Santé financière de la compagnie aérienne Norwegian
by Mardidi
This discussion is in French, the community’s main language.
Original post
Bonjour, j'hésite à prendre un billet avec la Norwegian pour octobre.
Avez vous des infos sur leur santé financière ?
Merci
Réponse très intéressante
Mais elle est super ma réponse .
Pour Norwegian tout va bien , les résultats sont en ligne et pour d'autre c'est la future compagnie qui va mourir .
Pour être sérieux personne ne pourra vous dire le devenir de Norwegian , mais ce qui est sûr c'est un manque de trésorerie dans un futur plus ou moins proche. La non utilisation de ses 737 MAX lui fait aussi du tort .
Pour être sérieux personne ne pourra vous dire le devenir de Norwegian , mais ce qui est sûr c'est un manque de trésorerie dans un futur plus ou moins proche. La non utilisation de ses 737 MAX lui fait aussi du tort .
Budgetair permet de souscrire une assurance contre la faillite de la compagnie aérienne dont voici les conditions générales.
Au cours des dernières années, de nombreuses compagnies aériennes ont connu des difficultés financières. Wow Air, Germania ou encore Air Berlin en font notamment partie. Ce service vous permet d'évitez la perte de votre argent lorsque la compagnie aérienne annule votre vol en raison de sa faillite. Nous vous rembourserons les coûts jusqu'à 2 000 £ par billet (ou l'équivalent dans votre monnaie locale).
On peut choisir l'option (entre 12 et 16 euros pour l'A/R) pour KLM, United, etc. mais pas pour Norwegian... Étonnant non ?
Au cours des dernières années, de nombreuses compagnies aériennes ont connu des difficultés financières. Wow Air, Germania ou encore Air Berlin en font notamment partie. Ce service vous permet d'évitez la perte de votre argent lorsque la compagnie aérienne annule votre vol en raison de sa faillite. Nous vous rembourserons les coûts jusqu'à 2 000 £ par billet (ou l'équivalent dans votre monnaie locale).
On peut choisir l'option (entre 12 et 16 euros pour l'A/R) pour KLM, United, etc. mais pas pour Norwegian... Étonnant non ?
Réponse très intéressante
Et question "n'importe quoi" t'es pas sur tweeter t'as droit a + de 144 signes c'est sur quel vol c'est quand ...
un vol dans quelques jours risque quai nul, un vol en 2020 ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Et question "n'importe quoi" t'es pas sur tweeter t'as droit a + de 144 signes c'est sur quel vol c'est quand ...
un vol dans quelques jours risque quai nul, un vol en 2020 ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
A priori, c'est ecrit ''en octobre '' !
Et question amabilité, on peut mieux faire, non?
Certes, je pourrais mais c'est tellement plus agréable d'avoir des renseignements précis par des forumeurs spécialistes de l'aérien.
Cher Didier,
Norwegian - à consommer avec grande modération!
à plus Chris
Norwegian - à consommer avec grande modération!
à plus Chris
Hello, je me suis posé la même question, pour un vol sur LAX en octobre....la compagnie devrait quand même rentrer un peu de cash pendant la saison d'été, en octobre ils devraient voler encore.....mais j'attends un peu....
La compagnie aérienne a une santé financière réputée fragile.
Le prochain gros risque sera la fin d été et l automne prochain. En effet, actuellement la compagnie aérienne a encaisse les reservations, a donc de la trésorerie, mais devra sortir cet argent pour la haute saison et la fin d été pourrait être delicate, comme c est souvent le cas pour les compagnies aériennes.
La compagnie a réussi a sauver sa trésorerie. Récemment elle l a faite en vendant une grosse partie de sa flotte, dont des avions en commande, pour les relouer ensuite. Ca vous fait de l argent d un coup mais il faudra ensuite sortir tous les mois plus d argent.
Deux compagnies aériennes transatlantiques ont fait récemment faillite, avec le meme modele que Norwegian, a savoir des vols pas chers: Primera Air et Wow Air.
Donc la question est: le retrait de ces compétiteurs a t il été salutaire pour Norwegian ou pas assez?
Ce qui se dit également c est que malgré les taux de remplissages tres élevés, le prix moyen du ticket est trop faible pour entrer dans les couts. D autant que contrairement aux autres opérateurs, surtout en transatlantique, la compagnie n a pas de classe avant sur laquelle elle peut refaire ses marges et probablement aussi beaucoup moins de vols cargos.
Cote positif, il faut se dire que Norwegian a un actionnaire solide, la Norvège, qui pour l instant a recapitalise a plusieurs reprises la compagnie.
Autre aspect plus sensible: la compagnie intéresserait Lufthansa et le groupe IAG (British Airways) pour developper ce segment et des negotiations d achat ont eu lieu mais ont échouées. Alors peut être un acheteur se manifestera lorsque la compagnie sera en tres mauvais état... ou alors il sera plus interessant de jouer les vautours pour prendre la place et récupérer les actifs...
Rajoutez a cela que vu la situation geopolitique actuelle qui tire vers le haut le prix des carburants et augmente les couts d exploitation des compagnie... et risque de faire encore plus mal aux plus fragiles.
Alors a vous de savoir si vous prenez le risque ou pas: - l année dernière vous auriez pris ce pari pour Primera Air, vous auriez perdu; - vous auriez fait le pari pour Wow Air vous auriez gagne... mais perdu quelques mois plus tard; - et vous auriez gagne pour Norwegian.
Le prochain gros risque sera la fin d été et l automne prochain. En effet, actuellement la compagnie aérienne a encaisse les reservations, a donc de la trésorerie, mais devra sortir cet argent pour la haute saison et la fin d été pourrait être delicate, comme c est souvent le cas pour les compagnies aériennes.
La compagnie a réussi a sauver sa trésorerie. Récemment elle l a faite en vendant une grosse partie de sa flotte, dont des avions en commande, pour les relouer ensuite. Ca vous fait de l argent d un coup mais il faudra ensuite sortir tous les mois plus d argent.
Deux compagnies aériennes transatlantiques ont fait récemment faillite, avec le meme modele que Norwegian, a savoir des vols pas chers: Primera Air et Wow Air.
Donc la question est: le retrait de ces compétiteurs a t il été salutaire pour Norwegian ou pas assez?
Ce qui se dit également c est que malgré les taux de remplissages tres élevés, le prix moyen du ticket est trop faible pour entrer dans les couts. D autant que contrairement aux autres opérateurs, surtout en transatlantique, la compagnie n a pas de classe avant sur laquelle elle peut refaire ses marges et probablement aussi beaucoup moins de vols cargos.
Cote positif, il faut se dire que Norwegian a un actionnaire solide, la Norvège, qui pour l instant a recapitalise a plusieurs reprises la compagnie.
Autre aspect plus sensible: la compagnie intéresserait Lufthansa et le groupe IAG (British Airways) pour developper ce segment et des negotiations d achat ont eu lieu mais ont échouées. Alors peut être un acheteur se manifestera lorsque la compagnie sera en tres mauvais état... ou alors il sera plus interessant de jouer les vautours pour prendre la place et récupérer les actifs...
Rajoutez a cela que vu la situation geopolitique actuelle qui tire vers le haut le prix des carburants et augmente les couts d exploitation des compagnie... et risque de faire encore plus mal aux plus fragiles.
Alors a vous de savoir si vous prenez le risque ou pas: - l année dernière vous auriez pris ce pari pour Primera Air, vous auriez perdu; - vous auriez fait le pari pour Wow Air vous auriez gagne... mais perdu quelques mois plus tard; - et vous auriez gagne pour Norwegian.
Hello, je me suis posé la même question, pour un vol sur LAX en octobre....la compagnie devrait quand même rentrer un peu de cash pendant la saison d'été, en octobre ils devraient voler encore.....mais j'attends un peu....
Sur les USA le risque et double 1 que la cie mette la clé sous la porte mais la ??? 2 que la Cie soit reprise par xyz et que le repreneur laisse tomber certaines lignes pas du tout rentables vers les USA! Donc Norwegian c'est plein de ????? au delà du court terme
Sur les USA le risque et double 1 que la cie mette la clé sous la porte mais la ??? 2 que la Cie soit reprise par xyz et que le repreneur laisse tomber certaines lignes pas du tout rentables vers les USA! Donc Norwegian c'est plein de ????? au delà du court terme
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Norwegian va arrêter au 15 septembre toutes ses lignes au départ de l'Irlande vers USA / Canada, une décision motivée par le pbl sur les B737MAX mais la vraie raison ? si ces lignes faisaient des revenus confortables en $$$ la Cie aurait certainement trouvé de quoi les faire
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Je me permets de donner une source irlandaise sur cette information
Rte Irlande Arret des vols Transatlantiques Ryanair
Le calendrier est inquiétant: - l arrêt est brutal. En general c est en fin de programme, c’est a dire que l’on ne va pas reconduire les vols pour l’hiver; - la fin d’été est une période delicate. D’ailleurs Air Berlin avait declare sa faillite a cette période, meme si les vols avaient continue quelques temps avec une perfusion du gouvernement allemand pour éviter un chaos; - il me semble que ce fut la meme chose pour Monarch et d'autres - la raison est qu’a la basse saison les compagnies encaissent des reservations; - ce cash va ensuite être dépense pendant la haute saison; - les reservations pour la saison hiver sont plus faibles; - donc consequence moins de cash en fin de tres haute saison.
Rte Irlande Arret des vols Transatlantiques Ryanair
Le calendrier est inquiétant: - l arrêt est brutal. En general c est en fin de programme, c’est a dire que l’on ne va pas reconduire les vols pour l’hiver; - la fin d’été est une période delicate. D’ailleurs Air Berlin avait declare sa faillite a cette période, meme si les vols avaient continue quelques temps avec une perfusion du gouvernement allemand pour éviter un chaos; - il me semble que ce fut la meme chose pour Monarch et d'autres - la raison est qu’a la basse saison les compagnies encaissent des reservations; - ce cash va ensuite être dépense pendant la haute saison; - les reservations pour la saison hiver sont plus faibles; - donc consequence moins de cash en fin de tres haute saison.
Le soucis est que de la location d’avions moyen courrier ETOPS ne doit pas être facile a trouver.
Mais le 15 septembre est assez tôt pour la fin de la saison tout de même...
si les lignes Irlande >>> faisant des revenus "intéressants" il n'y aurait surement pas de gros pbl a trouver des machines, passée la période de haute saison Et je pense qu'iol y aura d'autres annonces du mm genre pour d'autres routes peut être pas en sept mais sur oct ...par ex des suppressions de vols vers Paris en mettant les pax sur d'autres routes vis hubs scandinaves ( du déjà vu je crois)
si les lignes Irlande >>> faisant des revenus "intéressants" il n'y aurait surement pas de gros pbl a trouver des machines, passée la période de haute saison Et je pense qu'iol y aura d'autres annonces du mm genre pour d'autres routes peut être pas en sept mais sur oct ...par ex des suppressions de vols vers Paris en mettant les pax sur d'autres routes vis hubs scandinaves ( du déjà vu je crois)
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Sauf que d’Irlande les vols sont principalement opérés par des Boeing 737.
Il serait probablement facile en effet de trouver des appareils long courrier pour ces liaisons. D’ailleurs un A330 de la compagnie espagnole Evelop est d’ailleurs louée actuellement. Ces avions seront trop gros pour la basse saison.
Alors a qui louer des avions? Smartlynx, Orange2fly? Il y aura bien sur des A320 disponibles. Mais ces avions, équipages et compagnies seront elles habilitées ETOPS, nécessaire pour traverser l’Atlantique?
Ce qui limite cependant ces questions de capacités est la date de l’interruption, très tôt en moyenne saison, et son préavis, à peine un mois.
Il serait probablement facile en effet de trouver des appareils long courrier pour ces liaisons. D’ailleurs un A330 de la compagnie espagnole Evelop est d’ailleurs louée actuellement. Ces avions seront trop gros pour la basse saison.
Alors a qui louer des avions? Smartlynx, Orange2fly? Il y aura bien sur des A320 disponibles. Mais ces avions, équipages et compagnies seront elles habilitées ETOPS, nécessaire pour traverser l’Atlantique?
Ce qui limite cependant ces questions de capacités est la date de l’interruption, très tôt en moyenne saison, et son préavis, à peine un mois.
Un article de CNN sur l’avenir de Norwegian qui va devoir prendre d’importantes décisions pour continuer son activité.
La mauvaise santé de la compagnie n’est pas une surprise et pour l’instant elle continue son activité.
Des mesures d’économies sont régulièrement prises, la dernière est la fermeture assez brutale des lignes transatlantiques depuis l’Irlande au 15 septembre (avant la fin de la saison été, une date assez inhabituelle).
Le PDG historique souhaite partir en retraite il semblerait qu’un remplaçant ne lui ait pas été trouvé.
A voir les événements à suivre.
Si la compagnie n’a pas un fort trafic moyen courrier en France, son activité long courrier est présente à Roissy avec 3 avions Boeing 787 Dreamliners basés.
Norwegian restructuration de la dette. CNN (en anglais)
La mauvaise santé de la compagnie n’est pas une surprise et pour l’instant elle continue son activité.
Des mesures d’économies sont régulièrement prises, la dernière est la fermeture assez brutale des lignes transatlantiques depuis l’Irlande au 15 septembre (avant la fin de la saison été, une date assez inhabituelle).
Le PDG historique souhaite partir en retraite il semblerait qu’un remplaçant ne lui ait pas été trouvé.
A voir les événements à suivre.
Si la compagnie n’a pas un fort trafic moyen courrier en France, son activité long courrier est présente à Roissy avec 3 avions Boeing 787 Dreamliners basés.
Norwegian restructuration de la dette. CNN (en anglais)
La compagnie cherche à retarder le remboursement de sa dette et fait en ce moment de la pub à la tv.
https://www.air-journal.fr/2019-09-03-norwegian-cherche-a-retarder-le-remboursement-de-sa-dette-5214765.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+AirJournal+%28Air+Journal+-+Tout+sur+le+transport+a%C3%A9rien%29
https://www.air-journal.fr/2019-09-03-norwegian-cherche-a-retarder-le-remboursement-de-sa-dette-5214765.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+AirJournal+%28Air+Journal+-+Tout+sur+le+transport+a%C3%A9rien%29
"Si partir vivre ses rêves remplit l'âme, les partager après les avoir réalisés la grandit"
"Qui veut apprendre à se connaître commence par explorer le monde"
Norwegian n'a obtenu de ses créanciers qu'un délai d’un an supplémentaire pour les rembourser, alors qu'elle avait demandé un délai de 24 mois supplémentaires pour rembourser sa dette
Ok c'est un bol d'air pour 1an ... ou mieux se vendre mais après ... le modèle low cost en long courrier semble ne pas fonctionner
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Vive la finance...
Quand vous n’arrivez pas à rembourser vos dettes, parce que votre activité vous fait perdre de l’argent, on vous donne un délai mais on augmente la somme à rembourser...
Ils avaient un deuxième credit qui arrive à terme l’année prochaine également me semble t il...
Reculer pour mieux sauter? Mais cela fait plusieurs années que cela dure...
Ils avaient un deuxième credit qui arrive à terme l’année prochaine également me semble t il...
Reculer pour mieux sauter? Mais cela fait plusieurs années que cela dure...
Comme quoi le délai pour rembourser la dette ne va pas régler tous les problèmes.
"Si partir vivre ses rêves remplit l'âme, les partager après les avoir réalisés la grandit"
"Qui veut apprendre à se connaître commence par explorer le monde"
Comme quoi le délai pour rembourser la dette ne va pas régler tous les problèmes.
Si tout de mm car toutes ces suppressions de lignes vont générées des économies et parfois importantes lorsque la Cie doit par exemple affreter des machines !
Si tout de mm car toutes ces suppressions de lignes vont générées des économies et parfois importantes lorsque la Cie doit par exemple affreter des machines !
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Norwegian annonce l'ouverture d'un CDG / Austin et un trimestre record.
A suivre...
https://www.air-journal.fr/2019-10-24-norwegian-un-paris-austin-et-un-trimestre-record-5215803.html
A suivre...
https://www.air-journal.fr/2019-10-24-norwegian-un-paris-austin-et-un-trimestre-record-5215803.html
"Si partir vivre ses rêves remplit l'âme, les partager après les avoir réalisés la grandit"
"Qui veut apprendre à se connaître commence par explorer le monde"
Un nouvel avion de prévu sur Roissy pour ces augmentations de fréquences ?
Ou alors besoin de cash et donc augmentation des vols pour l'été, faudra finir la saison après...
Toujours de la méfiance envers cette compagnie sur le long terme.
Faut bien habiller la mariée pour le prochain mariage 🙂 Je pense plus depuis un bon moment d'un rachat de toute ou partie de la Cie donc oui faut faire un joli réseau, si possible de $$$ en caisse ... a suivre
Faut bien habiller la mariée pour le prochain mariage 🙂 Je pense plus depuis un bon moment d'un rachat de toute ou partie de la Cie donc oui faut faire un joli réseau, si possible de $$$ en caisse ... a suivre
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
https://www.aviation24.be/airlines/norwegian-air-shuttle/reports-its-best-ever-quarterly-result-with-a-profit-before-tax-of-nok-2-2-billion/
Norwegian reports its best ever quarterly result with a profit before tax of NOK 2.2 billion
Norwegian’s third quarter results are characterised by improved profitability, higher unit revenue, lower unit cost and reduced growth, in line with the strategy. Profit before tax improved by 38 percent to NOK 2.2 billion compared to the same quarter last year.
Norwegian reports its best ever quarterly result with a profit before tax of NOK 2.2 billion
Norwegian’s third quarter results are characterised by improved profitability, higher unit revenue, lower unit cost and reduced growth, in line with the strategy. Profit before tax improved by 38 percent to NOK 2.2 billion compared to the same quarter last year.
Cher Michel,
Je trouve le communiqué de Norwegian Air (en anglais) est très bizarre, car on peut lire: "Une profitabilité accrue et un profit avant impôt amélioré de 38% s'élevant à 2.2. millions de couronnes norvégiennes, comparé au même trimestre de l'année passée. Et tout ça avec un facteur de charge (load factor) de 91.2 %..." Donc, que des bonnes nouvelles!
MAIS (plus tard)
"La priorité principale de Norwegian est un retour à la profitabilité par une série de mesures...…" Bon, je dois admettre que je ne suis pas un expert/comptable, mais comment voir ces deux informations (qui semblent se contredire méchamment)? Comment peut-on être profitable pendant ce trimestre si on suit (en même temps) la stratégie pour atteindre la profitabilité (donc pas encore atteinte)? (à moins qu'on est profitable maintenant, mais on doit éponger une dette énorme accumulée plus tôt.... Franchement, je n'y comprends rien à ce communiqué!)
Et ils finissent tout en disant: "Les résultats de Norwegian Air dans le troisième trimestre démontrent que nous respectons notre stratégie en avançant de la croissance vers une profitabilité" Bon, je ne suis (toujours) pas rassuré... Chris
Je trouve le communiqué de Norwegian Air (en anglais) est très bizarre, car on peut lire: "Une profitabilité accrue et un profit avant impôt amélioré de 38% s'élevant à 2.2. millions de couronnes norvégiennes, comparé au même trimestre de l'année passée. Et tout ça avec un facteur de charge (load factor) de 91.2 %..." Donc, que des bonnes nouvelles!
MAIS (plus tard)
"La priorité principale de Norwegian est un retour à la profitabilité par une série de mesures...…" Bon, je dois admettre que je ne suis pas un expert/comptable, mais comment voir ces deux informations (qui semblent se contredire méchamment)? Comment peut-on être profitable pendant ce trimestre si on suit (en même temps) la stratégie pour atteindre la profitabilité (donc pas encore atteinte)? (à moins qu'on est profitable maintenant, mais on doit éponger une dette énorme accumulée plus tôt.... Franchement, je n'y comprends rien à ce communiqué!)
Et ils finissent tout en disant: "Les résultats de Norwegian Air dans le troisième trimestre démontrent que nous respectons notre stratégie en avançant de la croissance vers une profitabilité" Bon, je ne suis (toujours) pas rassuré... Chris
Et ils finissent tout en disant: "Les résultats de Norwegian Air dans le troisième trimestre démontrent que nous respectons notre stratégie en avançant de la croissance vers une profitabilité"
“Norwegian’s third quarter results show that we are delivering on our strategy of moving from growth to profitability.
Je traduirais plutôt : Les résultats du troisième trimestre montrent que notre changement de stratégie a été payant - en donnant la priorité à la profitabilité plutôt qu'à la croissance.
“Norwegian’s third quarter results show that we are delivering on our strategy of moving from growth to profitability.
Je traduirais plutôt : Les résultats du troisième trimestre montrent que notre changement de stratégie a été payant - en donnant la priorité à la profitabilité plutôt qu'à la croissance.
Cher Michel,
Fort intéressant votre traduction :-)
Chris
Fort intéressant votre traduction :-)
Chris
Bon octobre est passé...et Norwegian est toujours là. Mais je pense tout de même que de gros nuages s'amoncellent et Michael O'Leary CEO de Ryanair pense comme moi...ou disons que je pense comme lui.
https://www.lalibre.be/economie/entreprises-startup/michael-o-leary-patron-de-ryanair-norwegian-est-condamnee-5dc00bb2d8ad58388747e5b3
Bon cela peut faire un appel d'air pour des lignes européennes de FR...mais pas pour le long courrier ! De fait, j'éviterais pour en revenir au post initial !
https://www.lalibre.be/economie/entreprises-startup/michael-o-leary-patron-de-ryanair-norwegian-est-condamnee-5dc00bb2d8ad58388747e5b3
Bon cela peut faire un appel d'air pour des lignes européennes de FR...mais pas pour le long courrier ! De fait, j'éviterais pour en revenir au post initial !
Norwegian était une très bonne Cie sur ses marchés historiques qui aurait surement fait bcp de mal a ryanair +++ mais elle s'est grillée en mettant le pied sur le long courrier ou elle a été de galère en galère ( B787 puis B737MAX) plus un peu de n'importe quoi dans certains des lancements
Donc ....
Il faut que la Cie arrête et cède son secteur long courrier et revienne a ses fondamentaux. visiblement le fondateur/boss de Norwegian y était opposé , il a ou va quitter ses fonctions donc les choses pourraient changer assez vite !
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Norwegian vient de signer un accord avec JetBlue, qui reve de se lancer en transatlantique.
Je doute qu il soit facile d’etre performant sur ce marche sans avoir des correspondances des deux cotes.
Norwegian en a maintenant cote US... possiblement ils devraient se concentrer la ou ils ont des bases cote europe.
Mais ensuite encore faudra t il reussir a faire monter les prix des billets a des niveaux tenables.
A voir la suite...
Je doute qu il soit facile d’etre performant sur ce marche sans avoir des correspondances des deux cotes.
Norwegian en a maintenant cote US... possiblement ils devraient se concentrer la ou ils ont des bases cote europe.
Mais ensuite encore faudra t il reussir a faire monter les prix des billets a des niveaux tenables.
A voir la suite...
Nouvelle ouverture de ligne;
https://www.air-journal.fr/2019-11-13-norwegian-reliera-paris-a-chicago-lete-prochain-5216210.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+AirJournal+%28Air+Journal+-+Tout+sur+le+transport+a%C3%A9rien%29
On verra bien où tout cela mènera........
https://www.air-journal.fr/2019-11-13-norwegian-reliera-paris-a-chicago-lete-prochain-5216210.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+AirJournal+%28Air+Journal+-+Tout+sur+le+transport+a%C3%A9rien%29
On verra bien où tout cela mènera........
"Si partir vivre ses rêves remplit l'âme, les partager après les avoir réalisés la grandit"
"Qui veut apprendre à se connaître commence par explorer le monde"
Et ça continue
Norwegain arrête tout son trafic long courrier au départ de Copenhague et Stockholm, plus quelques réductions au départ d'Oslo
Même si on est pas directement concerné en France c'est loin d'être bon pour la Cie .... a part ça tout va bien
Même si on est pas directement concerné en France c'est loin d'être bon pour la Cie .... a part ça tout va bien
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Comme tu dis "à part ça tout va bien"
https://www.air-journal.fr/2019-11-29-norwegian-la-filiale-argentine-menacee-5216550.html
https://www.air-journal.fr/2019-11-29-norwegian-la-filiale-argentine-menacee-5216550.html
"Si partir vivre ses rêves remplit l'âme, les partager après les avoir réalisés la grandit"
"Qui veut apprendre à se connaître commence par explorer le monde"
Tout continue très bien pour Norwegian.
Il y a quelques temps KLM a du donner un de ses vols Amsterdam <> New York à Norwegian (compagnie non UE bénéficiant d'un actionnariat public y compris de récents refinancements) sur ordre de l'UE.
Malgré ce "cadeau clé en main" et le dumping social/fiscal en oeuvre, la compagnie norvégienne n'est plus capable d'opérer le vol quotidien et doit réduire la fréquence sur cette ligne.
https://www.routesonline.com/news/38/airlineroute/288531/norwegian-1q20-amsterdam-new-york-frequency-changes/
Ca donne confiance pour l'avenir...
Il y a quelques temps KLM a du donner un de ses vols Amsterdam <> New York à Norwegian (compagnie non UE bénéficiant d'un actionnariat public y compris de récents refinancements) sur ordre de l'UE.
Malgré ce "cadeau clé en main" et le dumping social/fiscal en oeuvre, la compagnie norvégienne n'est plus capable d'opérer le vol quotidien et doit réduire la fréquence sur cette ligne.
https://www.routesonline.com/news/38/airlineroute/288531/norwegian-1q20-amsterdam-new-york-frequency-changes/
Ca donne confiance pour l'avenir...
Exact l'Etat n'est pas actionnaire dans le Cie , c'est lun fond "souverain" norvegien qui l'est et ce denier est en partie controlé par l'Etat
Ce n'est pas tt a fait la mm chose car une Cie "étatisée" c'est une ligne dans un budget, la le fond est un actionnaire comme un autre qui peut remettre des $$$ dans le capital, ce qui a été fait, jeter l'éponge ou ce qui est le plus probable vendre toute ou partie des actifs de la Cie et c'est peut être pour se faire que Norwegian essaye de se donner une meilleure "figure" en assainissant ses comptes
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Pas vraiment un scoop toutes les compagnies aériennes souffrent en ce moment mais certaines auront sûrement plus de mal que d'autres pour traverser la crise covid19.
https://www.air-journal.fr/2020-03-11-coronavirus-norwegian-souffre-5218789.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook
https://www.air-journal.fr/2020-03-11-coronavirus-norwegian-souffre-5218789.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook
"Si partir vivre ses rêves remplit l'âme, les partager après les avoir réalisés la grandit"
"Qui veut apprendre à se connaître commence par explorer le monde"
Nous y sommes sans doute pour DY. Banqueroute pour DY Suède et DY Danemark , fin du contrat avec la firme OSM Aviation et fermeture des bases en Espagne, Grande-Bretagne, Finlande, Suède et USA.
Sera-ce suffisant pour sauver DY Norway et les bases dee France et d'Italie ?
Triste fin...
Log in first, then come back to this page.
You might also like
Densha Otaku - Lesser-Known Regions
Two weeks under the Puglia sun
Return to Swedish Lapland: Trek on the Kungsleden and Crossing the Sarek
Off on a winter adventure in the American West!
3 weeks in Laos, stress-free
Draw Me Your Japan...
South Africa in safari mode: February/March 2026
Back in Tunisia (live account)
More discussions
Hello,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi there,
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
Hi,
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
Hi there,
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
Hi,
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
Hi,
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
Hello,
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
Hello,
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Hi everyone,
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
Hi there!
Has anyone taken the direct flight from CDG to Las Vegas with Air France?
Looking forward to your feedback!
Hey everyone,
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
Hi there,
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric
Hi there,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
Hi there,
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry
Hi there,
I have a question...
Has anyone managed to get a refund from Oman Air?
After a delayed flight, we missed our connecting flight to get home!! At midnight, the flight attendant booked us on a flight to Nice via Munich, even though we were in Munich and wanted to get back to Nice... Too tired from the trip, we didn’t notice the mistake!! The next day, of course, the booking wasn’t valid!! We had to pay again for the flight back to Nice... I’m really struggling!! I think they’re giving me the runaround!! I’ve sent several emails, tried Messenger and WhatsApp, but the only responses I get are: "We need to investigate!! We’ll get back to you in 15 days!!" It’s been over a month!!
I just sent a registered letter (LRAR) to their office at Paris Charles de Gaulle, which is still open!!
Do you have any other suggestions for me?
Thanks in advance for your help! Virginie
After a delayed flight, we missed our connecting flight to get home!! At midnight, the flight attendant booked us on a flight to Nice via Munich, even though we were in Munich and wanted to get back to Nice... Too tired from the trip, we didn’t notice the mistake!! The next day, of course, the booking wasn’t valid!! We had to pay again for the flight back to Nice... I’m really struggling!! I think they’re giving me the runaround!! I’ve sent several emails, tried Messenger and WhatsApp, but the only responses I get are: "We need to investigate!! We’ll get back to you in 15 days!!" It’s been over a month!!
I just sent a registered letter (LRAR) to their office at Paris Charles de Gaulle, which is still open!!
Do you have any other suggestions for me?
Thanks in advance for your help! Virginie
Hi!
Sri Lanka has announced it could run out of fuel in the coming weeks if the Strait of Hormuz remains blocked. The government has implemented a mandatory four-day workweek to save oil, and there are long lines at gas stations due to fears of an early shortage.
In Vietnam, the government has warned all airlines that flights will need to be reduced due to a lack of kerosene. The country imports two-thirds of its jet fuel from China and Thailand, but both countries have now banned exports out of fear of domestic shortages.
The state is asking airlines to plan ahead and park aircraft to drastically reduce operations, starting with domestic flights and then international ones. International carriers will also need to cut back on their rotations.
This will begin in the coming days. 🙁
Hi there,
I’ve got a long layover (about 10 hours) in Seoul on an upcoming trip.
I arrive from Phnom Penh at 7:20 AM and depart for Montreal at 6:00 PM.
First question: Will my checked baggage be transferred automatically? I have a single ticket from KTI to YUL (Air Canada ticket—KTI-ICN operated by Asiana (codeshare) and ICN-YUL by Air Canada).
Second question: I saw it’s possible to join free guided tours (Airport Transit Tour). What do you think of this kind of service? And is my "actual" layover time (accounting for security checks, check-in, etc.) enough to do one of these tours?
Thanks in advance to everyone who chimes in on this!
First question: Will my checked baggage be transferred automatically? I have a single ticket from KTI to YUL (Air Canada ticket—KTI-ICN operated by Asiana (codeshare) and ICN-YUL by Air Canada).
Second question: I saw it’s possible to join free guided tours (Airport Transit Tour). What do you think of this kind of service? And is my "actual" layover time (accounting for security checks, check-in, etc.) enough to do one of these tours?
Thanks in advance to everyone who chimes in on this!
Hi everyone,
I'm heading to Namibia next May. I'm planning to take a first flight from Paris to Johannesburg with Air France, departing at 11:20 PM and arriving at 11:05 AM in Johannesburg. Then a second flight from Johannesburg to Windhoek at 3:25 PM with South African Airways.
Four hours between the two flights seems enough to catch my connection, but a friend told me I should maybe take the 5:30 PM flight instead because I need to go through immigration, collect my luggage, and check in again. Apparently, I have to do this because I bought the two tickets separately (it's actually much cheaper).
What do you think?
Also, in terms of South African airlines, which one do you think is the most reliable between South African Airways and Airlink?
Thanks for your advice!!
So, even before starting my explanation, I’d like to introduce myself since this is my first post on the forum :) I’m Jérôme, a huge Asia enthusiast, and I’m currently in the process of moving to Japan with my family in 2028.
Now, onto the topic :)
We’re a family of four traveling together to Seoul, with two separate bookings.
Our original itinerary was: Madrid → Doha → Seoul (March 23–24)
The issue is that our entire outbound flight was canceled, and the airline simply rescheduled the Madrid → Doha leg. Now we’re left with an incomplete journey, with no solution to reach our final destination (Seoul).
Since then:
- Can’t modify flights online (technical error every time) - Can’t get help via chat or WhatsApp - Phone support is unreachable, and the usual French number isn’t working right now
We don’t want a refund. We just want to be rerouted to Seoul, as our original ticket promised.
We’re flexible:
- On dates (we can leave on March 21 or 22 instead of the 23rd) - On the itinerary (different layovers if needed)
Have any of you dealt with this before? Do you know how to unlock a booking in this case or get a rerouting? We’re considering going straight to the airport to resolve it at the Qatar Airways counter....
Thanks so much for your help! 😊
Now, onto the topic :)
We’re a family of four traveling together to Seoul, with two separate bookings.
Our original itinerary was: Madrid → Doha → Seoul (March 23–24)
The issue is that our entire outbound flight was canceled, and the airline simply rescheduled the Madrid → Doha leg. Now we’re left with an incomplete journey, with no solution to reach our final destination (Seoul).
Since then:
- Can’t modify flights online (technical error every time) - Can’t get help via chat or WhatsApp - Phone support is unreachable, and the usual French number isn’t working right now
We don’t want a refund. We just want to be rerouted to Seoul, as our original ticket promised.
We’re flexible:
- On dates (we can leave on March 21 or 22 instead of the 23rd) - On the itinerary (different layovers if needed)
Have any of you dealt with this before? Do you know how to unlock a booking in this case or get a rerouting? We’re considering going straight to the airport to resolve it at the Qatar Airways counter....
Thanks so much for your help! 😊
Hi,
We just received an email from Volotea saying our flight time has changed (by more than 2 hours).
The email states "you can request a free date change."
If I change the date, will the flight price stay the same as the original price, or will I have to pay the difference?
Specifically: Our flight on the 7th is 46.25 €, and the one on the 8th is 92.51 €. If we switch to the 8th, how much will we pay?
When I request the date change to the 8th, it says "No additional fees."
Thanks and have a great day! 🙂
Hi everyone,
We’re going on a Nile cruise.
My question:
We’re taking off from Brussels Airport to land in Cairo.
Then we have to catch a second flight to Luxor.
How does that work—do we pick up our luggage, do we have to exit and then re-enter the airport?
Thanks for your help, tips, and advice, etc.…