Bonne nouvelle pour la compagnie aérienne nationale greque OLYMPIC AIRWAYS
La compagnie ne va pas etre mise en faillite mais privatisée . En petits morceaux a plusieurs personnes ( qui?)
Tout les voles vont se derouler normalement jusqu' au 26 /03/06, lors de la création de la toute nouvelle Olympic airlines qui s'apellera Olympic Air ou Air Olympic.
Cette nouvelle compagnie cera plus petite que l' actuelle : Une diminution du personnel de - 50 % une flotte de quarante avions reduite au nombre de 30 avions Certaines destinations supprimés . Mois de vols reguliers vers certaines destinations.
Souhaitons leur beaucuop de chance !!! Vive OLYMPIC AIR / AIR OLYMPIC
Je voudrais attirer l'attention des passagers français sur l'incapacité d' Olympic Airlines à se comporter comme une compagnie décente de l'espace aérien européen.
A ma connaissance c'est la seule qui a eu la honte de louer un avion poubelle immatriculé dans un état de non droit africain pour transporter au départ de Paris des passagers, avec un retour en catastrophe à l aeroport de départ suite à problème technique majeur
Privatisée ou non quand on a le culot de faire "voler" un Tristar trentenaire affrété en Sierra Leone par une compagnie jordanienne (oui cela existe a l interieur de l'espace JAA) en toute impunité il faut que les passagers le sachent et en tiennent compte dans le choix de leur transporteur ; il s'agit de l'avion ci dessous..
Je prévois un voyage en Grece en 2006 mais certainement pas avec Olympic !!! Olympic Airlines, ou l'exotisme à pas cher...
Olympic Airlines, qui est la continuité d'Olympic Airways disparue pour cause de faillite à la mode Swissair (devenue Swiss), ne dispose pas des appareils et des personnels qui lui permettraient d'assurer son programme de vol, selon le syndicat des pilotes de la compagnie. Cette dernière est donc contrainte de recourir à la sous-traitance, un principe que l'on connaît bien en Europe.
Lundi dernier, c'est donc un Tristar (L1011) de Starjet Airways (Jordanie) qui devait assurer le vol Paris - Athènes. Après un départ retardé par quelques passagers qui refusaient de monter dans l'avion, au motif que son état ne leur inspirait pas confiance, l'affaire s'est finalement terminée par un décollage, un arrêt moteur, et un retour à la case départ, en "emergency".
C'est ainsi que Starjet Airways est passée du statut de petit sous-traitant discret (non JAA ça va de soi) à celui de "compagnie vedette" des processus JAA type "label bleu". On apprend à cette occasion qu'Olympic Airlines aurait recours à de nombreux sous-traitants exotiques : on vend un billet estampillé "Europe" par une compagnie entièrement "label bleu" et on fait faire le vol par une compagnie qui n'a rien à voir avec les règles européennes, une histoire qui rappelle étrangement notre goût pour l'exotisme islandais à Lyon...
À Athènes, et toujours selon le syndicat, ce ne serait pas moins de 350 dessertes qui auraient été ainsi sous-traitées par Olympic au cours des 4 derniers mois.
On rappelle qu'en cas d'accident (comme pour Charm el-Cheikh), l'Aviation civile grecque ne serait pas concernée, et expliquerait qu'il faut demander des comptes à l'Aviation civile jordanienne...
Est-il nécessaire de préciser que les comptes d'Olympic sont déficitaires, et que les perspectives comptables pour 2005 ne sont pas fameuses ?
Le syndicat Expa des pilotes d'Olympic a déclaré avoir transmis le dossier à la Justice.
UPDATE : Merci à Philippe pour ce lien vers la photo du Tristar avec un moteur arrêté, lors de son atterrissage à Paris.
Starjet.com Lockheed L1011-500 TriStar Philippe Noret - AirTeamImages A6-BSM The plane took off with fire coming out of the left engine. Twenty minutes later, it came back. Right engine stopped as you can see it on this picture. New reg in the database.
En compilant listes noires de plusieurs pays européens, interdictions de vol et pannes techniques, le Figaro a fini par rendre à ses lecteurs une liste qui porte mieux son nom que celle de la DGAC, peu importe les amalgames.
La direction de la compagnie aérienne, Olympic Airlines (OA), a immédiatement réagi mercredi à un article publié par le quotidien français "Le Figaro" - repris largement par la presse grecque -, dressant l'inventaire de 37 transporteurs ayant connu des incidents ces deux dernières années, et dénonçant en l'occurrence la politique de la compagnie nationale grecque en matière d'affrètement d'appareils et de personnel navigant. Face à une "liste noire" française officielle limitée à 5 noms et inutile, le Figaro a ratissé large : même la Grèce figure parmi les pays à risque !
Dans son communiqué, Olympic Airlines critique sévèrement les medias en général qu'il accuse de dresser et de publier des listes reprenant en les déformant des informations officielles des autorités de l'Aviation civile dont la fiabilité est sévèrement contrôlée. La direction d'OA annonce ainsi que ses services juridiques ont été saisis de ce dossier pour défendre la bonne réputation du transporteur national.
Le quotidien français rappelait qu'OA avait affrété cet été un avion de type Tristar à une compagnie des Emirats arabes unis, peu sûr et en provenance du Sierra Leone, et alors que l'appareil avait présenté des problèmes lors de son atterrissage à l'aéroport Charles de Gaulle à Paris.
De son côté, la Fédération des association du Service de l'Aviation civile (OSYPA) informe avoir dénoncé en temps utile l'affrètement d'appareils à des pays tiers, de telles pratiques nuisant aux compagnies aériennes grecques.
Comme annoncé par le ministre français des Transports, Dominique Perben, la semaine dernière, une "liste noire" a été publiée lundi 29 août sur le site Internet de la Direction générale de l'aviation civile (DGAC). Déception, la liste était composée de 5 compagnies qui n'existent plus sur le territoire français depuis longtemps, et qui de toute façon étant interdites, elles ne risquaient pas d'embarquer des passagers français. Autant dire que la "liste noire" était inutile pour le voyageur.
Le Figaro décide alors d'établir sa propre liste des compagnies à risques et des pays à éviter en faisant appel à des experts et surtout en s'inspirant d'un audit de l'Organisation de l'aviation civile internationale (OACI) et d'un autre effectué par les Etats-Unis. Autant dire que cela ratisse large : parmi les Etats, plus de 30% des destinations sont dangereuses du fait des carences en matière de sécurité et d'administrations défaillantes! Y figurent des états comme l'Albanie, le Mali, le Belize, la Mongolie, la Biélorussie, le Botswana, la Birmanie, l'Ouganda, mais aussi le Portugal, la Hongrie, l'Argentine, la Serbie-et-Monténégro, la Bulgarie, et bien sûr la Grèce et Chypre.
C'est dans la liste des "37 transporteurs ayant connu des défaillances" que Olympic Airways est citée : "appareil défectueux affrété à Starjet, compagnie des Emirats Arabes Unis. L'avion, un vieux Lockheed Tristar, venait du Sierra Leone, pays dont l'aviation civile est déliquescente", y lit-on. Pas de chance en plus, proximité alphabétique oblige, Olympic figure juste à côté du turc Onur Air qui au printemps dernier avait défrayé la chronique en étant interdit simultanément en France, Allemagne, Suisse et Pays-Bas.
Autre compagnie grecque à figurer dans la liste, Alexandair, qui a été interdit de vol dernièrement par l'aviation civile grecque lors d'un vol Rennes-Roissy-Héraklion.
Toutefois, dans la liste officielle de la DGAC française, Olympique Airways fait bien partie des compagnies autorisées à desservir la France. Les autres compagnies grecques autorisées sont Aegean, Alexandair et Greece Airways, ainsi que les chypriotes Cyprus Airways, Eurocypria et Helios.
kalimera, tout d'abord merci d'avoir réagi a mon article.
Ce que le figaro raconte moi j' apelle ca du cancan et de la pure jalousie !
Il est vrai que ce que OA a fait est honteux et irresponsable. Ils ont afretté un avion jugé " poubelle "
pour effectuer certains vols. Mais n'oublions pas que OA a de grand problemes financiers et a un manque d'appareils. Mais n'exagerons tout de meme pas la situation! Un atterrissage d'urgence peut arriver aussi a Air France ou a Aegean Airlines. Je trouve que classer OA parmi les plus dangereuses est une tres tres tres tres tres tres tres grande erreur car cette bonne compagnie aérienne n'a jamais connu le moindre crash depuis son existance en 1959. N'est pas AF? ( voir aout 2005 toronto, canada) . Ils etaint surement morts de honte pour AF et cherchaient a accuser une compagnie aérienne en difficulté... mon dieu quel magazine de ( excusez moi l'expression) de merde.
CHERS VOYAGEURS, NES CROYEZ PAS TROP CE MAGAZINE POUBELLE CAR OLYMPIC EST UNE BONNE COMPAGNIE AERIENNE.
ARRETONS CE CANCAN AU PLUS VITE.
PS: AVEC LA NOUVELLE OLYMPIC QUI VA OUVRIR CE GENRE DE CHOSE NE SE REPRODUIERAT PLUS.
MES SALUTATIONS A TOUS ! 🙂😉😄😏
L' info de vient pas uniquement d'un magazine "poubelle" mais d'un site professionnel de pilotes francais, en association avec le syndicat grec des pilotes de ligne ; la photo de l'avion et le détail de l'info est publiée avec l'immat du Tristar concerné ; vieux de 25 ans, ancienne machine de BWIA - Antilles ex anglaises - qui a pourri deux ans dans le desert de l' Arizona avant d'aller en Jordanie sous certificat du Sierra Leonne, faire des remplacements pour les grecs.
si cela c est pas une poubelle alors je ne sais pas quoi dire ; je présume que votre honneur national est en jeu mais de nombreux passagers ne peuvent risquer leur vie par une compagnie "européenne" irresponsable ; je persiste et signe aucun probleme financier n'excuse l'usage de tels avions, pour une compagnie africaine je comprendrais encore mais une compagnie avec un tel passé, je sais qu' Onassis est mort depuis longtemps mais OA était une compagnie de grande classe ; néanmoins elle a eu aussi quelques crashes (voir le site
http://aviation-safety.net/index.php
regardez Eurocockpit, c est le site "corporatif officieux" des pilotes de ligne syndicalistes français
le site du BEA Bureau d' Enquetes Accident français parle également de l'incident
donc tenez vous à l'écart d' Olympic si vous ne voulez pas prendre le risque d'avoir un probleme dans une poubelle africaine pourrie du meme genre que celle qui avait pris feu en France (ce fait est avéré n'est ce pas)
dates, appareil, opérateur et en gras mortalité peut mieux faire ...... ce n'est pas le zero crash mentionné par un intervenant loin de la (a rapporter à la flotte et au nombre de vols, km/passagers probablement 20 fois inférieurs à ceux du trafic d' AF)
Revoie t'es source avant de dire n'importe quoi !!! Oui Olympic a eu des crachs et puis quand même un réacteur en feu ca fait peur quand t'es assis à coté de l’aile, quand a dire qu’il est jugé poubelle ce n’est qu’un faible mot, c’est avion était interdit dans l’Europe entière et donc les dirigeants d’Olympic le savaient ca laisse songeur sur le reste...Tu veux dire un comportement délibérément gens foutre de la part de cette compagnie.
kalimera, tout d'abord merci d'avoir repondu a mon article encore une fois.
C'est vrai que j'ai fait une grande erreur en racontant tout ca. En effet, OA a aussi connu des crashs.
Je retire mes mots, ...
Mais il y a des compagnies européenes qui ne respectent pas toujours les normes de sécurité non plus encore pire que olympic.
JE VOUS EN APPORTERAI LES NOMS SI VOUS ME PROUVEZ QUE AIR FRANCE A CONNU MOINS DE CRASHs et de morts QUE OLYMPIC AIRLINES .
mais je ne retires pas tout mes mots !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 😏
Je trouve que malgré ca OA n'a rien a faire sur cette liste.
Il y a des dizaines d'autres compagnies aeriennes plus risqués qui meriterait de la remplacer sur cette liste.
Donc pour moi le FIGARO reste une poubelle .
Et ces syndicaux... ont m'a toujours dit que c'etait des fouteurs de merde, je n'y croiyait pas ... mais malheureusement ils participent a ce cancan que je juge crapuleux.
ET CELA NA RIEN A VOIR AVEC DU PATRIOTISME!
mes salutations a vous et a tous le reste des voyageurs et a bientot🙂
la norme courante dans ce domaine s'incrit en morts par km-passager, AF est dans la fourchette basse donc c est des bons ; ils ont une flotte de plus de cent avions majoritairement récents et bien entretenus et exploitent "mille" vols jours (ordre d'idée + - )
un accident comme celui de l' A340 Toronto, avec un equipage parfaitement formé et un avion quasi neuf, peut arriver à n'importe quelle compagnie majeure alors que les lacunes d' Helios - ok c est Chypre et pas la Grece je sais- entrainent droit à la cata (PNT ne parlant meme pas la meme langue, avion a problemes multiples remis en ligne à chaque fois pour faire des économies )
ceci étant pour AF ils ont une fois affreté eux aussi une poubelle en Amerique du Sud (TAM) si j'ai bonne mémoire et le 727 de collection a tapé une montagne.. le Club Med a fait la meme c..... au Senegal avec le meme résultat
cela a au moins appris aux compagnies majeures a se méfier des affretements inconsidérés.
n'utilisons pas la langue de bois et disons STOP quand certains ont des pratiques dangereuses, cela vaut aussi pour des tour operators français ou belges (ONUR AIR à Liège...)
terminons la cette controverse, mes infos étaient factuelles et avec un caractère statistique
je vais de toute façon en Grece dans quelques mois, avec AF ou LH mais pas Olympic
Tout d'abord je tiens aussi a terminer cette controverse.
Je pense que nous avons tous les deux raison.
Olympic airlines est malgré les derniers problemes et de crashs d'il y a au moin une trentaine d'années...
une bonne compagnie aérienne ! Et la nouvelle promet d'etre encore meilleur.
Mais comme je l'ai dit il y a des compagnies qui meriteraient detre a la place d'olympic, ce qui veut dire dans les premiers places de cette liste noir publié par la poubelle figaro.
Comme Fly Air, Onur Air, MNG airlines qui sont basées a istambul et que je juge d'européennes car istambul fait déja partie de l'europe. Olympic n'a jamais été interdite de vols comme Onur air et OA na pas connu de grands scandals comme fly air etc... et il y a surement encore plein de compagnies EUROPéENNES de ce genre qui meritteraint de remplacer OA sur cette liste qui vient d'une poubelle nommée figaro. Car sur les listes OFFICIELLES Hollandaise, belge et francaise je n'ai pas encore vu le terme :" olympic airlines".
Moi je part en grece le 23 /12/05 et je reviens le 06/01/06 . Je vais partir avec olympic airlines une des compagnies aeriennes les plus securisées au monde ; et je continuerait a voler avec eux.
finalement, ce sujet est clos pour moi en tout cas.
Merci d'avoir repondu a mes articles, mes commentaires et d'avoir partajé votre opinion avec moi ce fut un plaisir!!! Vive voyageforum ciao!
S'il vous plait, comme vous me semblez être un véritable expert, pourriez-vous m'indiquer une compagnie aérienne sérieuse dont moi aussi je pourrai faire la publicité pour avoir des voyages gratuits ... ?
non je ne suis surement pas un expert, je lis jour apres jour les sites spécialisés et on n'y manque pas d info
Il est plus facile de connaitre les mauvaises que les bonnes
Grosso modo toutes les compagnies US et les compagnies nationales des pays européens (15 anciens), à l'exception notable d' OA sont bonnes ; les low cost anglo-irlandaises aussi.
L'expert c est Michel446 qui a une bien plus longue expérience que moi dans ce domaine et de nombreux autres correspondants anciens PNT ou PNC en retraite ou activité, je me suis juste mis en colère contre un abus récent d'une compagnie supposée réputée et la pub que lui faisait un utilisateur du forum en recadrant le débat sur une grosse c.... de la dite compagnie, preuves écrites à l'appui
Je ne fais de pub ni pour AF ni pour Corsair ou Iberia, je leur fais juste confiance et c est le role d'un passager d'apporter ou non sa clientele a telle ou telle compagnie en se renseignant préalablement.
Bonjour!
Est-ce-que quelqu'un peut me renseigner si Oa va maitenir les vols entre Montreal et Athenes en 2008?
Merci d'avance.
b1kuby53 allias Maltchinski Felix.
Oui et non, cette compagnie est en train de faire faillite, elle vient la d'atteindre un stade critique. On connait pas grd chose sur son futur, mais ça s'annonce vraiment mal. De tte façon, ça pouvait pas durer d'avantage comme ça, elle en etait reduite à louer tout et n'importe quoi pour assurer ses vols (charters, 737 espagnols...), et surtout coute des millions à l'état grec qui ne sais plus quoi en faire...
mr le Falcon 900 sx-ECH n = est existe jamais en olympic
et calcule svp combien de mort a af et oa
pour savoir les meilleur pilote et
1 Israel
2 Greece
3 iran
4 usa
5 france
Hi there,
I’m planning a winter trip across India. Departing in early December and returning to France in mid-April.
My main concern is finding an airline that offers this round-trip with the fewest hassles regarding cancellations or flight schedule changes. The unstable geopolitical situation in the Middle East isn’t making this search any easier—recent reviews online about airlines from Gulf states describe quite a few struggles over the past few months.
The direct Paris-Delhi round-trip flights offered by Air France or Air India are probably the safest options, but not the cheapest!
Given this uncertainty, I’m still holding off on finalizing my ticket purchase... Maybe some of you India lovers on VoyageForum have tips or experiences to share?
Thanks, and happy travels to all.
Hi everyone,
Next January, I’m heading to India.
My outbound flight is with Emirates from Paris to Dubai, then another Emirates flight from Dubai to Calcutta.
Could anyone tell me how the connection works? I’ve heard there’s a dedicated Emirates zone, but how does it actually work in practice—I’ve got a 2-hour layover.
Thanks so much!
Take care.
Hi everyone,
I’m heading to Madagascar in early October to cycle from Tana to Diego along the east coast.
I really want to visit the Masoala Peninsula and its primary forest. If anyone’s interested, I’m open to company.
Maybe see you soon!
Hi,
I’m thinking of heading to Malaysia soon.
I’ve seen some great prices and direct flights from Paris with Malaysia Airlines.
Is it a reliable airline?
Thanks for your feedback!
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August.
My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Hi there,
We had planned a trip to Sicily in August, and due to the volcanic eruption of Mount Etna, my flight was canceled. The airline is refunding the outbound flight, but none of the non-refundable expenses: accommodation booked through Booking, rental car, and the return flight aren’t covered. My SUPER Gold card doesn’t work in this specific case! :( If anyone has been in this situation, could you let me know if you were able to get any recourse and, if so, how?
Thanks in advance
I’ve been traveling regularly for over twenty years,
but this is the first time an airline has treated me as poorly as Air France.
Two trips, two problems. The latest:
Trip from Seoul to Rennes. Last leg from Paris CDG to Rennes with Air France.
I arrive in Paris and go straight to Air France to get my boarding pass to Rennes. They assure me my baggage is continuing to Rennes.
Arriving in Rennes, no baggage—same as five other people.
The Air France office is closed, and the airport staff tell me there’s rarely anyone there.
With the help of the airport staff, I file a claim online, and my baggage is almost immediately located. As a result, I’m told I’ll have it the next day.
Four days later, the baggage is still in the same place at CDG—nothing’s moving.
The problem is Air France has no customer service. What they call customer service is a department that takes an hour to answer and just repeats what’s on the online form. No coordination, no way to get things moving. I guess Air France would rather pay the compensation after 21 days than actually do something.
I’ve had lost baggage on other trips, but this is the first time I’ve seen such indifference and lack of professionalism.
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi,
I booked an Etihad ticket on their website for Dusseldorf-Abu Dhabi. In the first name field, I entered all my first names (something I never do and I regret it, but the site was confusing). Everything is spelled correctly, but the problem is that I just received my new passport and only my first two first names and the first letter of the third appear—there’s no trace of the last one.
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in.
Thanks for your feedback!
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon.
I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport.
Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…).
AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly.
On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double!
In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others?
Given the price difference, I’m hesitant…
Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go?
Thanks,
HERVE
Hi everyone, I’ve unfortunately only just noticed that I booked two flight tickets, but I made a mistake on the second first name. Basically, my computer auto-filled and typed my first name twice, so both tickets are in my first name. Only the last names—mine and my friend’s—are correct.
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common).
I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows:
- Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes;
- A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late;
- Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens);
- Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight;
- If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation;
- The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason;
- In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/
Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed.
- Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps.
- Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation.
- If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/
- If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed.
- The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt.
- Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont.
- Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia.
Sincerely,
Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding.
Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage...
Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket.
On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata
On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto
I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer.
Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine.
I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket?
(It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania.
The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines.
So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers.
Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this.
Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops.
Do any of you have updates?
Thanks!
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG.
Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover?
We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker).
We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA.
For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai.
Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)?
We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one).
The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much!
I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul?
I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric