Interview du CEO de South African Airways, qui annonce un plan de restructuration:
-SAA also announced that it would close the Paris route, which has been losing money, in October.
The airliner said part of its fleet -- one owned and five leased B747-400 aircraft which are expensive to operate -- would be grounded.
Sortie de la flotte des 747-400 d'ici 1an.
Donc comme il est dit plus haut, suppression de CDG(mais aussi de ZRH). La ligne CPT-FRA sera aussi surement supprimé, voila voila...
source: www.airwise.com
La guerre salit tous ceux qui la font: au fil des mois et des années, j'ai vu les deux bords verser dans le mal, j'ai vu le mal affronté le mal, et le bien, ce qu'il y'a de bon dans l'humain, devenir la victime des deux.
La compagnie SAA connaissait des difficultes depuis longtemps...
Sa cure d'amincissement est vitale, elle etait une des dernieres majors a ne pas s'etre restructurée...(ALITALIA exceptée!...).
Il semblerait toutefois que ses partenaires de STAR ALLIANCE manquent sincèrement d'esprit solidaire...
Après avoir laché VARIG pour flirter avec son archi-rivale TAM, c'est maintenant SAA qu'ils delaissent au profit de sa concurrente ETHIOPIAN avec laquelle LH vient de signer un partenariat ces derniers jours.
On peut etre certain qu'AF qui n'attendait pas pareil cadeau du ciel profitera de sa situation monopolistique sur l'axe PARIS-JO'BURG pour augmenter ses frequences deja bi-quotidiennes, et par la meme occasion ses prix en revisant le yield de cette liaison.
Serait-ce là une nouvelle possibilité de voir se poser en Afrique du Sud une A380 aux couleurs d'AF??
Le probleme principal de South African sur CDG etait sa difficulté à attiré les passagers premium.. EN effet, elle n'arrivait pas à rivalisé contre AF sur la Business et la Premiere... Alors que les vols en éco etaient tres souvent plein, et avait des très bon taux de remplissage... C'est donc surtout en éco que cela va posé probleme, en non-stop, Air France va etre en monopole et les tarifs de classe éco, car il ne faut pas oublié que cette suppression va engendré la disparition de 200 sièges par jour en éco... Soit une nette diminution de l'offre..
Il est clair que les prix vont monté, meme si les passagers ont le choix avec des compagnies comme Emirates ou Etihad (Emirates qui passe à 17x/semaine et Etihad qui passe en quotidien sur JNB), les prix vont donc surement etre tiré par la haut... Après, il faut voir si Air France peut ajouté une fréquence ou non sans attaqué le yield en Front-Cabin...
Aujourd'hui, sans véritable concurrence, JNB devient une place de choix pour l'accueil de l'A380, mais seuleument dans un 2nd temps, c'est a dire, pas avant 2010 qui aura la 2eme vague de livraison des A380... Le choix serait soit de passé le vol de jour en 77W d'ici la soit une nouvelle fréquence... Ce qui ne serait pas une si mauvaise idée je trouve si cela ne dégrade pas le yield, qui est ici plutot bon pour Air France, en témoigne le passage du 343 au 772ER..
La guerre salit tous ceux qui la font: au fil des mois et des années, j'ai vu les deux bords verser dans le mal, j'ai vu le mal affronté le mal, et le bien, ce qu'il y'a de bon dans l'humain, devenir la victime des deux.
SAA fera comme bon nombre de compagnies ne desservant pas paris, acheminement vers un autre aéroport européen par une Cie amie :exemple IB pour LAN vers Mad et BMI pour ANZ vers LHR.
Souvent dans ce cas le passager est gagnant sur le prix donc pas d'inquiétude à avoir.
Certes, mais cela ne comblera pas la diminution de l'offre... La demande en directe reste assez forte entre CDG et JNB.. Ici le transfert se fera via FRA ou MUC avec Lufthansa...
Pour Lan, oui en effet, mais pour Air New Zeland, cela ne se fait pas par BMI, ANZ dessert LHR en propre via HKG et via LAX!
La guerre salit tous ceux qui la font: au fil des mois et des années, j'ai vu les deux bords verser dans le mal, j'ai vu le mal affronté le mal, et le bien, ce qu'il y'a de bon dans l'humain, devenir la victime des deux.
Le probleme principal de South African sur CDG etait sa difficulté à attiré les passagers premium.. EN effet, elle n'arrivait pas à rivalisé contre AF sur la Business et la Premiere...
C'est moins un problème de rivalité avec AF qu'une question de marché France-Afrique du Sud relativement étroit pour les voyages d'affaires. Disons que sur ZRH et CDG SAA jouait un peu profil bas avec ses A340 biclasse en leasing. Rien à voir avec les 744 tri-classe sur LHR dont le siège classe Affaires est considérée comme un des meilleurs du monde. Est-il d'ailleurs possible qu'un des A340 finisse sur JNB LHR ?
"Sur le moyen-courrier, nous étions en dehors du marché avec un produit trop haut de gamme." PHG, La Tribune, 18/11/2010.
Relativement etroit? J'ai un sacré doute... AF va proposé d'ici quelques jours, 12 sieges en first, 109 en business par jour... Ce qui en fait la 6eme destination du réseau AF en nombre de sieges Premium, devant GRU, DXB, MEX, HKG, PVG, etc...
J'ai quand meme un doute donc sur la faiblesse du nombre de passager en premium sur JNB en traffic Affaire! Surtout que plusieurs entreprises francaises sont bien implantés en Afrique du Sud, Bouygues pour ne cité qu'elle! Les liens sont assez important quand meme entre l'Afrique du Sud... Apres, oui, un nombre des sieges premium sont occupés en tant que destination touristique (exemple d'un animateur francais par exemple..) mais je ne pense pas que le nombre de siege proposé s'explique seuleument par l'attrait de l'Afrique du Sud! Une partie plus importante que les destinations High Yield, peut etre, mais pas plus des 2/3...
La guerre salit tous ceux qui la font: au fil des mois et des années, j'ai vu les deux bords verser dans le mal, j'ai vu le mal affronté le mal, et le bien, ce qu'il y'a de bon dans l'humain, devenir la victime des deux.
Et petit oubli, en effet, les A340 vont se retrouvé sur LHR, étant donné que les 744 vont sortir de la flotte d'ici 1an, la suppression de Paris entrainera la libération de 2 avions, ce qui couvrira une partie des besoins de la compagnie pour LHR!
La guerre salit tous ceux qui la font: au fil des mois et des années, j'ai vu les deux bords verser dans le mal, j'ai vu le mal affronté le mal, et le bien, ce qu'il y'a de bon dans l'humain, devenir la victime des deux.
Les 2 compagnies opèrent dans des conditions assez différentes : pour AF et son hub à CDG c'est en gros le marché USA - Jo'burg, Royaume Uni - Jo'burg, Allemagne - Jo'burg plus le reste de l'Europe ce qui est énorme !
Pour SAA, le hub est à JNB, le marché c'est Paris-JNB, Paris-CPT, Paris-Windhoek, Paris-Gaborone, Paris-Lusaka, Paris-Maputo, Paris-Luanda, Paris-Lilongwe, y a pas photo...
Et puis l'A340 qui fait la sieste à CDG toute la journée, en terme de rentabilité c'est moyen...
"Sur le moyen-courrier, nous étions en dehors du marché avec un produit trop haut de gamme." PHG, La Tribune, 18/11/2010.
Ah d'accord, je vois ou tu veux en venir! Oui, il est clair que le hub de JNB souffre de sa position géographique, il se limite au marché sud africain et aux quelques pays alentours, rien de plus!
C'est en effet le probleme de SAA, c'est a dire des avions qui vole seuleument 10h/jour contre 15h/jour pour les compagnies européennes... La plupart des destinations européennes sont dans ce cas pour South African! Cela mange un bon nombre d'avion, "malheureusement", c'est ce que les passagers demandent!
La guerre salit tous ceux qui la font: au fil des mois et des années, j'ai vu les deux bords verser dans le mal, j'ai vu le mal affronté le mal, et le bien, ce qu'il y'a de bon dans l'humain, devenir la victime des deux.
Bonjour!
Ce n'est pas possible de voir l'airbus a380 sous les couleurs de AF se poser a Johanasbourg, parce-qu'Air France a l'intention d'utiliser ses airbus a380 sur l'Amerique du Nord L'asie seulement d'apres www.airbus.com et www.airfrance.fr si je ne me trompe pas.
Merci d'avance.
b1kuby53.
Lors de l'achat de celui-ci, oui, il etait entierement destiné a l'Amerique du Nord et l'Asie. Mais les choses changent avec le temps. La premiere destination de l'A380 pour AF n'est plus JFK ou YUL, c'est NRT. Alors que pourtant, AF avait annoncé que cela serait JFK.
Absolument rien est acquis ou que ce soit, en économie ou ailleurs. Une déclaration faite deux semaines plus tot peut etre erroné aujourd'hui.
Donc pour reiteré, aujourd'hui, les destinations prévus dans un premier temps sont:NRTJFKYUL
Dans un 2nd temps:PEKLAX
Dans un 3eme temps:PVGSIN
Et les destinations qui sont étudiés aujourd'hui, sont:GRUJNBMEXHKG
De meme, je réaffirme que 14 A380 sera, dans le futur, le strict minimum de la flotte d'AF.. Elle devrait s'établir autour de 18 appareils normalement.
La guerre salit tous ceux qui la font: au fil des mois et des années, j'ai vu les deux bords verser dans le mal, j'ai vu le mal affronté le mal, et le bien, ce qu'il y'a de bon dans l'humain, devenir la victime des deux.
Bonjour!
Merci d'avoir porte l'interet sur l'airbus a 380 d'Air France. Mais moi j'aimerais savoir si en juin 2009 l'airbus a 380 va assurer la liason entre Paris? Parce-que moi je demeure a Montreal et je veux faire une envolee a bord de l'airbus a 380-800 des qu'il commence a desservir ma ville.
Merci d'avance.
Maltchinski Felix.
Normalement, l'A380 etait prevu a la base sur YUL en saison été 2009...
En 2008(saison été), AF operera normalement 4x/jour et puis en 2009, réduction a 3x/jour dont un vol en 380. Normalement, les 3 premiers A380 livrés en 2009, devait etre operés simultanément sur NRT, YUL et JFK, sauf que le vol sur NRT qui interesse AF necessite 1.5 avions pour operer en quotidien.. De même, j'entend depuis quelques temps que les 3 premiers A380 seront affectés sur NRT.. Et de l'autre coté, j'entend que YUL passera a 3x/jour en 2009 avec l'A380.. On est donc encore dans le flou...
Pour infos, les livraisons s'étale de 2009 a 2012 a raison de 3 appareils par an!
La guerre salit tous ceux qui la font: au fil des mois et des années, j'ai vu les deux bords verser dans le mal, j'ai vu le mal affronté le mal, et le bien, ce qu'il y'a de bon dans l'humain, devenir la victime des deux.
Compagnies aériennes › Afrique du Sud · 77 replies
Je ne peux que vous recommander la plus grande prudence avec la compagnie aérienne SAA, en effet ils étaient au bord du dépôt de bilan avant le Covid-19, alors…
Compagnies aériennes › Zambie / Afrique du Sud · 4 replies
Je fais Bruxelles - Heathrow - Johannesburg - Ndola (Zambie). J'ai le choix entre deux vols, un opéré majoritairement par british airways et l'autre par South…
Je constate qu'il y a peu de commentaires récents- ou j'ai mal sélectionné mes recherches- sur les vols South African Airways. J'ai entendu plusieurs "on-dit"…
Voila, je signale dans ce post une particularité de la compagnie South African Airways. Lorsque l'on prend un vol Europe/Afrique du sud avec eux tous les vols…
Bonjour,
Je pense partir bientôt pour la Malaisie
J'ai vu des prix interessant et vol direct de Paris avec Malaysia Airlines
Est ce une compagnie fiable?
Merci pour vos retours
J'effectue régulièrement des voyages depuis plus de vingt ans
maís c'est la première fois qu'un compagnies me traite si mal que Air France.
Deux voyages, deux fois des problèmes. Le dernier:
Voyage de Séoul à Rennes. Dernière partie de París CDG à Rennes par Air France.
J'arrive à Paris et je me rends directement chez Air France pour obtenir la carte d'embarquement jusqu'à Rennes. On n'y assure que mon bagage suit jusqu'à Rennes.
Arrivé à Rennes, pas de bagage, comme c'est le cas de 5 personnes.
Le bureau d'Air France est fermé et le oersonnel de l'aéroport m'assure qu''il y a rarement quelqu'un.
Avec l'aide du personnel de l'aéroport, je fais une réclamation par internet et Mon bagage est quadi directement localisé, en conséquence je l'aurai le lendemain.
4 jours plus tard, le bagage est toujours au même endroitvà CDG, rien ne bouge.
Le problème est qu'Air France m'a pas de service clientèle. Ce qu'ils appellent service clientes, c'est un service qui répond après une heure et qui vous répète ce qu''il y a sur le FORMULAIRE informatique. Aucune coordination, aucune moyen de faire bouger les choses, je suppose que Air France préfère me payer l'indemnisation après 21 jours que se bouger le cul.
J'ai déjà eu des bagages égarés dans d'autres voyages maís c'est la première fois que je vous un tel je-m'en-foutisme foutisme et manque de professionalisme..
Hi there,
We had planned a trip to Sicily in August, and due to the volcanic eruption of Mount Etna, my flight was canceled. The airline is refunding the outbound flight, but none of the non-refundable expenses: accommodation booked through Booking, rental car, and the return flight aren’t covered. My SUPER Gold card doesn’t work in this specific case! :( If anyone has been in this situation, could you let me know if you were able to get any recourse and, if so, how?
Thanks in advance
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August.
My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi,
I booked an Etihad ticket on their website for Dusseldorf-Abu Dhabi. In the first name field, I entered all my first names (something I never do and I regret it, but the site was confusing). Everything is spelled correctly, but the problem is that I just received my new passport and only my first two first names and the first letter of the third appear—there’s no trace of the last one.
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in.
Thanks for your feedback!
Hi everyone,
Next January, I’m heading to India.
My outbound flight is with Emirates from Paris to Dubai, then another Emirates flight from Dubai to Calcutta.
Could anyone tell me how the connection works? I’ve heard there’s a dedicated Emirates zone, but how does it actually work in practice—I’ve got a 2-hour layover.
Thanks so much!
Take care.
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon.
I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport.
Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…).
AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly.
On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double!
In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others?
Given the price difference, I’m hesitant…
Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go?
Thanks,
HERVE
Hi everyone, I’ve unfortunately only just noticed that I booked two flight tickets, but I made a mistake on the second first name. Basically, my computer auto-filled and typed my first name twice, so both tickets are in my first name. Only the last names—mine and my friend’s—are correct.
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common).
I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows:
- Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes;
- A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late;
- Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens);
- Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight;
- If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation;
- The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason;
- In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/
Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed.
- Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps.
- Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation.
- If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/
- If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed.
- The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt.
- Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont.
- Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia.
Sincerely,
Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding.
Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage...
Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket.
On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata
On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto
I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer.
Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine.
I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket?
(It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania.
The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines.
So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers.
Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this.
Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops.
Do any of you have updates?
Thanks!
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG.
Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover?
We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker).
We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA.
For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai.
Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)?
We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one).
The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much!
I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul?
I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace.
It’s this model:
https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date."
See the photo.
Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?