AirAsia, Nok Air ou One-Two-GO Airlines pour les vols intérieurs thaïlandais?
by Marrakech93
This discussion is in French, the community’s main language.
Original post
je voudrais savoir en terme de securite de ponctualité etc la meilleur compagnie en tre nok air air asia ou one two go
donc one two go a ne pas prendre c'est ca
j'ai pris one-two-go, tres satisfait . apres question equipement c'est vrai je ne me suis pas posé la question mais c'etait tres confortable
tu a l'habitude de prendre du low cost en thailande desolé moi je chipote grave vue que jai super peur de l'avion mais chaud c'est pour ca que je me renseigne mais grave j'avais pris l'année dernier on two go de bangkok a phuket petit avion grave mais bon pas top koi jai jamais pris nok air et air asia tu connait
Il faut prendre " Ponctuation airlines ", les hotesses enseignent l'ortographe pendant le vol 😏
ok c'est bon a savoir tu doit avoir un travail hors norme pour te permetre des reflexion comme ca c'est kool je suis content pour toi 😉
toutes se valent cependant air asia je dirais un peu devant ?
Il faut prendre " Ponctuation airlines ", les hotesses enseignent l'ortographe pendant le vol 😏
Assez d'accord lol ainsi que sur les accents (graves !)... A titre personnel je considére les lignes citées comme toutes de bonnes qualité : mais dans l'ideal notre ami pour maitriser sa peur ne devrait voyager que sur Thai Airways : il sera plus (grave) rassué mais c'est (grave) plus cher. 😉
Assez d'accord lol ainsi que sur les accents (graves !)... A titre personnel je considére les lignes citées comme toutes de bonnes qualité : mais dans l'ideal notre ami pour maitriser sa peur ne devrait voyager que sur Thai Airways : il sera plus (grave) rassué mais c'est (grave) plus cher. 😉
"Dans vos phrases, n'utilisez qu'un sujet, un verbe, un complément d"objet direct ; Quand vous aurez besoin d'un adjectif, venez me trouver." (Georges Clemenceau)
air asia et nok sont pas mal 😉
la vie c'est un voyage dési la terre nou lé ké passager ouh ouh créole en profite ton liberté
Pour les vols intérieurs, j'ai testé AirAsia et Nokair, toutes deux relativement ponctuelles et identiques au niveau sécurité.
Avantage de Nokair : vous pouvez choisir votre siège en ligne lors de la commande du billet électronique et le personnel est plus cool concernant le poids de bagages. Il ferme les yeux sur un dépassement de 2-3 kilos, ensuite 50 baths le kg. Mais un peu plus chère que AirAsia. Sur certaines lignes, il y a Nokair Plus, une sorte de business classe avec boissons et journaux et surtout 30 kgs de bagages (donc faire le calcul...)
AirAsia : places non numérotées et stricte pour le poids, à partir de 15 kgs, le prix est de 80 baths le kg.
Bon vol....😏😏😏
Diogène
« "Les mathématiciens étudient le soleil et la lune et oublient ce qu'ils ont sous les pieds"»
« "Les mathématiciens étudient le soleil et la lune et oublient ce qu'ils ont sous les pieds"»
mais en terme de securité nok air ca va les avion ne dates pas de 1800 lol voila c'est juste ce que je voulais savoir merci par ce que je compte bien prendre une des trois compagnie pour mes vol interieur en thailande
je dirai par rapport a tes criteres:
1- Nok Air (c'est la thai low cost)
2- 1-2-go
3- Air Asia (mais c'est la moins chere)
Sinon les 3 sont bien et fiables...peut etre que Air Asia peut avoir des retards sur l' horaire plus que les 2 autres mais c'est tellement aleatoire.
Khun maa jak nai krap?
"être loin d'ailleurs, c'est être ici" (P. Geluk)
"être loin d'ailleurs, c'est être ici" (P. Geluk)
ok merci pour les reponse
one two go a eu un crash ce matin .
WWW.GRANCANARIA.COM imaginez une ile !
one two go a eu un crash ce matin .
En effet, confirmation, il est actuellement 20H52 heure Thaïlande et les informations crépitent du crash du vol One to Go en se posant à Phuket !... L'avion est cassé en deux et sur 125 passagers, il y a pour le moment 61 morts...
Désolé, mais moi je prends toujours Thaï Airways car pour quelques dollars de réduction, çà ne vaut pas de mettre sa vie en jeu !...
Sincères condoléances aux familles des victimes...
En effet, confirmation, il est actuellement 20H52 heure Thaïlande et les informations crépitent du crash du vol One to Go en se posant à Phuket !... L'avion est cassé en deux et sur 125 passagers, il y a pour le moment 61 morts...
Désolé, mais moi je prends toujours Thaï Airways car pour quelques dollars de réduction, çà ne vaut pas de mettre sa vie en jeu !...
Sincères condoléances aux familles des victimes...
Uxar Le Voyageur
mon site : Uxar Carnets de Voyages : http://uxar.free.fr/
Quatre-vingt-sept personnes, dont des étrangers, ont trouvé la mort dimanche lorsqu'un avion de ligne thaïlandais s'est écrasé à l'atterrissage par mauvais temps sur l'aéroport international de Phuket, a annoncé le ministre de la Santé.
"Il y a 87 morts. Quarante trois personnes ont survécu", a indiqué le ministre de la Santé, Mongkol Na Songkhla, dans une déclaration.
Voyager, c'est ma devise...
je suis pas étonné pour one two go avec leur avion vieux et pourris 🏴☠️...mais j'ai de la peine pour les victimes ..et condoléances a leur famille 😕😕
la vie c'est un voyage dési la terre nou lé ké passager ouh ouh créole en profite ton liberté
Bonsoir,
Je comprends que les nouvelles tragiques puissent mener à des réactions comme la vôtre, mais il serait peut-être un peu rapide de conclure à la responsabilité de l'entretien ou de l'âge de l'avion, non ? 🤪
Michel
Je comprends que les nouvelles tragiques puissent mener à des réactions comme la vôtre, mais il serait peut-être un peu rapide de conclure à la responsabilité de l'entretien ou de l'âge de l'avion, non ? 🤪
Michel
"one to go" j'ai pris cette compagnie en avril 2OO7 A/R phuket/BKK la cata on nous a balader d'un aéroport à l'autre, c'est vrai pas chère comme compagnie, mais franchement pas sérieux !! on rigolait au début, mais après au bout de 5 heures de retard !!!!
Point de vue sécurité un avion vient s'écraser à PHUKET 83 morts et 42 bléssés !! pensées aux familles
Point de vue sécurité un avion vient s'écraser à PHUKET 83 morts et 42 bléssés !! pensées aux familles
L'humour suppose une forte dose de détachement et de liberté.
... Je comprends que les nouvelles tragiques puissent mener à des réactions comme la vôtre, mais il serait peut-être un peu rapide de conclure à la responsabilité de l'entretien ou de l'âge de l'avion, non ? 🤪
Michel
Eternel débat !! pour memoire tout de même les 2 principales causes des accidents aériens sont metéo et erreur humaine Alors, même si ce MD avait un age avancé, et la Cie pas obligatoirement bonne presse, plutot que de spéculer une pensée aux familles.
Eternel débat !! pour memoire tout de même les 2 principales causes des accidents aériens sont metéo et erreur humaine Alors, même si ce MD avait un age avancé, et la Cie pas obligatoirement bonne presse, plutot que de spéculer une pensée aux familles.
Bon voyage et surtout voyagez zen!
Michel France (85)
Bonsoir,
J'approuve totalement ton intervention.
C'est terrible cette façon de s'emparer de faits d'actualité, de les interpréter de manière hâtive, et de faire des procès a priori. Malheureusement cette manière de faire est légitimée par les politiques, qui en font grand usage.
Pour réfléchir et illustrer, Fontenelle, le Dent d'Or...
Fontenelle, La dent d'or (Histoire des Oracles, 1686) Assurons-nous bien du fait avant que de nous inquiéter de la cause. Il est vrai que cette méthode est bien lente pour la plupart des gens qui courent naturellement à la cause, et passent par-dessus la vérité du fait ; mais enfin nous éviterons le ridicule d'avoir trouvé la cause de ce qui n'est point. Ce malheur arriva si plaisamment sur la fin du siècle passé à quelques savants d'Allemagne que je ne puis m'empêcher d'en parler ici. En 1593, le bruit courut que les dents étant tombées à un enfant de Silésie, âgé de sept ans, il lui en était venu une d'or à la place d'une de ses grosses dents. Horstius, professeur en médecine dans l'université de Helmstadt, écrivit en 1595 l'histoire de cette dent, et prétendit qu'elle était en partie naturelle, en partie miraculeuse, et qu'elle avait été envoyée de Dieu à cet enfant, pour consoler les chrétiens affligés par les Turcs. Figurez-vous quelle consolation, et quel rapport de cette dent aux chrétiens ni au Turcs. En la même année, afin que cette dent d'or ne manquât pas d'historiens, Rullandus en écrit encore l'histoire. Deux ans après, Ingolsteterus, autre savant, écrit contre le sentiment que Rullandus avait de la dent d'or, et Rullandus fait aussitôt une belle et docte réplique. Un autre grand homme, nommé Libavius, ramasse tout ce qui avait été dit de la dent, et y ajoute son sentiment particulier. Il ne manquait autre chose à tant de beaux ouvrages, sinon qu'il fût vrai que la dent était d'or. Quand un orfèvre l'eût examinée, il se trouva que c'était une feuille d'or appliquée à la dent, avec beaucoup d'adresse ; mais on commença par faire des livres, et puis on consulta l'orfèvre. Rien n'est plus naturel que d'en faire autant sur toutes sortes de matières. Je ne suis pas si convaincu de notre ignorance par les choses qui sont, et dont la raison nous est inconnue, que par celles qui ne sont point, et dont nous trouvons la raison. Cela veut dire que, non seulement nous n'avons pas les principes qui mènent au vrai, mais que nous en avons d'autres qui s'accommodent très bien avec le faux. Michel
J'approuve totalement ton intervention.
C'est terrible cette façon de s'emparer de faits d'actualité, de les interpréter de manière hâtive, et de faire des procès a priori. Malheureusement cette manière de faire est légitimée par les politiques, qui en font grand usage.
Pour réfléchir et illustrer, Fontenelle, le Dent d'Or...
Fontenelle, La dent d'or (Histoire des Oracles, 1686) Assurons-nous bien du fait avant que de nous inquiéter de la cause. Il est vrai que cette méthode est bien lente pour la plupart des gens qui courent naturellement à la cause, et passent par-dessus la vérité du fait ; mais enfin nous éviterons le ridicule d'avoir trouvé la cause de ce qui n'est point. Ce malheur arriva si plaisamment sur la fin du siècle passé à quelques savants d'Allemagne que je ne puis m'empêcher d'en parler ici. En 1593, le bruit courut que les dents étant tombées à un enfant de Silésie, âgé de sept ans, il lui en était venu une d'or à la place d'une de ses grosses dents. Horstius, professeur en médecine dans l'université de Helmstadt, écrivit en 1595 l'histoire de cette dent, et prétendit qu'elle était en partie naturelle, en partie miraculeuse, et qu'elle avait été envoyée de Dieu à cet enfant, pour consoler les chrétiens affligés par les Turcs. Figurez-vous quelle consolation, et quel rapport de cette dent aux chrétiens ni au Turcs. En la même année, afin que cette dent d'or ne manquât pas d'historiens, Rullandus en écrit encore l'histoire. Deux ans après, Ingolsteterus, autre savant, écrit contre le sentiment que Rullandus avait de la dent d'or, et Rullandus fait aussitôt une belle et docte réplique. Un autre grand homme, nommé Libavius, ramasse tout ce qui avait été dit de la dent, et y ajoute son sentiment particulier. Il ne manquait autre chose à tant de beaux ouvrages, sinon qu'il fût vrai que la dent était d'or. Quand un orfèvre l'eût examinée, il se trouva que c'était une feuille d'or appliquée à la dent, avec beaucoup d'adresse ; mais on commença par faire des livres, et puis on consulta l'orfèvre. Rien n'est plus naturel que d'en faire autant sur toutes sortes de matières. Je ne suis pas si convaincu de notre ignorance par les choses qui sont, et dont la raison nous est inconnue, que par celles qui ne sont point, et dont nous trouvons la raison. Cela veut dire que, non seulement nous n'avons pas les principes qui mènent au vrai, mais que nous en avons d'autres qui s'accommodent très bien avec le faux. Michel
Eternel débat !! pour memoire tout de même les 2 principales causes des accidents aériens sont metéo et erreur humaine
Alors, même si ce MD avait un age avancé, et la Cie pas obligatoirement bonne presse, plutot que de spéculer une pensée aux familles.
Justement, dans l'appreciation de la dangerosité d'une compagnie le facteur humain est au moins aussi important que le matériel : formation, entrainement, mais aussi culture de la sécurité... Le manque de formation ou d'entrainement peut être critique, des cadences de travail trop soutenue peuvent l'être tout autant... Et, encore pire, une entreprise qui négligerait voire sacrifierais la sécurité au profit de la ponctualité peut mener à la catastrophe. A ce sujet je recommande le film de Enrique Pineyro: Whisky Romeo Zulu.
Une compagnie qui n'a pas les moyens de s'offrir des avions neufs aura tout autant de mal à hisser puis à maintenir ses pilotes au top niveau. Personnellement avec les compagnie "de 3eme zone" j'ai plus peur des pilotes (ou de leur management) que des avions.
Enfin rapellons qu'un crash est en général la conséquence d'un faisceau de causes, d'un concours de circonstances, et rarement le fait d'une cause unique. Donc prudence bien sur... mais les soupçons sur cette petite compagnie sont malheuresement inévitables.
Justement, dans l'appreciation de la dangerosité d'une compagnie le facteur humain est au moins aussi important que le matériel : formation, entrainement, mais aussi culture de la sécurité... Le manque de formation ou d'entrainement peut être critique, des cadences de travail trop soutenue peuvent l'être tout autant... Et, encore pire, une entreprise qui négligerait voire sacrifierais la sécurité au profit de la ponctualité peut mener à la catastrophe. A ce sujet je recommande le film de Enrique Pineyro: Whisky Romeo Zulu.
Une compagnie qui n'a pas les moyens de s'offrir des avions neufs aura tout autant de mal à hisser puis à maintenir ses pilotes au top niveau. Personnellement avec les compagnie "de 3eme zone" j'ai plus peur des pilotes (ou de leur management) que des avions.
Enfin rapellons qu'un crash est en général la conséquence d'un faisceau de causes, d'un concours de circonstances, et rarement le fait d'une cause unique. Donc prudence bien sur... mais les soupçons sur cette petite compagnie sont malheuresement inévitables.
Quelques photos de mes voyages: Bolivie, Pérou, Ladakh
Bonjour Tatra tu es exagéres Moi je suis allé en indonesie et on ne peux pas nier que garuda est sur liste noire et que les low cost asiatiques sont sujet à risques Tu ne verras pas un TO emprunter ces cies Tu ne peux pas nier que toutes les Cies que tu rejette AF thai airways singapore airline emirates etc sont plus fiables et ont des pilotes plus formés et expérimentés C'est vrai c'est pas cher mais que dire de ces pauvres gens qui ont pris one two go qui n'arrivaient déjà pas en tete du palmares de ce site J'ai dans ma famille un pilote d'AF commandant de bord d'aibus et je pourrais t'en raconter quelques unes!!!!!sur certaines Compagnies
Bonjour,
Je ne rejette rien ni personne ; je tiens seulement à ce qu'on s'assure des faits avant de juger des causes.
Michel
Je ne rejette rien ni personne ; je tiens seulement à ce qu'on s'assure des faits avant de juger des causes.
Michel
un article dans Courrier International:
http://www.courrierinternational.com/article.asp?obj_id=77567
CRASH DE PHUKET • Les "low-cost" thaïlandaises mises en cause
Au début des années 2000, la politique d'ouverture du ciel a autorisé la création d'un grand nombre de compagnies à bas coût. Mais des règles laxistes et le jeu d'hommes politiques influents ont conduit à un faible contrôle de l'aviation civile sur les nouveaux opérateurs... La question de la sécurité a été à nouveau évoquée en 2005, lorsque la compagnie à bas prix Phuket Air a été confrontée à toute une série de problèmes à la suite desquels elle a été interdite dans toute l'Europe. De graves défaillances mécaniques avaient été détectées sur ses avions.
En 2005, un article du Bangkok Post attribuait les problèmes de Phuket Air et d'autres compagnies à une application laxiste de la réglementation par le ministère des Transports et la Direction de l'aviation civile. Selon cette enquête, environ 60 % du travail des inspections annuelles d'avions est fondé sur des documents envoyés par les compagnies, et non sur une vérification directe des appareils, expliquait le quotidien.
En outre, lisait-on dans ce même article, il est arrivé que des politiques demandent aux autorités chargées de la réglementation de montrer une certaine souplesse quant aux règlements sur les inspections...
Daniel Ten Kate Asia Sentinel
http://www.courrierinternational.com/article.asp?obj_id=77567
CRASH DE PHUKET • Les "low-cost" thaïlandaises mises en cause
Au début des années 2000, la politique d'ouverture du ciel a autorisé la création d'un grand nombre de compagnies à bas coût. Mais des règles laxistes et le jeu d'hommes politiques influents ont conduit à un faible contrôle de l'aviation civile sur les nouveaux opérateurs... La question de la sécurité a été à nouveau évoquée en 2005, lorsque la compagnie à bas prix Phuket Air a été confrontée à toute une série de problèmes à la suite desquels elle a été interdite dans toute l'Europe. De graves défaillances mécaniques avaient été détectées sur ses avions.
En 2005, un article du Bangkok Post attribuait les problèmes de Phuket Air et d'autres compagnies à une application laxiste de la réglementation par le ministère des Transports et la Direction de l'aviation civile. Selon cette enquête, environ 60 % du travail des inspections annuelles d'avions est fondé sur des documents envoyés par les compagnies, et non sur une vérification directe des appareils, expliquait le quotidien.
En outre, lisait-on dans ce même article, il est arrivé que des politiques demandent aux autorités chargées de la réglementation de montrer une certaine souplesse quant aux règlements sur les inspections...
Daniel Ten Kate Asia Sentinel
photos de voyage: " https://www.flickr.com/photos/franciswalter06/albums"
Pr revenir au sujet initial, il y'a pas mal d'offres de Cies pour des vols intérieurs mais il n'y a pas que cà !
Quand vous parliez de liaisons vers le Sud (Phuket), si vous avez pas confiance en les compagnies intérieures, prenez le train ! 😉
Serieusement, il y'a des Express entre Bangkok et le Sud (Surat Thani par exemple !) c super comfort, très rapide et très abordable niveau prix (je l'ai prit il y'a 10 ans)
Bon, pr revenir aux compagnies, l'accident qu'il y'a eu est un drame, mais perso pr le cas de One Two Go, on peut se poser des questions au meme titre qu'une petite compagnie charter possédant des avions qui ne sont pas neufs et qui proposent des tarifs dérisoires sur une liaison aussi touristique que Bangkok-Phuket en septembre où le tourisme reste important (130 pax à bord apparemment !)
Je ne connais pas les causes de l'accident donc je peux pas juger mais je comprends les gens qui ont peur des compagnies comme celles-là parce-qu'il y'a des problèmes ou des accidents !! Pour les anxieux, prenez Thai Airways et vous serez ptet plus rassurés ! pour les autres, prenez One Two Go ou des compagnies équivalentes !!
Mais tout cà pour dire que l'aviation n'est pas une science exacte, et que prendre une compagnie comme One Two Go n'amène pas forcément à un drame, au meme titre que la Thai, mais ca peut faire réflechir !
Et, il n'y a pas que One Two Go comme cà ! (Je ne fais pas le procès de la Cie) mais voyager avec une Cie en connaissance de cause et ne pas le justifiez par : pr 200 EUR de +/-, je prends telle compagnie pceke c absurde mais plutôt : je prends elle pceke elle propose cà (avions récents, service, standing de la Cie, qualité) pr vous sentir tranquille de voyager avec ! C'est sur que c'est plus rassurant de savoir que l'avion est neuf, que les bagages ne seront pas perdus, que le plateau repas est bon, que le personnel est aimable, mais tout cà a forcément un cout et c forcément nous qui payont cà !!
Pr parler des trois Compagnies citées, Nok Air me semble être au-dessus des autres, s'il fallait en choisir une !!
A+
Bon, pr revenir aux compagnies, l'accident qu'il y'a eu est un drame, mais perso pr le cas de One Two Go, on peut se poser des questions au meme titre qu'une petite compagnie charter possédant des avions qui ne sont pas neufs et qui proposent des tarifs dérisoires sur une liaison aussi touristique que Bangkok-Phuket en septembre où le tourisme reste important (130 pax à bord apparemment !)
Je ne connais pas les causes de l'accident donc je peux pas juger mais je comprends les gens qui ont peur des compagnies comme celles-là parce-qu'il y'a des problèmes ou des accidents !! Pour les anxieux, prenez Thai Airways et vous serez ptet plus rassurés ! pour les autres, prenez One Two Go ou des compagnies équivalentes !!
Mais tout cà pour dire que l'aviation n'est pas une science exacte, et que prendre une compagnie comme One Two Go n'amène pas forcément à un drame, au meme titre que la Thai, mais ca peut faire réflechir !
Et, il n'y a pas que One Two Go comme cà ! (Je ne fais pas le procès de la Cie) mais voyager avec une Cie en connaissance de cause et ne pas le justifiez par : pr 200 EUR de +/-, je prends telle compagnie pceke c absurde mais plutôt : je prends elle pceke elle propose cà (avions récents, service, standing de la Cie, qualité) pr vous sentir tranquille de voyager avec ! C'est sur que c'est plus rassurant de savoir que l'avion est neuf, que les bagages ne seront pas perdus, que le plateau repas est bon, que le personnel est aimable, mais tout cà a forcément un cout et c forcément nous qui payont cà !!
Pr parler des trois Compagnies citées, Nok Air me semble être au-dessus des autres, s'il fallait en choisir une !!
A+
Bonjour,
Bien sûr, je suis d'accord, mais comment juger d'une compagnie autrement que par ce qui sera sans doute des préjugés ?.....
Je reprends vos éléments : Avions neufs ?..... Est-ce déterminant ? Je ne pense pas.... Personnel aimable ? Non plus... Bagages pas perdus ?.... C'est sur les compagnies à bas coûts qu'on les perd le moins.... Service et repas ?..... Cela ne prouve pas grand chose.......
Comment dire : je prends celle ci ou celle là car elle est dans les clous des normes administratives mieux que les autres, car elle a des pilotes mieux formés ?.... On n'en sait rien....
Michel
Bien sûr, je suis d'accord, mais comment juger d'une compagnie autrement que par ce qui sera sans doute des préjugés ?.....
Je reprends vos éléments : Avions neufs ?..... Est-ce déterminant ? Je ne pense pas.... Personnel aimable ? Non plus... Bagages pas perdus ?.... C'est sur les compagnies à bas coûts qu'on les perd le moins.... Service et repas ?..... Cela ne prouve pas grand chose.......
Comment dire : je prends celle ci ou celle là car elle est dans les clous des normes administratives mieux que les autres, car elle a des pilotes mieux formés ?.... On n'en sait rien....
Michel
Ah mais tous les éléments ne sont pas déterminants pour choisir telle ou telle Cie mais ce sont les seuls sur lequel le passager peut se baser pour choisir l'une plutôt que l'autre, avec le facteur prix ! Vous serez d'accord qu'une Cie utilisant des avions récents et bien entretenus est plus rassurante que le contraire ! Mon raisonnement ne va pas plus loin que cà !
Le pb n'est pas isolé : prenez l'exemple des navires ! Ceux qui ont des pavillons français, avec un armateur français, ... ont bcp moins de problèmes pceke ils sont strictement contrôlés par les autorités selon des règles administratives strictes ! A l'inverse, un pavillon d'un pays X avec un armateur Y et qui ne sont pas couvert par une législation stricte, présente un risque plus important de donner des accidents, ...
Les Cies aériennes, c'est exactement pareil !! Si rien ne change, des accidents comme "Flash Airlines" ou "West Carribean", il y'en aura encore et c'est vraiment malheureux ! Et je suis sur que des Cies comme celles-là volent encore au-dessus de nos têtes !
Il faut vraiment faire l'effort de savoir avec qui on voyage !
Ca m'étonne de vous, tatra, que vs citiez des arguments du style " elle a des pilotes mieux formés, ..." Pceke qui peut juger si les pilotes sont bien formés ou pas ! Je n'avancerai jamais un tel argument ! C'est tellement idiot !
Voilà
A+
Le pb n'est pas isolé : prenez l'exemple des navires ! Ceux qui ont des pavillons français, avec un armateur français, ... ont bcp moins de problèmes pceke ils sont strictement contrôlés par les autorités selon des règles administratives strictes ! A l'inverse, un pavillon d'un pays X avec un armateur Y et qui ne sont pas couvert par une législation stricte, présente un risque plus important de donner des accidents, ...
Les Cies aériennes, c'est exactement pareil !! Si rien ne change, des accidents comme "Flash Airlines" ou "West Carribean", il y'en aura encore et c'est vraiment malheureux ! Et je suis sur que des Cies comme celles-là volent encore au-dessus de nos têtes !
Il faut vraiment faire l'effort de savoir avec qui on voyage !
Ca m'étonne de vous, tatra, que vs citiez des arguments du style " elle a des pilotes mieux formés, ..." Pceke qui peut juger si les pilotes sont bien formés ou pas ! Je n'avancerai jamais un tel argument ! C'est tellement idiot !
Voilà
A+
Si vous relisez mon message vous comprendrez que je disais justement que l'on ne pouvait pas juger de la formation des pilotes, alors que ce serait d'une autre importance pour choisir que l'âge de l'avion ou le plateau repas...
Michel
Michel
Quand vous parliez de liaisons vers le Sud (Phuket), si vous avez pas confiance en les compagnies intérieures, prenez le train ! 😉
Serieusement, il y'a des Express entre Bangkok et le Sud (Surat Thani par exemple !) c super comfort, très rapide et très abordable niveau prix (je l'ai prit il y'a 10 ans)
Vi vi, je l'ai pris il y a deux ans entre Hat Yai et Bangkok, superbe expérience !
Pr parler des trois Compagnies citées, Nok Air me semble être au-dessus des autres, s'il fallait en choisir une !!
J'ai pris Nok Air entre BKK et HKT en février, je la reprend dans deux mois pour le même tronçon. Ce qui m'a décidé pour choisir Nok plutôt qu'un des nombreuses Cies opéant sur cette ligne ? ben la maintenance de leurs avions a été confiée à Air France Industrie. Lire ici Tiens, je me rend compte que je l'avais déjà dit début juillet :-)
Vi vi, je l'ai pris il y a deux ans entre Hat Yai et Bangkok, superbe expérience !
Pr parler des trois Compagnies citées, Nok Air me semble être au-dessus des autres, s'il fallait en choisir une !!
J'ai pris Nok Air entre BKK et HKT en février, je la reprend dans deux mois pour le même tronçon. Ce qui m'a décidé pour choisir Nok plutôt qu'un des nombreuses Cies opéant sur cette ligne ? ben la maintenance de leurs avions a été confiée à Air France Industrie. Lire ici Tiens, je me rend compte que je l'avais déjà dit début juillet :-)
Halte à la désinformation.
Les conseilleurs ne sont pas les payeurs.
les hotesses enseignent "l'ortographe", dommage, ce serait mieux si elles enseignaient "l'orthographe" (Ortho- Du grec ortho , droit, correct, normal, régulier.)
plus sérieusement, j'ai pris de nombreuses fois Air Asia, super compagnie et prix ridicules (pour oct-nov, j'ai un KL-Makassar pour 53€, taxes comprises, et AVEC le bus AR de LCCT jusqu'à la ville)
plus sérieusement, j'ai pris de nombreuses fois Air Asia, super compagnie et prix ridicules (pour oct-nov, j'ai un KL-Makassar pour 53€, taxes comprises, et AVEC le bus AR de LCCT jusqu'à la ville)
"Il n'y a qu'une seule chose dont vous pouvez être sûr dans la vie: Rien ne se passera jamais comme vous l'avez imaginé".Swami Prajnanpad.
Log in first, then come back to this page.
You might also like
More discussions
Great news for those heading to Bahia / Salvador toward the end of the year.
Air France plans to increase flights from 3 to 5 during the December 2026 / February 2027 period.
Original source: Salvador terá mais voos diretos para Paris durante o verão; veja o que muda | Jornal Correio 1
Tropical greetings from Salvador,
@IvanBahiaGuide
(local specialist, active on the French-speaking Brazil Forums for over 16 years now)
Hello,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi there,
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
Hi,
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
Hi there,
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
Hi,
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
Hi,
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
Hello,
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
Hello,
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Hi everyone,
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
Hi there!
Has anyone taken the direct flight from CDG to Las Vegas with Air France?
Looking forward to your feedback!
Hey everyone,
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
Hi there,
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric
Hi there,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace. It’s this model: https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
Thanks in advance! Best regards,
Hi there,
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date." See the photo. Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Best, Thierry
Hi there,
I have a question...
Has anyone managed to get a refund from Oman Air?
After a delayed flight, we missed our connecting flight to get home!! At midnight, the flight attendant booked us on a flight to Nice via Munich, even though we were in Munich and wanted to get back to Nice... Too tired from the trip, we didn’t notice the mistake!! The next day, of course, the booking wasn’t valid!! We had to pay again for the flight back to Nice... I’m really struggling!! I think they’re giving me the runaround!! I’ve sent several emails, tried Messenger and WhatsApp, but the only responses I get are: "We need to investigate!! We’ll get back to you in 15 days!!" It’s been over a month!!
I just sent a registered letter (LRAR) to their office at Paris Charles de Gaulle, which is still open!!
Do you have any other suggestions for me?
Thanks in advance for your help! Virginie
After a delayed flight, we missed our connecting flight to get home!! At midnight, the flight attendant booked us on a flight to Nice via Munich, even though we were in Munich and wanted to get back to Nice... Too tired from the trip, we didn’t notice the mistake!! The next day, of course, the booking wasn’t valid!! We had to pay again for the flight back to Nice... I’m really struggling!! I think they’re giving me the runaround!! I’ve sent several emails, tried Messenger and WhatsApp, but the only responses I get are: "We need to investigate!! We’ll get back to you in 15 days!!" It’s been over a month!!
I just sent a registered letter (LRAR) to their office at Paris Charles de Gaulle, which is still open!!
Do you have any other suggestions for me?
Thanks in advance for your help! Virginie
Hi!
Sri Lanka has announced it could run out of fuel in the coming weeks if the Strait of Hormuz remains blocked. The government has implemented a mandatory four-day workweek to save oil, and there are long lines at gas stations due to fears of an early shortage.
In Vietnam, the government has warned all airlines that flights will need to be reduced due to a lack of kerosene. The country imports two-thirds of its jet fuel from China and Thailand, but both countries have now banned exports out of fear of domestic shortages.
The state is asking airlines to plan ahead and park aircraft to drastically reduce operations, starting with domestic flights and then international ones. International carriers will also need to cut back on their rotations.
This will begin in the coming days. 🙁
Hi there,
I’ve got a long layover (about 10 hours) in Seoul on an upcoming trip.
I arrive from Phnom Penh at 7:20 AM and depart for Montreal at 6:00 PM.
First question: Will my checked baggage be transferred automatically? I have a single ticket from KTI to YUL (Air Canada ticket—KTI-ICN operated by Asiana (codeshare) and ICN-YUL by Air Canada).
Second question: I saw it’s possible to join free guided tours (Airport Transit Tour). What do you think of this kind of service? And is my "actual" layover time (accounting for security checks, check-in, etc.) enough to do one of these tours?
Thanks in advance to everyone who chimes in on this!
First question: Will my checked baggage be transferred automatically? I have a single ticket from KTI to YUL (Air Canada ticket—KTI-ICN operated by Asiana (codeshare) and ICN-YUL by Air Canada).
Second question: I saw it’s possible to join free guided tours (Airport Transit Tour). What do you think of this kind of service? And is my "actual" layover time (accounting for security checks, check-in, etc.) enough to do one of these tours?
Thanks in advance to everyone who chimes in on this!
Hi everyone,
I'm heading to Namibia next May. I'm planning to take a first flight from Paris to Johannesburg with Air France, departing at 11:20 PM and arriving at 11:05 AM in Johannesburg. Then a second flight from Johannesburg to Windhoek at 3:25 PM with South African Airways.
Four hours between the two flights seems enough to catch my connection, but a friend told me I should maybe take the 5:30 PM flight instead because I need to go through immigration, collect my luggage, and check in again. Apparently, I have to do this because I bought the two tickets separately (it's actually much cheaper).
What do you think?
Also, in terms of South African airlines, which one do you think is the most reliable between South African Airways and Airlink?
Thanks for your advice!!
So, even before starting my explanation, I’d like to introduce myself since this is my first post on the forum :) I’m Jérôme, a huge Asia enthusiast, and I’m currently in the process of moving to Japan with my family in 2028.
Now, onto the topic :)
We’re a family of four traveling together to Seoul, with two separate bookings.
Our original itinerary was: Madrid → Doha → Seoul (March 23–24)
The issue is that our entire outbound flight was canceled, and the airline simply rescheduled the Madrid → Doha leg. Now we’re left with an incomplete journey, with no solution to reach our final destination (Seoul).
Since then:
- Can’t modify flights online (technical error every time) - Can’t get help via chat or WhatsApp - Phone support is unreachable, and the usual French number isn’t working right now
We don’t want a refund. We just want to be rerouted to Seoul, as our original ticket promised.
We’re flexible:
- On dates (we can leave on March 21 or 22 instead of the 23rd) - On the itinerary (different layovers if needed)
Have any of you dealt with this before? Do you know how to unlock a booking in this case or get a rerouting? We’re considering going straight to the airport to resolve it at the Qatar Airways counter....
Thanks so much for your help! 😊
Now, onto the topic :)
We’re a family of four traveling together to Seoul, with two separate bookings.
Our original itinerary was: Madrid → Doha → Seoul (March 23–24)
The issue is that our entire outbound flight was canceled, and the airline simply rescheduled the Madrid → Doha leg. Now we’re left with an incomplete journey, with no solution to reach our final destination (Seoul).
Since then:
- Can’t modify flights online (technical error every time) - Can’t get help via chat or WhatsApp - Phone support is unreachable, and the usual French number isn’t working right now
We don’t want a refund. We just want to be rerouted to Seoul, as our original ticket promised.
We’re flexible:
- On dates (we can leave on March 21 or 22 instead of the 23rd) - On the itinerary (different layovers if needed)
Have any of you dealt with this before? Do you know how to unlock a booking in this case or get a rerouting? We’re considering going straight to the airport to resolve it at the Qatar Airways counter....
Thanks so much for your help! 😊
Hi,
We just received an email from Volotea saying our flight time has changed (by more than 2 hours).
The email states "you can request a free date change."
If I change the date, will the flight price stay the same as the original price, or will I have to pay the difference?
Specifically: Our flight on the 7th is 46.25 €, and the one on the 8th is 92.51 €. If we switch to the 8th, how much will we pay?
When I request the date change to the 8th, it says "No additional fees."
Thanks and have a great day! 🙂
Hi everyone,
We’re going on a Nile cruise.
My question:
We’re taking off from Brussels Airport to land in Cairo.
Then we have to catch a second flight to Luxor.
How does that work—do we pick up our luggage, do we have to exit and then re-enter the airport?
Thanks for your help, tips, and advice, etc.…







