Air France: la Première et la cabine Affaires en 2012/2013
by Sscfbtsd
This discussion is in French, the community’s main language.
Depuis, le CDB en question se dit victime de harcèlement moral..
été
De la part de qui ? 😮 Des membres de sa famille à qui il a refusé le surclassement ? 🤪
été
De la part de qui ? 😮 Des membres de sa famille à qui il a refusé le surclassement ? 🤪
Le personnel des agences de voyage a également accès aux billets de faveur, comme le personnel des compagnies aériennes.
On se demande bien d'ailleurs au nom de quoi. 😐
On se demande bien d'ailleurs au nom de quoi. 😐
Attention toutefois à ce que je peux lire.
Le but de Air France est de faire, comme toute entreprise, du profit. Elle choisit donc une stratégie qui lui est propre et qui lui permettra d'y arriver. On connait tous des compagnies minables ( USA ) au service digne de Mac Do ( oui Flunch est encore pire!) et qui pourtant sont capables de dégager des résultats intéressants.
- Les prix, nous avons ici la vision du français, mais les prix sur les plateformes étrangères sont parfois bien différents. Pour 800$ un A/R JFK/CDG, vous avez le choix entre AA et AF, vous prenez qui?
- le NEV4 qui est de plus en plus présent sur la flotte AF est tout à fait respectable. Certes, on peut lire la critiques régulière, venant aussi bien des européens que des américains, comme quoi ce siège n'est pas plat. Néanmoins, il est bien plus confortable que l'ancien.
Le but de Air France est de faire, comme toute entreprise, du profit. Elle choisit donc une stratégie qui lui est propre et qui lui permettra d'y arriver. On connait tous des compagnies minables ( USA ) au service digne de Mac Do ( oui Flunch est encore pire!) et qui pourtant sont capables de dégager des résultats intéressants.
- Les prix, nous avons ici la vision du français, mais les prix sur les plateformes étrangères sont parfois bien différents. Pour 800$ un A/R JFK/CDG, vous avez le choix entre AA et AF, vous prenez qui?
- le NEV4 qui est de plus en plus présent sur la flotte AF est tout à fait respectable. Certes, on peut lire la critiques régulière, venant aussi bien des européens que des américains, comme quoi ce siège n'est pas plat. Néanmoins, il est bien plus confortable que l'ancien.
(...) Le but de Air France est de faire, comme toute entreprise, du profit. (...)
Pensez-vous que de ce strict point de vue, la stratégie suivie par AF soit couronnée de succès?
- Les prix, nous avons ici la vision du français, mais les prix sur les plateformes étrangères sont parfois bien différents. Pour 800$ un A/R JFK/CDG, vous avez le choix entre AA et AF, vous prenez qui?
$800 en classe affaires? C'est un bon prix 😏.
- le NEV4 qui est de plus en plus présent sur la flotte AF est tout à fait respectable. Certes, on peut lire la critiques régulière, venant aussi bien des européens que des américains, comme quoi ce siège n'est pas plat. Néanmoins, il est bien plus confortable que l'ancien.
Ce qui vous amène à quelle conclusion?
Il est mieux que l'ancien soit (et encore, seulement pour les passagers qui ont de grandes jambes), mais est-ce suffisant pour le faire aimer des passagers HC?
Et puis dans la prestation classe affaire, n'y a-t-il que le siège? Quid du catering, du service, de la présence des PNC en cabines pendant le vol, etc?
Et pour finir, le rapport qualité/prix est-il bon, notamment vers l'Asie? Un NEV4 moins bien que les sièges des concurrents pourquoi pas, si le prix est inférieur, mais est-ce le cas?
Pensez-vous que de ce strict point de vue, la stratégie suivie par AF soit couronnée de succès?
- Les prix, nous avons ici la vision du français, mais les prix sur les plateformes étrangères sont parfois bien différents. Pour 800$ un A/R JFK/CDG, vous avez le choix entre AA et AF, vous prenez qui?
$800 en classe affaires? C'est un bon prix 😏.
- le NEV4 qui est de plus en plus présent sur la flotte AF est tout à fait respectable. Certes, on peut lire la critiques régulière, venant aussi bien des européens que des américains, comme quoi ce siège n'est pas plat. Néanmoins, il est bien plus confortable que l'ancien.
Ce qui vous amène à quelle conclusion?
Il est mieux que l'ancien soit (et encore, seulement pour les passagers qui ont de grandes jambes), mais est-ce suffisant pour le faire aimer des passagers HC?
Et puis dans la prestation classe affaire, n'y a-t-il que le siège? Quid du catering, du service, de la présence des PNC en cabines pendant le vol, etc?
Et pour finir, le rapport qualité/prix est-il bon, notamment vers l'Asie? Un NEV4 moins bien que les sièges des concurrents pourquoi pas, si le prix est inférieur, mais est-ce le cas?
Et pour finir, le rapport qualité/prix est-il bon, notamment vers l'Asie? Un NEV4 moins bien que les sièges des concurrents pourquoi pas, si le prix est inférieur, mais est-ce le cas?
Comme toujours, d'excellentes questions qui, j'en ai peur, resteront sans réponse.
Comme toujours, d'excellentes questions qui, j'en ai peur, resteront sans réponse.
On peut faire du profit certes , en ayant un excellent rapport qualité prix et offrir un bon confort , tout est question d'habileté et de dosage savants . Etre aussi à l'écoute des passagers me semble très important ...
Quant à nous autres français bien habitués nous sommes très exigents alors que pour les américains et leurs cies minables AF apparait comme une EMIRATES 5 étoiles Luxe ... AF a en effet très bonne presse aux USA .Si AF peut y faire de l'argent sa grosse clientèle reste tout de même européenne avec sa plateforme de CDG qui a mauvaise presse .
Le personnel des agences de voyage a également accès aux billets de faveur, comme le personnel des compagnies aériennes.
Oui, AF donne des billets de faveurs sous forme de N1/N2 aux agences de voyages. Et AF fait également partie des groupements ZED & MIBA. Les personnes en non rev sur ces programmes passent après les GP AF.
Oui, AF donne des billets de faveurs sous forme de N1/N2 aux agences de voyages. Et AF fait également partie des groupements ZED & MIBA. Les personnes en non rev sur ces programmes passent après les GP AF.
Tout ce qui ne vous tue pas peut faire l'objet d'un ACARS
Pensez-vous que de ce strict point de vue, la stratégie suivie par AF soit couronnée de succès?
Non, absolument pas. Plusieurs raisons: - parmi les trois majors européennes, AF est celle qui compte le plus de personnel. C'est un énorme frein. - pour jurer sur la classe économique, il faudrait déjà la rendre rentable! ce n'est pas le cas. Visiblement, ils sont en bonne voie, le service va être réduit, ce qui permettra de faire des économies.
$800 en classe affaires? C'est un bon prix 😏.
...
Quid du catering, du service, de la présence des PNC en cabines pendant le vol, etc?
Nouveau protocole, amélioration remarquable du catering ces derniers mois. Je vous invite à reprendre AF vous verrez!
Ce qui vous amène à quelle conclusion?
Globalement les passagers sont satisfaits.
L'erreur viendra de croire que remplir un avion avec des 99 euros A/R! au départ de Marseille! c'est fantastique! Ce n'est pas le cas, l'avion est complet certes, mais non rentable! d'où un fort risque d’échec!
Non, absolument pas. Plusieurs raisons: - parmi les trois majors européennes, AF est celle qui compte le plus de personnel. C'est un énorme frein. - pour jurer sur la classe économique, il faudrait déjà la rendre rentable! ce n'est pas le cas. Visiblement, ils sont en bonne voie, le service va être réduit, ce qui permettra de faire des économies.
$800 en classe affaires? C'est un bon prix 😏.
...
Quid du catering, du service, de la présence des PNC en cabines pendant le vol, etc?
Nouveau protocole, amélioration remarquable du catering ces derniers mois. Je vous invite à reprendre AF vous verrez!
Ce qui vous amène à quelle conclusion?
Globalement les passagers sont satisfaits.
L'erreur viendra de croire que remplir un avion avec des 99 euros A/R! au départ de Marseille! c'est fantastique! Ce n'est pas le cas, l'avion est complet certes, mais non rentable! d'où un fort risque d’échec!
AF donne des billets de faveurs sous forme de N1/N2 aux agences de voyages.
Encore une fois, on se demande bien pourquoi.
Encore une fois, on se demande bien pourquoi.
AF donne des billets de faveurs sous forme de N1/N2 aux agences de voyages.
Encore une fois, on se demande bien pourquoi.
Disons que 65% de la vente de billets (pour AF uniquement, KL c'est le contraire) provient des agences de voyages, donc c'est un marché à choyer pour AF :)
Encore une fois, on se demande bien pourquoi.
Disons que 65% de la vente de billets (pour AF uniquement, KL c'est le contraire) provient des agences de voyages, donc c'est un marché à choyer pour AF :)
Tout ce qui ne vous tue pas peut faire l'objet d'un ACARS
AF donne des billets de faveurs sous forme de N1/N2 aux agences de voyages.
Encore une fois, on se demande bien pourquoi.
Je comprends votre stupéfaction face une absurdité pareille. Ces agences de voyages vendent des billets à des PAX qui prennent la place des GP, et on leur donne des billets, aggravant la pénurie en Y et perturbant les surclassements en J, de manière parfois imprévisible. Qui plus est, cela fait autant d'importuns qui génèrent du travail supplémentaire à bord, alors que quatre PNC ont déjà peine à faire face à la tâche dans un A319 . La direction commerciale d'AF marche vraiment sur la tête.
Encore une fois, on se demande bien pourquoi.
Je comprends votre stupéfaction face une absurdité pareille. Ces agences de voyages vendent des billets à des PAX qui prennent la place des GP, et on leur donne des billets, aggravant la pénurie en Y et perturbant les surclassements en J, de manière parfois imprévisible. Qui plus est, cela fait autant d'importuns qui génèrent du travail supplémentaire à bord, alors que quatre PNC ont déjà peine à faire face à la tâche dans un A319 . La direction commerciale d'AF marche vraiment sur la tête.
Ces agences de voyages vendent des billets à des PAX qui prennent la place des GP, et on leur donne des billets
Rassurez moi. Ces gens touchent un salaire pour leur activité et perçoivent bien des commissions , non ? 🙂 Ou ne sont t-ils rémunérés qu'en billets d'avion ?
Rassurez moi. Ces gens touchent un salaire pour leur activité et perçoivent bien des commissions , non ? 🙂 Ou ne sont t-ils rémunérés qu'en billets d'avion ?
Rassurez moi. Ces gens touchent un salaire pour leur activité et perçoivent bien des commissions , non ? 🙂 Ou ne sont t-ils rémunérés qu'en billets d'avion ?
ils ne percoivent pas ou très très peu de commissions, ils facturent des frais d'emission pour se rémunérer. Cependant AF doit bien avoir des programmes incitatifs sur les volumes. Avec d'autres compagnies, souvent plus petites, les agents de voyages sont commissionnés sur les ventes, et ils facturent en plus des frais de service comme pour les autres, se payant ainsi deux fois plutôt qu'une.
ils ne percoivent pas ou très très peu de commissions, ils facturent des frais d'emission pour se rémunérer. Cependant AF doit bien avoir des programmes incitatifs sur les volumes. Avec d'autres compagnies, souvent plus petites, les agents de voyages sont commissionnés sur les ventes, et ils facturent en plus des frais de service comme pour les autres, se payant ainsi deux fois plutôt qu'une.
Je pense que ces billets sont aussi une forme de compensation d'AF à destination des agences suite à la suppression du commissionnement (en 2005 je crois).
En effet, suite à cette suppression (qui coûtait très cher à AF), beaucoup d'agences se sont détournées de la compagnie tricolore au profit d'autres transporteurs qui ont continué leur politique de commissions. Octroyer des billets N1/N2 aux voyagistes constitue ainsi une sorte d'incentive pour les commerciaux de ces agences qui ont ainsi un plus grand intérêt personnel à favoriser AF. Cela coûte sans doute moins cher à AF que le précédent système.
En effet, suite à cette suppression (qui coûtait très cher à AF), beaucoup d'agences se sont détournées de la compagnie tricolore au profit d'autres transporteurs qui ont continué leur politique de commissions. Octroyer des billets N1/N2 aux voyagistes constitue ainsi une sorte d'incentive pour les commerciaux de ces agences qui ont ainsi un plus grand intérêt personnel à favoriser AF. Cela coûte sans doute moins cher à AF que le précédent système.
Octroyer des billets N1/N2 aux voyagistes constitue ainsi une sorte d'incentive pour les commerciaux de ces agences qui ont ainsi un plus grand intérêt personnel à favoriser AF.
On marche sur la tête. Les producteurs de fraises et de salade rémunèrent t-ils la grande distribution en scaroles et en gariguettes ? 🤪
On marche sur la tête. Les producteurs de fraises et de salade rémunèrent t-ils la grande distribution en scaroles et en gariguettes ? 🤪
On marche sur la tête. Les producteurs de fraises et de salade rémunèrent t-ils la grande distribution en scaroles et en gariguettes ?
Non. Ils leur vendent et ne s'en occupent plus après. A charge pour la distribution de trouver des acheteurs (et de fixer sa marge). Je ne discuterai pas sur le niveau des prix : ce n'est pas l'objet. La grande distribution est une activité commerciale, agent de voyage est une activité d'intermédiaire mandaté par la compagnie ou le voyagiste. Ils vendent des voyages pour le compte d'autrui et non pas quelque chose qu'ils ont acheté. On n'est pas dans le même cas.
Non. Ils leur vendent et ne s'en occupent plus après. A charge pour la distribution de trouver des acheteurs (et de fixer sa marge). Je ne discuterai pas sur le niveau des prix : ce n'est pas l'objet. La grande distribution est une activité commerciale, agent de voyage est une activité d'intermédiaire mandaté par la compagnie ou le voyagiste. Ils vendent des voyages pour le compte d'autrui et non pas quelque chose qu'ils ont acheté. On n'est pas dans le même cas.
Octroyer des billets N1/N2 aux voyagistes constitue ainsi une sorte d'incentive pour les commerciaux de ces agences qui ont ainsi un plus grand intérêt personnel à favoriser AF.
On marche sur la tête. Les producteurs de fraises et de salade rémunèrent t-ils la grande distribution en scaroles et en gariguettes ? 🤪
Vous savez très bien que ce sont des domaines d'activité où les contraintes sont très différentes. Les fruits et légumes peuvent se stocker (assez mal, certes). Une place d'avion ne se stocke pas. C'est précisément cela qui permet de valoriser aussi peu les bilelts N1/N2.
On marche sur la tête. Les producteurs de fraises et de salade rémunèrent t-ils la grande distribution en scaroles et en gariguettes ? 🤪
Vous savez très bien que ce sont des domaines d'activité où les contraintes sont très différentes. Les fruits et légumes peuvent se stocker (assez mal, certes). Une place d'avion ne se stocke pas. C'est précisément cela qui permet de valoriser aussi peu les bilelts N1/N2.
On marche sur la tête. Les producteurs de fraises et de salade rémunèrent t-ils la grande distribution en scaroles et en gariguettes ? 🤪
Offrir des avantages ou récompenses en nature à des vendeurs ou des revendeurs et une pratique très courante y compris dans l'industrie, pourquoi AF et/ou l'industrie touristique y échapperai ???
PS : je récuse par avance toutes les digressions à venir sur le terme "en nature" 😉
Offrir des avantages ou récompenses en nature à des vendeurs ou des revendeurs et une pratique très courante y compris dans l'industrie, pourquoi AF et/ou l'industrie touristique y échapperai ???
PS : je récuse par avance toutes les digressions à venir sur le terme "en nature" 😉
Ces agences de voyages vendent des billets à des PAX qui prennent la place des GP, et on leur donne des billets
Rassurez moi. Ces gens touchent un salaire pour leur activité et perçoivent bien des commissions , non ? 🙂 Ou ne sont t-ils rémunérés qu'en billets d'avion ?
1) Et les employés Air France qui reçoivent des billets moins chers, ils n'ont pas de salaire? Ne me comprenez pas mal, je ne suis PAS contre des billets à prix privilégié voire gratuits pour les employés. Mais je mets un point d'interrogation derrière la logique de "qqn reçoit un salaire/une commission pour son activité alors pourquoi lui donner d'autres avantages". La raison est: 2) Si Air France veut stimuler la vente de ses billets par les agents la compagnie a toute intérêt de leur faire vivre le produit et de leur le montrer dans sa meilleure lumière. Un agent qui ne connaît pas le produit ou qui en pense du mal ne le vendra pas. C'est donc une motivation commerciale de la part de la compagnie pour remplir ses avions.
Par rapport à un autre aspect discuté plus haut: il est bien connu que la politique officielle de surclassement d'AF ne privilégie pas les clients fidèles mais les employés/GP (sous prétexte que cela soit plus pratique), et il est aussi bien connu que les surclassements sauvages après fermeture des portes sont la normalité chez AF, et de manière plus systématique que chez de nombreuses autres compagnies. Je ne juge pas, je comprends que tout employé/GP préfère voyager en Affaires qu'en Eco. Mais je comprends aussi les clients fidèles qui en tirent leur conclusion sur la philosophie en matière de service et relations clients de la compagnie qui dans leurs yeux semble s'occuper d'abord du confort de ses employés et de leurs proches que de celui de ses clients. Mais on a eu ce débat de nombreuses fois dans ce forum, pas besoin de revenir dessus.
Rassurez moi. Ces gens touchent un salaire pour leur activité et perçoivent bien des commissions , non ? 🙂 Ou ne sont t-ils rémunérés qu'en billets d'avion ?
1) Et les employés Air France qui reçoivent des billets moins chers, ils n'ont pas de salaire? Ne me comprenez pas mal, je ne suis PAS contre des billets à prix privilégié voire gratuits pour les employés. Mais je mets un point d'interrogation derrière la logique de "qqn reçoit un salaire/une commission pour son activité alors pourquoi lui donner d'autres avantages". La raison est: 2) Si Air France veut stimuler la vente de ses billets par les agents la compagnie a toute intérêt de leur faire vivre le produit et de leur le montrer dans sa meilleure lumière. Un agent qui ne connaît pas le produit ou qui en pense du mal ne le vendra pas. C'est donc une motivation commerciale de la part de la compagnie pour remplir ses avions.
Par rapport à un autre aspect discuté plus haut: il est bien connu que la politique officielle de surclassement d'AF ne privilégie pas les clients fidèles mais les employés/GP (sous prétexte que cela soit plus pratique), et il est aussi bien connu que les surclassements sauvages après fermeture des portes sont la normalité chez AF, et de manière plus systématique que chez de nombreuses autres compagnies. Je ne juge pas, je comprends que tout employé/GP préfère voyager en Affaires qu'en Eco. Mais je comprends aussi les clients fidèles qui en tirent leur conclusion sur la philosophie en matière de service et relations clients de la compagnie qui dans leurs yeux semble s'occuper d'abord du confort de ses employés et de leurs proches que de celui de ses clients. Mais on a eu ce débat de nombreuses fois dans ce forum, pas besoin de revenir dessus.
Le problème c'est pas les surclassements, c'est qu'il y a trop de sièges invendus en première et en affaires sur beaucoup de vols. La réponse d'AF c'est de tout simplement réduire le nombre de ces sièges et de mettre plus de sièges en éco. Il y a fort à parier que le marché des billets éco plein tarif ou à tarif assez élevé est assez saturé dans la mesure où ils pourraient maintenant en proposer plus à la vente et avoir moins de quota pour les promos... donc rajouter des sièges en éco, c'est rajouter des sièges qui vont être bradés, parce que là le marché n'est généralement pas saturé: beaucoup de monde acheterait un billet si son prix passait en dessous d'un certain niveau.
Si on prend l'exemple du 777-200 d'AF, 28 sièges affaires ont été enlevés pour être remplacés par 76 sièges éco. Donc 1 siège business = 2.7 sièges eco... disons même 3! Si ces sièges éco sont vendus à un tarif promo, on peut considérer un revenu moyen de 250 EUR par segment hors taxes d'aéroport (mais en incluant les surcharges fuel), en prenant 600 EUR TTC avec 100 EUR taxes pour un billet pas cher en éco en moyenne (oui, 600 EUR c'est cher pour NYC mais c'est donné pour Buenos Aires, c'est une moyenne faite à vue de nez). Il faut aussi considérer que pour les billets au départ de province ou d'Europe, une partie du prix total hors taxes doit aussi contribuer au chiffre moyen courrier. C'est je pense à ce yield là, en moyenne, que les sièges éco supplémentaires seront vendus.
Les préstations à bord (repas, boissons, films, cout des sièges) doivent couter 3 fois plus en affaires qu'en éco. Le cout de PNC est aussi similaire: il y a sans doute 2-3 fois plus de PNC par pax en affaires qu'en eco, les PNC AF du forum pourraient donner les chiffres sur un vol plein. Au sol pareil, il y a un cout de salon et d'acces numero 1 supplémentaire mais au niveau de l'enregistrement et de la vente (pour faire des changements, encaisser des excédants bagages, etc.) c'est similaire. Donc au total grosso modo, un cout "sol" 3 fois superieur que pour un passager eco.
Donc si AF vendait en moyenne ses 28 sièges affaires qu'elle considère comme invendable 3 fois plus chers que ce qu'elle pourrait retirer de passagers éco, c'est a dire 750 EUR le segment HT, les couts étant similaires, la marge serait similaire. Et à mon avis, il doit y avoir un énorme marché pour des billets affaires à 1600 EUR aller retour, moyenné sur tout le réseau! Comme la demande devrait être importante, ils pourraient alors augmenter un peu les tarifs, donc vendre plus de billets à 2000 EUR TTC aller retour (toujours en moyenne) en remplissant correctement sa classe affaires. Des contrats entreprises et un peu de yield management pour jouer sur les ouvertures de classes et les règles tarifaires pour ne pas canibaliser sa classe affaires avec des passagers pouvant/voulant payer un tarif superieur... et voilà, il y a plus de marge à vendre de la classe affaires bradée que de la classe éco bradée. Ils pourraient aussi mettre en place des surclassements par segment, par exemple CDG NYC, 400 EUR pour eco-affaires, CDG HKG, 600 EUR, etc. Ce qui permettrait à ceux voyageant en éco pour cause de politique voyage entreprise de se payer soit meme son surclassement... et de générer des revenus additionnels, et de rentabiliser sa classe affaires. De plus, je suis à peu près sûr que 76 passagers éco (bagages, sièges, et prestations PNC+repas+boissons+toilettes) ca pèse bien plus que 28 passagers affaires... donc un impact fuel en coût sans doute non négligeable.
Bref, même sans regarder l'histoire du cours de bourse d'AF, rien qu'en voyant les décisions stratégiques prises ces dernières années, je ne voudrais pas être actionnaire d'AF, j'y crois pas. On ne peut pas se réfugier éternellement derrière les cours du pétrole pour couvrir un management peu compétent et une stratégie défaillante.
Si on prend l'exemple du 777-200 d'AF, 28 sièges affaires ont été enlevés pour être remplacés par 76 sièges éco. Donc 1 siège business = 2.7 sièges eco... disons même 3! Si ces sièges éco sont vendus à un tarif promo, on peut considérer un revenu moyen de 250 EUR par segment hors taxes d'aéroport (mais en incluant les surcharges fuel), en prenant 600 EUR TTC avec 100 EUR taxes pour un billet pas cher en éco en moyenne (oui, 600 EUR c'est cher pour NYC mais c'est donné pour Buenos Aires, c'est une moyenne faite à vue de nez). Il faut aussi considérer que pour les billets au départ de province ou d'Europe, une partie du prix total hors taxes doit aussi contribuer au chiffre moyen courrier. C'est je pense à ce yield là, en moyenne, que les sièges éco supplémentaires seront vendus.
Les préstations à bord (repas, boissons, films, cout des sièges) doivent couter 3 fois plus en affaires qu'en éco. Le cout de PNC est aussi similaire: il y a sans doute 2-3 fois plus de PNC par pax en affaires qu'en eco, les PNC AF du forum pourraient donner les chiffres sur un vol plein. Au sol pareil, il y a un cout de salon et d'acces numero 1 supplémentaire mais au niveau de l'enregistrement et de la vente (pour faire des changements, encaisser des excédants bagages, etc.) c'est similaire. Donc au total grosso modo, un cout "sol" 3 fois superieur que pour un passager eco.
Donc si AF vendait en moyenne ses 28 sièges affaires qu'elle considère comme invendable 3 fois plus chers que ce qu'elle pourrait retirer de passagers éco, c'est a dire 750 EUR le segment HT, les couts étant similaires, la marge serait similaire. Et à mon avis, il doit y avoir un énorme marché pour des billets affaires à 1600 EUR aller retour, moyenné sur tout le réseau! Comme la demande devrait être importante, ils pourraient alors augmenter un peu les tarifs, donc vendre plus de billets à 2000 EUR TTC aller retour (toujours en moyenne) en remplissant correctement sa classe affaires. Des contrats entreprises et un peu de yield management pour jouer sur les ouvertures de classes et les règles tarifaires pour ne pas canibaliser sa classe affaires avec des passagers pouvant/voulant payer un tarif superieur... et voilà, il y a plus de marge à vendre de la classe affaires bradée que de la classe éco bradée. Ils pourraient aussi mettre en place des surclassements par segment, par exemple CDG NYC, 400 EUR pour eco-affaires, CDG HKG, 600 EUR, etc. Ce qui permettrait à ceux voyageant en éco pour cause de politique voyage entreprise de se payer soit meme son surclassement... et de générer des revenus additionnels, et de rentabiliser sa classe affaires. De plus, je suis à peu près sûr que 76 passagers éco (bagages, sièges, et prestations PNC+repas+boissons+toilettes) ca pèse bien plus que 28 passagers affaires... donc un impact fuel en coût sans doute non négligeable.
Bref, même sans regarder l'histoire du cours de bourse d'AF, rien qu'en voyant les décisions stratégiques prises ces dernières années, je ne voudrais pas être actionnaire d'AF, j'y crois pas. On ne peut pas se réfugier éternellement derrière les cours du pétrole pour couvrir un management peu compétent et une stratégie défaillante.
Log in first, then come back to this page.
You might also like
More discussions
Hi,
I’m thinking of heading to Malaysia soon.
I’ve seen some great prices and direct flights from Paris with Malaysia Airlines.
Is it a reliable airline?
Thanks for your feedback!
Hello,
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August. My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August. My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Hi there,
We had planned a trip to Sicily in August, and due to the volcanic eruption of Mount Etna, my flight was canceled. The airline is refunding the outbound flight, but none of the non-refundable expenses: accommodation booked through Booking, rental car, and the return flight aren’t covered. My SUPER Gold card doesn’t work in this specific case! :( If anyone has been in this situation, could you let me know if you were able to get any recourse and, if so, how?
Thanks in advance
I’ve been traveling regularly for over twenty years,
but this is the first time an airline has treated me as poorly as Air France.
Two trips, two problems. The latest:
Trip from Seoul to Rennes. Last leg from Paris CDG to Rennes with Air France.
I arrive in Paris and go straight to Air France to get my boarding pass to Rennes. They assure me my baggage is continuing to Rennes.
Arriving in Rennes, no baggage—same as five other people.
The Air France office is closed, and the airport staff tell me there’s rarely anyone there.
With the help of the airport staff, I file a claim online, and my baggage is almost immediately located. As a result, I’m told I’ll have it the next day.
Four days later, the baggage is still in the same place at CDG—nothing’s moving.
The problem is Air France has no customer service. What they call customer service is a department that takes an hour to answer and just repeats what’s on the online form. No coordination, no way to get things moving. I guess Air France would rather pay the compensation after 21 days than actually do something.
I’ve had lost baggage on other trips, but this is the first time I’ve seen such indifference and lack of professionalism.
but this is the first time an airline has treated me as poorly as Air France.
Two trips, two problems. The latest:
Trip from Seoul to Rennes. Last leg from Paris CDG to Rennes with Air France.
I arrive in Paris and go straight to Air France to get my boarding pass to Rennes. They assure me my baggage is continuing to Rennes.
Arriving in Rennes, no baggage—same as five other people.
The Air France office is closed, and the airport staff tell me there’s rarely anyone there.
With the help of the airport staff, I file a claim online, and my baggage is almost immediately located. As a result, I’m told I’ll have it the next day.
Four days later, the baggage is still in the same place at CDG—nothing’s moving.
The problem is Air France has no customer service. What they call customer service is a department that takes an hour to answer and just repeats what’s on the online form. No coordination, no way to get things moving. I guess Air France would rather pay the compensation after 21 days than actually do something.
I’ve had lost baggage on other trips, but this is the first time I’ve seen such indifference and lack of professionalism.
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi,
I booked an Etihad ticket on their website for Dusseldorf-Abu Dhabi. In the first name field, I entered all my first names (something I never do and I regret it, but the site was confusing). Everything is spelled correctly, but the problem is that I just received my new passport and only my first two first names and the first letter of the third appear—there’s no trace of the last one.
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in. Thanks for your feedback!
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in. Thanks for your feedback!
Hi everyone,
Next January, I’m heading to India.
My outbound flight is with Emirates from Paris to Dubai, then another Emirates flight from Dubai to Calcutta.
Could anyone tell me how the connection works? I’ve heard there’s a dedicated Emirates zone, but how does it actually work in practice—I’ve got a 2-hour layover.
Thanks so much!
Take care.
Hi there,
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon. I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport. Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…). AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly. On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double! In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others? Given the price difference, I’m hesitant… Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go? Thanks, HERVE
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon. I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport. Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…). AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly. On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double! In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others? Given the price difference, I’m hesitant… Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go? Thanks, HERVE
Hi everyone, I’ve unfortunately only just noticed that I booked two flight tickets, but I made a mistake on the second first name. Basically, my computer auto-filled and typed my first name twice, so both tickets are in my first name. Only the last names—mine and my friend’s—are correct.
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common). I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common). I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
Hello,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Hi there,
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
Hi,
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
Hi there,
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
Hi,
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
Hi,
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
Hello,
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
Hello,
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Hi everyone,
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
Hi there!
Has anyone taken the direct flight from CDG to Las Vegas with Air France?
Looking forward to your feedback!
Hey everyone,
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
Hi there,
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric
Hi there,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
Hi there,
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry







