Donc sur le papier le vol cathay pacific semble plus équilibré, et donc plus reposant, quelqu'un a-t-il fait ce voyage avec l'une de ces compagnies (ou une autre) ? Tous vos avis sont les bienvenus. Merci d'avance
Quelle compagnie pour faire Paris - Auckland en classe affaire?
by Sylviannefd
This discussion is in French, the community’s main language.
Original post
Bonjour,
Nous devons bientôt réserver nos vols et nous hésitons entre Emirates et Cathay Pacific qui proposent des prix identiques (autour de 4500€ par personne) pour des sièges équivalents. Tout le reste est différent.
Emirates : A380 Paris-Dubai durée du vol 6h30 escale de 3h30 Dubai-Sydney 14h30 courte escale et 3h de vol pour Auckland. si l'on ajoute le vol Montpellier Paris cela nous fait 4 escales🤪
Cathay pacific: 777 Paris- Hong-Kong durée du vol 12 h escale 4 heures Hong-Kong Auckland 12h
Donc sur le papier le vol cathay pacific semble plus équilibré, et donc plus reposant, quelqu'un a-t-il fait ce voyage avec l'une de ces compagnies (ou une autre) ? Tous vos avis sont les bienvenus. Merci d'avance
Donc sur le papier le vol cathay pacific semble plus équilibré, et donc plus reposant, quelqu'un a-t-il fait ce voyage avec l'une de ces compagnies (ou une autre) ? Tous vos avis sont les bienvenus. Merci d'avance
Bonjour, je connais Cathay mais en classe eco. Ce que je peux vous dire pour avoir fait le trajet Sydney-Paris AR 4 fois y compris avec un jeune enfant et un bebe, c'est que la difference se fait au niveau des escales. 4 escales c'est tres fatiguant. Une escale c'est gerable. Si vous avez de la flexibilite et du temps je vous conseillerais meme de prendre 1 ou 2 nuits en hotel sur place a HK. Ca permet de couper le voyage en 2 et il y a plein de choses sympas a voir a HK ca vaut vraiment le coup.
Bonjour,
Nous devons bientôt réserver nos vols et nous hésitons entre Emirates et Cathay Pacific qui proposent des prix identiques (autour de 4500€ par personne) pour des sièges équivalents. Tout le reste est différent.
Emirates : A380 Paris-Dubai durée du vol 6h30 escale de 3h30 Dubai-Sydney 14h30 courte escale et 3h de vol pour Auckland. si l'on ajoute le vol Montpellier Paris cela nous fait 4 escales🤪
Cathay pacific: 777 Paris- Hong-Kong durée du vol 12 h escale 4 heures Hong-Kong Auckland 12h
Donc sur le papier le vol cathay pacific semble plus équilibré, et donc plus reposant, quelqu'un a-t-il fait ce voyage avec l'une de ces compagnies (ou une autre) ? Tous vos avis sont les bienvenus. Merci d'avance
Difficile de recommander quelque chose car cela dépend de vos préférences.
Les sièges sont différents d'une compagnie à l'autre. Entre HKG et AKL vous aurez probablement l'ancienne classe affaires. Alors que avec EK, vous aurez le même produit de bout en bout.
La cabine affaire de l'A380 de EK est bluffante.
Donc sur le papier le vol cathay pacific semble plus équilibré, et donc plus reposant, quelqu'un a-t-il fait ce voyage avec l'une de ces compagnies (ou une autre) ? Tous vos avis sont les bienvenus. Merci d'avance
Difficile de recommander quelque chose car cela dépend de vos préférences.
Les sièges sont différents d'une compagnie à l'autre. Entre HKG et AKL vous aurez probablement l'ancienne classe affaires. Alors que avec EK, vous aurez le même produit de bout en bout.
La cabine affaire de l'A380 de EK est bluffante.
je pense sincèrement qu'Emirates met une claque à tout le monde en ce moment
même en éco, leur prestation est au dessus du lot, alors la business...
singapore airlines avait déjà levé le niveau lors de l'arrivée de l'A380, mais Emirates a mis le paquet et je pense qu'on va encore attendre qq années avant de voir une autre compagnie la rattraper
même en éco, leur prestation est au dessus du lot, alors la business...
singapore airlines avait déjà levé le niveau lors de l'arrivée de l'A380, mais Emirates a mis le paquet et je pense qu'on va encore attendre qq années avant de voir une autre compagnie la rattraper
Bonjour
en fait tout le problème est là, je sais qu'Emirates est bien au dessus au niveau service, mais ce qui me fait peur c'est le déséquilibre du vol et le nombre d'escales.
Montpellier Paris (ça c'est normal pour nous) puis Paris Dubaï seulement 6h30 de vol donc en décollant à 21h10 si on enlève 2 heures au début pour le repas et une heure avant l'atterrissage il ne reste que 3 h 30 de repos et on arrive à 3 heures du matin heure française et si je me souviens bien des couloirs interminables et 3 h 30 dans un salon certes avant de ré-embarquer pour un vol de 14 h 30 et quand nous arriverons à Sydney il nous faudra de nouveau embarquer pour un vol de 3 h 30. et c'est la raison pour laquelle je me demande si la différence de qualité vaut la fatigue supplémentaire.
Je vais rappeler Emirates ce matin pour savoir comment se passe le transit à Dubaï et à Sydney et si ils fournissent la voiture avec chauffeur à l'arrivée à Auckland ce qui serait un plus.
Merci d'avoir répondu
Perso j'eliminerai Emirates, parce que 4 escales çà fait beaucoup, et en plus, meme si c'est une très bonne compagnie, elle ne se situe pas au dessus des meilleures compagnies au monde ( j'ai voyagé une fois avec eux en classe Affaires, j'ai passé un bon voyage, meme si j'ai trouvé le service à bord moins bon que sur les meilleurs compagnies asiatiques )
Cathay me parait une meilleure option, tu devrais consulter aussi les tarifs de Singapore Airlines, ils doivent etre les plus directs, le produit est meilleur, et je les ai déjà pris sur l'Australie en classe Affaires à des tarifs autour de 3700/3800 EUR TTC ( je n'ai pas gardé la facture car ce n'est pas moi qui payait, mais en tout cas, c'était un peu en dessous de 4000 )
Dans tous les cas, c'est un choix confortable, c'est un peu comme hésiter sur la carte des vins entre un Vosne Romanée ou un Gevrey Chambertin 😄
Cathay me parait une meilleure option, tu devrais consulter aussi les tarifs de Singapore Airlines, ils doivent etre les plus directs, le produit est meilleur, et je les ai déjà pris sur l'Australie en classe Affaires à des tarifs autour de 3700/3800 EUR TTC ( je n'ai pas gardé la facture car ce n'est pas moi qui payait, mais en tout cas, c'était un peu en dessous de 4000 )
Dans tous les cas, c'est un choix confortable, c'est un peu comme hésiter sur la carte des vins entre un Vosne Romanée ou un Gevrey Chambertin 😄
Tyrolien
It's a beautifull day - don't let it get away -
bonjour,
j'ai regardé Singapore Airlines mais ils sont à plus de 5 500€ donc 1 000€ de + par personne.
Mais Cathay pacific me parait vraiment bien en plus c'est le même avion jusqu'à Auckland donc pas le problème des 777 pas encore modifiés. Il me reste encore 2 ou 3 semaines avant de pouvoir réserver, sinon j'ai trouvé des tarifs plus bas avec Malaysia Airlines 3500€ avec escale à Kuala Lumpur mais je ne connais pas du tout la compagnie.
Malaisia Airline semble être une très bonne compagnie, de plus ils envoient maintenant leurs A380 sur Paris.
Si vous souhaitez avoir un aperçu des prestations/cabines... de différentes compagnies, jetez un oeil à ce site: http://flight-report.com/
Vous devrez y trouver votre bonheur.
😉
😉
Mon blog voyage : http://kevinelpaso.blogspot.com/
Bonsoir,
L'option malaysian très bonne compagnie classe affaire très bien , mais même avec 4 stops Emirate serait mon choix tous vos vols peuvent êtres réalisés en 380 A/R le pont supérieur pratiquement dédié à la classe affaire avec un bar en queue c'est un avion au dessus d'un autre le vol de 14h entre Dubai et Sydney vous permettra de vous reposer sans aucun problème le produit est excellent ce qui n'est pas toujours le cas sur les autres avions de la flotte.
Bon vol (voyez également Koréan parfois il y a des promos ou china airlines, et thai)
L'option malaysian très bonne compagnie classe affaire très bien , mais même avec 4 stops Emirate serait mon choix tous vos vols peuvent êtres réalisés en 380 A/R le pont supérieur pratiquement dédié à la classe affaire avec un bar en queue c'est un avion au dessus d'un autre le vol de 14h entre Dubai et Sydney vous permettra de vous reposer sans aucun problème le produit est excellent ce qui n'est pas toujours le cas sur les autres avions de la flotte.
Bon vol (voyez également Koréan parfois il y a des promos ou china airlines, et thai)
Bonjour
Vous parlez de china airlines, est-ce une compagnie sure? j'ai tendance à ne pas trop faire confiance à tout ce qui est chinois🤪
L'une des compagnies China Eastern ou Southern China je ne sais plus est en "codeshare" avec Air France...cela dit je ne fais pas confiance a Air France non plus! Les compagnies chinoises sont sures a mon avis, mais il ne faut rien attendre cote service. On a ce qu'on paie pour en gros. Depuis Sydney ce sont les billets moins chers pour la France mais service nul.
Perso je prefere les compagnies asiatiques type Singapore Airlines (le top) ou Cathay ou encore Malaysia Airlines. Il y a un sens du service unique qui n'existe pas ailleurs dans le monde.
Perso je prefere les compagnies asiatiques type Singapore Airlines (le top) ou Cathay ou encore Malaysia Airlines. Il y a un sens du service unique qui n'existe pas ailleurs dans le monde.
Bonjour,
Malaysia Airlines est beaucoup moins cher 3250€ au lieu de 4500 pour Cathay Pacific et 5000 pour Emirates 5500 pour singapore Airlines.
Le vol Paris Kuala Lumpur se fait en A380 et le vol Kuala lumpur Auckland et Sydney Kuala Lumpur en 777-200 Donc à ce prix là compte tenu du service proposé il n'y a pas à hésiter en effet. Il ne me reste plus qu'à attendre de pouvoir réserver mes vols puisque notre retour est le 11 avril 2014 donc pas avant la fin mai je pense.
Merci à ceux qui m'ont aidé dans mon choix.
Bonjour,
Malaysia Airlines est beaucoup moins cher 3250€ au lieu de 4500 pour Cathay Pacific et 5000 pour Emirates 5500 pour singapore Airlines.
Le vol Paris Kuala Lumpur se fait en A380 et le vol Kuala lumpur Auckland et Sydney Kuala Lumpur en 777-200 Donc à ce prix là compte tenu du service proposé il n'y a pas à hésiter en effet. Il ne me reste plus qu'à attendre de pouvoir réserver mes vols puisque notre retour est le 11 avril 2014 donc pas avant la fin mai je pense.
Merci à ceux qui m'ont aidé dans mon choix.
Le produit MH n'est pas comparable à celui de CX. Si vous avez le budget, prenez CX.
Sinon, MH est une option de repli très acceptable.
Le produit MH n'est pas comparable à celui de CX. Si vous avez le budget, prenez CX.
Sinon, MH est une option de repli très acceptable.
Pour info je viens de prendre les billets pour Paris depuis Sydney comme chaque annee. En principe nous voyageons sur Singapore Airlines (nous sommes une famille de 4) mais cette annee j'ai pris mes billets avec Malaysia Airlines qui en effet propose des prix defiant toute concurrence pour le lancement de leur A380 entre KL et Paris. Ca veut dire A380 tout neuf + super service. Aucune hesitation: prenez Malaysia Airlines. C'est une compagnie 5 etoiles selon le classement SkyTrax.
Pourquoi pas NZ ?
J'ai été très agréablement surpris par la J d'NZ.
2 FR sur le vol LHR-LAX-LHR.
LHR-LAX NZ J LAX-LHR NZ J
La cabine est en 1-2-1 full flat. Les horaires adapté pour aller de bout en bout.
J'ai été très agréablement surpris par la J d'NZ.
2 FR sur le vol LHR-LAX-LHR.
LHR-LAX NZ J LAX-LHR NZ J
La cabine est en 1-2-1 full flat. Les horaires adapté pour aller de bout en bout.
Oops j'oubliais de dire, sur Cathay certains avions qui font la liaison Paris - HK sont des vieux Boeing 747 en fin de course. La seule fois ou j'ai voyage avec Cathay il y a 5 ans la refrigeration de l'avion est tombe en panne alors que nous n'avions pas encore decolle de Paris. Resultat 2h sur le tarmac et impossible de reparer la clim. Ils ont decide de partir quand meme et on palie au pb avec de la glace.
Conclusion, si vous souhaitez voler sur Cathay, verifier bien quel type d'avion sera utilise pour le trajet Paris - HK.
Conclusion, si vous souhaitez voler sur Cathay, verifier bien quel type d'avion sera utilise pour le trajet Paris - HK.
(...) Aucune hesitation: prenez Malaysia Airlines. C'est une compagnie 5 etoiles selon le classement SkyTrax.
Vous parlez bien vite. Le siège affaires de MH est incliné, le service repas est moyen, les PNC très bien mais pas toujours.
MH a beaucoup perdu et n'est pas au niveau de CX. Ils restent sympathiques, le produit est acceptable pour le prix, mais de là à dire "aucune hésitation..."
sur Cathay certains avions qui font la liaison Paris - HK sont des vieux Boeing 747 en fin de course.
Les deux vols quotidiens assurés au départ de CDG sont:
- pour le vol du soir en A340 avec l’ancienne classe affaire, mais qui était déjà équipée de sièges-lits plat et horizontaux mais en configuration assez bizarre
- pour le vol de milieu de journée en 777 avec la nouvelle classe affaire qui semble très bien.
Dans les deux cas, le service est le même, c'est à dire superbe.
Vous parlez bien vite. Le siège affaires de MH est incliné, le service repas est moyen, les PNC très bien mais pas toujours.
MH a beaucoup perdu et n'est pas au niveau de CX. Ils restent sympathiques, le produit est acceptable pour le prix, mais de là à dire "aucune hésitation..."
sur Cathay certains avions qui font la liaison Paris - HK sont des vieux Boeing 747 en fin de course.
Les deux vols quotidiens assurés au départ de CDG sont:
- pour le vol du soir en A340 avec l’ancienne classe affaire, mais qui était déjà équipée de sièges-lits plat et horizontaux mais en configuration assez bizarre
- pour le vol de milieu de journée en 777 avec la nouvelle classe affaire qui semble très bien.
Dans les deux cas, le service est le même, c'est à dire superbe.
Il est certain que sur le 777 de MA les sièges sont les mêmes que sur les avions d'AF, mais le Paris Kuala Lumpur se fait en A380 avec des sièges lits donc c'est quand même pas mal pour le prix. Après c'est sur que si Emirates fait une promo autour de 3800€ 3900€ comme il le fait à certaines dates compte tenu de la limousine qui vous conduit à votre hôtel à l'arrivée, on prendra Emirates, quand j'ai appelé Cathay la personne m'a parlé de 777 pas d'A340 pourtant c'est le vol du soir qui nous intéresserait si on prenait leur vol.
A suivre🤪
Il est certain que sur le 777 de MA les sièges sont les mêmes que sur les avions d'AF
Lesquels? NEV2, NEV3, NEV4 avec petit écran, NEV4 avec grand écran? 😉 Le siège MH est plus dur que celui d'AF, mais il y a plus de place. Il a un cale pied, que n'a pas le NEV2 (ni le NEV4).
, mais le Paris Kuala Lumpur se fait en A380 avec des sièges lits donc
"Donc"? On met les sièges que l'on veut dans un A 380 (exemple que vous citiez : AF). Liez les reviews et vous verrez que le siège MH est certe horizontal, mais l'appui jambe est abaissé, donc pas "full flat". Inconfortable si vous dormez sur le côté car tension au niveau des genoux.
c'est quand même pas mal pour le prix.
Là, je vous suis. Si le prix est bon, MH reste un alternative envisageable, ; mais n'attendez pas le même confort que sur CX ou EK.
quand j'ai appelé Cathay la personne m'a parlé de 777 pas d'A340 pourtant c'est le vol du soir qui nous intéresserait si on prenait leur vol. A suivre🤪
Paris (PAR) Vers Hong-Kong (HKG): mer. 29 mai Vol De Vers Stop(s) Durée Appareil
CX260 CDG 13:15 HKG 06:45 +1 0 11:30 77W
CX278 CDG 21:20 HKG 15:05 +1 0 11:45 343
Lesquels? NEV2, NEV3, NEV4 avec petit écran, NEV4 avec grand écran? 😉 Le siège MH est plus dur que celui d'AF, mais il y a plus de place. Il a un cale pied, que n'a pas le NEV2 (ni le NEV4).
, mais le Paris Kuala Lumpur se fait en A380 avec des sièges lits donc
"Donc"? On met les sièges que l'on veut dans un A 380 (exemple que vous citiez : AF). Liez les reviews et vous verrez que le siège MH est certe horizontal, mais l'appui jambe est abaissé, donc pas "full flat". Inconfortable si vous dormez sur le côté car tension au niveau des genoux.
c'est quand même pas mal pour le prix.
Là, je vous suis. Si le prix est bon, MH reste un alternative envisageable, ; mais n'attendez pas le même confort que sur CX ou EK.
quand j'ai appelé Cathay la personne m'a parlé de 777 pas d'A340 pourtant c'est le vol du soir qui nous intéresserait si on prenait leur vol. A suivre🤪
Paris (PAR) Vers Hong-Kong (HKG): mer. 29 mai Vol De Vers Stop(s) Durée Appareil
CX260 CDG 13:15 HKG 06:45 +1 0 11:30 77W
CX278 CDG 21:20 HKG 15:05 +1 0 11:45 343
Hello,
Juste pour signaler qu'Emirates a un départ de Lyon Saint Exupéry (idéal pour les gens du sud). Je viens de rentrer d'Inde avec Emirates en classe éco. Problème technique sur l'avion à Dubaï = 3 h de retard et je n'avais plus de train pour rentrer sur Avignon. J'ai du rentrer en voiture (heureusement que je n'étais pas à Paris). Avion suffisamment confortable et nourriture correcte (régime végétarien).
Je suis allée en Nouvelle Zélande (Paris-Hong Kong-Auckland) avec Cathay en 2010 en classe éco. Rien à redire, nourriture correcte (menu végetarien). Au retour, escale de 2 jours à Hong Kong sans supplément.
A savoir, Emirates propose des vols sur Christchurch (île du Sud en Nouvelle Zélande). Cela peut aussi être un atout : attérir sur l'île du nord et repartir de Christchurch.
Bon voyage,
Jenny
Juste pour signaler qu'Emirates a un départ de Lyon Saint Exupéry (idéal pour les gens du sud). Je viens de rentrer d'Inde avec Emirates en classe éco. Problème technique sur l'avion à Dubaï = 3 h de retard et je n'avais plus de train pour rentrer sur Avignon. J'ai du rentrer en voiture (heureusement que je n'étais pas à Paris). Avion suffisamment confortable et nourriture correcte (régime végétarien).
Je suis allée en Nouvelle Zélande (Paris-Hong Kong-Auckland) avec Cathay en 2010 en classe éco. Rien à redire, nourriture correcte (menu végetarien). Au retour, escale de 2 jours à Hong Kong sans supplément.
A savoir, Emirates propose des vols sur Christchurch (île du Sud en Nouvelle Zélande). Cela peut aussi être un atout : attérir sur l'île du nord et repartir de Christchurch.
Bon voyage,
Jenny
"Fais de ta vie un rêve et d'un rêve une réalité" Antoine de Saint Exupéry
Pour ceux qui lisent l'anglais un site pas mal c'est SkyTrax qui repertorie les commentaires des voyageurs par compagnie, par itineraire etc...les avis sont excellents concernant l'A380 de malaysia airlines.
Perso je prefere voyager en A380 plutot que de voyager dans un avion plus vieux mais avoir une limousine a l'arrivee...je trouve que pour un vol de 13h le confort de l'avion est tres important. Le service l'est aussi d'ou ma preference pour singapore airlines. Cela dit on est pas du genre tres exigeants et pourtant on voyage avec de jeunes enfants. Sur des vols long couriers je suis plutot du genre a me lever pour aller chercher un verre d'eau et marcher un peu qu'a bipper l'hotesse de l'air toutes les 5min...du moment que l'accueil est chaleureux et qu'on a un sourire et pas un "quoi encore?" alors ca me va tres bien.
Perso je prefere voyager en A380 plutot que de voyager dans un avion plus vieux mais avoir une limousine a l'arrivee...je trouve que pour un vol de 13h le confort de l'avion est tres important. Le service l'est aussi d'ou ma preference pour singapore airlines. Cela dit on est pas du genre tres exigeants et pourtant on voyage avec de jeunes enfants. Sur des vols long couriers je suis plutot du genre a me lever pour aller chercher un verre d'eau et marcher un peu qu'a bipper l'hotesse de l'air toutes les 5min...du moment que l'accueil est chaleureux et qu'on a un sourire et pas un "quoi encore?" alors ca me va tres bien.
Pour ceux qui lisent l'anglais un site pas mal c'est SkyTrax qui repertorie les commentaires des voyageurs par compagnie, par itineraire etc...les avis sont excellents concernant l'A380 de malaysia airlines. (...).
Les avis sur Skytrax à propos du siège en classe affaires:
- The most uncomfortable business class seat I have ever tried to sleep on. Very hard and bottom half of seat slopes down at an angle so neither a flat bed or a lie flat bed. Seat can't be adjusted when table in use either for some weird reason. How this seat got approved is beyond me and MH now years behind the competition on what are brand new planes. Would never fly on this seat again.
- These seats are appalling. Even the old Singapore & Qantas business seats that were on a slope for sleeping are more comfortable. They are hard, you can not independently adjust the foot rest vs back to try and even find a compromise position of comfort for sleep. That is somewhere between bolt upright and sliding off the seat. You do feel need to 'stand' in your seat to cease the sliding effect. Head rest cuts into back of neck as rock hard and the token pillow isn't going to solve that.
ainsi que sur Business Traveller:
- The product was wide and comfortable but could have been better for sleeping as even when fully reclined the legrest did not seem to come up high enough to create a completely horizontal bed. No undersheets or sleep suits were provided and the pillow could have been bigger, but I liked the large soft cotton coverlet provided.
- The seat is a strange one. It has a pitch of 74 inches (188cm) and reclines into a bed of 72 inches (183cm), but although it reclines fully-flat, this doesn’t include the leg rest, which droops slightly when horizontal. If you are lying on your back, to be honest, it’s almost unnoticeable, but if you sleep on your side, it creates a build-up of tension in your knees, which isn’t great.
Tout cela pour dire que si MH reste un choix acceptable en classes affaires si le prix est plius bas que celui de la concurrence, cette compagnie n'est pas au niveau des CX, EK, SQ et autres du genre.
Les avis sur Skytrax à propos du siège en classe affaires:
- The most uncomfortable business class seat I have ever tried to sleep on. Very hard and bottom half of seat slopes down at an angle so neither a flat bed or a lie flat bed. Seat can't be adjusted when table in use either for some weird reason. How this seat got approved is beyond me and MH now years behind the competition on what are brand new planes. Would never fly on this seat again.
- These seats are appalling. Even the old Singapore & Qantas business seats that were on a slope for sleeping are more comfortable. They are hard, you can not independently adjust the foot rest vs back to try and even find a compromise position of comfort for sleep. That is somewhere between bolt upright and sliding off the seat. You do feel need to 'stand' in your seat to cease the sliding effect. Head rest cuts into back of neck as rock hard and the token pillow isn't going to solve that.
ainsi que sur Business Traveller:
- The product was wide and comfortable but could have been better for sleeping as even when fully reclined the legrest did not seem to come up high enough to create a completely horizontal bed. No undersheets or sleep suits were provided and the pillow could have been bigger, but I liked the large soft cotton coverlet provided.
- The seat is a strange one. It has a pitch of 74 inches (188cm) and reclines into a bed of 72 inches (183cm), but although it reclines fully-flat, this doesn’t include the leg rest, which droops slightly when horizontal. If you are lying on your back, to be honest, it’s almost unnoticeable, but if you sleep on your side, it creates a build-up of tension in your knees, which isn’t great.
Tout cela pour dire que si MH reste un choix acceptable en classes affaires si le prix est plius bas que celui de la concurrence, cette compagnie n'est pas au niveau des CX, EK, SQ et autres du genre.
en effet, je regardais plutot les commentaires pour la classe eco sur le nouvel A380 qui eux sont excellents.
pour ma part quand je prends un billet Sydney - Paris je privilegie:
- le type d'avion - A380 si possible quitte a payer un peu plus cher
- le service - pour cette raison je boycotte Air France, Qantas et British Airways, et je privilegie les compagnies asiatiques bien plus aux petits soins avec ses clients (et pourtant on est des clients faciles!)
- la duree des escales
Merci pour le relais de cette information, donc si j'arrive à avoir des prix acceptables sur Emirates je prendrai Emirates avec des vols en A380, cela nous évite une nuit d'hôtel à Paris puisque le départ est à 21h10 au lieu de 12 heures. Leurs prix sont variables de 3900€ à 4600€ pour le même voyage, la disposition des sièges en classe affaire n'est pas très pratique quand on voyage à deux, cela oblige à réserver tôt la plupart des sièges étant individuels, mais à force de chercher je vais finir par trouver le bon compromis. De toute façon nous venons de payer 2300€ en premium voyager sur AF un Paris Buenos-Aires, donc les prix pour ce voyage en classe affaire quel que soit la compagnie choisie est raisonnable.
(...), la disposition des sièges en classe affaire n'est pas très pratique quand on voyage à deux, cela oblige à réserver tôt la plupart des sièges étant individuels, (...)
Pas vraiment.
Regardez le plan de cabine et vous verrez que la dispo est 1-2-1.
Un rang sur deux, les deux sièges du milieu sont à touche-touche avec le minibar pour le siège de gauche à gauche du siège et pour le siège de droite à droite de celui-ci.
Pour le rang suivant, les deux sièges sont côté couloir et les minibars sont à touche-touche au milieu, entre les deux sièges, ce qui les éloigne l'un de l'autre, mais on peut quand même interagir l'un avec l’autre car pas si loin que cela l'un de l’autre, le mieux étant bine sûr la rangée avec les deux sièges contigus.
Pas vraiment.
Regardez le plan de cabine et vous verrez que la dispo est 1-2-1.
Un rang sur deux, les deux sièges du milieu sont à touche-touche avec le minibar pour le siège de gauche à gauche du siège et pour le siège de droite à droite de celui-ci.
Pour le rang suivant, les deux sièges sont côté couloir et les minibars sont à touche-touche au milieu, entre les deux sièges, ce qui les éloigne l'un de l'autre, mais on peut quand même interagir l'un avec l’autre car pas si loin que cela l'un de l’autre, le mieux étant bine sûr la rangée avec les deux sièges contigus.
Je voulais juste dire qu'il ne faut pas trop tarder pour réserver les sièges de 2 avec les mini-bars sur les cotés.
Mais là je deviens exigeante le nec plus ultra le moins cher possible😉
Bonsoir,
Moi j'ai volé avec Cathay pour l'Australie mais en class eco et elle vaut bien ses 5 étoiles. Tout a été parfait ! Je repars avec eux mercredi prochain pour Perth et je vais faire le Auckland-Paris avec eux également en novembre prochain.😉
Moi j'ai volé avec Cathay pour l'Australie mais en class eco et elle vaut bien ses 5 étoiles. Tout a été parfait ! Je repars avec eux mercredi prochain pour Perth et je vais faire le Auckland-Paris avec eux également en novembre prochain.😉
Cordialement,
Patrick.
Il y a plusieurs choix pour un Paris-Auckland mais si vous êtes membre de Flying Blue vous avez Korean Air via Séoul avec en prime un Airbus a 380 mais allez aussi voir chez Singapore Airlines ou Malaysia Airlines et évitez Emirates en raison de 2 éscales au lieu d'une seule.
Il y a plusieurs choix pour un Paris-Auckland mais si vous êtes membre de Flying Blue vous avez Korean Air via Séoul avec en prime un Airbus a 380
Bonjour le détour, non?
mais allez aussi voir chez Singapore Airlines
Bon choix, mais d'après notre forumeuse, ils sont nettement plus chers
ou Malaysia Airlines
Mauvais siège sur l'A380; service en baisse.
et évitez Emirates en raison de 2 éscales au lieu d'une seule.
Ca peut avoir son charme. Et la classe affaires sur l'A380 Emirates est top. On ne voit pas le temps passer.
Bonjour le détour, non?
mais allez aussi voir chez Singapore Airlines
Bon choix, mais d'après notre forumeuse, ils sont nettement plus chers
ou Malaysia Airlines
Mauvais siège sur l'A380; service en baisse.
et évitez Emirates en raison de 2 éscales au lieu d'une seule.
Ca peut avoir son charme. Et la classe affaires sur l'A380 Emirates est top. On ne voit pas le temps passer.
bonsoir,
en fait mon choix s'est porté sur Emirates. Si vous ajoutez la voiture avec chauffeur qui vous attend à Auckland pour vous conduire à votre hôtel et vous évite le taxi idem pour Sydney au retour, le différentiel entre Emirates et Malaysia est très faible d'autant plus que les horaires de Malaysia nous obligeaient à passer une nuit à Roissy avant le départ. Donc nous allons pouvoir tester le confort d'Emirates en mars 2014.
Log in first, then come back to this page.
You might also like
More discussions
Bonjour
Je prévois de voyager cet hiver à travers l'Inde. Départ début décembre, retour en France à la mi-avril.
Ma préoccupation principale est de trouver La companie aérienne qui assure cet aller-retour avec le moins de soucis possibles sur les annulations ou les changements d'horaires de vol. Le contexte géopolitique agité au Moyen-Orient ne m'aide pas dans cette recherche, les avis récents lus en ligne sur les compagnies des États du Gulf décrivent pas mal de galères vécues ces derniers mois.
Les vols directs Paris-Delhi A/R que proposent Air France ou Air India sont probablement les plus sûrs mais pas les moins chers !
Dans ce doute, je patiente encore pour finaliser cet achat de billet... Avec peut-être quelques conseils et avis d'expériences des amoureux des Zindes sur VoyageForum.
Merci et Bons Voyages à tous.
Hi,
I’m thinking of heading to Malaysia soon.
I’ve seen some great prices and direct flights from Paris with Malaysia Airlines.
Is it a reliable airline?
Thanks for your feedback!
Hello,
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August. My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August. My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Hi there,
We had planned a trip to Sicily in August, and due to the volcanic eruption of Mount Etna, my flight was canceled. The airline is refunding the outbound flight, but none of the non-refundable expenses: accommodation booked through Booking, rental car, and the return flight aren’t covered. My SUPER Gold card doesn’t work in this specific case! :( If anyone has been in this situation, could you let me know if you were able to get any recourse and, if so, how?
Thanks in advance
I’ve been traveling regularly for over twenty years,
but this is the first time an airline has treated me as poorly as Air France.
Two trips, two problems. The latest:
Trip from Seoul to Rennes. Last leg from Paris CDG to Rennes with Air France.
I arrive in Paris and go straight to Air France to get my boarding pass to Rennes. They assure me my baggage is continuing to Rennes.
Arriving in Rennes, no baggage—same as five other people.
The Air France office is closed, and the airport staff tell me there’s rarely anyone there.
With the help of the airport staff, I file a claim online, and my baggage is almost immediately located. As a result, I’m told I’ll have it the next day.
Four days later, the baggage is still in the same place at CDG—nothing’s moving.
The problem is Air France has no customer service. What they call customer service is a department that takes an hour to answer and just repeats what’s on the online form. No coordination, no way to get things moving. I guess Air France would rather pay the compensation after 21 days than actually do something.
I’ve had lost baggage on other trips, but this is the first time I’ve seen such indifference and lack of professionalism.
but this is the first time an airline has treated me as poorly as Air France.
Two trips, two problems. The latest:
Trip from Seoul to Rennes. Last leg from Paris CDG to Rennes with Air France.
I arrive in Paris and go straight to Air France to get my boarding pass to Rennes. They assure me my baggage is continuing to Rennes.
Arriving in Rennes, no baggage—same as five other people.
The Air France office is closed, and the airport staff tell me there’s rarely anyone there.
With the help of the airport staff, I file a claim online, and my baggage is almost immediately located. As a result, I’m told I’ll have it the next day.
Four days later, the baggage is still in the same place at CDG—nothing’s moving.
The problem is Air France has no customer service. What they call customer service is a department that takes an hour to answer and just repeats what’s on the online form. No coordination, no way to get things moving. I guess Air France would rather pay the compensation after 21 days than actually do something.
I’ve had lost baggage on other trips, but this is the first time I’ve seen such indifference and lack of professionalism.
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi,
I booked an Etihad ticket on their website for Dusseldorf-Abu Dhabi. In the first name field, I entered all my first names (something I never do and I regret it, but the site was confusing). Everything is spelled correctly, but the problem is that I just received my new passport and only my first two first names and the first letter of the third appear—there’s no trace of the last one.
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in. Thanks for your feedback!
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in. Thanks for your feedback!
Hi everyone,
Next January, I’m heading to India.
My outbound flight is with Emirates from Paris to Dubai, then another Emirates flight from Dubai to Calcutta.
Could anyone tell me how the connection works? I’ve heard there’s a dedicated Emirates zone, but how does it actually work in practice—I’ve got a 2-hour layover.
Thanks so much!
Take care.
Hi there,
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon. I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport. Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…). AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly. On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double! In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others? Given the price difference, I’m hesitant… Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go? Thanks, HERVE
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon. I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport. Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…). AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly. On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double! In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others? Given the price difference, I’m hesitant… Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go? Thanks, HERVE
Hi everyone, I’ve unfortunately only just noticed that I booked two flight tickets, but I made a mistake on the second first name. Basically, my computer auto-filled and typed my first name twice, so both tickets are in my first name. Only the last names—mine and my friend’s—are correct.
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common). I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common). I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
Hello,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Hi there,
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
Hi,
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
Hi there,
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
Hi,
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
Hi,
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
Hello,
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
Hello,
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Hi everyone,
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
Hi there!
Has anyone taken the direct flight from CDG to Las Vegas with Air France?
Looking forward to your feedback!
Hey everyone,
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
Hi there,
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric
Hi there,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,



