Alors voilà, je vous explique ma situation : je pars le 4 janvier prochain pour le Canada, et prix des billets oblige, j'ai un voyage à escales.
Or, j'arrive à Chicago à 14h35 terminal 5 et mon avion pour Toronto repart du terminal 3 à 16h25. Ce qui me laisse 1h50 pour faire le transfert. D'après ce que j'ai lu, ça n'est pas impossible. (n'est ce pas ? )
Cependant, si même avec toute ma bonne volonté je n'arrivais pas à temps pour avoir ma correspondance (trop d'affluence à l'immigration etc ...), que se passe-t-il ? La compagnie doit-elle me faire embarquer sur un avion qui part plus tard ? Ou je devrai-je me débrouiller toute seule pour trouver un autre moyen de rejoindre Toronto ?
Je précise que les deux vols sont sur le même billet, chez British Airways, mais que le vol Chicago Toronto est assuré par American Airlines puisque British Airways n'a pas les autorisations pour opérer les vols Etats-Unis/Canada si j'ai bien compris. (et aussi j'ai acheté le tout sur Govoyages ... je ne sais pas si ça a une influence mais bon on sait jamais !)
Le principal probleme va venir du temps passé à l'immigration. Pour aller souvent à CHICAGO, je dois dire que c'est l'endroit ou j'ai le plus perdu de temps pour les controles.
Il faut etre dans les premiers sortis de l'avion pour ne pas etre englué dans la queue. (Il faudra peut etre signaler votre cas au personnel de bord pour qu'il puisse vs arranger votre transit)
Apres la recup des voyages est rapide, et il y a un metro qui relie le 5 au 3. Ensuite, les formalités au terminal AA sont rapides aussi.
Comme vs avez tout votre voyage sur le meme billet, vs etes normalement redirigé sur l'avion suivant.
Je ne sais pas si un site de compagnie vs aurait vendu un voyage avec si peu de temps d'escale; J'espere que vs avez un bon prix, car à votre place j'aurais pris un vol direct TORONTO, et surtout evité une escale aux USA.
J'ai l'impression que ça va être juste. C'est en effet l'immigration qui pose problème. Je suis déjà resté pendu 2h dans la file d'attente à Chicago. Sachant qu'en prime, nous avions du retard au départ -> connexion manquée. Mais dans ce cas, tu te présentes au comptoir de la compagnie qui te place sur un des vols suivants... dans la mesure ou le retard ne t'est pas imputable.
Bonjour
J'ai mis aussi une fois plus de 2 h pour l'immigration à O'HARE. J'etais au fond de l'avion, et il y a eu 2 autres avions qui etaient arrivés à la meme heure. Pour arranger le tout, j'avais tellement de retard aux tapis bagage que mes valises avaient été enlevées par le personnel.
je me posais exactement les mêmmes questions que toi, et d'après ce que j'ai lu sur les forums il semble que 2h soient vraiment juste pour faire une correspondance avec passage aux services d'immigration et changement de terminal dans l'aéroport o'hare de Chicago.
Mais si ça peut te rassurer j'ai aussi vu pas mal de personnes qui avaient la possibilité d'être placées sur un vol suivant... Il faut juste savoir si le fait d'avoir réservé ton voyage par Govoyage et non directement par la compagnie aérienne te donne le droit d'être placé sur un vol suivant...
Question que je n'ai toujours pas résolu (pour ma part j'ai réservé mon vol sur Opodo)...
Comme il s'agit d'un billet point to point (France - Toronto) avec escale à Chicago, les compagnies aériennes de votre billet ont l'obligation de "garantir" le transfert à O'Hare vers la destination finale.
Garantir est peut être un mot un peu mal choisi, car l'avion American Airlines partira de Chicago sans vous, si vous n'arrivez pas à faire l'escale à temps. Mais British Airways et surtout American Airlines ont l'obligation de vous mettra sur le prochain vol possible vers Toronto une fois vous être prête.
Il va de soi que si le prochain vol pour Toronto est complet et n'a pas de place vous devez attendre votre tour (avec une certaine priorité), mais si une place est disponible - vous allez voyager sans payer un supplément.
Je crois savoir qu'il y ait pas mal de vols entre Chicago et Toronto?
Donc, si votre transfert dure trop longtemps, le mieux est de vous présenter directement à un guichet American Airlines et demander un changement du vol vers Toronto. Normalement votre bagage vous allez déposer sur le tapis d'American Airlines une fois vous avez passé la douane. Mais ils vont retenir votre bagage "en hold" en suivant votre progrès avec les formalités. Donc, lorsque vous changez de vol (prenez un vol plus tard sur Toronto), bien spécifier qu'ils s'occupent de votre bagage (pour le mettre sur le même avion) qui est en attente sur l'aéroport.
J'ajoute à ce que bayrrovoyage a écrit:
Le bagage ne suivra pas nécessairement le même timing que toi... je m'explique: dans mon expérience de connexion ratée à O Hare, je n'avais pas pu prendre le 1er vol suivant, mais le 2eme. Mon bagage est arrivé avant moi à SF, il m'attendait... il avait lui, pris le 1er...
J'ajoute à ce que bayrrovoyage a écrit:
Le bagage ne suivra pas nécessairement le même timing que toi... je m'explique: dans mon expérience de connexion ratée à O Hare, je n'avais pas pu prendre le 1er vol suivant, mais le 2eme. Mon bagage est arrivé avant moi à SF, il m'attendait... il avait lui, pris le 1er...
@+
Bonjour, quand était-ce ? En règle générale les bagages ne voyagent jamais seuls pour des raisons de sécurité et sont retirés de la soute si le PAX ne se présente pas.
En principe les bagages voyageant avec les passagers à bord.
Mais ceci demande une grande discipline de la part des compagnies aériennes.
Et débarquer un bagage au dernier moment d'un passager en retard est une décision difficile.
Car ceci signifie toujours une chose: RETARD.
Donc, beaucoup de compagnies aérienne ne veulent pas attendre et ainsi prennent un risque calculé........
C'est peut etre parce que l'escale à CHICAGO ne correspondait pas à l'entrée sur le territoire US, les bagages n'avaient donc pas à passer à la douane.
Car un bagage qui reste aux Etats-Unis doit passer la douane au chariot du passager en question.
Un bagage qui passe Chicago en-route vers un autre aéroport international fait un autre "chemin" - un chemin direct sans passage via la douane américaine.
Ceci dit, lorsque le passager a passé la douane avec son bagage, et lorsqu'il remet son bagage (avec étiquette) à la compagnie aérienne, il y a une plus grande certitude que le passager fera effectivement la connexion au départ de O'Hare.
Ceci n'est pas du tout le cas pour un bagage direct international - international que passe diretement du vol A vers le vol B.
Comme dit dans mon posting antérieur: ceci demande un plus grand soin de la part des compagnies aériennes - pour faire un état de vol avant le block-off du vol vers le Canada.
Et souvent le délai est pris comme un mal pire que la sécurité.........
Ceci n'est pas du tout le cas pour un bagage direct international - international que passe diretement du vol A vers le vol B.
Est ce que cela veut dire que je n'aurai pas besoin de récupérer ma valise en arrivant à Chicago ? (j'avais cru comprendre qu'il fallait les récupérer pour les mettre sur un tapis "transit" dans tous les cas)
Faire un Transit à n'importe quel aéroport au monde est une chose "très claire".
Faire un Transit International - International aux Etats-Unis est toujours difficile, compliqué et surtout "différent".
Ayant des règles différentes - règles spéciales américaines......
Par exemple impossible faire un transit France - US - Mexique en tant que passager, sans passer la douane américaine. C'est carrément impossible, car les aéroport américains n'ont pas de "Transit Lounges" et pas des facilités à part pour traiter les passagers en Transit (hors pays).
N'importe qui peut entrer dans les Terminaux Internationaux des aéroports américains - sans passer la douane auparavant. Donc, les portes des vols internationaux sont accessible à tout le monde, car il n'y ait pas de séparation stricte entre la partie internationale et la partie domestique aux aéroports américains.
Cette chose est inexistante aux Etats-Unis.
Donc, même sachant qu'en principe le bagage devra passer "directement" sans passer via la Douane, on doit se préparer que le contraire arrivera à Chicago. Mais, je ne suis pas 100% sur.
Je sais juste qu'en principe les aéroports américains n'ont pas de TRANSIT-Facilités comme les autres aéroports internationaux du monde entier. Ceci dit, ils auront peut-être la difficulté de pouvoir identifier un bagage en transit (international) - à le distinguer avec un bagage "domestique" qui embarque des E-U vers le Canada?
Alors, pour se faciliter la vie - ils vont peut être forçer tout le monde à passer la douane avec leur bagages, car ceci "facilite" leur vie et ainsi tous les bagages auront un traitement "égal"?
Pas sûr de la réponse, car je n'ai jamais fait un transit Europe - US -International dans ma vie.
Je sais, il y a beaucoup de questions et pas mal de réponses différentes possibles.
Préparez-vous à tout passer via la Douane à Chicago.....vous et votre bagage.....
Il faudra écouter les annonces faites dans l'avion, et peut-être demander l'hôtesse du vol?
Et je passerai par sécurité via la répération des bagages du vol en question (après le passage du contrôle de douane), juste pour voir et vérifier si votre bagage ne se trouve pas sur la bande?
Au sujet des bagages..
Il est effectivement fort probable que du fait de la short connection, ils ne suivent pas le passager!
Cela m'est arrivé au moins 3 ou 4 fois sur des vols internationaux, y compris aux US. Ils arrivent quelques jours après, ce qui pose probleme si on est déja reparti ailleurs... Galère complète!
Au sujet de short connection...
Si vous loupez la connection, la Cie émettrice du billet (BA dans votre cas, et AA pour le partage de code) sont obligées de vous assurer la continuation le plus rapidement possible, et de subvenir aux frais éventuels.
Que vous ayez acheté le billet directement à la Cie ou par un brooker.
Ceci ne vaut que pour un billet unique. C'est à dire France/Canada via USA.
[
Pas sûr de la réponse, car je n'ai jamais fait un transit Europe - US -International dans ma vie.
Ah bon !
Alors pourquoi vs avez donné une info fausse
[
Pas sûr de la réponse, car je n'ai jamais fait un transit Europe - US -International dans ma vie.
Ah bon !
Alors pourquoi vs avez donné une info fausse
J'ai du mal à comprendre votre affirmation là ? Pourquoi contre (vs) donné une info fausse ? Ça ne veut absolument rien dire, vous pouvez préciser le fond de votre pensée afin que l'on puisse vous répondre ? Merci.
J'ai fait escale en aout 2009 à Chicago au départ de Paris pour aller à SF. Plus de 2h pour passer la douane : correspondance ratée ! L'avion n'était pas parti mais l'embarquement était terminé depuis 2 ou 3 minutes...
Nous avons pris l'avion suivant sans frais supplémentaires, nous avons voyagé sur United et avions pris nous billets sur Opodo. Pas de crainte à avoir, à mon avis c'est très courant !
Je reprends en italique ce qui a été dit dans le message.
Et je le commente pour dire qu'il a donné une reponse fausse sur la maniere dont les bagages sont traités lors d'un transit aux USA.
Pas vraiment, il a émis une hypothèse, hypothèse dont il reconnait lui même ne pas être certain de la validité. C'est différent que de donner sciemment une réponse fausse.
Je voudrais savoir si c'est suffisant 2h30 pour le changement à Chicago pour notre retour
Voilà nos horaires allée je pense qu'il n'y a aucun problème
Lyon départ 9 h arrivée a Munich 10h20 terminal 2
Départ Munich 16h05 terminal 2 arrivée san fransisco 19h
Retour :départ los angeles à 9h arrivée à Chicago 15h03 terminal 1
Départ de Chicago terminal 1 à 17h35 arrivée à Duesseldorf le lendemain à 8h45
Départ de Duesseldorf à 17h10 pour Lyon arrivée 18h35
Merci pour vos réponses
A mon avis vs n'aurez aucun probleme.
Vs arrivez et repartez du même terminal. Vs n'aurez pas à recuperer vos bagages. et les formalités de fouille sont assez rapides à CHICAGO;
Perso, je suis reparti plusieurs fois de O'HARE, et je me compte 2h entre la rstitution de la voiture, l'enregistrement des bagages et les formalites d'embarquement. Et j'ai encore du temps de libre pour trainer dans le terminal (Je vole sur AF et je suis donc dans le T5, ou il n'y a strictement rien à voir ou a faire une fois les controles passés. Je ne connais pas le T1 mais si c'est comme le T5, vs avez interet à prendre un livre😏😏)
Je viens de m'apercevoir que sur mon billet de retour réservé à Lufthansa avec escale à Chicago puis a Düsseldorf
Mon vol est assuré par United airlines (los angeles -Chicago), par lufthansa (chicago - dusseldorf) et par eurowings .(Düsseldorf -Lyon) dois je récupérer mes bagages à chaques escales ? merci pour vos réponses
En règle générale les bagages ne voyagent jamais seuls pour des raisons de sécurité et sont retirés de la soute si le PAX ne se présente pas.
Oui et ... non.😉
Ca depend des cas.
Par exemple, vous enregistrez à CDG mais ne vous présentez pas en porte. Suspicion de bombe et donc bagage débarqué.
Mais si votre bagage ne suit pas lors d'une correspondance, il est mis sur le vol suivant, sans vous à bord, car aucune suspicion sur votre décision de ne pas voyager avec votre bagage.
Si vous ne vous présentez pas en porte à l'occasion d'une escale, bagage débarqué sauf aux US pour les arrivées internationales, pays pourtant paranoïaque en matière de sécurité.
Pour compléter ta réponse, selon le timing et le chargement, on ne mettra pas un avion en retard pour ressortir un sac, si c'est trop galère il restera à bord.
Pour compléter ta réponse, selon le timing et le chargement, on ne mettra pas un avion en retard pour ressortir un sac, si c'est trop galère il restera à bord.
Comme jpg13, j'ai fréquemment vécu la situation où l'avion est parti en retard pour cause de recherche et débarquement des bagages d'un passager en correspondance qui ne s'était pas présenté.
Pareil, le même... 2009
2h45 de queue à l'immigration avec beaucoup de voyageurs qui se trompent de file (pourtant clairement indiqué) et remis dans le droit chemin juste devant nous, 3 gros navions qui atterrissent quasi simultanément, certains voyageurs, stressés, qui demandent à passer devant pour cause de connexion, plus des guichets qui ferment en fin de journée, plus les bagages ôtés du tapis: BREF, un "souk" peu conforme avec le professionnalisme ordinaire; pas de dégâts puisque Chicago était notre destination.
La fois précédente, 45' à peine nous avaient suffit pour les formalités d'entrée.
Désormais, je retiens, pour chaque voyage, la célèbre formule: moins il y a d'escales et plus c'est direct 😎 -- au moins pour l'aller--
Hi there,
I’m planning a winter trip across India. Departing in early December and returning to France in mid-April.
My main concern is finding an airline that offers this round-trip with the fewest hassles regarding cancellations or flight schedule changes. The unstable geopolitical situation in the Middle East isn’t making this search any easier—recent reviews online about airlines from Gulf states describe quite a few struggles over the past few months.
The direct Paris-Delhi round-trip flights offered by Air France or Air India are probably the safest options, but not the cheapest!
Given this uncertainty, I’m still holding off on finalizing my ticket purchase... Maybe some of you India lovers on VoyageForum have tips or experiences to share?
Thanks, and happy travels to all.
Hi everyone,
Next January, I’m heading to India.
My outbound flight is with Emirates from Paris to Dubai, then another Emirates flight from Dubai to Calcutta.
Could anyone tell me how the connection works? I’ve heard there’s a dedicated Emirates zone, but how does it actually work in practice—I’ve got a 2-hour layover.
Thanks so much!
Take care.
Hi everyone,
I’m heading to Madagascar in early October to cycle from Tana to Diego along the east coast.
I really want to visit the Masoala Peninsula and its primary forest. If anyone’s interested, I’m open to company.
Maybe see you soon!
Hi,
I’m thinking of heading to Malaysia soon.
I’ve seen some great prices and direct flights from Paris with Malaysia Airlines.
Is it a reliable airline?
Thanks for your feedback!
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August.
My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Hi there,
We had planned a trip to Sicily in August, and due to the volcanic eruption of Mount Etna, my flight was canceled. The airline is refunding the outbound flight, but none of the non-refundable expenses: accommodation booked through Booking, rental car, and the return flight aren’t covered. My SUPER Gold card doesn’t work in this specific case! :( If anyone has been in this situation, could you let me know if you were able to get any recourse and, if so, how?
Thanks in advance
I’ve been traveling regularly for over twenty years,
but this is the first time an airline has treated me as poorly as Air France.
Two trips, two problems. The latest:
Trip from Seoul to Rennes. Last leg from Paris CDG to Rennes with Air France.
I arrive in Paris and go straight to Air France to get my boarding pass to Rennes. They assure me my baggage is continuing to Rennes.
Arriving in Rennes, no baggage—same as five other people.
The Air France office is closed, and the airport staff tell me there’s rarely anyone there.
With the help of the airport staff, I file a claim online, and my baggage is almost immediately located. As a result, I’m told I’ll have it the next day.
Four days later, the baggage is still in the same place at CDG—nothing’s moving.
The problem is Air France has no customer service. What they call customer service is a department that takes an hour to answer and just repeats what’s on the online form. No coordination, no way to get things moving. I guess Air France would rather pay the compensation after 21 days than actually do something.
I’ve had lost baggage on other trips, but this is the first time I’ve seen such indifference and lack of professionalism.
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi,
I booked an Etihad ticket on their website for Dusseldorf-Abu Dhabi. In the first name field, I entered all my first names (something I never do and I regret it, but the site was confusing). Everything is spelled correctly, but the problem is that I just received my new passport and only my first two first names and the first letter of the third appear—there’s no trace of the last one.
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in.
Thanks for your feedback!
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon.
I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport.
Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…).
AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly.
On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double!
In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others?
Given the price difference, I’m hesitant…
Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go?
Thanks,
HERVE
Hi everyone, I’ve unfortunately only just noticed that I booked two flight tickets, but I made a mistake on the second first name. Basically, my computer auto-filled and typed my first name twice, so both tickets are in my first name. Only the last names—mine and my friend’s—are correct.
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common).
I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows:
- Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes;
- A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late;
- Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens);
- Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight;
- If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation;
- The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason;
- In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/
Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed.
- Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps.
- Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation.
- If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/
- If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed.
- The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt.
- Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont.
- Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia.
Sincerely,
Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding.
Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage...
Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket.
On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata
On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto
I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer.
Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine.
I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket?
(It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania.
The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines.
So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers.
Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this.
Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops.
Do any of you have updates?
Thanks!
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG.
Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover?
We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker).
We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA.
For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai.
Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)?
We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one).
The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much!
I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul?
I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric