Suite à un retard, Ryanair a logé ses passagers pendant une nuit, non pas à l'hôtel, mais dans un centre de demandeurs d'asile.
Une nuit en dortoire, sans aucune intimité et absence totale de sanitaires pour les femmes.
Aucun repas ni restauration fournie par la compagnie, contrairement aux obligations legales, seules des caisses d'eau ont été déposées.
La compagnie a prétextée les hôtels complets dans les environs, ce qui a été formellement contesté par les hôteliers de la région qui avaient les capacités nécessaires pour accueillir tout le monde.
Quand on choisi un vol low-cost, on ne se plaint pas d'avoir des services low-cost. Comme vous le dit l'Evil Pajero, vous avez la possibilité d'un recours légal, cela devrait vous suffire amplement.
Pour le reste, encore une fois, vous avez ce que vous payer pour.
Transmettez aux journaux que j'ai cité et dont j'ai repris le titre.
Je n'ai pas écrit que les personnes étaient logées au milieu des demandeurs d'asile, mais c'est un lieu dont la vocation est destinée à cette population.
Transmettez aux journaux que j'ai cité et dont j'ai repris le titre.
Je n'ai pas écrit que les personnes étaient logées au milieu des demandeurs d'asile, mais c'est un lieu dont la vocation est destinée à cette population.
Était. Et quand on cite un article, on le lis, et non pas seulement le titre.
A la base, la Suissesse était censée embarquer à bord d'un vol Ryanair pour Porto (Portugal), fin juillet à l'Allgäu Airport de Memmingen, en Bavière (All).
Quand on est Suisse, on ne s'abaisse pas à prendre un vol low-cost - tout au plus un easyJet (Switserland). On a les moyens (il en faut) de prendre un vol de Swiss.
Cette Suissesse a voulu prendre un vol Ryanair en catimini, en allant le chercher en Allemagne : bien fait pour sa pomme !
Suisse ou Guatémaltèque, cela ne change rien au débat. La vraie question, c'est pourquoi a-t-on logé ces personnes dans ce bâtiment (autrefois centre pour réfugiés) plutôt que dans les hôtels de la région ? Certainement pour faire des économies, que cela vous plaise ou non... 😉
Suisse ou Guatémaltèque, cela ne change rien au débat. La vraie question, c'est pourquoi a-t-on logé ces personnes dans ce bâtiment (autrefois centre pour réfugiés) plutôt que dans les hôtels de la région ? Certainement pour faire des économies, que cela vous plaise ou non... 😉
Bien sûr, que c'est pour faire des économies ! Il n'y a rien de honteux à cela. Grâce à ces économies, Ryanair peut proposer des billets à des prix beaucoup plus bas que les autres compagnies.
Les 180 passagers de ce vol ont été logés dans ce dortoir (qui, sur la photo, paraît tout à fait propre et convenable), et cette façon de faire permet à des millions de clients (dont ces 180-là) de se payer des vols entre trois et dix fois moins chers que chez les concurrents.
Mais si vous n'aimez pas cela, rien ne vous oblige à prendre Ryanair.
Aucun risque que je prenne Ryanair ou Easyjet, néanmoins, il apparaît qu'à part le logement spartiate, ils n'aient pas non plus reçu un repas même sommaire... 😉
C'est vous qui y perdez !
Je prends en moyenne une demi-douzaine de vols Ryanair par mois, et cela fait des mois que je n'ai pas vu un vol rempli à moins de 90% : bien souvent ils sont pleins (189 pax). Ce qui prouve que beaucoup de voyageurs ne pensent pas comme vous.
Mais il faut de tout pour faire un monde, comme on dit ! 😉
Ne perdez pas votre temps avec B777, il s'agit d'un troll bien connu sur le forum, qui vendrait père et mère s'il le pouvait pour se payer un billet d'avion.
Ne perdez pas votre temps avec B777, il s'agit d'un troll bien connu sur le forum, qui vendrait père et mère s'il le pouvait pour se payer un billet d'avion.
D'abord, c'est 737 et pas 777, vos connaissances en aviation sont approximatives.
Ensuite, je n'ai nul besoin de vendre père et mère pour me payer un billet d'avion, puisque je voyage sur Ryanair.
🙂
Toutes mes excuses pour le mauvais lien et merci d'avoir rectifié celui-ci, petit soucis de copier-coller.
Pas grave.
Ceci dit, tôt le matin chez moi, votre lien ne s'ouvrait même pas du tout... Un correctif du journal "Le Temps" après coup peut-être ? On ne saura jamais...
Bien sûr, que c'est pour faire des économies ! Il n'y a rien de honteux à cela
Ben si, et cela va à l'encontre de l'article 9-1-b) du règlement 261/04 de l'UE (règlement qui oblige Ryanair dans la mesure où son vol partait d'Allemagne) :
"Les passagers se voient offrir gratuitement: un hébergement à l'hôtel aux cas où un séjour d'attente d'une ou plusieurs nuits est nécessaire"
Cette Suissesse a voulu prendre un vol Ryanair en catimini, en allant le chercher en Allemagne : bien fait pour sa pomme !
Vous avez beau vous défendre de bosser pour Ryanair, vous en êtes le pire Community Manager Officieux.
Halte à la désinformation.
Les conseilleurs ne sont pas les payeurs.
Vous avez beau vous défendre de bosser pour Ryanair, vous en êtes le pire Community Manager Officieux.
Come je l'ai déjà souvent répété, je ne travaille pas et n'ai jamais travaillé pour aucune compagnie touchant de près ou de loin à l'aviation.
Par contre, vous, vous vous décrivez comme "responsable clientèle pour une compagnie aérienne française à CDG" - ce qui explique bien votre animosité à l'encontre de Ryanair.
Ce qui me choque, ce n'est pas forcément que le lieu soit un centre de demandeurs d'asile, non utilisé actuellement par cette population.
En France les demandeurs d'asile sont hébergés dans des hôtels, en particulier ceux d'une chaîne économique rachetés à un grand groupe hôtelier.
Ce qui est choquant c'est de loger les passagers dans des dortoirs, sans aucune intimité, avec une hygiène limite, sans facilités pour les femmes et une absence de restauration.
Ce n'etait pas une situation d'urgence ni de catastrophe naturelle ou autre nécessitant des mesures adéquates.
Alors oui, j'ai trouvé utile d'informer les voyageurs de ce forum, non pas de l'irregularité qui est banale, mais de sa gestion et de la manière dont la compagnie prend en charge ses passagers.
Sans parler que l'indemnisation européenne ne semble pas être facile à obtenir de la part de la compagnie, contrairement à certaines compagnies traditionnelles qui semblent l'accorder assez facilement (selon des temoignages lu ici).
Après que Madame résidente Suisse, avec son niveau de vie très conséquent, aurait eu meilleur temps de voyager une compagnie de meilleure qualité dont elle avait probablement les moyens, c'est un avis personnel que je partage mais qui n'excuse pas les faits cités.
Par contre, vous, vous vous décrivez comme "responsable clientèle pour une compagnie aérienne française à CDG"
Je ne cache pas mon statut et me suis présenté comme tel dès mon deuxième message sur VF, en javier 2006.
Et reprenez mon historique, rien de spécial à l'égard de Ryanair. Seulement là, la position de RYR est indéfendable, quand bien même vos œillères puissent être frappées d'une lyre dorée.
Bonne journée.
Halte à la désinformation.
Les conseilleurs ne sont pas les payeurs.
Ryanair n'est pas la pire compagnie dans le respect des droits à indemnisation forfaitaire des passagers ! Bien au contraire ! On peut même lui décerner la palme d'or !
Vous savez comme moi qu'une hirondelle ne fait pas le printemps...
Maintenant, un "détail" me chagrine dans l'histoire de cet internaute indemnisé par Ryanair :
Comment se fait-il, pour une compagnie connue pour ses méthodes marketing/commerciales agressives, qu'elle indemnise notre internaute à hauteur de 750EUR ???? Ce montant ne correspond à aucune indemnisation réglementaire et est bien au dessus du montant prévu pour un vol international extra-européen (600EUR si le retard est supérieur à 4h, sinon c'est 300EUR).
pour un vol d'une distance inférieure à 1500kms, l'indemnisation est de 250EUR, moitié moins si le retard est inférieur à 2h...)
Que nous vaut la générosité de Ryanair ? Ce dossier concernait-il 3 personnes ?
Halte à la désinformation.
Les conseilleurs ne sont pas les payeurs.
Quand on choisi un vol low-cost, on ne se plaint pas d'avoir des services low-cost. Comme vous le dit l'Evil Pajero, vous avez la possibilité d'un recours légal, cela devrait vous suffire amplement.
Pour le reste, encore une fois, vous avez ce que vous payer pour.
On vol bien mieux dans certaines compagnies dites low-cost que traditionnelle ....
Je viens de faire une simulation sur le site de ryanair pour un aller retour a edimbourg pour le mois de juin et au total le voyage coute pour 2 personnes 281…
Je n'ai jamais pris de vol low cost et je désire savoir comment se déroule sur Ryanair un vol d'une durée minimum de 2 h. Pourriez-vous me dire comment est le…
Je viens de réserver mon 3ème et peut-être dernier billet sur Ryanair. En effet j'essaye de partir de Paris Beauvais pour Gerone en Espagne et cela fait 2 fois…
Hi there,
We had planned a trip to Sicily in August, and due to the volcanic eruption of Mount Etna, my flight was canceled. The airline is refunding the outbound flight, but none of the non-refundable expenses: accommodation booked through Booking, rental car, and the return flight aren’t covered. My SUPER Gold card doesn’t work in this specific case! :( If anyone has been in this situation, could you let me know if you were able to get any recourse and, if so, how?
Thanks in advance
Back in February, I booked a flight with Air France-KLM from Lyon to San Diego with a layover in Amsterdam (flights operated by KLM). The flight is scheduled for late August.
My Lyon→Amsterdam flight was canceled by KLM in June, and a replacement flight the evening before was booked for me. So, I’ll end up spending the night at Amsterdam Airport to catch my flight to San Diego the next morning.
Since the cancellation happened more than 14 days before departure, I know I’m not entitled to financial compensation (EU Regulation 261/2004). But am I entitled to reimbursement for a hotel night in Amsterdam?
Hi,
Air Cairo offers good prices on domestic flights and schedules that work for us, but is this airline reliable?
Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Hi,
I booked an Etihad ticket on their website for Dusseldorf-Abu Dhabi. In the first name field, I entered all my first names (something I never do and I regret it, but the site was confusing). Everything is spelled correctly, but the problem is that I just received my new passport and only my first two first names and the first letter of the third appear—there’s no trace of the last one.
I called Etihad, and of course, they tried to charge me $100 USD to remove that last first name. But I’m hesitant because usually, I only put my first first name and not the others, and I’ve never had an issue... So I’m wondering if having that extra first name, which isn’t on my passport, could get me denied at check-in.
Thanks for your feedback!
Hi everyone,
Next January, I’m heading to India.
My outbound flight is with Emirates from Paris to Dubai, then another Emirates flight from Dubai to Calcutta.
Could anyone tell me how the connection works? I’ve heard there’s a dedicated Emirates zone, but how does it actually work in practice—I’ve got a 2-hour layover.
Thanks so much!
Take care.
I’d like to fly to Malta from Lyon.
I’ve read a lot of negative reviews about KM MALTA, especially regarding baggage fees at the airport.
Of course, I don’t want to book through third parties (like SkyScanner, Opodo…).
AIR FRANCE offers tickets to MALTA in partnership, if I understood correctly.
On AIR FRANCE, the tickets include everything (checked baggage, cabin bag, small personal item, seat), whereas with KM MALTA, everything is extra and the final price is almost double!
In this case, is AIR FRANCE considered the same as sites like Opodo or others?
Given the price difference, I’m hesitant…
Have any of you booked with AIR FRANCE for this destination? How did it go?
Thanks,
HERVE
Hi everyone, I’ve unfortunately only just noticed that I booked two flight tickets, but I made a mistake on the second first name. Basically, my computer auto-filled and typed my first name twice, so both tickets are in my first name. Only the last names—mine and my friend’s—are correct.
TAP Portugal refuses to make the change because they consider it a change of passenger, even though it’s clearly a typo (plus, my last name isn’t common).
I’m leaving in 5 days, and buying a new ticket would cost 3 times the original price. Has anyone been in this situation before? I’d like to try negotiating at the airport, but it’s a gamble… Thanks in advance for any advice!
Since it came into force, Regulation 261/2004 of the European Parliament and Council, which defines air passenger rights, has faced fierce resistance from airlines, backed by IATA (the association representing almost all passenger airlines).
Beyond the airlines' often abusive—and even frequently bad-faith—resistance to passenger rights, IATA has been lobbying EU institutions for years, with the Council paying close attention for a long time.
As a result, the Council and the Commission have been proposing revisions to Regulation 261/2004 for years that are particularly unfavorable to passengers. The latest attempt nearly eliminated the right to compensation for delays of 3 hours or more upon arrival at the final destination.
However, since this is a regulation of both the European Parliament AND the Council, the two bodies had to agree.
But the European Parliament has always stood firm, consistently responding that passenger rights must be preserved.
After 11 years of struggle, it seems likely that we’re finally nearing the end of the match between the European Commission, the Council (the 27 heads of state or government), and the European Parliament.
Indeed, the Commission and the European Parliament have agreed on a text that will be debated again on Monday, July 6, 2026, with a vote scheduled for July 7, 2026. It’s very likely that this text, which would come into force in a year, will be adopted.
The main changes would be as follows:
- Families with children will no longer be forced to pay to sit together on planes;
- A flight will be considered canceled (not just delayed) if it departs more than one hour late;
- Right to compensation for arrival at the final destination if the delay exceeds 3 hours (no longer "3 hours OR more"). The arrival time will be when the plane, having reached its parking spot, engages its parking brakes (no longer when the aircraft door opens);
- Airlines can no longer refuse boarding or charge extra on the return flight for a passenger who didn’t take the outbound flight;
- If a flight is canceled, the airline must, at the same time as informing passengers of the event, offer the choice between a refund and re-routing, and inform them of their rights to assistance and, if applicable, compensation;
- The airline must, without undue delay, inform passengers of the reason;
- In the case of a connecting flight, if the connection is missed and the delay at the final destination entitles the passenger to compensation, the responsible airline will be liable. This is very different from the current situation, where, under the KLM ruling, any airline operating a segment of the flight is liable for compensation. This promises more disputes that the Court of Justice of the European Union will have to resolve if two separate airlines operating segments of a connecting flight are both responsible for the delay. See this case for an example: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2026/04/18/swiss-international-air-lines-la-mauvaise-foi/
Moreover, this case demonstrates in advance another potential dispute: It could be argued that it wasn’t a missed connection since the flight was canceled before the first leg even departed.
- Within 96 hours of a flight that could entitle passengers to compensation, the airline must contact them to inform them of their rights and explain the next steps.
- Passengers must claim their right to compensation within 9 months. This is very different from the current situation, as Regulation 261/2004 sets no time limit. Currently, national law applies—in France, the limit is 5 years. The airline must respond within 30 days. If the airline refuses compensation on the grounds of "extraordinary circumstances," it must specify which type of case it refers to from the list in the annex of the new regulation. If the case isn’t on the list, the airline must explain what the event was, why it qualifies as extraordinary circumstances with "clear, substantial, and concise" explanations, and why it’s directly linked to the reason given. It must also declare what "reasonable measures" were taken to mitigate the issue. This is, of course, a huge change in the regulation, with the clear goal of preventing airlines from declaring just anything as "extraordinary circumstances" to avoid compensation.
- If, within 3 hours of a last-minute canceled or delayed flight, the airline hasn’t offered re-routing under comparable transport conditions and as soon as possible—whether on one of its own flights or another airline’s—the passenger will have the right to arrange their own re-routing and demand a refund for the new ticket, up to 400% of the original ticket price. This is a significant improvement that would have likely prevented the case described here: https://retardimportantavion.wordpress.com/2024/01/12/reacheminement-catastrophique-droit-indemnisation-meme-circonstances-extraordinaires-2/
- If a flight is canceled due to "extraordinary circumstances," the airline will only be required to offer up to 3 nights in a hotel. This is a major change, as there’s currently no limit. Expect disputes if the extraordinary circumstances end while the passenger hasn’t been re-routed.
- The price of a flight, as first displayed, must obligatorily include a cabin bag. This doesn’t prevent the airline from offering a price reduction if the passenger waives the cabin bag. This will put an end to abnormal practices, such as (just one example) Condor charging extra for a cabin bag on long-haul flights like Frankfurt (Germany)–Puerto Plata (Dominican Republic)–Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)–Frankfurt.
- Free correction of a passenger’s name if requested 48 hours before departure. Note: This can’t be used to replace one passenger with another—just to correct a typo, e.g., Dupont instead of Dpont.
- Airlines’ websites and apps must include information on how to file a claim.
It’s clear that, despite a few details, these changes are very positive for upholding passenger rights. It remains to be seen whether this text will be definitively adopted on July 7, 2026, as is very likely, and, more importantly, whether IATA will encourage airlines to loyally respect these new rules or persist in their old habits.
I’m planning a trip to Georgia this summer and I’ve been comparing some airlines. I’m not particularly set on flying with Pegasus (though it’s convenient with direct flights from Lyon to Tbilisi), but right off the bat, Pegasus states this:
As of January 1, 2026, all foreign nationals traveling to Georgia for tourism purposes will be required to present valid travel health insurance. Guests who fail to provide the relevant health insurance will not be accepted on our flights to Georgia.
Sincerely,
Pegasus Airlines
In other words, if you don’t show proof of travel health insurance, you’ll be denied boarding.
Personally, my credit card insurance has always been enough for me, and I’d rather not take out extra coverage...
Have any of you run into this issue before? If not, what do you think? Why is Pegasus asking for this proof? Other airlines don’t mention it at all.
I bought my flight ticket with my first (usual) first name, which appears first on my passport. However, I have two first names on my passport, and of course, it’s mentioned in the machine-readable zone at the bottom.
I booked with Turkish Airlines (through an online agency) for a trip to South Korea.
I wanted to know if it would be a problem that I only used my first first name on the ticket, while my passport has two. I had requested through the agency to add the second first name, but the airline refused because it doesn’t meet their general conditions. (They must have seen that the last name and first name were the same, and only the second first name was added.)
So, my ticket has my last name and first first name correctly spelled, and when I check in online, I’ll enter the passport details correctly.
I’ll have a layover in Istanbul on the flight.
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Have a great day.
Hi there,
I traveled in June 2025 with Nouvelair Destinations to Hammamet.
I had one checked bag and one carry-on sized 40x24x30, which I usually take on low-cost flights, and I didn’t have any issues. But I just read on a website that Nouvel Air only accepts carry-ons of 40x20x15. I’m flying back to Djerba in June—what do you think? Especially since that size is impossible to find??????? Thanks
Hi, it's my first time taking a plane and I chose EasyJet for a Geneva -> Barcelona flight.
I booked my ticket.
I received my booking reference by email, but I don’t see the actual ticket (barcode or QR code?).
Then I checked in to get the boarding pass with the flight details, QR code, etc. But does this boarding pass act as the ticket?
Because I’ve seen several times online that the flight ticket and the boarding pass aren’t the same thing.
We're leaving for Albania on June 18th. When I validated the flight tickets with Wizz Air on Booking, I only put my son's first name but forgot to include his other three first names on the ticket.
On the passport: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAMES: toto titi tutu tata
On the flight ticket: SURNAME: Dupont, FIRST NAME: toto
I can't seem to reach anyone at Wizz Air to get an answer.
Booking and Wizz Air's chat say I need to modify it, but ChatGPT says it should be fine.
I wanted to know if he can fly like this or if I need to change his ticket?
(It costs 140 €, I know I shouldn't have made a mistake🙁)
Basically, all airlines have been blacklisted because they don’t meet European safety standards. They’re banned from flying in Europe but continue operating in Tanzania.
The main issue is that travel agencies’ civil liability no longer applies to blacklisted airlines.
So we can’t allow clients to fly with these carriers.
Of course, there’s huge pressure from European agencies, which are forced to disrupt their plans or even cancel trips because of this.
Personally, I’ve got a trip planned for February 2026 to the southern parks in Tanzania, so I’ll be keeping an eye on how this develops.
Do any of you have updates?
Thanks!
Right now, with the war raging in Iran and affecting all the neighboring countries of the Persian Gulf, many airports are completely closed to all traffic.
Several airlines like Qatar Airways, Emirates, and others have almost completely halted their operations.
Whether in the Middle East or Africa, many travelers are stranded—maybe for a long time... A heartfelt thought for them and the struggles this will cause.
Four months ago, I was in Kenya with a flight booked through Qatar Airways... I can’t even imagine how I’d react if I were stuck there now. ??
Wishing all these travelers courage, patience, and success in making it back home.
Hello, some (potentially) good news for Brazil lovers—GOL airline is launching a route to Europe from Rio, starting in September for Lisbon, then Paris at a later date that hasn’t been announced yet.
They’ll be using their new A330-900 neo.
No prices have been announced so far, but hopefully we’ll find direct flights from GIG at a more interesting fare than AF or Latam…
I’m really surprised because in TUI’s new tour packages, the airlines they’re using are of low quality. Before, they used to prioritize major airlines, but now it’s small airlines from small countries—companies with terrible ratings and borderline safety concerns. I even just noticed this note for a Tanzania trip: "We inform you that the domestic flight segment in Tanzania included in your trip is operated by an airline listed on the European Union’s list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union. This ban only applies to European Union airspace, meaning this airline is not permitted to take off, land, or fly over European airspace. However, this airline is authorized to operate in Tanzania."
This means they’re using airlines on the blacklist!! It’s pretty worrying for safety. What do you all think?
We’re planning a cruise to the UAE/QATAR/OMAN starting from DUBAI, with flights departing from Paris CDG.
Which airlines would you recommend for round-trip flights, with or without a layover?
We need assistance for check-in and boarding/disembarking (my husband is a mobility-impaired traveler who uses a cane and/or a walker).
We’ve done a cruise return from Dubai to Paris CDG before in 2016, with a layover in Istanbul, but we booked the transfer and return flight with COSTA.
For our current plan, it would be with Celestyal, which doesn’t offer round-trip flights from Paris to Dubai.
Should we book very far in advance, or is a few months before departure enough (4/6 months)?
We’re thinking of arriving the day before the ship departs, so we’d need to stay overnight in Dubai—either on the way there or for the return flight, depending on the flight schedules. Could you recommend a hotel not too far from the airport, and how to get to the port from the airport?
Thanks so much for your advice. Have a great Sunday! Mum49
Hi,
It's all in the title—this means nothing's getting through, so no more oil.
In Europe, kerosene reserves are still good, but by the end of April, flights will have to be reduced.
European airports fear running out of kerosene if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t reopened within three weeks
I’m reaching out to ask for your help with a bit of a problem:
I booked a flight to Berlin from Orly for April 15th—it’s coming up fast. But I just made an annoying discovery: my passport expired two weeks ago.
From what I understand, in principle, I can still travel within the Schengen Zone with an expired passport as long as it’s been less than five years. However, EasyJet’s website explicitly requires a valid ID (and just to add to the fun, my national ID card has been expired for a while now).
So, I’d love to know: how strict are EasyJet’s ID checks? Do they enforce validity rules strictly and refuse boarding if the ID isn’t valid? Or is it more of a luck-of-the-draw situation?
Basically, should I just write off this trip now, or should I still try my luck—maybe with a little tearful plea? Has anyone here had a similar experience? I can’t be the only one, right!
I booked a flight with RyanAir for next month, with the priority+ option and two cabin bags. So I can take a 10 kg bag with dimensions 55x40x20 in the cabin (plus another smaller one).
The problem is that the smallest suitcase I have (which is supposed to be designed specifically for cabin size standards, according to the manual) has the following dimensions: 55x37x21, so it's just 1 cm over (wheels included) on one of the measurements.
I wasn’t too worried at first, but I’ve read dozens of stories about people’s misadventures and the hassles they’ve had with RyanAir.
Since I don’t want my suitcase to end up in the hold (that would waste time picking it up when I’m already arriving late and need to get to the city center), nor do I want to pay an extra fee (apparently 50 €) for the outbound and return flights for just 1 centimeter—especially since I paid for the "priority+" option and I’m not exactly rolling in money—I’d love some advice.
Have any of you been in the same situation? I’ve read that with this airline, they check bags in templates (testing them in different positions) and are completely uncompromising. I tried contacting customer service, who, as luck would have it, "don’t handle this kind of request," and a rep I spoke to wasn’t much help.
I know it’s a low-cost airline, and I don’t expect luxury or even kindness, but come on—just 1 cm on a short flight with the + option... I’m a bit overwhelmed by everything I’ve read...
Just to clarify, since I’m going for 8 days, I can’t just take one bag for my stuff. I’ve done that for shorter trips before, and it was a hassle—I even had to buy an extra bag for the return trip... Luckily, the inspector was nice about it!
Thanks so much!
I’m a newbie when it comes to air travel :) Hope I posted this in the right section!
When I run searches on Skyscanner, I see that only Lufthansa has flights to Seoul with just one stop. Air France doesn’t show up, even though I thought the French airline served Seoul?
I can’t even log into the Air France website—it keeps glitching.
Hi there,
I’d like to return to Uzbekistan next April for 10 days with my husband to visit our son who lives there. We went last July and I bought the flight tickets (direct flight from Paris on Uzbekistan Airways) about 2 months in advance at very reasonable prices. I’ve been checking for late April for a few weeks now, and the tickets are much more expensive and keep rising. I can’t figure out if the prices are going up because it’s still a bit too early to buy and they’ll likely drop if the planes aren’t full, or if it’s because the period is actually in high demand. For reference, last year I bought my son’s ticket on May 30th for a departure on June 3rd—just 3 days later—at a very low price that didn’t budge at all.
Just in case, does anyone know the pricing trends for this airline and can advise me? Should I wait or not?
Thanks, and feel free to ask if you need any tips about the country!
My wife bought a flight ticket (Lucky Air) under her Thai maiden name and was issued a Chinese visa on her new Thai passport but with her French married name (due to administrative requirements). She was denied boarding by the airline in Bangkok for the flight to Kunming—resulting in the loss of our round-trip flight tickets, including mine since we were traveling together—despite presenting both passports at the airline counter at the same time.
Hi there.
I’m planning a trip to Chile, and the fares from the Colombian airline Avianca are really appealing.
Way cheaper than Air France, for example.
That said, the reviews I’ve seen online aren’t great.
What do you think of this airline?
Have any of you taken long-haul flights with Avianca?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Eric
This might be a silly question, but I’m traveling to Japan from CDG and returning via Osaka with EVA Air, and I have a pretty bulky aluminum knee brace.
It’s this model:
https://enovis-medtech.eu/fr_FR/OA-FullForce-74358.html
Has anyone had any experience with airport security checks or flying with one of these?
I can't seem to find flights between the Cape Verde islands on the airline's website. No matter the date or route, I always get the same response: "no flights on this date."
See the photo.
Would anyone have an explanation? Surely not all flights are fully booked in July?
Hi there,
I have a question...
Has anyone managed to get a refund from Oman Air?
After a delayed flight, we missed our connecting flight to get home!!
At midnight, the flight attendant booked us on a flight to Nice via Munich, even though we were in Munich and wanted to get back to Nice... Too tired from the trip, we didn’t notice the mistake!!
The next day, of course, the booking wasn’t valid!!
We had to pay again for the flight back to Nice...
I’m really struggling!! I think they’re giving me the runaround!!
I’ve sent several emails, tried Messenger and WhatsApp, but the only responses I get are: "We need to investigate!! We’ll get back to you in 15 days!!"
It’s been over a month!!
I just sent a registered letter (LRAR) to their office at Paris Charles de Gaulle, which is still open!!
Hi!
Sri Lanka has announced it could run out of fuel in the coming weeks if the Strait of Hormuz remains blocked. The government has implemented a mandatory four-day workweek to save oil, and there are long lines at gas stations due to fears of an early shortage.
In Vietnam, the government has warned all airlines that flights will need to be reduced due to a lack of kerosene. The country imports two-thirds of its jet fuel from China and Thailand, but both countries have now banned exports out of fear of domestic shortages.
The state is asking airlines to plan ahead and park aircraft to drastically reduce operations, starting with domestic flights and then international ones. International carriers will also need to cut back on their rotations.
This will begin in the coming days. 🙁