C'est vrai que 100 dirhams soit 9 €... c'est énooooooooooooooorme ! ... à peine le prix d'un paquet de clopes.
Les compagnies aériennes low cost nous prennent vraiment pour des c...
On ne voyage pas pour chercher son destin mais pour fuir l’endroit d’où on est parti. (Miguel de Unamuno)
L'homme est un dieu quand il rêve, et un mendiant quand il réfléchit (Friedrich Holderlin)
Dans l'absolu ce n'est pas énorme.
Mais sur un billet à 50 € ça représente quand même 20 % ...
Ce qui m'interpelle, c'est la raison de la création de cette taxe pour, entre autre, promouvoir le tourisme ...🤪
Quant à la raison du désengagement d'easyJet, j'ai le sentiment que l'instauration de cette taxe est plutôt le prétexte pour supprimer une ligne moins rentable.😕
" Nous ne saurons jamais tout le bien qu'un simple sourire peut être capable de faire."
Mère Teresa
J'espère que c'est juste pour faire pression sur le Maroc pour qu'il retire la taxe.
A Fes je prends souvent easyjet les avions sont toujours blindés. Il y a d'ailleurs le nouveau terminal d'aéroport qui va ouvrir ca semble en contradiction avec la fermeture de lignes.
Pour nous c'est une très mauvaise nouvelle, avant la concurrence des low-cost les billets d'avions étaient beaucoup plus chers.
Bonjour
En fait cette taxe, est instaurée pour compenser la baisse du budjet allouée au tourisme cette année...et surement les années suivantes
Quant au désengagement d'Easy jet sur les lignes marocaines, j'ai pas vraiment le meme sentiment que toi. Depuis que cette compagnie assure la liaison sur Casa( 2009 ii me semble) je prend regulièrement tous les mois un aller retour Casa Lyon ou Casa Paris... et bien a chaque fois le remplissage est assurré de 80 à 100% quel que soit la période de l'année
J'espère que ce retrait ne va pas aller a son terme
Cette taxe, de 9€ environ sur un billet n'est pas franchement grand chose pour le voyageur (même, si ça fait c.... 😠)...
Mais easyjet et ryanair tirent les prix au maximum pour être archi-concurrentiels. Leur raison d'être, c'est de proposer à coup sûr les tarifs les plus bas. Si ces compagnies sont confrontées à des taxes supplémentaires, ils rempliront un peu moins leurs avions. Or, un avion pas rempli (ou pire : un avion qui reste au sol), ça coûte très cher (=ce n'est pas rentable), ce qui n'est pasincompatible avec leur "raison d'être", c'est de la perte sèche.
Du coup, pour les lignes déjà à peine rentables (Fès par exemple, pour easyjet), ils ont intérêt à penser suppressions.
Je ne sais plus si c'est ryanair ou easyjet qui a des projets d'étendre leurs flottes sur des lignes européennes. La suppression de lignes "coûteuses" (=pas assez rentables) permet d'en exploiter d'autres.
Dans l'affaire, qu'il s'agisse du Maroc ou des compagnies, de toute façon, ce qui les intéresse, c'est l'argent. En l'occurrence, notre argent...
Dans la même affaire, c'est transavia qui peut tirer tout bénéf', en attirant la clientèle "perdue" par easyjet et ryanair !
J'ai peut être fait une mauvaise analyse de la raison du choix de cette ligne pour se retirer.
Pourquoi ne pas supprimer des lignes sur Agadir ou Marrakech où il y a pléthore de dessertes ?
Ils ont justement un monopole au niveau low cost sur la ville de Tanger, 9 € de plus n'empêchera pas les gens de prendre ces vols qui restent financièrement attractifs. Il n'y a pas de préjudice pour eux.
Alors, pourquoi supprimer cette ligne ?
" Nous ne saurons jamais tout le bien qu'un simple sourire peut être capable de faire."
Mère Teresa
Cette hausse de 9 € concerne toutes les compagnies, qui vont donc toutes la répercuter sur le prix de leur vol.
Celui qui voudra acheter un billet et qui comparera les prix, verra que le différentiel sera toujours le même entre les low cost et les régulières.
Je ne vois donc pas pourquoi les low cost seraient plus pénalisées que RAM par exemple
" Nous ne saurons jamais tout le bien qu'un simple sourire peut être capable de faire."
Mère Teresa
Pour la RAM :
Si j'ai bien compris, les lignes intérieures ne sont pas soumises à la taxe ? Du coup, ils peuvent amortir les coûts sur un budget global. De toute façon, je suis convaincue que la RAM sera exonéré de cette taxe...
Pour les autres compagnies internationales (transavia par ex) : c'est une lowcost, mais ils ont quelques petites marges d'amortissement que n'ont pas ryanair ni easyjet. Par ex, transavia n'annule pas de vol (à ma connaissance) quand ils n'ont que 50 passagers sur un vol (ça va peut-être commencer !).
C'est une question d'amortissement global. On ne verra pas écrit sur les billets "+ 9€". On ne les percevra pas directement sur le prix du billet, même par comparaison entre compagnie.
Je me plante peut-être dans ma logique, mais c'est comme ça que je vois les choses (je suis Bigoudène... -une soussi française, quoi !- la notion d'investissement et de rentabilité, pour moi, c'est un peu instinctif 😛).
Mais bon, je vais arrêter là mon "analyse" à 3 balles....
C'est mm tres tres partiel en fait les "grosses destinations" de Easyjet ... Marrakech ( + de 10 lignes) Casablanca et Agadir avec plusieurs lignes chacune ne sont pas touchées ( parfois mm renforcées au départ Royaume Uni ) donc rien a voir avec cette taxe !
- Tanger et Fes sont 2 destinations opérées uniquement de Paris et peut être les moins demandées en saison estivale ou easyjet a un besoin machine + important !
Easyjet n'a pas communique sur des "abandons" liés a cette taxe et mm c'est l'inverse Easyjet a signé, avec d'autres opérateurs du tourisme, un accord avec le Maroc pour développer les vols au départ du Royaune Uni
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Dans l'absolu ce n'est pas énorme.
Mais sur un billet à 50 € ça représente quand même 20 % ...
Ce qui m'interpelle, c'est la raison de la création de cette taxe pour, entre autre, promouvoir le tourisme ...🤪
Cette taxe sera-t-elle prélevée sur les passagers aussi à l'arrivée, ou uniquement au départ du Maroc ?
Le charabia officiel n'est pas clair là-dessus :
A compter de cette date, une taxe de 100 dh (environ 9 euros) sur la classe économique et de 400 dh (environ 36 euros) sur les classes affaires et en Première sera prélevée sur les émissions de billets d’avion dans le cadre des liaisons aériennes internationales.
Je ne sais pas ce qu'il en est pour les transporteurs high-cost, mais pour les low-cost, j'ai souvent constaté que la grosse majorité des passagers en provenance du Maroc ou y allant sont Marocains ou d'origine marocaine ... Ils paieront un peu plus pour leur pays, c'est patriotique.
VF a changé le titre de mon message initial sans m'en demander l'autorisation !!!!
Ok, je suis d'accord sur le fait que ce fameux retrait est visiblement partiel. Mais de quel droit VF modifie l'écrit d'un internaute sans concertation avec celui-ci ????
Nous avons simplement fait en sorte que le titre soit un minimum compréhensible et explicite, parce que votre titre initial (je cite) easy jet se retire ne voulait pas dire grand chose et était en plus incomplet puisque la compagnie ne quitte pas le Maroc.
La pratique n'a rien d'extraordinaire et c'est quelque chose que nous faisons - et au plus simple - lorsqu'un titre est incomplet, inapproprié, peu explicite, mal orthographié, etc. Après rien n'empêche l'auteur du post de nous contacter si besoin (ce qui est très très rare sur ce point).
J'ai bien compris le sens de votre démarche. Mais je ne suis pas du tout d'accord avec le procédé !
Quand vous déplacez un message d'une rubrique à une autre, vous en informez l'auteur. Normal, puisque c'est vous qui gérez l'organisation de votre forum.
Pourquoi ne respectez-vous pas les écrits des internautes ? On ne change pas comme ça l'écrit de quelqu'un ; vous n'en êtes pas l'auteur. La seule autorité que vous avez sur les écrits, c'est la capacité à retirer des messages qui ne respectent pas la charte de l'utilisateur.
Mais n'avez pas à modifier les écrits des internautes (corps du texte ou titre). Je trouve ça grave en terme de respect de ce qui appartient à l'autre, de l'auteur de l'écrit.
Je me fous complètement sur le titre à choisir. Le vôtre est très bien. En fait, je 'en fous même complètement, du titre.
Mais je le répète : nulle part vous verrez qui que ce soit modifier un texte dont il n'est pas l'auteur.
Nous avons entre 200 et 300 nouvelles discussions ouvertes tous les jours, donc on fait au plus simple et au plus rapide. On essaie avant tout d'être pragmatique et on évite au passage les grands débats stériles du style "je m'en fout complètement, mais je suis contre" (où est la logique ?) qui s'éternisent et ne débouchent généralement sur rien.
Et de toute façon, comme vous dites, vu que vous n'avez rien à faire des titres (un manque de respect des futurs lecteurs peut-être ?) il faut bien que quelqu'un fasse le boulot à votre place...
Vous vous contredites d'un bout à l'autre, c'est complètement décousu...
Et non seulement vous déformez le sens de ce que je dis, mais vous me prêtez carrément des propos que je n'ai jamais écrits.
On repassera pour le pragmatisme et le respect des lecteurs.
"on évite au passage les grands débats stériles (...) qui s'éternisent et ne débouchent généralement sur rien".
Sur ce point, je suis d'accord. Dont acte, me concernant.
Sujet clos pour moi.
Royal Air Maroc a la ferme intention de reprendre à son compte les vols supprimés par les compagnies low-cost en raison de la nouvelle taxe marocaine sur les billets d'avion :
Pas de détail sur les horaires ou les prix des vols supplémentaires (...) mais la RAM explique « avoir comme objectif primordial d’assurer la même capacité habituelle de transport » à Tanger et Fès. Son communiqué du 13 janvier 2014 annonce le renforcement de l’offre à partir d’avril « pour que le service ne soit pas affecté », et précise que la date est celle « à compter de laquelle ces compagnies aériennes étrangères comptent mettre à exécution la suspension de ces lignes et qui coïncide avec l’entrée en vigueur de la taxe aérienne ». Comprendre easyJet mais aussi Ryanair, même si cette dernière n’a toujours officialisé son départ du Maroc tel qu’annoncé par certains médias.
On peut toujours espérer que la RAM conservera non seulement les liaisons jusqu'ici assurées par les low-cost, mais aussi les prix demandés par ceux-ci ... 😉
Vaste débat !
Les autorités marocaines annoncent que cette taxe de 100 dirhams va servir à la promotion touristique.
Je ne suis pas certain que la stratégie qui consiste à taxer ses futurs (et éventuels) clients soit une solution.
Et comme le disait Lacalo, cette somme de 9 euros représente tout de même un % non négligeable dans le prix du billet.
N'oublions pas que le marché du tourisme est un marché ultra-concurrentiel !
EasyJet était en perte de vitesse, et se sert de ce prétexte pour essayer de négocier quelque chose au lieu de simplement se retirer.
Sur un billet aller-retour Paris Marrakech la semaine prochaine avec un bagage en soute, cette somme représente entre 1 et 2,8% du billet, et moins que ce qui sera payé dans l'avion pour consommer une boisson et un sandwich infâme.
Je trouve ça négligeable....
Le principe même de la taxe touristique, c'est de taxer les clients, quand ils le sont (pas futurs ou éventuels).
Vous même, vous taxerez plus vos futurs clients sur un séjour d'une semaine, que la taxe de 100 dirhams.
lol ! quel est le montant des taxes en Europe et le reste du monde ??? faites une différence ! entre nous c'est peut etre pour promouvoir le tourisme ! mais les taxes chez nous elle servent à quoi , a part remplir les caisses de Bercy !
Aller trouver en Europe et en France des billets d'avion à 50 euros !! même low cost ? AU MAROC pour 150 euros environ ?J'ai un aller retour Marrakech - Nantes ! Et avec mon chien 220 euros + Location de véhicule dans Super Marché 350 euros 8 jours Total diesel compris 600 euros Je suis logé, blanchi, nourri chez mes enfants et la famille en général ! Par route diesel, hôtel, péage, nourriture, fatigue du à la conduite traversée de L’Espagne bref environ 2 jours et demi pour aller à Nantes ! Tout cela pour dire que la taxe , en arrêtant de fumée lol !! est acceptable sur tout ce que nous voyons ailleurs Moi je pense avec humour bien sur que d'aller 8 jours sur la Cotes d'Azur vous ne payerez aucune taxe mdrrrr ! Ne prenez pas ce message belligérant ok ! Car vaut mieux attendre la suite ! A quand la taxe ecologique ?? MDR !!
Hi there,
I’m planning a winter trip across India. Departing in early December and returning to France in mid-April.
My main concern is finding an airline that offers this round-trip with the fewest hassles regarding cancellations or flight schedule changes. The unstable geopolitical situation in the Middle East isn’t making this search any easier—recent reviews online about airlines from Gulf states describe quite a few struggles over the past few months.
The direct Paris-Delhi round-trip flights offered by Air France or Air India are probably the safest options, but not the cheapest!
Given this uncertainty, I’m still holding off on finalizing my ticket purchase... Maybe some of you India lovers on VoyageForum have tips or experiences to share?
Thanks, and happy travels to all.
Hi everyone,
Next January, I’m heading to India.
My outbound flight is with Emirates from Paris to Dubai, then another Emirates flight from Dubai to Calcutta.
Could anyone tell me how the connection works? I’ve heard there’s a dedicated Emirates zone, but how does it actually work in practice—I’ve got a 2-hour layover.
Thanks so much!
Take care.
Hi everyone,
I’m heading to Madagascar in early October to cycle from Tana to Diego along the east coast.
I really want to visit the Masoala Peninsula and its primary forest. If anyone’s interested, I’m open to company.
Maybe see you soon!
Hi,
I’m thinking of heading to Malaysia soon.
I’ve seen some great prices and direct flights from Paris with Malaysia Airlines.
Is it a reliable airline?
Thanks for your feedback!
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August.
My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Hi there,
We had planned a trip to Sicily in August, and due to the volcanic eruption of Mount Etna, my flight was canceled. The airline is refunding the outbound flight, but none of the non-refundable expenses: accommodation booked through Booking, rental car, and the return flight aren’t covered. My SUPER Gold card doesn’t work in this specific case! :( If anyone has been in this situation, could you let me know if you were able to get any recourse and, if so, how?
Thanks in advance
I’ve been traveling regularly for over twenty years,
but this is the first time an airline has treated me as poorly as Air France.
Two trips, two problems. The latest:
Trip from Seoul to Rennes. Last leg from Paris CDG to Rennes with Air France.
I arrive in Paris and go straight to Air France to get my boarding pass to Rennes. They assure me my baggage is continuing to Rennes.
Arriving in Rennes, no baggage—same as five other people.
The Air France office is closed, and the airport staff tell me there’s rarely anyone there.
With the help of the airport staff, I file a claim online, and my baggage is almost immediately located. As a result, I’m told I’ll have it the next day.
Four days later, the baggage is still in the same place at CDG—nothing’s moving.
The problem is Air France has no customer service. What they call customer service is a department that takes an hour to answer and just repeats what’s on the online form. No coordination, no way to get things moving. I guess Air France would rather pay the compensation after 21 days than actually do something.
I’ve had lost baggage on other trips, but this is the first time I’ve seen such indifference and lack of professionalism.
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi,
I booked an Etihad ticket on their website for Dusseldorf-Abu Dhabi. In the first name field, I entered all my first names (something I never do and I regret it, but the site was confusing). Everything is spelled correctly, but the problem is that I just received my new passport and only my first two first names and the first letter of the third appear—there’s no trace of the last one.
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in.
Thanks for your feedback!
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon.
I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport.
Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…).
AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly.
On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double!
In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others?
Given the price difference, I’m hesitant…
Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go?
Thanks,
HERVE
Hi everyone, I’ve unfortunately only just noticed that I booked two flight tickets, but I made a mistake on the second first name. Basically, my computer auto-filled and typed my first name twice, so both tickets are in my first name. Only the last names—mine and my friend’s—are correct.
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common).
I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows:
- Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes;
- A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late;
- Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens);
- Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight;
- If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation;
- The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason;
- In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/
Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed.
- Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps.
- Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation.
- If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/
- If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed.
- The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt.
- Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont.
- Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia.
Sincerely,
Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding.
Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage...
Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket.
On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata
On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto
I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer.
Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine.
I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket?
(It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania.
The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines.
So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers.
Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this.
Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops.
Do any of you have updates?
Thanks!
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG.
Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover?
We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker).
We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA.
For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai.
Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)?
We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one).
The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much!
I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul?
I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric