Rien d'officiel naturellement (quelques "fuites" internes) et, donc, aucune décision n'est encore prise.
Cependant, l'option serait sérieusement étudiée, celle de supprimer la cabine La Première. Le cas est confirmé sur le flotte 772 (la totalité, 25 appareils, sera donc configurée en version "Loisirs" 35J d'ici 2013/2014 avec la sorite progressive de la flotte 343), les 21 77W pourraient alors suivre pour être reconfigurés en version "COI" 14J ou "Loisirs" 42J. Pas d'info sur ce que pourrait devenir la version 388.
De plus, il est question de densifier encore davantage une partie de la flotte LC en supprimant la cabine Affaires (au début, sur une partie de la flotte 772 avec une nouvelle version W/Y sans cabine J donc ; aucune info concernant la flotte COI).
Nouveau siège J : possiblement la version similaire à celle que prévoit KLM. Le nombre de sièges serait réduit par rapport aux configurations actuelles 332/772/77W/388 (pas d'info si, en conséquence, le nombres de sièges W ou Y augmente + flotte 343 pas concernée).
Tout dépend de la probabilité que cette option prenne forme par rapport aux autres en cours d'étude.
Si cela se confirme, je serais curieux de connaître ce qu'il adviendra de la flotte 388 : comme rentabiliser un tel appareil avec une offre de sièges Premium qui se verrait réduite par rapport à l'actuelle....
Si cela se confirme, je serais curieux de connaître ce qu'il adviendra de la flotte 388 : comme rentabiliser un tel appareil avec une offre de sièges Premium qui se verrait réduite par rapport à l'actuelle....
Vu le remplissage des cabines première, il n'est pas sûr que cela contribue à rentabiliser l'appareil.
Par contre, tout l'étage inférieur et éco et le premier étage 100% affaires et premium éco serait une alternative
Franchement, si AF veut remonter en gamme, pourquoi baisser le nombre de sièges des cabines J et W et augmenter encore plus le Y ?
Supprimer la P n'est pas idiot à condition que la J soit à la hauteur.
Le service est déjà plus que médiocre en Y (et il n'y en déjà plus en MC ...), pourquoi continuer à baisser le confort de cette classe davantage ?
Si AF veut donner une bonne image de marque, ce ne sont pas uniquement les classes J et W qu'il faut travailler mais aussi l'Eco. EY et EK par exemple proposent un excellent service dans la classe Eco et le bouche à oreille fait que les clients en véhiculent une image de qualité, quel que soit le prix du billet acheté.
De plus, il est question de densifier encore davantage une partie de la flotte LC en supprimant la cabine Affaires (au début, sur une partie de la flotte 772 avec une nouvelle version W/Y sans cabine J donc ; aucune info concernant la flotte COI).
Merci Sscfbtsd pour ces fuites.
Supprimer totalement la J d'une partie de la flotte, c'est vraiment du grand n'importe quoi !!
Cela veut dire que sur certaines lignes, AF va d'une part se passer des passagers à plus haute contribution mais surtout, conséquence moins évidente à première vue, va perdre beaucoup de clients fidèles qui prennent AF par espoir de surclassements qui surviennent régulièrement grâce à leur statut élevé (Gold et Plat).
Cela est fréquemment mon cas : lorsque la J est trop chère, j'opte facilement pour la W sachant que la proba de surclassement est toujours correcte.
Si je sais qu'il n'y a plus de J, je n'hésiterai plus à aller voir la concurrence qui sait généralement proposer des tarifs en Affaires bien moins onéreux que ceux d'AF, même si je dois avoir une escale. Mais bien sûr, tout le monde n'a pas le même point de vue ...
il faut juste qu'AF soit cohérent, sur certaines destinations sa Première rivalise à peine voire pas du tout avec la classe Affaires de certains concurrents
le renouvelement de la cabine affaires de certaines compagnies met une claque à AF
si la suppression de la Première chez AF peut permettre de niveler le niveau général de l'avion vers le haut, pourquoi pas...
se priver d'une partie des contributeurs, non, si la cabine Affaires s'améliore
le vrai souci d'AF c'est d'avoir tirer la qualite vers le bas en tirant les prix vers les hauts pour faire croire à du haut de gamme, un peu à l'image des voitures françaises par rapport aux voitures allemandes
la compagnie perd cher des erreurs stratégiques, c'est le cas de beaucoup d'entreprises françaises en général...
IL semble encore une fois que la cie navigue vraiment à vue : il y a quelques mois Juniac annonce une cie qu'il va falloir mettre à niveau pour rivaliser avec SQ , et avec ce que vous nous dites on semble s'acheminer vers du du XL ou du Transavia sur certains vols ! bref si cela s'avère exact on va encore tirer la cie encore plus vers le bas !! Quel dommage et quel gâchis ...
Quand aura t'on donc cette SQ européenne annoncée par JUNIAC ? sûrement pas en passant au tout ECO ou Eco / Premium .
Il y a encore un mois on nous dit à Tahiti pas d'inquiétudes la cie reste pas question de quitter l'escale de PPT et cette semaine branle bas de combat on change tout et on nous annonce que la ligne ppt/lax/ppt risque de fermer ...
AF va pouvoir faire la une du Petit Journal de C+ !! Un mois c'est rouge , un mois après c'est noir !
Les problèmes de management semblent perdurer avec un pas en avant , un pas en arrière ... sans véritable cap sur le long terme .
QF vient de signer avec EK emballé c'est pesé par contre cela semble traîner entre AF et ETYHAD ...encore une fois un manque regrettable de réactivité qui nuit à la cie elle même .
L'utilisation récente de 77W version COI (14J) sur des destinations comme BKK ou MRU a rendu les tarifs Business de plus en plus "stratosphériques" : au départ de GVA, BKK de l'ordre de 6'800 CHF, MRU à près de 9'000 CHF.....est-ce une stratégie payante ??
D'où sortez vous cette information ? Quelles sont vos sources ? À ce jour, la seule information officielle disponible est la suivante et est relative au plan 2015 :
Air France a pour ambition de positionner les classes La Première et Business au meilleur niveau mondial en travaillant sur toutes les composantes de l’offre. Ceci se traduira notamment par un service plus personnalisé et plus proche du client, des prestations améliorées et des investissements dans de nouvelles cabines en classes La Première et Business pour les Boeing 777 et Airbus A380 dès 2014. Cette ambition sera également déclinée en classe Economy, constituant le réservoir de croissance de la Compagnie, notamment par de nouveaux systèmes de distraction à bord.
Le drame de l'existence humaine est de devoir renoncer un jour à être dans la lumière - Hubert Reeves.
certains spéculent que ce serait une variante du diamond seat de chez B/E Aerospace qu'aurait déjà choisi United/Continental
Que penseriez-vous si AF décidez de mettre une variante de ces sièges dans ses avions?
Bon siège? pas assez privatif? accès direct au couloir?
AF et KLM doivent adopter un full flat bed quoiqu'il arrive en Business
leur retard vs la concurrence rien que sur ce point est immense, surtout au prix de la Business chez AF-KLM
le prix qu'on paie aujourd'hui pour un siège qui est juste incliné, c'est de foutage de gueule, n'importe qui voyageant chez un concurrent pour ce prix et qui arriverait sur un vol AF dirait que c'est du premium eco et non un siège digne de s'appeler Business
oui l'ensemble est juste correct, mais est bien en dessous de la concurrence
Le projet d'améliorer les classes avant et notamment la classe affaire avec un lit totalement plat est une bonne chose vis a vis de la concurrence. Mais à quelles conditions se fera-t-il ? En 2006, la mise en service des 777 sur les Antilles avec les NEV en remplacement des 747 s'est traduit (discrètement) par une augmentation de 20 % des tarifs !
oui ma crainte est la même, celle qu'AF augmente encore les prix
de façon analogue, qd je bossais dans l'hôtellerie, j'étais très étonné que les chaînes de mon groupe proposent du wifi en plus dans les chambres pour un surplus ou une hausse du prix de la chambre, alors que n'importe quel concurrent proposait déjà du wifi gratuit depuis 2 ans...
faire payer une nouveauté qui est déjà une généralité ailleurs, c'est une très mauvaise idée
si c'est la stratégie qu'a décidé d'apporter AF, alors ils vont encore attendre quelques années pour refaire un plan de restructuration en constatant qu'ils ont encore une fois de plus foiré...
mais comme toutes les compagnies voyons. LH a recemment innové avec une businnes class des plus banales et un siège peu convainquant. Les tarfis ont néessairement augmenté.
AIR FRANCE ne renonce pas à la première. Comme quoi, les bruits de couloir....
A l’occasion du salon IFTM-Top Résa, Air France confirme un investissement de plusieurs centaines de millions d’euros afin de repositionner ses produits et services au meilleur niveau du secteur.
Avec cette première annonce, la Compagnie, qui a mis la satisfaction clients au cœur de son plan de transformation, démontre la dynamique en cours au sein de l'entreprise pour reconquérir sa place de leader mondial.
Sur son réseau long-courrier, Air France investira plusieurs centaines de millions d’euros pour renouveler ses cabines La Première et Business et faire de sa flotte une référence en termes de confort, de services et de restauration. La Compagnie réaffirme ainsi sa volonté de proposer un service La Première, s'articulant autour de trois valeurs : l'excellence, le sens du détail et le choix.
Ces investissements, rendus possibles grâce aux accords signés dans le cadre du plan Transform 2015, permettront un renouvellement des cabines La Première et Business des Boeing 777 de la Compagnie dès 2014.
Air France a souhaité faire participer ses clients au processus de définition de ses futurs services. Depuis plusieurs semaines, un large panel de voyageurs fréquents est sondé pour déterminer, en prenant en compte leurs attentes et opinions, les grands axes de cette montée en gamme.
Dès cet hiver sur son réseau moyen-courrier, Air France proposera aux voyageurs d'affaires un service de restauration entièrement repensé et inspiré des vols long-courriers, avec plus d'attentions et plus de flexibilité en Business et Premium Economy.
Les passagers abonnés sur la Métropole pourront bénéficier début 2013 de nouveaux avantages : les vols domestiques permettront d’accéder plus rapidement et plus facilement aux statuts Flying Blue Elite et Elite Plus. De plus, la carte d’abonnement Métropole sera étendue à certaines lignes européennes, avec une offre tarifaire adaptée.
Enfin, en première mondiale pour tous ses clients, la Compagnie déploiera courant 2013 une offre de presse digitale gratuite. Cette innovation permettra aux clients de télécharger et d’archiver la presse du jour sur leur tablette ou leur smartphone avant leur vol. Tous les clients bénéficieront par ailleurs de toujours plus de services à la carte et d’autonomie, tout au long de leur voyage.
Ces investissements sur tous les réseaux viendront compléter les récentes réalisations déjà plébiscitées par les clients de la Compagnie : en 2012, Air France a inauguré de nouvelles infrastructures à Paris-Charles de Gaulle, dont le plus grand salon de son réseau, et a intensifié le réaménagement des cabines de sa flotte long-courrier.
« Avec ce plan d'investissement ambitieux, nous illustrons notre volonté de placer la satisfaction du client au cœur de notre stratégie. Des initiatives innovantes viendront dans les mois qui viennent compléter ces projets. Toutes les énergies de l'entreprise sont mobilisées pour repositionner notre offre au meilleur niveau mondial et retrouver notre place de leader » a déclaré Alexandre de Juniac, président-directeur général d'Air France.
Le drame de l'existence humaine est de devoir renoncer un jour à être dans la lumière - Hubert Reeves.
Merci pour ce communiqué rassurant ! AF est très douée au niveau de la rédaction de sa prose marketing !! Souhaitons que tout cela soit suivi des faits pour le bien des passagers . Bravo donc à Juniac qui reste fidèle à ses propos précédents : favoriser l'excellence donc et ne point tomber dans la lowcostisation .
le plan voit trop loin, AF n'est pas réactif
la concurrence va plus vite et pendant ce temps la compagnie va creuser ses pertes
pareil la stratégie qui oublie la classe eco... on parle souvent des voyageurs premium comme étant "haute contribution" àcroire que l'eco n'apporte aucune contribution
Il est vrai qu'il faut que le produit soit innovant et révolutionnaire sous peine d 'avoir plusieurs Airbus de retard car comme vous le soulignez la réactivité n'est pas le point fort d' AF !
Le produit 180 et 127 furent innovants et révolutionnaires mais durant trop peu de temps . Force est de constater que là où British Airways propose un lit en J depuis 20 ans , AF elle n'a toujours pas de lit en J .... alors que tout le monde en propose un .... Donc la réactivité va devoir être inscrite sur le plan 2015 , car sinon la totalité de la flotte ne sera pas équipée avant 2020 et les autres seront déjà passés à autre chose d'encore mieux ...
Cathay devant le mécontentement de ses passagers AFFAIRES n'a pas tardé à repenser et à reproposer une nouvelle cabine , là les passagers ont été vraiment écoutés ....
En tout cas que ceux qui sont contactés par AF pour les nouveaux produits J et P se fassent connaitre car précédemment personne ne fut sondé ni passagers ni PNC !! pour un produit qui ne satisfait au final ni les uns ni les autres ( cabine J trop grande pour le service en 773 en 2/3/2 alors que SQ propose 1/2/1 par exemple et le NEV variable selon les vols peu confortable pour les passagers aussi en 2/3/2 )
Pour info, dernier vol avec LH, repas tout simplement infecte, personnel froid, siège toboggan comme quoi. Finalement AF c'est du luxe.
AF va redevenir LA meilleure compagnie européenne, devant la minable TK.
Les concurrents ont du soucis à se faire. Peut-être ne résisteront-ils pas tout simplement...
MR DE JUNIAC d'après ce qui se raconte en interne semble un homme de terrain ! Bravo à lui ! il voyage , il note , il hume l'air du temps à bord de ses avions ! c'est ainsi que l'on peut se faire une idée des problèmes et des progrès à réaliser ! le simple détail du pain chaud dans l'article de Challenges dénote un soucis profond du détail ... Je lui souhaite bon courage et que AF puisse écrire enfin une nouvelle belle page de son Histoire après des années de flottement !
Pour quoi Air France va si mal? Air France va mal car il n’y a aucune considération envers ses clients. Je pars en métropole dans un moi et demi. Billet…
J'ai lu beaucoup de posts sur ce forum au sujet d'Air France, que nombre d'entre vous trouvent déplorable... Or, quelle fut ma surprise en prenant Air France…
Hi,
I’m thinking of heading to Malaysia soon.
I’ve seen some great prices and direct flights from Paris with Malaysia Airlines.
Is it a reliable airline?
Thanks for your feedback!
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August.
My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Hi there,
We had planned a trip to Sicily in August, and due to the volcanic eruption of Mount Etna, my flight was canceled. The airline is refunding the outbound flight, but none of the non-refundable expenses: accommodation booked through Booking, rental car, and the return flight aren’t covered. My SUPER Gold card doesn’t work in this specific case! :( If anyone has been in this situation, could you let me know if you were able to get any recourse and, if so, how?
Thanks in advance
I’ve been traveling regularly for over twenty years,
but this is the first time an airline has treated me as poorly as Air France.
Two trips, two problems. The latest:
Trip from Seoul to Rennes. Last leg from Paris CDG to Rennes with Air France.
I arrive in Paris and go straight to Air France to get my boarding pass to Rennes. They assure me my baggage is continuing to Rennes.
Arriving in Rennes, no baggage—same as five other people.
The Air France office is closed, and the airport staff tell me there’s rarely anyone there.
With the help of the airport staff, I file a claim online, and my baggage is almost immediately located. As a result, I’m told I’ll have it the next day.
Four days later, the baggage is still in the same place at CDG—nothing’s moving.
The problem is Air France has no customer service. What they call customer service is a department that takes an hour to answer and just repeats what’s on the online form. No coordination, no way to get things moving. I guess Air France would rather pay the compensation after 21 days than actually do something.
I’ve had lost baggage on other trips, but this is the first time I’ve seen such indifference and lack of professionalism.
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi,
I booked an Etihad ticket on their website for Dusseldorf-Abu Dhabi. In the first name field, I entered all my first names (something I never do and I regret it, but the site was confusing). Everything is spelled correctly, but the problem is that I just received my new passport and only my first two first names and the first letter of the third appear—there’s no trace of the last one.
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in.
Thanks for your feedback!
Hi everyone,
Next January, I’m heading to India.
My outbound flight is with Emirates from Paris to Dubai, then another Emirates flight from Dubai to Calcutta.
Could anyone tell me how the connection works? I’ve heard there’s a dedicated Emirates zone, but how does it actually work in practice—I’ve got a 2-hour layover.
Thanks so much!
Take care.
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon.
I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport.
Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…).
AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly.
On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double!
In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others?
Given the price difference, I’m hesitant…
Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go?
Thanks,
HERVE
Hi everyone, I’ve unfortunately only just noticed that I booked two flight tickets, but I made a mistake on the second first name. Basically, my computer auto-filled and typed my first name twice, so both tickets are in my first name. Only the last names—mine and my friend’s—are correct.
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common).
I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows:
- Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes;
- A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late;
- Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens);
- Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight;
- If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation;
- The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason;
- In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/
Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed.
- Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps.
- Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation.
- If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/
- If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed.
- The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt.
- Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont.
- Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia.
Sincerely,
Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding.
Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage...
Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket.
On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata
On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto
I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer.
Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine.
I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket?
(It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania.
The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines.
So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers.
Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this.
Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops.
Do any of you have updates?
Thanks!
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG.
Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover?
We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker).
We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA.
For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai.
Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)?
We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one).
The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much!
I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul?
I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace.
It’s this model:
https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date."
See the photo.
Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?