Dans la série "n'importe quoi", toujours dans le but de faire des économies (ou augmenter les bénéfices des actionnaires, au choix) Air Canada a décidé de supprimer les gilets de sauvetage sur les vols de sa filiale Air Canada Jazz.
Les passagers auront quand même la chance de pouvoir utiliser à la place... les coussins de leurs sièges qui d'après la direction font très bien l'affaire.
Détails : http://lebuzz.info/2008/08/4568/finis-les-gilets-de-sauvetage-sur-air-canada/
J'ai déjà vu ça sur certaines compagnies, où les assises des sièges se détachent et sont "censés" (jamais essayé) flotter. Mais il me semble qu'il y avait quand même un gilet de sauvetage en plus hein...
moi ca me derange pas qu il n y ait pas de gilet, un coussin fera l affaire.... du moins sur un Paris Toulouse, comme le dit Anne Roumanof. Je me demande le nombre de fois un ou gilet a pu sauver une vie ??? j ai deja vu des passager emporter le gilet pour l utiliser chez eux, et meme en vente dans des vides greniers....
25 kg de moins par vol...... Est-ce vraiment intéressant.
Dans la série "n'importe quoi", toujours dans le but de faire des économies (ou augmenter les bénéfices des actionnaires, au choix) Air Canada a décidé de supprimer les gilets de sauvetage sur les vols de sa filiale Air Canada Jazz.
Les passagers auront quand même la chance de pouvoir utiliser à la place... les coussins de leurs sièges qui d'après la direction font très bien l'affaire.
Détails : http://lebuzz.info/...tage-sur-air-canada/
j ai deja vu des passager emporter le gilet pour l utiliser chez eux
Ils ont raison, ça peut sauver vous sauver la vie... moi je prends jamais un bain à la maison sans gilet de sauvetage à côté ! 😎
Autrement, plus sérieusement, je pense que c'est plus utile de savoir qu'il y a un gilet que le gilet en lui-même. J'aurai été dans le TS236 ça m'aurait je pense un peu rassuré... plus que de me dire : pas de problème, j'ai mon siège !!
Après, on est d'accord, AC Jazz fait des vols continentaux.
L'utilité d'un gillet (fluroescent) pour un Paris-Toulouse, c'est qu'en cas de crash, on vous retrouve plus facilement si vous êtes dans un sapin par exemple.
moi ca me derange pas qu il n y ait pas de gilet, un coussin fera l affaire.... du moins sur un Paris Toulouse, comme le dit Anne Roumanof.
Bonjour,
Une question : Jazz opère-t-elle des vols au dessus de l'eau ?
Rien d'ironique dans la question, mais je me dis qu'en cas de crash terrestre...un gilet sert à quoi ??
Si vous ne réussissez jamais rien du premier coup, n'essayez pas le parachutisme !
Comme le souligne l'article que j'ai mis en lien, ses vols passent au dessus des Grands Lacs. Et comme l'indique thv ça peut aussi servir hors de l'eau.
Mais au final, je pense que les compagnies qui veulent faire des économies dans ce domaine font une erreur et que ça leur retombera tôt ou tard dessus. Au mieux les gens ne voudront plus les prendre les considérant à tort ou à raison comme n'offrant pas toutes les garanties en matière de sécurité (le public est de plus en plus exigeant, voire parano, dans ce domaine), au pire il y aura un accident à cause de cela qui ruinera définitivement l'image de la compagnie concernée.
Mais bon, c'est sûr que les gilets ca a aussi et surtout un but psychologique pour nombre de passagers (d'où l'intérêt peut-être pour les compagnies à ne pas les enlever).
ou plutôt combien d'accidents (ça remonte le pourcentage).
C'est sûr que ca ne demeure que de la "psychologie". Mais comme je disais plus haut, autant faire en sorte que les passagers se sentent en sécurité vu qu'il y a quand même une très grosse majorité de gens qui ne sont pas vraiment à l'aise en l'air.
Le problème c'est que c'est encore le genre de décision qui a dû être prise par des technocrates à la con qui ne voient pas plus loin que le bout de leur bilan comptable à court terme. Et eux la "conséquence psychologique" d'une décision ils ne savent pas ce que c'est... même si au final celle-ci peut avoir l'effet inverse que celui prévu.
Mais au delà de ça c'est surtout que maintenant les compagnies sont prêtes à faire n'importe quoi pour des économies.
Rien de nouveau, hélas, mais la faute à qui ? Ne serait-ce pas par hasard la résultante de cette quête sans fin du billet le moins cher possible de la part de la majorité des passagers potentiels ??
cf le vieil adage : "on n'en a toujours que pour son argent"
Toute chose a un cout ! A commencer par le pétrole : que fait-on pour le plein de la voiture ? on cherche le moins cher des supermarchés.... les Cies aériennes aussi !
Je crois qu'on commencera à redevenir soucieux de sa sécurité quand on refusera d'acheter un voyage dans une agence (même en ligne...) quand la Cie proposée ne convient pas !
J'ai ma propre liste de Cies sur lesquelles je ne voyagerai jamais, avec ou sans gilet de sauvetage ! Et si cela implique l'impossibilité d'aller dans un pays, faute d'autre solution même plus chère, eh bien je ne vais pas dans ce pays, c'est tout simple !
Si vous ne réussissez jamais rien du premier coup, n'essayez pas le parachutisme !
"Rien de nouveau, hélas, mais la faute à qui ? Ne serait-ce pas par hasard la résultante de cette quête sans fin du billet le moins cher possible de la part de la majorité des passagers potentiels ??"
Oui ; et du plus gros dividende de la part des actionnaires .... Parfois, ce sont les mêmes ... 🙂
Rien de nouveau, hélas, mais la faute à qui ? Ne serait-ce pas par hasard la résultante de cette quête sans fin du billet le moins cher possible de la part de la majorité des passagers potentiels ??
Je ne pense pas que l'idée de proposer toujours "le moins cher possible" aux passagers soit la raisons première (même si...). Par contre la nécessité de satisfaire les gros actionnaires l'est sans aucun doute.
Un retour sur investissement de 15% par an pour ceux-ci (taux généralement pratiqué) nécessite en gros une croissance moyenne de 10% par an pour les entreprises. Donc, par rapport à cela, celles-ci se trouvent bien coincées quand le système se détraque (augmentation du prix du pétrole par exemple, baisse du trafic, etc, dans le cas des compagnies). D'où leur politique d'économies à tout va.
On est bien loin du souci des passagers...
Tiens leader cheap, l'adepte de la First et et de la Biz, est de retour...
J'aime bien lire tes posts ça me fait rigoler. Mention spéciale pour "car en avion ce qui as de plus chiant c'est les bébés, si on choisi de voyager en P ou en J, c'est aussi pour etre au calme".
Mais vous aussi vous me faites bien rire, avec votre lutte des classes: hommes d'affaires, actionnaires, PDG, rentiers et technocrates, pour vous ce sont tous des abrutis cf:
"Pour avoir fréquenté à quelques occasions la classe affaires et les grands hôtels, j'ai trouvé que la proportion d'abrutis y était plus importante qu'aux niveaux en dessous..."
C'est étonnant tout de même, les personnes qui ont le mieux réussi professionnellement, qui ont fait de grande études et qui ont un métier avec suffisamment de responsabilités pour voyager sont forcement plus ABRUTIS que les smicards, éboueurs, caissières, et femme de ménages qui n’ont de qualification que le BAC – 3.
Alors oui, ces ABRUTIS sont peut être condescendants, excessifs et penses que tout leur est du, mais eux ils ont suffisamment travaillé pour se le permettre (mais ils ne sont pas tous comme ça).
Et à l'avenir, evitez d'ecorcher mon pseudo, c'est un manque de respect, et evitez aussi de tirer des conclusions attives sur moi ;)
Mes vidéos de vols sur Vimeo
Ma carte de voyage sur Openflights
Et à l'avenir, evitez d'ecorcher mon pseudo, c'est un manque de respect,
Bonsoir,
Vous êtes vraiment gonflé !
Comment pouvez-vous reprocher à un membre de vous manquer de respect (et franchement, vous êtes plus que cheap) quand vous-même écrivez que : "C'est étonnant tout de même, les personnes qui ont le mieux réussi professionnellement, qui ont fait de grande études et qui ont un métier avec suffisamment de responsabilités pour voyager sont forcement plus ABRUTIS que les smicards, éboueurs, caissières, et femme de ménages qui n’ont de qualification que le BAC – 3."
Quel signe de réussite dans la vie que de voler en classe Affaires ! Je suppose que vous rampez devant ceux qui sont en 1ère ? Belle échelle de valeurs ...
Danielle
A man, a plan, a canal, Panama - palindrome, auteur inconnu
Et à l'avenir, evitez d'ecorcher mon pseudo, c'est un manque de respect,
Bonsoir,
Vous êtes vraiment gonflé !
Comment pouvez-vous reprocher à un membre de vous manquer de respect (et franchement, vous êtes plus que cheap) quand vous-même écrivez que : "C'est étonnant tout de même, les personnes qui ont le mieux réussi professionnellement, qui ont fait de grande études et qui ont un métier avec suffisamment de responsabilités pour voyager sont forcement plus ABRUTIS que les smicards, éboueurs, caissières, et femme de ménages qui n’ont de qualification que le BAC – 3."
Quel signe de réussite dans la vie que de voler en classe Affaires ! Je suppose que vous rampez devant ceux qui sont en 1ère ? Belle échelle de valeurs ...
Danielle
Je ne manque de respect à personne, je fait juste remarqué à Much (et en caricaturant certe) que qualifier les hommes d'affaires d'abrutis n'est pas correct et absolument injustifié.
Et oui j'estime que voyager en classe affaires c'est un signe de reussite professionelle et je ne vois pas qui pourra dire le contraire!
Mes vidéos de vols sur Vimeo
Ma carte de voyage sur Openflights
"C'est étonnant tout de même, les personnes qui ont le mieux réussi professionnellement, qui ont fait de grande études et qui ont un métier avec suffisamment de responsabilités pour voyager sont forcement plus ABRUTIS que les smicards, éboueurs, caissières, et femme de ménages qui n’ont de qualification que le BAC – 3.
Alors oui, ces ABRUTIS sont peut être condescendants, excessifs et penses que tout leur est du, mais eux ils ont suffisamment travaillé pour se le permettre (mais ils ne sont pas tous comme ça)."
Oui, oui.....
Peut-être.....
De plus en plus il y a tout de même beaucoup de nouveaux riches, très incultes, sans études, mais qui se sont trouvés au bon endroit au bon moment, ou qui ont su trafiquer comme il fallait. C'est observation surtout valable en Europe de l'Est, au Proche Orient....
J'admire que tu puisses lier au niveau d'étude ou aux revenus le fait d'être ou non un abruti ; personnellement je ne vois pas un déterminisme si net.
> Et oui j'estime que voyager en classe affaires c'est un signe de reussite professionelle et je ne vois pas qui pourra dire le contraire!
Leader chips adepte des apparences, remarque quand on lit tes posts on s'en doute...
> Alors oui, ces ABRUTIS sont peut être condescendants, excessifs et penses que tout leur est du, mais eux ils ont suffisamment travaillé pour se le permettre (mais ils ne sont pas tous comme ça).
Bref, je suis con mais j'ai travaillé dur pour y arriver.
... Je ne pense pas que l'idée de proposer toujours "le moins cher possible" aux passagers soit la raisons première (même si...). Par contre la nécessité de satisfaire les gros actionnaires l'est sans aucun doute.
Un retour sur investissement de 15% par an pour ceux-ci (taux généralement pratiqué) nécessite en gros une croissance moyenne de 10% par an pour les entreprises...
Et sous un "rendement" a 2 chiffres les investisseurs de type fonds de pensions ou autres degagent vers d'autres cieux .... les $$$ se "baladent" facile en 2 ou 3 clicks et ils passent d'Europe en Asie ou ....
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Facile de blâmer les compagnies aériennes de vouloir faire des économies... Il a été prouvé que pour 5$cad (3 euros) moins cher, 95% des clients iront vers le moins cher, donc à qui la faute? En passant, une cie aérienne qui fait 10% de profit est un succes story, dans n'importe quel autre domaine avec un rendement aussi fable on serait en mode restructuration avec suppressions d'emplois
"Il a été prouvé que pour 5$cad (3 euros) moins cher, 95% des clients iront vers le moins cher, donc à qui la faute?"
Prouvé par qui ?
C'est vraiment facile de faire porter le chapeau aux passagers et aux clients ; de toutes façons, leur éventuel civisme à aller vers autre chose que le moins cher ne limiterait la rapacité des actionnaires.
Et oui j'estime que voyager en classe affaires c'est un signe de reussite professionelle et je ne vois pas qui pourra dire le contraire!
Non c'est lié au simple fait que le billet a été payé. Bien que déja évoqué ci-dessus j'avoue avoir été assez stupéfait de lire voici quelques mois en votre réponse à Poséidon votre prose :
Pas cool, mais je les comprends, car en avion ce qui as de plus chiant c'est les bébés, si on choisi de voyager en P ou en J, c'est aussi pour etre au calme
😉 Les gilets ont servis hier sur un vol privé Ajaccio/Cannes, 6 personnes à la mer suite à un incident technique, le zing s'est vautré à 8 km des côtes Corses.
🙂 Les 6 passagers ont étés retrouvés la nuit aprés étre restés 7 heures dans la mer avec des vagues de 6 m.
😏 Bravo à la marine et aux secours.
🤪 Par contre leur utilité sur le vol d'une compagnie nationale de Rio à Paris, ne s'est pas montré d'une grande efficacité. Alors que les Américains amerris dans l'Hudson s'en sont servis et sont utilisation à permis aux passagers d'attendre calmement les secours
😐 Tout est relatif dans ces accidents, et les conséquences selon le lieu, les conditions météo, et surtout des impondérables totalements aléatoires, seront soit des miracles ou des catastrophes, ceci malgré tous les tests effectués, les modélisations et autres essais, personne ne pourra gérer ni même anticiper.
La compagnie aérienne Swiss, filiale du Lufthansa Group, va mettre fin aux liaisons aériennes de/vers l'aéroport de Lugano, suite a la faillite de la compagnie…
Ce que je craignais avec la nouvelle direction est arrivé, Air Austral va supprimer l'ensemble de ses vols vers Bordeaux, Lyon, Marseille, Nantes et Toulouse…
Hi,
I’m thinking of heading to Malaysia soon.
I’ve seen some great prices and direct flights from Paris with Malaysia Airlines.
Is it a reliable airline?
Thanks for your feedback!
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August.
My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Hi there,
We had planned a trip to Sicily in August, and due to the volcanic eruption of Mount Etna, my flight was canceled. The airline is refunding the outbound flight, but none of the non-refundable expenses: accommodation booked through Booking, rental car, and the return flight aren’t covered. My SUPER Gold card doesn’t work in this specific case! :( If anyone has been in this situation, could you let me know if you were able to get any recourse and, if so, how?
Thanks in advance
I’ve been traveling regularly for over twenty years,
but this is the first time an airline has treated me as poorly as Air France.
Two trips, two problems. The latest:
Trip from Seoul to Rennes. Last leg from Paris CDG to Rennes with Air France.
I arrive in Paris and go straight to Air France to get my boarding pass to Rennes. They assure me my baggage is continuing to Rennes.
Arriving in Rennes, no baggage—same as five other people.
The Air France office is closed, and the airport staff tell me there’s rarely anyone there.
With the help of the airport staff, I file a claim online, and my baggage is almost immediately located. As a result, I’m told I’ll have it the next day.
Four days later, the baggage is still in the same place at CDG—nothing’s moving.
The problem is Air France has no customer service. What they call customer service is a department that takes an hour to answer and just repeats what’s on the online form. No coordination, no way to get things moving. I guess Air France would rather pay the compensation after 21 days than actually do something.
I’ve had lost baggage on other trips, but this is the first time I’ve seen such indifference and lack of professionalism.
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi,
I booked an Etihad ticket on their website for Dusseldorf-Abu Dhabi. In the first name field, I entered all my first names (something I never do and I regret it, but the site was confusing). Everything is spelled correctly, but the problem is that I just received my new passport and only my first two first names and the first letter of the third appear—there’s no trace of the last one.
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in.
Thanks for your feedback!
Hi everyone,
Next January, I’m heading to India.
My outbound flight is with Emirates from Paris to Dubai, then another Emirates flight from Dubai to Calcutta.
Could anyone tell me how the connection works? I’ve heard there’s a dedicated Emirates zone, but how does it actually work in practice—I’ve got a 2-hour layover.
Thanks so much!
Take care.
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon.
I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport.
Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…).
AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly.
On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double!
In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others?
Given the price difference, I’m hesitant…
Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go?
Thanks,
HERVE
Hi everyone, I’ve unfortunately only just noticed that I booked two flight tickets, but I made a mistake on the second first name. Basically, my computer auto-filled and typed my first name twice, so both tickets are in my first name. Only the last names—mine and my friend’s—are correct.
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common).
I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows:
- Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes;
- A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late;
- Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens);
- Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight;
- If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation;
- The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason;
- In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/
Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed.
- Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps.
- Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation.
- If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/
- If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed.
- The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt.
- Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont.
- Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia.
Sincerely,
Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding.
Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage...
Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket.
On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata
On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto
I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer.
Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine.
I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket?
(It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania.
The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines.
So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers.
Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this.
Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops.
Do any of you have updates?
Thanks!
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG.
Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover?
We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker).
We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA.
For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai.
Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)?
We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one).
The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much!
I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul?
I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace.
It’s this model:
https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date."
See the photo.
Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?