Tandis que Air Asia achete 10 A330-300: http://www.boursorama.com/infos/actualites/detail_actu_societes.phtml?&symbole=1rPEAD&news=4118395
Virgin va acheter 24 Boeing 787
by Rains091
This discussion is in French, the community’s main language.
Original post
http://www.latribune.fr/info/Virgin-Atlantic-conclut-l-achat-de-24-Boeing-787-~-IDDC3D308C89C57182C12572C7001E7F8D-$Db=Tribune/Articles.nsf
Tandis que Air Asia achete 10 A330-300: http://www.boursorama.com/infos/actualites/detail_actu_societes.phtml?&symbole=1rPEAD&news=4118395
Tandis que Air Asia achete 10 A330-300: http://www.boursorama.com/infos/actualites/detail_actu_societes.phtml?&symbole=1rPEAD&news=4118395
La guerre salit tous ceux qui la font: au fil des mois et des années, j'ai vu les deux bords verser dans le mal, j'ai vu le mal affronté le mal, et le bien, ce qu'il y'a de bon dans l'humain, devenir la victime des deux.
http://www.latribune.fr/info/Virgin-Atlantic-conclut-l-achat-de-24-Boeing-787-~-IDDC3D308C89C57182C12572C7001E7F8D-$Db=Tribune/Articles.nsf
Tandis que Air Asia achete 10 A330-300: http://www.boursorama.com/infos/actualites/detail_actu_societes.phtml?&symbole=1rPEAD&news=4118395
airbus perds un fidèle client dont virgien atlantic peut-être fatiqué des déboires de l'A360 600 ou retard du 380 ?
Tandis que Air Asia achete 10 A330-300: http://www.boursorama.com/infos/actualites/detail_actu_societes.phtml?&symbole=1rPEAD&news=4118395
airbus perds un fidèle client dont virgien atlantic peut-être fatiqué des déboires de l'A360 600 ou retard du 380 ?
la vie c'est un voyage dési la terre nou lé ké passager ouh ouh créole en profite ton liberté
A priori Virgin serait mecontente des A340-600... ce n'est pas la seule Cie dans ce cas visiblement !
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Officialisation de la commande:
15 787 en commande ferme:
http://www.aerospacemedia.com/AFP/preview.asp?xml=070424131852.ztmxjdgy.xml
Et Air Canada vient de levé 23 options sur le 787... Bonne journée pour Boeing aujourd'hui: http://www.aerospacemedia.com/AFP/preview.asp?xml=070424123410.pg1jeb6f.xml
Et Air Canada vient de levé 23 options sur le 787... Bonne journée pour Boeing aujourd'hui: http://www.aerospacemedia.com/AFP/preview.asp?xml=070424123410.pg1jeb6f.xml
La guerre salit tous ceux qui la font: au fil des mois et des années, j'ai vu les deux bords verser dans le mal, j'ai vu le mal affronté le mal, et le bien, ce qu'il y'a de bon dans l'humain, devenir la victime des deux.
Je suis toujours étonné de la visible jubilation de certains d'entre vous à dénigrer airbus!🤪
Je suis confondu devant ce manque de confiance dans les ouvriers et employés de cette extraordinaire entreprise!🙂
Vous savez bien que le marché mondial est surtout régit par l'avantage de la conversion dollar😎
Je suis toujours étonné de la visible jubilation de certains d'entre vous à dénigrer airbus!🤪
Loin de moi de déniger Airbus je dis juste qu'une famille celle du A340 a peu, pour ne pas dire plus, de retour de satisfaction client ! en en l'occurence Virgin serait parmi les clients disons moyennement satisfait de ses A340-600. Il est encore possible de dire (pour les cies) que tout n'est pas bien chez Airbus non ?
Loin de moi de déniger Airbus je dis juste qu'une famille celle du A340 a peu, pour ne pas dire plus, de retour de satisfaction client ! en en l'occurence Virgin serait parmi les clients disons moyennement satisfait de ses A340-600. Il est encore possible de dire (pour les cies) que tout n'est pas bien chez Airbus non ?
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Parce que l'A340 est peu competitif en terme de consommation comparé au concurrent de chez Boeing. Ce qui n'était pas un inconvénient majeur il y a quelques années lorsque le pétrole tournait autour de 35$ l'est beaucoup plus aujourd'hui avec un pétrole à 60-70$.
L'avantage des quadriréacteur s'est peu à peu évaporé au cours des années avec des réacteurs de plus en plus fiables qui permettent aux biréacteurs de voler sur les même trajets que des quadri (ce qui était loin d'être le cas au début des 90's).
L'avantage des quadriréacteur s'est peu à peu évaporé au cours des années avec des réacteurs de plus en plus fiables qui permettent aux biréacteurs de voler sur les même trajets que des quadri (ce qui était loin d'être le cas au début des 90's).
Il est vrai que l'A340-500 et A340-600 tout comme aussi l'A340-300, est pas réellement apprécié par certaines compagnies...
Même si il esyt vrai que ceux ci consomment moins qu'un 744, environ 7 a 10%, ils sont plus gourmands en carburant que ces concurrents directs de chez Boeing, et le fait qu'ils ont 4 moteurs coutent plus cher en maintenance... Le surplus d'exploitation par an s'élève a environ 12-15% pour un A340-600 contre un 777-300ER...
Après, les chiffres qui parlent de plus sont a évité car souvent infondés... En consommation, un A340-600 consomme 7 a 10% de plus qu'un 77W...
Et aujourd'hui, lorsqu'une compagnie a le choix entre ces appareils, elle se tourne bien plus souvent vers le 77W, même si il ne faut pas oublié que le 346 permet aussi d'avoir une flotte rationalisé pr certaines compagnies et donc au final, lorsqu'une compagnie possède déja des 332 et 343, le surplus de cout s'élève a 8-10%...
C'est pourquoi le 77W rencontre un tel succès auprès des compagnies aeriennes, car il n'y a pas de concurrence "réelle"... L'A332 est une autre histoire, puisque son concurrent le 767 n'est pas en mesure de le battre niveau competitivité... Il en est de même pour l'A330-300 qui rencontre encore un gros succès, son concurrent le 777-200A n'est pas competitif par rapport a lui..
La guerre salit tous ceux qui la font: au fil des mois et des années, j'ai vu les deux bords verser dans le mal, j'ai vu le mal affronté le mal, et le bien, ce qu'il y'a de bon dans l'humain, devenir la victime des deux.
airbus devrait s'en prendre a lui même l'A380 a 2 ans retard, l'A350 un avion ringard face au 787 qui les obliges revoir la conception appeler maintenant A350 XWB ..echec de l'A340-600 et -500 très gourmand en carburant et problème de charge utile face au 777-300ER et 777-200LR 🏴☠️🏴☠️🏴☠️
la vie c'est un voyage dési la terre nou lé ké passager ouh ouh créole en profite ton liberté
Après, très gourmand, il ne faut pas non plus exagéré! Il reste parmi les avions de grosses capacités aujourd'hui beaucoup moins glouton que les 744 ou autre!
Après disons qu'Airbus, contrairement a Boeing n'a pas pris de risque en proposant un quadri reacteurs, Boeing en a pris un sacré risque en essayant d'obtenir un bi-reacteur, c'etait un pari risqué...
Parce que, il faut aussi se rappelé que l'un des réacteurs les plus puissants qui avait été crée, l'a été par RR et a été détenu pendant quelques temps... Et aurait donc pu etre adaptés au 346, ce qui aujourd'hui, permettrait d'avoir un 346 bcp plus competitif si il avait été en bi-reacteur!
C'est là où Airbus peut se mordre les doigts, c'est à dire d'avoir refusé de prendre un risque!
Après, ne mélangeons pas tout et les retards de l'A380 n'ont pas réellement un rapport!
La guerre salit tous ceux qui la font: au fil des mois et des années, j'ai vu les deux bords verser dans le mal, j'ai vu le mal affronté le mal, et le bien, ce qu'il y'a de bon dans l'humain, devenir la victime des deux.
bref cause des erreurs commises face a boeing, airbus va mangé pour un moment son pain noir ..mais tot ou tard ils ce redressera 😉
la vie c'est un voyage dési la terre nou lé ké passager ouh ouh créole en profite ton liberté
Il est vrai que l'A340-500 et A340-600 tout comme aussi l'A340-300, est pas réellement apprécié par certaines compagnies...
Je pense que le 340-500 avec son autonomie exeptionelle de + de 15000 Km est le seul type réellemnt apprécie, de par cette particularité, par les Cies.
Je pense que le 340-500 avec son autonomie exeptionelle de + de 15000 Km est le seul type réellemnt apprécie, de par cette particularité, par les Cies.
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Il y a aussi quelques compagnies dont Cathay qui se plaint d'un important surpoids à l'avant de l'appareil, donc une diminution pour l'embarquement de fret. D'ailleurs, elle ne devrait pas tarder à retourner tous les avions auprès d'ILFC.
Sinon le 340-600 est aussi victime du mythe des pneus qui explosent à l'attérissage😉. Nous avons tous vu la video des essais décollage/arrêt, mais il semble que ça soit un problème récurrent sur cet avion.
C'est dommage pour le programme 340, de plus Thai Airways a entamé la vente de ses 340-500 pratiquement neuf auprès de SAA.
Sinon le 340-600 est aussi victime du mythe des pneus qui explosent à l'attérissage😉. Nous avons tous vu la video des essais décollage/arrêt, mais il semble que ça soit un problème récurrent sur cet avion.
C'est dommage pour le programme 340, de plus Thai Airways a entamé la vente de ses 340-500 pratiquement neuf auprès de SAA.
Le 345 peut sembler interessant pour les compagnies pour se lancer dans le tres long courrier toutefois ces vols sont souvent boudes par les passagers, comme je m etais deja explique la dessus il y a qqs mois sur le forum les coeff de remplissages des vols SQ en 345 (non stops SIN-LAX et SIN-EWR (le vol non-stop le plus long au monde)) sont en dessous de nos attentes: les passagers preferant rajouter quelques heures a leur parcours et pouvoir profiter d un salon en escale plutot que d'affronter (il n ya pas d autre terme...) 18h30 de vol sans escale.
C'est d'ailleurs la raison qui pousse TG a plannifier la supression de son non stop BKK-JFK et de revendre ses 345 a SA (lancement d'un non stop JNB-ORD, projet pour un JNB-YYZ et suppression du stop a DKR pour la ligne JNB-JFK)
Guillaume
Guillaume
Uniquely Singapore...
Oui mais le problème de surpoid a l'avant n'est pas réellement imputable a Airbus, puisque ce sont les compagnies qui font le choix des configs... Ici, le probleme, c'est qu'un sièges Premiere pese 10x plus qu'un siège éco, alors qu'en place, le rapport est de 4.5! Il en est de même pour les classes affaires...
De plus, Cathay a reconfirmé le leasing des A340-600 jusqu'en 2009, après avoir commandé les 12 77W(18 en tout mtnt), ce qui laisse donc croire que certes Cathay n'est pas ultra heureuse des performances du 346 mais sont bel et bien encore correct!
Justement(pour TG), apparemment, elle perd de l'argent, mais cela permet de nourrir efficacement son hub, et des destinations comme LAX, même si ne sont pas rentables, permettent de faire des bénéfices de l'autre coté.. Donc le choix n'est pas si facile comme on pourrait l'entendre! Et TAM serait aussi intéréssé par les 345, en effet, ils ont besoin d'avion maintenant!
De plus, Cathay a reconfirmé le leasing des A340-600 jusqu'en 2009, après avoir commandé les 12 77W(18 en tout mtnt), ce qui laisse donc croire que certes Cathay n'est pas ultra heureuse des performances du 346 mais sont bel et bien encore correct!
Justement(pour TG), apparemment, elle perd de l'argent, mais cela permet de nourrir efficacement son hub, et des destinations comme LAX, même si ne sont pas rentables, permettent de faire des bénéfices de l'autre coté.. Donc le choix n'est pas si facile comme on pourrait l'entendre! Et TAM serait aussi intéréssé par les 345, en effet, ils ont besoin d'avion maintenant!
La guerre salit tous ceux qui la font: au fil des mois et des années, j'ai vu les deux bords verser dans le mal, j'ai vu le mal affronté le mal, et le bien, ce qu'il y'a de bon dans l'humain, devenir la victime des deux.
Voilà, après son succès, qui avait été fait en prenant des risques, Airbus s'est mis a devenir un peu frileux et faudrait qu'elle retrouve son coté aventurière comme entreprise... En effet, on voit bien que durant les 8 dernieres années, lors du lancement du 345/346 et du premier 350, AIrbus n'avait pris que trop peu de risque... Heureusement, la tendance a été inversé..
La guerre salit tous ceux qui la font: au fil des mois et des années, j'ai vu les deux bords verser dans le mal, j'ai vu le mal affronté le mal, et le bien, ce qu'il y'a de bon dans l'humain, devenir la victime des deux.
merci pour toutes ces infos!
cependant j'en aurai d'autres : quels avantages a un quatriréacteurs sur un biréacteurs ? j'ai entendu dire qu'un quadri pouvait s'éloigner plus des côtes qu'un bi. est-ce vrai ? et si c'est le cas quelles lignes peut effectuer un quadri que ne peut pas faire un bi ?
la famille A320 meilleure que le 737, l'A330 meilleur que le 767, l'A330-300 meilleur que le 777-200, seul le 777 surpasse l'A340 apparement, les avions airbus sont souvent supérieurs aux boeing ! c'est surprenant donc qu'airbus soit si décrié...
la famille A320 meilleure que le 737, l'A330 meilleur que le 767, l'A330-300 meilleur que le 777-200, seul le 777 surpasse l'A340 apparement, les avions airbus sont souvent supérieurs aux boeing ! c'est surprenant donc qu'airbus soit si décrié...
L'avantage du quadri reacteurs est le fait qu'il ne prend pas en compte les normes ETOPS, c'est à dire qu'un avion comme le 77W est certifié ETOPS 207, c'est à dire qu'il a le droit de volé a 207mins de vols maximum d'un aeroport le plus proche... A la fin des années 90, la plupart des normes ETOPS etait 120min, voir 90 pour certains avions... Ce qui créeait des détours comme par ex dans le Pacifique...
Aujourd'hui, les nouveaux réacteurs sont de plus en plus fiables, ces normes sont donc revus a la hausse!
Aujourd'hui, l'interêt d'un quadri reacteurs reste pour des zones comme le Pacifique Sud( d'où la récente commande de Lan Airlines de plusieurs 340, sinon, elle se serait surement tourné vers le 777). Le sud de l'Océan Indien est encore aussi soumis a des restrictions non négligeables pour les 777! L'Atlantique Sud est encore soumis a des restrictions!
Aujourd'hui, les lignes qui nécéssitent vraiment un 340 sont donc de plus en plus rare... Et doivent se compté sur les doigts de la main ou presque!
Pour le 737/ 320, je dirais qu'ils sont au coude à coude niveau efficacité... Et que les couts d'opération sont très très similaire, d'où le relatif succès des deux modèles, même si le 320 tire son épingle du jeu dans le fait qu'il a été réellement novateur..
A330-200: meilleur que le 767-300ER
767-400ER: meilleur que l'A330-200 (en capacité, le 332 se situe entre le 763 et le 764)
A330-300: meilleur que le 777-200A(rayon d'action très proche avec un nombre assez proche de passagers transportés pour un poid beaucoup plus faible, en gros, c'est la même chose que le 747-8F et le 380F)
777-200ER: meilleur que l'A340-300
777-200LR: meilleur que l'A340-500
777-300ER: meilleur que l'A340-600
380 vs 747-8: grand inconnu encore..
380F vs 747-8F: apparemment, avantage au 748F...
Je tiens à dire que je simplifie grandement la donne, car souvent, pour une compagnie, cela ne se résume pas seuleument a son éfficacité, mais par exemple, les 345 et 346 d'Airbus sont environ 15% moins cher au prix catalogue que leurs concurrents de chez Boeing! Aujourd'hui, je pense qu'en long courrier, la meilleur combinaison reste le 332/772ER/77W et dans un futur proche, complété par l'A380, ce n'est qu'un avis...
Je tiens à dire que je simplifie grandement la donne, car souvent, pour une compagnie, cela ne se résume pas seuleument a son éfficacité, mais par exemple, les 345 et 346 d'Airbus sont environ 15% moins cher au prix catalogue que leurs concurrents de chez Boeing! Aujourd'hui, je pense qu'en long courrier, la meilleur combinaison reste le 332/772ER/77W et dans un futur proche, complété par l'A380, ce n'est qu'un avis...
La guerre salit tous ceux qui la font: au fil des mois et des années, j'ai vu les deux bords verser dans le mal, j'ai vu le mal affronté le mal, et le bien, ce qu'il y'a de bon dans l'humain, devenir la victime des deux.
Airbus will receive another blow this week when US Airways ditches a $3.7 billion (£1.85 billion) order in favour of the aircraft manufacturer’s American rival, Boeing.
The Times understands that US Airways will announce an order for between 20 and 30 Boeing 787 Dreamliners within the next 48 hours. The deal will be worth between $3.2 billion and $4.9 billion at list prices.
The low-cost carrier had previously ordered 20 A350s from Airbus but has opted to go with Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner instead.
The 787, a twin-aisle plane that is between the 737 and 747 in size, is the fastest-selling commercial jet ever, with over 540 orders worth a total of $88 billion at list prices.
Boeing won another customer at the expense of Airbus yesterday when Sir Richard Branson, chairman of Virgin Atlantic, bought the 787 ahead of the A350. The Virgin order was for up to 43 jets worth $8 billion and will replace its existing Airbus fleet.
The A350 was redesigned last year after airlines told the manufacturer that its offering was not as good as Boeing’s 787. US Airways had been expected to upgrade to the A350XWB, as the new design is called, but it has instead shifted allegiance to Boeing.
Part of Airbus’s problem with the A350 is that it has only just left the drawing board, while Boeing will fly the first 787 later this year. Airlines are opting to buy an aircraft that is reality rather than one that still only exists on paper.
US Airways was hit hard by the collapse in the aviation sector after 9/11 and entered Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in August, 2002. It was bought by America West in 2005 and is now looking for long-haul aircraft to fly international and transcontinental routes.
Les cons ça ose tout, même de prendre AF...
Non pas que je remette les propos du Times, mais un article d'un spécialiste de l'aviation, c'est ATWOnline, qui est digne de confiance a annoncé exactement le contraire il y'a quelques jours, donc personnellement, je pense que c'est 50/50 et donc j'attend de voir!
La guerre salit tous ceux qui la font: au fil des mois et des années, j'ai vu les deux bords verser dans le mal, j'ai vu le mal affronté le mal, et le bien, ce qu'il y'a de bon dans l'humain, devenir la victime des deux.
le pb de l'A350 est qui sera dispo en 2012, or le b787 est presque done... et puis niveau conso, et puis niveay know-how......
Les cons ça ose tout, même de prendre AF...
C'est même mi 2013 pour l'A350!
Oui il est presque pret le 787, mais attention, Boeing n'a pas le droit au moindre retard, les délais sont très très short a tenir, et le programme si il a du retard sera repoussé d'autant dans toutes les commandes car les chaines sont pleines jusqu'en 2012 aujourd'hui! Les grandes compagnies peuvent avoir des créneaux en 2011 mais rien avant pour le moment!
Niveau conso, le 350 sera sans aucun doute meilleur
L'ancienne version consommait environ 5% de plus que le 787, là, il y'a de fortes chances que cela soit l'inverse! Certes, rien n'est fait encore et aucun chiffre autres que les officiels ne sortent... Les officiels c'est7% de moins que le 787...
Mais bon Us Airways peut encore relativmeent attendre car les 330 sont encore relativements neufs, il n'y a que les 767 a remplacé... Schant que le 787 n'est pas dispo avant 2012, cela ne change donc pas grand chose a la donne..
La guerre salit tous ceux qui la font: au fil des mois et des années, j'ai vu les deux bords verser dans le mal, j'ai vu le mal affronté le mal, et le bien, ce qu'il y'a de bon dans l'humain, devenir la victime des deux.
Emirates pourrait commander de nouveaux A380 ??
http://www.capital.fr/Actualite/Default.asp?source=AO&numero=920318&Cat=SOF
Emirates mulls low cost carrier http://www.capital.fr/Actualite/Default.asp?source=AO&numero=920318&Cat=SOF
ils veulent faire une collection d'A380 ou ils rêvent de faire d'émirates une compagnie low-cost 😏😏
http://www.capital.fr/Actualite/Default.asp?source=AO&numero=920318&Cat=SOF
Emirates mulls low cost carrier http://www.capital.fr/Actualite/Default.asp?source=AO&numero=920318&Cat=SOF
ils veulent faire une collection d'A380 ou ils rêvent de faire d'émirates une compagnie low-cost 😏😏
la vie c'est un voyage dési la terre nou lé ké passager ouh ouh créole en profite ton liberté
Log in first, then come back to this page.
You might also like
Storm in the Canary Islands
New adventures from Perpignan to Ranchi (Jharkhand)
Breathtaking Kyrgyzstan!
Argentine and Chilean Patagonia from El Calafate to Ushuaia
Turkey 2026: Riviera, Antalya, and Cappadocia
Page by Page on the Assisi Way – 1,200 km on Foot
How to nail your trek in wet climates: which pants keep you truly dry?
Densha Otaku - Lesser-Known Regions
More discussions
Hello,
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August. My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August. My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Bonjour,
J'ai réservé un billet Etihad sur leur site Dusseldorf-Abu Dhabi. Dans la case prénom j'ai mis tous mes prénoms (chose que je ne fais jamais et je regrette mais le site portait à confusion); tout est correctement orthographié mais le problème est que je viens de recevoir mon nouveau passeport est seuls apparaissent mes 2 premiers prénoms et la première lettre du 3ème, aucune trace du dernier.
J'ai téléphoné à Etihad qui a bien évidemment essayé de me faire payé 100 USD pour enlever ce dernier prénom, mais j'hésite car d'habitude je ne mets que mon 1er prénom et pas les autres et je n'ai jamais eu de problème... Alors je me demande si l'ajout de ce dernier prénom qui n'apparaît pas sur le passeport pourrait me voir refusé au check in.. Merci pour votre retour
J'ai téléphoné à Etihad qui a bien évidemment essayé de me faire payé 100 USD pour enlever ce dernier prénom, mais j'hésite car d'habitude je ne mets que mon 1er prénom et pas les autres et je n'ai jamais eu de problème... Alors je me demande si l'ajout de ce dernier prénom qui n'apparaît pas sur le passeport pourrait me voir refusé au check in.. Merci pour votre retour
Hi there,
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon. I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport. Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…). AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly. On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double! In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others? Given the price difference, I’m hesitant… Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go? Thanks, HERVE
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon. I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport. Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…). AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly. On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double! In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others? Given the price difference, I’m hesitant… Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go? Thanks, HERVE
Hi everyone,
Next January, I’m heading to India.
My outbound flight is with Emirates from Paris to Dubai, then another Emirates flight from Dubai to Calcutta.
Could anyone tell me how the connection works? I’ve heard there’s a dedicated Emirates zone, but how does it actually work in practice—I’ve got a 2-hour layover.
Thanks so much!
Take care.
Hi everyone, I’ve unfortunately only just noticed that I booked two flight tickets, but I made a mistake on the second first name. Basically, my computer auto-filled and typed my first name twice, so both tickets are in my first name. Only the last names—mine and my friend’s—are correct.
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common). I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common). I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
Great news for those heading to Bahia / Salvador toward the end of the year.
Air France plans to increase flights from 3 to 5 during the December 2026 / February 2027 period.
Original source: Salvador terá mais voos diretos para Paris durante o verão; veja o que muda | Jornal Correio 1
Tropical greetings from Salvador,
@IvanBahiaGuide
(local specialist, active on the French-speaking Brazil Forums for over 16 years now)
Hello,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi there,
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
Hi,
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
Hi there,
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
Hi,
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
Hi,
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
Hello,
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
Hello,
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Hi everyone,
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
Hi there!
Has anyone taken the direct flight from CDG to Las Vegas with Air France?
Looking forward to your feedback!
Hey everyone,
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
Hi there,
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric
Hi there,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
Hi there,
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry
Hi there,
I have a question...
Has anyone managed to get a refund from Oman Air?
After a delayed flight, we missed our connecting flight to get home!! At midnight, the flight attendant booked us on a flight to Nice via Munich, even though we were in Munich and wanted to get back to Nice... Too tired from the trip, we didn’t notice the mistake!! The next day, of course, the booking wasn’t valid!! We had to pay again for the flight back to Nice... I’m really struggling!! I think they’re giving me the runaround!! I’ve sent several emails, tried Messenger and WhatsApp, but the only responses I get are: "We need to investigate!! We’ll get back to you in 15 days!!" It’s been over a month!!
I just sent a registered letter (LRAR) to their office at Paris Charles de Gaulle, which is still open!!
Do you have any other suggestions for me?
Thanks in advance for your help! Virginie
After a delayed flight, we missed our connecting flight to get home!! At midnight, the flight attendant booked us on a flight to Nice via Munich, even though we were in Munich and wanted to get back to Nice... Too tired from the trip, we didn’t notice the mistake!! The next day, of course, the booking wasn’t valid!! We had to pay again for the flight back to Nice... I’m really struggling!! I think they’re giving me the runaround!! I’ve sent several emails, tried Messenger and WhatsApp, but the only responses I get are: "We need to investigate!! We’ll get back to you in 15 days!!" It’s been over a month!!
I just sent a registered letter (LRAR) to their office at Paris Charles de Gaulle, which is still open!!
Do you have any other suggestions for me?
Thanks in advance for your help! Virginie
Hi!
Sri Lanka has announced it could run out of fuel in the coming weeks if the Strait of Hormuz remains blocked. The government has implemented a mandatory four-day workweek to save oil, and there are long lines at gas stations due to fears of an early shortage.
In Vietnam, the government has warned all airlines that flights will need to be reduced due to a lack of kerosene. The country imports two-thirds of its jet fuel from China and Thailand, but both countries have now banned exports out of fear of domestic shortages.
The state is asking airlines to plan ahead and park aircraft to drastically reduce operations, starting with domestic flights and then international ones. International carriers will also need to cut back on their rotations.
This will begin in the coming days. 🙁