L'Inde?

Salut Douya , et tous les autre VFnautes !!!Pour tous ceux que ça intéresse...Remontons le cours de l'histoire, jusqu'il y a 4000 ans environ, lors de la première vague des invasions Indo-Européennes. Ces invasions ont eu diverses incidences dans la région, que l'on ressent jusqu'à nos jours. Lors de leur installation dans la vallée de l'Indus, ces grands hommes blonds (ce n'est pas une légende, car on a trouvé de nombreuses tombes attestant de la grande taille de ces hommes soit 1.80 m, et comme l'on a trouvé des tombes dans des régions plus désertiques comme le Pamir et jusqu'aux abords du Taklamakan, l'on a pu attester de leur chevelure blonde) ont tout d'abord occasionné l'expulsion d'une partie de la population. Ce sont les Tziganes et les Gitans qui, originaires du delta de l'Indus, nomadisent depuis cette époque à travers l'Europe. Ils ont également importé leur langue qui a engendré le Perse et l'Urdu. Pour le sujet qui nous intéresse, celui des castes, ces nouveaux arrivants ont voulu asseoir politiquement leur pouvoir et le pérenniser. Ils ont choisi la voie religieuse, afin d'imposer leur autorité. Celle ci ne supporte aucune contestation possible, puisqu'elle émane de la volonté divine. De plus le système de caste, rigide, évite toute forme de mixité sociale et ce, dans la durée. La caste supérieure, celle des Brahmanes est donc exclusivement réservée aux nouveaux envahisseurs. Ils dispensent la volonté des Dieux, puisqu'ils cumulent le pouvoir militaire, politique et religieux. Aux envahis de se partager les castes inférieures. Pour les anciens dirigeants déchus, la caste en dessous de celle des Brahmanes etc... jusqu'aux intouchables. Pas d'éxogamie, donc pas de possibilité d'évoluer d'une caste à l'autre... de son vivant. Depuis 4000 ans ce système perdure, jusqu'à nos jours. Le constat est facilement visible même pour un non averti, car la caste supérieure est restée blanche, et les dravidiens continuent à se partager les castes inférieures, car ce système social offre malgré tout l'espoir d'une vie meilleure, mais uniquement lors de la réincarnation. Un intouchable, s'il cumule suffisament de chacras de son vivant peut espérer s'élever aux castes supérieures, après sa mort. C'est là que le génie machiavélique de ces guerriers d'il y a 4000 ans prend toute son envergure, car toute la société indienne s'est contentée de ce système jusqu'à la confrontation de la "philosophie des lumières" occidentale, qui ne parvient que difficilement à l'égratigner. Les croyances sont pugnaces pour les hommes qui manquent de culture, de référents et de rétorique. Et même Gandhi qui possédait toutes ces qualités n'a pas pu faire évoluer cet état de fait. A suivre... dans le bon sens j'espère...@ +Beub

Consequences of the Aryan Invasion Theory in Context of India
* It serves to divide artificially India into a northern Aryan and southern Dravidian culture which were made hostile to each other by various interested parties: A major source of social tension in south Indian states.
* It gave an easy excuse to the Britishers to justify their conquest over India as well as validating the various conquests and mayhems of invading armies of religious fanatics from Arab lands and central Asia. The argument goes that they were doing only what Aryan ancestors of the Hindus had previously done millennia ago to the indigenous population.
* As a corollary, the theory makes Vedic culture later than and possibly derived from Middle Eastern cultures, especially the Greek culture: An absurd proposition.
* Since the identification of Christianity and the Middle Eastern cultures, the Hindu religion and Indian civilization are considered as a sidelight to the development of religion and civilization in the west: A deliberate and dishonest undermining of the antiquity and the greatness of the ancient Indian culture.
* It allows the science of India to be given a Greek basis, as any Vedic basis was largely disqualified by the primitive nature of the Vedic culture: In fact the opposite is true.
* If the theory of Aryan invasion and its proposed period were true, this discredited not only the Vedas but the genealogies of the Puranas, and all the kings mentioned in these scriptures including Lord Krishna, Rama, Buddha etc. would become as fictional characters with no historical basis: Which simply means disowning and discarding the very basis and raison de'etre of the Hindu civilization.
* The Mahabharat, instead of being a civil war of global proportion in which all the main kings of India participated as is described in the epic, would be dismissed as a local skirmish among petty princes that was later exaggerated by poets.
* In other words, the Aryan Invasion Theory invalidates and discredits the most Hindu traditions and almost all its vast and rich literary and civilizational heritage. It turns its scriptures and sages into fantasies and exaggerations.
* On the basis of this theory, the propaganda by the Macaulayists was made that there was nothing great in the Hindu culture and their ancestors and sages. And most Hindus fell for this devious plan. It made Hindus feel ashamed of their culture - that its basis was neither historical nor scientific, the Vedas were the work of nomadic shepherds and not the divine revelations or eternal truth perceived by the rishis during their spiritual journey, and hence there is nothing to feel proud about India's past, nothing to be proud of being Hindu.Conclusion
So, What are the facts?
Now, based on what has been presented above, following facts about an ancient and glorious period of India clearly emerge:
1. The Aryan Invasion and Racial theories, and Aryan-Dravidian conflicts are a 19th century fabrication by some European scholar. They are being exploited even now for political reasons.
2. The hymns of Rigveda had been composed and completed by 3700BC, this can be scientifically proved.
3. The language of the Indus script is related to Sanskrit, the language of Vedas.
4. The Indus valley civilization should be aptly called as Saraswati Vedic civilization, as the new evidences and right interpretation of the archaeological findings indicate.
5. There is now strong evidence that the movement of the ancient Aryan people was from east to west, and this is how the European languages have strong association and origin in the Vedic Sanskrit language.
6. The ending of Indus Valley and the Saraswati civilization was due to the constant floods and drought in the Indus area and the drying up of the Saraswati river. This had caused a massive emigration of the habitants to safer and interior areas of the Indian subcontinent and even towards the west.
7. There was no destruction of the civilization in the Indus valley due to any invasion of any barbaric hordes.
8. The Vedic literature has no mention of any invasion or destruction of a civilization.
9. There is no evidence in any of the literature which indicate any Aryan-Dravidian or North-South divide, they were never culturally hostile to each other.
10. The population living in the Indus valley and surrounding the dried up Saraswati river practiced the Vedic culture and religion.

D'apres tous les témoignages c'est tres dur de trouevr des endroits de calme, pas surpeuplés, ou des endroits de nature préservés.Est-ce vrai ?A priori 1 milliard d'habitant dans un territoire certes grand mais pas tant que ça, ça fait peur...