Hi there,
I’m planning a winter trip across India. Departing in early December and returning to France in mid-April.
My main concern is finding an airline that offers this round-trip with the fewest hassles regarding cancellations or flight schedule changes. The unstable geopolitical situation in the Middle East isn’t making this search any easier—recent reviews online about airlines from Gulf states describe quite a few struggles over the past few months.
The direct Paris-Delhi round-trip flights offered by Air France or Air India are probably the safest options, but not the cheapest!
Given this uncertainty, I’m still holding off on finalizing my ticket purchase... Maybe some of you India lovers on VoyageForum have tips or experiences to share?
Thanks, and happy travels to all.
Toutes les destinations de l'A380
by Iban323
This discussion is in French, the community’s main language.
C'est possible mais pour cette année British Airways avait comme destination New York et ça ne sera pas le cas et ça sera plus pour le printemps 2014.
Il n'y a pas de c'est possible , les destinations citées ci dessus sont officielles
Airbus livre son 100ième A380
Mars aura décidément été un mois marquant pour la flotte d’Airbus A380 de Malaysia Airlines. Après le déploiement de son gros porteur sur Paris, la compagnie vient de recevoir son 6e A380, qui se trouve également être le 100ième super jumbo du constructeur européen.
«Nous sommes très heureux que notre 100e A380 ait été livré à Malaysia Airlines, car nous pouvons ainsi entrevoir l'avenir de l'aviation», a expliqué le président exécutif d'Airbus, Fabrice Brégier dans un communiqué publié ce jeudi 14 mars. «Nous constatons une demande croissante de la part de compagnies dynamiques et compétitives telles que MAS en appareils de plus grande capacité, sur de nombreux marchés et lignes, et en particulier dans la région Asie-Pacifique en croissance rapide, qui convient parfaitement aux A380». Le super jumbo est en service depuis 2006, il est présent maintenant dans les flottes de 9 transporteurs. A ce jour, 262 appareils de ce type ont été commandés par 20 compagnies. Le constructeur a également précisé que d’ici 20 ans plus de 1700 gros porteurs tels que l'A380 seront livrés. L'Asie-Pacifique est la plus grosse cliente avec 45 % des demandes d'avions de grande capacité, suivie par le Moyen-Orient (23 %) et l'Europe (19 %). Cette 100ièmeme livraison est un bel événement pour cet appareil dont les problèmes de microfissures avaient mis à mal son image, mais également pour Airbus qui a perdu son titre de constructeur n°1 en 2012.
Mars aura décidément été un mois marquant pour la flotte d’Airbus A380 de Malaysia Airlines. Après le déploiement de son gros porteur sur Paris, la compagnie vient de recevoir son 6e A380, qui se trouve également être le 100ième super jumbo du constructeur européen.
«Nous sommes très heureux que notre 100e A380 ait été livré à Malaysia Airlines, car nous pouvons ainsi entrevoir l'avenir de l'aviation», a expliqué le président exécutif d'Airbus, Fabrice Brégier dans un communiqué publié ce jeudi 14 mars. «Nous constatons une demande croissante de la part de compagnies dynamiques et compétitives telles que MAS en appareils de plus grande capacité, sur de nombreux marchés et lignes, et en particulier dans la région Asie-Pacifique en croissance rapide, qui convient parfaitement aux A380». Le super jumbo est en service depuis 2006, il est présent maintenant dans les flottes de 9 transporteurs. A ce jour, 262 appareils de ce type ont été commandés par 20 compagnies. Le constructeur a également précisé que d’ici 20 ans plus de 1700 gros porteurs tels que l'A380 seront livrés. L'Asie-Pacifique est la plus grosse cliente avec 45 % des demandes d'avions de grande capacité, suivie par le Moyen-Orient (23 %) et l'Europe (19 %). Cette 100ièmeme livraison est un bel événement pour cet appareil dont les problèmes de microfissures avaient mis à mal son image, mais également pour Airbus qui a perdu son titre de constructeur n°1 en 2012.
MAJ AVRIL 2013 :
- Air france - Lufthansa - China - Thai - Malaysia
AIR FRANCE (CDG) :
- New York - Washington - Johannesburg - Los Angeles - Singapour (jusqu'au 2 septembre 2013) - Shanghai (à partir du 2 septembre 2013) - Tokyo
LUFTHANSA (Frankfort) :
- Houston - Singapour - Johannesburg - Pékin - Tokyo - San Francisco - Shanghai (à partir du 26 septembre 2013)
EMIRATES (Dubai) :
- Hong-Kong - Londres - Sydney - Bangkok - Toronto - Paris - Séoul - Djeddah - Pékin - Manchester - New York - Shangai - Kuala Lumpur - Rome - Munich - Tokyo (jusqu'au 01 juin) - Melbourne - Amsterdam - Auckland (via Melbourne) - Auckland (via Sydney) - Moscou - Singapour
QANTAS :
- Sydney > Los Angeles - Sydney > Singapour - Sydney > Hong Kong - Sydney > Londres - Melbourne > Los Angeles - Melbourne > Singapour - Melbourne > Londres - Singapour > Londres
CHINA SOUTHERN AIRLINES (Bejing) :
- Guangzhou - Shanghai - Hong Kong - Los Angeles - Paris - Sydney (à partir du 27 octobre 2013)
KOREAN AIR (Seoul) :
- Hong-Kong - Los Angeles - New York - Paris - Tokyo
SINGAPORE AIRLINES (Singapour) :
- Sydney - Zurich - Paris - Melbourne - Londres - Hong-Kong - Los Angeles - New York - Tokyo - Frankfort
- MALAYSIA AIRLINES (Kuala Lumpur) :
- Londres - Tokyo - Paris - Hong Kong
- THAY AIRWAYS (Bangkok) :
- Francfort - Tokyo - Paris
- Air france - Lufthansa - China - Thai - Malaysia
AIR FRANCE (CDG) :
- New York - Washington - Johannesburg - Los Angeles - Singapour (jusqu'au 2 septembre 2013) - Shanghai (à partir du 2 septembre 2013) - Tokyo
LUFTHANSA (Frankfort) :
- Houston - Singapour - Johannesburg - Pékin - Tokyo - San Francisco - Shanghai (à partir du 26 septembre 2013)
EMIRATES (Dubai) :
- Hong-Kong - Londres - Sydney - Bangkok - Toronto - Paris - Séoul - Djeddah - Pékin - Manchester - New York - Shangai - Kuala Lumpur - Rome - Munich - Tokyo (jusqu'au 01 juin) - Melbourne - Amsterdam - Auckland (via Melbourne) - Auckland (via Sydney) - Moscou - Singapour
QANTAS :
- Sydney > Los Angeles - Sydney > Singapour - Sydney > Hong Kong - Sydney > Londres - Melbourne > Los Angeles - Melbourne > Singapour - Melbourne > Londres - Singapour > Londres
CHINA SOUTHERN AIRLINES (Bejing) :
- Guangzhou - Shanghai - Hong Kong - Los Angeles - Paris - Sydney (à partir du 27 octobre 2013)
KOREAN AIR (Seoul) :
- Hong-Kong - Los Angeles - New York - Paris - Tokyo
SINGAPORE AIRLINES (Singapour) :
- Sydney - Zurich - Paris - Melbourne - Londres - Hong-Kong - Los Angeles - New York - Tokyo - Frankfort
- MALAYSIA AIRLINES (Kuala Lumpur) :
- Londres - Tokyo - Paris - Hong Kong
- THAY AIRWAYS (Bangkok) :
- Francfort - Tokyo - Paris
Vous n'avez pas mentionné British Airways.
MAJ JUIN 2013 :
AIR FRANCE (CDG) :
- New York - Washington - Johannesburg - Los Angeles - Singapour (jusqu'au 2 septembre 2013) - Shanghai (à partir du 2 septembre 2013) - Tokyo
LUFTHANSA (Francfort) :
- Houston - Singapour - Johannesburg (jusqu'au 25 septembre 2013) - Pékin - Tokyo - San Francisco - Shanghai (à partir du 26 septembre 2013)
EMIRATES (Dubai) :
- Hong-Kong - Londres - Sydney - Bangkok - Toronto - Paris - Séoul - Djeddah - Pékin - Manchester - New York - Shangai - Kuala Lumpur - Rome - Munich - Melbourne - Amsterdam - Moscou - Singapour - Brisbane (01 octobre 2013) - Los Angeles (02 décembre 2013)
QANTAS :
- Sydney > Los Angeles - Sydney > Singapour - Sydney > Hong Kong - Sydney > Londres - Melbourne > Los Angeles - Melbourne > Singapour - Melbourne > Londres - Singapour > Londres
CHINA SOUTHERN AIRLINES (Bejing) :
- Guangzhou - Shanghai - Hong Kong - Los Angeles - Paris - Sydney (à partir du 27 octobre 2013)
KOREAN AIR (Seoul) :
- Hong-Kong - Los Angeles - New York - Paris - Tokyo
SINGAPORE AIRLINES (Singapour) :
- Sydney - Zurich - Paris - Melbourne - Londres - Hong-Kong - Los Angeles - New York - Tokyo - Frankfort
- MALAYSIA AIRLINES (Kuala Lumpur) :
- Londres - Tokyo - Paris - Hong Kong
- THAY AIRWAYS (Bangkok) :
- Tokyo - Paris - Hong Kong
AIR FRANCE (CDG) :
- New York - Washington - Johannesburg - Los Angeles - Singapour (jusqu'au 2 septembre 2013) - Shanghai (à partir du 2 septembre 2013) - Tokyo
LUFTHANSA (Francfort) :
- Houston - Singapour - Johannesburg (jusqu'au 25 septembre 2013) - Pékin - Tokyo - San Francisco - Shanghai (à partir du 26 septembre 2013)
EMIRATES (Dubai) :
- Hong-Kong - Londres - Sydney - Bangkok - Toronto - Paris - Séoul - Djeddah - Pékin - Manchester - New York - Shangai - Kuala Lumpur - Rome - Munich - Melbourne - Amsterdam - Moscou - Singapour - Brisbane (01 octobre 2013) - Los Angeles (02 décembre 2013)
QANTAS :
- Sydney > Los Angeles - Sydney > Singapour - Sydney > Hong Kong - Sydney > Londres - Melbourne > Los Angeles - Melbourne > Singapour - Melbourne > Londres - Singapour > Londres
CHINA SOUTHERN AIRLINES (Bejing) :
- Guangzhou - Shanghai - Hong Kong - Los Angeles - Paris - Sydney (à partir du 27 octobre 2013)
KOREAN AIR (Seoul) :
- Hong-Kong - Los Angeles - New York - Paris - Tokyo
SINGAPORE AIRLINES (Singapour) :
- Sydney - Zurich - Paris - Melbourne - Londres - Hong-Kong - Los Angeles - New York - Tokyo - Frankfort
- MALAYSIA AIRLINES (Kuala Lumpur) :
- Londres - Tokyo - Paris - Hong Kong
- THAY AIRWAYS (Bangkok) :
- Tokyo - Paris - Hong Kong
Cette année il y aura Los Angeles et Hong Kong avec British Airways. Mais pour British Airways il devrait y avoir d'autres destinations d'Airbus a 380. Là vous écrivez les destinations d'Airbus a 380 sans mentionner les destinations des Airbus a 380 de British Airways. De plus il reste 11 mois avant que Asiana Airlines reçoit son premier Airbus a 380 et quelqu'un ma dit que la première destination d'Airbus a 380 de Asiana Airlines sera Los Angeles. Peut-être cette automne on connaitra la première destination d'Airbus a 380 de Qatar Airways a suivre.
Si vous allez voir au http://www.air-journal.fr/2013-06-27-qatar-airways-lairbus-a380-ira-a-londres-puis-paris-577428.html. Vous verrez les destinations de l'Airbus a 380 de Qatar Airways.
British Airways a comme destination pour ses Airbus a 380 LAX, HKG et JNB.
c'est bien ça !
c'est d'ailleurs il me semble la seule compagnie à le faire hors tests.
c'est d'ailleurs il me semble la seule compagnie à le faire hors tests.
Mais est ce rentable de le faire voler sur une distance aussi courte ?
En classe unique : 380 : 2L/100Km/Passager 800 passagers 320 : 4L/100Km/Passager 180 passagers
Donc pour l'équivalent d'un 380 il faut plus de 4 A320 soit 8x plus de Kérosène et 4 fois plus de taxe d'aéroport et de personnel. Même si le cout d'entretien doit être plus élevé (et encore) Je pense que la rentabilité reste la.
Je prends pour comparaison un A320 car il reste un modèle hyper répandu pour ce genre de liaisons.
En classe unique : 380 : 2L/100Km/Passager 800 passagers 320 : 4L/100Km/Passager 180 passagers
Donc pour l'équivalent d'un 380 il faut plus de 4 A320 soit 8x plus de Kérosène et 4 fois plus de taxe d'aéroport et de personnel. Même si le cout d'entretien doit être plus élevé (et encore) Je pense que la rentabilité reste la.
Je prends pour comparaison un A320 car il reste un modèle hyper répandu pour ce genre de liaisons.
Si vous regarder ici au http://www.britishairways.com/en-gb/information/flight-information/airbus-a380 vous verrez que British Airways ira en Airbus a 380 à Washington au mois de septembre et aussi à Johannesbourg le 12 février prochain.
C'est vrai mais en hiver seulement en été ils le font en 747 et l'été passé sur Miami Lufthansa a envoyé un 747-8 intercontinental de plus il y avait des rumeurs qui disaient que British Airways allait envoyer un Airbus a 380 à Miami. Mais pour l'instant ce n'est pas prévu peut-être que ça va aller pour l'horaire d'hiver 2014-2015. On sait que British Airways utilise un Boeing 747-400 sur Miami 2 fois par jour.
D'après le site de www.air-journal.fr, HND est la 3e destination de l'Airbus a 380 de QR.
D'après le site de www.air-journal.fr, HND est la 3e destination de l'Airbus a 380 de QR.
Suis un peu surpris de ces propos, pas trop dans la politique QR, mais bon ? d'où vient l'info ? ( avant air journal qui ne fait que reprendre)
Suis un peu surpris de ces propos, pas trop dans la politique QR, mais bon ? d'où vient l'info ? ( avant air journal qui ne fait que reprendre)
Du site de Air journal mais aussi j'ai un ami qui travaille à l'aéroport Pierre-Elliot Trudau et il m'a prédit que l'Airbus a 380 reviendra à YUL avec QR. Ça veut dire que QR reprendra la place d'AF à YUL avec l'Airbus a 380. De plus pensez vous que l'Airbus a 380 reviendra un jour à YUL.
... mais aussi j'ai un ami qui travaille à l'aéroport Pierre-Elliot Trudau et il m'a prédit que l'Airbus a 380 reviendra à YUL avec QR. Ça veut dire que QR reprendra la place d'AF à YUL avec l'Airbus a 380.
Désolé mais c''est du pipeau ... du n'importe quoi
Qatar a peu de ces nouvelles machines et la mise en place des A380 mais aussi B787 et bientôt A350 se fait par mouvements glissants mais pas sur de lignes 100% nouvelles sur DOH / CDG le A380 remplace le A340-600 sur une des rotations sur DOH / BKK idem ce sera le remplacement du B777 par un A380 et ... si QR vient a Canada je pense que comme Emirates ça serait plus Toronto ... mais la aussi le nb de machines QR n'est pas extensible chez QR et le marché cible hors Europe c'est l'Asie
Pour du A380 de AF a YUL d'une façon régulière/permanante c'est peu probable a court terme, ça a déjà été abordé ici AF n'a pas une config adapté a la ligne ( pas assez d'Eco et "trop" de First Biz) d'ou du B747-400 ou du B77730ER (COI) qui ont plus de sièges classe Eco qu'un A380 C'est inutile de répéter ta question tous les 6 mois 🙂 ça ne changera vraiment que si AF a d'autres config sur ses A380 et surtout en a plus, ou si le marché évoluait beaucoup, a YUL
Désolé mais c''est du pipeau ... du n'importe quoi
Qatar a peu de ces nouvelles machines et la mise en place des A380 mais aussi B787 et bientôt A350 se fait par mouvements glissants mais pas sur de lignes 100% nouvelles sur DOH / CDG le A380 remplace le A340-600 sur une des rotations sur DOH / BKK idem ce sera le remplacement du B777 par un A380 et ... si QR vient a Canada je pense que comme Emirates ça serait plus Toronto ... mais la aussi le nb de machines QR n'est pas extensible chez QR et le marché cible hors Europe c'est l'Asie
Pour du A380 de AF a YUL d'une façon régulière/permanante c'est peu probable a court terme, ça a déjà été abordé ici AF n'a pas une config adapté a la ligne ( pas assez d'Eco et "trop" de First Biz) d'ou du B747-400 ou du B77730ER (COI) qui ont plus de sièges classe Eco qu'un A380 C'est inutile de répéter ta question tous les 6 mois 🙂 ça ne changera vraiment que si AF a d'autres config sur ses A380 et surtout en a plus, ou si le marché évoluait beaucoup, a YUL
À YUL nous avons QR en 77W 3 fois par semaine le mercredi, vendredi et dimanche. YUL est le seul aéroport Canadien à être desservi par QR. LH et BA n'enverront jamais l'Airbus a 380 à YUL. Pourtant BA ira à YUL en 787 au printemps prochain.
La question est surtout à savoir si la liaison YUL-DOH attire suffisamment de passagers pour supporter un A380.
J'aimerais bien voir Icelandair à YUL... ou SAS vers Arlanda... mais surement pas en A380 !
J'aimerais bien voir Icelandair à YUL... ou SAS vers Arlanda... mais surement pas en A380 !
À YUL nous avons QR en 77W 3 fois par semaine le mercredi, vendredi et dimanche. .
oupssssssssss je l'avais oublié pourtant je le savais De tte façon le pbl de QR et ses A380 reste +/- le mm que AF - peu de machines ( mm - que AF) - des "classes avant" first et Biz qu'il faut remplir
donc la priorité va aux lignes ou il y a de la demande, si celle ci existe sur YUL il y aura sinon ...non (les A380 QR sont tri-classes)
Normalement des B787 devaient être "libres" par l'introduction du A350 sur certaines chez chez QR pourquoi pas passer en B787 sur YUL (c'est une machine bi-classe), en augmentant les fréquences ? ça semble plus dans la logique QR pour bien feeder son hub de Doha !
oupssssssssss je l'avais oublié pourtant je le savais De tte façon le pbl de QR et ses A380 reste +/- le mm que AF - peu de machines ( mm - que AF) - des "classes avant" first et Biz qu'il faut remplir
donc la priorité va aux lignes ou il y a de la demande, si celle ci existe sur YUL il y aura sinon ...non (les A380 QR sont tri-classes)
Normalement des B787 devaient être "libres" par l'introduction du A350 sur certaines chez chez QR pourquoi pas passer en B787 sur YUL (c'est une machine bi-classe), en augmentant les fréquences ? ça semble plus dans la logique QR pour bien feeder son hub de Doha !
Normalement des B787 devaient être "libres" par l'introduction du A350 sur certaines chez chez QR pourquoi pas passer en B787 sur YUL (c'est une machine bi-classe), en augmentant les fréquences ? ça semble plus dans la logique QR pour bien feeder son hub de Doha !
Je vois les choses de la même manière. La clientèle de YUL est une clientèle plutôt cheap qui aime les classes économiques. AF nous envoie même des B777 en configuration Caraïbes plus denses. Je vois plus des B787 plus fréquents que des A380 sur Doha. Et la fréquence accrue, quitte à le faire avec un plus petit appareil, est même souhaitable pour créer une habitude chez les passagers.
Je vois les choses de la même manière. La clientèle de YUL est une clientèle plutôt cheap qui aime les classes économiques. AF nous envoie même des B777 en configuration Caraïbes plus denses. Je vois plus des B787 plus fréquents que des A380 sur Doha. Et la fréquence accrue, quitte à le faire avec un plus petit appareil, est même souhaitable pour créer une habitude chez les passagers.
Pour YUL-DOH il y a sûrement des membres de ce site qui l'ont emprunté et si c'est le ça qu'ils me disent quelle a été le taux de remplissage. Pourquoi Icelandair à YUL et pourquoi avons nous besoin de vols directs avec SAS entre YUL et ARN?
AF envoye les 77W en version COI à YUL en été seulement mais d'ici 2016 quand ils ne restera plus de 747 dans la flotte d'AF que va - t'il arriver entre CDG et YUL un Boeing 777-300ER. Je viens de remarquer que AF perd des plumes à YUL puisque le vol AF 342 / 345 passera de 744 en 772 le 29 mars prochain. Je pense qu'en 2017 qui l'année du 375e anniversaire de Montréal l'Airbus a 380 pourra être de retour à YUL.
QR en classe affaires a mi 52 sièges à bord de ses Airbus a 380 ça c'est qu'AF. Mais QR à déjà reçu 2 Airbus a 380 plus 8 autres commandes fermes avec 3 en option. Si QR n'a pas le droit d'augmenter ses fréquences sur YUL et bien ils pourraient envoyer un Airbus a 380 à YUL.
Pour YUL-DOH il y a sûrement des membres de ce site qui l'ont emprunté et si c'est le ça qu'ils me disent quelle a été le taux de remplissage. Pourquoi Icelandair à YUL et pourquoi avons nous besoin de vols directs avec SAS entre YUL et ARN?
Pourquoi Icelandair à YUL ? Pour ses prix. Vers plusieurs destinations européennes (surtout scandinaves), Icelandair est imbattable. En plus, ils autorisent 2 bagages de 23 kg contre un seul pour les autres compagnies. ET sans oublier que l'escale à KEF est courte, ce qui permet d'arriver plus tôt à la destination finale.
SAS vers ARN... simple volonté personnelle d'avoir un vol sans escale vers ma destination favorite.
Pourquoi Icelandair à YUL ? Pour ses prix. Vers plusieurs destinations européennes (surtout scandinaves), Icelandair est imbattable. En plus, ils autorisent 2 bagages de 23 kg contre un seul pour les autres compagnies. ET sans oublier que l'escale à KEF est courte, ce qui permet d'arriver plus tôt à la destination finale.
SAS vers ARN... simple volonté personnelle d'avoir un vol sans escale vers ma destination favorite.
Je viens d'apprendre que Vancouver sera desservi par l'Airbus a 380 le 1er mai prochain avec British Airways. Présentement l'Airbus a 380 ne dessert pas Vancouver.
Log in first, then come back to this page.
You might also like
More discussions
Hi everyone,
Next January, I’m heading to India.
My outbound flight is with Emirates from Paris to Dubai, then another Emirates flight from Dubai to Calcutta.
Could anyone tell me how the connection works? I’ve heard there’s a dedicated Emirates zone, but how does it actually work in practice—I’ve got a 2-hour layover.
Thanks so much!
Take care.
Hi everyone,
I’m heading to Madagascar in early October to cycle from Tana to Diego along the east coast.
I really want to visit the Masoala Peninsula and its primary forest. If anyone’s interested, I’m open to company.
Maybe see you soon!
Hi,
I’m thinking of heading to Malaysia soon.
I’ve seen some great prices and direct flights from Paris with Malaysia Airlines.
Is it a reliable airline?
Thanks for your feedback!
Hello,
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August. My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August. My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Hi there,
We had planned a trip to Sicily in August, and due to the volcanic eruption of Mount Etna, my flight was canceled. The airline is refunding the outbound flight, but none of the non-refundable expenses: accommodation booked through Booking, rental car, and the return flight aren’t covered. My SUPER Gold card doesn’t work in this specific case! :( If anyone has been in this situation, could you let me know if you were able to get any recourse and, if so, how?
Thanks in advance
I’ve been traveling regularly for over twenty years,
but this is the first time an airline has treated me as poorly as Air France.
Two trips, two problems. The latest:
Trip from Seoul to Rennes. Last leg from Paris CDG to Rennes with Air France.
I arrive in Paris and go straight to Air France to get my boarding pass to Rennes. They assure me my baggage is continuing to Rennes.
Arriving in Rennes, no baggage—same as five other people.
The Air France office is closed, and the airport staff tell me there’s rarely anyone there.
With the help of the airport staff, I file a claim online, and my baggage is almost immediately located. As a result, I’m told I’ll have it the next day.
Four days later, the baggage is still in the same place at CDG—nothing’s moving.
The problem is Air France has no customer service. What they call customer service is a department that takes an hour to answer and just repeats what’s on the online form. No coordination, no way to get things moving. I guess Air France would rather pay the compensation after 21 days than actually do something.
I’ve had lost baggage on other trips, but this is the first time I’ve seen such indifference and lack of professionalism.
but this is the first time an airline has treated me as poorly as Air France.
Two trips, two problems. The latest:
Trip from Seoul to Rennes. Last leg from Paris CDG to Rennes with Air France.
I arrive in Paris and go straight to Air France to get my boarding pass to Rennes. They assure me my baggage is continuing to Rennes.
Arriving in Rennes, no baggage—same as five other people.
The Air France office is closed, and the airport staff tell me there’s rarely anyone there.
With the help of the airport staff, I file a claim online, and my baggage is almost immediately located. As a result, I’m told I’ll have it the next day.
Four days later, the baggage is still in the same place at CDG—nothing’s moving.
The problem is Air France has no customer service. What they call customer service is a department that takes an hour to answer and just repeats what’s on the online form. No coordination, no way to get things moving. I guess Air France would rather pay the compensation after 21 days than actually do something.
I’ve had lost baggage on other trips, but this is the first time I’ve seen such indifference and lack of professionalism.
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi,
I booked an Etihad ticket on their website for Dusseldorf-Abu Dhabi. In the first name field, I entered all my first names (something I never do and I regret it, but the site was confusing). Everything is spelled correctly, but the problem is that I just received my new passport and only my first two first names and the first letter of the third appear—there’s no trace of the last one.
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in. Thanks for your feedback!
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in. Thanks for your feedback!
Hi there,
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon. I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport. Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…). AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly. On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double! In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others? Given the price difference, I’m hesitant… Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go? Thanks, HERVE
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon. I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport. Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…). AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly. On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double! In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others? Given the price difference, I’m hesitant… Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go? Thanks, HERVE
Hi everyone, I’ve unfortunately only just noticed that I booked two flight tickets, but I made a mistake on the second first name. Basically, my computer auto-filled and typed my first name twice, so both tickets are in my first name. Only the last names—mine and my friend’s—are correct.
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common). I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common). I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
Hello,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Hi there,
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
Hi,
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
Hi there,
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
Hi,
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
Hi,
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
Hello,
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
Hello,
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Hi everyone,
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
Hi there!
Has anyone taken the direct flight from CDG to Las Vegas with Air France?
Looking forward to your feedback!
Hey everyone,
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
Hi there,
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric







