airbus et boeing sont deux très grands constructeurs d'avions. je me suis cependant souvent demandé et j'aimerais beaucoup avoir votre avis sur lequel des deux fabrique les meilleurs avions ? et si on devait faire une comparaison de leurs avions à catégories équivalentes, que diriez vous ? merci
Comparaison entre Airbus et Boeing
by Keuvain
This discussion is in French, the community’s main language.
Original post
bonjour,
airbus et boeing sont deux très grands constructeurs d'avions. je me suis cependant souvent demandé et j'aimerais beaucoup avoir votre avis sur lequel des deux fabrique les meilleurs avions ? et si on devait faire une comparaison de leurs avions à catégories équivalentes, que diriez vous ? merci
airbus et boeing sont deux très grands constructeurs d'avions. je me suis cependant souvent demandé et j'aimerais beaucoup avoir votre avis sur lequel des deux fabrique les meilleurs avions ? et si on devait faire une comparaison de leurs avions à catégories équivalentes, que diriez vous ? merci
08.11 BSL HAM EZS1023 319 / 08.11 HAM BSL EZS1028 319
21.11 BSL SXF EZY4634 319 / 21.11 SXF BSL EZY4637 319
27.11 BSL MUC EZS1005 319 / 27.11 MUC BSL EZS1008 319
Tes A/R sur Hambourg, Berlin ou Munich dans la journée, tu les fais pour ton travail ?
Tes A/R sur Hambourg, Berlin ou Munich dans la journée, tu les fais pour ton travail ?
Personnellement l'avion long courrier que je préfère est le Boeing 777-300ER et en court/moyen courrier j'aime bien les Airbus A3xx.
Est-ce caricatural de dire que Airbus est plus en pointe sur les monocouloirs face a Boeing (A32s contre B737) alors que boeing a une position plus adaptée sur les long courriers (B777 contre A330/A340) ?
Peronnellement j'adore les Airbus A319/A320 que je trouve tres agréable. Par contre ca fait un momment que je n'ai pas pris de Boeing 737, la majorité des compagnies que j'utilise (Air France, Easyjet Switzerland) étant adeptes des Airbus... L'Airbus ne serait il pas dominant dans les compagnies européenes d'ailleurs (je parle des monocouloirs) ?
Peronnellement j'adore les Airbus A319/A320 que je trouve tres agréable. Par contre ca fait un momment que je n'ai pas pris de Boeing 737, la majorité des compagnies que j'utilise (Air France, Easyjet Switzerland) étant adeptes des Airbus... L'Airbus ne serait il pas dominant dans les compagnies européenes d'ailleurs (je parle des monocouloirs) ?
L'Airbus ne serait il pas dominant dans les compagnies européenes d'ailleurs (je parle des monocouloirs) ?
Ryanair n'a que des boeing 737 😛😛
Ryanair n'a que des boeing 737 😛😛
Exact oui !! Ca doit etre la plus grosse flotte de Boeing en ligne en europe dans une compagnie me semble t il !
Mais beaucoup de compagnies pro boeing se sont mises à l'airbus !
Exemple : British Airways, Easyjet, Air Berlin.
Il ne reste pas énormément de compagnies que Boeing,
Meme de nombreuses compagnies charter se mettent à l'Airbus : Aigle Azur, Air Mediterrannée, Star Airlines, Edelweiss, Fly Niki, Condor.
Peut etre est ce qu'une impression...
En effet, sur le court et moyen courrier AF laisse tomber petit a petit ses 737.
A titre perso, pour bosser, je prefere de loin l'Airbus. Je ne parle que du coté pratique de la chose. Tout y est plus facile, et nombreux sont les PNC qui ont hate de voir les vieux 737 partir loin !!!
Pour les compagnies (juste pour info, Aigle Azur n'est pas une compagnie Charter) le mieux est de rationnaliser la flotte en utilisant un seul constructeur, cela reduit les frais d'entretien, de formation et de maintient de compétence des équipages !
A titre perso, pour bosser, je prefere de loin l'Airbus. Je ne parle que du coté pratique de la chose. Tout y est plus facile, et nombreux sont les PNC qui ont hate de voir les vieux 737 partir loin !!!
Pour les compagnies (juste pour info, Aigle Azur n'est pas une compagnie Charter) le mieux est de rationnaliser la flotte en utilisant un seul constructeur, cela reduit les frais d'entretien, de formation et de maintient de compétence des équipages !
😉 tout à fais d 'accord pour dire que airbus est mieux placé sur les avions monocouloirs et que la gamme A318 A319 A320 et A321 correspond à tous les besoins des vols court et moyen couriers.
toutefois les derniers 737 sont egalement tres sympa, mais peu present en Europe. 737.600 737.800 me semble t-il.
si mon souvenir est bon sur IY j'ai volé sur un 737.800 et c'etait tres moderne, tres confort ( peu de bruit ect....)
sur LC : ma preference va vraiment sur le 777.300 !! aujourd'hui : c'est vraiment le meilleur avion !!!
a tous bon voyage😉😉
toutefois les derniers 737 sont egalement tres sympa, mais peu present en Europe. 737.600 737.800 me semble t-il.
si mon souvenir est bon sur IY j'ai volé sur un 737.800 et c'etait tres moderne, tres confort ( peu de bruit ect....)
sur LC : ma preference va vraiment sur le 777.300 !! aujourd'hui : c'est vraiment le meilleur avion !!!
a tous bon voyage😉😉
Je pense que pour les longs courriers les séries 777 sont intéressantes, du fait de la cabine spacieuse. Par contre je trouve ces avions bien plus bruyants que les séries A330/340 (surtout pour les dernières rangées).
Par contre j'ai hâte de voir les "nouvelles" cabines des séries A32X.
Par contre j'ai hâte de voir les "nouvelles" cabines des séries A32X.
mais justement j'ai beaucoup entendu dire que le 777 est meilleur que l'A340 parcequ'il consommé moins. Est-ce parce que le 777 est un biréacteur ? si c'est le cas pourquoi airbus ne transforme pas son A340 en biréacteur, ils en sont capables non ? à mons que un quatriréacteur approte d'autres avantages que je ne connais pas et qu'airbus souhaite gardé.
L'A340 en bi-réacteur existe déjà! c'est l' A330. L'A330 marche très bien, mais le 777 a une plus grande capacité de sièges et de fret, il en va de même pour l'autonomie. Mais l'A330 marche bien mieux que le 340!
airbus est en perte de vitesse sur les avions long courrier ..boeing vend son 777 et 787 dreamliner comme des p'tits pains ..pour l'airbus 2 ans retard pour l'A380, lancement raté et échec commercial de l'A350 ..l'A340 devenu invendable 🏴☠️ ..le grand airbus qu'on a connu qui domine boeing chaque année, ça c'est fini et pour un bon moment ..notre industrie aeronautique et europeene vie un moment noir ..
la vie c'est un voyage dési la terre nou lé ké passager ouh ouh créole en profite ton liberté
Pour comparer ...un coup d'oeil a la politique des pays des Cies concernées c'est le plus parlant de tout
Pourquoi le Japon qui a les B747 les + densifiés au monde (plus que Corsair😏) et a besoin de "méga-porteurs" n'est pas pour le A380 ?......la réponse en partie dans l'implication de l'industrie japonaise dans les programmes Boeing dont le B787....c'est tout, c'est de bonne guerre!
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
il me semble que l'A330 n'est pas le concurent du 777 mais du 767. D'ailleurs j'ai l'impression que le 330 se vend bien mieux que le 767 en ce moment ! au fait airbus ou boeing prévoit t-il de nouvelles versions d'un avion déjà existant? ( comme 330-400 ou autres...). Mais bon, la vente d'un avion semble souvent venir d'une grande influence politique...
Pour Boeing, le 747-800... la version fret semble remporter un certain succès face à l'A380F... mais la version I (I pour Intercontinental... la version passagers en fait) heu... comment dire... je crois qu'à part des VIP c'est le vide total, ils n'ont pas encore de client de lancement et espèrent en avoir un d'ici la fin de l'année, sans en être certains
Je crois que le 777-200LRF reste à mettre en service
Pour Airbus, une évolution de l'A320, version + économique... pas trop de détails pour le moment je crois... Sinon il y a aussi l'A380F à faire voler et peut-être l'A380-900 Ah oui et l'A330-200F aussi sans doute...
au fait airbus ou boeing prévoit t-il de nouvelles versions d'un avion déjà existant?
Pour Airbus, une évolution de l'A320, version + économique... pas trop de détails pour le moment je crois... Sinon il y a aussi l'A380F à faire voler et peut-être l'A380-900 Ah oui et l'A330-200F aussi sans doute...
au fait airbus ou boeing prévoit t-il de nouvelles versions d'un avion déjà existant?
Vincent
le jour que JAL commande un airbus les poules auront des dents ..les japs sont anti airbus ..A380 ou pas de tout manière il commanderons jamais un airbus
la vie c'est un voyage dési la terre nou lé ké passager ouh ouh créole en profite ton liberté
les japs sont anti airbus
Ils sont surtout pro boeing qu'anti airbus. Et Boeing leur donne la part de plus en plus belle. Un article du Taipei Times de 2003 indiquait que les entreprises japonaises allaient fabriquer 35% du 7E7, contre 21% du 777 et 15% du 767.
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Kawasaki Heavy Industries et Fuji Heavy Industries sont des fournisseurs de Boeing de tout premier plan.
Ils sont surtout pro boeing qu'anti airbus. Et Boeing leur donne la part de plus en plus belle. Un article du Taipei Times de 2003 indiquait que les entreprises japonaises allaient fabriquer 35% du 7E7, contre 21% du 777 et 15% du 767.
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Kawasaki Heavy Industries et Fuji Heavy Industries sont des fournisseurs de Boeing de tout premier plan.
"Sur le moyen-courrier, nous étions en dehors du marché avec un produit trop haut de gamme." PHG, La Tribune, 18/11/2010.
c'est la version cargo de l'A380 a du mal a ce vendre ..par rapport au 7478F un réchauffé de 40 ans ..
la vie c'est un voyage dési la terre nou lé ké passager ouh ouh créole en profite ton liberté
un 320 encore plus économique que maintenant alors que l'actuel 320 se vend bien, boeing risque de voir les ventes leur 737 diminuées si ils ne l'améliorent pas ! quel est le problème du 380 face au 747-800 en version fret ? ce serait quand même étrange si les japonnais acheté un 747-800 passagers plutôt qu'un 380 si un 380 correspond mieux aux nombre de passagers qu'ils transportent ! au fait entre un 747-400 et un 747-800 quelles sont les grosses différences ?
ANA et JAS oui il ont pris quelque airbus avant, sauf que JAS a fusioné avec JAL si je raconte pas connerie ..mais je vois pas JAL commandé 1 airbus malgré sa privatisation le gouvernement japs a encore une grosse influence sur JAL qui les oblige a commandé boeing ..
je comprends pas trop leur stratégie (JAL ou ANA ) ils veulent éliminé complement les très gros porteur type 747 pour des avions plus petit type 787 ou 777 ..ils adopte la stratégie du point to point ??? ..
je comprends pas trop leur stratégie (JAL ou ANA ) ils veulent éliminé complement les très gros porteur type 747 pour des avions plus petit type 787 ou 777 ..ils adopte la stratégie du point to point ??? ..
la vie c'est un voyage dési la terre nou lé ké passager ouh ouh créole en profite ton liberté
Boeing aussi va sortir un successeur au 737, théoriquement basé sur les acquis du 787... donc c'est probablement + lointain mais ça risque aussi d'être + efficace (enfin en théorie)
pour l'avantage du 748F, notamment la porte de nez... l'A380F n'en aura pas et pour les charges de grande taille ça s'avère assez utile... normalement le 748F aura des réacteurs + évolués (insipirés de ceux du 787) l'A380F est structurellement beaucoup plus lourd que le 748F donc même s'il peut emporter plus de charge, le rapport masse vide / masse transportable n'est pas en sa faveur (l'A380F pèse 252tonnes et peut emporter 141tonnes de charge, le 748F pèse 178tonnes et peut emporter 134tonnes) donc grosso modo il est trop lourd donc il y a une forme de gaspillage puisk + lourd = + cher. grosso modo ça rend l'A380 intéressant pour du transport de matières assez peu denses en très grande quantité (fret postal, fruits/légumes, petit electronique/electromenager) tandis que le 748F est plus adapté pour le transport de produits denses et lourds (machines-outils, voitures, hélico, engins de chantier, pièces d'avions, ...) après reste la distance franchissable... le problème dans le fret c'est que ça n'est pas capital... en général les compagnies préfèrent remplir l'avion et faire des escales carburant plutôt que de faire partir l'avion à moitié vide pour pouvoir passer un direct...
pour ce qui est des japonais... bof... comme ça a été dit, la politique joue beaucoup... El Al aura beau préférer les Airbus, ils achetteront des Boeings, on a forcé Air France à acheter des Airbus... et si ça n'est pas politique, c'est sans doute par conviction ou par soucis d'économies... c'est pas demain qu'on verra un Airbus chez Ryanair parce qu'un nouveau type d'avion c'est un nouveau stock de pièces, des formations équipages et mécano à payer, ...
un 320 encore plus économique que maintenant alors que l'actuel 320 se vend bien, boeing risque de voir les ventes leur 737 diminuées si ils ne l'améliorent pas ! quel est le problème du 380 face au 747-800 en version fret ? ce serait quand même étrange si les japonnais acheté un 747-800 passagers plutôt qu'un 380 si un 380 correspond mieux aux nombre de passagers qu'ils transportent ! au fait entre un 747-400 et un 747-800 quelles sont les grosses différences ?
pour l'avantage du 748F, notamment la porte de nez... l'A380F n'en aura pas et pour les charges de grande taille ça s'avère assez utile... normalement le 748F aura des réacteurs + évolués (insipirés de ceux du 787) l'A380F est structurellement beaucoup plus lourd que le 748F donc même s'il peut emporter plus de charge, le rapport masse vide / masse transportable n'est pas en sa faveur (l'A380F pèse 252tonnes et peut emporter 141tonnes de charge, le 748F pèse 178tonnes et peut emporter 134tonnes) donc grosso modo il est trop lourd donc il y a une forme de gaspillage puisk + lourd = + cher. grosso modo ça rend l'A380 intéressant pour du transport de matières assez peu denses en très grande quantité (fret postal, fruits/légumes, petit electronique/electromenager) tandis que le 748F est plus adapté pour le transport de produits denses et lourds (machines-outils, voitures, hélico, engins de chantier, pièces d'avions, ...) après reste la distance franchissable... le problème dans le fret c'est que ça n'est pas capital... en général les compagnies préfèrent remplir l'avion et faire des escales carburant plutôt que de faire partir l'avion à moitié vide pour pouvoir passer un direct...
pour ce qui est des japonais... bof... comme ça a été dit, la politique joue beaucoup... El Al aura beau préférer les Airbus, ils achetteront des Boeings, on a forcé Air France à acheter des Airbus... et si ça n'est pas politique, c'est sans doute par conviction ou par soucis d'économies... c'est pas demain qu'on verra un Airbus chez Ryanair parce qu'un nouveau type d'avion c'est un nouveau stock de pièces, des formations équipages et mécano à payer, ...
un 320 encore plus économique que maintenant alors que l'actuel 320 se vend bien, boeing risque de voir les ventes leur 737 diminuées si ils ne l'améliorent pas ! quel est le problème du 380 face au 747-800 en version fret ? ce serait quand même étrange si les japonnais acheté un 747-800 passagers plutôt qu'un 380 si un 380 correspond mieux aux nombre de passagers qu'ils transportent ! au fait entre un 747-400 et un 747-800 quelles sont les grosses différences ?
Vincent
... pour l'avantage du 748F, notamment la porte de nez... l'A380F n'en aura pas et pour les charges de grande taille ça s'avère assez utile...
Visiblement 2 types d'opérateurs différents Le B747 est pour les opérateurs cargo et le A380 semble plaire aux opérateurs de type intégrateurs. Ce n'est pas sans raison que la Cie de lancement du A380 en version fret est Fed Ex !
Visiblement 2 types d'opérateurs différents Le B747 est pour les opérateurs cargo et le A380 semble plaire aux opérateurs de type intégrateurs. Ce n'est pas sans raison que la Cie de lancement du A380 en version fret est Fed Ex !
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
airbus essairait de faire de la chine ce que boeing a fait du japon : un très sérieux partenaire !
avec la signature la semaine dernière en chine pour 150 A320, la chine a négocié que ces avions soient assemblés directement en chine.
airbus a accepté. certains craignent qu'airbus ne livre tout son savoir faire, d'autres estiment que les chaines d'assemblages ne sont qu'une petite partie du savoir-faire. Toujours est-il qu'airbus espère désormais qu'avec ces chaines, la chine achetent encore plus d'avions. aujourd'hui environ 65% des avions en chine sont des boeing et airbus veut que cela change. On estime entre 1500 et 2000 le nombre d'avions dont auront besoin les chinois, une vraie mine d'or que le groupe européen ne veut pas rater !
Petite explication pour le fret:A380 a vide: 275T747-8 a vide: 160T
Masse transportable:A380: 150T747-8: 120T (ce n'est pas exactement ces chiffres, mais c'est a peu pres vrai) En gros, pour 30 Tonnes sup transportables, l'avion est plus de 50% plus lourd! D'où un relatif succes du 747-8F, mais a savoir que cela ne fait pas tout, car au niveau volume, l'A380F a un avantage énorme, apres tout dépend des besoins des compagnies, et de ce qu'elles transportent.
Masse transportable:A380: 150T747-8: 120T (ce n'est pas exactement ces chiffres, mais c'est a peu pres vrai) En gros, pour 30 Tonnes sup transportables, l'avion est plus de 50% plus lourd! D'où un relatif succes du 747-8F, mais a savoir que cela ne fait pas tout, car au niveau volume, l'A380F a un avantage énorme, apres tout dépend des besoins des compagnies, et de ce qu'elles transportent.
La guerre salit tous ceux qui la font: au fil des mois et des années, j'ai vu les deux bords verser dans le mal, j'ai vu le mal affronté le mal, et le bien, ce qu'il y'a de bon dans l'humain, devenir la victime des deux.
Les grandes differences entre le 744 et le 748?La taille, environ 60 passagers de plusLa forme des ailes du 748 sont vraiment differentes.
Cela, pour l'exterieur, apres pour l'interieur, cockpit se rapprochant un peu plus du 787, et puis apres nouveau materiaux, etc..
La guerre salit tous ceux qui la font: au fil des mois et des années, j'ai vu les deux bords verser dans le mal, j'ai vu le mal affronté le mal, et le bien, ce qu'il y'a de bon dans l'humain, devenir la victime des deux.
Je vois que j'ai répondu juste avant, mais que toi, tu as les chiffres exactes! Je les avais plus en tete et j'avais un peu la flemme de cherché.
Si Airbus sort une version évolué du 320, c'est provisoire! Il sortirai en 2009 et s'arreterait avec un remplacant du 320 pas avant 2015! Boeing prévoit un peu la meme chose!
De plus, Airbus, va surement avoir des plus gros techniques que Boeing avec l'A350, en effet, Airbus va surement encore accroitre la part des materiaux composite dans l'A350! Donc, l'avantage de 6-7% que l'A350 allait avoir sur le papier pourrait passé a 10%.. Et le 787, dans sa forme actuelle, serait comme l'A340 ajd.. Le cout du programme passerait alors de 10 a 12Milliards d'€
La guerre salit tous ceux qui la font: au fil des mois et des années, j'ai vu les deux bords verser dans le mal, j'ai vu le mal affronté le mal, et le bien, ce qu'il y'a de bon dans l'humain, devenir la victime des deux.
je suis assez étonné de voir que l'A350 serait meilleur que le 787. beaucoup disent que l'A350 n'est qu'un simple 330 amélioré. Mais tant mieux s'il vaut mieux que cela ! d'ailleur quel avenir pour le 350, va-t-il voir le jour ou airbus ce permettrait de laisser boeing sans concurrent ? Vu le succès du 787 cela semblerait être une erreur ! d'ailleur combien y'a t-il eu de ventes respectivement pour le 787 et le 350 ? et si le 350 ne voit pas le jour, airbus va encore devoir, après les retards de l'A380, payer des indemnités aux compagnies qui ont acheté cet appareil ? s'il annule l'A350, la politique d'airbus deviendrais alors bien étrange...
l'A350 a déjà connu un certain nombre de modif... à l'origine ça devait effectivement être un A330 un peu amélioré (nouvelles ailes essentiellement).... puis il a été changé pour devenir un appareil entièrement nouveau (nouveau fuselage, nouvelles ailes, nouveau réacteur, utilisation de plus de matériaux légers) annoncé comme meilleur que le 787... peut-être évoluera-t-il encore (ça parle de fuselage à la sauce 787)... à voir.
quant à savoir s'il va voir le jour, Airbus le sait sans doute... officiellement, pour le moment, oui, il verra le jour... mais un certain temps après le 787... et reste à savoir s'il concurrencera le 777, le 787 ou les 2 ?!
niveau ventes, j'ai pas trop les chiffres... mais vu que l'A350 n'est pas encore industriellement lancé, je crois que techniquement aucune commande n'est ferme... ce sont juste des lettres d'intention ou trucs dans le genre. Le 787 en revanche connait un nombre de commandes fermes conséquent... enfin pour le moment le 787 surclasse largement l'A350... en même temps c'est logique, le projet est nettement plus avancé...
pour ce qui est de payer des indemnités aux compagnies clientes de l'A350 s'il n'est pas lancé, à priori non, justement car les commandes ne peuvent pas devenir fermes puisqu'industriellement il n'y a rien de définitif... le lancement commercial précède justement le lancement industriel afin de voir si assez de compagnies sont intéressées... si ça n'est pas le cas, projet abandonné, tout le monde rentre chez soi
que l'on me corrige si j'ai dit des bétises
quant à savoir s'il va voir le jour, Airbus le sait sans doute... officiellement, pour le moment, oui, il verra le jour... mais un certain temps après le 787... et reste à savoir s'il concurrencera le 777, le 787 ou les 2 ?!
niveau ventes, j'ai pas trop les chiffres... mais vu que l'A350 n'est pas encore industriellement lancé, je crois que techniquement aucune commande n'est ferme... ce sont juste des lettres d'intention ou trucs dans le genre. Le 787 en revanche connait un nombre de commandes fermes conséquent... enfin pour le moment le 787 surclasse largement l'A350... en même temps c'est logique, le projet est nettement plus avancé...
pour ce qui est de payer des indemnités aux compagnies clientes de l'A350 s'il n'est pas lancé, à priori non, justement car les commandes ne peuvent pas devenir fermes puisqu'industriellement il n'y a rien de définitif... le lancement commercial précède justement le lancement industriel afin de voir si assez de compagnies sont intéressées... si ça n'est pas le cas, projet abandonné, tout le monde rentre chez soi
que l'on me corrige si j'ai dit des bétises
Vincent
je crois qu'airbus/eads ont quelque soucis financié ..il vont subir des milliards perte cause du retard de l'A380
les choses ne sont pas facile pour eux pour lancé l'A350XWB ..de plus les amerloques savone la planche a l'omc contre les aide remboursable pour le 350 🏴☠️
la vie c'est un voyage dési la terre nou lé ké passager ouh ouh créole en profite ton liberté
mauvaise nouvelle pour l'A380F ..
Fedex annule une commande de 10 Airbus A380, la remplace par 15 Boeing B777
http://www.aerospacemedia.com/AFP/preview.asp?xml=061107162047.ee2r58cu.xml
Fedex annule une commande de 10 Airbus A380, la remplace par 15 Boeing B777
http://www.aerospacemedia.com/AFP/preview.asp?xml=061107162047.ee2r58cu.xml
la vie c'est un voyage dési la terre nou lé ké passager ouh ouh créole en profite ton liberté
j'ai des chiffres concernant l'A350. 69 ventes pour l'A350-800, avion capable de transporter 253 personnes sur 16300 km ! un sacré rayon d'action ! 31 ventes pour l'A350-900, capable de voyager avec 300 personnes à son bord sur 13900km. il faut maintenant espèré que ces ventes ne soient pas annulé étant donné le nombre d'années qu'il faut pour monter cet avion, si il voit un jour le jour.
Mauvaise nouvelle pour airbus avec l'annulation de Fedex et c'est boeing qui sourit. Les dirigeants d'airbus ont du pain sur la planche !
Mauvaise nouvelle pour airbus avec l'annulation de Fedex et c'est boeing qui sourit. Les dirigeants d'airbus ont du pain sur la planche !
Le rayon du 350-900 est de plus de 13900km, il doit etre maintenant de 15 900km si mes souvenirs sont bon..
De toute facon, il verra le jour, Airbus ne peut pas laisser le créneaux des longs courriers de moyennes capacités a Boeing, cela serait une tres tres grosse erreur et Airbus le sait, Gallois le sait..
La guerre salit tous ceux qui la font: au fil des mois et des années, j'ai vu les deux bords verser dans le mal, j'ai vu le mal affronté le mal, et le bien, ce qu'il y'a de bon dans l'humain, devenir la victime des deux.
airbus avait présenté un nouveau A350 salon de Farnborough au mois juillet surnomé A350XWB ..
Airbus A350-800 
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airbus_A350
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airbus_A350
la vie c'est un voyage dési la terre nou lé ké passager ouh ouh créole en profite ton liberté
Log in first, then come back to this page.
You might also like
Storm in the Canary Islands
New adventures from Perpignan to Ranchi (Jharkhand)
Breathtaking Kyrgyzstan!
Argentine and Chilean Patagonia from El Calafate to Ushuaia
Turkey 2026: Riviera, Antalya, and Cappadocia
Page by Page on the Assisi Way – 1,200 km on Foot
How to nail your trek in wet climates: which pants keep you truly dry?
Densha Otaku - Lesser-Known Regions
More discussions
Bonjour,
J'ai pris au mois de février un billet chez Air-France KLM de Lyon vers San Diego avec escale à Amsterdam (Vols opérés par KLM). Le vol est prévu fin août. Mon vol Lyon->Amsterdam a été annulé au mois de juin par KLM et un vol de remplacement, la veille au soir, m'a été réservé. Je vais donc me retrouver à passer la nuit à l'aéroport d'Amsterdam pour prendre le lendemain, en fin de matinée, mon vol pour San-Diego.
L'annulation ayant eu lieu plus de 14 jours avant le départ, je sais que je n'ai pas droit à un dédommagement financier ( règlement CE 261/2004). Mais ai-je droit au remboursement d'une nuit d’hôtel à Amsterdam ?
J'ai pris au mois de février un billet chez Air-France KLM de Lyon vers San Diego avec escale à Amsterdam (Vols opérés par KLM). Le vol est prévu fin août. Mon vol Lyon->Amsterdam a été annulé au mois de juin par KLM et un vol de remplacement, la veille au soir, m'a été réservé. Je vais donc me retrouver à passer la nuit à l'aéroport d'Amsterdam pour prendre le lendemain, en fin de matinée, mon vol pour San-Diego.
L'annulation ayant eu lieu plus de 14 jours avant le départ, je sais que je n'ai pas droit à un dédommagement financier ( règlement CE 261/2004). Mais ai-je droit au remboursement d'une nuit d’hôtel à Amsterdam ?
Hi there,
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon. I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport. Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…). AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly. On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double! In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others? Given the price difference, I’m hesitant… Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go? Thanks, HERVE
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon. I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport. Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…). AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly. On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double! In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others? Given the price difference, I’m hesitant… Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go? Thanks, HERVE
Hi everyone,
Next January, I’m heading to India.
My outbound flight is with Emirates from Paris to Dubai, then another Emirates flight from Dubai to Calcutta.
Could anyone tell me how the connection works? I’ve heard there’s a dedicated Emirates zone, but how does it actually work in practice—I’ve got a 2-hour layover.
Thanks so much!
Take care.
Hi everyone, I’ve unfortunately only just noticed that I booked two flight tickets, but I made a mistake on the second first name. Basically, my computer auto-filled and typed my first name twice, so both tickets are in my first name. Only the last names—mine and my friend’s—are correct.
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common). I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common). I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
Great news for those heading to Bahia / Salvador toward the end of the year.
Air France plans to increase flights from 3 to 5 during the December 2026 / February 2027 period.
Original source: Salvador terá mais voos diretos para Paris durante o verão; veja o que muda | Jornal Correio 1
Tropical greetings from Salvador,
@IvanBahiaGuide
(local specialist, active on the French-speaking Brazil Forums for over 16 years now)
Hello,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi there,
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
Hi,
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
Hi there,
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
Hi,
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
Hi,
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
Hello,
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
Hello,
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Hi everyone,
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
Hi there!
Has anyone taken the direct flight from CDG to Las Vegas with Air France?
Looking forward to your feedback!
Hey everyone,
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
Hi there,
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric
Hi there,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
Hi there,
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry
Hi there,
I have a question...
Has anyone managed to get a refund from Oman Air?
After a delayed flight, we missed our connecting flight to get home!! At midnight, the flight attendant booked us on a flight to Nice via Munich, even though we were in Munich and wanted to get back to Nice... Too tired from the trip, we didn’t notice the mistake!! The next day, of course, the booking wasn’t valid!! We had to pay again for the flight back to Nice... I’m really struggling!! I think they’re giving me the runaround!! I’ve sent several emails, tried Messenger and WhatsApp, but the only responses I get are: "We need to investigate!! We’ll get back to you in 15 days!!" It’s been over a month!!
I just sent a registered letter (LRAR) to their office at Paris Charles de Gaulle, which is still open!!
Do you have any other suggestions for me?
Thanks in advance for your help! Virginie
After a delayed flight, we missed our connecting flight to get home!! At midnight, the flight attendant booked us on a flight to Nice via Munich, even though we were in Munich and wanted to get back to Nice... Too tired from the trip, we didn’t notice the mistake!! The next day, of course, the booking wasn’t valid!! We had to pay again for the flight back to Nice... I’m really struggling!! I think they’re giving me the runaround!! I’ve sent several emails, tried Messenger and WhatsApp, but the only responses I get are: "We need to investigate!! We’ll get back to you in 15 days!!" It’s been over a month!!
I just sent a registered letter (LRAR) to their office at Paris Charles de Gaulle, which is still open!!
Do you have any other suggestions for me?
Thanks in advance for your help! Virginie
Hi!
Sri Lanka has announced it could run out of fuel in the coming weeks if the Strait of Hormuz remains blocked. The government has implemented a mandatory four-day workweek to save oil, and there are long lines at gas stations due to fears of an early shortage.
In Vietnam, the government has warned all airlines that flights will need to be reduced due to a lack of kerosene. The country imports two-thirds of its jet fuel from China and Thailand, but both countries have now banned exports out of fear of domestic shortages.
The state is asking airlines to plan ahead and park aircraft to drastically reduce operations, starting with domestic flights and then international ones. International carriers will also need to cut back on their rotations.
This will begin in the coming days. 🙁
Hi there,
I’ve got a long layover (about 10 hours) in Seoul on an upcoming trip.
I arrive from Phnom Penh at 7:20 AM and depart for Montreal at 6:00 PM.
First question: Will my checked baggage be transferred automatically? I have a single ticket from KTI to YUL (Air Canada ticket—KTI-ICN operated by Asiana (codeshare) and ICN-YUL by Air Canada).
Second question: I saw it’s possible to join free guided tours (Airport Transit Tour). What do you think of this kind of service? And is my "actual" layover time (accounting for security checks, check-in, etc.) enough to do one of these tours?
Thanks in advance to everyone who chimes in on this!
First question: Will my checked baggage be transferred automatically? I have a single ticket from KTI to YUL (Air Canada ticket—KTI-ICN operated by Asiana (codeshare) and ICN-YUL by Air Canada).
Second question: I saw it’s possible to join free guided tours (Airport Transit Tour). What do you think of this kind of service? And is my "actual" layover time (accounting for security checks, check-in, etc.) enough to do one of these tours?
Thanks in advance to everyone who chimes in on this!
