Air France vs British Airways
by Af388yul
This discussion is in French, the community’s main language.
Original post
Moi j'ai prit Air France mais j'ai jamais prit British Airways et j'aimerais savoir c'est qui le meilleur entre Air France et British Airways. Oui en passant j'ai des vidéos de comparason entre Air France et British Airways au http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6Q81XIOknM, au http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxMgukukWxg et au http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrHmXgF0VBE regardez c'est vidéos pour déterminer c'est qui est le meilleur entre British Airways et Air France.
Moi j'ai prit Air France mais j'ai jamais prit British Airways et j'aimerais savoir c'est qui le meilleur entre Air France et British Airways. Oui en passant j'ai des vidéos de comparason entre Air France et British Airways au http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6Q81XIOknM, au http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxMgukukWxg et au http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrHmXgF0VBE regardez c'est vidéos pour déterminer c'est qui est le meilleur entre British Airways et Air France.
Merci pour ce grand moment d'anthologie de la culture Française.
PS : Vous voulez quoi au juste ?
Merci pour ce grand moment d'anthologie de la culture Française.
PS : Vous voulez quoi au juste ?
J'aimerais bein comparer Air France avec British Airways et aussi montrer les vidéos aux forumeurs de ce site.
Bon, j'ai fait plusieurs fois San Francisco/Londres avec British airways et San Francisco/Paris avec Air France. La seule difference est que les repas sont meilleurs sur Air France.
Quand vous avez prit Air France et British Airways, avez vous eu un Boeing 747-400 en classe économique. Je sais que tout les Boeing 747-400 de British Airways sont tous équipés d'écrans individuels en classe économique chez Air France ce n'est pas encore le cas pour les Boeings 747-400. De plus British Airways charge des frais pour les selections de sieges ce qui n'est pas le cas chez Air France et aussi British Airways a une flotte plus vieille que celle d'Air France.
Pour British Airways, en classe Economique, je suis sur que chaque siège est équipé d'un écran individuel (avec des programmes en français, genre 7-8 films). Je sais également BA est en train de refaire sa classe économique petit à petit depuis 5-6 mois. Donc si tu tombes sur un appareil équipé, c'est bingot et ca sent le neuf !!
Concernant l'attribution de sièges, il est payant à l'avance si tu n'es pas membre Executive Club et reste gratuit 24 heures avant le départ quand on s'enregistre en ligne. AF doit faire pareil non ?
Pour les repas, ca me parait du même genre : moyen sur les 2 compagnies.
Par contre, en classe affaires, y a pas photo : c'est direct BA avec un siège plat et horizontal alors que le siège d'AF est plat mais pas horizontal, tu dors en pente douce quoi ^^
Pour l'age de la flotte, je n'en sais rien.
Concernant l'attribution de sièges, il est payant à l'avance si tu n'es pas membre Executive Club et reste gratuit 24 heures avant le départ quand on s'enregistre en ligne. AF doit faire pareil non ?
Pour les repas, ca me parait du même genre : moyen sur les 2 compagnies.
Par contre, en classe affaires, y a pas photo : c'est direct BA avec un siège plat et horizontal alors que le siège d'AF est plat mais pas horizontal, tu dors en pente douce quoi ^^
Pour l'age de la flotte, je n'en sais rien.
Je me permets de rajouter que chez AF, il est possible de payer l'option Siège Plus a la fin de la réservation et d'avoir une place au pont supérieur.
Prochains vols :
British Airways loin devant pour le produit affaires tant en long courrier qu'en Europe. Le point faible de BA était le catering, et ce toutes classes confondues, meme si ca s'améliore. En Club Europe, ce n'est pas si mal, et meme excellent comparé a l'offre d'AF en Premium Affaires.
Salon: léger avantage pour les Galleries a LHR par rapport au salon du 2E a Paris, car il y a plus de catering chaud. Mais pas vraiment significatif. En premiere, le salon de CDG est mieux que la Concorde Room. A Londres, tb salon d'AF toutefois au terminal 4, avec un catering meilleur qu'au 2E et que le salon Admirals qu'utilise BA a CDG.
Aeroports: je trouve le T5 et le T2E assez pratiques, meme si ca reste un cran en dessous du top asiatique. On passe plutot rapidement de l'entree a l'avion, des lors qu'on n'est pas au T5B/C ou S3 a CDG. Fast Track a Londres marche plutot mieux qu'Acces numero 1 qui peut etre implemente sans reelle efficacite
Siege: BA loin devant, le siege est top, tu te reposes reellement, a l'horizontal. En voyageant en couple, les deux sieges du milieu (qui sont tous les deux dans le sens inverse de la marche) au pont principal sont vraiment ideal (pas de separation et cloisons amovibles avec les sieges couloir). En solo, le pont superieur est le mieux, 64K le plus pratique. Pas de pre-reservation gratuite du siege sur BA en dessous du statut bronze enr evanche, un peu frustrant pour le premier voyage en business quand on n'a pas de statut
Programme de fidelite: un peu plus de miles avec Air France (175%) mais le bareme pour les depenser est beaucoup moins avantageux. Avec BA, combiné a la carte Amex BA cobrandée, tu as un voucher 2 for 1 tous les ans, ce qui te fait que tu peux prendre un billet prime pour 2 en ne payant les miles que pour un seul billet une fois par an. Donc LHR-JFK AR en premiere pour 120 000 miles a 2 (ou 80 000 en affaires), c'est incroyablement attractif par rapport a AF qui me demande 100 000 miles pour un AR en affaires pour une seule personne... les "taxes" sont prohibitives dans les 2 cas, les 2 compagnies incluant les surcharges carburant et facturent donc l'equivalent d'un AR en promo en eco sur tous les billets "gratuits" (sic!).
Equipage: variable sur les 2, meme si - c'est subjectif - l'amplitude est un peu plus grande chez AF (j'ai vraiment tout eu, du pire au plus chaleureux) et que j'ai l'impression que c'est un peu plus consistant sur BA (je n'ai jamais eu de souvenir vraiment extraordinaire, juste des gens qui font tb leur travail au mieux et jamais rien de grave/ choquant non plus)
Un detail important a mes yeux, quand tu es passager frequent et que tu as une resa en world traveler plus, en cas de surbooking operationnel, tu passes avant les employes qui voyagent pour raisons perso (GP) et tu as potentiellement le droit a un surclassement ce qui est toujours une bonne surprise. Ils proposent des surclassements payants sinon (comme AF en fonction de la dispo en LC), mais avec AF on te laisse les miles de ta classe d'origine alors que chez BA on t'attribue les miles de ta classe de voyage quand le surclassement a ete paye. tous ces petits details en disent long sur la philosophie des maisons respectives.
En cas de pepin operationnel, j'ai enormement apprecie le service client BA. Tant AF que BA sont tres reactifs avec l'email/ ROC pour te prevenir et rebooker sur les premiers vols dispo en cas d'annulation, mais pour un vol en affaires en Europe, AF m'envoie a l'Holiday Inn de l'aeroport pour attendre le lendemain, alors que BA m'offre le Mandarin Oriental Downtown, tranferts en taxi etc. Pour se faire rembourser, AF me demande (i) de passer au comptoir de l'aeroport, (ii) d'envoyer les originaux de factures/ repas par courrier a Beauvais, bref le monde de 1990... alors que BA me dit au telephone de tout payer moi meme, pas de detour par le comtoir aeroport et d'envoyer un scan par email. Ils m'ont rappeller une semaine plus tard pour avoir mon numero de compte et j'étais rembourse sous 15 jours sans avoir a traverser une administration digne d'un autre age. La encore, des petits details dont on se souvient
Salon: léger avantage pour les Galleries a LHR par rapport au salon du 2E a Paris, car il y a plus de catering chaud. Mais pas vraiment significatif. En premiere, le salon de CDG est mieux que la Concorde Room. A Londres, tb salon d'AF toutefois au terminal 4, avec un catering meilleur qu'au 2E et que le salon Admirals qu'utilise BA a CDG.
Aeroports: je trouve le T5 et le T2E assez pratiques, meme si ca reste un cran en dessous du top asiatique. On passe plutot rapidement de l'entree a l'avion, des lors qu'on n'est pas au T5B/C ou S3 a CDG. Fast Track a Londres marche plutot mieux qu'Acces numero 1 qui peut etre implemente sans reelle efficacite
Siege: BA loin devant, le siege est top, tu te reposes reellement, a l'horizontal. En voyageant en couple, les deux sieges du milieu (qui sont tous les deux dans le sens inverse de la marche) au pont principal sont vraiment ideal (pas de separation et cloisons amovibles avec les sieges couloir). En solo, le pont superieur est le mieux, 64K le plus pratique. Pas de pre-reservation gratuite du siege sur BA en dessous du statut bronze enr evanche, un peu frustrant pour le premier voyage en business quand on n'a pas de statut
Programme de fidelite: un peu plus de miles avec Air France (175%) mais le bareme pour les depenser est beaucoup moins avantageux. Avec BA, combiné a la carte Amex BA cobrandée, tu as un voucher 2 for 1 tous les ans, ce qui te fait que tu peux prendre un billet prime pour 2 en ne payant les miles que pour un seul billet une fois par an. Donc LHR-JFK AR en premiere pour 120 000 miles a 2 (ou 80 000 en affaires), c'est incroyablement attractif par rapport a AF qui me demande 100 000 miles pour un AR en affaires pour une seule personne... les "taxes" sont prohibitives dans les 2 cas, les 2 compagnies incluant les surcharges carburant et facturent donc l'equivalent d'un AR en promo en eco sur tous les billets "gratuits" (sic!).
Equipage: variable sur les 2, meme si - c'est subjectif - l'amplitude est un peu plus grande chez AF (j'ai vraiment tout eu, du pire au plus chaleureux) et que j'ai l'impression que c'est un peu plus consistant sur BA (je n'ai jamais eu de souvenir vraiment extraordinaire, juste des gens qui font tb leur travail au mieux et jamais rien de grave/ choquant non plus)
Un detail important a mes yeux, quand tu es passager frequent et que tu as une resa en world traveler plus, en cas de surbooking operationnel, tu passes avant les employes qui voyagent pour raisons perso (GP) et tu as potentiellement le droit a un surclassement ce qui est toujours une bonne surprise. Ils proposent des surclassements payants sinon (comme AF en fonction de la dispo en LC), mais avec AF on te laisse les miles de ta classe d'origine alors que chez BA on t'attribue les miles de ta classe de voyage quand le surclassement a ete paye. tous ces petits details en disent long sur la philosophie des maisons respectives.
En cas de pepin operationnel, j'ai enormement apprecie le service client BA. Tant AF que BA sont tres reactifs avec l'email/ ROC pour te prevenir et rebooker sur les premiers vols dispo en cas d'annulation, mais pour un vol en affaires en Europe, AF m'envoie a l'Holiday Inn de l'aeroport pour attendre le lendemain, alors que BA m'offre le Mandarin Oriental Downtown, tranferts en taxi etc. Pour se faire rembourser, AF me demande (i) de passer au comptoir de l'aeroport, (ii) d'envoyer les originaux de factures/ repas par courrier a Beauvais, bref le monde de 1990... alors que BA me dit au telephone de tout payer moi meme, pas de detour par le comtoir aeroport et d'envoyer un scan par email. Ils m'ont rappeller une semaine plus tard pour avoir mon numero de compte et j'étais rembourse sous 15 jours sans avoir a traverser une administration digne d'un autre age. La encore, des petits details dont on se souvient
merci pour le gros complément d'infos ^^
Je dirai que tout dépend aussi de votre destination finale ...
Dans les 2 cas, les aéroports ne sont pas terribles, et faire une escale/transit est peu commode en comparaison d'autres aéroports européens ( comme Zurich, Munich ou Amsterdam ). Comme dans les 2 cas, le produit à bord est moyen ( catering médiocre chez BA, siège peu confortable sur AF surtout en B747, programme vidéo un peu short ... ), je choisirai en priorité le vol direct car dans 1 cas comme dans l'autre, ne vous attendez pas à une expérience de vols exceptionnelle 🤪
Dans les 2 cas, les aéroports ne sont pas terribles, et faire une escale/transit est peu commode en comparaison d'autres aéroports européens ( comme Zurich, Munich ou Amsterdam ). Comme dans les 2 cas, le produit à bord est moyen ( catering médiocre chez BA, siège peu confortable sur AF surtout en B747, programme vidéo un peu short ... ), je choisirai en priorité le vol direct car dans 1 cas comme dans l'autre, ne vous attendez pas à une expérience de vols exceptionnelle 🤪
Tyrolien
It's a beautifull day - don't let it get away -
Les 747 d'AF sont trop démodé par rapport à BA en raison de l'absence de vidéo individuelle en éco. De plus ce que j'aime chez BA c'est la configuration des 772 et 77W qui est de 3x3x3 en eco contre 3x4x3 chez AF.
C'est quand même intéressant de ce que vous avez mentionné mais sachez que quand vous voyagez avec BA en World Traveller plus sur un 772 ou un 77W, vous avez une configuration de 3x3x3 contre 3x4x3 chez AF. De plus avec BA l'année prochaine il y aura la possibilité de prendre l'Airbus a 380 et un Boeing 787 Dreamliner.
Même si BA est en train de refaire sa classe économique ils ne meteront pas une configuration de 3x4x3 sur ces 772 et 77W. De plus BA attend la livraison de 24 Boeings 787 Dreamliners et 12 Airbus a 380 pour l'année prochaine. Aussitôt que BA recevera son premier Boeing 787 Dreamliner et son premier Airbus a 380 ça va être la même classe économique que sur les autres avions. De plus les 744 de BA ne sont pas démodé comme chez AF ils ont tous des écrans individuels et BA depuis novembre dernier est entrain de modifier ses 744 en leur installant des écrans individuels Thales. AF avec ses 744 est à la traine par rapport à BA mais si tu vas voir CX avec 744 et qui est dans la même alliance avec BA, là tu voit qu'AF est trop dépassé par rapport à CX.
Je pense que vous n'avez pas transité par le T5 de BA à Londres : c'est très facile et pratique.
Ca batiment est neuf, clair, aéré et vraiment agréable.
Les connexions sont plutôt rapides
Je ne dirais pas non plus que le catering est médiocre : moyen, oui.
Vol direct réservé aux Parisiens, pas aux Lyonnais dont je fais partie ^^
Les connexions sont plutôt rapides
Je ne dirais pas non plus que le catering est médiocre : moyen, oui.
Vol direct réservé aux Parisiens, pas aux Lyonnais dont je fais partie ^^
Là où j'habite j'ai le choix entre BA et AF pour des vols transatlantique en partance de YUL. Mais BA à en provenance de YUL arrive au T5 mais ils ne faux pas oublier que certains vols de BA vont au terminal 3. Pour AF en provenance de YUL c'est le terminal 2E à CDG avec la possibilité de l'Airbus a 380. Mais YUL n'est pas vraiment une destination pour le 388 de BA je ne pense pas que les 388 de BA irront au Canada. Si oui ça serait YYZ et YVR qui pourrait bénéfecier du 388 de BA. De plus YUL est l'aéroport le plus proche de ma maison et il y a des chances que BA envoye un Boeing 787 Dreamliner sur YUL. Je peux aussi dire qu'AF a plus de poids sur YUL que BA mais sur l'Amérique du nord BA a plus de poids qu'AF.
Je pense que vous n'avez pas transité par le T5 de BA à Londres : c'est très facile et pratique.
Ca batiment est neuf, clair, aéré et vraiment agréable.
Si justement ... je ne critique pas l'esthetique du batiment qui est par contre très réussi ! Mais personnellement, j'ai connu des passages d'immigration très longuet, des temps d'attentes avant l'atterissage ou le débarquement assez long à cause du traffic sur la piste, et un suivi des bagages hésitants
Pour parler de ma ptite experience perso, j'ai fais un JFK-LHR-VIE, nous avons tourné au moins 20 minutes en rond au dessus de Londres pour cause de traffic , puis mis 20 bonnes minutes ( donc plus de 45 minutes de retard à l'arrivée ) à rejoindre le point de stationement de l'avion, et enfin j'ai perdu 30 minutes à l'immigration ... résultat j'ai raté mon vol sur VIE à 5 minutes près ( alors que j'avais 1h40 de transit, ce qui n'est pas ridicule )
Je n'ai jamais eu ce problème à Zurich ou à Munich par exemple ( plus petits aéroports ), voilà pourquoi je ne recommande pas spécialement LHR ( sauf pour un vol direct ), d'autant plus que le produit à bord de BA n'est pas inoubliable
Si justement ... je ne critique pas l'esthetique du batiment qui est par contre très réussi ! Mais personnellement, j'ai connu des passages d'immigration très longuet, des temps d'attentes avant l'atterissage ou le débarquement assez long à cause du traffic sur la piste, et un suivi des bagages hésitants
Pour parler de ma ptite experience perso, j'ai fais un JFK-LHR-VIE, nous avons tourné au moins 20 minutes en rond au dessus de Londres pour cause de traffic , puis mis 20 bonnes minutes ( donc plus de 45 minutes de retard à l'arrivée ) à rejoindre le point de stationement de l'avion, et enfin j'ai perdu 30 minutes à l'immigration ... résultat j'ai raté mon vol sur VIE à 5 minutes près ( alors que j'avais 1h40 de transit, ce qui n'est pas ridicule )
Je n'ai jamais eu ce problème à Zurich ou à Munich par exemple ( plus petits aéroports ), voilà pourquoi je ne recommande pas spécialement LHR ( sauf pour un vol direct ), d'autant plus que le produit à bord de BA n'est pas inoubliable
Tyrolien
It's a beautifull day - don't let it get away -
Zurich et Munich sont des plus petits aéroports faisant partie des 10 meilleurs au monde selon le www.worldairportawards.com. Tandis que LHR et CDG sont parmi les pires aéroports de la planète. Je tiens aussi a vous dire que l'aéroport le plus proche de chez moi est YUL et de là il y a des vols directs vers CDG, LHR, MUC et aussi ZRH et etc. Mais avez vu les vidéos de comparaison d'Air France vs British Airways?
@ Tyrolien
LHR est tellement gros que ça peut arriver ^^
sinon Pour BA, il n'y a qu'un vol au T3, c'est le Londres - Singapour - Sydney
Pour le LHR - YUL, il s'agit d'un Boeing 777-200/300 et la configuration est en 3x3x3 actuellement.
LHR est tellement gros que ça peut arriver ^^
sinon Pour BA, il n'y a qu'un vol au T3, c'est le Londres - Singapour - Sydney
Pour le LHR - YUL, il s'agit d'un Boeing 777-200/300 et la configuration est en 3x3x3 actuellement.
Pour LHR T3 il y a aussi le vol 9 de BA qui fait LHR-BKK-SYD mais entre SIN et LHR il y a un vol de BA qui part du terminal 3 et qui finit à SIN. Sur YUL BA utilise présentement un Boeing 767 et après ça sera un Boeing 777. Je trouve que BA est supérieur à AF au niveau de la configuration à bord de ses appareils ils ne mettent pas de sieges trop étroits comme c'est le cas sur des 777 de AF. Mais aussi les 747 de BA ont moins de sieges que ceux d'AF et aussi j'aimerais savoir combien de sieges auront les 787 de BA et aussi les Airbus a 380 de BA. Je suis sur que ça sera inférieur à AF.
Log in first, then come back to this page.
You might also like
More discussions
Bonjour,
Je pense partir bientôt pour la Malaisie
J'ai vu des prix interessant et vol direct de Paris avec Malaysia Airlines
Est ce une compagnie fiable?
Merci pour vos retours
J'effectue régulièrement des voyages depuis plus de vingt ans
maís c'est la première fois qu'un compagnies me traite si mal que Air France.
Deux voyages, deux fois des problèmes. Le dernier:
Voyage de Séoul à Rennes. Dernière partie de París CDG à Rennes par Air France.
J'arrive à Paris et je me rends directement chez Air France pour obtenir la carte d'embarquement jusqu'à Rennes. On n'y assure que mon bagage suit jusqu'à Rennes.
Arrivé à Rennes, pas de bagage, comme c'est le cas de 5 personnes.
Le bureau d'Air France est fermé et le oersonnel de l'aéroport m'assure qu''il y a rarement quelqu'un.
Avec l'aide du personnel de l'aéroport, je fais une réclamation par internet et Mon bagage est quadi directement localisé, en conséquence je l'aurai le lendemain.
4 jours plus tard, le bagage est toujours au même endroitvà CDG, rien ne bouge.
Le problème est qu'Air France m'a pas de service clientèle. Ce qu'ils appellent service clientes, c'est un service qui répond après une heure et qui vous répète ce qu''il y a sur le FORMULAIRE informatique. Aucune coordination, aucune moyen de faire bouger les choses, je suppose que Air France préfère me payer l'indemnisation après 21 jours que se bouger le cul.
J'ai déjà eu des bagages égarés dans d'autres voyages maís c'est la première fois que je vous un tel je-m'en-foutisme foutisme et manque de professionalisme..
maís c'est la première fois qu'un compagnies me traite si mal que Air France.
Deux voyages, deux fois des problèmes. Le dernier:
Voyage de Séoul à Rennes. Dernière partie de París CDG à Rennes par Air France.
J'arrive à Paris et je me rends directement chez Air France pour obtenir la carte d'embarquement jusqu'à Rennes. On n'y assure que mon bagage suit jusqu'à Rennes.
Arrivé à Rennes, pas de bagage, comme c'est le cas de 5 personnes.
Le bureau d'Air France est fermé et le oersonnel de l'aéroport m'assure qu''il y a rarement quelqu'un.
Avec l'aide du personnel de l'aéroport, je fais une réclamation par internet et Mon bagage est quadi directement localisé, en conséquence je l'aurai le lendemain.
4 jours plus tard, le bagage est toujours au même endroitvà CDG, rien ne bouge.
Le problème est qu'Air France m'a pas de service clientèle. Ce qu'ils appellent service clientes, c'est un service qui répond après une heure et qui vous répète ce qu''il y a sur le FORMULAIRE informatique. Aucune coordination, aucune moyen de faire bouger les choses, je suppose que Air France préfère me payer l'indemnisation après 21 jours que se bouger le cul.
J'ai déjà eu des bagages égarés dans d'autres voyages maís c'est la première fois que je vous un tel je-m'en-foutisme foutisme et manque de professionalisme..
Hi there,
We had planned a trip to Sicily in August, and due to the volcanic eruption of Mount Etna, my flight was canceled. The airline is refunding the outbound flight, but none of the non-refundable expenses: accommodation booked through Booking, rental car, and the return flight aren’t covered. My SUPER Gold card doesn’t work in this specific case! :( If anyone has been in this situation, could you let me know if you were able to get any recourse and, if so, how?
Thanks in advance
Hello,
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August. My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August. My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi,
I booked an Etihad ticket on their website for Dusseldorf-Abu Dhabi. In the first name field, I entered all my first names (something I never do and I regret it, but the site was confusing). Everything is spelled correctly, but the problem is that I just received my new passport and only my first two first names and the first letter of the third appear—there’s no trace of the last one.
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in. Thanks for your feedback!
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in. Thanks for your feedback!
Hi everyone,
Next January, I’m heading to India.
My outbound flight is with Emirates from Paris to Dubai, then another Emirates flight from Dubai to Calcutta.
Could anyone tell me how the connection works? I’ve heard there’s a dedicated Emirates zone, but how does it actually work in practice—I’ve got a 2-hour layover.
Thanks so much!
Take care.
Hi there,
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon. I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport. Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…). AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly. On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double! In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others? Given the price difference, I’m hesitant… Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go? Thanks, HERVE
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon. I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport. Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…). AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly. On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double! In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others? Given the price difference, I’m hesitant… Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go? Thanks, HERVE
Hi everyone, I’ve unfortunately only just noticed that I booked two flight tickets, but I made a mistake on the second first name. Basically, my computer auto-filled and typed my first name twice, so both tickets are in my first name. Only the last names—mine and my friend’s—are correct.
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common). I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common). I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
Hello,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Hi there,
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
Hi,
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
Hi there,
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
Hi,
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
Hi,
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
Hello,
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
Hello,
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Hi everyone,
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
Hi there!
Has anyone taken the direct flight from CDG to Las Vegas with Air France?
Looking forward to your feedback!
Hey everyone,
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
Hi there,
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric
Hi there,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
Hi there,
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry







