Original post
Hi,
I’m planning a trip to Australia—Paris to Melbourne.
I’m flying with Etihad and have a 1-hour connection in Abu Dhabi.
Does that seem doable to you?
Thanks for your feedback and experiences!
Connection time in Abu Dhabi
by Letizef
Translated into English.
Hello,
In theory, if Etihad offers it for sale on their website, it means it's doable (they run calculations, and connections that aren't feasible aren't offered). But in reality, it's stressful because if there's a slight delay on the first flight, you might miss the second one. (Though if it's all on one ticket, the airline should find you a solution, it's still a hassle.) The other risk is that even if you make the second flight, your luggage might not. (That just happened to us with a 1h20 connection in Paris—we made it, but our bags didn’t.) And finally, between two long flights, it’s actually nice to have 2 or 3 hours to walk around. So I’d say if you can get a longer connection, it’s better! !
Hi there,
The issue is that if the first flight segment has even the slightest delay, you’ll miss your connection. In this case, the airline must re-route you free of charge via another flight and provide (or reimburse) meals (and accommodation if you have to stay overnight) while you wait for the re-routing, plus compensation of 600 € per paying passenger. https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2021/03/02/remboursement-frais-en-attente-du-vol-retarde-ou-de-reacheminement/ https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2022/04/18/retard-premier-vol-correspondance-manquee/
To do: If this happens, as soon as you get off the first flight, check https://www.google.com/travel/flights?hl=fr to see what the "earliest possible" re-routing is—whether with the same airline or another. Start the booking process but stop just before paying, taking screenshots. If the airline offers a later re-routing when you can PROVE there was an available seat on an earlier flight, they can’t use any excuse to deny your compensation. Keep your final destination hotel’s phone number or email handy to notify them of the delay. https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2023/09/29/indemnisation-meme-si-circonstance-extraordinaire-droit-reacheminement-dans-les-meilleurs-delais/ and an example procedure: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/
The second issue with a very short layover is that checked baggage won’t make it. Your checked bag will be delivered later to your hotel.
To do: Pack essentials in your carry-on, including a change of clothes for 48 hours. At your final destination, don’t leave the baggage claim area until you’ve obtained a P.I.R. (Property Irregularity Report). For long-haul flights, expect around 48 hours due to the heavy administrative procedures for transporting luggage without its owner.
What not to do: Don’t waste money on phone calls to the airline—it’ll be at your expense and completely unnecessary since everything needed is done once you have the P.I.R. They won’t send a private jet for your suitcase.
Best regards
The issue is that if the first flight segment has even the slightest delay, you’ll miss your connection. In this case, the airline must re-route you free of charge via another flight and provide (or reimburse) meals (and accommodation if you have to stay overnight) while you wait for the re-routing, plus compensation of 600 € per paying passenger. https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2021/03/02/remboursement-frais-en-attente-du-vol-retarde-ou-de-reacheminement/ https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2022/04/18/retard-premier-vol-correspondance-manquee/
To do: If this happens, as soon as you get off the first flight, check https://www.google.com/travel/flights?hl=fr to see what the "earliest possible" re-routing is—whether with the same airline or another. Start the booking process but stop just before paying, taking screenshots. If the airline offers a later re-routing when you can PROVE there was an available seat on an earlier flight, they can’t use any excuse to deny your compensation. Keep your final destination hotel’s phone number or email handy to notify them of the delay. https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2023/09/29/indemnisation-meme-si-circonstance-extraordinaire-droit-reacheminement-dans-les-meilleurs-delais/ and an example procedure: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/
The second issue with a very short layover is that checked baggage won’t make it. Your checked bag will be delivered later to your hotel.
To do: Pack essentials in your carry-on, including a change of clothes for 48 hours. At your final destination, don’t leave the baggage claim area until you’ve obtained a P.I.R. (Property Irregularity Report). For long-haul flights, expect around 48 hours due to the heavy administrative procedures for transporting luggage without its owner.
What not to do: Don’t waste money on phone calls to the airline—it’ll be at your expense and completely unnecessary since everything needed is done once you have the P.I.R. They won’t send a private jet for your suitcase.
Best regards
Hello,
I’m planning a trip to Australia: Paris to Melbourne.
I’m flying with Etihad with a 1-hour connection in Abu Dhabi.
Does this connection time seem doable to you?
Thanks for your feedback.
1 hour—knowing that the boarding gates close 40 minutes before departure—I wouldn’t risk it, even if the airline offers it. Any hassles will be on you.
1 hour—knowing that the boarding gates close 40 minutes before departure—I wouldn’t risk it, even if the airline offers it. Any hassles will be on you.
Hi,
If the airline sells it that way, it means it works out in at least 90% of cases. For the rest, just know you’ll be rebooked—nothing critical, just make sure you don’t have any obligations at your destination within, say, 24 to 36 hours after your scheduled arrival.
Personally, I always try to avoid these kinds of plans since they quickly ramp up the stress as soon as you board the first flight. I don’t know who’s saying the gates close 40 minutes before the scheduled departure, but I don’t buy it—it’s usually about a quarter of an hour, pretty much everywhere.
Michel
If the airline sells it that way, it means it works out in at least 90% of cases. For the rest, just know you’ll be rebooked—nothing critical, just make sure you don’t have any obligations at your destination within, say, 24 to 36 hours after your scheduled arrival.
Personally, I always try to avoid these kinds of plans since they quickly ramp up the stress as soon as you board the first flight. I don’t know who’s saying the gates close 40 minutes before the scheduled departure, but I don’t buy it—it’s usually about a quarter of an hour, pretty much everywhere.
Michel
Hello,
If the airline sells it that way, it means it’s allowed,
Michel
Hello,
Back when I was unaware of air passenger rights, another airline (Iberia) sold me a connection in Madrid that was a few minutes shorter than the MCT in the past. As a result, my connection was canceled, and I was rebooked on a later flight (over 3 hours later), even though I was still in the air on the first leg, which had no delay.
So, you can’t just say, "If the airline sells it that way, it’s allowed."
Iberia ended up having to compensate me because they initially refused to do anything.
Best regards,
If the airline sells it that way, it means it’s allowed,
Michel
Hello,
Back when I was unaware of air passenger rights, another airline (Iberia) sold me a connection in Madrid that was a few minutes shorter than the MCT in the past. As a result, my connection was canceled, and I was rebooked on a later flight (over 3 hours later), even though I was still in the air on the first leg, which had no delay.
So, you can’t just say, "If the airline sells it that way, it’s allowed."
Iberia ended up having to compensate me because they initially refused to do anything.
Best regards,
In this case, the MCT, as you call it, is 60 minutes.
So, my connection was canceled, with re-routing on a later flight (more than 3 hours later), while I was still in the air on the first flight segment, which had no delay.
"So" isn’t the right word—there’s no causality here.
So, you can’t say "If the airline sells it this way, it must work out."
Re-routings usually don’t thrill them all that much.
I know your quasi-profession here seems to be suing the whole world for a few dozen euros or a procedural point that gives you this or that right, but in my view, most travelers value their time and freedom more and stay pragmatic.
Michel
So, my connection was canceled, with re-routing on a later flight (more than 3 hours later), while I was still in the air on the first flight segment, which had no delay.
"So" isn’t the right word—there’s no causality here.
So, you can’t say "If the airline sells it this way, it must work out."
Re-routings usually don’t thrill them all that much.
I know your quasi-profession here seems to be suing the whole world for a few dozen euros or a procedural point that gives you this or that right, but in my view, most travelers value their time and freedom more and stay pragmatic.
Michel
Hello,
In this case, the MCT, as you say, is 60 minutes.
In Madrid, the MCT between terminals T4 and T4S was, at that time, 65 minutes. Then it was reduced to 55 minutes.
"So" isn’t the right word—there’s no causality.
??? My connection was canceled because it was shorter than the MCT.
I know that your quasi-profession here consists of suing the whole world for a few dozen euros or a procedural point that gives you this or that right.
Michel
What you call a "quasi-profession" is the fact that I don’t tolerate airlines (not the "whole world"!!!) believing, and what’s more, habitually, that they’re above the law.
It’s not about the "whole world" (sic!), and even less about "a few dozen euros" (!!!). Finally, a "procedural point" never gives "this or that right." Passenger rights in the European Union regarding air transport aren’t found in "a procedural point" but in Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council and in the case law established under it, primarily by the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Best regards
In this case, the MCT, as you say, is 60 minutes.
In Madrid, the MCT between terminals T4 and T4S was, at that time, 65 minutes. Then it was reduced to 55 minutes.
"So" isn’t the right word—there’s no causality.
??? My connection was canceled because it was shorter than the MCT.
I know that your quasi-profession here consists of suing the whole world for a few dozen euros or a procedural point that gives you this or that right.
Michel
What you call a "quasi-profession" is the fact that I don’t tolerate airlines (not the "whole world"!!!) believing, and what’s more, habitually, that they’re above the law.
It’s not about the "whole world" (sic!), and even less about "a few dozen euros" (!!!). Finally, a "procedural point" never gives "this or that right." Passenger rights in the European Union regarding air transport aren’t found in "a procedural point" but in Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council and in the case law established under it, primarily by the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Best regards
I don’t know who’s saying that boarding closes 40 minutes before the scheduled departure time, but I don’t buy it—it’s more like a good fifteen minutes, pretty much everywhere.
Michel
Hi,
Just as a simple example, Air Caraïbes:
Best regards,
Michel
Hi,
Just as a simple example, Air Caraïbes:
Best regards,
It's still 30 and not 40....
30 is the maximum I've seen, knowing that Turkish, Lufthansa, KLM, Cathay, Emirates, ANA, JAL, and the American airlines are around 20 minutes.
And in reality, you’ve seen plenty of passengers boarding well after that.
Michel
Michel
My connection was canceled because it was shorter than the MCT
Well, no, it was canceled because they had closed the gates before you could reach them.
I know your long legal texts by heart, which I’ve often skimmed before giving up. That’s great, it’s your thing, but the hassle and time we spend on it also have a cost, and you consider it negligible. To get me to write or even receive registered letters, I really need to be *very* motivated 🙂.
Michel
Well, no, it was canceled because they had closed the gates before you could reach them.
I know your long legal texts by heart, which I’ve often skimmed before giving up. That’s great, it’s your thing, but the hassle and time we spend on it also have a cost, and you consider it negligible. To get me to write or even receive registered letters, I really need to be *very* motivated 🙂.
Michel
I don’t know who’s saying that the gate closes 40 minutes before the scheduled departure time, but I don’t buy it—it’s about a good quarter of an hour, pretty much everywhere.
Michel
Hi,
Just as a simple example, Air Caraïbes:
Best regards
Thanks for the fact-checking, but I didn’t react because of the condescending tone in the message and the poster’s tendency to always want the last word. Proof is in their latest reply: “It’s 30, not 40, nanana” 😅.
Michel
Hi,
Just as a simple example, Air Caraïbes:
Best regards
Thanks for the fact-checking, but I didn’t react because of the condescending tone in the message and the poster’s tendency to always want the last word. Proof is in their latest reply: “It’s 30, not 40, nanana” 😅.
Good evening,
Even if circumstances have mostly led you to experience some of the worst airlines in this regard, you can also be open to listening to others 🙂. 40 minutes—I’d never seen that before, and even ChatGPT can’t find evidence of this practice beyond a few isolated, documented cases that stand out precisely because they’re unusual. For Etihad at its hub, the consensus in the literature is 20 minutes.
People are often scared on this site (and others, for that matter). Confidence is undermined by constantly highlighting the negatives, the risks, the dangers—everything that *might*, *could*, or *occasionally* go wrong. I find this mindset really off-putting.
Michel
Even if circumstances have mostly led you to experience some of the worst airlines in this regard, you can also be open to listening to others 🙂. 40 minutes—I’d never seen that before, and even ChatGPT can’t find evidence of this practice beyond a few isolated, documented cases that stand out precisely because they’re unusual. For Etihad at its hub, the consensus in the literature is 20 minutes.
People are often scared on this site (and others, for that matter). Confidence is undermined by constantly highlighting the negatives, the risks, the dangers—everything that *might*, *could*, or *occasionally* go wrong. I find this mindset really off-putting.
Michel
Even if circumstances have mostly made you deal with some of the worst airlines in this regard, you can still listen to others 🙂.
40 minutes—I’d never seen that before, and even ChatGPT can’t find any record of this practice beyond a few isolated, documented cases that stand out precisely because they’re so unusual.
For Etihad at its hub, the consensus is 20 minutes.
I’ve often played with connections, sometimes knowingly to get a paid stopover (which didn’t work out often). But never with just an hour, and certainly not in Abu Dhabi, given the size of the hub.
Whether it’s 20 or 40 minutes, what bothered me was your tone—“I don’t know who’s saying this” when you *do* know. Condescension or contempt, you’re not the teacher, and I’m not the student.
People are scared a lot on this site—and on others too, for that matter. We undermine their confidence by always highlighting the negatives, the risks, the dangers, everything that *might*, *could*, *perhaps* go wrong. I find that mindset unpleasant. Michel
I could agree with you on that. But if the original poster is asking the question, it’s because they have doubts. And in this case, with just an hour, I wouldn’t take the risk. That’s all I said.
PS: If there’s one medium (but is it even one?) that doesn’t have my ear, it’s definitely AI 😅
Have a good evening
I’ve often played with connections, sometimes knowingly to get a paid stopover (which didn’t work out often). But never with just an hour, and certainly not in Abu Dhabi, given the size of the hub.
Whether it’s 20 or 40 minutes, what bothered me was your tone—“I don’t know who’s saying this” when you *do* know. Condescension or contempt, you’re not the teacher, and I’m not the student.
People are scared a lot on this site—and on others too, for that matter. We undermine their confidence by always highlighting the negatives, the risks, the dangers, everything that *might*, *could*, *perhaps* go wrong. I find that mindset unpleasant. Michel
I could agree with you on that. But if the original poster is asking the question, it’s because they have doubts. And in this case, with just an hour, I wouldn’t take the risk. That’s all I said.
PS: If there’s one medium (but is it even one?) that doesn’t have my ear, it’s definitely AI 😅
Have a good evening
A lot of fear-mongering happens on this site, and others too for that matter. We undermine people’s confidence by systematically highlighting the negatives, the risks, the dangers—everything that *might*, *could*, or *occasionally* go wrong.
I disagree.
We’re not scaring people or undermining their confidence—we’re giving them objective information!
It’s honestly not helpful to promise them the moon when the path to get there isn’t guaranteed.
For some, a trip is a major investment—their savings from months or even years. It’s also limited time; not everyone is retired or financially independent. Five weeks of paid leave isn’t much if unexpected obstacles disrupt the journey.
Travelers dream for months before departure, so it’s only fair to help ensure that dream goes as smoothly as possible by avoiding the most obvious pitfalls.
The pitfalls with flights? Delays, cancellations, or missed connections. It’s also about the airline or the third-party seller where the ticket was bought.
Here’s my advice:
- Always buy your ticket directly from the airline’s website - If booking separate flights, allow at least a 24-hour buffer during layovers - Avoid tight connections, especially on the outbound trip - Never schedule anything non-refundable or expensive in the first two days - Don’t return the day before an important event (job interview, exam, etc.) - If traveling with others, split everyone’s belongings across different suitcases - Pack a change of clothes and essentials in your carry-on - Never book a low-cost airline if you can’t afford a last-minute return ticket in case of cancellation (or handle unexpected changes on your own)
It’s just common sense.
I disagree.
We’re not scaring people or undermining their confidence—we’re giving them objective information!
It’s honestly not helpful to promise them the moon when the path to get there isn’t guaranteed.
For some, a trip is a major investment—their savings from months or even years. It’s also limited time; not everyone is retired or financially independent. Five weeks of paid leave isn’t much if unexpected obstacles disrupt the journey.
Travelers dream for months before departure, so it’s only fair to help ensure that dream goes as smoothly as possible by avoiding the most obvious pitfalls.
The pitfalls with flights? Delays, cancellations, or missed connections. It’s also about the airline or the third-party seller where the ticket was bought.
Here’s my advice:
- Always buy your ticket directly from the airline’s website - If booking separate flights, allow at least a 24-hour buffer during layovers - Avoid tight connections, especially on the outbound trip - Never schedule anything non-refundable or expensive in the first two days - Don’t return the day before an important event (job interview, exam, etc.) - If traveling with others, split everyone’s belongings across different suitcases - Pack a change of clothes and essentials in your carry-on - Never book a low-cost airline if you can’t afford a last-minute return ticket in case of cancellation (or handle unexpected changes on your own)
It’s just common sense.
We’re not here to scare, we’re not here to undermine confidence—we’re just sharing information objectively!
It’s really not doing anyone any favors to promise them the moon when the path to get there isn’t guaranteed.
I’m not talking about making any promises here. This whole Etihad connection issue is just representative of a certain mindset. Objectively, since that’s the word you like, objectively, if it’s on the airline’s schedule, if it’s being sold, on routes that are sold and flown every day, then it works out fine in the vast, vast majority of cases. So, 90–95% of the time, there’s objectively no problem. Then there’s the mix of fears and the rather perverse effect of too much information. I’m often a victim of it myself: too informed to be well-informed, I end up creating problems for myself, imagining things, speculating about possible, probable, or likely situations with factors I can’t even measure. That famous "precautionary principle" has really worn down our minds and done a lot of damage to our European civilization. I agree with your list of cautious tips, but the risk itself might be acceptable—you just have to own it.
Michel
I’m not talking about making any promises here. This whole Etihad connection issue is just representative of a certain mindset. Objectively, since that’s the word you like, objectively, if it’s on the airline’s schedule, if it’s being sold, on routes that are sold and flown every day, then it works out fine in the vast, vast majority of cases. So, 90–95% of the time, there’s objectively no problem. Then there’s the mix of fears and the rather perverse effect of too much information. I’m often a victim of it myself: too informed to be well-informed, I end up creating problems for myself, imagining things, speculating about possible, probable, or likely situations with factors I can’t even measure. That famous "precautionary principle" has really worn down our minds and done a lot of damage to our European civilization. I agree with your list of cautious tips, but the risk itself might be acceptable—you just have to own it.
Michel
Log in first, then come back to this page.
You might also like
More discussions
We’re planning a trip to the Seychelles in summer 2027.
We live in Lyon and I’m looking for all possible flight options.
I’m interested in hearing from people who’ve flown from Barcelona with Emirates to Mahé (layover in Dubai).
I’m wondering how easy parking is in Barcelona and how manageable it is to fly from there with two kids aged 10 and 13.
Flights from Barcelona are cheaper than from Lyon or CDG. I’d love to hear from anyone who chose BCN with Emirates.
If you’ve got other suggestions, I’m all ears.
Thanks!
I’ll have a long layover at Beijing Airport (PEK) on December 6, 2026.
I arrive at Terminal 3 around 5:30 AM on Air China and depart at 6:15 PM, also with Air China, for an international flight.
I’d like to stay in the transit zone, without leaving the airport or going through Chinese immigration, if possible.
I’m just looking for a private room for a few hours, ideally 7-8 hours, so I can get some sleep and take a shower.
Any ideas or suggestions?
Thanks in advance for your tips!
Jean-Philippe
Hello,
On October 2, 2026, Regulation 2026/2202 of the European Parliament and Council, amending Regulation 261/2004, was published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FR/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L_202602202
This new regulation will apply from October 23, 2027. For all flights operated up to that date, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, along with all related case law, will continue to apply.
This new regulation introduces numerous improvements and clarifications, particularly by incorporating a large body of case law from the Court of Justice of the European Union. That’s why it expands from 7 pages to 45 pages. Additionally, it adds new rights. However, it remains clear and perfectly understandable, even for non-legal professionals.
But watch out for a new pitfall: passengers will have to file a claim in writing within 9 months of the flight date. If the response is negative or if there’s no response, the passenger "may file a complaint" (the wording is precise!) with the airline, under Article 15 bis of Regulation 2026/2202, within 12 months of the flight date, or within 3 months of the date of the first claim, whichever is later. Failure to meet either of these deadlines will make the claim inadmissible.
Note that Article 15 bis of Regulation 2026/2202 directly conflicts with Article 1 of Decree 2025-772, which requires referring the matter to the Tourism and Travel Ombudsman within one year.
The entry into force of this new regulation will render Decree 2025/772 obsolete, which currently requires legal action to bring a case before the court for flights operated before October 23, 2027. Unless this decree is annulled by the Council of State before that date due to ongoing appeals.
retardimportantavion.wordpress.com
Best regards,
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FR/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L_202602202
This new regulation will apply from October 23, 2027. For all flights operated up to that date, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, along with all related case law, will continue to apply.
This new regulation introduces numerous improvements and clarifications, particularly by incorporating a large body of case law from the Court of Justice of the European Union. That’s why it expands from 7 pages to 45 pages. Additionally, it adds new rights. However, it remains clear and perfectly understandable, even for non-legal professionals.
But watch out for a new pitfall: passengers will have to file a claim in writing within 9 months of the flight date. If the response is negative or if there’s no response, the passenger "may file a complaint" (the wording is precise!) with the airline, under Article 15 bis of Regulation 2026/2202, within 12 months of the flight date, or within 3 months of the date of the first claim, whichever is later. Failure to meet either of these deadlines will make the claim inadmissible.
Note that Article 15 bis of Regulation 2026/2202 directly conflicts with Article 1 of Decree 2025-772, which requires referring the matter to the Tourism and Travel Ombudsman within one year.
The entry into force of this new regulation will render Decree 2025/772 obsolete, which currently requires legal action to bring a case before the court for flights operated before October 23, 2027. Unless this decree is annulled by the Council of State before that date due to ongoing appeals.
retardimportantavion.wordpress.com
Best regards,
Hi there,
I’m planning a winter trip across India. Departing in early December and returning to France in mid-April.
My main concern is finding an airline that offers this round-trip with the fewest hassles regarding cancellations or flight schedule changes. The unstable geopolitical situation in the Middle East isn’t making this search any easier—recent reviews online about airlines from Gulf states describe quite a few struggles over the past few months.
The direct Paris-Delhi round-trip flights offered by Air France or Air India are probably the safest options, but not the cheapest!
Given this uncertainty, I’m still holding off on finalizing my ticket purchase... Maybe some of you India lovers on VoyageForum have tips or experiences to share?
Thanks, and happy travels to all.
Hi everyone,
Next January, I’m heading to India.
My outbound flight is with Emirates from Paris to Dubai, then another Emirates flight from Dubai to Calcutta.
Could anyone tell me how the connection works? I’ve heard there’s a dedicated Emirates zone, but how does it actually work in practice—I’ve got a 2-hour layover.
Thanks so much!
Take care.
Hi,
I’m thinking of heading to Malaysia soon.
I’ve seen some great prices and direct flights from Paris with Malaysia Airlines.
Is it a reliable airline?
Thanks for your feedback!
Hello,
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August. My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August. My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Hi there,
We had planned a trip to Sicily in August, and due to the volcanic eruption of Mount Etna, my flight was canceled. The airline is refunding the outbound flight, but none of the non-refundable expenses: accommodation booked through Booking, rental car, and the return flight aren’t covered. My SUPER Gold card doesn’t work in this specific case! :( If anyone has been in this situation, could you let me know if you were able to get any recourse and, if so, how?
Thanks in advance
I’ve been traveling regularly for over twenty years,
but this is the first time an airline has treated me as poorly as Air France.
Two trips, two problems. The latest:
Trip from Seoul to Rennes. Last leg from Paris CDG to Rennes with Air France.
I arrive in Paris and go straight to Air France to get my boarding pass to Rennes. They assure me my baggage is continuing to Rennes.
Arriving in Rennes, no baggage—same as five other people.
The Air France office is closed, and the airport staff tell me there’s rarely anyone there.
With the help of the airport staff, I file a claim online, and my baggage is almost immediately located. As a result, I’m told I’ll have it the next day.
Four days later, the baggage is still in the same place at CDG—nothing’s moving.
The problem is Air France has no customer service. What they call customer service is a department that takes an hour to answer and just repeats what’s on the online form. No coordination, no way to get things moving. I guess Air France would rather pay the compensation after 21 days than actually do something.
I’ve had lost baggage on other trips, but this is the first time I’ve seen such indifference and lack of professionalism.
but this is the first time an airline has treated me as poorly as Air France.
Two trips, two problems. The latest:
Trip from Seoul to Rennes. Last leg from Paris CDG to Rennes with Air France.
I arrive in Paris and go straight to Air France to get my boarding pass to Rennes. They assure me my baggage is continuing to Rennes.
Arriving in Rennes, no baggage—same as five other people.
The Air France office is closed, and the airport staff tell me there’s rarely anyone there.
With the help of the airport staff, I file a claim online, and my baggage is almost immediately located. As a result, I’m told I’ll have it the next day.
Four days later, the baggage is still in the same place at CDG—nothing’s moving.
The problem is Air France has no customer service. What they call customer service is a department that takes an hour to answer and just repeats what’s on the online form. No coordination, no way to get things moving. I guess Air France would rather pay the compensation after 21 days than actually do something.
I’ve had lost baggage on other trips, but this is the first time I’ve seen such indifference and lack of professionalism.
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi,
I booked an Etihad ticket on their website for Dusseldorf-Abu Dhabi. In the first name field, I entered all my first names (something I never do and I regret it, but the site was confusing). Everything is spelled correctly, but the problem is that I just received my new passport and only my first two first names and the first letter of the third appear—there’s no trace of the last one.
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in. Thanks for your feedback!
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in. Thanks for your feedback!
Hi there,
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon. I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport. Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…). AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly. On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double! In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others? Given the price difference, I’m hesitant… Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go? Thanks, HERVE
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon. I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport. Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…). AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly. On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double! In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others? Given the price difference, I’m hesitant… Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go? Thanks, HERVE
Hi everyone, I’ve unfortunately only just noticed that I booked two flight tickets, but I made a mistake on the second first name. Basically, my computer auto-filled and typed my first name twice, so both tickets are in my first name. Only the last names—mine and my friend’s—are correct.
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common). I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common). I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
Hello,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Hi there,
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
Hi,
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
Hi there,
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
Hi,
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
Hi,
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:
...
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:
...
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
Hello,
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
Hello,
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Hi everyone,
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
Hi there!
Has anyone taken the direct flight from CDG to Las Vegas with Air France?
Looking forward to your feedback!
Hey everyone,
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
Hi there,
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!