TRANSPORT - Ils voyageaient à bord d'un avion Vietnam Airlines...Vingt-quatre personnes voyageant à bord d'un avion Vietnam Airlines, qui a atterri à l'aéroport de Roissy mercredi matin, ont été blessés lors d'un incident dont la nature n'a pas été précisé, selon des sources aéroportuaires. Huit d'entre elles ont été hospitalisées à l'hôpital Robert-Ballanger (Seine-Saint-Denis), les autres sont restées en observation au centre médical d'urgence de l'aéroport de Roissy, selon une des sources aéroportuaires.
La gravité de l'état de santé des personnes hospitalisées n'a pas été précisée. Selon les deux sources, une partie d'entre eux souffraient de «contusions et membres cassés». Il s'agit de 22 passagers et de deux membres d'équipages. «Il pourrait s'agir d'un trou d'air», a indiqué une de ces sources.
Un rapport sous 48 heuresD'après une autre source contactée par 20minutes.fr, l'incident ne s'est pas déroulé sur la pistes et n'a aucun rapport avec les controleurs aériens, assure-t-on. D'où l'hypothèse la plus probable selon cette source: le trou d'air. Contactée par 20minutes.fr, la companie aérienne n'a pas encore répondu.
Il faut, au pire attendre 48 heures pour connaître les circonstances de l'incident, puisque les pilotes sont tenus de faire un rapport sur leur vol et de l'envoyer sous 48 heures à sa compagnie et à la Direction générale de l'aviation civiles (DGAC).
Maud Pierron avec AFP
Outre le fait qu'un "trou d'air" n'a aucune existence aéronautique, on peut tout de même s'étonner que le CDB ait décidé de la poursuite du vol avec 24 blessés à bord dont (au moins) 2 graves...
Jusqu'à preuve du contraire le CDB est seul maître à bord. L'enquête déterminera les causes et les conséquences de cet incident et il est toujours amusant de lire de pseudo professionnels porter un jugement sur un fait ou une personne sans avoir la moindre connaissance, autre que celle distillée par des journalistes qui n'en savent pas plus.
... on peut tout de même s'étonner que le CDB ait décidé de la poursuite du vol avec 24 blessés à bord dont (au moins) 2 graves...
Selon nos voisins anglais, un peu plus précis et moins dans le sensationnel que les medias français, l'incident se serait produit dans l'espace aerien russe donc pas tout a coté de Paris tout de mm et on peut s'etonner de la poursuite du vol surtout avec des PN dans les blessés ! maintenant il faut peut etre aussi relativiser la "gravité journalistique" des blessures!
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
l'incident se serait produit dans l'espace aerien russe donc pas tout a coté de Paris tout de mm et on peut s'etonner de la poursuite du vol surtout avec des PN dans les blessés !
C'est bien ce que je me dis. Soit les blessés sont plus légers que ce qui a été dit, soit nous n'avons pas tous les détails de cette affaire (ce qui est vraisemblable), soit il est effectivement étrange que le CDB n'ait pas interrompu le vol au lieu de poursuivre pendant 7 heures le voyage avec des blessés grave à bord, alors que la route est jalonnée d'aéroports importants pouvant se prêter à un atterrissage et permettre l'évacuation des cas les plus graves vers un hôpital. Mais 'étrange' ne signifie pas 'anormal'. Il faudrait avoir des détails que manifestement nous n'avons pas.
En tout cas votre réponse à michel446 est plus réfléchie que la première postée. Mais contrairement à ce que vous dites ce n'était pas le sens de votre premier message que voici :
Outre le fait qu'un "trou d'air" n'a aucune existence aéronautique, on peut tout de même s'étonner que le CDB ait décidé de la poursuite du vol avec 24 blessés à bord dont (au moins) 2 graves...
dans lequel vous n'émettez aucun doute sur les informations connues au sujet de cet incident.
En tout cas votre réponse à michel446 est plus réfléchie que la première postée. Mais contrairement à ce que vous dites ce n'était le sens de votre premier message.
hier au journal ils ont parler et on a vu des passagers qui ont expliquer ce qui est arrivée
un trou d air , mais ils n'ont pas eu le temps d'attacher les ceintures malgre les voyants allumés et certain on toucher avec leurs tetes le plafond ou se trouvent les baggages cabines
voila
Tant mieux pour vous de croire quelqu'un qui n'était pas présent à bord et qui n'a aucune connaissance de cet incident. Comme quoi certains ne sont pas difficiles à convaincre.
Des raisons possible pour la poursuite du vol est la nationalité des blessés.
La Russie exige pour certaine nationalité un visa, la barrière de la langue le Vietnam a été colonie française on peut donc raisonnablement penser qu'une part importante des passager parle français, l'assistance au sol pour la poursuite du vol des autre passagers.
Des raisons possible pour la poursuite du vol est la nationalité des blessés.
La Russie exige pour certaine nationalité un visa,
J'en doute. Dans les cas urgent, même la Russie se montre coopérante. J'ai personnellement vécu des cas similaires et les Russes ont fait leur travail, à défaut de montrer un quelconque entrain à le faire, certes.
Pour les blessés certainement souple. Mais qu'en est-t-il des autres passagers doivent-t-ils rester en zone international ou son-t-ils logés en attendant de pouvoir poursuivre le vol.
Tant mieux pour vous de croire quelqu'un qui n'était pas présent à bord et qui n'a aucune connaissance de cet incident. Comme quoi certains ne sont pas difficiles à convaincre.
Je parlais de l'existence du "trou d'air", en disant que je croyais Albathor, car il y connait plus que moi vu son métier.
Je n'ai pas parlé des circonstances de cet accident.
Avant de critiquer à tout va, apprenez à réfléchir.
Des raisons possible pour la poursuite du vol est la nationalité des blessés. ... La Russie exige pour certaine nationalité un visa, ...
Non pas ds ce cas la il ya plusieurs exemples de deroutement en Siberie (dont un B777 de AF pour des pbl moteurs ) ou les passagers ont été accueillis sur le sol russe, mais sans réelles libertés c'est vrai le + souvent confinés ds un hotel.
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
'incident se serait produit dans l'espace aerien russe donc pas tout a coté de Paris tout de mm et on peut s'etonner de la poursuite du vol surtout avec des PN dans les blessés ! maintenant il faut peut etre aussi relativiser la "gravité journalistique" des blessures!
Je n'ai pas toujours reçu le numéro d'aujourd'hui de VietNam Shipper dont le créneau concerne toutes les actualités du transport aérien et maritime. Peut-être que l'on attend de connaitre le rapport du Commandant de bord, ainsi que la lecture des boites noires.
J'ai entr'aperçu un article relatant les déclarations de VN Airlines. Il est dit que l'avion a traversé un trou d'air (sans avoir précisé l'heure, donc on ignore si c'est 3 H après le décollage ou 3 H avant l'atterrissage), provoquant des blessures aux passagers qui n'étaient pas attachés et à 3 personnes de l'équipage, en service. Il y a eu au total 21 personnes blessées dont 3 hôtesses ou stewards, 9 personnes ont dû être transférées à l'hôpital pour examen. Il semble que la seule personne qui soit la plus atteinte est un membre de l'équipage.
VN Airlines effectue des démarches au près de la compagnie d'assurances, au près des autorités aéroportuaires de CDG, au près du service technique d'Air France qui effectue les contrôles techniques de l'avion.
Beaucoup de personnes se posent des questions sur la décision du commandant de bord qui a poursuivi sa route. Il est clair que si les blessures ne sont pas importantes ni vitales, et qu'il fallait continuer 3 heures de vol pour être mieux pris en charge en France, le commandant a peut-être pris une bonne décision. Si malgré tout, le commandant avait pris la décision de débarquer sur un aéroport quelconque, on se demande comment réagiront les passagers (égoïsme habituel et réputé) qui ne sont nullement blessés.
On se rappelle que VN Airlines a montré beaucoup de prudence dans le passé en cas d'incident. Un atterrissage forcé pour une vitre fêlée du cockpit en Azerbidjian et les passagers n'étaient pas très contents, du fait des formalités astreignantes avant d'être acheminé es dans un hôtel pour 24 H avant qu'un autre avion venant du VN vienne les chercher.
J'ai assisté moi-même au manque de courtoisie d'un français qui hurlait dans un hôtel 4 étoiles à cause d'une lenteur du personnel qui accueillait les passagers d'un vol qui a échappé de justesse à un crash, si le commandant de bord n'avait pris une bonne décision de stopper le décollage avant qu'il ne soit trop tard, à cause des moteurs qui ont surchauffé alors que l'avion roulait à pleine vitesse pour le décollage.
Enfin pour votre information l'avion qui vient d'Hanoi pour Paris ne survole pas l'espace aérien de la Russie et à 3 H de l'atterrissage, l'avion devrait juste traverser le nord de la Mer Noire au dessus d'Odessa.
Lucky that we have a home/Our Home is Nha May Man/Passing rain and dry seasons/In a full-of-love atmosphere/Besides my new family/I have brothers and sisters/The sun shines over the skies/Let's stay here, with all of us,
Oct 20 (Reuters) - Thirty passengers on a Vietnam Airlines flight to Paris were injured when their plane hit an air pocket over Russia and lost altitude abruptly, a spokeswoman for the airline said on Wednesday.
The aircraft, a Boeing 777 departing from Hanoi, landed at 0515 GMT at Charles De Gaulle airport near Paris with no technical difficulties, completing its route.
Of the 30 injured passengers, nine passengers and three crew members were being treated in a Paris hospital for injuries which were described as "not severe".
"Their state is not a concern, " the spokeswoman said. (Reporting by Elizabeth Pineau and Tim Hepher)
Donc rien de méchant.
De toute façon, on ne va pas plaindre les passagers qui se sont pris le plafond. Je n'arrive toujours pas à en croire mes yeux quand je vois des gens se précipiter pour détacher leur ceinture dès que le signal lumineux s'éteint! Incroyable.
Par contre bien sûr, les PNC, les PAX toilettes et qui se détendent les jambes ne sont pas responsables de leur blessures.
Suis tous nouveau avec un proble de reservation en gros j'ai pris 3 billet sur vol 24.fr moi mon epouse et mon bébé jusque la tout est bon recu different mail…
Je vais passé une nuit en transit à Pékin, la compagnie nous loge à l’hôtel, Je voudrais savoir si je peux enregistré les bagages jusqu’à Paris, nous ferons un…
Compagnies aériennes › Europe de l'Ouest · 0 replies
Hola!! Les personnels de l'aéroport madrilène de Barajas, chargés de la sécurité à l'embarquement et du contrôle bagages ont lancé un préavis de grève. Le…
Bonjour,
Je pense partir bientôt pour la Malaisie
J'ai vu des prix interessant et vol direct de Paris avec Malaysia Airlines
Est ce une compagnie fiable?
Merci pour vos retours
J'effectue régulièrement des voyages depuis plus de vingt ans
maís c'est la première fois qu'un compagnies me traite si mal que Air France.
Deux voyages, deux fois des problèmes. Le dernier:
Voyage de Séoul à Rennes. Dernière partie de París CDG à Rennes par Air France.
J'arrive à Paris et je me rends directement chez Air France pour obtenir la carte d'embarquement jusqu'à Rennes. On n'y assure que mon bagage suit jusqu'à Rennes.
Arrivé à Rennes, pas de bagage, comme c'est le cas de 5 personnes.
Le bureau d'Air France est fermé et le oersonnel de l'aéroport m'assure qu''il y a rarement quelqu'un.
Avec l'aide du personnel de l'aéroport, je fais une réclamation par internet et Mon bagage est quadi directement localisé, en conséquence je l'aurai le lendemain.
4 jours plus tard, le bagage est toujours au même endroitvà CDG, rien ne bouge.
Le problème est qu'Air France m'a pas de service clientèle. Ce qu'ils appellent service clientes, c'est un service qui répond après une heure et qui vous répète ce qu''il y a sur le FORMULAIRE informatique. Aucune coordination, aucune moyen de faire bouger les choses, je suppose que Air France préfère me payer l'indemnisation après 21 jours que se bouger le cul.
J'ai déjà eu des bagages égarés dans d'autres voyages maís c'est la première fois que je vous un tel je-m'en-foutisme foutisme et manque de professionalisme..
Hi there,
We had planned a trip to Sicily in August, and due to the volcanic eruption of Mount Etna, my flight was canceled. The airline is refunding the outbound flight, but none of the non-refundable expenses: accommodation booked through Booking, rental car, and the return flight aren’t covered. My SUPER Gold card doesn’t work in this specific case! :( If anyone has been in this situation, could you let me know if you were able to get any recourse and, if so, how?
Thanks in advance
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August.
My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi,
I booked an Etihad ticket on their website for Dusseldorf-Abu Dhabi. In the first name field, I entered all my first names (something I never do and I regret it, but the site was confusing). Everything is spelled correctly, but the problem is that I just received my new passport and only my first two first names and the first letter of the third appear—there’s no trace of the last one.
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in.
Thanks for your feedback!
Hi everyone,
Next January, I’m heading to India.
My outbound flight is with Emirates from Paris to Dubai, then another Emirates flight from Dubai to Calcutta.
Could anyone tell me how the connection works? I’ve heard there’s a dedicated Emirates zone, but how does it actually work in practice—I’ve got a 2-hour layover.
Thanks so much!
Take care.
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon.
I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport.
Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…).
AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly.
On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double!
In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others?
Given the price difference, I’m hesitant…
Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go?
Thanks,
HERVE
Hi everyone, I’ve unfortunately only just noticed that I booked two flight tickets, but I made a mistake on the second first name. Basically, my computer auto-filled and typed my first name twice, so both tickets are in my first name. Only the last names—mine and my friend’s—are correct.
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common).
I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows:
- Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes;
- A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late;
- Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens);
- Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight;
- If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation;
- The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason;
- In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/
Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed.
- Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps.
- Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation.
- If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/
- If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed.
- The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt.
- Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont.
- Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia.
Sincerely,
Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding.
Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage...
Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket.
On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata
On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto
I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer.
Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine.
I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket?
(It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania.
The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines.
So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers.
Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this.
Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops.
Do any of you have updates?
Thanks!
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG.
Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover?
We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker).
We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA.
For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai.
Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)?
We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one).
The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much!
I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul?
I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace.
It’s this model:
https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date."
See the photo.
Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?