Il est toujours avantageux de porter un titre nobiliaire. Etre "de quelque chose", ca pose un homme, comme être "de Garenne", ca pose un lapin - Alphonse Allais
Il me revient que les vols TUI vers Punta Cana se feraient actuellement avec un Lockheed L15.
Selon Jetair, le nouvel appareil en question devait être un 767-300.
QUID ?
Il est toujours avantageux de porter un titre nobiliaire. Etre "de quelque chose", ca pose un homme, comme être "de Garenne", ca pose un lapin - Alphonse Allais
Effectivement Michel, et c'est ce qui m'inquiète...
Il est toujours avantageux de porter un titre nobiliaire. Etre "de quelque chose", ca pose un homme, comme être "de Garenne", ca pose un lapin - Alphonse Allais
Il semble que la mise en service du 767 soit suspendue à des problèmes administratifs. Je ne sais pas en Belgique ce que cela signifie, mais en France les pb administarifs c'est rarement bon signe!
Alors un vieux Tristar pour le moment!!!, comme Corsair qui lui aussi attends de "nouveaux" appareils et est obligé d'affreter pour de nombreux vols par manque de disponibilité!
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Il est toujours avantageux de porter un titre nobiliaire. Etre "de quelque chose", ca pose un homme, comme être "de Garenne", ca pose un lapin - Alphonse Allais
Ce serait un L1011-500 de la Cie portugaise Euro Atlantic
Ce type d'appareil peut faire BRU/Rep Dom. non stop maintenant qu'il le fasse c'est autre chose
Le 767 serait arrivé du Brésil a BRU hier mais bon comme dit plus haut il subsiste des PB
De toute façon il ne faut pas trop se poser de questions, il y a un GROS probleme de disponibilité d'appareils que ce soit en Belgique ou en France pour les vols vers les Caraibes
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Je reviens de RD avec la Cie Jet air :Départ le 11/12 et retour le 21/12.
L'avion avait effectivement l'air d'un vieux machin.Le personnel à bord est un mixte de personnel Jet air et de personnel portuguais.
En résumé: Pas d'écran multiples ni de suivi de vol.A l'aller, un seul film diffusé mais le son ne passait pas par des écouteurs car le système est HS --> uniquement en français. Au retour : pas de film du tout !
J'avais fait le même voyage en novembre avec le Holland exell: écrans multiples et suivi de vol.A l'aller : 2 films avec langue réglable et au retour 2 films version anglaise sous titré Néerlandais car traduction française HS.
Je ne sais à qui donner ma préférence ! A Jetair car le personnel est plus sympathique et serviable ou à Exell car l'avion est un plus confortable et moderne.
Nourriture : de niveau équivalent
Retard d'horaire : rien de vraiment significatif (max 1 heure.)
Franchement, pour des vols charters, je n'ai vraiment à me plaindre ni de l'un ni de l'autre car se sont de petits détails .
Pourrais-tu me dire combien de temps ont duré les vols (temps passé en cabine et nombre d'escales) ?
Il est toujours avantageux de porter un titre nobiliaire. Etre "de quelque chose", ca pose un homme, comme être "de Garenne", ca pose un lapin - Alphonse Allais
Pour le retour, je ne sais pas exactement car je n'avais pas de montre mais +/- 13.30 heures entre l'embarquement à Punta Cana et le retour à BXl. Nous sommes restés environ 1 h30 en transit à Montego Bay (Jamaique).
Je crois que tu pars en janvier alors bonnes vacances et profites au maximum.
Je vois que le retour n'a pas du être trop joyeux 😕...
Joyeux Noël et excellentes fêtes de fin d'année.
😉
Il est toujours avantageux de porter un titre nobiliaire. Etre "de quelque chose", ca pose un homme, comme être "de Garenne", ca pose un lapin - Alphonse Allais
Par contre tjrs pb administratif il a été obligé de voler sous son ancienne immatriculation bresilienne n'etant pas encore approuvé par l'aviation civile belge !!!!
Esperons que ce pb va vite se règler et bon vol
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Celle-ci rassurera tout ceux qui attendaient ce nouvel appareil. Reste à savoir quand il sera mis en service par Jetair (partant le 19/01, j'espère pouvoir en bénéficier...)
Je te souhaite une bonne fin d'année.
😉
Il est toujours avantageux de porter un titre nobiliaire. Etre "de quelque chose", ca pose un homme, comme être "de Garenne", ca pose un lapin - Alphonse Allais
Selon certaines sources il subsite bien quelques problèmes qui devraient se règler assez vite et le 1er vol serait prevu le 12 janvier alors ... mais le conditionnel est de mise dans le TP aérien.
Je pense que TUIB /JetAir va tout faire pour le faire voler rapidement car un appareil au sol ça coute cher !!
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Je ne peux que confirmer ce qu'ont répondu les autres 'forumeurs' dans ton topic.
Je viens tout de même de contacter mes collègues de Jetair ici à Zaventem, et ils n'ont encore aucune idée d'une date précise. Début janvier... c'est tout ce que j'ai pu savoir...
Pour ce qui est de l'appareil utilisé pour l'instant, c'est donc bien un Lockheed L-1011 Tristar 500 ayant comme propriétaire ICAO Air Luxor. Immatriculé CSTMP. Mais je dis bien 'pour l'instant' car TUI utilise également un autre Tristar, le CSTEB, propriétaire ICAO Euroatlantic Airways, pour ses vols sur Cancun/Varadero via Lisbonne... Deux belles petites brouettes 😎.
Merci à vous deux (Ijim et Michel) pour toutes ces infos très détaillées.
Il ne me reste plus qu'à attendre le 19...
P.S. : si jamais vous entendez parler de la mise en service entre temps, n'hésitez pas à enrichir ce topic 😉 !
Il est toujours avantageux de porter un titre nobiliaire. Etre "de quelque chose", ca pose un homme, comme être "de Garenne", ca pose un lapin - Alphonse Allais
Bonne nouvelle pour tous ceux qui partent vers Punta Cana prochainement : Jetair me fait savoir que mon vol (en date du 19 janvier) se fera avec le nouvel appareil.
Oublions donc les Tristar et autres appareils qui assuraient cette liaison temporairement 🙂 !
Je tiens à souligner que Jetair a répondu par deux fois de façon très circonstanciée au mail que je leur ai adressé à ce sujet en décembre dernier. Il est existe donc bel et bien un service commercial en cette société, ce qui ne semble pas être le cas du côté de leur concurrent direct Thomas Cook qui lui, se fiche pas mal de ses futurs ex-clients 😉 !
Il est toujours avantageux de porter un titre nobiliaire. Etre "de quelque chose", ca pose un homme, comme être "de Garenne", ca pose un lapin - Alphonse Allais
Je ferai part de mes commentaires à mon retour; reste en ligne !
😉
Il est toujours avantageux de porter un titre nobiliaire. Etre "de quelque chose", ca pose un homme, comme être "de Garenne", ca pose un lapin - Alphonse Allais
😠Malheureusement le nouvel appareil promit par TUI BELGUIM pour les caraibes n'a pas été mit en service le 12 janvier comme prévu et ce 14 janvier le vol (CANCUN via VARADERO) est encore effectué par l'antique tristar portugais.
Toi Willcox qui part prochainement vers la RD avec JETAIR, donne nous des nouvelles dès ton retour, j'espère pour toi que tu aura la chance de voler dans un avion neuf (si on peut dire ! le fameux 767 300 tant promit depuis des mois).
Et oui! Dur pour ce "nouveau" 737 de faire son 1er vol !
Il avait été reporté du 12 au 15 (demain) mais une nlle fois déplacé à une date inconnue, a ce jour, suite a des pb techniques !
Le Trisatr de Euroatlantic est dors et déjà prévu par TUB jusqu'u 16 janvier inclus mais apres ?
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Comme tu l'écris les vols du nouvel appareil TUI 767 300 sont reportés pour problèmes techniques, déjà des problèmes techniques et il n'est pas encore en service, ça promet pour la suite🤪
Michel si tu avait par hasard des bonnes nouvelles à ce sujet merci de nous prévenir.
je laisse willcox repondre aux horaires, par contre en ce qui concerne le type d'avion je crains que tu ne le connaisse qu'au moment d'embarquer. Le 767-300 n'est tjrs pas opérationnel a ce jour (16/01) il est prévu en vols d'essais demain 17/01 ensuite ? il est a BRU depuis Noel!!
Pour ce WE, TUI B a affreté en plus du Trisatr portugais, un A310 a la Cie française Eagle Aviation
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
J'ignore sur quel avion. Jetair m'avait confirmé par mail il y a 10 jours que ce serait sur le 767-300, mais vu qu'à aujourd'hui c'est toujours sur le tristar...
😉
Il est toujours avantageux de porter un titre nobiliaire. Etre "de quelque chose", ca pose un homme, comme être "de Garenne", ca pose un lapin - Alphonse Allais
Le Tristar Euroatlantic Aw est mis en place pour TUB à nouveau pour les 18 et 19 janvier, visiblement c'est au coup par coup que TUB affrete cet appareil cela signifie je pense une mise en service du 767-300 maintenant proche.
Ce n'est pas facile de mettre en service un nouvel appareil !
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Ce 26 janvier 2005 (voir site www.brusselsairport.be) le vol TUB 8635 PUERTO PLATA via PUNTA CANA affrété par JETAIR est semble t-il un 767 (va savoir si c'est le nouvel appareil TUI airlines Belgium ? mystère) je peux te dire que cet avion devait partir à 14 h et il est seulement parti à 19 h 09 (+ de 5 heures de retard😠)
C'est pas la joie !
Je crois qu'on en saura plus quand Willcox sera rentré de RD, il est parti le 19 janvier et je crois qu'il rentre le 31.
A priori ce n'est pas le 767 de TUI Belgum qui n'est tjrs pas opérationnel mais un767 de la Cie portugaise Euro Atlantic il serait aussi affreté pour les 28 et 29 janvier. Pour ce qui est du 767-300 de TUB les infos sont assez contradictoires elles vont de "appareil en essais" a mise en service repousséee suite a des pb techniques avec des dates parfois tres lointaines. Je pense que seul l'admministration de l'aviation civile belge pourrait répondre, et encore!
C'esr donc pour le moment soit le Trisatar dont il a souvent été question ici soi un 767 de la Cie Euro Atlantic qui oprèrent les vols mais les decisons semblent prises qu'au jour le jour !
Un 767 de Holland Belgium ets aussi affreté par TUIB (26 et 27 !!!)
Pas simple à gérer pour les TO
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Je crois qu'il va falloir vous armer de patience pour voir "le 767" de TUI Bel. et surtout ne plus vous poser de question sur l'appareil que vous aller avoir.
Pour info sur janvier TUI Belgium a été obligé d'affreter
Tristar Euro Atlantic (le + souvent) 767 Euro Atlantic A310 Air Plus Comet A310 Eagle Aviation 767 Holland Exel
Je pense que le pb actuel est de trouver un avion et ce n'est certainement pas simple
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Vol aller direct en 9h sur le Tristar de Euro Altantic : en VIP, pas de problème, mais en éco c'était galère m'a-t-on dit (1 wc opérationnel sur 4 avec fuite d'eau et bain de pieds assuré, fils électriques dénudés dans la cabine, pas de film durant le vol, etc...)
Retour via Puerto Plata (en 9h20 au départ de PP) sur un 767-300 de Euro Atlantic : RAS.
Pour info : Jetair m'avait assuré par mail le 7/01 que les vols se feraient sur le nouvel appareil, mais que le vol serait de 11h30 à cause des réglements ETOPS.
Il est toujours avantageux de porter un titre nobiliaire. Etre "de quelque chose", ca pose un homme, comme être "de Garenne", ca pose un lapin - Alphonse Allais
Il est toujours avantageux de porter un titre nobiliaire. Etre "de quelque chose", ca pose un homme, comme être "de Garenne", ca pose un lapin - Alphonse Allais
ouiles réglèments étops concernaient ton vol (TUI nouvel appareil 767) que JETAIR t'avait promit pour ton départ. Mais comme tu est parti avec le vieux tristar portugais, il n'avait pas besoin de réglements étops lui.
Effectivement Maxima, le vieux Tristar nous a fait gagner 2h30 de vol !
Pas si mal pour un coucou qui devrait être déclassé depuis près 25 ans (m'a-t-on dit).
Quant au retour sur le 767-300 d'Euro Atlantic, il a mis 20 mn de plus au départ de Puerto Plata. Si je me rappelle bien ce que j'ai lu sur la fiche technique dans l'avion, la vitesse de croisière du Tristar est de 900 km/h, celle du 767-300 de 880 km/h.
Mais Michel va sûrement nous en dire plus là-dessus 😉.
Il est toujours avantageux de porter un titre nobiliaire. Etre "de quelque chose", ca pose un homme, comme être "de Garenne", ca pose un lapin - Alphonse Allais
Le Tristar est un des meilleurs avions .... de son époque !!
Sur une transat les vents et la route choisis (souvent en fonction des vents dailleurs) sont plus significatifs que la vitesse de l'appreil lui même pour le temps de vols car 900 ou 880 c'est idem
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Quelqu'un peut me dire où je peux trouver des détails (configuration des sièges, comfort class, multimedia pendant le vol etc...) sur la "nouveau" machine 767 de Jetair?
Oui...1er vol demain....c'est l'info qui circule mais comme je l'ai dis j'ai utilisé le conditionnel, ça cghange des infos très pessimistes parfois lues.
Config je pense le mieux est de voir chez Jet Air /TUI B car ce n'est pas je pense la config std 767, j'ai pris une fois un 767 de Britannia (TUI aussi ) c'etait assez "charter"
Dur dur le Tp aérien en ce moment car si TUI B a des PB c'est pire chez Corsair (TUI aussi ) qui attend les 1er de ses B 747-700 depuis pas mal de temps !
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Oui
J'espère pour TUI Belgium et tout ceux qui se preparent a partir même si moi personellement j'ai encore des doutes, le 1er vol a tellement été reporté.
A presque 20 h (en France) il reste prévu demain matin!
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
la saga continue, le vol TUB 8551 pour CANCUN via Keklavik, via Montréal, via Varadero prévu départ prévu BRUXELLES 6 h 10 est déjà retardé à 13 heures. Voir www.brusselsairport.be
Il va en faire des escales, le temps de vol va etre augmenté de plusieurs heures !!!
Voilà les dernières infos à 22 h 55 ce 3 février 2005.
Bonsoir
MAXIMA
ps : ce doit etre un boeing 752, donc ce n'est pas le nouvel appareil tui airlines Belgium !!!
Exact c'est un B757 200 de la Cie Icelandair et il est obligé de faire des escales compte tenu son rayon d'action, je suppose qu'au dernier moment il n'y avait pas bcp de choix en appareil disponible
Hier soir a 20 h cette info n'etait pas sur le site de BRU AP ni sur celui qui annonçait le "1er vol" du 767 TUB, c'est environ vers 22h hier soir que l'info du report a nouveau a été annoncée
C'est vraiement la poisse chez TUI B et c'est fini je ne donne plus d'info sur ce vol c'est IRREEL meme si il faut reconnaitre que le Cie prend certainement une bonne decision si le 767 n'est pas pret !
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Ayant, lu, beaucoups de critiques concernant le 767 de cette compagnie, quelqu'un pourrait-il me donner plus d'infos à propos de cet appareil. Cela fait quand…
Rappel Age 60 ans utilise CPAP (appareil médical pour apnées du sommeil indispensable depuis 14 ans). Après une longue absence sur le forum, permettez-moi…
J'ai cru entendre qu'il y a des rumeurs de grèves chez TUI pour les vacances de Paques. (extrait de journaux flamands) Ch'est pour eux le départ de la période…
Bonjour
Je prévois de voyager cet hiver à travers l'Inde. Départ début décembre, retour en France à la mi-avril.
Ma préoccupation principale est de trouver La companie aérienne qui assure cet aller-retour avec le moins de soucis possibles sur les annulations ou les changements d'horaires de vol. Le contexte géopolitique agité au Moyen-Orient ne m'aide pas dans cette recherche, les avis récents lus en ligne sur les compagnies des États du Gulf décrivent pas mal de galères vécues ces derniers mois.
Les vols directs Paris-Delhi A/R que proposent Air France ou Air India sont probablement les plus sûrs mais pas les moins chers !
Dans ce doute, je patiente encore pour finaliser cet achat de billet... Avec peut-être quelques conseils et avis d'expériences des amoureux des Zindes sur VoyageForum.
Merci et Bons Voyages à tous.
Hi,
I’m thinking of heading to Malaysia soon.
I’ve seen some great prices and direct flights from Paris with Malaysia Airlines.
Is it a reliable airline?
Thanks for your feedback!
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August.
My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Hi there,
We had planned a trip to Sicily in August, and due to the volcanic eruption of Mount Etna, my flight was canceled. The airline is refunding the outbound flight, but none of the non-refundable expenses: accommodation booked through Booking, rental car, and the return flight aren’t covered. My SUPER Gold card doesn’t work in this specific case! :( If anyone has been in this situation, could you let me know if you were able to get any recourse and, if so, how?
Thanks in advance
I’ve been traveling regularly for over twenty years,
but this is the first time an airline has treated me as poorly as Air France.
Two trips, two problems. The latest:
Trip from Seoul to Rennes. Last leg from Paris CDG to Rennes with Air France.
I arrive in Paris and go straight to Air France to get my boarding pass to Rennes. They assure me my baggage is continuing to Rennes.
Arriving in Rennes, no baggage—same as five other people.
The Air France office is closed, and the airport staff tell me there’s rarely anyone there.
With the help of the airport staff, I file a claim online, and my baggage is almost immediately located. As a result, I’m told I’ll have it the next day.
Four days later, the baggage is still in the same place at CDG—nothing’s moving.
The problem is Air France has no customer service. What they call customer service is a department that takes an hour to answer and just repeats what’s on the online form. No coordination, no way to get things moving. I guess Air France would rather pay the compensation after 21 days than actually do something.
I’ve had lost baggage on other trips, but this is the first time I’ve seen such indifference and lack of professionalism.
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi,
I booked an Etihad ticket on their website for Dusseldorf-Abu Dhabi. In the first name field, I entered all my first names (something I never do and I regret it, but the site was confusing). Everything is spelled correctly, but the problem is that I just received my new passport and only my first two first names and the first letter of the third appear—there’s no trace of the last one.
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in.
Thanks for your feedback!
Hi everyone,
Next January, I’m heading to India.
My outbound flight is with Emirates from Paris to Dubai, then another Emirates flight from Dubai to Calcutta.
Could anyone tell me how the connection works? I’ve heard there’s a dedicated Emirates zone, but how does it actually work in practice—I’ve got a 2-hour layover.
Thanks so much!
Take care.
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon.
I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport.
Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…).
AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly.
On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double!
In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others?
Given the price difference, I’m hesitant…
Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go?
Thanks,
HERVE
Hi everyone, I’ve unfortunately only just noticed that I booked two flight tickets, but I made a mistake on the second first name. Basically, my computer auto-filled and typed my first name twice, so both tickets are in my first name. Only the last names—mine and my friend’s—are correct.
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common).
I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows:
- Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes;
- A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late;
- Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens);
- Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight;
- If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation;
- The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason;
- In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/
Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed.
- Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps.
- Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation.
- If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/
- If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed.
- The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt.
- Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont.
- Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia.
Sincerely,
Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding.
Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage...
Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket.
On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata
On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto
I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer.
Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine.
I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket?
(It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania.
The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines.
So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers.
Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this.
Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops.
Do any of you have updates?
Thanks!
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG.
Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover?
We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker).
We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA.
For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai.
Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)?
We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one).
The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much!
I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul?
I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace.
It’s this model:
https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?