Je passe bien evidemment les changements saisonniers comme ICN, JFK, DEL, BKK, SFO, etc...
En rumeur pour cet hiver:
On parle de l'ajout d'un 2eme vol quotidien sur EZE(soit pour l'hiver 2008-2009). De plus, toujours sur l'Amerique du Sud, on parle encore de REC. A noté que Tam a fait une demande auprès des autorités brésiliennes pour l'ajout d'une 4eme fréquence sur CDG.. D'ailleurs, a partir de cet été, TAM proposera 1x/sem voir 2x/sem des vols CDG/SSA. Cette 4eme fréquence permettrait donc a AF de continué son expansion sur le Brésil, soit sur GRU soit sur REC.
Pour l'été 2008: LAX passera a 3x/jr, HKG a 2x/jr, PVG a 2x/jr, DFW est prévu pour l'été 2008. SJO est normalement prévu l'hiver 2008-2009...
Voilà, c'etait tres tres court, désolé!
Salut,
J'ai entendu dire que le second vol sur EZE serait en fait un vol de jour (dans le sens Europe -> Argentine) opéré par KL... Quant à SJO, j'avais lu (et j'ai retrouvé un son de cloche équivalent sur FT) qu'il pourrait s'agir d'un prolongement du ORY-PTP, qui en fait donnerait ORY-PTP-SJO et pareil pour ORY-PTP-PTY, puisqu'il semble y avoir du "potentiel de croissance" entre les Caraïbes francophones et l'Amérique centrale... to be confirmed!
Pour EZE, la réponse est presque non a plus de 80%. La partie de l'Amerique du Sud qui comprend le Brésil, L'Argentine et le Chili est une terre d'AF, KL y desservira seuleument les villes ayant du marché et non, comme fonction de hub... Malheureusement, sur l'Amerique du Sud, le marché reste tres restreint pour KL, même si les taux de remplissage sur GRU sont bon, une expansion sur l'Amerique du Sud restera très limité... La preuve, j'ai constamment entendu sur d'autre forums que KL allait ouvrir GIG, allait doublé les GRU, aujourd'hui après 2ans, j'attend toujours...
Cela sera KL qui ouvrira EZE pour deux seules raisons uniquement: Accords bilatéraux restrictifs ou manque d'avion pour AF et dispo nécéssaire chez KL. Rien d'autre...
Après pour SJO, c'est effectivement ce qui pourrait se passé dans un premier temps, c'est aussi l'option la moins risqué car la plus économique... Kingston est aussi murmuré depuis PTP. Le prochain A320 sur les DOM TOM n'a pas encore réellement été affecté, pas à ma connaissance en tout cas, mais il vise normalement un renforcement sur certaines destinations et si SJO etait ouvert depuis PTP, cela serait seulement avec quelques fréquences par semaines! Moins de 5! Peut etre 3!
Sur, jamais... 😉 Le dernier exemple en date a été DFW... Depuis longtemps, j'entendais parlé de SEA comme futur porte, puis presque d'un seul coup DFW fait son apparition comme prochaine destination, ce n'était pas non plus très surprenant non plus, car elle fait partie des destinations sur la "short list" pour les USA(a ce moment la, il y'avait SEA, PHX, DEN et secondairement DFW, SLC et CLT (ces deux destinations sont prévus pour 2009 mais respectivement par DL et CO)). Puis après l'iruption de DFW, plus rien et deux mois plus tard, AF annonce SEA...
C'est un peu la même chose pour REC en Amerique du Sud, j'en entend parlé depuis quelques temps et en ce moment plus rien du tout... Surtout qu'apparemment, AF hésiterait entre ajouté un 3eme vol quotidien et ajouté REC.. Tam a demandé auprès des autorités brésiliennes une 4eme fréquence sur cette meme route, si elle l'optient, Air France en aura une.. Apres cela serait étonnant qu'elle la mette en place d'ici l'hiver 2007-2008... En effet, Tam est bien partie pour ouvrir une 4eme ligne, ce qui ferait 9x/jr entre le Brésil et CDG! (petite précision, Varig doit réouvrir CDG le 1er novembre en quotidien en 763)... Voila pour la grosse parenthèse!
De ce que je peux te dire, c'est que, cela sera au pire a la saison été 2009.. 😇😉 Après, comme il a été souligné, l'incertitude de ce vol est grande, c'est a dire soit en direct de CDG voit en escale via ORY... Le probleme d'ORY est qu'il ne permettra pas de nourrir le hub de CDG, et cela seront limités au marché domestique francais et des Dom-TOm, ce qui reste limité, d'où la grande hésitation d'AF et d'où l'incertitude..
C'est une bonne nouvelle pour GIG! Il était temps d'un deuxième vol vers Rio car CDG-GIG-CDG est souvent complet et les billets même en Y se chiffrent assez haut... Il faut dire aussi qu'un moment donné - après le 11 septembre 2001, AF était la seule compagnie européenne à offrir des vols non-stop entre GIG et l'Europe et ce pendant longtemps en plus de posséder une marque très forte auprès des turistes brésiliens.
EZE mérite aussi un deuxième vol et à mon avis le schéma daylight dans vers GRU/GIG/EZE et red-eye vers CDG fonctionne à très bien.
GRU a été choisi par KL comme première destination pour son gros porteur B777-300ER à partir du mois de mars 2008.
Par contre, je ne sais toujours pas si celui-ci est saisonnier... De plus, une premiere classe pourrait revenir sur GIG avec le 772 ou le 77W... On verra bien donc pour la saison été 2008 ce qui va se passé..
Oui, pas réellement étonnant, les taux de remplissage de KL sur GRU sont d'environ 88%, ce qui reste très convenable... Dispo en quotidien en mars? Je n'ai pas du tout les dates de livraisons des 77W pour KL donc je me renseigne un peu!
En tout cas, faudrait qu'Air France continue son expansion sur le Brésil, pour tenter de concurrencé TAP comme la compagnie ayant la plus forte présence au Brésil.. Une 3eme fréquence sur GRU serait une très bonne chose, sachant que le vol en 332 n'a fait baissé le taux de remplissage que de 2 points... Il est d'environ 90% aujourd'hui sur GRU.. Après des fréquences sup serait possible sur les destinations du Nord du Brésil... Comme REC, destination étant étudié par AF depuis quelques temps..
Attendons voir comment les choses vont se passer aux niveau de la deuxième fréquence AF vers GIG en 332.
J'ai mes doutes sur la capacité de GIG absorber L'Espace Première sur l'une des fréquences... et une troisième fréquence vol que ce soit vers
GRU ou GIG ne serait pas une bonne idée à mes yeux car cela pourrait nuire le remplissage des deux autres...
L'idéal serait de réetudier l'accord bilatéral entre la France et le Brésil de façon à permettre des vols non-stop entre la France et le Nord-Est brésilien - genre un combiné CDG/REC/SSA/CDG en 332 - l'appareil idéal pour tester des nouvelles routes, pour offrir une option aux SSA-REC/LIS de TP et le SSA/MAD d'UX.
Le premier 777-300ER de KLM arrive sur GRU le 2 mars 2008 - KL791/KL792 AMS-GRU-AMS, en revanche il ne s'agit pas d'une desserte quotidienne de GRU avec cet appareil - pour l'instant, car KLM prétend l'envoyer aussi à DXB.
De cette façon le programme est le suivant:
Je pense qu'un 3eme vol sur GRU ne serait pas une mauvaise chose, et je pense que cela ne va pas autant nuire... Personnellement, il est clair qu'une fréquence en 3x ou 5x/semaine sur REC serait plus logique et permettrait d'offrir plus de point to point qu'aujourd'hui, car il est vrai qu'une partie non négligeable des passagers d'AF pasasnt par GRU sont en transit et le transit est de plus en plus galère a GRU, je l'ai vécu et les retards sont souvent légion pour la plage de départ de 22h de GRU!
Pour un triangle SSA et REC, AF n'en est pas réellement habitué, après le monde change et AF peut changé ses habitudes.. Après, personnellement, je pense qu'il faudrait faire attention car si AF ajoute une nouvelle fréquence sur le Brésil cet hiver, on touchera les 9x/jr...! Ce qui serait une augmentation énorme comparé a cet hiver, presque 50%...
je suis navré de demander cela mais serait-il possible pour le 1er message seulement d'indiquer les aéroport correspondant aux abbréviations. Je suis novice mais j'adore ce type de sujet et je connais qq abbréviations mais pas toutes...par exemple GRG, MAA???? je sais que c'est du boulot pour le 1er message mais pensez aux pauv' novices comme moi.
Merci!
Personnellement, je ne pense pas que tu nous embete! Lorsque l'on parle en abrégé comme je le fais, j'en oublie souvent, il est vrai que tout le monde ne les connais pas... Et puis bon, si on trainaille sur des forum, c'est que cela nous dérange pas de répondre aux questions! Et personnellement, c'est mon cas!
JNB: AF994/997: passe en 77W (contre 772 précedemment). Pour l'instant, c'est saisonnier... Apparemment, la sortie de SAA du marché n'y est pas étrangère..
Autre chose, le vol sur EZE a l'air de rester au 772 contrairement à ce qui était prévu...Peut être en lien avec le lancement d'un vol direct 5/semaine FRA-EZE en 744 de LH...
Oui en effet. Maintenant la question que l'on peut se posé: où est attribué l'autre 77W qui devait etre utilisé sur EZE? Apparemment, un est envoyé sur JNB mais le 2eme...
JFK : Qu'en est-il du tandem AF004/AF005 qu'AF avait lancé en fanfare ? (le fameux vol de jour au retour de JFK). Il semble être sorti du programme d'hiver. C'était un vol saisonnier ? Manque d'avions ?
Mais qui reviens pour la prochaine saison été! Les remplissages du AF004 etait assez bon, ceux du 005, moins bon!
SIN, BKK, JNB sont les 3 destinations principales qui sont "viable" en correspondance pour ce vol, dans la mesure ou le surplus kilometrage effectué est en dessous de 15%. Apres, pour les autres destinations comme HKG, PEK, PVG, le surplus est compris entre 20 et 30%, ce qui ne deviens pas viable, à pars quand on est en haute saison et que, via le Pacifique, l'offre est quasi inexistante!
En effet, les possibilités de correspondance ne sont pas enorme et la plupart des destinations
De meme, AF a décidé de coupé les capacités sur l'Amerique du Nord des octobre pour cet année et a décidé de ne pas attendre la saison hiver! BOS, PHL, JFK, DTW commence donc déja des réductions de capacité des octobre!
Et pourquoi ne pas mettre en place des vols de nuit pour l'Inde qui partiraient de CDG le soir vers 22 ou 23 h ? (soit un décalage de 12 heures par rapport aux rotations actuelles vers ces destinations). En plus, les vols retours de l'Inde s'effecturaient vers 1 ou 2 h de l'après midi (au lieu des infâmes 2 h du mat actuels).
Je m'etais aussi longtemps posé la question, jusqu'au jour ou j'ai vu les chiffres du nombre de personnes en correspondance!
Je m'explique, sur l'Inde avec AF, seul 25% des entrées sont des personnes françaises. 25% sont européennes. Le reste? 50% d'americain. Cela monte a 70% sur BLR!
Ce qui voudrait dire que des vols en apres midi ou soirée ne serait nourri que par l'Europe et non les USA, a pars si le vol AF004/005 ne serait pas saisonnier...
Ce qui veut dire que des vols, vers 20h-23h ne serait que des vols supplémentaires aux vols d'aujourd'hui de la matinée. Et aujourd'hui, avec l'explosion de compagnie sur le territoire, de vols, le yield, pour toutes les compagnies s'est tres tres dégradé... Il suffit de voir les prix aujourd'hui pour l'Inde dans les classes affaires et premiere! En éco, les remplissages sont souvent bon sur les compagnies européennes, le yield beaucoup moins.. De meme, pour AF, les accords bilatéraux devrait normalement posé un petit probleme!
??? Tu dois surement te trompé! Semaine du 11 au 18 juin 2008, AF utilise bien un 744 sur CDG-YYZ! Si AF utilise un 744 en juin 2008 comme c'est normalement le cas, cela serait plus que surprenant (je dirais illogique) que cela ne soit pas le cas en juillet, aout 2008!
En effet, la demande en éco justifie la présence d'un 744 en été, mais pas d'un second vol, la demande en business ne suis pas réellement et la demande serait trop importante, le 744 est donc, pour la saison été le meilleur choix.
Bonjour!
Cet ete je suis alle sur http://w3.airfrance.com/cgi-bin/AF/CA/fr/local/resainfovol/horaires/afficheDetailsVols.do et j'ai constate que Air France va utiliser des 343 sur YYZ-CDG cet hiver mais plus tard en ete 2008, Air France utilisera un 744 mais si ca continue comme ca un 388 pourra etre necessaire sur CDG-YYZ tot ou tard.
Merci Felix allias b1kuby53.
Oui, c'est un réajustement saisonnier sur l'Amerique du Nord comme il y'en a beaucoup a ce moment la! Il est vrai que le Canada reste une exception puisqu'en général, YUL n'est pas pertubé par la baisse drastique des capacités sur l'AM du Nord en saison hiver.
Non, pas de 380 de prévu, dans le court terme ou moyen terme:
1/ Avant d'avoir un A380 sur une ligne, la premiere chose est d'avoir plus fréquence sur cette ligne, normalement deux, voir plus. (seul SIN est l'exception dans les destinations en projet d'AF)
2/ La demande, aujourd'hui, ne le justifie pas. l'A380 est un avion pour les lignes premium. Aujourd'hui, YYZ ne l'est pas. Sinon, l'appareil qui desservirai YYZ serait un 777-200ER ou 777-300ER, mais pas d'A340-300 ni 747-400.
Hi there,
I’m planning a winter trip across India. Departing in early December and returning to France in mid-April.
My main concern is finding an airline that offers this round-trip with the fewest hassles regarding cancellations or flight schedule changes. The unstable geopolitical situation in the Middle East isn’t making this search any easier—recent reviews online about airlines from Gulf states describe quite a few struggles over the past few months.
The direct Paris-Delhi round-trip flights offered by Air France or Air India are probably the safest options, but not the cheapest!
Given this uncertainty, I’m still holding off on finalizing my ticket purchase... Maybe some of you India lovers on VoyageForum have tips or experiences to share?
Thanks, and happy travels to all.
Hi everyone,
Next January, I’m heading to India.
My outbound flight is with Emirates from Paris to Dubai, then another Emirates flight from Dubai to Calcutta.
Could anyone tell me how the connection works? I’ve heard there’s a dedicated Emirates zone, but how does it actually work in practice—I’ve got a 2-hour layover.
Thanks so much!
Take care.
Hi,
I’m thinking of heading to Malaysia soon.
I’ve seen some great prices and direct flights from Paris with Malaysia Airlines.
Is it a reliable airline?
Thanks for your feedback!
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August.
My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Hi there,
We had planned a trip to Sicily in August, and due to the volcanic eruption of Mount Etna, my flight was canceled. The airline is refunding the outbound flight, but none of the non-refundable expenses: accommodation booked through Booking, rental car, and the return flight aren’t covered. My SUPER Gold card doesn’t work in this specific case! :( If anyone has been in this situation, could you let me know if you were able to get any recourse and, if so, how?
Thanks in advance
I’ve been traveling regularly for over twenty years,
but this is the first time an airline has treated me as poorly as Air France.
Two trips, two problems. The latest:
Trip from Seoul to Rennes. Last leg from Paris CDG to Rennes with Air France.
I arrive in Paris and go straight to Air France to get my boarding pass to Rennes. They assure me my baggage is continuing to Rennes.
Arriving in Rennes, no baggage—same as five other people.
The Air France office is closed, and the airport staff tell me there’s rarely anyone there.
With the help of the airport staff, I file a claim online, and my baggage is almost immediately located. As a result, I’m told I’ll have it the next day.
Four days later, the baggage is still in the same place at CDG—nothing’s moving.
The problem is Air France has no customer service. What they call customer service is a department that takes an hour to answer and just repeats what’s on the online form. No coordination, no way to get things moving. I guess Air France would rather pay the compensation after 21 days than actually do something.
I’ve had lost baggage on other trips, but this is the first time I’ve seen such indifference and lack of professionalism.
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi,
I booked an Etihad ticket on their website for Dusseldorf-Abu Dhabi. In the first name field, I entered all my first names (something I never do and I regret it, but the site was confusing). Everything is spelled correctly, but the problem is that I just received my new passport and only my first two first names and the first letter of the third appear—there’s no trace of the last one.
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in.
Thanks for your feedback!
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon.
I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport.
Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…).
AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly.
On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double!
In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others?
Given the price difference, I’m hesitant…
Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go?
Thanks,
HERVE
Hi everyone, I’ve unfortunately only just noticed that I booked two flight tickets, but I made a mistake on the second first name. Basically, my computer auto-filled and typed my first name twice, so both tickets are in my first name. Only the last names—mine and my friend’s—are correct.
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common).
I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows:
- Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes;
- A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late;
- Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens);
- Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight;
- If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation;
- The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason;
- In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/
Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed.
- Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps.
- Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation.
- If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/
- If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed.
- The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt.
- Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont.
- Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia.
Sincerely,
Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding.
Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage...
Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket.
On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata
On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto
I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer.
Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine.
I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket?
(It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania.
The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines.
So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers.
Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this.
Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops.
Do any of you have updates?
Thanks!
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG.
Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover?
We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker).
We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA.
For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai.
Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)?
We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one).
The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much!
I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul?
I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace.
It’s this model:
https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?