Air France: moins d’A380 vers Montréal cet été
by Iban323
This discussion is in French, the community’s main language.
Original post
La compagnie aérienne Air France va diminuer à quatre par semaine le nombre de rotations entre Paris et Montréal opérées en Airbus A380.
A partir du 5 juin 2012, le superjumbo de la compagnie nationale française ne se rendra plus que quatre fois par semaine au Canada au lieu de sept actuellement. Seuls les vols du lundi, jeudi, samedi et dimanche (départ 13h30 pour arriver à 15h00, retour à 19h55 pour arriver le lendemain à 8h35) seront alors opérés en A380, les autres jours retrouvant un Boeing 777-300ER. Air France proposera en été 20 vols hebdomadaires, soit trois vols par jour sauf le dimanche (le premier en 777-300ER avec départ de CDG à 10h30 et retour à 17h30, le dernier en 777-200ER à 19h15 avec retour à 23h00).
La compagnie de l’alliance SkyTeam fait face sur la route de Montréal à la concurrence d’Air Canada, Air Transat, Sunwing Airlines, et Corsairfly en haute saison.
Rappelons que les six A380 d’Air France sont désormais configurés pour accueillir 516 passagers, dont 9 en première, 80 en affaires, 38 en premium et 389 en économie. Depuis le 12 décembre 2011, la classe Premium Voyageur est disponible sur la quasi-totalité du réseau long-courrier d’Air France, soit 67 destinations desservies en777 (sauf sur certaines routes), Airbus A330, A340ouA380.
Source :http://www.air-journal.fr/2012-01-06-air-france-moins-da380-vers-montreal-cet-ete-542284.html
Dommage de plus aucune raison n'est indiquée ...
Qu'un transporteur qu'il soit aérien, routier ou fluvial attribue tel ou tel appareil au flux du trafic, il n'y a riel d'anormal. Cela se fait dans tous les types de transport, si il y a moins de passagers ou plus de concurrence, l'A380 n'est plus indispensable donc AF s'adapte.
C'est la même chose pour le métro ou les bus de la RATP, plus de monde plus de métro ou bus, moins de monde moins de véhicules en circulation, on ne vas pas promener des banquettes vides pour le plaisir. C'est un question de bonne gestion du parc.
C'est la même chose pour le métro ou les bus de la RATP, plus de monde plus de métro ou bus, moins de monde moins de véhicules en circulation, on ne vas pas promener des banquettes vides pour le plaisir. C'est un question de bonne gestion du parc.
Les conseils, c'est comme l'argent, on n'en a jamais assez.....
Egalement sur CDG <> YUL, Air Canada va augmenter sa capacité par rapport à l'an passé, le premier vol restant en 777-300ER (tout comme au S10, au lieu de 767-300 au S11) et le deuxième vol restant en 767-300. Et également un 777-300ER sur CDG <> YUL.
Par contre d'autres escale européenes d'AC voient leur capacité diminuer: BRU en 767 au lieu de 333 au S11, MUC en 333 au lieu de 77W.
La concurrence à coup sur alors .
Pas mal de compagnies aériennes sur cette ligne l'été ...
Les passagers se repartissent donc entre toutes ces compagnies
Pas mal de compagnies aériennes sur cette ligne l'été ...
Les passagers se repartissent donc entre toutes ces compagnies
La concurrence à coup sur alors .
Pas mal de compagnies aériennes sur cette ligne l'été ...
Les passagers se repartissent donc entre toutes ces compagnies
Air France a réduit la voilure sur CDG-YUL à cause de la concurrence sur la saison estivale : Air Transat, Air Canada, Corsairfly et Sunwing Airlines.
Pas mal de compagnies aériennes sur cette ligne l'été ...
Les passagers se repartissent donc entre toutes ces compagnies
Air France a réduit la voilure sur CDG-YUL à cause de la concurrence sur la saison estivale : Air Transat, Air Canada, Corsairfly et Sunwing Airlines.
Tout ce qui ne vous tue pas peut faire l'objet d'un ACARS
... Air France a réduit la voilure sur CDG-YUL à cause de la concurrence sur la saison estivale : Air Transat, Air Canada, Corsairfly et Sunwing Airlines.
Sunwing ne devrait pas reprendre les vols depuis Montreal** mais se recentrer uniquement sur Toronto ! ... et ça reste a confirmer
* * Offre les vols CorsairFly sur son site resa !
Sunwing ne devrait pas reprendre les vols depuis Montreal** mais se recentrer uniquement sur Toronto ! ... et ça reste a confirmer
* * Offre les vols CorsairFly sur son site resa !
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Air France a réduit la voilure sur CDG-YUL à cause de la concurrence sur la saison estivale : Air Transat, Air Canada, Corsairfly et Sunwing Airlines.
Pour ma part j'ai pris AIR TRANSAT (vols en juin). En effet si j'avais prévu initiallement de prendre CORSAIRFLY, car elle part d'Orly ce qui est beaucoup plus pratique pour moi, mais leur changement de politique bagages me pénalisait trop (j'aurai 2 bagages dont 1 vélo). De plus AIR TRANSAT permet d'arriver à Montréal et repartir de Québec pour un prix compétitif (520 euros TTC avec 1 bagage de 25kgs + 2X23 euros pour le vélo) et comme je fais un circuit c'est intéressant de ne pas perdre de temps à revenir au point de départ (de plus le train n'est pas donné ... ce qui annule la différence de prix / prix Paris Montréal A/R).
Pour ma part j'ai pris AIR TRANSAT (vols en juin). En effet si j'avais prévu initiallement de prendre CORSAIRFLY, car elle part d'Orly ce qui est beaucoup plus pratique pour moi, mais leur changement de politique bagages me pénalisait trop (j'aurai 2 bagages dont 1 vélo). De plus AIR TRANSAT permet d'arriver à Montréal et repartir de Québec pour un prix compétitif (520 euros TTC avec 1 bagage de 25kgs + 2X23 euros pour le vélo) et comme je fais un circuit c'est intéressant de ne pas perdre de temps à revenir au point de départ (de plus le train n'est pas donné ... ce qui annule la différence de prix / prix Paris Montréal A/R).
AC doit être rentable entre CDG et YUL surtout ils envoyent un 77W et un 763 l'été prochain mais AF est en train de réduire l'Airbus a 380 sur YUL cela peut vouloir dire que la démande diminue de plus en plus au sein d'AF et aussi j'ai vu qu'AC est toujours moins chèr qu'AF pour YUL-CDG-YUL.
Les créneaux pour les 388 d'AF pour cet été sont: PVG, LAX, IAD, JFK, NRT, YUL et JNB.
AC doit être rentable entre CDG et YUL surtout ils envoyent un 77W et un 763 l'été prochain mais AF est en train de réduire l'Airbus a 380 sur YUL cela peut vouloir dire que la démande diminue de plus en plus au sein d'AF et aussi j'ai vu qu'AC est toujours moins chèr qu'AF pour YUL-CDG-YUL.
Entre S11 et S12 il y aura beaucoup de changement chez AC cet été sur le transatlantique. Quelques exemples : MUC passera en 333 (S12) au lieu de 77W (S11), BRU restera en 767 (S12) au lieu de 333 (S11), LHR (depuis YUL) passera de 2x767 (S11) à 1x333 (S12) mais de l'autre coté passe à 5 vols quotidiens depuis YYZ (le 5e vol en 767), sans parler de YYC FRA qui est upgradé en 333 (du principalement au départ de LH de cette ligne) Paris est une rare destination a avoir une augmentation de capacité, mais c'est simplement un retour à la situation de S10 (à cette époque le 767 partait le matin et était prolongé/avancé à YVR).
Pour ce qui est de votre analyse, les marchés sont différents: - Pour AC le vol sert à transporter les passagers au Canada (voir aux USA) via YUL. Pas de correspondance pour AC à CDG, celles ci passant principalement via FRA (avec des vols de YYC, YYZ, YOW, YUL + YVR by LH) voir MUC. - Pour AF les vols servent à transporter les passagers ailleurs en europe, voir en afrique, moyen orient, asie via le hub parisien. Il serait interessant de voir si AF ne souffre pas non plus de l'arrivée de QR à YUL dont la capacité passe d'un 77L à un 77W. Peut etre un peu de correspondances à YUL grâce aux accords avec Westjet. - Je serai curieux de voir la répartition de la clientele uniquement CDG YUL (c'est à dire sans correspondance). TS et CRL voir WG ne prennent ils pas une tres grande partie du trafic?
Entre S11 et S12 il y aura beaucoup de changement chez AC cet été sur le transatlantique. Quelques exemples : MUC passera en 333 (S12) au lieu de 77W (S11), BRU restera en 767 (S12) au lieu de 333 (S11), LHR (depuis YUL) passera de 2x767 (S11) à 1x333 (S12) mais de l'autre coté passe à 5 vols quotidiens depuis YYZ (le 5e vol en 767), sans parler de YYC FRA qui est upgradé en 333 (du principalement au départ de LH de cette ligne) Paris est une rare destination a avoir une augmentation de capacité, mais c'est simplement un retour à la situation de S10 (à cette époque le 767 partait le matin et était prolongé/avancé à YVR).
Pour ce qui est de votre analyse, les marchés sont différents: - Pour AC le vol sert à transporter les passagers au Canada (voir aux USA) via YUL. Pas de correspondance pour AC à CDG, celles ci passant principalement via FRA (avec des vols de YYC, YYZ, YOW, YUL + YVR by LH) voir MUC. - Pour AF les vols servent à transporter les passagers ailleurs en europe, voir en afrique, moyen orient, asie via le hub parisien. Il serait interessant de voir si AF ne souffre pas non plus de l'arrivée de QR à YUL dont la capacité passe d'un 77L à un 77W. Peut etre un peu de correspondances à YUL grâce aux accords avec Westjet. - Je serai curieux de voir la répartition de la clientele uniquement CDG YUL (c'est à dire sans correspondance). TS et CRL voir WG ne prennent ils pas une tres grande partie du trafic?
On ma dit que la majorité des passagers qui utilient AF entre YUL et CDG sont des passagers en correspondance. Mais aussi il faux dire qu'AF est la compagnie la plus chère entre YUL et CDG c'est bien qu'ils utilisent l'Airbus a 380 sur YUL tous les jours. De plus un de mes amis de youtube don't le nom d'utilisateur YULspotter ma dit qu'AF va déployer l'Airbus a 380 sur d'autres destination comme LAX et PVG en réduisant les fréquences sur YUL. Je vois que vous avez parlé de LHR ça je le sais pour AC mais pour YUL-LHR je m'attendais à un 744 de la part de BA en raison des jeux olympiques. Mais si AC va mettre 5 vols quotidiens sur YYZ-LHR ça doit être en raison des jeux olympiques de Londres. Aussi AF ne soufre pas de QR sur YUL ça doit être aussi en raison des prix comme par exemple pour un YUL-CDG-BOM qui coûte 1650$ avec QR et 1050$ avec AF. Mais en général AF est moins chèr que QR pour l'Inde et la Thailande depuis YUL. De plus je pense qu'AC va mettre le Boeing 787 Dreamliner sur YUL-CDG-YUL puisqu'en 2014 AC prendra la livraison de son premier Boeing 787 et ça sera aussi le 60e aniversaire de la présence d'AC en France.
Sur IAD-CDG, il doit présentement avoir 4 rotations hébdomadaires en 388 et pour le reste il y a 3 rotations hébdomadaires en 77W et une rotation quotidienne en 332. Mais cet été IAD aura une rotation quotidienne en 388 mais je ne sais pas ça sera quoi après. Je sais qu'à compter du 28 mai prochain, AF enverra un 388 à LAX sur une rotation quotidienne et aussi il y aura PVG comme destination de 388 d'AF.
Petit changement dans le programme :
Au lieu du jeudi, l'A380 sera déployé le mercredi.
Pas d'autres changements donc :
Paris Montréal : LUNDI MERCREDI SAMEDI DIMANCHE 13H30 Montréal Paris : LUNDI MERCREDI SAMEDI DIMANCHE 19H55
Au lieu du jeudi, l'A380 sera déployé le mercredi.
Pas d'autres changements donc :
Paris Montréal : LUNDI MERCREDI SAMEDI DIMANCHE 13H30 Montréal Paris : LUNDI MERCREDI SAMEDI DIMANCHE 19H55
J'espère que l'Airbus a 380 ne laissera pas la place à un calis de 747 comme l'automne dernier mais aussi entre Paris et Montréal le mardi, jeudi et vendredi, sur le vol AF 342/344 il y aura un Boeing 777-300ER en version internationale de 303 passagers. Pour le reste ça sera un Boeing 777-300ER en version COI du lundi au samedi et aussi il y aura un Boeing 777-200 tous les jours. Moi je trouve qu'Air France doit garder son Airbus a 380 sur YUL 7 jours 7 comme c'est le cas présentement. De plus je pense que cet hiver l'Airbus a 380 d'Air France desservira Montréal 4 fois par semaine aussi on ne sais jamais. De plus je veux que l'Airbus a 380 reste à Montréal en 2013 sinon je vais capoter.
... Moi je trouve qu'Air France doit garder son Airbus a 380 sur YUL 7 jours 7 comme c'est le cas présentement. De plus je pense que cet hiver l'Airbus a 380 d'Air France desservira Montréal 4 fois par semaine aussi on ne sais jamais. De plus je veux que l'Airbus a 380 reste à Montréal en 2013 sinon je vais capoter.
Pour le moment AF doit deployer les A380 ou il y a des passagers ! ... sur YUL la demande estivale est importante en Eco et l'offre aussi (Air Transat et Corsair sont tres presents a cette période) et le A380 n'offre qu'une 20aine de sieges Eco en plus qu'un B777-300ER version COI, donc interet pour AF de le postionner autre part ou il y a plus de demande en sieges business ! (80 sieges business sur un A380 et seulement 14 sur un B777-300 ER COI)
Le jour ou AF aura une flotte importante de A380, peut etre que la situation changera mais ce n'est pas une certitude, c'est fonction du marché ! et puis pour moi le A380 bof ... super pendant le vol, rien a redire mais un peu moins ma tasse de thé avant et apres, ... jaimerais bien savoir comment ça se passe a YUL vu le cirque lorsque 3 ou 4 vols arrivent d'Europe en mm temps !
Pour le moment AF doit deployer les A380 ou il y a des passagers ! ... sur YUL la demande estivale est importante en Eco et l'offre aussi (Air Transat et Corsair sont tres presents a cette période) et le A380 n'offre qu'une 20aine de sieges Eco en plus qu'un B777-300ER version COI, donc interet pour AF de le postionner autre part ou il y a plus de demande en sieges business ! (80 sieges business sur un A380 et seulement 14 sur un B777-300 ER COI)
Le jour ou AF aura une flotte importante de A380, peut etre que la situation changera mais ce n'est pas une certitude, c'est fonction du marché ! et puis pour moi le A380 bof ... super pendant le vol, rien a redire mais un peu moins ma tasse de thé avant et apres, ... jaimerais bien savoir comment ça se passe a YUL vu le cirque lorsque 3 ou 4 vols arrivent d'Europe en mm temps !
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
C'est à compter du 5 juin qu'on verra un Airbus a 380 4 fois par semaine sur YUL sera t'il rentable il le faux mais aussi il ne faux pas oublier que la majorité des pax de l'Airbus a 380 en partance de YUL sont des pax en correspondance. Aussi ce n'est pas impossible qu'AF utilise l'Airbus a 380 4 fois par semaine sur YUL avec le prochain horraire d'hiver nordique. Aussi les journées où l'Airbus a 380 désservira YUL à compter du 5 juin sont maitenant lundi, mercredi, samedi et dimanche.
A l’été 2012, ce sont sept destinations qui seront desservies par Air France en A380 :
New York JFK, 6 jours par semaine Washington DC, 7 jours par semaine Los Angeles, 7 jours par semaine Montréal, 4 jours par semaine Johannesburg, Tokyo-Narita, Singapour, 3 jours par semaine
Avec 6 A380 pour le moment et 2 prévus d'ici cet été chaque destination aura donc son A380.
New York JFK, 6 jours par semaine Washington DC, 7 jours par semaine Los Angeles, 7 jours par semaine Montréal, 4 jours par semaine Johannesburg, Tokyo-Narita, Singapour, 3 jours par semaine
Avec 6 A380 pour le moment et 2 prévus d'ici cet été chaque destination aura donc son A380.
A l’été 2012, ce sont sept destinations qui seront desservies par Air France en A380 :
New York JFK, Washington DC, Los Angeles, Montréal, Johannesburg, Tokyo-Narita et Singapour.
Avec pour l'instant seulement 6 A380 dans sa flotte pour 7 destinations prévues cet été, il est donc logique que les appareils ne puissent être utilisés sur toutes les lignes 7 jours sur 7.
2 A380 supplémentaires doivent normalement rejoindre la flotte air france juste avant l'été.
Je serai surpris que IAD reste parmi les destinations desservies en 388 vu les taux de remplissage extrêmement faibles. De même pour YUL, le 77W COI semble plus rentable pour AF.
JNB/JFK/DXB sont par contre des routes excellentes niveau remplissage.
New York JFK, Washington DC, Los Angeles, Montréal, Johannesburg, Tokyo-Narita et Singapour.
Avec pour l'instant seulement 6 A380 dans sa flotte pour 7 destinations prévues cet été, il est donc logique que les appareils ne puissent être utilisés sur toutes les lignes 7 jours sur 7.
2 A380 supplémentaires doivent normalement rejoindre la flotte air france juste avant l'été.
Je serai surpris que IAD reste parmi les destinations desservies en 388 vu les taux de remplissage extrêmement faibles. De même pour YUL, le 77W COI semble plus rentable pour AF.
JNB/JFK/DXB sont par contre des routes excellentes niveau remplissage.
Tout ce qui ne vous tue pas peut faire l'objet d'un ACARS
Pour l'été 2012, Air France ira à Singapour en Boeing 777-300ER tous les jours et en Boeing 777-200 trois fois par semaine. Mais comment savez vous qu'Air France enverra un Airbus a 380 à Singapour.
Il est confirmé par communiqué de presse que le A380 partira à Singapour 3 fois par semaine à partir du mois de juin.
Mais au vu de la durée du trajet en fait le A380 est utilisé toute la semaine sauf le jeudi.
Mais au vu de la durée du trajet en fait le A380 est utilisé toute la semaine sauf le jeudi.
Pour le moment IAD reste prévu et en plus 7 jours sur 7 ...
D'accord donnez moi cette source. Aussi entre Paris et Singapour il y a l'Airbus a 380 de Singapore Airlines tous les jours.
Il suffit d'aller sur le site de Air France Corporate ...
http://corporate.airfrance.com/fr/presse/actualites/article/item/singapour-septieme-destination-de-lete-pour-la380-dair-france/
http://corporate.airfrance.com/fr/presse/actualites/article/item/singapour-septieme-destination-de-lete-pour-la380-dair-france/
C'est possible mais avant d'aller à IAD en Airbus a 380 AF effectuer une liaison bi quotidienne en 772 sur IAD. Sur YUL c'était une liaison quotidienne en 744 et tous les jours sauf le mercredi en 77W.
D'après le dernier communiqué de presse,
Air France recevra deux nouveaux A380 dès le mois de avril portant le total de sa flotte à 8 appareils.
Aucun problème pour gérer les 7 destinations de l'été donc.
Air France recevra deux nouveaux A380 dès le mois de avril portant le total de sa flotte à 8 appareils.
Aucun problème pour gérer les 7 destinations de l'été donc.
Oui mais pourquoi YUL perd 3 rotations de 388 l'été prochain ça doit être en raison de la demande. Je pense aussi qu'AF ira à YUL en 388 l'hiver prochain 4 fois par semaine aussi.
Oui c'est en raison de la demande.
C'est clairement dommage pour les passagers car l'appareil ne sera de toute façon pas utilisé sur une autre ligne et restera donc à Paris.
Mais c'est logique si l'avion n'est pas plein.
C'est clairement dommage pour les passagers car l'appareil ne sera de toute façon pas utilisé sur une autre ligne et restera donc à Paris.
Mais c'est logique si l'avion n'est pas plein.
C'est possible puiqu'Air Transat pique des passagers à AF et ils ont des calis d'A310. J'ai même posté une vidéo où je dit success à AF-KL. Cette vidéo se trouve au http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEuk5K86VXo.
À fuir absolument malgré le A380!
Lire mon aventure de l'été passé pour avoir plus de détails.
Imaginez que j'ai eu 10,500 points Flying Blue comme dédommagement mais comment les utiliser?
Ridicule.
Dommage....
"😠😠"
Lire mon aventure de l'été passé pour avoir plus de détails.
Imaginez que j'ai eu 10,500 points Flying Blue comme dédommagement mais comment les utiliser?
Ridicule.
Dommage....
"😠😠"
"Plus il y a de fous, moins il y a de riz"
Paris, Bordeaux, Bourgogne, Rhône, Alpes, Provence, Languedoc-Roussillon, Barcelona, Figueres, Belém, Sao Paulo, Manaus, Marajò, Soure, Joanes, Ilha de Mosqueiro, Cambu, Iccoraci, Costa Rica, Corse, México, Cuba, Thaïlande, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodge, Chine...
Chaque cas est différent et on ne peut dire à des gens de fuir Air France car vous avez eu une mauvaise expérience avec eux ...
Pour la majorité des clients , cela se passe très bien.
Pour la majorité des clients , cela se passe très bien.
Chaque cas est différent et on ne peut dire à des gens de fuir Air France car vous avez eu une mauvaise expérience avec eux ...
Pour la majorité des clients , cela se passe très bien.
On peut dire ce qu'on veut. Les gens ne sont pas obligés de nous écouter. On appelle ça la liberté d'expression.
"😉😉"
Pour la majorité des clients , cela se passe très bien.
On peut dire ce qu'on veut. Les gens ne sont pas obligés de nous écouter. On appelle ça la liberté d'expression.
"😉😉"
"Plus il y a de fous, moins il y a de riz"
Paris, Bordeaux, Bourgogne, Rhône, Alpes, Provence, Languedoc-Roussillon, Barcelona, Figueres, Belém, Sao Paulo, Manaus, Marajò, Soure, Joanes, Ilha de Mosqueiro, Cambu, Iccoraci, Costa Rica, Corse, México, Cuba, Thaïlande, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodge, Chine...
Pour la majorité des clients , cela se passe très bien.
Comme vous dites.
Cela n'est pas bien grave , allez..
Comme vous dites.
Cela n'est pas bien grave , allez..
AC doit être rentable entre CDG et YUL surtout ils envoyent un 77W et un 763 l'été prochain mais AF est en train de réduire l'Airbus a 380 sur YUL cela peut vouloir dire que la démande diminue de plus en plus au sein d'AF et aussi j'ai vu qu'AC est toujours moins chèr qu'AF pour YUL-CDG-YUL.
En tout cas je pars le 2 mai sur YUL et l'avion est quasi complet en Y ( il reste une dizaine de place en sièges + ). En revanche à cette date la période semble peu propice au voyage d'affaires avec une cabine J quasi vide. Alors si l'on considère que la rentabilité du vol tient au remplissage de la cabine avant je ne sais pas ce que gagne réellement AF sur un A380 complet en Y mais à 50% en Y+, moins de 20% en J et 0% en P .... Pour autant j'ai fais un YYZ-CDG en J sur AC l'été dernier en plein mois d'aout et la cabine était aussi quasiment vide alors qu'à priori très remplie en Y ( pour info ma destination finale était YVR et à l'époque les billets n'étaient pas moins chers que sur AF qui exploitait via KLM )
En tout cas je pars le 2 mai sur YUL et l'avion est quasi complet en Y ( il reste une dizaine de place en sièges + ). En revanche à cette date la période semble peu propice au voyage d'affaires avec une cabine J quasi vide. Alors si l'on considère que la rentabilité du vol tient au remplissage de la cabine avant je ne sais pas ce que gagne réellement AF sur un A380 complet en Y mais à 50% en Y+, moins de 20% en J et 0% en P .... Pour autant j'ai fais un YYZ-CDG en J sur AC l'été dernier en plein mois d'aout et la cabine était aussi quasiment vide alors qu'à priori très remplie en Y ( pour info ma destination finale était YVR et à l'époque les billets n'étaient pas moins chers que sur AF qui exploitait via KLM )
Le 2 mai prochain pour YUL, est-ce-que vous voyagez avec AF en Airbus a 380?
OUI ( enfin si il n'y a pas de changement d'appareil d'ici là 😉 )
OUI ( enfin si il n'y a pas de changement d'appareil d'ici là 😉 )
J'osais pas l'écrire...
Vu que ça n'arrive qu'à moi. 😉
Poil aux bras!
"😎😎"
J'osais pas l'écrire...
Vu que ça n'arrive qu'à moi. 😉
Poil aux bras!
"😎😎"
"Plus il y a de fous, moins il y a de riz"
Paris, Bordeaux, Bourgogne, Rhône, Alpes, Provence, Languedoc-Roussillon, Barcelona, Figueres, Belém, Sao Paulo, Manaus, Marajò, Soure, Joanes, Ilha de Mosqueiro, Cambu, Iccoraci, Costa Rica, Corse, México, Cuba, Thaïlande, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodge, Chine...
Tant que je ne suis pas assis sur le siège que j'avais réservé, je me dis que tout peut encore arriver ( et encore, mieux vaut être au roulage pour se dire que çà va plus changer 😛 )
Tant que je ne suis pas assis sur le siège que j'avais réservé, je me dis que tout peut encore arriver ( et encore, mieux vaut être au roulage pour se dire que çà va plus changer 😛 )
Même au roulage, on peut encore se faire rouler.
Imaginez!
"😏😏"
Même au roulage, on peut encore se faire rouler.
Imaginez!
"😏😏"
"Plus il y a de fous, moins il y a de riz"
Paris, Bordeaux, Bourgogne, Rhône, Alpes, Provence, Languedoc-Roussillon, Barcelona, Figueres, Belém, Sao Paulo, Manaus, Marajò, Soure, Joanes, Ilha de Mosqueiro, Cambu, Iccoraci, Costa Rica, Corse, México, Cuba, Thaïlande, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodge, Chine...
Très bon choix mais à la dernière minute un changement d'appareil peut survenir et ça déjà été le cas entre CDG et JFK où un Boeing 777-300ER a prit place d'un Airbus a 380.
Petit rappel du programme A380 vers Montréal chez Air France :
Jusqu'au 3 juin inclus :
- 2 vols quotidiens : 10H30 ou 13H30. - Tous les jours le vol de 13H30 (AF344) est assuré en A380.
A partir du 04 juin :
- 3 vols par jour du lundi au samedi : 10H30 ou 13H30 ou 19H15 - 2 vols le dimanche : 13H30 ou 19H15 - Le lundi, mercredi, samedi et dimanche le vol de 13H30 (AF344) est assuré en A380. - Les mardi, jeudi et vendredi le vol AF344 est assuré en B777-300
Jusqu'au 3 juin inclus :
- 2 vols quotidiens : 10H30 ou 13H30. - Tous les jours le vol de 13H30 (AF344) est assuré en A380.
A partir du 04 juin :
- 3 vols par jour du lundi au samedi : 10H30 ou 13H30 ou 19H15 - 2 vols le dimanche : 13H30 ou 19H15 - Le lundi, mercredi, samedi et dimanche le vol de 13H30 (AF344) est assuré en A380. - Les mardi, jeudi et vendredi le vol AF344 est assuré en B777-300
C'est en plein ça et je pense que l'Airbus a 380 désservira YUL 4 fois par semaine jusqu'au 27 octobre dâte de la fin de l'horraire d'été. J'ai entendu dire que le vol AF 348/349 va cesser ses opérations au début du mois d'octobre au lieu de 27 comme prévu. Mais moi je pense que l'hiver prochain l'Airbus a 380 continuera de désservir Montréal 4 fois par semaine.
Sachant que Air France va recevoir 2 nouveaux A380 d'ici cet été je pense également que le vol AF344 restera effectué en A380 cette hiver.
Après tous les jours ou seulement 4 par semaine ? On verra bien
Après tous les jours ou seulement 4 par semaine ? On verra bien
Tout ce que je souhaite c'est qu'AF garde ses rotations en Airbus a380 sur YUL toute l'année est pas en été seulement. Mais malgré qu'AF a prolongé ses 744 jusqu'en 2016, ça ne veut pas dire que les 744 d'AF irront à YUL. De plus le meilleur produit entre YUL et CDG ça doit être AF suivi de AC et TS.
Selon le site officiel des aéroports de Paris,
Les vols AF344 et AF347 de hier et de aujourd'hui se sont fait en Boeing 777-300 au lieu de l'A380 !
Les vols AF344 et AF347 de hier et de aujourd'hui se sont fait en Boeing 777-300 au lieu de l'A380 !
C'est possible surtout en raison des problèmes techniques sur des Airbus a 380 mais est-ce-que quelqu'un sait pourquoi il n'y a pas d'Airbus a 380 sur YUL aujourd'hui?
C'est possible surtout en raison des problèmes techniques sur des Airbus a 380 mais est-ce-que quelqu'un sait pourquoi il n'y a pas d'Airbus a 380 sur YUL aujourd'hui?
Quels problèmes techniques ??? Il y a une demande Airbus / AESA de verifier certains points structurels suite a la decouverte de criiques sur de smachines mais ça ne genère pas des chgt d'appareils inopinés , c'est programmé a l'avance , Emirates a repris son programme A380 pour prendre en compte ces controles plusieurs semaines a l'avance !
... alors peut etre faut il se poser des questions sur les remplissages !
Quels problèmes techniques ??? Il y a une demande Airbus / AESA de verifier certains points structurels suite a la decouverte de criiques sur de smachines mais ça ne genère pas des chgt d'appareils inopinés , c'est programmé a l'avance , Emirates a repris son programme A380 pour prendre en compte ces controles plusieurs semaines a l'avance !
... alors peut etre faut il se poser des questions sur les remplissages !
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Hier Air France a envoyé 2 fois un Boeing 777-300ER à YUL au lieu d'une et il y a eu un Boeing 777-300ER d'Air France hier sur le vol AF342/345 immatricullation F-GZNO et sur le vol AF344/345 immatriculation F-GSQA et aujourd'hui le F-GZNO est en route vers YUL sur le vol AF342 mais avant hier c'était un Airbus a 340-300.
Log in first, then come back to this page.
You might also like
Trois semaines entre Montréal, Ottawa, New York et la Nouvelle AngleterreFR
Visite de Montréal, la ville souterraineFR
De Toronto à Montréal, en passant par la GaspésieFR
Un séjour camping-car de Montréal à la GaspésieFR
Le Canada en train, de Vancouver à Montréal avec le TranscanadienFR
De New York à Montréal par la côte!FR
More discussions
Bonjour
Je prévois de voyager cet hiver à travers l'Inde. Départ début décembre, retour en France à la mi-avril.
Ma préoccupation principale est de trouver La companie aérienne qui assure cet aller-retour avec le moins de soucis possibles sur les annulations ou les changements d'horaires de vol. Le contexte géopolitique agité au Moyen-Orient ne m'aide pas dans cette recherche, les avis récents lus en ligne sur les compagnies des États du Gulf décrivent pas mal de galères vécues ces derniers mois.
Les vols directs Paris-Delhi A/R que proposent Air France ou Air India sont probablement les plus sûrs mais pas les moins chers !
Dans ce doute, je patiente encore pour finaliser cet achat de billet... Avec peut-être quelques conseils et avis d'expériences des amoureux des Zindes sur VoyageForum.
Merci et Bons Voyages à tous.
Hi,
I’m thinking of heading to Malaysia soon.
I’ve seen some great prices and direct flights from Paris with Malaysia Airlines.
Is it a reliable airline?
Thanks for your feedback!
Hello,
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August. My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August. My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Hi there,
We had planned a trip to Sicily in August, and due to the volcanic eruption of Mount Etna, my flight was canceled. The airline is refunding the outbound flight, but none of the non-refundable expenses: accommodation booked through Booking, rental car, and the return flight aren’t covered. My SUPER Gold card doesn’t work in this specific case! :( If anyone has been in this situation, could you let me know if you were able to get any recourse and, if so, how?
Thanks in advance
I’ve been traveling regularly for over twenty years,
but this is the first time an airline has treated me as poorly as Air France.
Two trips, two problems. The latest:
Trip from Seoul to Rennes. Last leg from Paris CDG to Rennes with Air France.
I arrive in Paris and go straight to Air France to get my boarding pass to Rennes. They assure me my baggage is continuing to Rennes.
Arriving in Rennes, no baggage—same as five other people.
The Air France office is closed, and the airport staff tell me there’s rarely anyone there.
With the help of the airport staff, I file a claim online, and my baggage is almost immediately located. As a result, I’m told I’ll have it the next day.
Four days later, the baggage is still in the same place at CDG—nothing’s moving.
The problem is Air France has no customer service. What they call customer service is a department that takes an hour to answer and just repeats what’s on the online form. No coordination, no way to get things moving. I guess Air France would rather pay the compensation after 21 days than actually do something.
I’ve had lost baggage on other trips, but this is the first time I’ve seen such indifference and lack of professionalism.
but this is the first time an airline has treated me as poorly as Air France.
Two trips, two problems. The latest:
Trip from Seoul to Rennes. Last leg from Paris CDG to Rennes with Air France.
I arrive in Paris and go straight to Air France to get my boarding pass to Rennes. They assure me my baggage is continuing to Rennes.
Arriving in Rennes, no baggage—same as five other people.
The Air France office is closed, and the airport staff tell me there’s rarely anyone there.
With the help of the airport staff, I file a claim online, and my baggage is almost immediately located. As a result, I’m told I’ll have it the next day.
Four days later, the baggage is still in the same place at CDG—nothing’s moving.
The problem is Air France has no customer service. What they call customer service is a department that takes an hour to answer and just repeats what’s on the online form. No coordination, no way to get things moving. I guess Air France would rather pay the compensation after 21 days than actually do something.
I’ve had lost baggage on other trips, but this is the first time I’ve seen such indifference and lack of professionalism.
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi,
I booked an Etihad ticket on their website for Dusseldorf-Abu Dhabi. In the first name field, I entered all my first names (something I never do and I regret it, but the site was confusing). Everything is spelled correctly, but the problem is that I just received my new passport and only my first two first names and the first letter of the third appear—there’s no trace of the last one.
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in. Thanks for your feedback!
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in. Thanks for your feedback!
Hi everyone,
Next January, I’m heading to India.
My outbound flight is with Emirates from Paris to Dubai, then another Emirates flight from Dubai to Calcutta.
Could anyone tell me how the connection works? I’ve heard there’s a dedicated Emirates zone, but how does it actually work in practice—I’ve got a 2-hour layover.
Thanks so much!
Take care.
Hi there,
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon. I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport. Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…). AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly. On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double! In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others? Given the price difference, I’m hesitant… Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go? Thanks, HERVE
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon. I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport. Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…). AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly. On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double! In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others? Given the price difference, I’m hesitant… Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go? Thanks, HERVE
Hi everyone, I’ve unfortunately only just noticed that I booked two flight tickets, but I made a mistake on the second first name. Basically, my computer auto-filled and typed my first name twice, so both tickets are in my first name. Only the last names—mine and my friend’s—are correct.
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common). I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common). I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
Hello,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Hi there,
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
Hi,
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
Hi there,
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
Hi,
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
Hi,
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
Hello,
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
Hello,
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Hi everyone,
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
Hi there!
Has anyone taken the direct flight from CDG to Las Vegas with Air France?
Looking forward to your feedback!
Hey everyone,
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
Hi there,
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric
Hi there,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
