Air France: indemnités pour un vol reporté?
by Voyageur2006
This discussion is in French, the community’s main language.
Original post
Bonjour
Je viens d'être informé (à 16h) par AF que mon vol sur GIG prévu pour 23h20 aujourd'hui est reporté à 8h30 demain matin en raison d'un pb de rotation de vol de l'avion.
Quelles sont les indemnités que doit verser AF pour cette raison?
Merci et bonnes fêtes de fin d'année!
Salut Voyageur 2006,
Normalement, en application des directives Européennes en vigueur (261-2004), AF est censée te proposer (car voyage de plus de 3500km et retard supérieur à 5 heures) :
- Une remboursement intégral de ton billet si tu souhaite annuler ton voyage avec la prise en charge vers ton point de dpart initial si tu est en correspondance a CDG. - A une prise en charge immédiate avec rafraichissements; repas et nuit d'hôtel (avec transfert inclus) - Une carte pour passer au moins deux appels téléphoniques
Tu ne pourras par contre prétendre à aucune indemnisation comme cela peut être le cas pour une surréservation ou un vol annulé... Mais rien ne t'empêche d'envoyer plus tard un courrier à AF pour demander un geste commercial, on ne sait jamais... !
Bon voyage quand même !
G.
Normalement, en application des directives Européennes en vigueur (261-2004), AF est censée te proposer (car voyage de plus de 3500km et retard supérieur à 5 heures) :
- Une remboursement intégral de ton billet si tu souhaite annuler ton voyage avec la prise en charge vers ton point de dpart initial si tu est en correspondance a CDG. - A une prise en charge immédiate avec rafraichissements; repas et nuit d'hôtel (avec transfert inclus) - Une carte pour passer au moins deux appels téléphoniques
Tu ne pourras par contre prétendre à aucune indemnisation comme cela peut être le cas pour une surréservation ou un vol annulé... Mais rien ne t'empêche d'envoyer plus tard un courrier à AF pour demander un geste commercial, on ne sait jamais... !
Bon voyage quand même !
G.
Mes vols en 2010 : http://openflights.org/user/palmanfr
Normalement, en application des directives Européennes en vigueur (261-2004), AF est censée te proposer (car voyage de plus de 3500km et retard supérieur à 5 heures)
Déjà traité ici... La Cour européenne prévoit désormais une indemnisation forfaitaire de 250 à 600 € pour tout retard de plus de 3 heures, sauf si la compagnie n'est pas responsable du retard (météo par exemple).
Déjà traité ici... La Cour européenne prévoit désormais une indemnisation forfaitaire de 250 à 600 € pour tout retard de plus de 3 heures, sauf si la compagnie n'est pas responsable du retard (météo par exemple).
Sauf erreur de ma part, il ne s'agit pas d'un refus d'embarquement, ni d'un déclassement, ni même d'une annulation* mais d'un retard "important" : plus de 5heures. La compagnie aérienne doit donc prendre en charge le passager comme expliqué précedemment (nuit d'hotel, repas, telephone etc...) et autoriser l'annulation du voyage = remboursement du passager dans les 7 jours ouvrés.
L'article 7 de la directive (261-2004) sur les indemnisation ne s'applique donc pas pour les retards importants.http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32004R0261:FR:HTML
* : Le site d'AF donne le vol AF442 d'aujourd'hui "annulé" et renuméroté AF442A avec un départ demain matin. Dans ce cas, est ce que l'on considère le vol retardé ou annulé ? Est ce qu'une nouvelle carte d'embarquement va-être délivrée ? Dans le cas ou le vol serait effectivement considéré annulé, il y aurait donc indemnisation ?
L'article 7 de la directive (261-2004) sur les indemnisation ne s'applique donc pas pour les retards importants.http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32004R0261:FR:HTML
* : Le site d'AF donne le vol AF442 d'aujourd'hui "annulé" et renuméroté AF442A avec un départ demain matin. Dans ce cas, est ce que l'on considère le vol retardé ou annulé ? Est ce qu'une nouvelle carte d'embarquement va-être délivrée ? Dans le cas ou le vol serait effectivement considéré annulé, il y aurait donc indemnisation ?
Mes vols en 2010 : http://openflights.org/user/palmanfr
* : Le site d'AF donne le vol AF442 d'aujourd'hui "annulé" et renuméroté AF442A avec un départ demain matin. Dans ce cas, est ce que l'on considère le vol retardé ou annulé ? Est ce qu'une nouvelle carte d'embarquement va-être délivrée ? Dans le cas ou le vol serait effectivement considéré annulé, il y aurait donc indemnisation ?
Retardé. C'est le même vol, renuméroté pour ne pas avoir 2 vols AF442 le même jour.
Retardé. C'est le même vol, renuméroté pour ne pas avoir 2 vols AF442 le même jour.
Contributions CC BY-SA
A man, a plan, a canal, Panama - palindrome, auteur inconnu
C'est donc un retard imputable à la cie donc
De te loger pour la nuit , de t'acheminer à l'hotel et demain à l'aeroport , une compensation financiere et un rebooking (ce qui est fait puisque le vol est reprogrammé le landemain)
WWW.GRANCANARIA.COM imaginez une ile !
Rio de Janeiro : AF442/27dec CDG 22h20 GIG 09h30. En raison d'une tension flotte, le vol est reporté au 28 décembre et re-numéroté : AF442A/28dec CDG 07h30 GIG 18h40
Si vous prouvez un préjudice, la convention de Montréal s'applique:
Retard des passagers Le transporteur aérien est responsable des dommages résultant d’un retard dans le transport aérien des passagers, sauf s’il a pris toutes les mesures raisonnablement envisageables pour les éviter ou s’il était impossible de prendre de telles mesures. La responsabilité est en ce cas limitée à 4 150 DTS (environ 5 100 euros) par passager.
Si vous prouvez un préjudice, la convention de Montréal s'applique:
Retard des passagers Le transporteur aérien est responsable des dommages résultant d’un retard dans le transport aérien des passagers, sauf s’il a pris toutes les mesures raisonnablement envisageables pour les éviter ou s’il était impossible de prendre de telles mesures. La responsabilité est en ce cas limitée à 4 150 DTS (environ 5 100 euros) par passager.
Mon carnet de vols
Si vous prouvez un préjudice, la convention de Montréal s'applique: .
Effectivement c'est cette convention qui s'applique dans ce cas. Donc il faut que le passager dépose plainte sur les bases de celle-ci et avec pièces a l'appui de son préjudice et sera dedommagé, si la justice lui donne raison sur cette base ! mais sans préjudice réél pas grand chose à esperer !
Effectivement c'est cette convention qui s'applique dans ce cas. Donc il faut que le passager dépose plainte sur les bases de celle-ci et avec pièces a l'appui de son préjudice et sera dedommagé, si la justice lui donne raison sur cette base ! mais sans préjudice réél pas grand chose à esperer !
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Bonjour,
Flyingblue a raison, désormais retards supérieurs à 3 heures et annulations sont indemnisés (ou plutôt devraient..) de la même façon dixit la Cour de Justice Européenne. Certaines compagnies ayant abusé du terme "retard" justement pour ne pas payer.
Bonjour
Merci pour toutes vos réponses et je vais faire un courrier à AF dès mon retour. D'ailleurs, je viens de recevoir un mél m'informant que la Cie m'offrait 3000 miles en geste commercial.
Généralement quand on obtient un geste commercial sans rien demander c'est qu'il y anguille sous roche.....
Je vous tiens au courant de la suite qui sera donnée!
Passez de bonnes fêtes de fin d'année....
Généralement quand on obtient un geste commercial sans rien demander c'est qu'il y anguille sous roche.....
Ou que ce geste ne coûte pas grand chose à la compagnie et permet de laisser penser au client qu'il est chouchouté.
Ou que ce geste ne coûte pas grand chose à la compagnie et permet de laisser penser au client qu'il est chouchouté.
Contributions CC BY-SA
Flyingblue a raison, désormais retards supérieurs à 3 heures et annulations sont indemnisés (ou plutôt devraient..) de la même façon dixit la Cour de Justice Européenne. Certaines compagnies ayant abusé du terme "retard" justement pour ne pas payer.
As tu des éléments qui permettent de confirmer ça, car a ma connaissance le droit intra-communautaire n'a pas encore été modifié et cette décision de la CJCE, intéressante pour le passager , n'est pour le moment qu'une jurisprudence dans le cadre d'une procédure, il y a en plus des restrictions a son application.
En cas de préjudice grave c'est souvent la convention de Montréal la plus intéressante l'indemnisation n'a pas de limite en type de vol … seulement en montant, ( +/-5000 €)
As tu des éléments qui permettent de confirmer ça, car a ma connaissance le droit intra-communautaire n'a pas encore été modifié et cette décision de la CJCE, intéressante pour le passager , n'est pour le moment qu'une jurisprudence dans le cadre d'une procédure, il y a en plus des restrictions a son application.
En cas de préjudice grave c'est souvent la convention de Montréal la plus intéressante l'indemnisation n'a pas de limite en type de vol … seulement en montant, ( +/-5000 €)
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Le 9/12 mon vol de Sao Paulo à Paris (18H15) a été annulé pour raisons techniques. On m'a trouvé une place sur le vol de 21H qui n'a décollé qu'à 22H15. Résultat : j'ai dû prendre le TGV vers Bruxelles à 16H10 au lieu de 9H15 (environs).
A Sao Paulo je n'ai pas reçu de repas ni boisson, à Paris j'ai reçu un bon pour un snack chaud ou froid ainsi qu'une boisson.
Suite à un courrier tranmis au service client d'Air France j'ai reçu 6.000 miles à titre de compensation et je peux rentrer les notes de frais pour les repas que j'ai payé de ma poche.
Bonjour,
Il s'agit effectivement d'une jurisprudence et l'arrêt de la CJCE a été rendu le 19nov2009.
Je ne sais pas si le réglement 261/2004 sera modifié pour inclure désormais les nouveaux droits des passagers ayant subi un retard important mais il est certain que la jurisprudence s'applique dés son arrêt.
Bien sur comme pour les vols annulés, les cies peuvent s'éxonérer de payer en invoquant les fameuses "circonstances extraordinaires".
Bien sur la Convention de Montreal est théoriquement complète et interessante. Mais qui en profite réellement et aprés combien d'années de procédure?
La volonté de la CE est clairement de standardiser les indemnités.
Indemniser peu mais vite et à tous
C'est chouette, non ? 😄
Bonjour,
Il s'agit effectivement d'une jurisprudence et l'arrêt de la CJCE a été rendu le 19nov2009.
Je ne sais pas si le réglement 261/2004 sera modifié pour inclure désormais les nouveaux droits des passagers ayant subi un retard important mais il est certain que la jurisprudence s'applique dés son arrêt.
Precise ... s'applique oui si un juge le decide mais autrement ??? c'etait ma question
Precise ... s'applique oui si un juge le decide mais autrement ??? c'etait ma question
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Ok, est-ce qu'une jurisprudence émanant d'une autorité telle que la CJCE peut être contestée par un juge de proximité ou un tribunal dinstance. Pour moi, non mais si un juriste pouvait nous préciser cela.
Bonjour,
Je pense que tu connais le reglement 261/2004 qui te donne droit a l'assistance (repas et reacheminement)
Le reglement ne stipule pas de plafond quant au remboursement des frais de repas donc si tu as des factures, la cie doit te rembourser.
Pour ce qui est de l'indemnité, à toi de réclamer (600€ tout de même!) et si la cie répond que les raisons techniques étaient indépendantes de sa volonté, elle doit le prouver.
Je vois que tu habites en Belgique, va faire un tour sur le site eccbelgium.be, tu peux obtenir des renseignements et de l'aide gratuitement!
Pour ce qui est de l'indemnité, à toi de réclamer (600€ tout de même!) et si la cie répond que les raisons techniques étaient indépendantes de sa volonté, elle doit le prouver.
Le vol n'a pas été annulé, il n'y a pas lieu à indemnités ici.
Le vol n'a pas été annulé, il n'y a pas lieu à indemnités ici.
Contributions CC BY-SA
Ok, est-ce qu'une jurisprudence émanant d'une autorité telle que la CJCE peut être contestée par un juge de proximité ou un tribunal dinstance. Pour moi, non mais si un juriste pouvait nous préciser cela.
C'est ce que je dis cette decision de la CJCE ne génère pas une indemnisation de la Cie "automatique" comme le fait le directive CE 261/2004 avec XXX € selon le vol, seul un juge, de proximité ou autre juridiction pourra en décider !
C'est ce que je dis cette decision de la CJCE ne génère pas une indemnisation de la Cie "automatique" comme le fait le directive CE 261/2004 avec XXX € selon le vol, seul un juge, de proximité ou autre juridiction pourra en décider !
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
je répondais à Blouch dont le vol a été annulé.
oui, tu as raison mais c'est tout de même une avancée importante.
Avancées très importantes ??
Dans un premier temps pour le consommateur oui.
Mais si les compagnies doivent payer à chaque retard, la facture risque de s'alourdir ! Imagines si il faut indemniser tous les passagers de l'A380 ? Si les incidents techniques ne sont pas une raison valable pour s'exonérer de l'indemnisation, le risque de faire voler des avions n'étant pas fiable est fort !
Et ne soyons pas naïf. Ces indemnités seront payées par les passagers au final. Il faut savoir que la marge des compagnies aériennes est très faible, parfois 2% les bonnes années, mais souvent déficitaires.
Rajoutons à ça l'augmentation du prix du kérosène, les taxes sur l'environnement, la taxe Chirac pour lutter contre le SIDA, les indemnités très fortes en cas d'accident avec des procédures judiciaires pour maximiser ces gains, parfois perdues, et l'explosion des couts de sureté... il ne va pas falloir se plaindre si les compagnies aériennes font faillite ou que les tarifs explosent !
Que les passagers soient protégés contre le surbooking et que des indemnités soient prévues c'est normal. Mais que tout retard soit indemnisé... N'y a t il pas de l'abus ?
C'est amusant de voir comme le transport aérien est le mouton noir dans de nombreux domaines et le plus attaqué.
Lorsque les tarifs aériens redeviendront à ceux des années 70, que de nombreuses compagnies auront fait faillite, que la concurrence n'existera plus et que les employés du secteur seront au chomage, on se rendra peut etre compte d'etre allé trop loin.
A titre personnel je suis un peu péssimiste pour l'avenir. J'ai l'impression qu'il faut profiter de l'avion pas cher actuel pour voyager. Je n'ai aucune raison de croire que cela va durer. Bon courage à tous ceux qui travaillent dans le secteur et attention aux turbulances très fortes !
Dans un premier temps pour le consommateur oui.
Mais si les compagnies doivent payer à chaque retard, la facture risque de s'alourdir ! Imagines si il faut indemniser tous les passagers de l'A380 ? Si les incidents techniques ne sont pas une raison valable pour s'exonérer de l'indemnisation, le risque de faire voler des avions n'étant pas fiable est fort !
Et ne soyons pas naïf. Ces indemnités seront payées par les passagers au final. Il faut savoir que la marge des compagnies aériennes est très faible, parfois 2% les bonnes années, mais souvent déficitaires.
Rajoutons à ça l'augmentation du prix du kérosène, les taxes sur l'environnement, la taxe Chirac pour lutter contre le SIDA, les indemnités très fortes en cas d'accident avec des procédures judiciaires pour maximiser ces gains, parfois perdues, et l'explosion des couts de sureté... il ne va pas falloir se plaindre si les compagnies aériennes font faillite ou que les tarifs explosent !
Que les passagers soient protégés contre le surbooking et que des indemnités soient prévues c'est normal. Mais que tout retard soit indemnisé... N'y a t il pas de l'abus ?
C'est amusant de voir comme le transport aérien est le mouton noir dans de nombreux domaines et le plus attaqué.
Lorsque les tarifs aériens redeviendront à ceux des années 70, que de nombreuses compagnies auront fait faillite, que la concurrence n'existera plus et que les employés du secteur seront au chomage, on se rendra peut etre compte d'etre allé trop loin.
A titre personnel je suis un peu péssimiste pour l'avenir. J'ai l'impression qu'il faut profiter de l'avion pas cher actuel pour voyager. Je n'ai aucune raison de croire que cela va durer. Bon courage à tous ceux qui travaillent dans le secteur et attention aux turbulances très fortes !
Avancées très importantes ?? Dans un premier temps pour le consommateur oui. !
Bof !! ça n'a que clarifié une des multiples directives européennes +/- obscures. ... apres l'application ??? et de tt façon le resultat se retrouvera rapidement dans le prix des billets, les Cies vont s'assurer sur ce type d'obligation, si obligation il ya , c'est aussi simple que ça !
Bof !! ça n'a que clarifié une des multiples directives européennes +/- obscures. ... apres l'application ??? et de tt façon le resultat se retrouvera rapidement dans le prix des billets, les Cies vont s'assurer sur ce type d'obligation, si obligation il ya , c'est aussi simple que ça !
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Le passager n'est pas l'ennemi de la cie, il est son client. Celui qui paye et qui reviendra s'il est satisfait. Dans sa grande majorité il est compréhensif, il peut attendre des heures sans broncher en salle d'embarquement pour peu qu'on lui donne des explications sur ce qui se passe. S'il voit que l'on s'occupe de lui, il ira même jusqu'à dire merci, sincèrement. Il est raisonnable et arrangeant (une chambre pour 2 ca ira, merci...non, pas de taxi on vient me chercher...pas de repas, je me débrouille, etc..)
Il vit dans un pays de droits et il en est fier.
Par contre il n'aime pas mais alors pas du tout qu'on le prenne pour un imbécile. Là, il se fâche et exige.
Pour reprendre ton exemple de l'A380, et bien, oui, si le retard est imputable à la cie, ça peut lui coûter cher, en effet. Un problème technique? Il y a les assurances. Une erreur d'organisation? faut assumer.
Et puis, 250-600€ c'est toujours moins que les 27500$ par pax d'amende que fait payer la FAA aux USA pour 3 heures et plus d'attente sur le tarmac!
Ils sont fous ces ricains! 😄
Et puis, 250-600€ c'est toujours moins que les 27500$ par pax d'amende que fait payer la FAA aux USA pour 3 heures et plus d'attente sur le tarmac!
C'est un projet hein 🙂
Ils sont fous ces ricains! 😄
Ils ont surtout eu un CRJ rempli de passagers qui a passé la nuit sur le tarmac... (oui la nuit).
C'est un projet hein 🙂
Ils sont fous ces ricains! 😄
Ils ont surtout eu un CRJ rempli de passagers qui a passé la nuit sur le tarmac... (oui la nuit).
Contributions CC BY-SA
Mais si les compagnies doivent payer à chaque retard, la facture risque de s'alourdir ! Imagines si il faut indemniser tous les passagers de l'A380 ? Si les incidents techniques ne sont pas une raison valable pour s'exonérer de l'indemnisation, le risque de faire voler des avions n'étant pas fiable est fort !
C'est deja arrivé ! http://www.crash-aerien.com/forum/lavion-vole-14-heures-avec-trois-moteurs-sur-quatre-vt1013.html
C'est deja arrivé ! http://www.crash-aerien.com/forum/lavion-vole-14-heures-avec-trois-moteurs-sur-quatre-vt1013.html
WWW.GRANCANARIA.COM imaginez une ile !
Le passager n'est pas l'ennemi de la cie, il est son client.
Certes. Mais le client n'est pas pret à accepter de payer plus d'une certaine somme pour voyager !
Et puis, 250-600€ c'est toujours moins que les 27500$ par pax d'amende que fait payer la FAA aux USA pour 3 heures et plus d'attente sur le tarmac!
600€ par PAX, pour un 380 complet ca représente une somme ! 322.800€ pour être précis avec la configuration Air France ! Je ne suis pas sur que le billet moyen hors taxe soit supérieur à 600€, ce qui veut dire que le prix des billets ne couvrira même pas la pénalité ! Et l'amende n'est pas pour avoir 3 heures de retard, c'est pour ne pas être retourné au terminal pour permettre aux passagers de débarquer !
Par contre il n'aime pas mais alors pas du tout qu'on le prenne pour un imbécile. Là, il se fâche et exige.
Il exige ?? Qu'il exige une prise en charge soit, une indemnisation forfaitaire, c'est un peu abuser !
Un problème technique? Il y a les assurances.
Certes, mais qui paye les assurances ?? Au final ce sera le client sur le prix du billet !
Ils sont fous ces ricains!
Pas plus fous que les européens qui avec une application trop stricte de la reglementation et la taxation de plus en plus forte de ce mode de transport risquent de mettre les compagnies en difficulté. Déja que les "couts externes" sont assez élevés et vont continuer à s'envoller (pétrole, sûreté)
Certes. Mais le client n'est pas pret à accepter de payer plus d'une certaine somme pour voyager !
Et puis, 250-600€ c'est toujours moins que les 27500$ par pax d'amende que fait payer la FAA aux USA pour 3 heures et plus d'attente sur le tarmac!
600€ par PAX, pour un 380 complet ca représente une somme ! 322.800€ pour être précis avec la configuration Air France ! Je ne suis pas sur que le billet moyen hors taxe soit supérieur à 600€, ce qui veut dire que le prix des billets ne couvrira même pas la pénalité ! Et l'amende n'est pas pour avoir 3 heures de retard, c'est pour ne pas être retourné au terminal pour permettre aux passagers de débarquer !
Par contre il n'aime pas mais alors pas du tout qu'on le prenne pour un imbécile. Là, il se fâche et exige.
Il exige ?? Qu'il exige une prise en charge soit, une indemnisation forfaitaire, c'est un peu abuser !
Un problème technique? Il y a les assurances.
Certes, mais qui paye les assurances ?? Au final ce sera le client sur le prix du billet !
Ils sont fous ces ricains!
Pas plus fous que les européens qui avec une application trop stricte de la reglementation et la taxation de plus en plus forte de ce mode de transport risquent de mettre les compagnies en difficulté. Déja que les "couts externes" sont assez élevés et vont continuer à s'envoller (pétrole, sûreté)
Log in first, then come back to this page.
You might also like
More discussions
Bonjour,
Je pense partir bientôt pour la Malaisie
J'ai vu des prix interessant et vol direct de Paris avec Malaysia Airlines
Est ce une compagnie fiable?
Merci pour vos retours
J'effectue régulièrement des voyages depuis plus de vingt ans
maís c'est la première fois qu'un compagnies me traite si mal que Air France.
Deux voyages, deux fois des problèmes. Le dernier:
Voyage de Séoul à Rennes. Dernière partie de París CDG à Rennes par Air France.
J'arrive à Paris et je me rends directement chez Air France pour obtenir la carte d'embarquement jusqu'à Rennes. On n'y assure que mon bagage suit jusqu'à Rennes.
Arrivé à Rennes, pas de bagage, comme c'est le cas de 5 personnes.
Le bureau d'Air France est fermé et le oersonnel de l'aéroport m'assure qu''il y a rarement quelqu'un.
Avec l'aide du personnel de l'aéroport, je fais une réclamation par internet et Mon bagage est quadi directement localisé, en conséquence je l'aurai le lendemain.
4 jours plus tard, le bagage est toujours au même endroitvà CDG, rien ne bouge.
Le problème est qu'Air France m'a pas de service clientèle. Ce qu'ils appellent service clientes, c'est un service qui répond après une heure et qui vous répète ce qu''il y a sur le FORMULAIRE informatique. Aucune coordination, aucune moyen de faire bouger les choses, je suppose que Air France préfère me payer l'indemnisation après 21 jours que se bouger le cul.
J'ai déjà eu des bagages égarés dans d'autres voyages maís c'est la première fois que je vous un tel je-m'en-foutisme foutisme et manque de professionalisme..
maís c'est la première fois qu'un compagnies me traite si mal que Air France.
Deux voyages, deux fois des problèmes. Le dernier:
Voyage de Séoul à Rennes. Dernière partie de París CDG à Rennes par Air France.
J'arrive à Paris et je me rends directement chez Air France pour obtenir la carte d'embarquement jusqu'à Rennes. On n'y assure que mon bagage suit jusqu'à Rennes.
Arrivé à Rennes, pas de bagage, comme c'est le cas de 5 personnes.
Le bureau d'Air France est fermé et le oersonnel de l'aéroport m'assure qu''il y a rarement quelqu'un.
Avec l'aide du personnel de l'aéroport, je fais une réclamation par internet et Mon bagage est quadi directement localisé, en conséquence je l'aurai le lendemain.
4 jours plus tard, le bagage est toujours au même endroitvà CDG, rien ne bouge.
Le problème est qu'Air France m'a pas de service clientèle. Ce qu'ils appellent service clientes, c'est un service qui répond après une heure et qui vous répète ce qu''il y a sur le FORMULAIRE informatique. Aucune coordination, aucune moyen de faire bouger les choses, je suppose que Air France préfère me payer l'indemnisation après 21 jours que se bouger le cul.
J'ai déjà eu des bagages égarés dans d'autres voyages maís c'est la première fois que je vous un tel je-m'en-foutisme foutisme et manque de professionalisme..
Hi there,
We had planned a trip to Sicily in August, and due to the volcanic eruption of Mount Etna, my flight was canceled. The airline is refunding the outbound flight, but none of the non-refundable expenses: accommodation booked through Booking, rental car, and the return flight aren’t covered. My SUPER Gold card doesn’t work in this specific case! :( If anyone has been in this situation, could you let me know if you were able to get any recourse and, if so, how?
Thanks in advance
Hello,
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August. My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August. My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi,
I booked an Etihad ticket on their website for Dusseldorf-Abu Dhabi. In the first name field, I entered all my first names (something I never do and I regret it, but the site was confusing). Everything is spelled correctly, but the problem is that I just received my new passport and only my first two first names and the first letter of the third appear—there’s no trace of the last one.
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in. Thanks for your feedback!
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in. Thanks for your feedback!
Hi everyone,
Next January, I’m heading to India.
My outbound flight is with Emirates from Paris to Dubai, then another Emirates flight from Dubai to Calcutta.
Could anyone tell me how the connection works? I’ve heard there’s a dedicated Emirates zone, but how does it actually work in practice—I’ve got a 2-hour layover.
Thanks so much!
Take care.
Hi there,
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon. I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport. Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…). AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly. On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double! In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others? Given the price difference, I’m hesitant… Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go? Thanks, HERVE
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon. I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport. Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…). AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly. On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double! In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others? Given the price difference, I’m hesitant… Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go? Thanks, HERVE
Hi everyone, I’ve unfortunately only just noticed that I booked two flight tickets, but I made a mistake on the second first name. Basically, my computer auto-filled and typed my first name twice, so both tickets are in my first name. Only the last names—mine and my friend’s—are correct.
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common). I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common). I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
Hello,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Hi there,
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
Hi,
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
Hi there,
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
Hi,
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
Hi,
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
Hello,
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
Hello,
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Hi everyone,
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
Hi there!
Has anyone taken the direct flight from CDG to Las Vegas with Air France?
Looking forward to your feedback!
Hey everyone,
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
Hi there,
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric
Hi there,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
Hi there,
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry







