I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in. Thanks for your feedback!
Tarifs des compagnies low cost élevés
by Carolaix
This discussion is in French, the community’s main language.
ontaien dit:
"Ensuite, dsl si je parle de Ryanair, ils ont un taux de ponctualité de plus de 90% ce qui veut dire quand les avions partent à l'heure indiquée, ils respectent seulement 25 minutes de temps d'escale"
N'importe quoi Tu dis que tu t'y connais mais tu sais meme pas que les statistiques de ponctualite de Ryanair sont calcules a l'arrivee et pas au depart.... L'avion peut tres bien partir a l'heure mais avoir un temps de rotation de 30 min. En plus de donner des fausses informations, de nous dire de ne pas parler de ce qu'on connait pas, tu vas meme jusqu'a confondre temps de rotation programmé et temps de rotation réel. Pour ta gouverne, les low cost comme les traditionnelles ont tendances a augmenter artificiellement leurs temps de vol. Voila pourquoi un TLSORY sera programme en 1h20 alors qu'il sera pratiquement toujours effectue en 1h. Bref
Tu dis qu'il faut generaliser. Je parlais bien de generaliser et de moyenne. Prends un chrono a NCE, a BVA ou a TLS et tu verras que les temps de rotations ne sont pratiquement jamais de 25 minutes. Que LA MOYENNE est de + de 30 min. C'est pas en nous disant que "Le temps de rotation représente la différence entre l'heure d'arrivée et celle de départ des vols indiquées par la Cie" ou en nous disant que les low cost utilisent generalement le meme type avion pour economiser des couts sur les qualifs des pilotes que tu vas nous apprendre quelque chose...
Pour revenir sur ton CRLSTN, tu disais exactement "Il est certain qu'une ligne de Stansted vers Marseille où le taux de remplissage moyen frise les 98%, et une ligne Poitiers-Stansted où on tourne plus vers 65% de taux de remplissage, on peut pas faire de comparaison ! " C'est bien de nous dire de ne pas parler de ce qu'on connait pas mais la ligne a ete ouverte le 8 novembre... Donc, meme si ta conference a eu lieu en decembre (ce que je doute), le premier load sur un mois plein n'aurait pu etre disponible qu'en janvier 2007. Donc tu mens.
J'en arrete avec toi car je ne veux pas continuer de disctuer avec qq un qui se dit connaisseur mais qui ne donnent que des fausses informations qui alimentent la peur de certains passagers envers les low costs.
Fenua, merci pour tes infos. Je connais un peu les low costs allemandes (germanwings est d'ailleurs un des rares low cost appartenant a une major qui soit un succes, cf Buzz etc en attendant de voir ce que fera clickair ou transavia france) mais merci pour tes precisions. Je vois bien que t'es pas fan de Ryanair, et d'ailleurs depuis qu'on en a discute, je reconnais que leur service client est leur point faible, ce qui est d'autant plus bizarre que leur modele (LUV) en est un champion, plusieurs fois recompenses pour leur qualite.
Au moins avec toi on peut discuter. Honnetement pour rYanair, quand on regarde les vrais chiffres et pas des informations completement inventees, on se rends compte que bcp de choses qu'on leurs reprochent sont fausses.
Je suis d'accord sur ta phrase de conclusion. J'apprecie egalement bcp easyJet. Seul l'avenir nous dira qui subsiterra... En tout cas, la periode actuelle est passionante. Que dis je? toutes les periodes ont toujours ete passionantes dans l'aviation!!! 🙂
N'importe quoi Tu dis que tu t'y connais mais tu sais meme pas que les statistiques de ponctualite de Ryanair sont calcules a l'arrivee et pas au depart.... L'avion peut tres bien partir a l'heure mais avoir un temps de rotation de 30 min. En plus de donner des fausses informations, de nous dire de ne pas parler de ce qu'on connait pas, tu vas meme jusqu'a confondre temps de rotation programmé et temps de rotation réel. Pour ta gouverne, les low cost comme les traditionnelles ont tendances a augmenter artificiellement leurs temps de vol. Voila pourquoi un TLSORY sera programme en 1h20 alors qu'il sera pratiquement toujours effectue en 1h. Bref
Tu dis qu'il faut generaliser. Je parlais bien de generaliser et de moyenne. Prends un chrono a NCE, a BVA ou a TLS et tu verras que les temps de rotations ne sont pratiquement jamais de 25 minutes. Que LA MOYENNE est de + de 30 min. C'est pas en nous disant que "Le temps de rotation représente la différence entre l'heure d'arrivée et celle de départ des vols indiquées par la Cie" ou en nous disant que les low cost utilisent generalement le meme type avion pour economiser des couts sur les qualifs des pilotes que tu vas nous apprendre quelque chose...
Pour revenir sur ton CRLSTN, tu disais exactement "Il est certain qu'une ligne de Stansted vers Marseille où le taux de remplissage moyen frise les 98%, et une ligne Poitiers-Stansted où on tourne plus vers 65% de taux de remplissage, on peut pas faire de comparaison ! " C'est bien de nous dire de ne pas parler de ce qu'on connait pas mais la ligne a ete ouverte le 8 novembre... Donc, meme si ta conference a eu lieu en decembre (ce que je doute), le premier load sur un mois plein n'aurait pu etre disponible qu'en janvier 2007. Donc tu mens.
J'en arrete avec toi car je ne veux pas continuer de disctuer avec qq un qui se dit connaisseur mais qui ne donnent que des fausses informations qui alimentent la peur de certains passagers envers les low costs.
Fenua, merci pour tes infos. Je connais un peu les low costs allemandes (germanwings est d'ailleurs un des rares low cost appartenant a une major qui soit un succes, cf Buzz etc en attendant de voir ce que fera clickair ou transavia france) mais merci pour tes precisions. Je vois bien que t'es pas fan de Ryanair, et d'ailleurs depuis qu'on en a discute, je reconnais que leur service client est leur point faible, ce qui est d'autant plus bizarre que leur modele (LUV) en est un champion, plusieurs fois recompenses pour leur qualite.
Au moins avec toi on peut discuter. Honnetement pour rYanair, quand on regarde les vrais chiffres et pas des informations completement inventees, on se rends compte que bcp de choses qu'on leurs reprochent sont fausses.
Je suis d'accord sur ta phrase de conclusion. J'apprecie egalement bcp easyJet. Seul l'avenir nous dira qui subsiterra... En tout cas, la periode actuelle est passionante. Que dis je? toutes les periodes ont toujours ete passionantes dans l'aviation!!! 🙂
Tu sais, on peut aimer certaines compagnies et moins aimer d'autres !!
Il faudrait quand meme un jour que j'essayer Ryanair, ils desservent Karlsruhe-Baden Baden et Friedrischshafen pas tres loin de chez moi !
Si Ryanair a beaucoup de "fausses rumeurs" à leur encontre, c'est peut etre aussi qu'ils ont une communication tellement agressive et exagérée, que en retour le moindre "incident" à leur égar prends des proportions tres élevées !! Un peu le retour du baton !!
Ce qui me dérange le plus à leur égar c'est la communication trop agressive et les subventions publiques qu'ils touchent... en tout cas un systeme pas tres clair ou ils mettent un peu trop la pression à mon gout sur les aéroports et collectivités locales !
Je connais un peu le systeme allemand pour habiter à coté. J'ai récupéré l'autre jour les horaires DBA. C'est une compagnie interieure qui exploite des F100 et B734. J'ai fait des simulations de prix sur les vols interieurs, et en s y prenant un momment à l'avance ils peuvent etre attractifs, mais les prix montent vite ! Je ne les classerai pas dans le low cost pur... Plutot un mélange, compagnie à tarifs modérés et tarification unique voir parfois seulement deux niveaux de prix : pas cher et flexible.
J'ai prix 4 fois NIKI entre ZRH et VIE : j'ai énormément apprécié, tres bonne qualité, mais pas si low cost que ca. Assez rare de trovuer moins de 100 EUR le vol AR ! comme dit, tarifs "moderes". Un peu le meme concept que Air Berlin sur laquelle j'avais vu un reportage à la télé allemande il y a quelques temps.
Je trouve tres dommage qu'en France il n'y a pas de vrai alternative à Air France, et que la concurrence se limite à Air France / TGV. En allemagne le chemin de fer (DB) est tres performant, les trains de meilleure qualité qu'en France et, à mon gout, beaucoup plus attractifs. Pourtant le transport aérien se porte bien, meme si la population est plus concentrée dans les aires urbaines. Il n'empeche que la politique d'Air France de tout concentrer est un peu dommage. Je pense en particulier au rachat de toutes les compagnies régionales viables (Brit Air, Regional Airlines, Proteus) et les partenariats quasi exclusifs avec les autres (Twin Jet, Airlinair, CCM).
Easyjet annonce sur son site vouloir se développer au départ de France. Je lance une idée... poruquoi ne participeraient ils pas aux appels d'offres ?? Ils pourraient tres bien expoiter certaines lignes en A319, comme ORY UIP, ORY LRT, ainsi que le bord à bord corse et les liaisons Corse Paris ! Exemple : Paris Quimper/Lorient. 4 vols par jour en Fokker 100 et une desserte ferroviaire pas tres performante (env.4h/4h30). Remplacer les 4 AR en F100 par 3 AR en A319 augementerai le nombre de places offertes (468 au lieu de 400 par jour), permetterai peut etre de lancer des nouvelles liaisons au départ de Orly avec ces avions voir au départ des régions vers Londres ou Berlin par exemple ! Le prix moyen payé par les passagers des liaisons vers Paris baisserait probablement, apportant une nouvelle clientele, le nouveau tarif "flexible fare" sera interessant pour la clientele d'affaire, et peut etre les subventions des collectivités baisseraient !! En etant un peu fou je dirai que peut etre Lannion pourrait bénéficier de 2 rotations par jour en A319. De plus ces zones sont tres touristiques en été et bénéficient d'un fort traffic de fin de semaine ! Pour la Corse : si en basse saison la surcapacité sera un peu forte, la haute saison compensera le tout ! De plus, les avions basés en corse pourraient assurer des nouvelles lignes, vers le royaume uni ou l'allemagne, ce qui augmenterai l'attrait touristique !! 3 A319 pour les déssertes de Ajaccio, 3 pour Bastia, 1 ou 2 pour Figari et Calvi devraient faire l'affaire !! Quand au tarifs, seul le tarif "resident corse" devrait etre plafonné, les autres suivant les regles standard d'easy !! Qu'en pensez vous ??? Pense pas que mon argumentation soit totalement folle !!
Je connais un peu le systeme allemand pour habiter à coté. J'ai récupéré l'autre jour les horaires DBA. C'est une compagnie interieure qui exploite des F100 et B734. J'ai fait des simulations de prix sur les vols interieurs, et en s y prenant un momment à l'avance ils peuvent etre attractifs, mais les prix montent vite ! Je ne les classerai pas dans le low cost pur... Plutot un mélange, compagnie à tarifs modérés et tarification unique voir parfois seulement deux niveaux de prix : pas cher et flexible.
J'ai prix 4 fois NIKI entre ZRH et VIE : j'ai énormément apprécié, tres bonne qualité, mais pas si low cost que ca. Assez rare de trovuer moins de 100 EUR le vol AR ! comme dit, tarifs "moderes". Un peu le meme concept que Air Berlin sur laquelle j'avais vu un reportage à la télé allemande il y a quelques temps.
Je trouve tres dommage qu'en France il n'y a pas de vrai alternative à Air France, et que la concurrence se limite à Air France / TGV. En allemagne le chemin de fer (DB) est tres performant, les trains de meilleure qualité qu'en France et, à mon gout, beaucoup plus attractifs. Pourtant le transport aérien se porte bien, meme si la population est plus concentrée dans les aires urbaines. Il n'empeche que la politique d'Air France de tout concentrer est un peu dommage. Je pense en particulier au rachat de toutes les compagnies régionales viables (Brit Air, Regional Airlines, Proteus) et les partenariats quasi exclusifs avec les autres (Twin Jet, Airlinair, CCM).
Easyjet annonce sur son site vouloir se développer au départ de France. Je lance une idée... poruquoi ne participeraient ils pas aux appels d'offres ?? Ils pourraient tres bien expoiter certaines lignes en A319, comme ORY UIP, ORY LRT, ainsi que le bord à bord corse et les liaisons Corse Paris ! Exemple : Paris Quimper/Lorient. 4 vols par jour en Fokker 100 et une desserte ferroviaire pas tres performante (env.4h/4h30). Remplacer les 4 AR en F100 par 3 AR en A319 augementerai le nombre de places offertes (468 au lieu de 400 par jour), permetterai peut etre de lancer des nouvelles liaisons au départ de Orly avec ces avions voir au départ des régions vers Londres ou Berlin par exemple ! Le prix moyen payé par les passagers des liaisons vers Paris baisserait probablement, apportant une nouvelle clientele, le nouveau tarif "flexible fare" sera interessant pour la clientele d'affaire, et peut etre les subventions des collectivités baisseraient !! En etant un peu fou je dirai que peut etre Lannion pourrait bénéficier de 2 rotations par jour en A319. De plus ces zones sont tres touristiques en été et bénéficient d'un fort traffic de fin de semaine ! Pour la Corse : si en basse saison la surcapacité sera un peu forte, la haute saison compensera le tout ! De plus, les avions basés en corse pourraient assurer des nouvelles lignes, vers le royaume uni ou l'allemagne, ce qui augmenterai l'attrait touristique !! 3 A319 pour les déssertes de Ajaccio, 3 pour Bastia, 1 ou 2 pour Figari et Calvi devraient faire l'affaire !! Quand au tarifs, seul le tarif "resident corse" devrait etre plafonné, les autres suivant les regles standard d'easy !! Qu'en pensez vous ??? Pense pas que mon argumentation soit totalement folle !!
fenua
je suis sur et certain qu'easyjet aurait pu exploiter de maniere rentable une ligne paris-corse, sans avoir besoin d'aucune subvention d'OSP!
L'argument de dire qu'ils voulaient le faire que pendant la sainson ete est absurde. Toutes les routes soleil d'easyjet (vers l'espagne, l'italie etc) ne sont jamis coupees pendant l'ete, tout juste parfois une frequence en moins, et encore c'est tres rare!
Sans compter que la communaute corse est importante sur paris, assurant des loads corrects pendant l'hiver, et des supers loads l'ete
fenua
je suis sur et certain qu'easyjet aurait pu exploiter de maniere rentable une ligne paris-corse, sans avoir besoin d'aucune subvention d'OSP! ..
Pas possible ! une cie doit imperativement passer par la "selection" OSP (pour les AP concernés)
Pas possible ! une cie doit imperativement passer par la "selection" OSP (pour les AP concernés)
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
fenua
je suis sur et certain qu'easyjet aurait pu exploiter de maniere rentable une ligne paris-corse, sans avoir besoin d'aucune subvention d'OSP! ..
Pas possible ! une cie doit imperativement passer par la "selection" OSP (pour les AP concernés)
ben oui justement c'est ca qui est absurde pourquoi imposer une OSP alors qu'une compagnie se propose de l'operer sans subvention???
Pas possible ! une cie doit imperativement passer par la "selection" OSP (pour les AP concernés)
ben oui justement c'est ca qui est absurde pourquoi imposer une OSP alors qu'une compagnie se propose de l'operer sans subvention???
Je ne vais pas m'amuser éternellement avec toi, ca ne sert à rien, simplement pour te dire, dans les informations que je donne, je ne me base pas que sur ma "fameuse" conférence Ryanair, je travaille avec eux, assez souvent, je vois comment ils fonctionnent !
Quand à me dire que Mr Sherrad n'est pas l'un des bras droit de Mr O'Leary (parce-qu'ils sont plusieurs, je n'ai pas dit qu'il était seul, encore une fois ! ), dans leur Board of Director, ils sont 7 ou 8.
Mais où est-ce que tu vas contester des choses comme cà.
Mr Sherrad est directeur communication et est l'un des directeur marketing Ryanair ! (si tu veux, je te donnerai son mail, comme ca, tu n'auras qu'à vériifier çà par toi-même !
Enfin, la seule chose que je peux pas laisser passer, pceke là, c'est vraiment du foutage de gueule, c'est quand tu dis que je fais peur aux autres avec mes informations fausses.
Mais, d'abord, tu ne m'as jamais encore parlé de tes sources, et même si je me suis mal exprimé sur certaines choses ( je l'ai deja dit sur des posts précedents, tu continues à penser que je dis des choses fausses.
Ben, verifie à 2 fois avant de dire que je me trompe !
Les seules informations qui n'étaient pas 100% exactes, elles viennent de Ryanair, quand je les ai rencontré en décembre.
Tout le reste sont des infos que je recois tous les jours au bureau, car n'oublie pas que je travaille dans l'aérien.
Alors, on va clore ce débat pceke je n'ai pas vraiment envie de m'amuser avec des gens qui croient tout connaitre, tu me dis que je connais rien, que je mens et que je dis des choses fausses. Ben, reste avec tes certitudes !! Ca me dérange absolument pas mais ne dis pas que je fais peur aux autres, pceke la vraiment, c'est au-dessus de tout !
Tu disais que tes sources venaient d'Internet, t'es vraiment bien naif au point de croire que tout ce qu'on te dit sur Internet est juste. Cherche plutot les reports de compagnies aériennes, ce sera plus fiable !! (si je peux te donner un conseil)
Bon, je vais m'arreter la, ca sert à rien de continuer !
Salut
Alors, on va clore ce débat pceke je n'ai pas vraiment envie de m'amuser avec des gens qui croient tout connaitre, tu me dis que je connais rien, que je mens et que je dis des choses fausses. Ben, reste avec tes certitudes !! Ca me dérange absolument pas mais ne dis pas que je fais peur aux autres, pceke la vraiment, c'est au-dessus de tout !
Tu disais que tes sources venaient d'Internet, t'es vraiment bien naif au point de croire que tout ce qu'on te dit sur Internet est juste. Cherche plutot les reports de compagnies aériennes, ce sera plus fiable !! (si je peux te donner un conseil)
Bon, je vais m'arreter la, ca sert à rien de continuer !
Salut
1. je travaille aussi dans l'aerien
2. Mr Sherrad n'est pas le numero deux de Ryanair, dire que c'est son bras droit est faux. Si y'a un numero 2 c'est M.Cawley, head of financial and commercial. Tout le monde voit bien qu'un Head of commercial and finance est plus plus eleve dans la hierarchie qu'un head of advertising. Sauf toi apparement. Je peux te donner son email si tu le souhaites
3. Merci de repondre a cette question: comment peux tu avoir un chiffre de load factor entre CRL et STN alors que la ligne n'etait pas encore lancee?
4. Tu dis "les seules lignes où Ryanair ne réalise pas forcément du bénéfice, c'est entre aéroports secondaires (hors base)". Tu ne m'as toujours pas donne d'exemple de routes qui concernaient deux aeroports hors base... Tu n'as donc toujours pas reconnu que ton argument etait absurde
5. Tu dis: "75% des lignes de Ryanair partent de l'une de leurs 17 bases" alors que 100% des routes partent de leurs bases. J'attends ton mea culpa
6. Tu dis que Ryanair opere des 737-500 et des 737-800. Je te dis qu'a l'heure actuelle ils n'operent que des 737-800, confirme par le site internet de la compagnie. Ils ont operes des 737-200 en propre et des 737-300 en leasing a ma connaissance, mais jamais de 737-500. A l'heure actuelle, la compagnie n'opere que des 737-800 avec une capacite de 189 places. Meme sur airliners il n'y a aucune photo de 737-500. Bref, Ryanair n'a jamais exploite de 737-500. Tu n'as pas encore fait ton mea culpa.
7. tu me parles de bon sens, mais l'utilisation avion = bloc time (temps de vol + taxi), un point c'est tout. Dire que un avion de Ryanair vole 14h par jour est faux. Tu ne l'as toujours pas reconnu. Tu dis "quand on parle de temps de vol, on parle également de l'escale entre 2 rotations". Incroyable que qq un du business dise ca! Donc pour toi, quand un avion est en escale, il vole!??? Si pour toi temps de vol = temps de vol + escale (tres logique), je te dis que ton argument est quand meme absurde vu qu'a ce moment la, les temps de vol (c'est a dire temps d evol + temps d'escale) des majors sont aussi de 14h... J'attends ton mea culpa.
8. Tu dis: ""ils ont un taux de ponctualité de plus de 90% ce qui veut dire quand les avions partent à l'heure indiquée" . Moi je te dis que ton argument est faux vu que la ponctualite de Ryanair est calcule a l'arrivee et non au depart. La aussi j'attends ton mea culpa.
Je m'arrete la (meme si y'a d'autres absurdites) Mes sources ne proviennent pas que d'internet. Tu as fais un mea culpa sur UN chiffre, alors que tu donnes plus d'une dizaine d'argument faux ou absurde. Je te rappelerais aussi que c'est toi qui est arrive en nous disant qu'il fallait qu'on arrete de parler de ce qu'on connaissait pas patati patata.
Merci de faire ton mea culpa sur tous les points precedents.
Et derniere chose, regarde tes premiers posts et tu verras que tu ne donne vraiment pas envie de voler sur Ryanair... C'est ce que je voulais dire dans mon post precedent. Cela m'a fait reagir car tous tes chiffrs etait faux ou absurde, je crois qu'on peut comprendre ma reaction.
Tu bosses avec Ryanair? N'hesite pas a dire pour quel aeroport tu bosses, ils seront ravis de savoir quelle image tu donnes de leurs compagnies...
2. Mr Sherrad n'est pas le numero deux de Ryanair, dire que c'est son bras droit est faux. Si y'a un numero 2 c'est M.Cawley, head of financial and commercial. Tout le monde voit bien qu'un Head of commercial and finance est plus plus eleve dans la hierarchie qu'un head of advertising. Sauf toi apparement. Je peux te donner son email si tu le souhaites
3. Merci de repondre a cette question: comment peux tu avoir un chiffre de load factor entre CRL et STN alors que la ligne n'etait pas encore lancee?
4. Tu dis "les seules lignes où Ryanair ne réalise pas forcément du bénéfice, c'est entre aéroports secondaires (hors base)". Tu ne m'as toujours pas donne d'exemple de routes qui concernaient deux aeroports hors base... Tu n'as donc toujours pas reconnu que ton argument etait absurde
5. Tu dis: "75% des lignes de Ryanair partent de l'une de leurs 17 bases" alors que 100% des routes partent de leurs bases. J'attends ton mea culpa
6. Tu dis que Ryanair opere des 737-500 et des 737-800. Je te dis qu'a l'heure actuelle ils n'operent que des 737-800, confirme par le site internet de la compagnie. Ils ont operes des 737-200 en propre et des 737-300 en leasing a ma connaissance, mais jamais de 737-500. A l'heure actuelle, la compagnie n'opere que des 737-800 avec une capacite de 189 places. Meme sur airliners il n'y a aucune photo de 737-500. Bref, Ryanair n'a jamais exploite de 737-500. Tu n'as pas encore fait ton mea culpa.
7. tu me parles de bon sens, mais l'utilisation avion = bloc time (temps de vol + taxi), un point c'est tout. Dire que un avion de Ryanair vole 14h par jour est faux. Tu ne l'as toujours pas reconnu. Tu dis "quand on parle de temps de vol, on parle également de l'escale entre 2 rotations". Incroyable que qq un du business dise ca! Donc pour toi, quand un avion est en escale, il vole!??? Si pour toi temps de vol = temps de vol + escale (tres logique), je te dis que ton argument est quand meme absurde vu qu'a ce moment la, les temps de vol (c'est a dire temps d evol + temps d'escale) des majors sont aussi de 14h... J'attends ton mea culpa.
8. Tu dis: ""ils ont un taux de ponctualité de plus de 90% ce qui veut dire quand les avions partent à l'heure indiquée" . Moi je te dis que ton argument est faux vu que la ponctualite de Ryanair est calcule a l'arrivee et non au depart. La aussi j'attends ton mea culpa.
Je m'arrete la (meme si y'a d'autres absurdites) Mes sources ne proviennent pas que d'internet. Tu as fais un mea culpa sur UN chiffre, alors que tu donnes plus d'une dizaine d'argument faux ou absurde. Je te rappelerais aussi que c'est toi qui est arrive en nous disant qu'il fallait qu'on arrete de parler de ce qu'on connaissait pas patati patata.
Merci de faire ton mea culpa sur tous les points precedents.
Et derniere chose, regarde tes premiers posts et tu verras que tu ne donne vraiment pas envie de voler sur Ryanair... C'est ce que je voulais dire dans mon post precedent. Cela m'a fait reagir car tous tes chiffrs etait faux ou absurde, je crois qu'on peut comprendre ma reaction.
Tu bosses avec Ryanair? N'hesite pas a dire pour quel aeroport tu bosses, ils seront ravis de savoir quelle image tu donnes de leurs compagnies...
Le temps de vol commercial se calcule du bloc-départ (fermeture des portes de l'avion) à l'arrivée au bloc de l'aéroport d'arrivée !
d'ailleurs tu te contredis toi meme vu qu'ici tu sous entend que le temps d'escale est exclu du tems de vol... La vrai definition des temps de rotation c'est freins mis a l'arrivee, frein debloques pour le depart push back Un point c'est tout Dire que le temps de vol = temps de vol + tems d'escale est faux et absurde
d'ailleurs tu te contredis toi meme vu qu'ici tu sous entend que le temps d'escale est exclu du tems de vol... La vrai definition des temps de rotation c'est freins mis a l'arrivee, frein debloques pour le depart push back Un point c'est tout Dire que le temps de vol = temps de vol + tems d'escale est faux et absurde
... Bon, je vais m'arreter la, ca sert à rien de continuer ! Salut
Sage décision mais avant explique ton affirmation sur les vols transatlantiques par Easyjet ....
Sage décision mais avant explique ton affirmation sur les vols transatlantiques par Easyjet ....
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Log in first, then come back to this page.
You might also like
Storm in the Canary Islands
New adventures from Perpignan to Ranchi (Jharkhand)
Breathtaking Kyrgyzstan!
Argentine and Chilean Patagonia from El Calafate to Ushuaia
Turkey 2026: Riviera, Antalya, and Cappadocia
Page by Page on the Assisi Way – 1,200 km on Foot
How to nail your trek in wet climates: which pants keep you truly dry?
Densha Otaku - Lesser-Known Regions
More discussions
Hi,
I booked an Etihad ticket on their website for Dusseldorf-Abu Dhabi. In the first name field, I entered all my first names (something I never do and I regret it, but the site was confusing). Everything is spelled correctly, but the problem is that I just received my new passport and only my first two first names and the first letter of the third appear—there’s no trace of the last one.
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in. Thanks for your feedback!
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in. Thanks for your feedback!
Hi everyone,
Next January, I’m heading to India.
My outbound flight is with Emirates from Paris to Dubai, then another Emirates flight from Dubai to Calcutta.
Could anyone tell me how the connection works? I’ve heard there’s a dedicated Emirates zone, but how does it actually work in practice—I’ve got a 2-hour layover.
Thanks so much!
Take care.
Hello,
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August. My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August. My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Hi there,
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon. I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport. Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…). AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly. On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double! In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others? Given the price difference, I’m hesitant… Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go? Thanks, HERVE
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon. I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport. Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…). AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly. On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double! In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others? Given the price difference, I’m hesitant… Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go? Thanks, HERVE
Hi everyone, I’ve unfortunately only just noticed that I booked two flight tickets, but I made a mistake on the second first name. Basically, my computer auto-filled and typed my first name twice, so both tickets are in my first name. Only the last names—mine and my friend’s—are correct.
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common). I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common). I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
Hello,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi there,
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
Hi,
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
Hi there,
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
Hi,
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
Hi,
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
Hello,
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
Hello,
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Hi everyone,
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
Hi there!
Has anyone taken the direct flight from CDG to Las Vegas with Air France?
Looking forward to your feedback!
Hey everyone,
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
Hi there,
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric
Hi there,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
Hi there,
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry
Hi there,
I have a question...
Has anyone managed to get a refund from Oman Air?
After a delayed flight, we missed our connecting flight to get home!! At midnight, the flight attendant booked us on a flight to Nice via Munich, even though we were in Munich and wanted to get back to Nice... Too tired from the trip, we didn’t notice the mistake!! The next day, of course, the booking wasn’t valid!! We had to pay again for the flight back to Nice... I’m really struggling!! I think they’re giving me the runaround!! I’ve sent several emails, tried Messenger and WhatsApp, but the only responses I get are: "We need to investigate!! We’ll get back to you in 15 days!!" It’s been over a month!!
I just sent a registered letter (LRAR) to their office at Paris Charles de Gaulle, which is still open!!
Do you have any other suggestions for me?
Thanks in advance for your help! Virginie
After a delayed flight, we missed our connecting flight to get home!! At midnight, the flight attendant booked us on a flight to Nice via Munich, even though we were in Munich and wanted to get back to Nice... Too tired from the trip, we didn’t notice the mistake!! The next day, of course, the booking wasn’t valid!! We had to pay again for the flight back to Nice... I’m really struggling!! I think they’re giving me the runaround!! I’ve sent several emails, tried Messenger and WhatsApp, but the only responses I get are: "We need to investigate!! We’ll get back to you in 15 days!!" It’s been over a month!!
I just sent a registered letter (LRAR) to their office at Paris Charles de Gaulle, which is still open!!
Do you have any other suggestions for me?
Thanks in advance for your help! Virginie
Hi!
Sri Lanka has announced it could run out of fuel in the coming weeks if the Strait of Hormuz remains blocked. The government has implemented a mandatory four-day workweek to save oil, and there are long lines at gas stations due to fears of an early shortage.
In Vietnam, the government has warned all airlines that flights will need to be reduced due to a lack of kerosene. The country imports two-thirds of its jet fuel from China and Thailand, but both countries have now banned exports out of fear of domestic shortages.
The state is asking airlines to plan ahead and park aircraft to drastically reduce operations, starting with domestic flights and then international ones. International carriers will also need to cut back on their rotations.
This will begin in the coming days. 🙁
Hi there,
I’ve got a long layover (about 10 hours) in Seoul on an upcoming trip.
I arrive from Phnom Penh at 7:20 AM and depart for Montreal at 6:00 PM.
First question: Will my checked baggage be transferred automatically? I have a single ticket from KTI to YUL (Air Canada ticket—KTI-ICN operated by Asiana (codeshare) and ICN-YUL by Air Canada).
Second question: I saw it’s possible to join free guided tours (Airport Transit Tour). What do you think of this kind of service? And is my "actual" layover time (accounting for security checks, check-in, etc.) enough to do one of these tours?
Thanks in advance to everyone who chimes in on this!
First question: Will my checked baggage be transferred automatically? I have a single ticket from KTI to YUL (Air Canada ticket—KTI-ICN operated by Asiana (codeshare) and ICN-YUL by Air Canada).
Second question: I saw it’s possible to join free guided tours (Airport Transit Tour). What do you think of this kind of service? And is my "actual" layover time (accounting for security checks, check-in, etc.) enough to do one of these tours?
Thanks in advance to everyone who chimes in on this!