Grève des contrôleurs aériens en France du 23 au 27 février
by Slasherfun
This discussion is in French, the community’s main language.
???????????
C'est l'heure du pot au Québec ?
C'est l'heure du pot au Québec ?
Et elle a l'air bonne... fait tourner !
LOL !
Tu m'fais goûter?🙂
LOL !
Tu m'fais goûter?🙂
Hé bé , ta moquette doit être trop forte , MDR . 😏😏😏😏😏
@+ , Marco .
On aura jamais assez de temps pour tout ce qu'on veut découvrir et comprendre dans nos voyages qu'on se le dise , Amis voyageurs .
Petite question au spécialiste :
J'ai été prévenu ce soir d'une annulation de mon vol (domestique) demain. Je vais aller demander à l'agence AF locale un rerouting demain matin. Que puis je esperer ? - pouvoir prolonger mon séjour avec un départ le samedi (sachant que je devais prendre le dernier vol du vendredi et le vol non annulé précédent est un peu trop tot à mon gout) - un rerouting sur TGV sachant que ce n'est qu'un vol pour ORY donc pas de continuation. Ce qui m'arrangerait en évitant des transferts ville aéroports...
Sachant que je ne suis que FB Ivory, en classe X, je ne pense pas etre utlra prioritaire pour etre rerouté, ce qui ne me déplait pas dans le cas précis ! Merci d'avance !
J'ai été prévenu ce soir d'une annulation de mon vol (domestique) demain. Je vais aller demander à l'agence AF locale un rerouting demain matin. Que puis je esperer ? - pouvoir prolonger mon séjour avec un départ le samedi (sachant que je devais prendre le dernier vol du vendredi et le vol non annulé précédent est un peu trop tot à mon gout) - un rerouting sur TGV sachant que ce n'est qu'un vol pour ORY donc pas de continuation. Ce qui m'arrangerait en évitant des transferts ville aéroports...
Sachant que je ne suis que FB Ivory, en classe X, je ne pense pas etre utlra prioritaire pour etre rerouté, ce qui ne me déplait pas dans le cas précis ! Merci d'avance !
Je ne connais pas les recommandations qu'AF a communiqué à ses agents de vente sur ce point, donc je laisserai les experts AF répondre à ça 🙂
Contributions CC BY-SA
J'ai été prévenu ce soir d'une annulation de mon vol (domestique) demain. Je vais aller demander à l'agence AF locale un rerouting demain matin. Que puis je esperer ?
- pouvoir prolonger mon séjour avec un départ le samedi (sachant que je devais prendre le dernier vol du vendredi et le vol non annulé précédent est un peu trop tot à mon gout)
Oui, dans la limite des places disponibles (éventuellement: liste d'attente)
- un rerouting sur TGV sachant que ce n'est qu'un vol pour ORY donc pas de continuation. Ce qui m'arrangerait en évitant des transferts ville aéroports...
Non: TGV Air est réservé aux passagers ayant une correspondance à CDG. C'est une limitation qui n'est pas du fait d'AF mais qui lui est imposée, donc AF ne peut pas faire d'exception même si elle le désirait.
Et si le report proposé ne convient pas (trop éloigné dans le temps), il est possible d'annuler et de se faire rembourser le retour, conformément au Règlement Européen.
Oui, dans la limite des places disponibles (éventuellement: liste d'attente)
- un rerouting sur TGV sachant que ce n'est qu'un vol pour ORY donc pas de continuation. Ce qui m'arrangerait en évitant des transferts ville aéroports...
Non: TGV Air est réservé aux passagers ayant une correspondance à CDG. C'est une limitation qui n'est pas du fait d'AF mais qui lui est imposée, donc AF ne peut pas faire d'exception même si elle le désirait.
Et si le report proposé ne convient pas (trop éloigné dans le temps), il est possible d'annuler et de se faire rembourser le retour, conformément au Règlement Européen.
Quelques photos de mes voyages: Bolivie, Pérou, Ladakh
Je peux vous dire que mon mari était ravi d'avoir prévu un départ (pour l'Italie) lundi de Francfort plutôt que de Strasbourg : il y avait grève des pilotes de Lufthansa (de lundi à jeudi mais ils l'ont arrêtée lundi soir) mais dès qu'il l'a su il a appelé et Lufthansa a décalé son vol à dimanche soir, et tout s'est passé sans anicroche...
Albathor, je veux bien qu'Air France n'ait légalement pas d'obligation vis-à-vis des passagers restés en rade, mais d'un point de vue commercial et même humain, n'était-il pas plus judicieux de remplir les vols qui partaient? Cela n'aurait pas dépanné tout le monde certes, mais cela aurait dépanné quelques personnes, et aurait évité une image désastreuse de plus, celle d'avions partant à moitié pleins en laissant des passagers derrière... Merci en tous cas d'avoir eu le courage de venir sur ce sujet!
Albathor, je veux bien qu'Air France n'ait légalement pas d'obligation vis-à-vis des passagers restés en rade, mais d'un point de vue commercial et même humain, n'était-il pas plus judicieux de remplir les vols qui partaient? Cela n'aurait pas dépanné tout le monde certes, mais cela aurait dépanné quelques personnes, et aurait évité une image désastreuse de plus, celle d'avions partant à moitié pleins en laissant des passagers derrière... Merci en tous cas d'avoir eu le courage de venir sur ce sujet!
bonjour,
Je suis actuellement dans le vol FR2133 GNB-STN, depuis 40 minutes en standby sur le tarmac de GNB, nous ne partirons pas avant 1h20. Sachant qu'en plus l'embarquement s'est fait avec 1h de retard. Le retard initial est donc de 3h dans le meilleur des cas, imputable à cette grève scandaleuse.
Suis-je en droit de revendiquer quoi que ce soit?
Cordialement,
Un
Suis-je en droit de revendiquer quoi que ce soit?
Cordialement,
Un
Revendiquer, ça, sans problème. Obtenir, légalement rien n'est prévu.
Contributions CC BY-SA
Albathor, je veux bien qu'Air France n'ait légalement pas d'obligation vis-à-vis des passagers restés en rade, mais d'un point de vue commercial et même humain, n'était-il pas plus judicieux de remplir les vols qui partaient? Cela n'aurait pas dépanné tout le monde certes, mais cela aurait dépanné quelques personnes, et aurait évité une image désastreuse de plus, celle d'avions partant à moitié pleins en laissant des passagers derrière... Merci en tous cas d'avoir eu le courage de venir sur ce sujet!
Dans les cas de grèves de contrôleurs, il faut comprendre qu'il est impossible pour une compagnie aérienne de définir une stratégie claire. En effet, les grèves des contrôleurs ont ceci de terrible, qu'elles s'apparentent plus à du sabotage qu'à un mouvement social. Les contrôleurs qui ne sont pas en grève ou sont réquisitionnés ont trouvé une parade et font fleurir des créneaux de décollage à tour de bras, d'une heure, 2 heures, 3 ou 4 heures parfois. Et les infos dont disposent les pilotes et la compagnie sont bien souvent remises en cause toutes les 10 minutes. Il m'est arrivé de faire embarquer les pax pour un vol, constatant une soudaine amélioration du créneau indigent qu'on nous avait imposé, puis 10 minutes après, de constater qu'un nouveau créneau de ... 7 heures nous était destiné. Vol annulé par la compagnie alors que les passagers étaient dans l'avion.
NE PAS SE TROMPER DE CIBLE !! Les compagnies sont les victimes de ces grèves-sabotage.
Dans les cas de grèves de contrôleurs, il faut comprendre qu'il est impossible pour une compagnie aérienne de définir une stratégie claire. En effet, les grèves des contrôleurs ont ceci de terrible, qu'elles s'apparentent plus à du sabotage qu'à un mouvement social. Les contrôleurs qui ne sont pas en grève ou sont réquisitionnés ont trouvé une parade et font fleurir des créneaux de décollage à tour de bras, d'une heure, 2 heures, 3 ou 4 heures parfois. Et les infos dont disposent les pilotes et la compagnie sont bien souvent remises en cause toutes les 10 minutes. Il m'est arrivé de faire embarquer les pax pour un vol, constatant une soudaine amélioration du créneau indigent qu'on nous avait imposé, puis 10 minutes après, de constater qu'un nouveau créneau de ... 7 heures nous était destiné. Vol annulé par la compagnie alors que les passagers étaient dans l'avion.
NE PAS SE TROMPER DE CIBLE !! Les compagnies sont les victimes de ces grèves-sabotage.
Vous voulez dire que rien n'est prévu par personne pour indemniser les passagers victimes de ce retard? (Je suis conscient que les compagnies en sont aussi victimes).
Ça j'ignorais. Effectivement cela empêche de caser quelques passagers sur un vol qui doit partir effectivement, puisqu'il n'y en a pas...
J'ai beau avoir deux amies contrôleurs aériens, je trouve cela scandaleux.
Je pense que le contrôle aérien en France en est au point où il faudrait une réelle intervention d'autorité, pour que les contrôleurs aient un planning décent et pas trop fatigant, donc plus d'heures plus sûres, et des augmentations dès que la "surpopulation" aurait été absorbée (avec ou sans reclassements); le tout assorti d'obligations dont l'inaccomplissement serait réellement sanctionné.
@mottoth
Oui, dans la limite des places disponibles (éventuellement: liste d'attente)
Bonjour, rerouté samedi sur le vol de mon choix. Efficacité des agences AF. Ca faisait depuis l'introduction de la tarification différenciée selon le mode de reservation que je n'avais pas remis les pieds dans une agence. C'est dommage car l'accueil et les conseils sont de bonnes qualités.
Non: TGV Air est réservé aux passagers ayant une correspondance à CDG
Je ne pensais pas au TGV Air, mais au TGV tout court, en clair qu'AF t'achemines par le train. Mais il m'a été confirmé qu'aucun accord n'existait. Par contre pouvais avoir un remboursement de mon billet si je voulais prendre le train à mes frais.
@ThoRi
tout s'est passé sans anicroche...
Anticiper son départ avant la greve si il reste des places de libres est effectivement le plus judicieux lorsqu'on le peut !!
@Safranrouge
imputable à cette grève scandaleuse.
Ils défendent simplement leur emploi. Le gouvernement refuse de leur donner des garanties. Ils vont passer d'une administration à une société, c'est normal qu'ils soient inquiets.
Suis-je en droit de revendiquer quoi que ce soit?
L'interdiction du droit de grève ? Hélas pour toi le droit de grève est constitutionnel en France, nous ne sommes pas dans un Etat totalitaire !
@albathor
NE PAS SE TROMPER DE CIBLE !! Les compagnies sont les victimes de ces grèves-sabotage.
Sur CDG le trafic semble être relativement normal ces jours ci... Il est évident que quelqu'un de réquisitionné va trainer des pieds pour travailler !!
@ThoRi
Je pense que le contrôle aérien en France en est au point où il faudrait une réelle intervention d'autorité,
Le plus simple ne serait il pas que le gouvernement arrête sa politique haineuse et méprisante envers les fonctionnaires ? Ceux ci sont considérés comme les responsables de la crise et de la situation financière de notre pays !
Oui, dans la limite des places disponibles (éventuellement: liste d'attente)
Bonjour, rerouté samedi sur le vol de mon choix. Efficacité des agences AF. Ca faisait depuis l'introduction de la tarification différenciée selon le mode de reservation que je n'avais pas remis les pieds dans une agence. C'est dommage car l'accueil et les conseils sont de bonnes qualités.
Non: TGV Air est réservé aux passagers ayant une correspondance à CDG
Je ne pensais pas au TGV Air, mais au TGV tout court, en clair qu'AF t'achemines par le train. Mais il m'a été confirmé qu'aucun accord n'existait. Par contre pouvais avoir un remboursement de mon billet si je voulais prendre le train à mes frais.
@ThoRi
tout s'est passé sans anicroche...
Anticiper son départ avant la greve si il reste des places de libres est effectivement le plus judicieux lorsqu'on le peut !!
@Safranrouge
imputable à cette grève scandaleuse.
Ils défendent simplement leur emploi. Le gouvernement refuse de leur donner des garanties. Ils vont passer d'une administration à une société, c'est normal qu'ils soient inquiets.
Suis-je en droit de revendiquer quoi que ce soit?
L'interdiction du droit de grève ? Hélas pour toi le droit de grève est constitutionnel en France, nous ne sommes pas dans un Etat totalitaire !
@albathor
NE PAS SE TROMPER DE CIBLE !! Les compagnies sont les victimes de ces grèves-sabotage.
Sur CDG le trafic semble être relativement normal ces jours ci... Il est évident que quelqu'un de réquisitionné va trainer des pieds pour travailler !!
@ThoRi
Je pense que le contrôle aérien en France en est au point où il faudrait une réelle intervention d'autorité,
Le plus simple ne serait il pas que le gouvernement arrête sa politique haineuse et méprisante envers les fonctionnaires ? Ceux ci sont considérés comme les responsables de la crise et de la situation financière de notre pays !
Bonjour,
en France cela est devenu un "non information", tellement nous sommes habitués.

et c'est pour ca qu'on préfèrera toujours partir de Bruxelles ou autre que Paris pour des LC !! Quand c'est pas les contrôleurs, c'est AF, quand c'est pas AF, c'est la sécurité, quand c'est pas la sécurité c'est les bagagistes... Et les périodes de vacances c'est tellement mieux... Le plus risqué : un vol AF au départ de Paris avec préacheminement TGV...
en France cela est devenu un "non information", tellement nous sommes habitués.


et c'est pour ca qu'on préfèrera toujours partir de Bruxelles ou autre que Paris pour des LC !! Quand c'est pas les contrôleurs, c'est AF, quand c'est pas AF, c'est la sécurité, quand c'est pas la sécurité c'est les bagagistes... Et les périodes de vacances c'est tellement mieux... Le plus risqué : un vol AF au départ de Paris avec préacheminement TGV...
Maison à louer à Moab : http://voyageforum.com/discussion/loue-maison-moab-3-chambres-piscine-jaccuzzi-d6633799/
Carnets de voyage (Colorado, Wyoming, Dakota du Sud / Ouest canadien / Moab / Afrique du Sud) : voir profil
Carnets de voyage (Colorado, Wyoming, Dakota du Sud / Ouest canadien / Moab / Afrique du Sud) : voir profil
Le plus simple ne serait il pas que le gouvernement arrête sa politique haineuse et méprisante envers les fonctionnaires ? Ceux ci sont considérés comme les responsables de la crise et de la situation financière de notre pays !
Dans le cas du contrôle aérien en France, le principal responsable, ce n'est pas le gouvernement (même si c'est vrai qu'ils devraient mieux gérer ADP, les comparaisons internationales ne plaident pas en sa faveur), ce sont encore moins les fonctionnaires, ce sont des syndicats irresponsables qui jouent leur propre jeu sans souci des fonctionnaires ni du bien commun. Le totalitarisme, je le vois plus dans le numerus clausus des syndicats (théoriquement c'était, 1) pour sanctionner les collabos après la guerre, 2) pour limiter le risque de syndicats "jaunes") qui a amené à des organismes ne vivant que pour eux-mêmes, ce depuis des décennies (je sais bien qu'il y a aussi des délégués syndicaux formidables!); que dans une interdiction sinon de la grève (pas de droit de grève = esclavage), du moins de ce qu'Albathor appelle, à mon avis à raison, un sabotage.
Dans le cas du contrôle aérien en France, le principal responsable, ce n'est pas le gouvernement (même si c'est vrai qu'ils devraient mieux gérer ADP, les comparaisons internationales ne plaident pas en sa faveur), ce sont encore moins les fonctionnaires, ce sont des syndicats irresponsables qui jouent leur propre jeu sans souci des fonctionnaires ni du bien commun. Le totalitarisme, je le vois plus dans le numerus clausus des syndicats (théoriquement c'était, 1) pour sanctionner les collabos après la guerre, 2) pour limiter le risque de syndicats "jaunes") qui a amené à des organismes ne vivant que pour eux-mêmes, ce depuis des décennies (je sais bien qu'il y a aussi des délégués syndicaux formidables!); que dans une interdiction sinon de la grève (pas de droit de grève = esclavage), du moins de ce qu'Albathor appelle, à mon avis à raison, un sabotage.
Dans le cas du contrôle aérien en France, le principal responsable, ce n'est pas le gouvernement
Certes. Mais quand le gouvernement veut casser le statut de ses employés pour les envoyer dans la précarité, n'est il pas anormal qu'ils se défendent ? Surtout que ce n'est pas la premiere attaque de ce genre envers les fonctionnaires !
Certes. Mais quand le gouvernement veut casser le statut de ses employés pour les envoyer dans la précarité, n'est il pas anormal qu'ils se défendent ? Surtout que ce n'est pas la premiere attaque de ce genre envers les fonctionnaires !
Certes. Mais quand le gouvernement veut casser le statut de ses employés pour les envoyer dans la précarité, n'est il pas anormal qu'ils se défendent ? Surtout que ce n'est pas la premiere attaque de ce genre envers les fonctionnaires !
Comme tu y vas ! Il s'agit de moderniser le contrôle aérien français en l'intégrant dans une plate-forme européenne, avec garantie totale du statut actuel.
Je ne pense pas qu'on puisse dire "casser le statut".
Comme tu y vas ! Il s'agit de moderniser le contrôle aérien français en l'intégrant dans une plate-forme européenne, avec garantie totale du statut actuel.
Je ne pense pas qu'on puisse dire "casser le statut".
Alors pourquoi changer le statut de la DGAC pour passer d une administration en EPIC ? Est ce necessaire pour moderniser le controle ?
La principale revendication des controleurs est une garantie par ecrit du statut. Ce que refuse le gouvernement. Si leur statut n est pas en cause, alors pourquoi refuser de le leur garantir ?
Je sais bien que vous etes penalises par la greve, mais le gouvernement actuel ne laisse pas d autre choix aux controleurs que de se defendre ainsi !
Dans toutes les administrations on assiste a la meme casse sociale, sans parler des propos meprisant du ministre de la fonction publique recemment !
La principale revendication des controleurs est une garantie par ecrit du statut. Ce que refuse le gouvernement. Si leur statut n est pas en cause, alors pourquoi refuser de le leur garantir ?
Je sais bien que vous etes penalises par la greve, mais le gouvernement actuel ne laisse pas d autre choix aux controleurs que de se defendre ainsi !
Dans toutes les administrations on assiste a la meme casse sociale, sans parler des propos meprisant du ministre de la fonction publique recemment !
Ils défendent simplement leur emploi. Le gouvernement refuse de leur donner des garanties. Ils vont passer d'une administration à une société, c'est normal qu'ils soient inquiets.
Et comment expliquez vous qu'AUCUN syndicats des autres pays concernés n'appellent à la gréve pour la création de ce ciel Européen?
Je veux bien qu'on deffende le droit de grève mais à force de manifester pour des raisons non valable on décrédibilise l'ensemble des manifestations et on crée chez les Français un sentiment de lassitude face à ces grèves (sans oublier l'image desastreuse de la France à l'étranger).
Et comment expliquez vous qu'AUCUN syndicats des autres pays concernés n'appellent à la gréve pour la création de ce ciel Européen?
Je veux bien qu'on deffende le droit de grève mais à force de manifester pour des raisons non valable on décrédibilise l'ensemble des manifestations et on crée chez les Français un sentiment de lassitude face à ces grèves (sans oublier l'image desastreuse de la France à l'étranger).
Mes vidéos de vols sur Vimeo
Ma carte de voyage sur Openflights
En plus de l'emploi, ils defendent pas mal de privileges
http://www.ifrap.org/Direction-Generale-de-l-Aviation-Civile,0480.html?numpage=2
http://www.ifrap.org/Direction-Generale-de-l-Aviation-Civile,0480.html?numpage=2
Chercheur d'or en Australie
http://voyageforum.com/voyage/gold_prospecting_un_froggy_chercheur_or_en_australie_D2438548/
Peut etre parce qu'aucun pays européen n'en profite pour casser le statut des agents concernés dans le sens de la régression sociale !
Les controleurs sont sans doute les derniers fonctionnaires qu'on peu plaindre.
Les controleurs sont sans doute les derniers fonctionnaires qu'on peu plaindre.
Mes vidéos de vols sur Vimeo
Ma carte de voyage sur Openflights
La Grèce et l'Italie ont fait grève dernièrement.
Mais pas pour cette raison.
Mais pas pour cette raison.
Mes vidéos de vols sur Vimeo
Ma carte de voyage sur Openflights
Oui peut-être, j'en sais rien. Mais en tout cas ça ne grogne pas qu'en France 😛
Oui, mais ce que je démontre plus haut, c'est que pour une même réforme ça grogne en France mais pas dans les autres pays c'est bien la preuve qu'en France on aime bien manifester, en tout cas plus que nos collegues européens et ce n'est pas pour rien si depuis l'étranger on est souvent perçu comme le pays des grèves.
Oui, mais ce que je démontre plus haut, c'est que pour une même réforme ça grogne en France mais pas dans les autres pays c'est bien la preuve qu'en France on aime bien manifester, en tout cas plus que nos collegues européens et ce n'est pas pour rien si depuis l'étranger on est souvent perçu comme le pays des grèves.
Mes vidéos de vols sur Vimeo
Ma carte de voyage sur Openflights
Bonsoir,
Pendant que les contrôleurs aériens font grève et monopolisent les journaux, les professeurs tentent de se faire entendre à propos de la réforme et ça ce n'est pas un problème de privilège mais un problème de l'avenir de notre société!
Je veux juste vous citez un exemple, celui d'un professeur de SES après 20 ans dans l'éducation national, BAC+5, elle ne touche que 2300 euros par mois ( pour 15 heures devant une classe + des heures de préparation de cours + de corrections = 35 heures/semaine). En prenant en compte cela, on peut comprendre les personnes qui trouvent que les contrôleurs vont trop loin!
Pendant que les contrôleurs aériens font grève et monopolisent les journaux, les professeurs tentent de se faire entendre à propos de la réforme et ça ce n'est pas un problème de privilège mais un problème de l'avenir de notre société!
Je veux juste vous citez un exemple, celui d'un professeur de SES après 20 ans dans l'éducation national, BAC+5, elle ne touche que 2300 euros par mois ( pour 15 heures devant une classe + des heures de préparation de cours + de corrections = 35 heures/semaine). En prenant en compte cela, on peut comprendre les personnes qui trouvent que les contrôleurs vont trop loin!
Il me semble que la rémunération des professeurs est basée sur la catégorie B, ce qui correspond au recrutement minimum lorsque le BAC+3 n'était pas exigé (aujourd'hui il faut BAC+5), et qu'on a enlevé aux salaires de la catégorie B, la durée des vacances scolaires, avant de mensualiser (les professeurs ne sont donc pas payés pendant les vacances scolaires, leur salaire est juste lissé pour avoir à peu près la même chose chaque mois).
Du coup, ils sont devenus défavorisés par rapport au reste de la fonction publique, alors que leurs conditions de travail se sont dégradées (à qui la faute?) et ce n'est pas près de s'arrêter (les dernières réformes semblent enfoncer l'enseignement dans de nouvelles erreurs guère plus enthousiasmantes que les conséquences du plan Langevin-Vallon).
Néanmoins, je tiens à souligner que par rapport au privé cette fois, leurs salaires font des envieux...😕
Bonjour, au moment où nous nous rendons compte que les langues étrangères ne sont pas maitrisées par les élèves en fin de terminale, on veut supprimer des classes et faire passer l'un des meilleurs lycées français de 32/33 élèves par classes en 2nde à environ 40 !!! Comment voulez-vous apprendre l'anglais à 40 par classe??? C'est impossible. Surtout quand un lycée reçoit un allemand, qui vient travailler en France pendant 5 mois, qui lui maitrese parfaitement l'anglais, notre français et apprend le russe😐.
Breff... et ces professeurs aujoud'hui ne comprennent pas cette grève des contrôleurs qui fait de l'ombre à un grand problème. Mais bon la réforme est passé, je peux déjà vous dire quelle ne sera pas appliqué partout. En effet chaque lycée est specifique et on ne peut pas tout faire.
leurs conditions de travail se sont dégradées
Ce qui fait le plus mal au coeur c'est de lire sur ce forum un lycéen dire que ses professeurs sont des " cons"😕, même si on n'est pas d'accord avec ces professeurs le minimum c'est quand même de les respecter.
leurs conditions de travail se sont dégradées
Ce qui fait le plus mal au coeur c'est de lire sur ce forum un lycéen dire que ses professeurs sont des " cons"😕, même si on n'est pas d'accord avec ces professeurs le minimum c'est quand même de les respecter.
Hello
Suite du feuilleton.😏
Il rate finalement son vol, comme prévu...
Il prend le vol du lendemain AA avec escale à NY.
Il arrive donc le jeudi à San juan (Puerto Rico), au lieu du mercredi.
Par contre, les bagages ne suivent pas et il les récupèrent que le dimanche soit 4 jours après.
Que peut il prétendre comme indemnité/remboursement ... ?
Merci.
Arrivé à Madrid à 13h39, en même temps que le vol pour San Juan de Puerto Rico quittait sa porte d'embarquement, donc il est probablement actuellement à Madrid, et ce jusqu'à demain.
Que peut il prétendre comme indemnité/remboursement ... ?
Merci.
Arrivé à Madrid à 13h39, en même temps que le vol pour San Juan de Puerto Rico quittait sa porte d'embarquement, donc il est probablement actuellement à Madrid, et ce jusqu'à demain.
Le remboursement des vêtements et autres affaires qu'il a dû acheter en attendant l'arrivée de la valise.
Contributions CC BY-SA
Log in first, then come back to this page.
You might also like
More discussions
Hi there,
I’m planning a winter trip across India. Departing in early December and returning to France in mid-April.
My main concern is finding an airline that offers this round-trip with the fewest hassles regarding cancellations or flight schedule changes. The unstable geopolitical situation in the Middle East isn’t making this search any easier—recent reviews online about airlines from Gulf states describe quite a few struggles over the past few months.
The direct Paris-Delhi round-trip flights offered by Air France or Air India are probably the safest options, but not the cheapest!
Given this uncertainty, I’m still holding off on finalizing my ticket purchase... Maybe some of you India lovers on VoyageForum have tips or experiences to share?
Thanks, and happy travels to all.
Hi everyone,
I’m heading to Madagascar in early October to cycle from Tana to Diego along the east coast.
I really want to visit the Masoala Peninsula and its primary forest. If anyone’s interested, I’m open to company.
Maybe see you soon!
Hi,
I’m thinking of heading to Malaysia soon.
I’ve seen some great prices and direct flights from Paris with Malaysia Airlines.
Is it a reliable airline?
Thanks for your feedback!
Hello,
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August. My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August. My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Hi there,
We had planned a trip to Sicily in August, and due to the volcanic eruption of Mount Etna, my flight was canceled. The airline is refunding the outbound flight, but none of the non-refundable expenses: accommodation booked through Booking, rental car, and the return flight aren’t covered. My SUPER Gold card doesn’t work in this specific case! :( If anyone has been in this situation, could you let me know if you were able to get any recourse and, if so, how?
Thanks in advance
I’ve been traveling regularly for over twenty years,
but this is the first time an airline has treated me as poorly as Air France.
Two trips, two problems. The latest:
Trip from Seoul to Rennes. Last leg from Paris CDG to Rennes with Air France.
I arrive in Paris and go straight to Air France to get my boarding pass to Rennes. They assure me my baggage is continuing to Rennes.
Arriving in Rennes, no baggage—same as five other people.
The Air France office is closed, and the airport staff tell me there’s rarely anyone there.
With the help of the airport staff, I file a claim online, and my baggage is almost immediately located. As a result, I’m told I’ll have it the next day.
Four days later, the baggage is still in the same place at CDG—nothing’s moving.
The problem is Air France has no customer service. What they call customer service is a department that takes an hour to answer and just repeats what’s on the online form. No coordination, no way to get things moving. I guess Air France would rather pay the compensation after 21 days than actually do something.
I’ve had lost baggage on other trips, but this is the first time I’ve seen such indifference and lack of professionalism.
but this is the first time an airline has treated me as poorly as Air France.
Two trips, two problems. The latest:
Trip from Seoul to Rennes. Last leg from Paris CDG to Rennes with Air France.
I arrive in Paris and go straight to Air France to get my boarding pass to Rennes. They assure me my baggage is continuing to Rennes.
Arriving in Rennes, no baggage—same as five other people.
The Air France office is closed, and the airport staff tell me there’s rarely anyone there.
With the help of the airport staff, I file a claim online, and my baggage is almost immediately located. As a result, I’m told I’ll have it the next day.
Four days later, the baggage is still in the same place at CDG—nothing’s moving.
The problem is Air France has no customer service. What they call customer service is a department that takes an hour to answer and just repeats what’s on the online form. No coordination, no way to get things moving. I guess Air France would rather pay the compensation after 21 days than actually do something.
I’ve had lost baggage on other trips, but this is the first time I’ve seen such indifference and lack of professionalism.
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi,
I booked an Etihad ticket on their website for Dusseldorf-Abu Dhabi. In the first name field, I entered all my first names (something I never do and I regret it, but the site was confusing). Everything is spelled correctly, but the problem is that I just received my new passport and only my first two first names and the first letter of the third appear—there’s no trace of the last one.
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in. Thanks for your feedback!
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in. Thanks for your feedback!
Hi everyone,
Next January, I’m heading to India.
My outbound flight is with Emirates from Paris to Dubai, then another Emirates flight from Dubai to Calcutta.
Could anyone tell me how the connection works? I’ve heard there’s a dedicated Emirates zone, but how does it actually work in practice—I’ve got a 2-hour layover.
Thanks so much!
Take care.
Hi there,
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon. I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport. Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…). AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly. On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double! In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others? Given the price difference, I’m hesitant… Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go? Thanks, HERVE
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon. I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport. Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…). AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly. On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double! In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others? Given the price difference, I’m hesitant… Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go? Thanks, HERVE
Hi everyone, I’ve unfortunately only just noticed that I booked two flight tickets, but I made a mistake on the second first name. Basically, my computer auto-filled and typed my first name twice, so both tickets are in my first name. Only the last names—mine and my friend’s—are correct.
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common). I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common). I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
Hello,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows: - Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes; - A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late; - Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens); - Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight; - If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation; - The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason; - In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/ Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed. - Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps. - Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation. - If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/ - If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed. - The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt. - Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont. - Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
Best regards,
Hi there,
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia. Sincerely, Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding. Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage... Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
Hi,
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies. Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
Hi there,
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket. On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer. Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine. I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket? (It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Thanks for your feedback.
Hi,
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
A pretty serious issue has come up in the past few weeks for traveling to Tanzania.
What’s the deal with airlines in Tanzania? https://www.capital.fr/economie-politique/ce-pays-est-tres-touristique-mais-ses-compagnies-aeriennes-sont-placees-sur-liste-noire-par-l-europe-1515325 https://www.charentelibre.fr/tourisme/la-tanzanie-sur-liste-noire-de-l-europe-des-vols-interieurs-a-haut-risque-pour-100-000-touristes-francais-25002566.php
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania. The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines. So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers. Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this. Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops. Do any of you have updates? Thanks!
Loïc
Hi,
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
...
Doha Airport on October 21, 2025:

...
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
Hello,
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
Hello,
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG. Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover? We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker). We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA. For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai. Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)? We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Bluff or not? Stay tuned....
Hi everyone,
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
Hi there!
Has anyone taken the direct flight from CDG to Las Vegas with Air France?
Looking forward to your feedback!
Hey everyone,
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one). The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much! I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
Hi there,
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul? I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric






