California! Nevada! Utah! Oh!
FR

Translated into English.

DI Diamina Globetrotter ·
Hey Guillaume,

Nothing ventured, nothing gained. If it doesn’t cost anything, might as well give it a try.
VO VoyageForum Globetrotter ·
Hi Diamina,

Thanks for your reply.

Regarding a possible subscription model, many sites have tried, but it’s never enough. The conversion rate remains practically zero because people don’t want to pay for every site they use (understandable). Plus, it requires an automated billing system and a lot of programming around credit card payments (security), not to mention all the accounting involved and moderation issues ("I paid to access the site, so you can’t close my account..."). Honestly, I don’t believe in it. We’d maybe get a few thousand subscribers, but it really wouldn’t be enough to cover the site’s expenses.

That said, I feel like we’ll pull through... 🙂 just barely, but we’ll make it. We’re cutting costs everywhere we can (the photo limit per travel journal is part of that) and completely rethinking how to make the site profitable. Sometimes, a crisis forces you to come up with entirely new solutions. I won’t say more because our competitors are reading too... 😉 Back to coding... 🙂

Best regards,

François, administrator
DI Diamina Globetrotter ·
Good luck and all the best to you, François. 😄
MA Marati Globetrotter ·
Hi François, I just saw your reply (my previous message crossed with yours).

VoyageForum is one of the sites that applies the least compression to photos, to the point where it's practically imperceptible. Grab a 4K screen (or a tablet with a high-DPI resolution) and open/enlarge a beautiful photo from a travel journal by clicking on it. The photo that appears will have a resolution of 2,000 pixels wide (the photo file itself) to ensure maximum sharpness for the screen's resolution.

My mistake—it *did* seem that way when I viewed my photos, or others'. I wasn't the only one with that impression, but clearly, it was wrong. I apologize for that.

As for the financial issues, which are far more serious, I'm sorry that a fundraiser can't happen without financial or administrative hurdles. Even though more and more people "consume" the forum nonstop, jumping from one site to another without even taking the time to say thanks, others are attached to it and would be willing to contribute much more than 1 € 😕. Hang in there.
VO VoyageForum Globetrotter ·
Hi Guillaume,

My mistake—it really did seem that way when I looked at my photos or others. I wasn’t the only one with that impression, but clearly it was wrong.

For example, the photo on your profile is 377 KB on the site in 4K resolution (the highest we offer for this type of screen) when you click on it. But on your computer, the original photo must be between 3 and 5 MB—so 10 to 15 times larger. There’s necessarily a reduction in resolution and compression; it’d be crazy to display the original file on a website... However, this shouldn’t be noticeable at the same display size if you have a good screen (ideally a 4K one to see everything the site can offer in terms of photo quality) and, most importantly, if your browser or operating system isn’t automatically zooming in on the site’s pages (this zoom enlarges not just the text but also the photos without increasing their resolution... making them look blurrier). There’s also an option in your member profile: “Display site images at their maximum resolution/density”; it should be set to the “recommended” option (worth checking). Finally, the site can’t display better quality than the original photo... Some big-budget sites automatically tweak photos to fix contrast, color, or sharpness issues—something we don’t do on VoyageForum.

I’m a photography enthusiast, and I can assure you that VoyageForum meets the highest standards for displaying photos online (without altering the original photo, though). If you ever get the chance to see the site’s photos on a 4K screen (especially the enlarged version after clicking on them) and without browser zoom, you’ll understand what I mean. 🙂

Best regards,

François, administrator
BI Bibouns51 Globetrotter ·
Hi François, I just saw your reply (my previous message crossed with yours)

VoyageForum is one of the sites that applies the least compression to photos, to the point where it's practically imperceptible. Grab a 4K screen (or a tablet with a high-DPI resolution) and open/enlarge a beautiful photo from a travel journal by clicking on it. The photo that appears will have a resolution of 2000 pixels wide (the photo file itself) to ensure the sharpest possible display for your screen's resolution.

My mistake—it *did* seem that way when I viewed my photos, or others'. I wasn’t the only one with that impression, but clearly, it was wrong. I apologize for that.

As for the financial issues, which are far more serious, I’m sorry that a fundraiser can’t happen without financial or administrative hurdles. Even though more and more people "consume" the forum nonstop, jumping from one site to another without even taking the time to say thanks, others are attached to it and would be willing to contribute way more than 1 € 😕. Hang in there.

Totally agree with Guillaume! If a fundraiser can save VF, I’m in (given how much time I spend here...) !
VO VoyageForum Globetrotter ·
Totally agree with Guillaume! If a fundraiser can save VF, I'm in (given how much time I spend here...) !

Thanks Franck and everyone else for your support, encouragement, and willingness to help VF! It really touches us! 🙂

In a few weeks, we’ll come back to you with a proposal to help us out. 🙂 We won’t ask you to give us money directly, but to help us generate more, which would be ideal for VF’s long-term survival. I won’t say more for now. 🙂

Thanks again!! 🙂

François, administrator and founder
VA Valmichel86 Regular ·
Good evening; I’m coming back to VoyageForum’s decision to limit travel journals to 300 photos. I’m not contesting the decision itself, nor its economic reasons; however, I do regret how it was applied—specifically that it affects journals started before the effective date. From my perspective (as a member writing a journal), here’s how I see it: I chose a writing style that "interwove text and photos as much as possible." Let me explain with an example—day 26, which I wrote on March 8, so it’s still fresh in my mind: text, photo, text, photo, text, two photos, text, photo. I wanted to convey the feeling and atmosphere of being there: the vibe (wintery vs. spring-like) changes completely as you move from one lake to another, depending on the terrain, orientation, and wind. I know this style uses a lot of photos. If I’d known about the 300-photo limit, I would’ve thought: 33 days, so 9 photos per day. Keeping the daily itinerary post would leave me with 8 photos per day. I’d have realized I couldn’t stick with this style and would’ve had to find another approach. But to do that, I’d have needed to know the limit before starting the journal. So, I suggest that in the future, if constraints change, ongoing journals at the effective date shouldn’t be affected. Finally, I join others in hoping for improvements to VoyageForum’s situation.
DI Diamina Globetrotter ·
Hey François,

We’re waiting for your ideas so we can help VF.... Since upcoming trips might be a bit compromised, traveling through others’ travel journals and photos could be a great substitute. I’d hate to miss out on that! See you soon!
VO VoyageForum Globetrotter ·
Hi Michel,

I understand your frustration. However, we had to set a limit for all travel journals, past and future, because several older journals (some over a year old) kept receiving new photos, sometimes by the hundreds... Some members really went overboard... 😕 It’s also very difficult for us to determine whether a journal is truly finished or not to apply the limit.

That said, I’ve just increased the limit for your journal to 500 photos. For those in the same situation as you—meaning those who were in the process of writing their journal as of March 9—you can contact us by email using the “Contacts” link at the bottom of the site’s pages to make the request. However, we won’t go above 500 photos per journal.

Thanks for your understanding.

Best regards,

François, administrator
VO VoyageForum Globetrotter ·
Hi again Michel,

In the end, we went with something simpler: 500 photos for all the old travel journals and a maximum of 300 photos for new ones (from today onward).

Best regards,

François, administrator
BI Bibouns51 Globetrotter ·
Hi again Michel,

In the end, we went with something simpler: 500 photos for all the old travel journals and a maximum of 300 photos for new ones (starting today).

Best regards,

François, administrator

Great decision! I say that because I’m also working on a travel journal I’m about to finish, and I’d already gone over the 300-photo limit... See you, Franck
MU Muriel18 Globetrotter ·
Hi there

I’d missed this post earlier. Thanks for the explanations—they really help clear things up.

If I can help out sometime soon… 🙂 Muriel
TI Ticapi Globetrotter ·
Hi there,

I just saw all these messages about the photo restrictions. I totally get that we need to limit the number, but you inevitably take more photos on a 4-week trip than on a one-week stay.

I'm sorry to hear that VF isn't doing well. I hope the forum can overcome its problems and find solutions.

Quick question—some members are in the habit of inserting their own photos into other people's travel journals. Do these photos count toward the limit?

Have a great weekend. Carmen
VA Valmichel86 Regular ·
Hello again Michel,

In the end, we went with something simpler: 500 photos for all the old travel journals and a maximum of 300 photos for new ones (from today onward).

Best regards,

François, administrator

Thanks for taking my request into account. Some forum members (like me) will now be able to finish the travel journal they’d started.
VA Valmichel86 Regular ·
I'm picking up where I left off with Day 26: Friday, June 7.

The Mono Basin Visitor Center in Lee Vining has a commanding view over the lake. View of the northern part of the lake from the Visitor Center (the part behind the black cliffs is called "Blackpoint").



Mono Lake is part of the Great Basin, so it's a low point. It's famous for its "tufa towers," clay towers cemented together by freshwater springs bubbling up into the lake's salty, alkaline waters. These towers became visible when the lake level dropped: in 1941, tributaries feeding the lake were diverted to supply Los Angeles, and the level started to fall. I check out the northern part, Mono Lake County Park (3 km north of Lee Vining via US-395), where there's a small cluster of tufa towers that isn't the most interesting. Right after, I head to South Tufa Area—5 km south of Lee Vining, take Route 120, drive about 5 km, and you're there. At the start of the walk, there's a sign marking 6,392 feet ??? The locals weren’t happy to see the lake level drop: they mobilized, and in 1994, a decision was made to save the lake and raise its level (by stopping the diversion of tributaries). 6,392 feet is the target level for the lake—25 feet below the 1941 level, but it hasn’t been reached yet. So, you can walk along the shore and admire the tufa towers with the Sierra Nevada (west) in the background for some and the desert (east) for others.







When the target level is reached, these towers will be farther from the shore (others, dry today, will appear between the shore and these). Which parts will stay visible? The top, but how much? I didn’t find the lake’s current level in the visitor info, so it’s still a bit of a mystery to me.

After Mono Lake, Crowley Lake, lined with stone columns. I head south, leave the Great Basin, and return to the Owens River Valley. About 5 miles southwest of the Mammoth Lakes junction, Benton Crossing Road turns left, crosses the Owens River, heads south, and approaches Crowley Lake. Suddenly, it turns due east and moves away from the lake. I count 2 miles, and on the right, a track (03S151A) branches off and runs alongside the road for half a mile. From this section, the track (03S151) leads to the edge of Crowley Lake. Unfortunately, the sedan’s undercarriage scrapes the ground within the first few meters—I decide not to go any farther (I think a 4x4 is necessary). Plus, it’s too late to hike the 2.5 miles to the lake’s beach, explore the site, and return. I’m disappointed—I got the detailed info this morning in Mammoth Lakes. If I’d known the track wasn’t sedan-friendly, I could’ve visited Crowley Lake first on foot and then gone to South Tufa Area with a bit less leisurely pacing. I can’t come back tomorrow because the improvised part of my trip is over—I need to be in Yosemite (reservation) tomorrow evening. There’s also the fact that I’m writing in feet and miles now—I won’t do that again. Hill Top Hot Springs will replace Crowley Lake. These hot springs are located near Benton Crossing Road, just under 5 km from the US-395 junction. At the foot of a hill, a short track leads to a small parking lot (200 meters from the road). On foot, via a wooden boardwalk, I reach the pool—a big bathtub for about 6 people. Four Californians are already there, sipping cans. They make room for me, and I end up staying for an hour, chatting. "Driving around the area, finding a hot springs site, and spending the day in the hot water gazing at the Sierra"—that’s the Californian *dolce far niente*. Leaving the hot springs, I head back to the foot of the mountain to see one last lake nestled in a valley: Convict Lake. The setting is wild—the other end of the lake, accessible on foot (1.5 km away), is right below Laurel Mountain’s cliffs. The lake is at 7,546 feet, the temperature is cool, and it’s windy.



Back at Crowley Lake BLM Campground. The sun is setting, the campground is already in the mountain’s shadow, but Crowley Lake isn’t yet.

SW Swimmer Veteran ·
Hey Michel, glad you can continue your trip report! 🙂
VA Valmichel86 Regular ·
Day 27: Saturday, June 8 (Lake Crowley - Summerdale Campground )

Crossing the Sierra and diving into the furnace.

Route.



Departure at 7:10 AM (earlier than usual) because there’s a lot of road ahead. Bright sunshine and a cool temperature that will drop even more at the small pass between Mammoth Lakes and Lee Vining (only 2°C). I have breakfast at "Lee Vining Solar Project," a well-equipped picnic area with green spaces (I picnicked there yesterday; there was a school gathering with meals, outdoor games, and sports, including soccer—mostly girls). Twenty kilometers past Bridgeport, I turn left onto Route 108 toward "Sonora Pass" and Sonora. Yes! I didn’t mention it earlier. The direct route via "Tioga Pass" is closed (it won’t open until July 1, 2019). So I have to take a long detour to the north and cross "Sonora Pass" (2,935 meters), which opened on May 30. The climb to the pass starts at 2,200 meters in a pine forest; snow appears on the ground and becomes more and more present as I approach the pass. The mountain is accessible, and the pass is wide open (no steep walls or drop-offs). Ski tourers and snowshoers have parked their vehicles all over and set off into the area (3°C, June sunshine, not a breath of wind).



The western slope is steeper; the road descends to "Stanislaus River," crosses it, then stays along the mountainside. The river plunges into a gorge where a dam was built, creating "Donnell Lake."



Then it’s a long... long drive to Sonora. The temperature rises until it becomes stifling (what a contrast in the same day! The descent takes you from 2,900 meters to about 500 meters). This entire landscape of hills (Sonora, Jamestown, Moccasin) is scorching, even if "Lake Don Pedro" looks refreshing.



Meanwhile... the snow is melting in the Sierra.

Yosemite is still far away; hills, plateaus, rivers, a few villages (Groveland, Buck Meadows), and the scenery gradually shifts from yellow tones to green. And here’s "Big Oak Flat Entrance": three toll booths on a fairly wide road in a forested setting that might remind you of the Jura (on a scorching day) if you don’t look too closely at the conifer species, which must be different. I receive the "National Park Service" tourist brochure and a newspaper, "Yosemite Guide," published monthly on real newsprint (20 pages, May 15 - June 18). After the "Tioga Road" intersection, on a winding stretch, I realize I’ve arrived in Yosemite.



I recognize "Half Dome" and "El Capitan"; the road descends, crosses the bridge over the river, and is lined by a pedestrian trail following the valley floor. The banks of the trail are submerged by the flow of the "Merced River," which is overflowing generously. In this area, as soon as you step out from under the trees, "El Capitan" dominates the space.



I don’t venture deeper into the valley and stop at one of the few available spots in the "Bridalveil Fall" parking lot. An easy trail leads to the waterfall.



How tempting it is to get closer! However, the ground is already damp at the end of the parking lot and becomes muddy on the unpaved sections. The stream flowing from the waterfall to the river is carrying a lot of water. But when you look up, you see... or rather, you don’t see anything. Should I post a photo that shows this? Probably not. A cloud of droplets obscures the sky, the waterfall, and all the rocks except those in the foreground. The density of the droplets is such that, in addition to not seeing anything, I’m quickly soaked, which is rather pleasant given the temperature. Next, I go to "Tunnel View." "El Capitan" on the left, "Bridalveil Fall" on the right, "Yosemite Valley" in the middle: an iconic photo of the park.



I’ll come back tomorrow; for now, I cross the tunnel, drive the full length of "Wawona Road," and just after exiting the park, arrive at "Summerdale Campground," where I’ve reserved a spot for two nights.

How did I end up at this campground? Here’s the story—it might be useful. I had planned to book at one of the park’s campgrounds near "Half Dome Village." Reservations opened on January 15 or 16 at 3 PM (French time). I logged in at the scheduled time; since I’d already booked at Zion NP, my account was already set up on the site. When I tried to finalize the reservation, the site told me that the phone number on my account (my mobile number) was invalid . It wanted a valid U.S. number (and not just any random one; I tried). I didn’t have one on me. Failure. I logged back in the next day; I had to go to "Summerdale Campground" to find an available spot.
VA Valmichel86 Regular ·
Hi Monique, Thanks (better late than never) for your message. "Death Valley" is definitely a park where you need to do more than just drive through. From what I saw, my top pick is the "Golden Canyon + Badlands Loop" hikes.
MA Marati Globetrotter ·
El Capitan takes on a whole new dimension once you've seen Alex Honnold's incredible feat in *Free Solo*. Ever since I watched that documentary, which follows his mind-blowing (or reckless?) free solo ascent, I get chills every time I see a new photo of this monument!

Similar discussions

You might also like