Une nouvelle qui va vous intéresser : Air Asia X pourrait bientôt ouvrir une ligne Kuala Lumpur <=> Paris-Orly A lire ici
Air Asia X: bientôt une ligne Kuala Lumpur - Paris-Orly
by Pistike
This discussion is in French, the community’s main language.
Original post
Bonjour,
Une nouvelle qui va vous intéresser : Air Asia X pourrait bientôt ouvrir une ligne Kuala Lumpur <=> Paris-Orly A lire ici
Une nouvelle qui va vous intéresser : Air Asia X pourrait bientôt ouvrir une ligne Kuala Lumpur <=> Paris-Orly A lire ici
Bonsoir Slasherfun,
Tu penses plutôt à un prolongement de la ligne Kuala Lumpur <=> Abu Dhabi qu'ils vont inaugurer mi-novembre ?
Tu penses plutôt à un prolongement de la ligne Kuala Lumpur <=> Abu Dhabi qu'ils vont inaugurer mi-novembre ?
Oui, ils comptent faire une sorte de "hub virtuel" à Abu Dhabi. Reste à voir ce qu'ils choisiront donc.
Contributions CC BY-SA
Bonjour,
Une nouvelle qui va vous intéresser : Air Asia X pourrait bientôt ouvrir une ligne Kuala Lumpur <=> Paris-Orly A lire ici
... pourrait peut être ouvrir ... il ya deja eu un paquet d'annonces/reumeurs sur lAirAsiaX qui est en pleine recherche de son modéle long courrier, hors zone Asie Océanie ! ... hub a Abu Dhabi ou trafic Europe Australie, ou vols directs "point a point" de KUL vers Europe ou KUL / New York ou ??? ça fuse de partout a mediter aussi ce qui a été evoqué sur un autre sujet ici même
"Aucun droits de trafic sont a ce jour accordés a AirAsiaX sauf ça "French President Nicolas Sarkozy has approved plans for AirAsia to land at Orly Airport in southern Paris"
A suivre et pas trop rever pour le moment ce type de trafic ne s'installe pas en un claquement de doigts mais si ça se fait un jour ... good news
Une nouvelle qui va vous intéresser : Air Asia X pourrait bientôt ouvrir une ligne Kuala Lumpur <=> Paris-Orly A lire ici
... pourrait peut être ouvrir ... il ya deja eu un paquet d'annonces/reumeurs sur lAirAsiaX qui est en pleine recherche de son modéle long courrier, hors zone Asie Océanie ! ... hub a Abu Dhabi ou trafic Europe Australie, ou vols directs "point a point" de KUL vers Europe ou KUL / New York ou ??? ça fuse de partout a mediter aussi ce qui a été evoqué sur un autre sujet ici même
"Aucun droits de trafic sont a ce jour accordés a AirAsiaX sauf ça "French President Nicolas Sarkozy has approved plans for AirAsia to land at Orly Airport in southern Paris"
A suivre et pas trop rever pour le moment ce type de trafic ne s'installe pas en un claquement de doigts mais si ça se fait un jour ... good news
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Ah oui, Nice serait aussi sur les rangs.
était !! comme Prague, Madrid, Manchester ... ... sur les media "spécialisés" asiatiques ont est beaucoup plus reservés sur la faisabilité je cite "AirAsia is now awaiting more details from the authorities. " car ce trafic rentre dans le cadre des accords bilateraux France / Malaysie et va donc bien au dela de simples slots a Orly ! Pour le moment AirAsiaX cherche des $$$ donc faire parler d'elle un peu partout est "bon"
était !! comme Prague, Madrid, Manchester ... ... sur les media "spécialisés" asiatiques ont est beaucoup plus reservés sur la faisabilité je cite "AirAsia is now awaiting more details from the authorities. " car ce trafic rentre dans le cadre des accords bilateraux France / Malaysie et va donc bien au dela de simples slots a Orly ! Pour le moment AirAsiaX cherche des $$$ donc faire parler d'elle un peu partout est "bon"
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Il faut esperer que l'arrivée d'Air Asia X à Orly ne pénalise pas une des missions premières de cet aéroport, les lignes de service public.
En effet, la "service public à la française" serait moins bien assuré si des lignes vitales pour l'économie et la cohésion sociale comme Paris - Cean devaient être fermées afin de permettre à une compagnie low cost de venir faire de l'argent ! L'aéroport étant saturé et les slots rares, c'est ce qui risque d'arriver pourtant... 😉
En effet, la "service public à la française" serait moins bien assuré si des lignes vitales pour l'économie et la cohésion sociale comme Paris - Cean devaient être fermées afin de permettre à une compagnie low cost de venir faire de l'argent ! L'aéroport étant saturé et les slots rares, c'est ce qui risque d'arriver pourtant... 😉
Il faut esperer que l'arrivée d'Air Asia X à Orly ne pénalise pas une des missions premières de cet aéroport, les lignes de service public.
J'ai toujours regretté la transformation forcée d'Orly en une sorte de "La Guardia", des compagnies comme AA qui se trouvaient très bien à Orly ont été forcées de déménager dans ce grand bordel qu'est CDG 😕
J'ai toujours regretté la transformation forcée d'Orly en une sorte de "La Guardia", des compagnies comme AA qui se trouvaient très bien à Orly ont été forcées de déménager dans ce grand bordel qu'est CDG 😕
Contributions CC BY-SA
On peut le dire comme ça...
Limiter par divers moyens l'arrivée de nouveaux venus en les forçant à partir à CDG si ils veulent se développer...
A quand la transformation de la ligne Paris - Strasbourg en La Navette avec un vol toutes les 15 minutes en Beech 1900 ???
Je ne suis pas contre une transformation de Orly en La Guardia : cet aéroport est facile d'accès depuis Paris, les aérogares sont pratiques (même si le sud est parfois saturé), c'est un deuxième point de départ pratique pour la clientèle résident au sud de la capitale. Pour des vols domestiques et européens je trouve qu'il a sa pertinance et dommage que la concurrence y soit limitée.
Limiter par divers moyens l'arrivée de nouveaux venus en les forçant à partir à CDG si ils veulent se développer...
A quand la transformation de la ligne Paris - Strasbourg en La Navette avec un vol toutes les 15 minutes en Beech 1900 ???
Je ne suis pas contre une transformation de Orly en La Guardia : cet aéroport est facile d'accès depuis Paris, les aérogares sont pratiques (même si le sud est parfois saturé), c'est un deuxième point de départ pratique pour la clientèle résident au sud de la capitale. Pour des vols domestiques et européens je trouve qu'il a sa pertinance et dommage que la concurrence y soit limitée.
Il faut esperer que l'arrivée d'Air Asia X à Orly ne pénalise pas une des missions premières de cet aéroport, les lignes de service public. ...
Je pense que ça finira a CDG T3 ... le COHOR va justifier son intervention comme ça ... et de plus AirAsiaX semble miser sur les pax en connecting*, pas sur que ORY soit le meilleur choix !
Le vol KUL / Londres aurait un % de connecting tres important (30 % a Londres et 80% a KUL !) donc AirasiaX ne doit pas se tromper dans son choix de 2eme destination en Europe.
PS sur les medias asiatiques ont est un peu plus reservé que sur les medias français sur cette ouverture mais bon wait and see
Je pense que ça finira a CDG T3 ... le COHOR va justifier son intervention comme ça ... et de plus AirAsiaX semble miser sur les pax en connecting*, pas sur que ORY soit le meilleur choix !
Le vol KUL / Londres aurait un % de connecting tres important (30 % a Londres et 80% a KUL !) donc AirasiaX ne doit pas se tromper dans son choix de 2eme destination en Europe.
PS sur les medias asiatiques ont est un peu plus reservé que sur les medias français sur cette ouverture mais bon wait and see
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
En effet, la "service public à la française" serait moins bien assuré si des lignes vitales pour l'économie et la cohésion sociale comme Paris - Cean devaient être fermées afin de permettre à une compagnie low cost de venir faire de l'argent ! L'aéroport étant saturé et les slots rares, c'est ce qui risque d'arriver pourtant... 😉
Paris-Cean ?? 😊
Je comprends pas TB le lien entre service public et Orly, et le lien entre le fait que AirAsiaX envisage peut-être de se poser à Orly et la notion de service public...
Paris-Cean ?? 😊
Je comprends pas TB le lien entre service public et Orly, et le lien entre le fait que AirAsiaX envisage peut-être de se poser à Orly et la notion de service public...
Il n'y a pas de problème sans solution... et si il n'y a pas de solution, il n'y a pas de problème !
Bon, bah touchons le point Spinetta alors 😇
Air France est régulièrement accusé de conserver des liaisons à perte sur l'aéroport d'Orly (y a-t-il vraiment une demande pour une trentaine d'Orly - Toulouse quotidiens ?...) afin de conserver les slots qu'elle y a acquis (un slot est perdu si inutilisé, et a de la valeur), et au passage d'empêcher d'autres compagnies d'augmenter leur desserte d'Orly.
Air France est régulièrement accusé de conserver des liaisons à perte sur l'aéroport d'Orly (y a-t-il vraiment une demande pour une trentaine d'Orly - Toulouse quotidiens ?...) afin de conserver les slots qu'elle y a acquis (un slot est perdu si inutilisé, et a de la valeur), et au passage d'empêcher d'autres compagnies d'augmenter leur desserte d'Orly.
Contributions CC BY-SA
Je suis tout à fait d'accord avec toi envallis 🏴☠️
Je m'explique : l'aéroport de Paris Orly est saturé et les décollages/atterrissages sont soumis à l'attribution de créneaux horaires.
L'organisme qui les gère est la COHOR, une association qui regroupe les membres suivants : Aigle Azur, Air Caraibes, Air France, Airlinair, Brit Air, CCM, Corsairfly, Europe Airpost, L'Avion, Regional, Transavia, XL Airways, Air Mediterrannée; Aéroport de Paris, Aéroport de Lyon, Aéroport de Nice.
De plus, de très nombreuses lignes dont celles de "service public" sont opérés depuis cet aéroport et opérés en ATR42 voir Beech 1900, comme Cherbourg, Rennes, Berne, Londres City.
De l'autre côté, la compagnie Easyjet n'a pas été autorisée à exploiter plus d'avion et a du ouvrir une base à CDG afin de continuer son expension. Ainsi, elle n'a pu ouvrir une ligne vers Biarritz depuis Orly mais a du le faire depuis CDG...
Enfin, certaines lignes sont exploitées à des fréquences soutenues, toutes les 15 à 30 minutes (Toulouse, Nice), par des appareils de capacité moyenne afin d'éviter de libérer des slots qui permettrait l'arrivée de challangers. Ainsi, sur 13 compagnies aériennes participant à la Cohor, 6 font partie du même groupe (ou ont des interêts communs...)!
L'organisme qui les gère est la COHOR, une association qui regroupe les membres suivants : Aigle Azur, Air Caraibes, Air France, Airlinair, Brit Air, CCM, Corsairfly, Europe Airpost, L'Avion, Regional, Transavia, XL Airways, Air Mediterrannée; Aéroport de Paris, Aéroport de Lyon, Aéroport de Nice.
De plus, de très nombreuses lignes dont celles de "service public" sont opérés depuis cet aéroport et opérés en ATR42 voir Beech 1900, comme Cherbourg, Rennes, Berne, Londres City.
De l'autre côté, la compagnie Easyjet n'a pas été autorisée à exploiter plus d'avion et a du ouvrir une base à CDG afin de continuer son expension. Ainsi, elle n'a pu ouvrir une ligne vers Biarritz depuis Orly mais a du le faire depuis CDG...
Enfin, certaines lignes sont exploitées à des fréquences soutenues, toutes les 15 à 30 minutes (Toulouse, Nice), par des appareils de capacité moyenne afin d'éviter de libérer des slots qui permettrait l'arrivée de challangers. Ainsi, sur 13 compagnies aériennes participant à la Cohor, 6 font partie du même groupe (ou ont des interêts communs...)!
Je m'explique : l'aéroport de Paris Orly est saturé et les décollages/atterrissages sont soumis à l'attribution de créneaux horaires.
Par opposition, les aéroports aux USA ne sont pas soumis à ce type de régulation. Ça permet certes une très grande flexibilité aux compagnies aériennes (il leur suffit juste d'avoir des portes d'embarquement aux aéroports, et c'est pas ce qui manque), mais ça conduit forcément à des situations où les aéroports sont en surcapacité. Ainsi, il n'est pas rare d'avoir à attendre une heure pour décoller aux heures de pointe dans les grands aéroports (New York JFK, Newark, Chicago, Atlanta, San Francisco, Los Angeles...), ou d'avoir des situations ostensiblement impossibles (exemple sur le petit aéroport d'Orange County et son unique piste utilisable par les avions commerciaux : 16 vols sont prévus au décollage à 6h45...)
Par opposition, les aéroports aux USA ne sont pas soumis à ce type de régulation. Ça permet certes une très grande flexibilité aux compagnies aériennes (il leur suffit juste d'avoir des portes d'embarquement aux aéroports, et c'est pas ce qui manque), mais ça conduit forcément à des situations où les aéroports sont en surcapacité. Ainsi, il n'est pas rare d'avoir à attendre une heure pour décoller aux heures de pointe dans les grands aéroports (New York JFK, Newark, Chicago, Atlanta, San Francisco, Los Angeles...), ou d'avoir des situations ostensiblement impossibles (exemple sur le petit aéroport d'Orange County et son unique piste utilisable par les avions commerciaux : 16 vols sont prévus au décollage à 6h45...)
Contributions CC BY-SA
comprends toujours pas où tu veux en venir...
critiques-tu le fait que si AirAsiaX arrive alors une ligne intérieure opérée par AF va être fermée ? ou critiques-tu le système des slots et la mainmise sous-jacente de AF sur Orly ?
critiques-tu le fait que si AirAsiaX arrive alors une ligne intérieure opérée par AF va être fermée ? ou critiques-tu le système des slots et la mainmise sous-jacente de AF sur Orly ?
Il n'y a pas de problème sans solution... et si il n'y a pas de solution, il n'y a pas de problème !
pourquoi ils viennent pas à Paris-Beauvais ...ok je sors ! 😛
WWW.GRANCANARIA.COM imaginez une ile !
"y a-t-il vraiment une demande pour une trentaine d'Orly - Toulouse quotidiens "
La ligne Orly-Toulouse est l'une des rares lignes intérieures à être encore rentable. D'ailleurs AIR FRANCE a augmenté ses fréquences il y a quelques mois (des A321 ont aussi fait leur apparition sur la ligne)... tout comme EasyJet qui est passé à 5 fréquences quotidiennes. Habitant près d'Orly mais originaire de Toulouse je prends régulièrement cette ligne. Je l'ai pris à toutes les heures et n'importe quel jour, le taux de remplissage est toujours satisfaisant (Au grand maximum une 40 aine de places de libre, sur 160, mais en général une dizaine). Je l'ai pris ce vendredi à 6h45, un peu plus de 10 places de libre, retour le dimanche dans l'après midi, vol complet. Par contre les lignes Orly-Bordeaux et Orly-marseille sont beaucoup plus menacées ... TGV oblige (et comme Toulouse est très désavantagée de ce côté là ...)
Et pourquoi pas transférer les lignes de service public à CDG ... qui n'est pas réglementairement saturé ... et où un terminal pour les vols intérieurs vient d'être construit ? D'autre part le hub d'AF est à CDG.
Pour orly j'insiste bien sur le mot réglementairement saturé car à certaines heures à Orly ce n'est pas très actif (j'habite à proximité immédiate de l'aéroport). Par ailleurs un vol international, et encore plus intercontinental, créé plus d'emploi qu'un vol intérieur. Enfin Orly est le seul aéroport en Europe à avoir perdu des passagers entre 1999 et aujourd'hui. Donc si des compagnies viennent remplir des avions, qui plus est des A330, alors banco
Je suis bien d'accord avec Leloops ! Habitant moi-aussi près d'Orly je constate qu'il y a très peu de mouvements aériens entre 10h et 17h . L'engorgement prétendu de cet aéroport me fait bien rigoler . Depuis le départ d'Air France Cargo, Egyptair, Turkish, etc...quelques B737 ou A320 se baladent de temps en temps ....sans exagérer je vois un avion décoller toutes les 10 minutes environ . Nos brillants forumeurs qui affirment de manière péremptoire que les navettes décollent tous les 1/4 h pour Toulouse toute la journée devraient se rendre d'urgence chez l'ophtalmo ! Vivement l'arrivée prochaine de low-cost long-courriers car dans la journée Orly est désert,
Nos brillants forumeurs qui affirment de manière péremptoire que les navettes décollent tous les 1/4 h pour Toulouse toute la journée devraient se rendre d'urgence chez l'ophtalmo !
Les 30 vols par jour AF ORY-TLS ? Bah c'est dans la table horaire toujours.
Les 30 vols par jour AF ORY-TLS ? Bah c'est dans la table horaire toujours.
Contributions CC BY-SA
Quelle agressivité ! il ne faut pas se sentir toujours visé ! je maintiens après vérification 1 vol par heure entre Orly et Toulouse ou Marseille entre 10h et 17h et je ne vois pas le rapport avec Air Asia X qui peut facilement desservir Orly dans la journée
Quelle agressivité !
Où ça ? 🤪
il ne faut pas se sentir toujours visé !
Vu la description, ça semblait correspondre pourtant 😛
je maintiens après vérification 1 vol par heure entre Orly et Toulouse ou Marseille entre 10h et 17h et je ne vois pas le rapport avec Air Asia X qui peut facilement desservir Orly dans la journée
C'est aussi une question de slots disponibles. Ce n'est ainsi pas parce que "peu" d'avions partent et arrivent qu'il y a forcément la capacité de les prendre en charge au sol par exemple. 🙂
Où ça ? 🤪
il ne faut pas se sentir toujours visé !
Vu la description, ça semblait correspondre pourtant 😛
je maintiens après vérification 1 vol par heure entre Orly et Toulouse ou Marseille entre 10h et 17h et je ne vois pas le rapport avec Air Asia X qui peut facilement desservir Orly dans la journée
C'est aussi une question de slots disponibles. Ce n'est ainsi pas parce que "peu" d'avions partent et arrivent qu'il y a forcément la capacité de les prendre en charge au sol par exemple. 🙂
Contributions CC BY-SA
C'est aussi une question de slots disponibles. Ce n'est ainsi pas parce que "peu" d'avions partent et arrivent qu'il y a forcément la capacité de les prendre en charge au sol par exemple. 🙂
oui enfin, Orly est assez grand pour aller garer au loin les avions qui bougent pas de la journée, non ?
et les bus ca existe..
tssssst 😉
oui enfin, Orly est assez grand pour aller garer au loin les avions qui bougent pas de la journée, non ?
et les bus ca existe..
tssssst 😉
Il n'y a pas de problème sans solution... et si il n'y a pas de solution, il n'y a pas de problème !
Corsair et OpenSkies utilisent déjà pas mal de places au large.
Contributions CC BY-SA
Comme point final a cette "affaire" au moins pour le court / moyen terme, AirAsiaX n'a obtenu aucun slot a Orly (droits de trafic sur ORY) et en fait n'en avait pas demandé !!!!! (decision COHOR du 2/11)
No comments !
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
On avait le droit de rêver😇.
Par contre je ne m'attendais pas à voire WIZZAIR débarquer à Orly !!!! Elle qui se développe pas mal à Beauvais. Tu me répondras que RYANAIR vient de lancer Beauvais-Bratislava et que ça a du contrarier les plans de WIZZAIR.
2 vols quotidiens à destination de Venise pour EZS. Ils comptent les rajouter aux 2 vols quotidien effectués au départ de CDG ou simplement les transférer ?
1 vol quotidien pour PEGASUS AIRLINES. Connaît pas mais il semble que ce soit pour un vol à destination d'Istanbul. C'est bien ça va remplacer en partie l'activité qu'avait TURKISH.
1 vol quotidien pour VUELING. Alors là je ne comprends pas ils viennent de transférer leurs 2 vols quotidiens à destination de Séville à CDG et ils n'ont pas restitué les créneaux correspondants !!!!
3 vols quotidiens pour AIR PORTUGAL !!! Qu'est ce qu'ils vont bien pouvoir en faire ? Eux qui avaient plutôt tendance à réduire les fréquence sur Lisbonne et Porto ...
1 vol quotidien pour IBERIA. Comme pour AIR PORTUGAL je suis curieux de savoir comment elle va l'utiliser surtout qu'elle se limite à Madrid.
3 vols hebdo pour MIDEX. Moi qui pensait que le fret ne fonctionnait pas bien en ce moment ...
1 vol hebdo pour AIR ALGERIE.
Résultat, après avoir évoqué la possible arrivée d'AIR ASIA c'est sûr c'est un peu décevant.
Résultat, après avoir évoqué la possible arrivée d'AIR ASIA c'est sûr c'est un peu décevant.
Bonsoir,
Pour la liaison Paris-Orly/Kuala lumpur Air Asia x n'a pour le moment rien de prévu mais a pris date histoire de.......
Je viens de lire la page de wikipédia en anglais (car la version française élude 95% des données)sur Air asia X et j'ai vu avec intérêt je cite que:
"Air Asia X is planning to setup a "virtual hub" in the Middle East, potentially in Abu Dhabi. This new hub will focus on cities in Europe, Africa and the Middle East. This comes as AirAsia X fears that the new Low-Cost Carrier Terminal might not be ready by 2011 as there is no sign of any construction work or even groundbreaking of the new LCCT. This comes just days after the Malaysian government denied AirAsia X the rights to fly into Sydney and Seoul.There is also discussion of destinations in Spain, Turkey, Morocco, and Czech Republic from the planned Abu Dhabi hub. The airline's CEO announced that Abu Dhabi will become AirAsia X's Middle East hub. Potential destinations from Abu Dhabi include Frankfurt, Cairo and Nairobi. There are also plans to fly to Xi'an, Wuhan and Shenyang in China. They have also applied to fly to New York. Air Asia X has secured the rights to fly to Paris Orly Airport, France.This will be their second destination in Europe. The airline is also considering making Jeddah a second Middle Eastern hub".
Question1 Air asia X cherche t-elle à devenir un transporteur de poids style Air france ou autres?
Question 2 Air asia X est elle la branche long courrier de la compagnie Air asia?
Je viens de lire la page de wikipédia en anglais (car la version française élude 95% des données)sur Air asia X et j'ai vu avec intérêt je cite que:
"Air Asia X is planning to setup a "virtual hub" in the Middle East, potentially in Abu Dhabi. This new hub will focus on cities in Europe, Africa and the Middle East. This comes as AirAsia X fears that the new Low-Cost Carrier Terminal might not be ready by 2011 as there is no sign of any construction work or even groundbreaking of the new LCCT. This comes just days after the Malaysian government denied AirAsia X the rights to fly into Sydney and Seoul.There is also discussion of destinations in Spain, Turkey, Morocco, and Czech Republic from the planned Abu Dhabi hub. The airline's CEO announced that Abu Dhabi will become AirAsia X's Middle East hub. Potential destinations from Abu Dhabi include Frankfurt, Cairo and Nairobi. There are also plans to fly to Xi'an, Wuhan and Shenyang in China. They have also applied to fly to New York. Air Asia X has secured the rights to fly to Paris Orly Airport, France.This will be their second destination in Europe. The airline is also considering making Jeddah a second Middle Eastern hub".
Question1 Air asia X cherche t-elle à devenir un transporteur de poids style Air france ou autres?
Question 2 Air asia X est elle la branche long courrier de la compagnie Air asia?
Question1
Air asia X cherche t-elle à devenir un transporteur de poids style Air france ou autres?
Peut-être pas à ce point pour l'instant.
Question 2 Air asia X est elle la branche long courrier de la compagnie Air asia?
Non, c'est une compagnie qui exploite la marque AirAsia. Un peu comme les différentes Virgin qui n'ont financièrement pas grand chose à voir entre elles.
Air Asia X has secured the rights to fly to Paris Orly Airport, France.This will be their second destination in Europe.
Hop, apu, merci d'avoir prévenu 🙂
Peut-être pas à ce point pour l'instant.
Question 2 Air asia X est elle la branche long courrier de la compagnie Air asia?
Non, c'est une compagnie qui exploite la marque AirAsia. Un peu comme les différentes Virgin qui n'ont financièrement pas grand chose à voir entre elles.
Air Asia X has secured the rights to fly to Paris Orly Airport, France.This will be their second destination in Europe.
Hop, apu, merci d'avoir prévenu 🙂
Contributions CC BY-SA
Salut
Je ne sais plus ou je l'ai lu mais il me semble que air asia ne devraient pas ouvrir sa liaison vers paris avant 2011. Se pose la question des avions , a t'elle sufisement d'avion pour realiser la liaison KUL>CDG . Elle va recevoir un autre a330 dans quelque mois en phase de test pour l'instant sur Toulouse . Et semble plus vouloir s'implanter sur le marche australien vol quotidien sur toutes les lignes voir bi en fevr et juillet sur MEL . Par contre elle a suspendu ses vols sur Tianjin pour relier Pekin pour cause de mauvais temps selon elle ... Meme si les slots sont plus chere sur Pékin , il me semblent que la liaison y serait plus rentable . Reste Abu Dhabi et pourquoi pas Sharjha a la rigeur la ou se trouve le Hub de Air Arabia , je suis pas sur que Abu Dhabi tiennent longtemps ... Reste la question du connecting avec suivi de bagages , je crois que Air Asia l'envisage quand le futur Terminal de a Kuala sera fini possible source de développements , la il arrive a saturation du coup elle a du reporte des commandes d'a320 . De plus si les vols sur l'Australie son vraiment intéressant est tres bien pour le prix j'ai teste sur londres ils sont des fois a 890 livres ou se trouve le concept du low cost ... Voila un resume des evenements . a+
Je ne sais plus ou je l'ai lu mais il me semble que air asia ne devraient pas ouvrir sa liaison vers paris avant 2011. Se pose la question des avions , a t'elle sufisement d'avion pour realiser la liaison KUL>CDG . Elle va recevoir un autre a330 dans quelque mois en phase de test pour l'instant sur Toulouse . Et semble plus vouloir s'implanter sur le marche australien vol quotidien sur toutes les lignes voir bi en fevr et juillet sur MEL . Par contre elle a suspendu ses vols sur Tianjin pour relier Pekin pour cause de mauvais temps selon elle ... Meme si les slots sont plus chere sur Pékin , il me semblent que la liaison y serait plus rentable . Reste Abu Dhabi et pourquoi pas Sharjha a la rigeur la ou se trouve le Hub de Air Arabia , je suis pas sur que Abu Dhabi tiennent longtemps ... Reste la question du connecting avec suivi de bagages , je crois que Air Asia l'envisage quand le futur Terminal de a Kuala sera fini possible source de développements , la il arrive a saturation du coup elle a du reporte des commandes d'a320 . De plus si les vols sur l'Australie son vraiment intéressant est tres bien pour le prix j'ai teste sur londres ils sont des fois a 890 livres ou se trouve le concept du low cost ... Voila un resume des evenements . a+
Je ne sais plus ou je l'ai lu mais il me semble que air asia ne devraient pas ouvrir sa liaison vers paris avant 2011
Effectivement AIR ASIA n'est pas prête d'ouvrir la liaison Orly-Kuala Lumpur.Des créneaux libérés à Orly ont été réattribués le 1er juin dernier et AIR ASIA n'a même pas candidaté. Si une ligne vers Kuala Lumpur aurait été sympas sur Orly, l'obtention de nouveaux créneaux pour OPENSKIES (pour des vols à destination de Montréal?) est déjà une bonne nouvelle.
Effectivement AIR ASIA n'est pas prête d'ouvrir la liaison Orly-Kuala Lumpur.Des créneaux libérés à Orly ont été réattribués le 1er juin dernier et AIR ASIA n'a même pas candidaté. Si une ligne vers Kuala Lumpur aurait été sympas sur Orly, l'obtention de nouveaux créneaux pour OPENSKIES (pour des vols à destination de Montréal?) est déjà une bonne nouvelle.
S'ils veulent desservir la France à moindre coût sans avoir de problème de créneaux horaires ou d'horaires tardifs ils peuvent choisir Paris Vatry😄
Évitez les 777 d'Air France et de certaines autres compagnies configurés en 3/4/3. http://voyageforum.com/v.f?post=3735660
Il y a certains billets payés par le patron. Pour tout le reste, il y a RYANAIR.
S'ils veulent desservir la France à moindre coût sans avoir de problème de créneaux horaires ou d'horaires tardifs ils peuvent choisir Paris Vatry😄
Pas plus pour Vatry ... le trafic France/ Malaisie est soumis, concernant les droits de trafic, aux accords bilatereaux entre pays ! ... pour le moment AirAsiaX concentre ses efforts de développement sur la zone Asie / Océanie avec entre autre Seoul, Tokyo et Sydney a l'echeance fin 2010/2011 si ... elle arrive a obtenir les droits ! .... l'Europe suivra mais ça ne semble vraiement pas la priorité d'AirAsiaX surtout depuis l'echec ... provisoire ? du pseudo hub d'AbuDhabi, censé est un point entre Europe et Asie /Océanie et la encore tous les trafics sont soumis a droits préalable donc ça peut durer ... un certain temps ! par contre AirAsiaX devrait augmenter les frequences sur Londres !
Pas plus pour Vatry ... le trafic France/ Malaisie est soumis, concernant les droits de trafic, aux accords bilatereaux entre pays ! ... pour le moment AirAsiaX concentre ses efforts de développement sur la zone Asie / Océanie avec entre autre Seoul, Tokyo et Sydney a l'echeance fin 2010/2011 si ... elle arrive a obtenir les droits ! .... l'Europe suivra mais ça ne semble vraiement pas la priorité d'AirAsiaX surtout depuis l'echec ... provisoire ? du pseudo hub d'AbuDhabi, censé est un point entre Europe et Asie /Océanie et la encore tous les trafics sont soumis a droits préalable donc ça peut durer ... un certain temps ! par contre AirAsiaX devrait augmenter les frequences sur Londres !
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Hello les forumeurs ! la Cohor ( association pour la coordination des horaires ) a redistribué 1248 slots pour Orly. Air Asia obtient 208 slots annuels ( soit 2 vols hebdomadaires ) dont 84 utilisables dès la saison aéronautique d'hiver. Nous allons enfin profiter de tarifs concurrentiels entre Malaysian airlines et Air Asia X pour aller à Kuala Lumpur ! enfin on peut toujours rêver ......
depuis hier
ici
http://voyageforum.com/...slots_orly_D3665571/
En fait AirasiaX a augmenté Londres comme prévu mais a ensuite supprimé le vol du lundi a/c du 14 février donc un vol le lundi est visiblement le plus plausible
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Log in first, then come back to this page.
You might also like
More discussions
Great news for those heading to Bahia / Salvador toward the end of the year.
Air France plans to increase flights from 3 to 5 during the December 2026 / February 2027 period.
Original source: Salvador terá mais voos diretos para Paris durante o verão; veja o que muda | Jornal Correio 1
Tropical greetings from Salvador,
@IvanBahiaGuide
(local specialist, active on the French-speaking Brazil Forums for over 16 years now)
Hello,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi there,
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
Hi,
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
Hi there,
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
Hi,
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
Hi,
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
Hello,
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
Hello,
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Hi everyone,
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
Hi there!
Has anyone taken the direct flight from CDG to Las Vegas with Air France?
Looking forward to your feedback!
Hey everyone,
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
Hi there,
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric
Hi there,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
Hi there,
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry
Hi there,
I have a question...
Has anyone managed to get a refund from Oman Air?
After a delayed flight, we missed our connecting flight to get home!! At midnight, the flight attendant booked us on a flight to Nice via Munich, even though we were in Munich and wanted to get back to Nice... Too tired from the trip, we didn’t notice the mistake!! The next day, of course, the booking wasn’t valid!! We had to pay again for the flight back to Nice... I’m really struggling!! I think they’re giving me the runaround!! I’ve sent several emails, tried Messenger and WhatsApp, but the only responses I get are: "We need to investigate!! We’ll get back to you in 15 days!!" It’s been over a month!!
I just sent a registered letter (LRAR) to their office at Paris Charles de Gaulle, which is still open!!
Do you have any other suggestions for me?
Thanks in advance for your help! Virginie
After a delayed flight, we missed our connecting flight to get home!! At midnight, the flight attendant booked us on a flight to Nice via Munich, even though we were in Munich and wanted to get back to Nice... Too tired from the trip, we didn’t notice the mistake!! The next day, of course, the booking wasn’t valid!! We had to pay again for the flight back to Nice... I’m really struggling!! I think they’re giving me the runaround!! I’ve sent several emails, tried Messenger and WhatsApp, but the only responses I get are: "We need to investigate!! We’ll get back to you in 15 days!!" It’s been over a month!!
I just sent a registered letter (LRAR) to their office at Paris Charles de Gaulle, which is still open!!
Do you have any other suggestions for me?
Thanks in advance for your help! Virginie
Hi!
Sri Lanka has announced it could run out of fuel in the coming weeks if the Strait of Hormuz remains blocked. The government has implemented a mandatory four-day workweek to save oil, and there are long lines at gas stations due to fears of an early shortage.
In Vietnam, the government has warned all airlines that flights will need to be reduced due to a lack of kerosene. The country imports two-thirds of its jet fuel from China and Thailand, but both countries have now banned exports out of fear of domestic shortages.
The state is asking airlines to plan ahead and park aircraft to drastically reduce operations, starting with domestic flights and then international ones. International carriers will also need to cut back on their rotations.
This will begin in the coming days. 🙁
Hi there,
I’ve got a long layover (about 10 hours) in Seoul on an upcoming trip.
I arrive from Phnom Penh at 7:20 AM and depart for Montreal at 6:00 PM.
First question: Will my checked baggage be transferred automatically? I have a single ticket from KTI to YUL (Air Canada ticket—KTI-ICN operated by Asiana (codeshare) and ICN-YUL by Air Canada).
Second question: I saw it’s possible to join free guided tours (Airport Transit Tour). What do you think of this kind of service? And is my "actual" layover time (accounting for security checks, check-in, etc.) enough to do one of these tours?
Thanks in advance to everyone who chimes in on this!
First question: Will my checked baggage be transferred automatically? I have a single ticket from KTI to YUL (Air Canada ticket—KTI-ICN operated by Asiana (codeshare) and ICN-YUL by Air Canada).
Second question: I saw it’s possible to join free guided tours (Airport Transit Tour). What do you think of this kind of service? And is my "actual" layover time (accounting for security checks, check-in, etc.) enough to do one of these tours?
Thanks in advance to everyone who chimes in on this!
Hi everyone,
I'm heading to Namibia next May. I'm planning to take a first flight from Paris to Johannesburg with Air France, departing at 11:20 PM and arriving at 11:05 AM in Johannesburg. Then a second flight from Johannesburg to Windhoek at 3:25 PM with South African Airways.
Four hours between the two flights seems enough to catch my connection, but a friend told me I should maybe take the 5:30 PM flight instead because I need to go through immigration, collect my luggage, and check in again. Apparently, I have to do this because I bought the two tickets separately (it's actually much cheaper).
What do you think?
Also, in terms of South African airlines, which one do you think is the most reliable between South African Airways and Airlink?
Thanks for your advice!!
So, even before starting my explanation, I’d like to introduce myself since this is my first post on the forum :) I’m Jérôme, a huge Asia enthusiast, and I’m currently in the process of moving to Japan with my family in 2028.
Now, onto the topic :)
We’re a family of four traveling together to Seoul, with two separate bookings.
Our original itinerary was: Madrid → Doha → Seoul (March 23–24)
The issue is that our entire outbound flight was canceled, and the airline simply rescheduled the Madrid → Doha leg. Now we’re left with an incomplete journey, with no solution to reach our final destination (Seoul).
Since then:
- Can’t modify flights online (technical error every time) - Can’t get help via chat or WhatsApp - Phone support is unreachable, and the usual French number isn’t working right now
We don’t want a refund. We just want to be rerouted to Seoul, as our original ticket promised.
We’re flexible:
- On dates (we can leave on March 21 or 22 instead of the 23rd) - On the itinerary (different layovers if needed)
Have any of you dealt with this before? Do you know how to unlock a booking in this case or get a rerouting? We’re considering going straight to the airport to resolve it at the Qatar Airways counter....
Thanks so much for your help! 😊
Now, onto the topic :)
We’re a family of four traveling together to Seoul, with two separate bookings.
Our original itinerary was: Madrid → Doha → Seoul (March 23–24)
The issue is that our entire outbound flight was canceled, and the airline simply rescheduled the Madrid → Doha leg. Now we’re left with an incomplete journey, with no solution to reach our final destination (Seoul).
Since then:
- Can’t modify flights online (technical error every time) - Can’t get help via chat or WhatsApp - Phone support is unreachable, and the usual French number isn’t working right now
We don’t want a refund. We just want to be rerouted to Seoul, as our original ticket promised.
We’re flexible:
- On dates (we can leave on March 21 or 22 instead of the 23rd) - On the itinerary (different layovers if needed)
Have any of you dealt with this before? Do you know how to unlock a booking in this case or get a rerouting? We’re considering going straight to the airport to resolve it at the Qatar Airways counter....
Thanks so much for your help! 😊
Hi,
We just received an email from Volotea saying our flight time has changed (by more than 2 hours).
The email states "you can request a free date change."
If I change the date, will the flight price stay the same as the original price, or will I have to pay the difference?
Specifically: Our flight on the 7th is 46.25 €, and the one on the 8th is 92.51 €. If we switch to the 8th, how much will we pay?
When I request the date change to the 8th, it says "No additional fees."
Thanks and have a great day! 🙂
Hi everyone,
We’re going on a Nile cruise.
My question:
We’re taking off from Brussels Airport to land in Cairo.
Then we have to catch a second flight to Luxor.
How does that work—do we pick up our luggage, do we have to exit and then re-enter the airport?
Thanks for your help, tips, and advice, etc.…





