Et oui une fois de plus les ricains nous ont montré leur débilité ils ont envoyé un B777-200 LR (Long range) pour un HONG KONG--LONDRE soit 21.500 kilomètres. L'appareil est parti hier à 15h30 de Hong Kong et devrait se poser hier à Londres à 14h30 étrange, il faudrait quand même voir à pas nous prendre pour des billes ! La ligne Hong Kong-Londres mesure exactement 9.740 kilomètres.??? Certes par l'ouest seulement, ils passent par l'est. Ah bon ? Et à quoi sert-cela ? A faire un essai de très long courrier, sûrement... Mais alors à quoi bon faire 21500km ba a rien!!!! si on compare à la circonférence de notre planète par l’équateur. Coluche prétendait-il, du temps où sévissait à l'Est la dictature communiste, que le Russe le plus malchanceux était Youri Gagarine car, ayant fait dix-sept fois le tour de la Terre, il était retombé en URSS... Et quel plaisir de rester dans un avion +de 20H on en redemande...
B777 le record le plus américain
by Morgan6522
This discussion is in French, the community’s main language.
Original post
Le Record le plus Américain du monde,
Et oui une fois de plus les ricains nous ont montré leur débilité ils ont envoyé un B777-200 LR (Long range) pour un HONG KONG--LONDRE soit 21.500 kilomètres. L'appareil est parti hier à 15h30 de Hong Kong et devrait se poser hier à Londres à 14h30 étrange, il faudrait quand même voir à pas nous prendre pour des billes ! La ligne Hong Kong-Londres mesure exactement 9.740 kilomètres.??? Certes par l'ouest seulement, ils passent par l'est. Ah bon ? Et à quoi sert-cela ? A faire un essai de très long courrier, sûrement... Mais alors à quoi bon faire 21500km ba a rien!!!! si on compare à la circonférence de notre planète par l’équateur. Coluche prétendait-il, du temps où sévissait à l'Est la dictature communiste, que le Russe le plus malchanceux était Youri Gagarine car, ayant fait dix-sept fois le tour de la Terre, il était retombé en URSS... Et quel plaisir de rester dans un avion +de 20H on en redemande...
Et oui une fois de plus les ricains nous ont montré leur débilité ils ont envoyé un B777-200 LR (Long range) pour un HONG KONG--LONDRE soit 21.500 kilomètres. L'appareil est parti hier à 15h30 de Hong Kong et devrait se poser hier à Londres à 14h30 étrange, il faudrait quand même voir à pas nous prendre pour des billes ! La ligne Hong Kong-Londres mesure exactement 9.740 kilomètres.??? Certes par l'ouest seulement, ils passent par l'est. Ah bon ? Et à quoi sert-cela ? A faire un essai de très long courrier, sûrement... Mais alors à quoi bon faire 21500km ba a rien!!!! si on compare à la circonférence de notre planète par l’équateur. Coluche prétendait-il, du temps où sévissait à l'Est la dictature communiste, que le Russe le plus malchanceux était Youri Gagarine car, ayant fait dix-sept fois le tour de la Terre, il était retombé en URSS... Et quel plaisir de rester dans un avion +de 20H on en redemande...
D'une unitilité totale commercialement 22h dans un avion ????
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Oui bon bah c'est du marketing...tout comme Airbus avec l'A340-200 il y a quelques années (bon ça commence à faire vieux quand même😉). Bref avec des perfs comme ça, ils vont peut etre réussir à tuer complètement le 340-500, par exemple chez Singapore Airlines...Ce serait pas la première fois😉
C' est bien sur plus pour leur prestige que pour le coté pratique de ce vol, en réponse à Airbus avec leur vol Singapour-New York.
Et bien moi, je préfère l’aéronef « Oie du Canada » qui sait faire jusqu’à 900 km par jour lorsqu’elle migre en Floride.
Elle le fait par ses propres moyens (à la force des ses ailes) sans passer par la case Irak pour y faire le plein !
J’aurais bien parlé des cigognes, mais il parait qu’il ne faut pas parler sexe ici.
Elle le fait par ses propres moyens (à la force des ses ailes) sans passer par la case Irak pour y faire le plein !
J’aurais bien parlé des cigognes, mais il parait qu’il ne faut pas parler sexe ici.
Le Record le plus Américain du monde,
Et oui une fois de plus les ricains nous ont montré leur débilité ils ont envoyé un B777-200 LR (Long range) pour un HONG KONG--LONDRE soit 21.500 kilomètres. L'appareil est parti hier à 15h30 de Hong Kong et devrait se poser hier à Londres à 14h30 étrange, il faudrait quand même voir à pas nous prendre pour des billes ! La ligne Hong Kong-Londres mesure exactement 9.740 kilomètres.??? Certes par l'ouest seulement, ils passent par l'est. Ah bon ? Et à quoi sert-cela ? A faire un essai de très long courrier, sûrement... Mais alors à quoi bon faire 21500km ba a rien!!!! si on compare à la circonférence de notre planète par l’équateur. Coluche prétendait-il, du temps où sévissait à l'Est la dictature communiste, que le Russe le plus malchanceux était Youri Gagarine car, ayant fait dix-sept fois le tour de la Terre, il était retombé en URSS... Et quel plaisir de rester dans un avion +de 20H on en redemande...
Ce n'est pas bien de faire de la paraphrase...
Et oui une fois de plus les ricains nous ont montré leur débilité ils ont envoyé un B777-200 LR (Long range) pour un HONG KONG--LONDRE soit 21.500 kilomètres. L'appareil est parti hier à 15h30 de Hong Kong et devrait se poser hier à Londres à 14h30 étrange, il faudrait quand même voir à pas nous prendre pour des billes ! La ligne Hong Kong-Londres mesure exactement 9.740 kilomètres.??? Certes par l'ouest seulement, ils passent par l'est. Ah bon ? Et à quoi sert-cela ? A faire un essai de très long courrier, sûrement... Mais alors à quoi bon faire 21500km ba a rien!!!! si on compare à la circonférence de notre planète par l’équateur. Coluche prétendait-il, du temps où sévissait à l'Est la dictature communiste, que le Russe le plus malchanceux était Youri Gagarine car, ayant fait dix-sept fois le tour de la Terre, il était retombé en URSS... Et quel plaisir de rester dans un avion +de 20H on en redemande...
Ce n'est pas bien de faire de la paraphrase...
Je ne suis pas d'accord avec cette approche, , je ne suis pas spécialement pro américain et je ne bosse pas chez Airbus.
Toutefois pour info, Airbus va faire quasiment la même chose avec le 380 dans les prochaines semaines et cela ne me choque pas.
Tout cela relève d'une stratégie commerciale et en fin de compte c'est du bisness pur et dur et c'est comme ça dans l' époque où nous sommes.
On peut le regretter mais......
Tout cela relève d'une stratégie commerciale et en fin de compte c'est du bisness pur et dur et c'est comme ça dans l' époque où nous sommes.
On peut le regretter mais......
Bonjour,
Certes, mais on a tout le même le droit, je dirais même le devoir moral de démythifier et démystifier ce genre de projet et ce genre de communication. Le raisonnement qui consiste à prendre acte d'une dérive - le bussiness - et à l'admettre au nom du fait accompli et de l'air du temps me semble bien complice.
Michel
Certes, mais on a tout le même le droit, je dirais même le devoir moral de démythifier et démystifier ce genre de projet et ce genre de communication. Le raisonnement qui consiste à prendre acte d'une dérive - le bussiness - et à l'admettre au nom du fait accompli et de l'air du temps me semble bien complice.
Michel
22 heures de vol direct c’est quand même mieux qu’un vol New York-Singapoure de 30 heures avec les escales! Ou un vol Paris-Papeete ou Nouméa de plus de 30 heures également. L’homme d’affaire, dont le temps est compté, économise une nuit d’hôtel et 8 à 10 heures de temps perdus dans les aéroports. Une journée de travail! Voila le marché à mon avis que Boeing vise.
L’homme d’affaire a parfois besoin de vacances lui aussi. Une fois ‘’le’’ contrat signé il se paie une semaine de congé Montréal-Hong Kong, un jour à l’aller, cinq à faire la fête et un jour pour revenir au boulot. Et le voila prêt à s’attaquer au contrat suivant!
Plus tard, une fois ces circuits bien rodés, les ‘’pôvres’’ touristes (çà existe) qui n’ont que 8 à 10 jours de congé annuel feront la file à l’embarquement. On ne parle pas ici de progrès mais de possibilités qui peuvent faire l’affaire d’une certaine clientèle.
DeCléricy
L’homme d’affaire a parfois besoin de vacances lui aussi. Une fois ‘’le’’ contrat signé il se paie une semaine de congé Montréal-Hong Kong, un jour à l’aller, cinq à faire la fête et un jour pour revenir au boulot. Et le voila prêt à s’attaquer au contrat suivant!
Plus tard, une fois ces circuits bien rodés, les ‘’pôvres’’ touristes (çà existe) qui n’ont que 8 à 10 jours de congé annuel feront la file à l’embarquement. On ne parle pas ici de progrès mais de possibilités qui peuvent faire l’affaire d’une certaine clientèle.
DeCléricy
J’en appelle à vous ô Muses
Où tant ma vie passe et s’use
Qu’encore et toujours j’aime
Mes soeurs Galère et Bohème
Bjr
lorsque l'on regarde en Km soit 21601 ce record n'a aucune réalité "commerciale" car le maximun entre deux point sur terre doit etre de 18 500 /19 000 km
De plus record a été réalisé avec 35 passagers a bord, avec 301 passagers (sa capacité selon Boeing) on retourne vers 16 700 km
Alors oui c'est un record mais rien d'autre
Dailleurs les ventes de 777 se font plus dans le -300 ER qui emporte plus de passagers sur moins de distance que ce -200 LR c'est ce que Air Canada aurait recement choisi comme type 777-300 ER
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
18 000 à 19 000 Kms c’est valable pour un vol à une altitude moyenne de 2 000 mètres. Comment il va faire ton vol pour ‘’enjamber’’ les Alpes ou les Rocheuses de l’ouest américain ou encore les Andes? Les vols transcontinentaux se font plutôt à une altitude moyenne comprise entre 7 000 et 9 000 mètres. Ce qui donne une circonférence de 69 000 kilomètres minimum! Donc 34 500 kilomètres pour une demi circonférence non?
Si on élimine les étapes de montée et descente pour atteindre le point A au point B diamétralement opposés on obtient tout de même un vol de plus 25 000 kilomètres soit à peu près l’équivalent de la circonférence de la terre ou si tu préfères un vol au ras des pâquerettes! Donc 21 601 kilomètres réalisé avec ce B777 ne sont pas encore suffisant pour rallier New York et son opposé (quelque part dans l’océan Indien) à une altitude moyenne de 7 000 mètres.
DeCléricy
Si on élimine les étapes de montée et descente pour atteindre le point A au point B diamétralement opposés on obtient tout de même un vol de plus 25 000 kilomètres soit à peu près l’équivalent de la circonférence de la terre ou si tu préfères un vol au ras des pâquerettes! Donc 21 601 kilomètres réalisé avec ce B777 ne sont pas encore suffisant pour rallier New York et son opposé (quelque part dans l’océan Indien) à une altitude moyenne de 7 000 mètres.
DeCléricy
J’en appelle à vous ô Muses
Où tant ma vie passe et s’use
Qu’encore et toujours j’aime
Mes soeurs Galère et Bohème
ahh ! Merci. Non vraiment merci car là, je me suis beaucoup amusé. 69000 kilomètres de circonférence à une altitude de vol comprise entre 7000 et 9000 mètres ??!!?? Là, chapeau.
Alors pour ne pas faire durer le suspense, je vais te donner trois indices secrets pour refaire tes calculs :
1/ Les avions long-courriers croisent à une altitude comprise entre 8000m (au début du vol) et rapidement 11000 voire 12000 mètres. 2/ 1 kilomètre = 1000 mètres 3/ Le rayon MAX de la terre est de 6378 km.
bonne chance !
😏😏😏
Alors pour ne pas faire durer le suspense, je vais te donner trois indices secrets pour refaire tes calculs :
1/ Les avions long-courriers croisent à une altitude comprise entre 8000m (au début du vol) et rapidement 11000 voire 12000 mètres. 2/ 1 kilomètre = 1000 mètres 3/ Le rayon MAX de la terre est de 6378 km.
bonne chance !
😏😏😏
Albathor je dois avouer candidement que je me suis royalement fourvoyé! Dans mes calculs j’ai mélangé miles et kilomètres. Toute mon éducation et plus tard mon travail dans l’industrie du bâtiment font que j’utilise encore et toujours le système de mesure anglaise (mile et pied). De mémoire je savais que la circonférence de la terre est de 25 000 miles et non 25 000 kilomètres (1 mètre = 3, 2808 pieds) tel que mentionné dans mon post précédent. Comme quoi on a toujours besoin de plus jeune que sois!😕
Toutefois je maintiens mon argumentation; à savoir que le record de 21 601 kilomètres n’est pas suffisant pour rallier New York et son opposé à une altitude moyenne de 7 000 mètres. À plus forte raison si j’utilise ton 8 000 mètres dans le calcul.
S’il te plaît si je m’entête à nouveau corrige moi en messagerie privée! Ca devient honteux pour moi!🤪
DeCléricy
Toutefois je maintiens mon argumentation; à savoir que le record de 21 601 kilomètres n’est pas suffisant pour rallier New York et son opposé à une altitude moyenne de 7 000 mètres. À plus forte raison si j’utilise ton 8 000 mètres dans le calcul.
S’il te plaît si je m’entête à nouveau corrige moi en messagerie privée! Ca devient honteux pour moi!🤪
DeCléricy
J’en appelle à vous ô Muses
Où tant ma vie passe et s’use
Qu’encore et toujours j’aime
Mes soeurs Galère et Bohème
Bonjour,
Etonné je suis...que aucun de vous n'ait remarqué que cet "exploit" du 777-200ER ait été fait juste avant l'arrivée de l'A380 chez son premier client (Singapour). Business comme déjà dit ci-dessus 😠 Bien d'accord que ces 22h de vol ne prouvent rien....après tout Steve Fossett a bien fait un TdM sans escale...lui !! et en solo encore !! N'empêche que Singapore Airlines est plutôt fumace du retard de livraison de son premier A380.... Quant à l'opinion des passagers à propos des risques de thrombose en restant assis comme des sardines pendant 22 heures ?? Lorsque Mr. Boeing aura fait un supersonique de 300 places capable de faire Londres/Sydney sans se poser et en quelques heures, alors là oui je soulèverai mon chapeau !
Etonné je suis...que aucun de vous n'ait remarqué que cet "exploit" du 777-200ER ait été fait juste avant l'arrivée de l'A380 chez son premier client (Singapour). Business comme déjà dit ci-dessus 😠 Bien d'accord que ces 22h de vol ne prouvent rien....après tout Steve Fossett a bien fait un TdM sans escale...lui !! et en solo encore !! N'empêche que Singapore Airlines est plutôt fumace du retard de livraison de son premier A380.... Quant à l'opinion des passagers à propos des risques de thrombose en restant assis comme des sardines pendant 22 heures ?? Lorsque Mr. Boeing aura fait un supersonique de 300 places capable de faire Londres/Sydney sans se poser et en quelques heures, alors là oui je soulèverai mon chapeau !
Si vous ne réussissez jamais rien du premier coup, n'essayez pas le parachutisme !
Albathor avait oublié de te donner le 4ème indice secret, celui qui permet de mesurer une circonférence. Allez, en exclusivité, je te donne la formule magique: 2 x Pi x rayon.
Tu constateras qu'en prenant le rayon maximum de la terre, et en ajoutant 8, 10, 12 ou même 20 kilomètres d'altitude (pour les avions les plus futuristes), ça ne change pas grand chose à la circonférence de la terre, ou à la distance parcourue par l'avion.
Pour que les 21.500 kilomètres représentent exactement la moitié d'une circonférence terrestre, il faut voler à ... 470 kilomètres d'altitude. Le jour où les "avions" de ligne voleront à cette altitude, on peut imaginer que la durée du vol et la distance maximale ne seront plus vraiment un problème. 😉
Par contre, avoir une capacité de vol supérieure à la moitié d'une circonférence terrestre peut présenter un certain intérêt dans la mesure où il faut bien prévoir une marge de sécurité en cas de problème imprévu à destination, quand la destination est aux antipodes. Et comme qqun l'a déjà souligné ici, ça ne concernait pas un avion plein. Je pense que peu de compagnies affrêteraient un boeing sur une telle distance avec seulement 30 passagers à bord.
Tu constateras qu'en prenant le rayon maximum de la terre, et en ajoutant 8, 10, 12 ou même 20 kilomètres d'altitude (pour les avions les plus futuristes), ça ne change pas grand chose à la circonférence de la terre, ou à la distance parcourue par l'avion.
Pour que les 21.500 kilomètres représentent exactement la moitié d'une circonférence terrestre, il faut voler à ... 470 kilomètres d'altitude. Le jour où les "avions" de ligne voleront à cette altitude, on peut imaginer que la durée du vol et la distance maximale ne seront plus vraiment un problème. 😉
Par contre, avoir une capacité de vol supérieure à la moitié d'une circonférence terrestre peut présenter un certain intérêt dans la mesure où il faut bien prévoir une marge de sécurité en cas de problème imprévu à destination, quand la destination est aux antipodes. Et comme qqun l'a déjà souligné ici, ça ne concernait pas un avion plein. Je pense que peu de compagnies affrêteraient un boeing sur une telle distance avec seulement 30 passagers à bord.
Juste préciser que le trajet le plus long pour rejoindre deux points est d'environ 19.000km (demi cercle terrestre).
L'objectif de Boeing est de faire parler la marque, quant à la liaison Hong Kong-Londres vers l'Est (on ne veut pas prendre de raccourci), elle n'a de sens que ce fameux 21500km, et le chiffre parle mieux sur la capacité de l'avion. Boeing peut crier qu'il peut faire plus que le demi cercle terrestre.
Mais là où il y a triche, c'est le nombre de passager et on peut parier que les soutes sont vides, que les tanks sont pleines à ras bord.
Ce qui est irrationnel alors, c'est qu'on a transporté bcp de fuel qui sert à porter le fuel lui-même, qui à son tour sert à porter un avion quasi vide...c'est économiquement suicidaire mais pas mal pour un coup de pub.
De plus, la législation internationale impose une certaine quantité de fuel disponible à l'arrivée pour ce quadrimoteur (donc, l'avion peut encore aller plus loin avec un poids donné!!) en cas de déviation vers un aérodrome alternate ou en cas d'encombrement à l'arrivée ou en cas de contingence.
De plus, la législation internationale impose une certaine quantité de fuel disponible à l'arrivée pour ce quadrimoteur (donc, l'avion peut encore aller plus loin avec un poids donné!!) en cas de déviation vers un aérodrome alternate ou en cas d'encombrement à l'arrivée ou en cas de contingence.
wang
bonjour
Ces lignes tres longs courriers connaissent peu de succes commerciales car seule la singapore airlines s'en sort avec de maigres benefices contrairement a la thai qui remet en cause ce concept car elle perd de l'argent.Ce marche reste helas limite par exemple londre/sydney ou l'A340-500 peut repondre en terme de distances mais pas en terme de capacite et ce sera le meme probleme pour la mise en service du 777-200er. Boeing ne fait que repondre a airbus peut etre par soucis d etre a la page technologique ce que ne la rend pas moins commercialement mythomane par rapport a la reelle demande.
Ces lignes tres longs courriers connaissent peu de succes commerciales car seule la singapore airlines s'en sort avec de maigres benefices contrairement a la thai qui remet en cause ce concept car elle perd de l'argent.Ce marche reste helas limite par exemple londre/sydney ou l'A340-500 peut repondre en terme de distances mais pas en terme de capacite et ce sera le meme probleme pour la mise en service du 777-200er. Boeing ne fait que repondre a airbus peut etre par soucis d etre a la page technologique ce que ne la rend pas moins commercialement mythomane par rapport a la reelle demande.
Le problème entre le système métrique et son pendant anglais est qu’albathor lui il raisonne comme un maître et moi comme un pied!😕
DeCléricy
Superbe! 😉🙂
DeCléricy
Superbe! 😉🙂
Je n’ai aucun mérite albathor, le Grand Maître de la réplique sur VF c’est CHRISTIAN06.
J’essaie d’atteindre sa cheville mais généralement je me cantonne au talon!
DeCléricy
J’essaie d’atteindre sa cheville mais généralement je me cantonne au talon!
DeCléricy
J’en appelle à vous ô Muses
Où tant ma vie passe et s’use
Qu’encore et toujours j’aime
Mes soeurs Galère et Bohème
Environ 9litres/km pour le bimoteur qui a réalisé le vol record HKG-EGLL.
ça doit faire pas loin de 200.000 litres.
wang
les vols longs peuvent parfois entrainer des comportement ahurissants
article paru ce jour dans un site d'aviation civile www eurocockpit point com
Une passagère tente d'ouvrir la porte d'un avion en plein vol pour fumer -
C'est à bord d'un vol Cathay Pacific entre Hong Kong et Brisbane que Sandrine Hélène Sellies, 34 ans, a eu cette 'idée' samedi dernier; elle comparait aujourd'hui devant le tribunal (en Australie). Sous l'emprise d'alcool et de somnifères pour apaiser ses angoisses de l'avion, et par ailleurs somnanbule, la jeune femme a plaidé coupable mais affirme ne se souvenir de rien...
article paru ce jour dans un site d'aviation civile www eurocockpit point com
Une passagère tente d'ouvrir la porte d'un avion en plein vol pour fumer -
C'est à bord d'un vol Cathay Pacific entre Hong Kong et Brisbane que Sandrine Hélène Sellies, 34 ans, a eu cette 'idée' samedi dernier; elle comparait aujourd'hui devant le tribunal (en Australie). Sous l'emprise d'alcool et de somnifères pour apaiser ses angoisses de l'avion, et par ailleurs somnanbule, la jeune femme a plaidé coupable mais affirme ne se souvenir de rien...
Log in first, then come back to this page.
You might also like
Storm in the Canary Islands
New adventures from Perpignan to Ranchi (Jharkhand)
Breathtaking Kyrgyzstan!
Argentine and Chilean Patagonia from El Calafate to Ushuaia
Turkey 2026: Riviera, Antalya, and Cappadocia
Page by Page on the Assisi Way – 1,200 km on Foot
How to nail your trek in wet climates: which pants keep you truly dry?
Densha Otaku - Lesser-Known Regions
More discussions
Bonjour à toutes et tous
Janvier prochain, je vais en Inde
Mon vol aller est sur Emirates de Paris à Dubaï puis de nouveau autre avion Emirates de Dubaï à Calcutta
Qui pourrait me dire comment se passe ce changement, il semble qu'il y ait une zone réservée Emirates, mais comment cela se passe-t-il dans les faits - on a 2 h d'escale
Merci à toutes et tous
Prenez soin de vous.
Hi everyone, I’ve unfortunately only just noticed that I booked two flight tickets, but I made a mistake on the second first name. Basically, my computer auto-filled and typed my first name twice, so both tickets are in my first name. Only the last names—mine and my friend’s—are correct.
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common). I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common). I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
Great news for those heading to Bahia / Salvador toward the end of the year.
Air France plans to increase flights from 3 to 5 during the December 2026 / February 2027 period.
Original source: Salvador terá mais voos diretos para Paris durante o verão; veja o que muda | Jornal Correio 1
Tropical greetings from Salvador,
@IvanBahiaGuide
(local specialist, active on the French-speaking Brazil Forums for over 16 years now)
Hello,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi there,
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
Hi,
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
Hi there,
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
Hi,
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
Hi,
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
Hello,
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
Hello,
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Hi everyone,
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
Hi there!
Has anyone taken the direct flight from CDG to Las Vegas with Air France?
Looking forward to your feedback!
Hey everyone,
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
Hi there,
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric
Hi there,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
Hi there,
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry
Hi there,
I have a question...
Has anyone managed to get a refund from Oman Air?
After a delayed flight, we missed our connecting flight to get home!! At midnight, the flight attendant booked us on a flight to Nice via Munich, even though we were in Munich and wanted to get back to Nice... Too tired from the trip, we didn’t notice the mistake!! The next day, of course, the booking wasn’t valid!! We had to pay again for the flight back to Nice... I’m really struggling!! I think they’re giving me the runaround!! I’ve sent several emails, tried Messenger and WhatsApp, but the only responses I get are: "We need to investigate!! We’ll get back to you in 15 days!!" It’s been over a month!!
I just sent a registered letter (LRAR) to their office at Paris Charles de Gaulle, which is still open!!
Do you have any other suggestions for me?
Thanks in advance for your help! Virginie
After a delayed flight, we missed our connecting flight to get home!! At midnight, the flight attendant booked us on a flight to Nice via Munich, even though we were in Munich and wanted to get back to Nice... Too tired from the trip, we didn’t notice the mistake!! The next day, of course, the booking wasn’t valid!! We had to pay again for the flight back to Nice... I’m really struggling!! I think they’re giving me the runaround!! I’ve sent several emails, tried Messenger and WhatsApp, but the only responses I get are: "We need to investigate!! We’ll get back to you in 15 days!!" It’s been over a month!!
I just sent a registered letter (LRAR) to their office at Paris Charles de Gaulle, which is still open!!
Do you have any other suggestions for me?
Thanks in advance for your help! Virginie
Hi!
Sri Lanka has announced it could run out of fuel in the coming weeks if the Strait of Hormuz remains blocked. The government has implemented a mandatory four-day workweek to save oil, and there are long lines at gas stations due to fears of an early shortage.
In Vietnam, the government has warned all airlines that flights will need to be reduced due to a lack of kerosene. The country imports two-thirds of its jet fuel from China and Thailand, but both countries have now banned exports out of fear of domestic shortages.
The state is asking airlines to plan ahead and park aircraft to drastically reduce operations, starting with domestic flights and then international ones. International carriers will also need to cut back on their rotations.
This will begin in the coming days. 🙁
Hi there,
I’ve got a long layover (about 10 hours) in Seoul on an upcoming trip.
I arrive from Phnom Penh at 7:20 AM and depart for Montreal at 6:00 PM.
First question: Will my checked baggage be transferred automatically? I have a single ticket from KTI to YUL (Air Canada ticket—KTI-ICN operated by Asiana (codeshare) and ICN-YUL by Air Canada).
Second question: I saw it’s possible to join free guided tours (Airport Transit Tour). What do you think of this kind of service? And is my "actual" layover time (accounting for security checks, check-in, etc.) enough to do one of these tours?
Thanks in advance to everyone who chimes in on this!
First question: Will my checked baggage be transferred automatically? I have a single ticket from KTI to YUL (Air Canada ticket—KTI-ICN operated by Asiana (codeshare) and ICN-YUL by Air Canada).
Second question: I saw it’s possible to join free guided tours (Airport Transit Tour). What do you think of this kind of service? And is my "actual" layover time (accounting for security checks, check-in, etc.) enough to do one of these tours?
Thanks in advance to everyone who chimes in on this!
Hi everyone,
I'm heading to Namibia next May. I'm planning to take a first flight from Paris to Johannesburg with Air France, departing at 11:20 PM and arriving at 11:05 AM in Johannesburg. Then a second flight from Johannesburg to Windhoek at 3:25 PM with South African Airways.
Four hours between the two flights seems enough to catch my connection, but a friend told me I should maybe take the 5:30 PM flight instead because I need to go through immigration, collect my luggage, and check in again. Apparently, I have to do this because I bought the two tickets separately (it's actually much cheaper).
What do you think?
Also, in terms of South African airlines, which one do you think is the most reliable between South African Airways and Airlink?
Thanks for your advice!!
So, even before starting my explanation, I’d like to introduce myself since this is my first post on the forum :) I’m Jérôme, a huge Asia enthusiast, and I’m currently in the process of moving to Japan with my family in 2028.
Now, onto the topic :)
We’re a family of four traveling together to Seoul, with two separate bookings.
Our original itinerary was: Madrid → Doha → Seoul (March 23–24)
The issue is that our entire outbound flight was canceled, and the airline simply rescheduled the Madrid → Doha leg. Now we’re left with an incomplete journey, with no solution to reach our final destination (Seoul).
Since then:
- Can’t modify flights online (technical error every time) - Can’t get help via chat or WhatsApp - Phone support is unreachable, and the usual French number isn’t working right now
We don’t want a refund. We just want to be rerouted to Seoul, as our original ticket promised.
We’re flexible:
- On dates (we can leave on March 21 or 22 instead of the 23rd) - On the itinerary (different layovers if needed)
Have any of you dealt with this before? Do you know how to unlock a booking in this case or get a rerouting? We’re considering going straight to the airport to resolve it at the Qatar Airways counter....
Thanks so much for your help! 😊
Now, onto the topic :)
We’re a family of four traveling together to Seoul, with two separate bookings.
Our original itinerary was: Madrid → Doha → Seoul (March 23–24)
The issue is that our entire outbound flight was canceled, and the airline simply rescheduled the Madrid → Doha leg. Now we’re left with an incomplete journey, with no solution to reach our final destination (Seoul).
Since then:
- Can’t modify flights online (technical error every time) - Can’t get help via chat or WhatsApp - Phone support is unreachable, and the usual French number isn’t working right now
We don’t want a refund. We just want to be rerouted to Seoul, as our original ticket promised.
We’re flexible:
- On dates (we can leave on March 21 or 22 instead of the 23rd) - On the itinerary (different layovers if needed)
Have any of you dealt with this before? Do you know how to unlock a booking in this case or get a rerouting? We’re considering going straight to the airport to resolve it at the Qatar Airways counter....
Thanks so much for your help! 😊