Incident sur le système de conditionnement d'air d'un A330 chez Air France
by Flyer
This discussion is in French, the community’s main language.
Original post
PARIS - Un incident sur le système de conditionnement d'air d'un A330 d'Air France qui avait décollé jeudi de Paris vers Douala, au Cameroun, a contraint l'équipage à rebrousser chemin, apprend-on auprès de la compagnie.
L'Express 31/07
Rien de plus que d'habitude, rien de plus que chez les autres. Les médias jouent simplement toujours sur la psychose Air France / Airbus A330 depuis 2 mois maintenant.
Contributions CC BY-SA
OUI hélas c pas fini, cette "info" je l'avais mise sur le post des sondes pitot plus bas dans la rubrique... et il yen a d'autre petits soucis sur un autre vol le 30 juillet encore en afrique, une aile qui a été éraflé lors du frolement d'un bâtiment après l'atterissage encore d'un airbus d'air france... slasherfun et d'autres membres ont raison ils font une fixation sur AF et airbus en ce moment.. bientôt ils vont nous faire un article quand un wc sera bouché dans un airbus!!!! ça leur passera . Le principal c'est que l'on nous annonce pas encore une catastrophe aérienne dramatique
Alors que par exemple, pas plus tard qu'avant-hier, un 77E (B777-200ER) AF (Air France) a connu des problèmes hydrauliques lors de son approche à YUL (Montréal Trudeau), bah personne n'en a parlé (et heureusement) parce que bah c'est du Boeing.
(J'ai les enregistrements ATC si ça intéresse quelqu'un 🙂)
Contributions CC BY-SA
Il me semble que la "scoumoune Boeing" de 2008 avait donné lieu à moins de commentaires dans les media? Qu'en était-il (et qu'en est-il aujourd'hui) à l'étranger?
Aux USA sur les médias que je regarde ils n'en parlent pas. Sérieux, tout le monde s'en fout de savoir que un A330-200 de AF sur la route CDG-DLA a fait demi-tour pour un probleme de pressu. L'essentiel est que tout le monde soit arrive sauf et que AF ait achemine ses passagers a DLA. Le reste ce sont des palabres inutiles. D'ailleurs si ça intéresse quelqu'un, faut que je change l'huile de la PT Cruiser. Saloperies de Chrysler...
Aux USA sur les médias que je regarde ils n'en parlent pas. Sérieux, tout le monde s'en fout de savoir que un A330-200 de AF sur la route CDG-DLA a fait demi-tour pour un probleme de pressu. L'essentiel est que tout le monde soit arrive sauf et que AF ait achemine ses passagers a DLA. Le reste ce sont des palabres inutiles. D'ailleurs si ça intéresse quelqu'un, faut que je change l'huile de la PT Cruiser. Saloperies de Chrysler...
le 30 juillet encore en afrique, une aile qui a été éraflé lors du frolement d'un bâtiment après l'atterissage
Le 'en afrique', c'est à Brazza (BZV), le 29 juillet au soir (pas le 30); F-GZCL a "gratté" du bout du winglet un des hangars autour du parking pendant sa manoeuvre de stationnement. À BZV cette manoeuvre est d'ailleurs assez tordue et le parking assez "congestionné".
Les autorités congolaises ayant interdit à l'appareil de repartir 3h plus tard pour assurer le vol BZV-CDG par mesures de sécurité (puisque comme chacun sait, les compagnies aériennes congolaises sont les parangons de la sécurité), F-GZCL est remonté sur CDG sans pax et sans problème.
Le 'en afrique', c'est à Brazza (BZV), le 29 juillet au soir (pas le 30); F-GZCL a "gratté" du bout du winglet un des hangars autour du parking pendant sa manoeuvre de stationnement. À BZV cette manoeuvre est d'ailleurs assez tordue et le parking assez "congestionné".
Les autorités congolaises ayant interdit à l'appareil de repartir 3h plus tard pour assurer le vol BZV-CDG par mesures de sécurité (puisque comme chacun sait, les compagnies aériennes congolaises sont les parangons de la sécurité), F-GZCL est remonté sur CDG sans pax et sans problème.
Rien de plus que d'habitude, rien de plus que chez les autres. Les médias jouent simplement toujours sur la psychose Air France / Airbus A330 depuis 2 mois maintenant.
je suis généralement tout à fait d'accord avec ce raisonnement, mais avouons que Air France les accumule en ce moment... 🤪
je suis généralement tout à fait d'accord avec ce raisonnement, mais avouons que Air France les accumule en ce moment... 🤪
Il n'y a pas de problème sans solution... et si il n'y a pas de solution, il n'y a pas de problème !
Du tout. C'est juste le fait que les médias en parlent qui te donne cette impression.
Contributions CC BY-SA
Du tout. C'est juste le fait que les médias en parlent qui te donne cette impression.
mais bien sûr que si...
si tu suit des forums internet, tu verra que de ombreux pb avec des avions AF sont reportés, plus que la normale
je veux bien être anti média, mais il faut unpeu de recul parfois😉
mais bien sûr que si...
si tu suit des forums internet, tu verra que de ombreux pb avec des avions AF sont reportés, plus que la normale
je veux bien être anti média, mais il faut unpeu de recul parfois😉
Il n'y a pas de problème sans solution... et si il n'y a pas de solution, il n'y a pas de problème !
de ombreux pb avec des avions AF sont reportés, plus que la normale
Tout est dit.
Tout est dit.
Contributions CC BY-SA
de ombreux pb avec des avions AF sont reportés, plus que la normale
Tout est dit.
tu auras compris que je ne parle pas des médias mais de forum spécialsiés qui n'ont aucun parti pris ni aucune volonté de sensationnalisme
Tout est dit.
tu auras compris que je ne parle pas des médias mais de forum spécialsiés qui n'ont aucun parti pris ni aucune volonté de sensationnalisme
Il n'y a pas de problème sans solution... et si il n'y a pas de solution, il n'y a pas de problème !
mais bien sûr que si...
si tu suit des forums internet, tu verra que de ombreux pb avec des avions AF sont reportés, plus que la normale
je veux bien être anti média, mais il faut unpeu de recul parfois😉
Ben justement, prends-en un peu de recul, avant de donner des leçons à tout le monde. L'explication est simple : les journalistes découvrent que l'exploitation d'avions n'est pas une exploitation de poireaux ou un boulot de pisse-froid ou de gratte-papier : 250 machines complexes et 1200 vols par jour, tous, absolument tous étant dépouillés pour analyse, forcément, on découvre au jour les jour des problèmes mécaniques sur de nombreux vols. C'est parfaitement normal. Toutes les compagnies connaissent des incidents mineurs dans leurs exploitations, vue la complexité des machines utilisées. Les pilotes savent traiter les problèmes qui apparaissent de ci de là, et heureusement, on ne les cite pas tous les soirs au 20 heures de TF1, sinon, je peux garantir qu'il faudrait y passer la nuit, tous les soirs ! Dans 99% des cas, tout se passe sans qu'aucun passager ne soit au courant de rien.
Ce qui arrive en ce moment est parfaitement ridicule et illustre bien le niveau des journalistes que nous avons : on assiste à une frénésie médiatique anti-Air France (car en France, il est de bon ton de critiquer ce que l'on sait faire ou ce que l'on a de bien : (le nucléaire, Total et ses milliards, enfin bref, j'en passe). Ca fait parler dans les chaumières et surtout aux deux magots ou au Flore à Saint Germain des prés. Mais on est bien loin de la débâcle que semble décrire ces nabots à la plume moins prolixe quand il s'agit de parler du fond. De la réalité.
Arrêtons un peu de relayer ces imbéciles qui ne connaissent rien à rien et, pis, qui ne cherchent surtout pas à connaître, ils ne pourraient plus rien raconter.
Vivement la prochaine fillete mordue par un teckel, comme ça, pendant 2 mois, on aura toutes les morsures de clébards de France et de Navarre au 20 heures tous les soirs, puis la polémique sur les chiens dangereux, puis les nouvelles lois anti-chiens-qui-mordent et anti-cons qui les dressent comme des cons, puis les singes mago et bonobo dans les cités et alors peut-être qu'enfin on foutra la paix aux gens qui bossent (mais eux pour de vrai, donc tout le monde s'en fout) dans les avions et ailleurs pour la sécurité de tous.
si tu suit des forums internet, tu verra que de ombreux pb avec des avions AF sont reportés, plus que la normale
je veux bien être anti média, mais il faut unpeu de recul parfois😉
Ben justement, prends-en un peu de recul, avant de donner des leçons à tout le monde. L'explication est simple : les journalistes découvrent que l'exploitation d'avions n'est pas une exploitation de poireaux ou un boulot de pisse-froid ou de gratte-papier : 250 machines complexes et 1200 vols par jour, tous, absolument tous étant dépouillés pour analyse, forcément, on découvre au jour les jour des problèmes mécaniques sur de nombreux vols. C'est parfaitement normal. Toutes les compagnies connaissent des incidents mineurs dans leurs exploitations, vue la complexité des machines utilisées. Les pilotes savent traiter les problèmes qui apparaissent de ci de là, et heureusement, on ne les cite pas tous les soirs au 20 heures de TF1, sinon, je peux garantir qu'il faudrait y passer la nuit, tous les soirs ! Dans 99% des cas, tout se passe sans qu'aucun passager ne soit au courant de rien.
Ce qui arrive en ce moment est parfaitement ridicule et illustre bien le niveau des journalistes que nous avons : on assiste à une frénésie médiatique anti-Air France (car en France, il est de bon ton de critiquer ce que l'on sait faire ou ce que l'on a de bien : (le nucléaire, Total et ses milliards, enfin bref, j'en passe). Ca fait parler dans les chaumières et surtout aux deux magots ou au Flore à Saint Germain des prés. Mais on est bien loin de la débâcle que semble décrire ces nabots à la plume moins prolixe quand il s'agit de parler du fond. De la réalité.
Arrêtons un peu de relayer ces imbéciles qui ne connaissent rien à rien et, pis, qui ne cherchent surtout pas à connaître, ils ne pourraient plus rien raconter.
Vivement la prochaine fillete mordue par un teckel, comme ça, pendant 2 mois, on aura toutes les morsures de clébards de France et de Navarre au 20 heures tous les soirs, puis la polémique sur les chiens dangereux, puis les nouvelles lois anti-chiens-qui-mordent et anti-cons qui les dressent comme des cons, puis les singes mago et bonobo dans les cités et alors peut-être qu'enfin on foutra la paix aux gens qui bossent (mais eux pour de vrai, donc tout le monde s'en fout) dans les avions et ailleurs pour la sécurité de tous.
(...)
Arrêtons un peu de relayer ces imbéciles qui ne connaissent rien à rien et, pis, qui ne cherchent surtout pas à connaître, ils ne pourraient plus rien raconter.
Vivement la prochaine fillete mordue par un teckel, comme ça, pendant 2 mois, on aura toutes les morsures de clébards de France et de Navarre au 20 heures tous les soirs, puis la polémique sur les chiens dangereux, puis les nouvelles lois anti-chiens-qui-mordent et anti-cons qui les dressent comme des cons, puis les singes mago et bonobo dans les cités et alors peut-être qu'enfin on foutra la paix aux gens qui bossent (mais eux pour de vrai, donc tout le monde s'en fout) dans les avions et ailleurs pour la sécurité de tous.
Je suis entièrement d'accord avec toi. Ces indicents sont montes en epingle par des journalistes en manque de chose a dire. On peut parier que après le chasse-croise de ce week-end nous aurons des avis sur: - la raison de la mortalité plus importante que l'année dernière a la même époque et la manière dont le gouvernement compte enrayer le fléau de la délinquance routière, OU - les bonnes mesures gouvernementales qui ont permis a la mortalité de chuter.
Ils laisseront durant 2 ou 3 jours tranquilles les avions équipés de sondes pitot ;)
Arrêtons un peu de relayer ces imbéciles qui ne connaissent rien à rien et, pis, qui ne cherchent surtout pas à connaître, ils ne pourraient plus rien raconter.
Vivement la prochaine fillete mordue par un teckel, comme ça, pendant 2 mois, on aura toutes les morsures de clébards de France et de Navarre au 20 heures tous les soirs, puis la polémique sur les chiens dangereux, puis les nouvelles lois anti-chiens-qui-mordent et anti-cons qui les dressent comme des cons, puis les singes mago et bonobo dans les cités et alors peut-être qu'enfin on foutra la paix aux gens qui bossent (mais eux pour de vrai, donc tout le monde s'en fout) dans les avions et ailleurs pour la sécurité de tous.
Je suis entièrement d'accord avec toi. Ces indicents sont montes en epingle par des journalistes en manque de chose a dire. On peut parier que après le chasse-croise de ce week-end nous aurons des avis sur: - la raison de la mortalité plus importante que l'année dernière a la même époque et la manière dont le gouvernement compte enrayer le fléau de la délinquance routière, OU - les bonnes mesures gouvernementales qui ont permis a la mortalité de chuter.
Ils laisseront durant 2 ou 3 jours tranquilles les avions équipés de sondes pitot ;)
il faut garder son calme : la responsabilité incombe aussi à la communication AF.
Lorsque SQ éclate un parebrise sur l'A380 ou atterrit d'urgence avec un 77W à cause d'un problème moteur, la compagnie communique immédiatement en toute transparence.
AF a tendance à se contenter d'un communiqué lapidaire et évasif parlant de problèmes techniques.
Nous sommes dans une société de l'information où tout est relayé en quelques minutes, alors plutôt que de laisser des interprétations douteuses naître mieux vaut communiquer clairement.
AF a tendance à se contenter d'un communiqué lapidaire et évasif parlant de problèmes techniques.
Nous sommes dans une société de l'information où tout est relayé en quelques minutes, alors plutôt que de laisser des interprétations douteuses naître mieux vaut communiquer clairement.
il faut garder son calme : la responsabilité incombe aussi à la communication AF.
Lorsque SQ éclate un parebrise sur l'A380 ou atterrit d'urgence avec un 77W à cause d'un problème moteur, la compagnie communique immédiatement en toute transparence.
AF a tendance à se contenter d'un communiqué lapidaire et évasif parlant de problèmes techniques.
Nous sommes dans une société de l'information où tout est relayé en quelques minutes, alors plutôt que de laisser des interprétations douteuses naître mieux vaut communiquer clairement.
Oui mais non. Qu'est-ce ça apporte de savoir qu'un avion a fait demi-tour hier ? D'autant plus que si on regarde dans le monde je suis sur que ce jour la ça a pas été le seul avion a faire demi tour ou qu'il a du y avoir des rdg quelque part dans le monde. Alors soit les journaleux sont objectifs et tous les soirs on a la liste des incidents émaillant le transport aérien dans le monde entier soit alors ils se taisent sur ce genre d'incident.
M'enfin, est-ce que la RATP communique sur tous les pneu de ses bus qui crèvent ? Pourtant ça apporterait autant de savoir que hier un pneu a éclaté sur la ligne 286 que de savoir qu'un avion a un problème de pressu en partant vers DLA.
AF a tendance à se contenter d'un communiqué lapidaire et évasif parlant de problèmes techniques.
Nous sommes dans une société de l'information où tout est relayé en quelques minutes, alors plutôt que de laisser des interprétations douteuses naître mieux vaut communiquer clairement.
Oui mais non. Qu'est-ce ça apporte de savoir qu'un avion a fait demi-tour hier ? D'autant plus que si on regarde dans le monde je suis sur que ce jour la ça a pas été le seul avion a faire demi tour ou qu'il a du y avoir des rdg quelque part dans le monde. Alors soit les journaleux sont objectifs et tous les soirs on a la liste des incidents émaillant le transport aérien dans le monde entier soit alors ils se taisent sur ce genre d'incident.
M'enfin, est-ce que la RATP communique sur tous les pneu de ses bus qui crèvent ? Pourtant ça apporterait autant de savoir que hier un pneu a éclaté sur la ligne 286 que de savoir qu'un avion a un problème de pressu en partant vers DLA.
Les autorités congolaises ayant interdit à l'appareil de repartir 3h plus tard pour assurer le vol BZV-CDG par mesures de sécurité (puisque comme chacun sait, les compagnies aériennes congolaises sont les parangons de la sécurité),
En la matière, je dois humblement reconnaître, à la lumière des réactions officielles de ces derniers mois, que les autorités françaises auraient été capables de pareille bêtise.
En la matière, je dois humblement reconnaître, à la lumière des réactions officielles de ces derniers mois, que les autorités françaises auraient été capables de pareille bêtise.
M'enfin, est-ce que la RATP communique sur tous les pneu de ses bus qui crèvent ? Pourtant ça apporterait autant de savoir que hier un pneu a éclaté sur la ligne 286 que de savoir qu'un avion a un problème de pressu en partant vers DLA.
La RATP aurait eu un accident mortel suite à l'éclatement d'un pneu il y a deux mois le moindre éclatement de pneu ferait l'objet d'une couverture médiatique.
Qantas l'an dernier a également ét�� victime de plusieurs incidents sérieux et a fait l'objet d'un attention accrue des médias.
Personnellement l'aérien me passionne plus que la RATP mais je comprends que chacun ait des plaisirs différents 😎
La RATP aurait eu un accident mortel suite à l'éclatement d'un pneu il y a deux mois le moindre éclatement de pneu ferait l'objet d'une couverture médiatique.
Qantas l'an dernier a également ét�� victime de plusieurs incidents sérieux et a fait l'objet d'un attention accrue des médias.
Personnellement l'aérien me passionne plus que la RATP mais je comprends que chacun ait des plaisirs différents 😎
La RATP aurait eu un accident mortel suite à l'éclatement d'un pneu il y a deux mois le moindre éclatement de pneu ferait l'objet d'une couverture médiatique.
Quand un bus articulé de la ligne PC2 a heurté un arbre quasiment de face à 50 km/h l'année dernière (avec passagers), on a pas fait un foin sur les incidents qui survenaient ensuite...
Quand un bus articulé de la ligne PC2 a heurté un arbre quasiment de face à 50 km/h l'année dernière (avec passagers), on a pas fait un foin sur les incidents qui survenaient ensuite...
Contributions CC BY-SA
Qantas l'an dernier a également été victime de plusieurs incidents sérieux et a fait l'objet d'un attention accrue des médias
L'attention " accrue " des media les avait d'ailleurs amené au ridicule absolu ( après la dépressurisation de l'accident initial du 747 de QANTAS ) . En effet les média avaient exposé quelques jours après qu'un autre appareil QANTAS avait eu une porte qui s'ouvrait en vol et que l'appareil avait du se reposer . Les journalistes avaient mélangé " gear door " ( trappe de train ) et " cabin door " ( porte de cabine ) transformant une fois de plus un " non évènement " ( trappe qui ne se referme pas après la rentrée du train d'atterrissage ) sans aucune gravité en une histoire absurde pour faire frémir d'horreur lecteurs et téléspectateurs sans doute . Bonne soirée .
L'attention " accrue " des media les avait d'ailleurs amené au ridicule absolu ( après la dépressurisation de l'accident initial du 747 de QANTAS ) . En effet les média avaient exposé quelques jours après qu'un autre appareil QANTAS avait eu une porte qui s'ouvrait en vol et que l'appareil avait du se reposer . Les journalistes avaient mélangé " gear door " ( trappe de train ) et " cabin door " ( porte de cabine ) transformant une fois de plus un " non évènement " ( trappe qui ne se referme pas après la rentrée du train d'atterrissage ) sans aucune gravité en une histoire absurde pour faire frémir d'horreur lecteurs et téléspectateurs sans doute . Bonne soirée .
Étant de montréal, je suis plutôt curieux de savoir ce s'est passé avec le 777 d'AF. slasherfun si tu as des infos...l'actualité aérienne Montréalaise est plutôt vide habituellement...
merci
merci
...tu auras compris que je ne parle pas des médias mais de forum spécialsiés qui n'ont aucun parti pris ni aucune volonté de sensationnalisme...
Je ne pense pas que les medias, pas plus que les personnes qui écrivent sur ces forums ne soient de parti pris (du moins pas tous 😉) Simplement, il y a des sujets à la mode dont les gens parlent à un moment et pas à un autre.
En soi, ce n'est pas un problème...sauf quand ceux qui les lisent ou les écoutent jugent l'importance ou la fréquence d'un phénomène au fait qu'il soit beaucoup reporté en peu de temps.
Lorsque des proches abordent ce sujet avec moi, je réponds (presque sérieusement). "Mais oui, tu as raison. En ce moment, je ne prends que la voiture, c'est le moyen de transport le plus sécuritaire. Depuis combien de temps n'ont-ils pas parlé d'un accident de voiture mortel aux infos ? Alors que des pbs avec des avions il y en a plein en ce moment" 😛
Toutes ces fausses informations (et ce post en est une), c'est ce que j'appelle de la désinformation !
Je ne pense pas que les medias, pas plus que les personnes qui écrivent sur ces forums ne soient de parti pris (du moins pas tous 😉) Simplement, il y a des sujets à la mode dont les gens parlent à un moment et pas à un autre.
En soi, ce n'est pas un problème...sauf quand ceux qui les lisent ou les écoutent jugent l'importance ou la fréquence d'un phénomène au fait qu'il soit beaucoup reporté en peu de temps.
Lorsque des proches abordent ce sujet avec moi, je réponds (presque sérieusement). "Mais oui, tu as raison. En ce moment, je ne prends que la voiture, c'est le moyen de transport le plus sécuritaire. Depuis combien de temps n'ont-ils pas parlé d'un accident de voiture mortel aux infos ? Alors que des pbs avec des avions il y en a plein en ce moment" 😛
Toutes ces fausses informations (et ce post en est une), c'est ce que j'appelle de la désinformation !
Thierry
On dit souvent "Fermez la porte, il fait froid dehors !" Mais une fois la porte fermée, il fait toujours aussi froid dehors.
On dit souvent "Fermez la porte, il fait froid dehors !" Mais une fois la porte fermée, il fait toujours aussi froid dehors.
Ils laisseront durant 2 ou 3 jours tranquilles les avions équipés de sondes pitot ;)
Je pense que le problème des sondes pitot est quelque chose d'important : je vois mal un pilote se retrouver sans indication de vitesse avec un pilote automatique désactivé.
Et j'aimerai mieux ne pas me trouver dans un avion vivant cette situation, ni qu'un de mes proches la vive.
Mais si vous trouvez matière à en rire tant mieux pour vous.
Je pense que le problème des sondes pitot est quelque chose d'important : je vois mal un pilote se retrouver sans indication de vitesse avec un pilote automatique désactivé.
Et j'aimerai mieux ne pas me trouver dans un avion vivant cette situation, ni qu'un de mes proches la vive.
Mais si vous trouvez matière à en rire tant mieux pour vous.
Je pense que le problème des sondes pitot est quelque chose d'important : je vois mal un pilote se retrouver sans indication de vitesse avec un pilote automatique désactivé.
Et j'aimerai mieux ne pas me trouver dans un avion vivant cette situation, ni qu'un de mes proches la vive.
Mais si vous trouvez matière à en rire tant mieux pour vous.
Deux choses: 1. c'est arrivé a pas mal d'avion et apparemment ça en aurait PEUT ETRE fait tomber UN, 2. le clin d'œil est la car le journal Le Monde a titre: "Un Airbus équipé de sonde pitot a eu un incident" (ou quelque chose comme ça). Ce titre est aussi débile que de dire: "Un Airbus équipé d'ailes as eu un incident".
Désolé que vous n'ayez pas compris.
Laurent
Et j'aimerai mieux ne pas me trouver dans un avion vivant cette situation, ni qu'un de mes proches la vive.
Mais si vous trouvez matière à en rire tant mieux pour vous.
Deux choses: 1. c'est arrivé a pas mal d'avion et apparemment ça en aurait PEUT ETRE fait tomber UN, 2. le clin d'œil est la car le journal Le Monde a titre: "Un Airbus équipé de sonde pitot a eu un incident" (ou quelque chose comme ça). Ce titre est aussi débile que de dire: "Un Airbus équipé d'ailes as eu un incident".
Désolé que vous n'ayez pas compris.
Laurent
Étant de montréal, je suis plutôt curieux de savoir ce s'est passé avec le 777 d'AF. slasherfun si tu as des infos...l'actualité aérienne Montréalaise est plutôt vide habituellement...
Et c'est pour ça que tous les ans, Air France vient faire son petit incident technique à Montréal 😎
Cette fois-ci donc, c'est un Boeing 777-200ER (vol AF348 du 29 juillet) qui a connu une panne de son circuit hydraulique central en approche. Ça ne rend pas l'appareil impilotable (et heureusement), mais ça limite la maniabilité de l'avion, un peu en vol, mais surtout au sol.
Donc approche finale, et là bah... problème : http://dl.free.fr/mHkigjCnr L'appareil refait donc son approche (15 min), et se présente une nouvelle fois pour l'atterrissage : http://dl.free.fr/pYSnFNXqc
L'appareil se pose globalement sans encombre, mais n'est pas manoeuvrable au sol (d'où la phrase du pilote "on va essayer de dégager sur la droite"). Manoeuvrable ou pas, il devra de toute façon être réparé, le vol AF349 étant donc annulé comme le pilote l'annonce à la tour.
Voilà voilà 🙂
Et c'est pour ça que tous les ans, Air France vient faire son petit incident technique à Montréal 😎
Cette fois-ci donc, c'est un Boeing 777-200ER (vol AF348 du 29 juillet) qui a connu une panne de son circuit hydraulique central en approche. Ça ne rend pas l'appareil impilotable (et heureusement), mais ça limite la maniabilité de l'avion, un peu en vol, mais surtout au sol.
Donc approche finale, et là bah... problème : http://dl.free.fr/mHkigjCnr L'appareil refait donc son approche (15 min), et se présente une nouvelle fois pour l'atterrissage : http://dl.free.fr/pYSnFNXqc
L'appareil se pose globalement sans encombre, mais n'est pas manoeuvrable au sol (d'où la phrase du pilote "on va essayer de dégager sur la droite"). Manoeuvrable ou pas, il devra de toute façon être réparé, le vol AF349 étant donc annulé comme le pilote l'annonce à la tour.
Voilà voilà 🙂
Contributions CC BY-SA
2. le clin d'œil est la car le journal Le Monde a titre: "Un Airbus équipé de sonde pitot a eu un incident" (ou quelque chose comme ça). Ce titre est aussi débile que de dire: "Un Airbus équipé d'ailes as eu un incident".
je ne connaissais pas ce titre donc je ne pouvais goûté la plaisanterie 😊
Un autre titre débile de Libé ou du Monde : "Les pilotes répudient les sondes pitot" A croire que le projet de loi sur la burqa inspire les journalistes 😎
je ne connaissais pas ce titre donc je ne pouvais goûté la plaisanterie 😊
Un autre titre débile de Libé ou du Monde : "Les pilotes répudient les sondes pitot" A croire que le projet de loi sur la burqa inspire les journalistes 😎
Sans parler des familles des victimes, qui ont engages des avocats anglosaxons, et se sont proclamees experts en securite aerienne !
Ceci sans doute afin de pouvoir obtenir les indemnites les plus fortes possibles : leur priorite serait de trouver une cause origine US pour l accident afin de pouvoir faire un proces outre atlantique... ou les indemnites sont nettement superieures !
Log in first, then come back to this page.
You might also like
How to nail your trek in wet climates: which pants keep you truly dry?
Densha Otaku - Lesser-Known Regions
Two weeks under the Puglia sun
Back to Swedish Lapland: Trekking the Kungsleden and Crossing Sarek
Off on a winter adventure in the American West!
3 weeks in Laos, stress-free
Draw Me Your Japan...
South Africa in safari mode: February/March 2026
More discussions
Great news for those heading to Bahia / Salvador toward the end of the year.
Air France plans to increase flights from 3 to 5 during the December 2026 / February 2027 period.
Original source: Salvador terá mais voos diretos para Paris durante o verão; veja o que muda | Jornal Correio 1
Tropical greetings from Salvador,
@IvanBahiaGuide
(local specialist, active on the French-speaking Brazil Forums for over 16 years now)
Hello,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi there,
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
Hi,
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
Hi there,
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
Hi,
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
Hi,
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
Hello,
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
Hello,
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Hi everyone,
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
Hi there!
Has anyone taken the direct flight from CDG to Las Vegas with Air France?
Looking forward to your feedback!
Hey everyone,
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
Hi there,
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric
Hi there,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
Hi there,
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry
Hi there,
I have a question...
Has anyone managed to get a refund from Oman Air?
After a delayed flight, we missed our connecting flight to get home!! At midnight, the flight attendant booked us on a flight to Nice via Munich, even though we were in Munich and wanted to get back to Nice... Too tired from the trip, we didn’t notice the mistake!! The next day, of course, the booking wasn’t valid!! We had to pay again for the flight back to Nice... I’m really struggling!! I think they’re giving me the runaround!! I’ve sent several emails, tried Messenger and WhatsApp, but the only responses I get are: "We need to investigate!! We’ll get back to you in 15 days!!" It’s been over a month!!
I just sent a registered letter (LRAR) to their office at Paris Charles de Gaulle, which is still open!!
Do you have any other suggestions for me?
Thanks in advance for your help! Virginie
After a delayed flight, we missed our connecting flight to get home!! At midnight, the flight attendant booked us on a flight to Nice via Munich, even though we were in Munich and wanted to get back to Nice... Too tired from the trip, we didn’t notice the mistake!! The next day, of course, the booking wasn’t valid!! We had to pay again for the flight back to Nice... I’m really struggling!! I think they’re giving me the runaround!! I’ve sent several emails, tried Messenger and WhatsApp, but the only responses I get are: "We need to investigate!! We’ll get back to you in 15 days!!" It’s been over a month!!
I just sent a registered letter (LRAR) to their office at Paris Charles de Gaulle, which is still open!!
Do you have any other suggestions for me?
Thanks in advance for your help! Virginie
Hi!
Sri Lanka has announced it could run out of fuel in the coming weeks if the Strait of Hormuz remains blocked. The government has implemented a mandatory four-day workweek to save oil, and there are long lines at gas stations due to fears of an early shortage.
In Vietnam, the government has warned all airlines that flights will need to be reduced due to a lack of kerosene. The country imports two-thirds of its jet fuel from China and Thailand, but both countries have now banned exports out of fear of domestic shortages.
The state is asking airlines to plan ahead and park aircraft to drastically reduce operations, starting with domestic flights and then international ones. International carriers will also need to cut back on their rotations.
This will begin in the coming days. 🙁
Hi there,
I’ve got a long layover (about 10 hours) in Seoul on an upcoming trip.
I arrive from Phnom Penh at 7:20 AM and depart for Montreal at 6:00 PM.
First question: Will my checked baggage be transferred automatically? I have a single ticket from KTI to YUL (Air Canada ticket—KTI-ICN operated by Asiana (codeshare) and ICN-YUL by Air Canada).
Second question: I saw it’s possible to join free guided tours (Airport Transit Tour). What do you think of this kind of service? And is my "actual" layover time (accounting for security checks, check-in, etc.) enough to do one of these tours?
Thanks in advance to everyone who chimes in on this!
First question: Will my checked baggage be transferred automatically? I have a single ticket from KTI to YUL (Air Canada ticket—KTI-ICN operated by Asiana (codeshare) and ICN-YUL by Air Canada).
Second question: I saw it’s possible to join free guided tours (Airport Transit Tour). What do you think of this kind of service? And is my "actual" layover time (accounting for security checks, check-in, etc.) enough to do one of these tours?
Thanks in advance to everyone who chimes in on this!
Hi everyone,
I'm heading to Namibia next May. I'm planning to take a first flight from Paris to Johannesburg with Air France, departing at 11:20 PM and arriving at 11:05 AM in Johannesburg. Then a second flight from Johannesburg to Windhoek at 3:25 PM with South African Airways.
Four hours between the two flights seems enough to catch my connection, but a friend told me I should maybe take the 5:30 PM flight instead because I need to go through immigration, collect my luggage, and check in again. Apparently, I have to do this because I bought the two tickets separately (it's actually much cheaper).
What do you think?
Also, in terms of South African airlines, which one do you think is the most reliable between South African Airways and Airlink?
Thanks for your advice!!
So, even before starting my explanation, I’d like to introduce myself since this is my first post on the forum :) I’m Jérôme, a huge Asia enthusiast, and I’m currently in the process of moving to Japan with my family in 2028.
Now, onto the topic :)
We’re a family of four traveling together to Seoul, with two separate bookings.
Our original itinerary was: Madrid → Doha → Seoul (March 23–24)
The issue is that our entire outbound flight was canceled, and the airline simply rescheduled the Madrid → Doha leg. Now we’re left with an incomplete journey, with no solution to reach our final destination (Seoul).
Since then:
- Can’t modify flights online (technical error every time) - Can’t get help via chat or WhatsApp - Phone support is unreachable, and the usual French number isn’t working right now
We don’t want a refund. We just want to be rerouted to Seoul, as our original ticket promised.
We’re flexible:
- On dates (we can leave on March 21 or 22 instead of the 23rd) - On the itinerary (different layovers if needed)
Have any of you dealt with this before? Do you know how to unlock a booking in this case or get a rerouting? We’re considering going straight to the airport to resolve it at the Qatar Airways counter....
Thanks so much for your help! 😊
Now, onto the topic :)
We’re a family of four traveling together to Seoul, with two separate bookings.
Our original itinerary was: Madrid → Doha → Seoul (March 23–24)
The issue is that our entire outbound flight was canceled, and the airline simply rescheduled the Madrid → Doha leg. Now we’re left with an incomplete journey, with no solution to reach our final destination (Seoul).
Since then:
- Can’t modify flights online (technical error every time) - Can’t get help via chat or WhatsApp - Phone support is unreachable, and the usual French number isn’t working right now
We don’t want a refund. We just want to be rerouted to Seoul, as our original ticket promised.
We’re flexible:
- On dates (we can leave on March 21 or 22 instead of the 23rd) - On the itinerary (different layovers if needed)
Have any of you dealt with this before? Do you know how to unlock a booking in this case or get a rerouting? We’re considering going straight to the airport to resolve it at the Qatar Airways counter....
Thanks so much for your help! 😊
Hi,
We just received an email from Volotea saying our flight time has changed (by more than 2 hours).
The email states "you can request a free date change."
If I change the date, will the flight price stay the same as the original price, or will I have to pay the difference?
Specifically: Our flight on the 7th is 46.25 €, and the one on the 8th is 92.51 €. If we switch to the 8th, how much will we pay?
When I request the date change to the 8th, it says "No additional fees."
Thanks and have a great day! 🙂
Hi everyone,
We’re going on a Nile cruise.
My question:
We’re taking off from Brussels Airport to land in Cairo.
Then we have to catch a second flight to Luxor.
How does that work—do we pick up our luggage, do we have to exit and then re-enter the airport?
Thanks for your help, tips, and advice, etc.…