alors merci pour votre aide a l'avance
Air France: boeing 777-300 ou A340-300?
by Patetisa
This discussion is in French, the community’s main language.
Original post
Bonjour, J'aimerais avoir des conseils sur c'est 2 type avions .en classe éco bien sur !
pour un vol yul cdg, nous avons le choix des 2 avions quel est plus confortable, espace et douceur de l'avion en vol pour un vol en toute sérénité?
je sais que le 340-300 a une configuration 2-4-2 pas de voisin :) un +, sur l'autre un 3-3-3 un voisin ... un -
le 777 semble beaucoup plus gros que 340.
pour l'instant les sièges possible pour résevation ne sont que sur les 340 car il ne sont pas sur encore de la config sur le 777,
le 340 on de la dispo au ailes mais le 777 lui semble ne pas avoir bien de dispo au départ a ce niveau car il y a toujours des sièges mis de coté pour les membre silver
et l'éco commence au centre des ailes .
sur le 777 peut ont prendre des siège meme apres les ailes sans ce faire brassé comme dans un lave vaisselle . je n'ai que pris des 747-400 avec AF et
j'ai adoré cette avions, malheureusement il vont les retiré du moin sur montreal .
alors merci pour votre aide a l'avance
alors merci pour votre aide a l'avance
Bonjour,
Déjà petite rectification : les 77W AF ne sont pas en 3-3-3 mais en... 3-4-3 😇
Pour ma part, ma préférence irait au 343 : bien que le vol soit légèrement plus long (30 min) en raison d'une vitesse de croisière légèrement plus basse, les sièges y sont plus larges (18" contre 17" en 77W, le pitch est à 32" pour les deux), et le tout est plus silencieux (eh oui, 4 CFM56 font moins de bruit que 2 GE90-115B).
Voilà pour mon avis 🙂
Déjà petite rectification : les 77W AF ne sont pas en 3-3-3 mais en... 3-4-3 😇
Pour ma part, ma préférence irait au 343 : bien que le vol soit légèrement plus long (30 min) en raison d'une vitesse de croisière légèrement plus basse, les sièges y sont plus larges (18" contre 17" en 77W, le pitch est à 32" pour les deux), et le tout est plus silencieux (eh oui, 4 CFM56 font moins de bruit que 2 GE90-115B).
Voilà pour mon avis 🙂
Contributions CC BY-SA
Salut Patetisa,
Sans hésitation aucune, l'A340 : beaucoup plus silencieux, sièges plus larges et plus confortables.
Les 777-300 d'AF vont tous être en config 3-4-3 en éco. Même moi qui ne suis pas large, je me sens oppressé. Seuls point positifs sur cette config, l'écran vidéo et le choix des programmes plus grand que sur A340.
Bon voyage!
Sans hésitation aucune, l'A340 : beaucoup plus silencieux, sièges plus larges et plus confortables.
Les 777-300 d'AF vont tous être en config 3-4-3 en éco. Même moi qui ne suis pas large, je me sens oppressé. Seuls point positifs sur cette config, l'écran vidéo et le choix des programmes plus grand que sur A340.
Bon voyage!
Une petite question sur les 777 300ER qui font Paris Singapour.
Mais sur ceux de Singapore Airlines en 3-3-3 il me semble.
La largeur des sièges et le pitch sont identiques que sur ceux d'AF ?
C'est standard sur les modèles d'avions ?
Merci.
Je cherche à savoir si il serait plus confortable en termes de taille de siège et de pitch de voyager sur les Boeing 777-200 ER d'Air Austral à partir de l'année prochaine ou les 777-300 Er de la Singapore. En économique.
Merci.
Merci.
Air France, KLM et Emirates sont les seules compagnies a avoir choisi de mettre leurs 777 en 3-4-3 en éco, il n'y a pas de configuration "standard" c'est au choix de la compagnie (de même pour la largeur des sièges).
Sur Singapore, la longueur inter-sièges / largeur des sièges est variable selon le type de 777 : * 772 : 32/17.5 * 77E : 34/17.5 * 773 : 32/18 * 77W : 32/19
Sur Singapore, la longueur inter-sièges / largeur des sièges est variable selon le type de 777 : * 772 : 32/17.5 * 77E : 34/17.5 * 773 : 32/18 * 77W : 32/19
Contributions CC BY-SA
Tu trouves ça où comme info ?
Air France, KLM et Emirates sont les seules compagnies a avoir choisi de mettre leurs 777 en 3-4-3 en éco, il n'y a pas de configuration "standard" c'est au choix de la compagnie (de même pour la largeur des sièges).
Sur Singapore, la longueur inter-sièges / largeur des sièges est variable selon le type de 777 : * 772 : 32/17.5 * 77E : 34/17.5 * 773 : 32/18 * 77W : 32/19
Un 777-300 ER c'est un 77W selon cette typologie ?
Sur Singapore, la longueur inter-sièges / largeur des sièges est variable selon le type de 777 : * 772 : 32/17.5 * 77E : 34/17.5 * 773 : 32/18 * 77W : 32/19
Un 777-300 ER c'est un 77W selon cette typologie ?
772 : 777-200
77E : 777-200ER
77L : 777-200LR (Singapore Airlines n'en a pas)
773 : 777-300
77W : 777-300ER
🙂
🙂
Contributions CC BY-SA
Précis merci.
Et les Boeing 777-200 ER d'Air Austral.
T'as les données des sièges ?
Paris Singapour sur SI il n'y a plus de 747 je crois ?
Paris Singapour sur SI il n'y a plus de 747 je crois ?
Pour Air Austral je n'ai rien trouvé de fiable donc je préfère ne rien dire.
En effet, plus de 747 sur Paris - Singapour via Singapore Airlines.
En effet, plus de 747 sur Paris - Singapour via Singapore Airlines.
Contributions CC BY-SA
Je te remercie pour lé réponse.
De toute façon les différences sont au maximum de 2 ou 3 pouces.
C'est peu et beaucoup à la fois en fait.
Merci encore.
Vu le site http://www.seatguru.com/ Top. Mais Air Austral pas enregistrée.
Vu le site http://www.seatguru.com/ Top. Mais Air Austral pas enregistrée.
Bonjour,
Je refais remonter ce topic pour poser une question simple : Comment sont répartis les différentes sortes de 77W d'Air France dans les destinations ?
Je sais que la version 472 passagers sont réservés aux vols COI :
Mais cette version de 325 passagers :
Et cette version de 303 passagers :
Quelles sont leurs destinations respectives ? Ca peut paraître une question inutile, mais je suis curieux, et de plus il me semble mieux de voyager dans la première cabine Voyageur de la version 303 pax, que dans n'importe quelle des autres cabines voyageurs sur les autres versions !
Et une autre question : Est-il vrai que l'on peut se retrouver dans des 77W en configuration COI sur d'autres destinations que COI à certains moments de l'année ??!
Merci ! (plans de cabine : site Air France).
Je refais remonter ce topic pour poser une question simple : Comment sont répartis les différentes sortes de 77W d'Air France dans les destinations ?
Je sais que la version 472 passagers sont réservés aux vols COI :
Mais cette version de 325 passagers :
Et cette version de 303 passagers :
Quelles sont leurs destinations respectives ? Ca peut paraître une question inutile, mais je suis curieux, et de plus il me semble mieux de voyager dans la première cabine Voyageur de la version 303 pax, que dans n'importe quelle des autres cabines voyageurs sur les autres versions !
Et une autre question : Est-il vrai que l'on peut se retrouver dans des 77W en configuration COI sur d'autres destinations que COI à certains moments de l'année ??!
Merci ! (plans de cabine : site Air France).
Bonjour !
Merci de votre réponse, je voulais en fait savoir qu'est-ce qui déterminait si on allait tombé sur un 77W en configuration 303 ou 325 passagers sur les destinations autres que COI évidemment ? 😛
Merci de votre réponse, je voulais en fait savoir qu'est-ce qui déterminait si on allait tombé sur un 77W en configuration 303 ou 325 passagers sur les destinations autres que COI évidemment ? 😛
Peut etre le fait de faire une simulation de reservation sur une destination choisie, a mon avis et le plan cabine apparaitra.
En tout cas sur pour Buenos Aires et Sao Paolo c'est une configuration a 303 avec la Premium Voyageur et je pense qu'on se penche vers cette configuration et que l'ancienne configuration va disparaitre pour les destinations autres que COI.
Tout depend si la Premium Voyageur est deployee ou non? Car si la Premium Voyageur est deployee => configuration a 303 et sinon ancienne configuration
Tout depend si la Premium Voyageur est deployee ou non? Car si la Premium Voyageur est deployee => configuration a 303 et sinon ancienne configuration
Prochains vols :
Ah, cela veut dire que la config 303 pax avec premium voyageur rapporte plus à Air France que la version à 325 pax sans la premium ?? 🤪
Oui je pense, une classe inauguree (la Premium Voyageur), une configuration en 3-4-3 (peut etre une meilleure rentabilite sur les 772 en P J W Y en quadri classes)
Cela n'engage que mon opinion personnelle, les experts pourront rajouter d'autres avis sur ce theme interessant.
Prochains vols :
Si il généralise l'offre Premium sur toutes leurs destinations, Je suis sur que les gens vont s'aracher les places en premium pour échapper au 3-4-3 en éco 😄
Pour l'instant, ça se voit à la résa. Me semble que tous les appareils long-courrier (hors COI) sont voués à passer au quadri-classe.
Contributions CC BY-SA
Cela veut donc dire que la Premium fait un carton ?
Ça veut surtout dire que la premium rapporte + que la classe éco, et qu'il faut croire qu'AF estime qu'il y a assez de public pour remplacer de l'éco par de l'éco+ (moi j'aurais plutôt remplacé de la biz par de l'éco+, mais je n'ai pas les taux de remplissage et études commerciales, donc...)
Contributions CC BY-SA
Sauf les 744, de mémoire.
En effet oui, mais eux sont ammenés à sortir de flotte à court-terme.
Contributions CC BY-SA
C'est vrai que sans stats c'est un peu dur.. 🤪
Merci !
Mais ils ne toucheront jamais à la Première sur LC, en NEV, pour mettre plus de biz ?
Mais ils ne toucheront jamais à la Première sur LC, en NEV, pour mettre plus de biz ?
Bah la Première, difficile de faire moins quand même...
Contributions CC BY-SA
C'est vrai que 8 places ! ...
Mais sont-elles remplies ? 😇
L'été dernier, des 77W COI ont été utilisé sur CDG > YUL, du fait du low yield pendant l'été, la cabine Alizé était vendu en Voyageur.
Mes vidéos de vols sur Vimeo
Ma carte de voyage sur Openflights
Oula, Alizé pour le même prix que la Voyageur !
Etonnant, ca devait se bousculer pour avoir ces sièges !
Le problème des business class en épi style AC, c'est que deux personnes ne peuvent voyager cote à cote !
Un bon compromis est peut etre celui trouvé par US pour ses Envoy Suite avec des épis tournés dans l'autre sens et des sieges au milieu permettant aux couples de voyager ensemble.
http://www.usairways.com/...irst/envoysuite.html http://www.rmgivideo1.net/envoy_suite/
Ce n'est pas parce qu'une business class offrira des sieges horizontaux que la premiere doit disparaitre. Outre un fauteuil de meilleur qualité, la différence peut se faire avec la restauration "à la carte" ainsi qu'un service au sol très haut de gamme comme ce que proposent LH LX et AF sur ses hubs.
Un bon compromis est peut etre celui trouvé par US pour ses Envoy Suite avec des épis tournés dans l'autre sens et des sieges au milieu permettant aux couples de voyager ensemble.
http://www.usairways.com/...irst/envoysuite.html http://www.rmgivideo1.net/envoy_suite/
Ce n'est pas parce qu'une business class offrira des sieges horizontaux que la premiere doit disparaitre. Outre un fauteuil de meilleur qualité, la différence peut se faire avec la restauration "à la carte" ainsi qu'un service au sol très haut de gamme comme ce que proposent LH LX et AF sur ses hubs.
Cher Damss974,
Une page qui pourrait etre vous interesser, il s'agit du deploiement de la Premium Voyageur sur le reseau Long Courrier, les destinations qui changent de configuration :
http://airlineroute.net/2010/03/04/af-premy-s10/#more-18044
A tres bientot
Une page qui pourrait etre vous interesser, il s'agit du deploiement de la Premium Voyageur sur le reseau Long Courrier, les destinations qui changent de configuration :
http://airlineroute.net/2010/03/04/af-premy-s10/#more-18044
A tres bientot
Prochains vols :
Bonjour,
Merci !
Si je crois cette page, AF n'a pas encore mis en services les 77W avec la premium, soit la version 303 pax ! Apparemment, à partir du 3 mai sur DXB.
Merci !
Si je crois cette page, AF n'a pas encore mis en services les 77W avec la premium, soit la version 303 pax ! Apparemment, à partir du 3 mai sur DXB.
Un bon compromis est peut etre celui trouvé par US pour ses Envoy Suite avec des épis tournés dans l'autre sens et des sieges au milieu permettant aux couples de voyager ensemble.
Merci pour le lien, cette business class semble très bien!
http://www2.usairways.com/en-US/traveltools/intheair/envoyfirst/progressreport.html
Pour le moment seul 3 avions sont équipés dommage🤪. Ce sont des A330-200. Le même type d'appareil que ceux qui effectue le CDG/Philadelphie.
Merci pour le lien, cette business class semble très bien!
http://www2.usairways.com/en-US/traveltools/intheair/envoyfirst/progressreport.html
Pour le moment seul 3 avions sont équipés dommage🤪. Ce sont des A330-200. Le même type d'appareil que ceux qui effectue le CDG/Philadelphie.
Oui, en 330/340 pour moi ca devrait être de la VRAIE Y+ en 2-3-2 !
Je veux pas dénoncer, mais payer un voyage en premium sur 777, pour se taper de la 2-4-2... 😕 Je prefere payer un billet éco sur une autre compagnie qui aménage en 3-3-3 en éco !
Je parle évidemment sur le plan de l'espace, non du service !
Je veux pas dénoncer, mais payer un voyage en premium sur 777, pour se taper de la 2-4-2... 😕 Je prefere payer un billet éco sur une autre compagnie qui aménage en 3-3-3 en éco !
Je parle évidemment sur le plan de l'espace, non du service !
Cher Albathor,
Le F-GSQC ou le F-GZNE?
A tres bientot Cordialement
Le F-GSQC ou le F-GZNE?
A tres bientot Cordialement
Prochains vols :
Si, si. J'ai descendu hier un 77W de CDG à EZE en version 303 pax.
Ah d'accord, excusez-moi 😛 Heureusement qu'il y a marqué : "NOTE ABOVE MENTIONED ROUTES, OPERATING DATES AND DAYS IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE"
Ah d'accord, excusez-moi 😛 Heureusement qu'il y a marqué : "NOTE ABOVE MENTIONED ROUTES, OPERATING DATES AND DAYS IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE"
Il me semble que ce soit le F-GZNE qui a les couleurs skyteam.
Il me semble que ce soit le F-GZNE qui a les couleurs skyteam.
Oui, au dernière nouvelle environ 70% de la flotte 77W est déjà avec la PV, j'avais la liste des avions équipés mais je ne la retrouve plus (de toute façon c'est secret lol).
Oui, au dernière nouvelle environ 70% de la flotte 77W est déjà avec la PV, j'avais la liste des avions équipés mais je ne la retrouve plus (de toute façon c'est secret lol).
Mes vidéos de vols sur Vimeo
Ma carte de voyage sur Openflights
au dernière nouvelle environ 70% de la flotte 77W est déjà avec la PV
Ah ok ! Mais comment se fait-il que cette page nous dit que la première ligne qui servira la PV en 77W sera CDG-DXB en mai prochain ? 😄 Soit elle est complétement fausse, soit ils ne la vendent pas encore "officiellement" ?
Ah ok ! Mais comment se fait-il que cette page nous dit que la première ligne qui servira la PV en 77W sera CDG-DXB en mai prochain ? 😄 Soit elle est complétement fausse, soit ils ne la vendent pas encore "officiellement" ?
Car le titre de la page est "AIRFRANCE Further Expands PReMIUM VOYAGeUR service"
De nombreuses lignes en 77W ont la PV depuis quelques mois: SIN, HKG, NRT, JFK...
Mes vidéos de vols sur Vimeo
Ma carte de voyage sur Openflights
Seuls point positifs sur cette config, l'écran vidéo et le choix des programmes plus grand que sur A340.
Bon voyage!
Tous les avions AF disposent maintenant du programme vidéo avec un minimum de 85 films à l'exception de 7 des 10 B744
Bon voyage!
Tous les avions AF disposent maintenant du programme vidéo avec un minimum de 85 films à l'exception de 7 des 10 B744
Log in first, then come back to this page.
You might also like
More discussions
Hi,
I’m thinking of heading to Malaysia soon.
I’ve seen some great prices and direct flights from Paris with Malaysia Airlines.
Is it a reliable airline?
Thanks for your feedback!
Hello,
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August. My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August. My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Hi there,
We had planned a trip to Sicily in August, and due to the volcanic eruption of Mount Etna, my flight was canceled. The airline is refunding the outbound flight, but none of the non-refundable expenses: accommodation booked through Booking, rental car, and the return flight aren’t covered. My SUPER Gold card doesn’t work in this specific case! :( If anyone has been in this situation, could you let me know if you were able to get any recourse and, if so, how?
Thanks in advance
I’ve been traveling regularly for over twenty years,
but this is the first time an airline has treated me as poorly as Air France.
Two trips, two problems. The latest:
Trip from Seoul to Rennes. Last leg from Paris CDG to Rennes with Air France.
I arrive in Paris and go straight to Air France to get my boarding pass to Rennes. They assure me my baggage is continuing to Rennes.
Arriving in Rennes, no baggage—same as five other people.
The Air France office is closed, and the airport staff tell me there’s rarely anyone there.
With the help of the airport staff, I file a claim online, and my baggage is almost immediately located. As a result, I’m told I’ll have it the next day.
Four days later, the baggage is still in the same place at CDG—nothing’s moving.
The problem is Air France has no customer service. What they call customer service is a department that takes an hour to answer and just repeats what’s on the online form. No coordination, no way to get things moving. I guess Air France would rather pay the compensation after 21 days than actually do something.
I’ve had lost baggage on other trips, but this is the first time I’ve seen such indifference and lack of professionalism.
but this is the first time an airline has treated me as poorly as Air France.
Two trips, two problems. The latest:
Trip from Seoul to Rennes. Last leg from Paris CDG to Rennes with Air France.
I arrive in Paris and go straight to Air France to get my boarding pass to Rennes. They assure me my baggage is continuing to Rennes.
Arriving in Rennes, no baggage—same as five other people.
The Air France office is closed, and the airport staff tell me there’s rarely anyone there.
With the help of the airport staff, I file a claim online, and my baggage is almost immediately located. As a result, I’m told I’ll have it the next day.
Four days later, the baggage is still in the same place at CDG—nothing’s moving.
The problem is Air France has no customer service. What they call customer service is a department that takes an hour to answer and just repeats what’s on the online form. No coordination, no way to get things moving. I guess Air France would rather pay the compensation after 21 days than actually do something.
I’ve had lost baggage on other trips, but this is the first time I’ve seen such indifference and lack of professionalism.
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi,
I booked an Etihad ticket on their website for Dusseldorf-Abu Dhabi. In the first name field, I entered all my first names (something I never do and I regret it, but the site was confusing). Everything is spelled correctly, but the problem is that I just received my new passport and only my first two first names and the first letter of the third appear—there’s no trace of the last one.
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in. Thanks for your feedback!
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in. Thanks for your feedback!
Hi everyone,
Next January, I’m heading to India.
My outbound flight is with Emirates from Paris to Dubai, then another Emirates flight from Dubai to Calcutta.
Could anyone tell me how the connection works? I’ve heard there’s a dedicated Emirates zone, but how does it actually work in practice—I’ve got a 2-hour layover.
Thanks so much!
Take care.
Hi there,
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon. I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport. Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…). AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly. On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double! In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others? Given the price difference, I’m hesitant… Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go? Thanks, HERVE
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon. I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport. Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…). AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly. On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double! In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others? Given the price difference, I’m hesitant… Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go? Thanks, HERVE
Hi everyone, I’ve unfortunately only just noticed that I booked two flight tickets, but I made a mistake on the second first name. Basically, my computer auto-filled and typed my first name twice, so both tickets are in my first name. Only the last names—mine and my friend’s—are correct.
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common). I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common). I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
Hello,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Hi there,
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
Hi,
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
Hi there,
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
Hi,
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
Hi,
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
Hello,
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
Hello,
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Hi everyone,
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
Hi there!
Has anyone taken the direct flight from CDG to Las Vegas with Air France?
Looking forward to your feedback!
Hey everyone,
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
Hi there,
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric
Hi there,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
Hi there,
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry







