
Hi,
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
Hi there,
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
Hi,
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
Hi,
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
Hello,
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
Hello,
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Hi everyone,
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
Hi there!
Has anyone taken the direct flight from CDG to Las Vegas with Air France?
Looking forward to your feedback!
Hey everyone,
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
Hi there,
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric
Hi there,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
Hi there,
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry
Hi there,
I have a question...
Has anyone managed to get a refund from Oman Air?
After a delayed flight, we missed our connecting flight to get home!! At midnight, the flight attendant booked us on a flight to Nice via Munich, even though we were in Munich and wanted to get back to Nice... Too tired from the trip, we didn’t notice the mistake!! The next day, of course, the booking wasn’t valid!! We had to pay again for the flight back to Nice... I’m really struggling!! I think they’re giving me the runaround!! I’ve sent several emails, tried Messenger and WhatsApp, but the only responses I get are: "We need to investigate!! We’ll get back to you in 15 days!!" It’s been over a month!!
I just sent a registered letter (LRAR) to their office at Paris Charles de Gaulle, which is still open!!
Do you have any other suggestions for me?
Thanks in advance for your help! Virginie
After a delayed flight, we missed our connecting flight to get home!! At midnight, the flight attendant booked us on a flight to Nice via Munich, even though we were in Munich and wanted to get back to Nice... Too tired from the trip, we didn’t notice the mistake!! The next day, of course, the booking wasn’t valid!! We had to pay again for the flight back to Nice... I’m really struggling!! I think they’re giving me the runaround!! I’ve sent several emails, tried Messenger and WhatsApp, but the only responses I get are: "We need to investigate!! We’ll get back to you in 15 days!!" It’s been over a month!!
I just sent a registered letter (LRAR) to their office at Paris Charles de Gaulle, which is still open!!
Do you have any other suggestions for me?
Thanks in advance for your help! Virginie
Hi!
Sri Lanka has announced it could run out of fuel in the coming weeks if the Strait of Hormuz remains blocked. The government has implemented a mandatory four-day workweek to save oil, and there are long lines at gas stations due to fears of an early shortage.
In Vietnam, the government has warned all airlines that flights will need to be reduced due to a lack of kerosene. The country imports two-thirds of its jet fuel from China and Thailand, but both countries have now banned exports out of fear of domestic shortages.
The state is asking airlines to plan ahead and park aircraft to drastically reduce operations, starting with domestic flights and then international ones. International carriers will also need to cut back on their rotations.
This will begin in the coming days. 🙁
Hi there,
I’ve got a long layover (about 10 hours) in Seoul on an upcoming trip.
I arrive from Phnom Penh at 7:20 AM and depart for Montreal at 6:00 PM.
First question: Will my checked baggage be transferred automatically? I have a single ticket from KTI to YUL (Air Canada ticket—KTI-ICN operated by Asiana (codeshare) and ICN-YUL by Air Canada).
Second question: I saw it’s possible to join free guided tours (Airport Transit Tour). What do you think of this kind of service? And is my "actual" layover time (accounting for security checks, check-in, etc.) enough to do one of these tours?
Thanks in advance to everyone who chimes in on this!
First question: Will my checked baggage be transferred automatically? I have a single ticket from KTI to YUL (Air Canada ticket—KTI-ICN operated by Asiana (codeshare) and ICN-YUL by Air Canada).
Second question: I saw it’s possible to join free guided tours (Airport Transit Tour). What do you think of this kind of service? And is my "actual" layover time (accounting for security checks, check-in, etc.) enough to do one of these tours?
Thanks in advance to everyone who chimes in on this!
Hi everyone,
I'm heading to Namibia next May. I'm planning to take a first flight from Paris to Johannesburg with Air France, departing at 11:20 PM and arriving at 11:05 AM in Johannesburg. Then a second flight from Johannesburg to Windhoek at 3:25 PM with South African Airways.
Four hours between the two flights seems enough to catch my connection, but a friend told me I should maybe take the 5:30 PM flight instead because I need to go through immigration, collect my luggage, and check in again. Apparently, I have to do this because I bought the two tickets separately (it's actually much cheaper).
What do you think?
Also, in terms of South African airlines, which one do you think is the most reliable between South African Airways and Airlink?
Thanks for your advice!!
So, even before starting my explanation, I’d like to introduce myself since this is my first post on the forum :) I’m Jérôme, a huge Asia enthusiast, and I’m currently in the process of moving to Japan with my family in 2028.
Now, onto the topic :)
We’re a family of four traveling together to Seoul, with two separate bookings.
Our original itinerary was: Madrid → Doha → Seoul (March 23–24)
The issue is that our entire outbound flight was canceled, and the airline simply rescheduled the Madrid → Doha leg. Now we’re left with an incomplete journey, with no solution to reach our final destination (Seoul).
Since then:
- Can’t modify flights online (technical error every time) - Can’t get help via chat or WhatsApp - Phone support is unreachable, and the usual French number isn’t working right now
We don’t want a refund. We just want to be rerouted to Seoul, as our original ticket promised.
We’re flexible:
- On dates (we can leave on March 21 or 22 instead of the 23rd) - On the itinerary (different layovers if needed)
Have any of you dealt with this before? Do you know how to unlock a booking in this case or get a rerouting? We’re considering going straight to the airport to resolve it at the Qatar Airways counter....
Thanks so much for your help! 😊
Now, onto the topic :)
We’re a family of four traveling together to Seoul, with two separate bookings.
Our original itinerary was: Madrid → Doha → Seoul (March 23–24)
The issue is that our entire outbound flight was canceled, and the airline simply rescheduled the Madrid → Doha leg. Now we’re left with an incomplete journey, with no solution to reach our final destination (Seoul).
Since then:
- Can’t modify flights online (technical error every time) - Can’t get help via chat or WhatsApp - Phone support is unreachable, and the usual French number isn’t working right now
We don’t want a refund. We just want to be rerouted to Seoul, as our original ticket promised.
We’re flexible:
- On dates (we can leave on March 21 or 22 instead of the 23rd) - On the itinerary (different layovers if needed)
Have any of you dealt with this before? Do you know how to unlock a booking in this case or get a rerouting? We’re considering going straight to the airport to resolve it at the Qatar Airways counter....
Thanks so much for your help! 😊
Hi,
We just received an email from Volotea saying our flight time has changed (by more than 2 hours).
The email states "you can request a free date change."
If I change the date, will the flight price stay the same as the original price, or will I have to pay the difference?
Specifically: Our flight on the 7th is 46.25 €, and the one on the 8th is 92.51 €. If we switch to the 8th, how much will we pay?
When I request the date change to the 8th, it says "No additional fees."
Thanks and have a great day! 🙂
Hi everyone,
We’re going on a Nile cruise.
My question:
We’re taking off from Brussels Airport to land in Cairo.
Then we have to catch a second flight to Luxor.
How does that work—do we pick up our luggage, do we have to exit and then re-enter the airport?
Thanks for your help, tips, and advice, etc.…