Hi there,
I’m planning a winter trip across India. Departing in early December and returning to France in mid-April.
My main concern is finding an airline that offers this round-trip with the fewest hassles regarding cancellations or flight schedule changes. The unstable geopolitical situation in the Middle East isn’t making this search any easier—recent reviews online about airlines from Gulf states describe quite a few struggles over the past few months.
The direct Paris-Delhi round-trip flights offered by Air France or Air India are probably the safest options, but not the cheapest!
Given this uncertainty, I’m still holding off on finalizing my ticket purchase... Maybe some of you India lovers on VoyageForum have tips or experiences to share?
Thanks, and happy travels to all.
Toutes les compagnies aériennes philippines mises sous liste noire de l'Union européenne
by Alexp79
This discussion is in French, the community’s main language.
merci Christian!!
Toujours précis et documenté!
En direct de manila :robinson place!
dans quelques heures entre Toulouse et manille via Hk and London!
Eh oui !le retour aprés 7 semaines...so sad
Amitiés à toi ;Boholano tooo sans oublier bien sur bantayan😉
nav sur le départ!
ça y est tu rentres? bon retour au pays et bientôt les photos😉
Lorsque tu ne sais pas où tu vas, regarde d'où tu viens (proverbe Africain)
Ni aujourd'hui ni jamais, la richesse ne suffit à classer un homme, mais aujourd'hui plus que jamais la pauvreté le déclasse (Charles Maurras)
Ni aujourd'hui ni jamais, la richesse ne suffit à classer un homme, mais aujourd'hui plus que jamais la pauvreté le déclasse (Charles Maurras)
Je vais de rentrer des philippines, je ne sais pas si les pilotes sont comme vous dites de "bons pilotes" et bien formés mais en tout cas nous avons pris pour 2 vols domestiques Cébu Pacific Air et j'ai le regret de vous dire que les atterrisages c'est vraiment pas ce qu'ils savent faire de mieux ... par deux fois, cela a été je dirais : très, trop sportif !!! voire le danger à chaque fois de trop près ...
Bonjour,
Vous savez, le ressenti du passager ne dit pas grand chose de la sécurité ou de la qualité d'un atterrissage.
Michel
Vous savez, le ressenti du passager ne dit pas grand chose de la sécurité ou de la qualité d'un atterrissage.
Michel
TROP PRET DE QUOI????....
es tu mort?
trés subjectif!!!!!!........les pistes aux philippines ne sont pas d'un roulant exceptionnel
mais j ai toujours ressenti sur une vingtaine d'atterissages un bon feeling comparable a ce que l 'on peut trouver en europe!!
pas plus pas moins!
tout épend des conditions de ventet de météo à l'atterissage.
je conseille toujours cebu pacific, c'est une compagnie sérieuse!!
lDe bons atterissages et de bons pilotes.
persiste et signe.
Merci Alex!
Bien atterit par Cathay Pacific et British airways depuis 11H ce matin/
Amitiés😉
Nav
Au contraire, je les trouve très pro; mais bon c'est du ressenti; chacun le sien.🙂
Lorsque tu ne sais pas où tu vas, regarde d'où tu viens (proverbe Africain)
Ni aujourd'hui ni jamais, la richesse ne suffit à classer un homme, mais aujourd'hui plus que jamais la pauvreté le déclasse (Charles Maurras)
Ni aujourd'hui ni jamais, la richesse ne suffit à classer un homme, mais aujourd'hui plus que jamais la pauvreté le déclasse (Charles Maurras)
Bon retour au pays alors😉
Lorsque tu ne sais pas où tu vas, regarde d'où tu viens (proverbe Africain)
Ni aujourd'hui ni jamais, la richesse ne suffit à classer un homme, mais aujourd'hui plus que jamais la pauvreté le déclasse (Charles Maurras)
Ni aujourd'hui ni jamais, la richesse ne suffit à classer un homme, mais aujourd'hui plus que jamais la pauvreté le déclasse (Charles Maurras)
bonjour ; il y a peu de temps nous avons eu l'occasion de voyager en airbus avec la cebu; bien evidemment rien à dire.
avoir une opinion sur le contexte et surtout les moyens qu'on eu ou mis en place les phillipines pour la sécurité, c'est pas évident
mais je vous invite à taper comme recherche ceci:
mission d'assistance aus autorités de l'aviation civile phillippine
je trouve que les christian font dans le renseignement, c'est super!!! bon vent à tous!! christ
je trouve que les christian font dans le renseignement, c'est super!!! bon vent à tous!! christ
Merci Christian pour cette info. Le rapport date de novembre 2008, Je met le lien ici:
Réalisé à la demande d'Airbus Industrie, le présent rapport intervient dans le cadre de l'accord d'assistance d'Airbus Industrie aux autorités de l'aviation civile philippines suite à leur « déclassement » en classe II par la FAA. Il expose le déroulement de la mission, les éléments de contexte, les principaux points abordés en réunions et les premières réflexions sur l'évolution de la nouvelle autorité philippine, la Civil aviation authority of philippines, la CAAP. Sur le contexte, il relève notamment que, malgré la crise, le transport aérien est aujourd'hui florissant et que les constructeurs aéronautiques sont intéressés par le potentiel de croissance local. Le plan institutionnel, est quant à lui marqué par le remplacement de l'ancienne administration civile, l'ATO, par la nouvelle structure, la CAAP, dotée de pouvoirs nouveaux et importants. En conclusion, le rapport met en évidence la volonté de changement et recommande de donner du temps aux responsables pour mettre en place la nouvelle organisation et rendre les progrès perceptibles, ce que ne permettra pas le prochain audit de l'OACI prévu en octobre 2009.
Ce qui est intéressant, c'est que Airbus Industrie croit au potenciel de développement et envisage de vendre des A380 à Philippines Airlines. Que l'audit de l'OACI en octobre 2009 était attendu, et que l'issue était aussi prévisible. Cela confirme aussi que la responsabilité du déclassement aux USA et ensuite la liste noire en Europe incombe totalement aux autorités et non pas aux compagnies aériennes. Que le départ en retraite quelques semaines avant du DG de la CAAP sonne comme une sanction.
Maintenant, il faut croire à la capacité des autorités à relever le défi et comme dit dans le rapport "leur donner le temps".
MABUHAY !
Réalisé à la demande d'Airbus Industrie, le présent rapport intervient dans le cadre de l'accord d'assistance d'Airbus Industrie aux autorités de l'aviation civile philippines suite à leur « déclassement » en classe II par la FAA. Il expose le déroulement de la mission, les éléments de contexte, les principaux points abordés en réunions et les premières réflexions sur l'évolution de la nouvelle autorité philippine, la Civil aviation authority of philippines, la CAAP. Sur le contexte, il relève notamment que, malgré la crise, le transport aérien est aujourd'hui florissant et que les constructeurs aéronautiques sont intéressés par le potentiel de croissance local. Le plan institutionnel, est quant à lui marqué par le remplacement de l'ancienne administration civile, l'ATO, par la nouvelle structure, la CAAP, dotée de pouvoirs nouveaux et importants. En conclusion, le rapport met en évidence la volonté de changement et recommande de donner du temps aux responsables pour mettre en place la nouvelle organisation et rendre les progrès perceptibles, ce que ne permettra pas le prochain audit de l'OACI prévu en octobre 2009.
Ce qui est intéressant, c'est que Airbus Industrie croit au potenciel de développement et envisage de vendre des A380 à Philippines Airlines. Que l'audit de l'OACI en octobre 2009 était attendu, et que l'issue était aussi prévisible. Cela confirme aussi que la responsabilité du déclassement aux USA et ensuite la liste noire en Europe incombe totalement aux autorités et non pas aux compagnies aériennes. Que le départ en retraite quelques semaines avant du DG de la CAAP sonne comme une sanction.
Maintenant, il faut croire à la capacité des autorités à relever le défi et comme dit dans le rapport "leur donner le temps".
MABUHAY !
😏 J'ai pris une dizaine de fois Cebu Pacific, jamais un retard, les avions sont neufs et le personnel compétent...
Faut pas exagérer non plus Cebu Pacific a certes des avions neufs mais se traine aussi ici aux Philippines une sacrée réputation d'incompétence et de retards en série, sans compter les pertes de baggages ...
Un petit extrait de ce qu'en pensent les filipinos: http://www.jehzlau-concepts.com/2009/04/cebu-pacific-the-cheapest-and-most-unsecured-airline-company.html
et des airbus qui plus est
c'est pas une référence , ils ont eu pas mal de problèmes les airbus ces dernières années.....et des tout récents
c'est pas une référence , ils ont eu pas mal de problèmes les airbus ces dernières années.....et des tout récents
Les AIRBUS ...... pas fiables??
Parmi les avions les plus fiable au monde!!
Il Faut arreter......les derniers problemes connus ne concernent pas à priori des défauts de sureté sur les appareils.
Conditions athmosphériques?
probleme de sonde?
multiplications de plusieurs circonstances...la malchance.
une erreur d(appréciation du commandant de bord sur les conditions athmosphérique?
Pas de réponse pour l instant!!
mais aucun AIRBUS A 330/340 n a été pris en défaut
Combien de A 319/320 additionnent les miles chaque jour??
Arretons la calomnie.
AIRBUS est une référence de sureté
merci
oh ça va arrêter votre cinoche là et de monter en mayonnaise un avis parmi tant d'autre
chacun son opinion
airbus n'est pas le pire mais n'est pas le meilleur non plus,
ils ont comme autres appareils eu des pépins , hélas bon l'année dernière il ya eu une série noire pour eux
et parfois c'est des boeing
au début des A320 il yavait pas mal de problèmes quand même ...... au fur et à mesure ils ont été réglés....
et de parler de calomnie arrêter de monter sur vos grands chevaux à croire que vous êtes le "cerveau" d'airbus...
airbus n'est pas le pire mais n'est pas le meilleur non plus,
ils ont comme autres appareils eu des pépins , hélas bon l'année dernière il ya eu une série noire pour eux
et parfois c'est des boeing
au début des A320 il yavait pas mal de problèmes quand même ...... au fur et à mesure ils ont été réglés....
et de parler de calomnie arrêter de monter sur vos grands chevaux à croire que vous êtes le "cerveau" d'airbus...
hélas bon l'année dernière il ya eu une série noire pour eux
Un tail strike suite à erreur de l'équipage, et 2 crashs dont on ne connaît toujours pas les causes, sur plus de 5800 appareils en activité, une "série noire" ?
Un tail strike suite à erreur de l'équipage, et 2 crashs dont on ne connaît toujours pas les causes, sur plus de 5800 appareils en activité, une "série noire" ?
Contributions CC BY-SA
Je met en ligne ici, l'article du Manila Standard Today du 12 avril 2010. : Booking cancellations
Traduction:
Le Département du Tourisme a tout lieu d'être inquiet par le nombre d'annulations des Tours Opérateurs Européens. Les touristes européens sont récemment arrivés aux Philippines, en nombre croissant, après que Manille a commencé la promotion des plages et autres destinations touristiques. Les retraités européens, aussi, ont trouvé aux Philippines un havre de paix comme alternative, où ils pourraient passer leurs vieux jours.
Les annulations devraient inciter le gouvernement à traiter le problème des normes de l'aviation civile en urgence. La liste noire des transporteurs philippins, est injuste car les compagnies volant dans et hors du pays, ont pour la plupart des avions fabriqués en Europe, là où les règles de sécurité les plus sévères sont présumé observées.
Mais l'Union Européenne trouvant de «graves manquements à la sécurité" dans la réglementation des transports aériens a fait des dégâts après que le groupement des T.O. a conseillé leurs clients d'éviter de voyager dans ce pays.
Le Secrétaire au Tourisme, Joseph Ace Durano a mis en garde sur les effets de cette mise au ban des compagnies aériennes philippines "Les arrivées européennes représentent un pourcentage important de notre cible dans le premier trimestre."
"Plus nous restons longtemps dans cette liste noire, plus il sera difficile de se remettre de ces pertes importantes», a dit Durano.
L'action de l'UE a déjà conduit à l'annulation de réservations de voyages de groupe d'avril à août.
Les T.O. sont en attente de changements de statut en ce qui concerne la liste noire de l’U.E.
L'interdiction a également incité les compagnies d'assurance en Europe à supprimer la couverture assurance sur les packages incluant des vols intérieurs.
Les T.O. locaux, à leur tour, ont dû annuler des réservations sur des prestations et services touristiques locaux au vue de la difficulté de vendre des packages, y compris les vols inter-îles.
Le tourisme est aujourd'hui un revenu important pour l’économie du pays, ainsi que les revenus des travailleurs expatriés, et les contrats de sous-traitance gagnés sur l'externalisation des processus métier de l'industrie.
Le secteur touristique crée des emplois directs, surtout dans les provinces.
Les Autorités seraient irresponsables si elles ne prenaient pas d’actions au plus vite pour retirer les Philippines de la liste noire Européenne.
Le Département du Tourisme a tout lieu d'être inquiet par le nombre d'annulations des Tours Opérateurs Européens. Les touristes européens sont récemment arrivés aux Philippines, en nombre croissant, après que Manille a commencé la promotion des plages et autres destinations touristiques. Les retraités européens, aussi, ont trouvé aux Philippines un havre de paix comme alternative, où ils pourraient passer leurs vieux jours.
Les annulations devraient inciter le gouvernement à traiter le problème des normes de l'aviation civile en urgence. La liste noire des transporteurs philippins, est injuste car les compagnies volant dans et hors du pays, ont pour la plupart des avions fabriqués en Europe, là où les règles de sécurité les plus sévères sont présumé observées.
Mais l'Union Européenne trouvant de «graves manquements à la sécurité" dans la réglementation des transports aériens a fait des dégâts après que le groupement des T.O. a conseillé leurs clients d'éviter de voyager dans ce pays.
Le Secrétaire au Tourisme, Joseph Ace Durano a mis en garde sur les effets de cette mise au ban des compagnies aériennes philippines "Les arrivées européennes représentent un pourcentage important de notre cible dans le premier trimestre."
"Plus nous restons longtemps dans cette liste noire, plus il sera difficile de se remettre de ces pertes importantes», a dit Durano.
L'action de l'UE a déjà conduit à l'annulation de réservations de voyages de groupe d'avril à août.
Les T.O. sont en attente de changements de statut en ce qui concerne la liste noire de l’U.E.
L'interdiction a également incité les compagnies d'assurance en Europe à supprimer la couverture assurance sur les packages incluant des vols intérieurs.
Les T.O. locaux, à leur tour, ont dû annuler des réservations sur des prestations et services touristiques locaux au vue de la difficulté de vendre des packages, y compris les vols inter-îles.
Le tourisme est aujourd'hui un revenu important pour l’économie du pays, ainsi que les revenus des travailleurs expatriés, et les contrats de sous-traitance gagnés sur l'externalisation des processus métier de l'industrie.
Le secteur touristique crée des emplois directs, surtout dans les provinces.
Les Autorités seraient irresponsables si elles ne prenaient pas d’actions au plus vite pour retirer les Philippines de la liste noire Européenne.
Bonjour
J'ai ouvert un nouveau post, mais les modos ne m'autorise pas à le mettre dans la rubrique "Philippines"... je ne sais pas pourquoi : http://voyageforum.com/v.f?post=3363823:
Ils ne sont franchement pas rancuniers...: Bravo !
Cebu Pacific (CEB), compagnie des Philippines, a passé une commande ferme avec Airbus, portant sur sept A320 supplémentaires. Avec ce tout dernier contrat, le carnet de commandes du transporteur pour la famille A320 d'Airbus (EADS) s'élève à 22 appareils, livrables entre le dernier trimestre 2010 et 2014. Ces nouveaux appareils, équipés de réacteurs CFM 56, viendront rejoindre une flotte existante de monocouloirs Airbus, exploitée sur le réseau étendu de lignes intérieures et régionales de la compagnie low cost.
"Les appareils de la famille A320 sont inégalés en raison de leurs faibles coûts d'exploitation, leurs temps d'escale rapides et leur grand confort passagers", a déclaré Lance Gokongwei, Président et CEO de Cebu Pacific. "Ces caractéristiques nous permettent d'offrir à nos passagers un produit compétitif d'excellente qualité, avec lequel nous desservirons davantage de destinations et de marchés dans la région, au fur et à mesure de la croissance de notre flotte".
"Nous sommes très heureux que les appareils de la famille A320 aient joué un rôle dans la réussite et la compétitivité de Cebu Pacific", a pour sa part ajouté John Leahy, Chief Operating Officer Customers d'Airbus. "Avec cette nouvelle commande, la compagnie sera en bonne place pour poursuivre son expansion, grâce au monocouloir le plus avancé et le plus rentable du marché".
Cebu Pacific, basé à Manille, exploite actuellement 21 appareils de la famille A320, qui confèrent à sa flotte une moyenne d'âge de 2,8 ans seulement. La compagnie dessert aujourd'hui 33 destinations intérieures et 14 villes en Asie.
Ils ne sont franchement pas rancuniers...: Bravo !
Cebu Pacific (CEB), compagnie des Philippines, a passé une commande ferme avec Airbus, portant sur sept A320 supplémentaires. Avec ce tout dernier contrat, le carnet de commandes du transporteur pour la famille A320 d'Airbus (EADS) s'élève à 22 appareils, livrables entre le dernier trimestre 2010 et 2014. Ces nouveaux appareils, équipés de réacteurs CFM 56, viendront rejoindre une flotte existante de monocouloirs Airbus, exploitée sur le réseau étendu de lignes intérieures et régionales de la compagnie low cost.
"Les appareils de la famille A320 sont inégalés en raison de leurs faibles coûts d'exploitation, leurs temps d'escale rapides et leur grand confort passagers", a déclaré Lance Gokongwei, Président et CEO de Cebu Pacific. "Ces caractéristiques nous permettent d'offrir à nos passagers un produit compétitif d'excellente qualité, avec lequel nous desservirons davantage de destinations et de marchés dans la région, au fur et à mesure de la croissance de notre flotte".
"Nous sommes très heureux que les appareils de la famille A320 aient joué un rôle dans la réussite et la compétitivité de Cebu Pacific", a pour sa part ajouté John Leahy, Chief Operating Officer Customers d'Airbus. "Avec cette nouvelle commande, la compagnie sera en bonne place pour poursuivre son expansion, grâce au monocouloir le plus avancé et le plus rentable du marché".
Cebu Pacific, basé à Manille, exploite actuellement 21 appareils de la famille A320, qui confèrent à sa flotte une moyenne d'âge de 2,8 ans seulement. La compagnie dessert aujourd'hui 33 destinations intérieures et 14 villes en Asie.
J'ai lu un article, peu avant l'éruption du volcan, relatant l'atterrissage après presque 20 mn de vol sans moteur d'un avion Philippin. Les pilotes auraient été accueillis en héros.
En lisant plus loin, on s'aperçoit que le premier moteur est tombé en panne peu après le décollage, mais (je cite l'article) "un boeing pouvant voler sur un seul moteur, les pilotes ont poursuivit le vol. Peu avant l'arrivée, le deuxième moteur est tombé en panne."
J'ai relu deux fois. Je pensais que lorsqu'un moteur tombe en panne, on devait atterrir au plus vite.
Si c'est les consignes de la compagnie pour éviter les frais de déroutement, je comprends alors la liste noire !
Ton logo est super beau.
Privé de son cadre habituel, dépouillé de ses habitudes comme d'un volumineux emballage, le voyageur se trouve ramené à de plus humbles proportions. Plus ouvert aussi à la curiosité, à l'intuition, au coup de foudre.
Nicolas Bouvier
J'ai lu un article, peu avant l'éruption du volcan, relatant l'atterrissage après presque 20 mn de vol sans moteur d'un avion Philippin. Les pilotes auraient été accueillis en héros.
En lisant plus loin, on s'aperçoit que le premier moteur est tombé en panne peu après le décollage, mais (je cite l'article) "un boeing pouvant voler sur un seul moteur, les pilotes ont poursuivit le vol. Peu avant l'arrivée, le deuxième moteur est tombé en panne."
J'ai relu deux fois. Je pensais que lorsqu'un moteur tombe en panne, on devait atterrir au plus vite.
Si c'est les consignes de la compagnie pour éviter les frais de déroutement, je comprends alors la liste noire !
Il faut voir combien de temps devait durer le vol ? Si le vol était programmé pour 45 minutes, détourner l'avion aurait peut-être était plus long (histoire d'organiser un atterrissage d'urgence, obtenir les autorisations nécessaires, obtenir un couloir de vol et détourner les autres avions).
De toutes façons, il ne faut pas oublier que l'avion, c'est mal et dangereux. Quand on monte dans un avion, on a autant de chance d'avoir un accident que quand on monte sur un scooter (statistique par nombre de vols et non par km parcouru), le seul avantage pour l'avion c'est que quand on prend l'avion, on n'a pas d'autres choix 😕
Il faut voir combien de temps devait durer le vol ? Si le vol était programmé pour 45 minutes, détourner l'avion aurait peut-être était plus long (histoire d'organiser un atterrissage d'urgence, obtenir les autorisations nécessaires, obtenir un couloir de vol et détourner les autres avions).
De toutes façons, il ne faut pas oublier que l'avion, c'est mal et dangereux. Quand on monte dans un avion, on a autant de chance d'avoir un accident que quand on monte sur un scooter (statistique par nombre de vols et non par km parcouru), le seul avantage pour l'avion c'est que quand on prend l'avion, on n'a pas d'autres choix 😕
Quand on monte dans un avion, on a autant de chance d'avoir un accident que quand on monte sur un scooter (statistique par nombre de vols et non par km parcouru)
Eh beh, je veux faire du scooter avec toi 😄 (ou ne pas prendre les avions que tu prends...)
le seul avantage pour l'avion c'est que quand on prend l'avion, on n'a pas d'autres choix 😕
Ah ?
Eh beh, je veux faire du scooter avec toi 😄 (ou ne pas prendre les avions que tu prends...)
le seul avantage pour l'avion c'est que quand on prend l'avion, on n'a pas d'autres choix 😕
Ah ?
Contributions CC BY-SA
Je suppose que cet avion n'avait que 2 moteurs. Si un des moteurs s’arrête après le point de non retour, le décollage se poursuit. L’avion monte dans l’axe de piste, puis fait un tour et revient atterrir en priorité. Dans le cas présent, l'avion devait déjà être a son niveau de croisière.
Les Boeing (comme les Airbus) peuvent voler avec un moteur sur 2, voire même pour les 747 un moteur sur 4. Il suffit de compenser par les ailerons. Ainsi, l'avion peut continuer à voler pendant des heures. Dans le cadre de sa certification, le Boeing 777ER vola pendant 6 heures et 29 minutes au dessus de l’océan sur un seul réacteur.
Un avion de ligne dont tous les moteurs sont en panne peut planer avec une finesse de 30. Si tous les moteurs lachent à l'altitude de croisière (10 km), cet avion pourra donc parcourir 300 kms pour tenter de rejoindre l'aéroport le plus proche.
Mais comme tu l'indiques " peu avant l'arrivée le deuxième moteur est tombé en panne." Donc la solution la plus sécuritaire a été d'atterrir sur l'aéroport le plus proche et ca devait être celui de destination.
Les pilotes ont suivi les procédures et contrairement à ce que tu pensais, ce n'est pas lorsqu'un moteur tombe en panne qu'il faut atterrir au plus vite, (sauf en phase décollage) mais quand il n'y a plus de moteur du tout ..! Dans le cas présent il a volé 20 minutes en planant, il aurait pu encore voler beaucoup plus. Cordialement
Un avion de ligne dont tous les moteurs sont en panne peut planer avec une finesse de 30. Si tous les moteurs lachent à l'altitude de croisière (10 km), cet avion pourra donc parcourir 300 kms pour tenter de rejoindre l'aéroport le plus proche.
Mais comme tu l'indiques " peu avant l'arrivée le deuxième moteur est tombé en panne." Donc la solution la plus sécuritaire a été d'atterrir sur l'aéroport le plus proche et ca devait être celui de destination.
Les pilotes ont suivi les procédures et contrairement à ce que tu pensais, ce n'est pas lorsqu'un moteur tombe en panne qu'il faut atterrir au plus vite, (sauf en phase décollage) mais quand il n'y a plus de moteur du tout ..! Dans le cas présent il a volé 20 minutes en planant, il aurait pu encore voler beaucoup plus. Cordialement
Il suffit de compenser par les ailerons.
Mais cela nécessite également de voler plus bas.
Mais cela nécessite également de voler plus bas.
Contributions CC BY-SA
D"accord avec toi et ce n "est pas la premiere fois qu"un avion , je crois avoir lu aussi une aventure a ce sujet sur Airbus, se posant sans moteur!!
bravo les pilotes et les ingénieurs qui concoivent des avions aussi fins!
Nav
Bonjour Régis,
Après une recherche approfondie, j'ai trouvé le seul incident se rapprochant peu ou prou de ton récit. Ca c'est passé le 13 avril 2010. (juste avant l'explosion du volcan)
Problèmes:ce n'est pas aux Philippines, mais à Hong Kong ...!ce n'est pas une compagnie Philippines, mais CATHAY PACIFIC compagnie chinoise de Hong Kong vol CX780ce n'est pas un Boeing, mais un Airbus 330finalement on apprend que les 2 moteurs n'étaient pas coupés...!Voir les détails ici...........L'article sur le forum "crash-aerien.aero" ici............et ici
Mais est-ce bien le même incident ?. Ou as tu plus de détails à donner ?
Après une recherche approfondie, j'ai trouvé le seul incident se rapprochant peu ou prou de ton récit. Ca c'est passé le 13 avril 2010. (juste avant l'explosion du volcan)
Problèmes:ce n'est pas aux Philippines, mais à Hong Kong ...!ce n'est pas une compagnie Philippines, mais CATHAY PACIFIC compagnie chinoise de Hong Kong vol CX780ce n'est pas un Boeing, mais un Airbus 330finalement on apprend que les 2 moteurs n'étaient pas coupés...!Voir les détails ici...........L'article sur le forum "crash-aerien.aero" ici............et ici
Mais est-ce bien le même incident ?. Ou as tu plus de détails à donner ?
..., ce n'est pas lorsqu'un moteur tombe en panne qu'il faut atterrir au plus vite, (sauf en phase décollage) mais quand il n'y a plus de moteur du tout ..!
Je corrige ma citation avant que cela ne soit mal interprété: La perte d'un moteur est un événement majeur; dans le jargon des pilotes cela s'appelle un IFSD ( In-flight shut down ). Tous les avions a 2 moteurs doivent être certifié ETOPS180 ce qui signifie que qu'à tout moment, en cas d'incident sur un des 2 moteurs, l'avion ne doit pas être à plus de 180 minutes d'un aéroport de détournement. Après ce sont les pilotes qui jugent .... mais l'avion peut voler avec un seul moteur...sans moteur c'est sur, c'est plus difficile....!😕
Je corrige ma citation avant que cela ne soit mal interprété: La perte d'un moteur est un événement majeur; dans le jargon des pilotes cela s'appelle un IFSD ( In-flight shut down ). Tous les avions a 2 moteurs doivent être certifié ETOPS180 ce qui signifie que qu'à tout moment, en cas d'incident sur un des 2 moteurs, l'avion ne doit pas être à plus de 180 minutes d'un aéroport de détournement. Après ce sont les pilotes qui jugent .... mais l'avion peut voler avec un seul moteur...sans moteur c'est sur, c'est plus difficile....!😕
Tous les avions a 2 moteurs doivent être certifié ETOPS180
Non, la certification ETOPS n'a rien d'obligatoire. Certaines compagnies ont même des appareils d'un même modèle dont certains sont ETOPS et d'autres non, suivant les besoins.
Après ce sont les pilotes qui jugent
Non plus, lorsqu'un des deux moteurs est en panne, on ne continue pas comme si de rien n'était, on se pose au plus vite.
Non, la certification ETOPS n'a rien d'obligatoire. Certaines compagnies ont même des appareils d'un même modèle dont certains sont ETOPS et d'autres non, suivant les besoins.
Après ce sont les pilotes qui jugent
Non plus, lorsqu'un des deux moteurs est en panne, on ne continue pas comme si de rien n'était, on se pose au plus vite.
Contributions CC BY-SA
il a voulu dire que Cebu Pacific exploitaient des Airbus A 320 et des AIRBUS A 330 en
style sténo ou cellphone des A 320-300!
Faut arreter de couper les poils de c en deux😉
Nav
Log in first, then come back to this page.
You might also like
Carnet de voyage Siargao/Cebu aux PhilippinesFR
Trip report: Coron and Palawan in the Philippines
Adventures of a Bygone Era: The Philippines in 1984
Du nord au sud de l'archipel philippinFR
Choisir entre l'Indonésie, les Philippines et le Sri LankaFR
Les Philippines en familleFR
Questions sur le tourisme aux PhilippinesFR
More discussions
Hi everyone,
I’m heading to Madagascar in early October to cycle from Tana to Diego along the east coast.
I really want to visit the Masoala Peninsula and its primary forest. If anyone’s interested, I’m open to company.
Maybe see you soon!
Hi,
I’m thinking of heading to Malaysia soon.
I’ve seen some great prices and direct flights from Paris with Malaysia Airlines.
Is it a reliable airline?
Thanks for your feedback!
Hello,
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August. My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August. My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Hi there,
We had planned a trip to Sicily in August, and due to the volcanic eruption of Mount Etna, my flight was canceled. The airline is refunding the outbound flight, but none of the non-refundable expenses: accommodation booked through Booking, rental car, and the return flight aren’t covered. My SUPER Gold card doesn’t work in this specific case! :( If anyone has been in this situation, could you let me know if you were able to get any recourse and, if so, how?
Thanks in advance
I’ve been traveling regularly for over twenty years,
but this is the first time an airline has treated me as poorly as Air France.
Two trips, two problems. The latest:
Trip from Seoul to Rennes. Last leg from Paris CDG to Rennes with Air France.
I arrive in Paris and go straight to Air France to get my boarding pass to Rennes. They assure me my baggage is continuing to Rennes.
Arriving in Rennes, no baggage—same as five other people.
The Air France office is closed, and the airport staff tell me there’s rarely anyone there.
With the help of the airport staff, I file a claim online, and my baggage is almost immediately located. As a result, I’m told I’ll have it the next day.
Four days later, the baggage is still in the same place at CDG—nothing’s moving.
The problem is Air France has no customer service. What they call customer service is a department that takes an hour to answer and just repeats what’s on the online form. No coordination, no way to get things moving. I guess Air France would rather pay the compensation after 21 days than actually do something.
I’ve had lost baggage on other trips, but this is the first time I’ve seen such indifference and lack of professionalism.
but this is the first time an airline has treated me as poorly as Air France.
Two trips, two problems. The latest:
Trip from Seoul to Rennes. Last leg from Paris CDG to Rennes with Air France.
I arrive in Paris and go straight to Air France to get my boarding pass to Rennes. They assure me my baggage is continuing to Rennes.
Arriving in Rennes, no baggage—same as five other people.
The Air France office is closed, and the airport staff tell me there’s rarely anyone there.
With the help of the airport staff, I file a claim online, and my baggage is almost immediately located. As a result, I’m told I’ll have it the next day.
Four days later, the baggage is still in the same place at CDG—nothing’s moving.
The problem is Air France has no customer service. What they call customer service is a department that takes an hour to answer and just repeats what’s on the online form. No coordination, no way to get things moving. I guess Air France would rather pay the compensation after 21 days than actually do something.
I’ve had lost baggage on other trips, but this is the first time I’ve seen such indifference and lack of professionalism.
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi,
I booked an Etihad ticket on their website for Dusseldorf-Abu Dhabi. In the first name field, I entered all my first names (something I never do and I regret it, but the site was confusing). Everything is spelled correctly, but the problem is that I just received my new passport and only my first two first names and the first letter of the third appear—there’s no trace of the last one.
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in. Thanks for your feedback!
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in. Thanks for your feedback!
Hi everyone,
Next January, I’m heading to India.
My outbound flight is with Emirates from Paris to Dubai, then another Emirates flight from Dubai to Calcutta.
Could anyone tell me how the connection works? I’ve heard there’s a dedicated Emirates zone, but how does it actually work in practice—I’ve got a 2-hour layover.
Thanks so much!
Take care.
Hi there,
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon. I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport. Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…). AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly. On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double! In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others? Given the price difference, I’m hesitant… Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go? Thanks, HERVE
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon. I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport. Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…). AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly. On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double! In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others? Given the price difference, I’m hesitant… Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go? Thanks, HERVE
Hi everyone, I’ve unfortunately only just noticed that I booked two flight tickets, but I made a mistake on the second first name. Basically, my computer auto-filled and typed my first name twice, so both tickets are in my first name. Only the last names—mine and my friend’s—are correct.
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common). I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common). I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
Hello,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Hi there,
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
Hi,
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
Hi there,
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
Hi,
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
Hi,
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
Hello,
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
Hello,
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Hi everyone,
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
Hi there!
Has anyone taken the direct flight from CDG to Las Vegas with Air France?
Looking forward to your feedback!
Hey everyone,
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
Hi there,
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric